Ledo Kaili language

Ledo Kaili
Ledo Kaili
Native to	Indonesia
Region	Sulawesi
Native speakers	350,000 (2000 census)
Language family	Austronesian Malayo-Polynesian Celebic Kaili–Pamona Northern Kaili Ledo Kaili; ; ; ; ; ;
Language codes
ISO 639-3	lew
Glottolog	ledo1238
Glottopedia	Kaili
	This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters. For an introductory guide on IPA symbols, see Help:IPA.

Ledo Kaili is the largest member of the Kaili languages, which are a dialect chain within the Kaili–Pamona language family. These languages are spoken in Central Sulawesi (Indonesia). Kaili with all of its dialects is one of the largest languages in Sulawesi. One third of the population of Sulawesi Tengah province were (1979) native speakers of a Kaili language. The object language of this article is the main dialect Ledo, which is spoken in the Donggala and Sigi districts (Kabupaten) in and around the provincial capital Palu.

Classification

Ledo has Kaili–Pamona morphological and grammatical features, while its lexicon is mainly of Wotu–Wolio origin.^[3]

Phonology

Consonants

			labial	alveolar	palatal	velar	glottal
Nasals			m	n	ɲ	ŋ
Plosives	plain	voiceless	p	t	tʃ	k	ʔ
	plain	voiced	b	d	dʒ	g
	prenasal	voiceless	ᵐp	ⁿt
	prenasal	voiced	ᵐb	ⁿd	ⁿdʒ	ᵑɡ
Fricatives			v	s			h
Vibrants				r
Laterals				l
Semivowels			w		j

Vowels

	front	central	back
close	i		u
mid	ɛ ~ e		o
open		a

Intonation

Kaili has word-level stress on the penultimate syllable, secondary stress alternates from there on.

Phonotactics

Unaffixed words have up to four (in most cases two) syllables with CV structure:

each C = simple C or Nasal + C
each V = simple V from series 1 resp. 2 or V from 1a/b + V from 1.

Writing and orthography

Kaili has a Latin alphabet without ⟨f⟩, ⟨q⟩ and ⟨x⟩ (which only occur in loan words) and without diacritics. The orthography follows the reformed (1975) rules for Indonesian:

/tʃ/ : ⟨c⟩, /dʒ/ : ⟨j⟩, /ɲ/ : ⟨ny⟩, /ŋ/ : ⟨ng⟩, /j/ : ⟨y⟩

/ʔ/ can be written ⟨’⟩ if necessary (e.g. between identical vowels)

In some grammars and papers long vowels are represented by doubling them (e.g. /aː/ : ⟨aa⟩), this seems not to be a standard, however. Kaili did not have a writing system and a written tradition before the introduction of the Latin script.

Morphology

Kaili is a typical Malayo-Polynesian language with a morphology that has isolating as well as a few agglutinative features. There are many affixes for derivation and verbal inflection. Nouns and adjectives do not have any inflection. There is no overt marking (and no category) of gender, number, and case. (Natural) gender and number (plurality) can be expressed by lexical means if necessary, semanto-syntactic roles are indicated by syntax and verbal inflection, but not morphologically on nouns/NPs.

Comparation and gradation of adjectives are partly morphologic, partly lexical. See section 4 for verbal morphology. Some vowels or nasals might undergo or set off (progressive and regressive) morphophonological processes (nasalization, labialization, and palatalization) at morpheme boundaries.

Unaffixed words out of context tend to be neutral with respect to word class and grammatical categories.

Verbal categories

The inflection of Kaili verbs (some authors prefer: predicatives) is dominated by the two categories of mood and voice, which are conjoined by fused affixes. Apart from voice in the stricter sense there are many other valency-related functions, e.g. causative and factitive. Only direct objects and undergoers of passive sentences are marked by cliticized personal markers.

Mood

Esser (1934) described this category as two distinct tenses comparable to nonfuture/future, even though temporal relations are mostly expressed by lexical rather than morphological means. It should therefore rather be regarded as a distinction between realis for (factual) actions in the present or past from irrealis which is used for future actions/events on the one hand and putative, imaginary, fictional (Van Den Berg: “contrafactual”) actions on the other hand.

The allomorphs {na-}~{ne-}~{no-} stand for realis, the allomorphs {ma-}~{me-}~{mo-} for irrealis; the form of the allomorphs is constituting a kind of inflectional classes and is (synchronically at least) not conditioned by phonology. There are few exceptions where a stem can take two or all three of the allomorphs, yielding verbs with different meanings: e.g. kande 'eat'

na-ngande / ma-ngande 'eat' (transitive)

ne-kande / me-kande 'cut or bite into' (intransitive)

no-kande-si / mo-kande-si 'eat up sth. from so.'

Diatheses

Kaili has two different verbal diatheses which can be described either as focus (agent focus vs. object focus) or voice (active vs. passive), the latter being more suitable if one follows Himmelmann’s (2002) definitions of focus and voice.

active realis

Yaku

1SG

na-ngande

REA-eat

loka

banana

riavi.

yesterday

'I ate [the] banana(s) yesterday.'

active irrealis

Ia

3SG

ma-ngande

IRR-eat

loka

banana

haitu.

DEM

'He will/would [probably] eat the banana(s).'

passive realis

Ni-kande=ku

PASS.REA-eat=1SG

loka

banana

riavi.

yesterday

(1d)

'[The] Banana(s) was/were eaten by me yesterday.'

passive irrealis

Ra-kande=na

PASS.IRR-eat=3SG

loka

banana

haitu.

DEM

'[The] Banana[s] will be/may have been eaten by him.'

Other valency-related mechanisms

Valency can be increased or realigned/shifted by transitivizations, factitives or causatives. Here a few of these mechanisms are demonstrated, which might be interesting from a typological perspective.

Transitivization

Intransitive verbs can be transitivized by {po-}, making the S of the intransitive verbs not the A but the O of the transitive verbs (hidden causative):

Mano

chicken

na-tuvu.

REA-live

'[The] chicken live.'

I

PM

Esa

nom-pa-tuvu

REA-TR-live

mano.

chicken

'Esa breeds chicken.'

Causative

If {po-} is added once more, the transitivized verb can be augmented by a causative. Historically, {popo-} is thus bimorphemic; there are, however, verbs that synchronically do not have a form with only one {po-} attached to them.

No-berei-mo

REA-spouse-COMPL

i

PM

Dula.

Dula

'Dula is already married'

I

PN

Dula

no-berei

REA-spouse

nte

with

i

PM

Ani.

Ani

'Dula married {with] Ani.'

Ia

3SG

nom-po-berei

REA-TR-spouse

i

PM

Ani.

Ani

'He married Ani.'

Totua-na

parent-3SG

ni-po-po-berei

PASS.REA-CAUS-TR-spouse

ia.

3SG

'His parents married him off.'

I

PN

Ni

no-tulisi

REA-write

sura.

letter

'Ni writes [a] letter[s].'

Yaku

1SG

nom-popo-tulisi

REA-CAUS-write

i

PN

Ni

sura.

letter

'I have Ni write [a] letter[s].'

I

PN

Ni

ni-popo-tulisi=ku

PASS.REA-CAUS-write=1SG

sura.

letter

'Ni is being caused to write [a] letter[s] by me.'

Sura

letter

ni-popo-tulisi=ku

PASS.REA-write=1SG

i

PN

Ni.

Ni

'This letter I had written by Ni.'

There is another causative construction (EVANS: requestive) using {peki-}/{meki-}/{neki-}, which adds a semantic role (causer), while syntactically reducing valency, since the causee can only be expressed in a PP (and is mostly omitted).

I

PM

Tira

no-dau

REA-sew

baju.

dress

'Tira sews [a] dress[es].'

Yaku

1SG

meki-dau

REQ.IRR-sew

baju.

dress

'I want to have a dress sewn.'

Yaku

1SG

mom-peki-dau

IRR-REQ-sew

baju

dress

nte

with

Tira.

Tira

'I want to have a dress sewn by Tira.'

Ia

3SG

nom-paka-belo

REA-CAUS-well

dua=ra

sickness=3PL

'He cures their disease(s).'

Ira

3PL

nom-peki-paka-belo

REA-REQ-CAUS-well

dua=ra

sickness=3PL

'They asked him to cure their disease(s).'

Syntax

Kaili is a strict head-initial type language. Heads precede dependents in compounds, phrases, and sentences. Basic sentence order is SVO or VOS (that is: VO generally) with NGen, NAdj, NRel, PrepN, NegV, etc. There is no obligatory copula, the use of the facultative copula is marked for emphasis. In passives, the agent pronoun can be cliticized to the verb, the subject of the passive can stand on either side of the verb.

sakaya

boat

N

mbaso

big

Adj

'a/the big boat', also: 'the boat is big'

banua

house

N

geira

3PL

Gen

'their house'

Yaku

1SG

S

noriapu

REA:cook

V

uta.

vegetables

O

'I'm cooking vegetables.'

Kaluku

coconut_tree

N

hai

DEM

Dem

nalanga

REA:be_high

'This coconut tree is tall.'

Tuamaku

father:1SG

S

hau

[REA]go

V

ri

in

Prep

talua.

garden

N

'My father goes into the garden.'

Hau

[REA]go

V

ri

in

Prep

talua

garden

N

tuamaku

father:1SG

S

'My father goes into the garden.'

I

PM

mangge

uncle

S

nangali

buy

V

bengga.

buffalo

O

'(The) uncle buys (water) buffalo.'

Ningali

PASS.REA:buy

V

bengga.

buffalo

S

'Buffalo are sold / for sale.'

Bengga

buffalo

S

ningali

PASS.REA:buy

V

'Buffalo for sale / are sold.'

Tona

human

N

hai

DEM

Dem

ledo

NEG

Neg

nangande

REA:eat

V

kandea.

rice

'This person doesn’t eat rice.'

Langgai

man

N

haitu

DEM

Dem

no-boba

REA-beat

i

PM

Tira.

Tira

'That man beat[s] Tira.'

Yaku

1SG

nang-gita

REA-see

langgai

man

N

no-boba

REA-beat

Rel

i

PM

Tira.

Tira

'I see the man who beat[s] Tira.'

Sample text

"Panguli nu tesa ntotua nggaulu, naria vei saito madika nipokonona mpu noasu. Ane madotamo rarana haumo ia noasu ante tadulakona. Bara santipa sanggani, bara eo-eo. Ane nambela tonji belo norasi, ane nambela tonji daa vai, mau valeana ledo naria nikava." (SARO, p. 39)

Pa-nguli

PASS;NMLZ-say

nu

SRC

tesa

(hi)story

n-totua

SRC-parent

nggaulu,

former_times

na-ria

REA-be

vei

AFF

saito

one

madika

king

ni-pokono=na

PASS.REA-like=3SG

mpu

very

no-asu.

REA-hunt

Ane

When

ma-dota-mo

IRR-will-COMPL

rara-na

heart-POSS.3SG

hau-mo

go-COMPL

ia

3SG

no-asu

REA-hunt

ante

with

tadulako=na.

Leader=POSS;3SG

Bara

sometimes

sa-ntipa

one-week

sa-nggani,

once (one-time)

bara

sometimes

eo~eo.

day~all

Ane

When

nambela

get

tonji

bird

belo

good

norasi,

success/harvest/result

ane

when

nambela

get

tonji

bird

daa

bad

vai,

again

mau

even

valeana

track

ledo

NEG

naria

be

ni-kava.

PASS.REA-find

"According to a story from my parents, there was once a king who really liked to go hunting. Whenever he wanted to [lit.: it was the will of his heart], he went hunting with his leaders – Sometimes once a week, sometimes every day. When he was lucky [lit good bird], he was successful; when he was unlucky [lit. bad bird], not a single track was to be found."

Sociolinguistics

Dialects and numbers of speakers

There are 13 doculects in the Kaili languages' dialect continuum: Rao, Tajio (or Ajio), Kori, Doi, Unde (or Ndepu, Undepu), Ledo (or Palu), Da’a, Inde, Ija, Edo, Ado, Ava, Tara. Not all dialects are mutually intelligible. Generally they share between 60% and 90% of their vocabulary. (Other sources state 7 dialects which are then sharing 80-95%). Most dialect names simply are the negation words of the respective dialects (cf. ledo above).

Ledo is the main variety, having the highest prestige. It is spoken in and around the provincial capital Palu; furthermore, Ledo serves as a lingua franca in broader parts of central Sulawesi and in few scattered places around Tomini Bay.

Speakers (total): 334.000 (1978) / 290.000 (1983) / 228.500 (1996)

Media and culture

National newspapers and broadcasting stations almost exclusively use Indonesian, the national language. Some private local radio stations in Palu have a program in Ledo. Regional publishers incidentally have books in Kaili available, mostly folk tales and traditional style literature but no translations from other languages into Kaili. Local newspapers and non-oral literature are mostly in Ledo, the oral tradition is still strong and common to the generation older than 20. Some modern bands use Kaili for their lyrics. Bands participating in the annual Palu Rock festival are obliged to perform at least one song in Kaili.

Linguistic imbalance

Cities vs. rural areas

In the larger cities, the transmigrasi-policy of Soeharto had its effects, and there are many native speakers of regional languages from outside Sulawesi that have been moved there during the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. Communication with their migrants is almost always in Indonesian. Thus, many bi- or trilingual families came into being since then. In these families, usually Indonesian is the main vehicle of communication. In the more remote parts of the region, Kaili is still the main or only language for the generations born before the 1930s.

Generation gap

Older people (childhood before 1940s) in most cases grew up monolingual in Kaili. Those born and raised after Indonesia gained independence (1945), generally grew up bilingual (Kaili and Indonesian), using Kaili at home and Indonesian at school/work. The youngest generations (language acquisition since the 1970s) mostly had Indonesian as their first language at home as well and learned Kaili – if at all – only sporadically and tend to be semi-speakers or to have only passive knowledge.

Domains

School, work life and contact with authorities requires the use of Indonesian. Pupils use Indonesian among each other's even if all of them know Kaili. In semi-formal and familiar contexts (e.g. grocery shopping, family visits) Kaili is used if all people present know the language.

Prestige

In highly formal traditional contexts, a fair command of Kaili (especially a "good Ledo") is regarded important. Usually good knowledge of Indonesian is considered much more advantageous, since it is more relevant for school and career. Yet, Kaili is still an important cultural asset, but one that is worthless outside the region.

Endangerment

Having a six-figure number of speakers, Kaili does at first glance not appear to be heavily endangered. Yet, the trend of the last 60, especially the last 20 years,^{[as of?]} shows that Kaili will not be able to withstand the pressure of Indonesian in the long run. Kaili itself, on the other hand, has been an important lingua franca in the area for centuries and thus exerted pressure on smaller local idioms itself. Its importance as a lingua franca is diminishing; Indonesian is taking over its place.

Bibliography

ALWI, HASAN et al. (eds.): Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa (Departemen Pendidikian dan Kebudayaan) / Balai Pustaka: 2000.
ESSER, S.J.: Handleiding voor de beoefening der Ledo-taal. Inleiding, Teksten met vertaling en aanteekeningen en woordenlĳst. Bandung: A.C. Nix, 1934. (= Verhandelingen van het Koninklĳk Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen; Deel LXXII; eerste stuk).
EVANS, DONNA: Causation in Kaili. In: STEINHAUER (ed.), p. 173-189.
FRIBERG, BARBARA (ed.): Sulawesi Language Texts. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1990. (= Language Data; Asia-Pacific Series; 15).
HIMMELMANN, NIKOLAUS P. (1996): Person marking and grammatical relations in Sulawesi. In: STEINHAUER (ed.), p. 115-136.
HIMMELMANN, NIKOLAUS P. (2002): Voice in Western Austronesian: An Update. In: WOUK, FAY / ROSS, MALCOLM (eds.): The history and typology of western Austronesian voice systems. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, The Australian National University, 2002. (= Pacific Linguistics; 518). p. 7-15.
HIMMELMANN, NIKOLAUS P. (forthc.): Language endangerment scenarios in northern Central Sulawesi. In: COLLINS, JAMES T. / STEINHAUER, HEIN (eds.): Endangered Languages and Literatures in South-East Asia. Leiden: KITLV Press. [Prereleased PDF: https://web.archive.org/web/20040730160714/http://www.linguistics.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/~himmelmann/LG_ENDANGERment_centralsulawesi.pdf ].
KASENG, SYAHRUDDIN et al.: Bahasa-Bahasa di Sulawesi Tenggah. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa / Departemen Pendidikian dan Kebudayaan, 1979. (= Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa; Seri Bb 13).
MCGLYNN, JOHN H. et al. (eds.): Indonesian Heritage: Language and Literature. Reprint. Singapore: Archipelago Press, 1999. (= Indonesian Heritage Series; 10).
RAHIM, ABDILLAH A. & BASRI, H. HASAN & EFENDY, ALI. 1998. Tata bahasa Kaili. Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa, Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
SARO, AHMAD et al.: Struktur Sastra Lisan Kaili. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikian dan Kebudayaan, 1991.
SNEDDON, J[AMES] N[EIL]: Northern Sulawesi. In: Wurm (ed.), Map 43.
SOFYAN, ANGHUONG ALIAS et al.: Morfologi dan Sintaksis Bahasa Kaili. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa / Departemen Pendidikian dan Kebudayaan, 1979. (= Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa; Seri Bb 21).
STEINHAUER, HEIN (ed.): Papers in Austronesian Linguistics No. 3. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, The Australian National University, 1996. (= Pacific Linguistics; A; 84).
VAN DEN BERG, RENÉ: The demise of focus and the spread of conjugated verbs in Sulawesi. In: STEINHAUER (ed.), p. 89-114.
WURM, STEPHEN A. (ed.): Language atlas of the Pacific area. Part 2. Japan area, Taiwan (Formosa), Philippines, Mainland and insular South-East Asia. Canberra: Australian Academy of the Humanities, 1983. Maps 25-47 (= Pacific linguistics; C; 67)

Internet

Additional source: Interviews with three (bilingual) speakers of Ledo; in Jakarta (March/April 2001) and via icq chat (April through August 2001).

Notes

In general, the abbreviations and conventions suggested by the Leipzig Rules for Interlinear Morpheme-by-Morpheme Glosses were used.^[4] In addition to that, the following abbreviations were used: