This page lists the main trends and events in Jewish mysticism. Further explanation is given in History of Jewish mysticism in the context of traditional vs. academic views on the antiquity of Kabbalah.
Academic study of Jewish mysticism, especially since Gershom Scholem's Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (1941), draws distinctions between different forms of mysticism which were practiced in different eras of Jewish history. Of these, Kabbalah, which emerged in 12th-century southwestern Europe, is the most well known, but it is not the only typological form, nor was it the first form which emerged. Among the previous forms were Merkabah mysticism (c. 100 BCE – 1000 CE), and Ashkenazi Hasidim (early 13th century) around the time of the emergence of Kabbalah.
Kabbalah means "received tradition", a term which was previously used in other Judaic contexts, but the Medieval Kabbalists adopted it as a term for their own doctrine in order to express the belief that they were not innovating, but were merely revealing the ancient hidden esoteric tradition of the Torah. This issue has been crystalized until today by alternative views on the origin of the Zohar, the main text of Kabbalah, attributed to the circle of its central protagonist Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai in the 2nd century CE, for opening up the study of Jewish Mysticism.[1] Traditional Kabbalists regard it as originating in Tannaic times, redacting the Oral Torah, so do not make a sharp distinction between Kabbalah and early Rabbinic Jewish mysticism. Academic scholars regard it as a synthesis from the Middle Ages, when it appeared between the 13th-15th centuries, but assimilating and incorporating into itself earlier forms of Jewish mysticism, possible continuations of ancient esoteric traditions,[2] as well as medieval philosophical elements.
The theosophical aspect of Kabbalah itself developed through two historical forms: "Medieval/Classic/Zoharic Kabbalah" (c.1175 – 1492 – 1570), and Lurianic Kabbalah (1569 – today) which assimilated Medieval Kabbalah into its wider system and became the basis for modern Jewish Kabbalah. After Luria, two new mystical forms popularised Kabbalah in Judaism: antinomian-hereticalSabbatean movements (1666 – 18th century), and Hasidic Judaism (1734 – today). In contemporary Judaism, the only main forms of Jewish mysticism which are practiced are esoteric Lurianic Kabbalah and its later commentaries, the variety of schools of Hasidic Judaism, and Neo-Hasidism (incorporating Neo-Kabbalah) in non-OrthodoxJewish denominations.
Two non-Jewish syncretic traditions also popularized Judaic Kabbalah through their incorporation as part of general Western esoteric culture from the Renaissance onwards: theological Christian Cabala (c. 15th – 18th century) which adapted Judaic Kabbalistic doctrine to Christian belief, and its diverging occultist offshoot Hermetic Qabalah (c. 19th century – today) which became a main element in esoteric and magical societies and teachings. As separate traditions of development outside Judaism, drawing from, syncretically adapting, and different in nature and aims from Judaic mysticism, they are not listed on this page.
Traditional/pseudepigraphical/anonymous esoteric Merkabah mysticism Throne and Hekhalot Palaces ascent literature and methods. Text protagonists are early Tannaic Rabbis, though texts academically dated variously from Talmudic 100–500 to Gaonic 400–800 periods, and sectarian/rabbinic origins debated: Earlier texts: 3 Enoch Hekhalot Rabbati (The Greater Palaces) Hekhalot Zutari (The Lesser Palaces) Merkavah Rabbah (The Great Chariot) Later texts: Shi'ur Qomah (Divine Dimensions) Mystical speculations of the Geonim
Maaseh Bereshit – Creation speculation text. Describes 10 sephirot, though without their significance to later Kabbalah. Received rationalist interpretations before becoming a source text for Kabbalah: Sefer Yetzirah (Book of Formation)
Alternative philosophical vs. mythological interpretations of Theosophical Kabbalah: "Neoplatonic" quasi-philosophical hierarchy, and Jewish-"Gnostic" mythological interest in sexual theurgic and demonic dualism motifs. Centred in Spain's Kabbalistic golden age:
The Zohar in Spain from c.1286: Zohar literature (Book of Splendour) late 1200s–1400s. Castile's gnostic culmination. Canonised as Kabbalah's central poetic visionary scripture. Later strata (Ra'aya Meheimna, Idrot) are most esoteric and anthropomorphic. Subsequent Zohar exegesis dominated other Kabbalah traditions. Possible Kabbalists in Zohar circle:[13] Moses de León Todros ben Joseph Abulafia and others
Kabbalistic scholarship: Joseph Gikatilla – Shaarei Orah (Gates of Light) c.1290 Spain Sefer HaTemunah (Book of the Figure) 13th–14th century influential doctrine in Kabbalah of Cosmic Cycles, later rejected by Cordovero and Luria[14] Bahya ben Asher Torah commentary
Medieval Meditative Kabbalah developed its own traditions.[15]Abraham Abulafia's Ecstatic-Prophetic Kabbalah, his Maimonidean alternative competitor to Theosophical Kabbalah, embodies the non-Zoharic ecstatic stream in Spanish Kabbalism. Re-imagining Judaism's prophetic techniques, it remained marginal to mainstream Kabbalah, but established a following in east Mediterranean:
Abulafian Prophetic Kabbalah school: Abraham Abulafia Mediterranean area late 13th century Judah Albotini Jerusalem 15th–16th century
Other mystical elements in early modern Jewish philosophy: Judah Leon Abravanel (Leone Ebreo) Portuguese-Italian early 1500s "Dialogues of Love" Platonism
The 2 definitive systemisations of Kabbalah, in latter 1500s Safed-Galilee: 1 Quasi-Rational: Moses Cordovero (Ramak) – Pardes Rimonim. Cordoverian systemisation of Medieval Kabbalah until 1570 2 Supra-Rational: Isaac Luria (the Ari) – new post-Medieval Lurianic systemisation taught 1570–1572
Other Kabbalists of the Safed mystical and scholarly renaissance: Joseph Karo central legalist and mystic diarist Shlomo Alkabetz Hayim Vital main Lurianic compiler and other writings Safed Meditative Kabbalah: Vital – Shaarei Kedusha (Gates of Holiness), Luria – Yichudim method
Esoteric Lurianism, the second of Kabbalah's two systems of theosophy after Medieval-Cordoverian, incorporating dynamic myth of exile and redemption in divinity taught by Isaac Luria 1570–1572. Other post-medieval popularising/ethical Kabbalah based itself on the more exoteric system of Moses Cordovero:
Disciples compile Kitvei Ari Lurianic thought: Hayim Vital – Etz Hayim (Tree of Life) Israel Sarug spread Lurianism in Europe Lurianic exegesis and meditative methods dominated other post-medieval Kabbalah trends
Kabbalistic renewal and scholarship: Abraham Azulai Chaim ibn Attar (Or ha-Hayim) Torah commentary Moshe Chaim Luzzatto (Ramchal) Italian early 18th century mystical-messianic circle, new public dissemination and revelation of Kabbalah Joseph Ergas
Eastern European mystical revival movement, popularising and psychologising Kabbalah through Panentheism and the Tzadik mystical leader. Neutralised messianic danger expressed in Sabbateanism: Pre-Hasidic origins: Baal Shem Eastern Europe Practical Kabbalists Tzadikim Nistarim mythology
Haskalah Jewish Enlightenment promoted critical Rationalism, strongly opposing Kabbalistic and Hasidic anti-modern mysticism. However, moderate Maskilim began scholarly investigation of Jewish mystical texts, and adapted Haskalah to Orthodox religiosity, while modern Jewish philosophy encountered universalist intellectual mystical elements in German Idealism. Late 1800s East Europe shift to Jewish political movements awakened secular Jewish cultural spirituality:
Elijah Benamozegh 1800s Universalist, modern interpretation of Kabbalah, continuing Italian Jewry's fusion of Kabbalah with general Humanist culture[20]
Innovative teachings and influence of Abraham Isaac Kook, pre-State Chief Rabbi of Mandate Palestine and poetic mystic. Harmonistic unity of religion and secularism, halakha and aggadah, activism and quietism, developed from Kabbalistic, Hasidic, philosophic and secular thought: Abraham Isaac Kook Neo-Hasidic monistic poetic mysticism beyond Kabbalah and Philosophy[26] Atchalta De'GeulahReligious Zionism Rav Kook's partial influence on Modern Orthodox Judaism[27]
Critical-historical study of Jewish mystical texts began in 19th century, but Gershom Scholem's school in the mid-20th century founded the methodological disciple in academia, returning mysticism to a central position in Jewish historiography and Jewish studies departments. Select historian examples:
^In Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (1941), Gershom Scholem rejected the possibility of original ancient source texts for the Zohar. In Kabbalah: New Perspectives (1990), Moshe Idel reassessed this, seeing implicit continuity between options in ancient jewish mystical ideas (including orthodox Rabbinic and heterodox Jewish Gnostic), and the medieval emergence of Kabbalah
^Structure of the table based on an expanded version of the table in Kabbalistic Metaphors: Jewish Mystical Themes in Ancient and Modern Thought, Sanford L. Drob, Jason Aronson, 2000; "The Historical Context" p.2-4
^There is academic debate whether Prophetic Judaism is phenomenologically a mysticism. While the prophets differed from many (not Hasidic) Jewish mystics in their social role, there are mystical passages in the prophetic books; eg. Ezekiel 1 became the basis of Merkabah mysticism. The Talmud says that there were hundreds of thousands of prophets among Israel: twice as many as the 600,000 Israelites who left Egypt; but most conveyed messages solely for their own generation, so were not reported in scripture (Judaism 101-Prophets and Prophecy). Scripture identifies only 55 prophets of Israel. In Meditation and the Bible, Aryeh Kaplan reconstructs meditative-mystical methods of the Jewish prophetic schools.
^Kabbalah - A Guide for the Perplexed, Pinchas Giller, Continuum 2011, p 11-12, 14: Mysticism that later evolved into Kabbalah began when prophecy ended. The activities of the prophets and their followers did not cease with the last "accredited" Hebrew prophets, Hagai, Zecharia and Malachi. Their students didn't know their masters would be remembered as prophets, while they wouldn't. Prophetic activity continued. Their students did their thing, which probably consisted of meditation, speculation over the political fate of the Jews and mystical visions of God and the heavenly host. They got their ideas from their new access to the Bible, which had been organised in the Babylonian exile by Ezra the Scribe, who, in order to save Judaism, popularly replaced the Temple cult with a sacred book cult. Jews began to be scattered, but besides yearning for Israel and the Temple, they channelled their spiritual urges into mystical speculation and esoteric exegesis of scripture. This "unaccredited" prophetic activity evolved into the Merkabah and Bereishit mysticism of the Talmudic era rabbis
^There is academic debate about how the mystical references in early exoteric Rabbinic literature relate to, or the degree it can be identified with, the mysticism and methods of subsequent esoteric Merkabah-Hekhalot texts.
^Representative of academic differentiation between elite and popular/common jewish views and practices of magic: "It should be stated from the very beginning that the following typology deliberately excludes the more popular magic among the Jews, which apparently continued to be practiced in the same manner as for hundreds of years beforehand." Quoted in Jewish Magic from the Renaissance Period to Early Hasidism, Moshe Idel
^Maimonides' Confrontation with Mysticism, Menachem Kellner, Littman Library: describes Judah Halevi as "Proto-Kabbalistic" in his conception of prophecy and Jewish chosenness in the Kuzari
^While Menachem Kellner reads Maimonides as anti-"Proto-Kabbalah" (Maimonides' Confrontation with Mysticism, Littman Library), David R. Blumenthal (Philosophic Mysticism and anthologies) reads Maimonides as a rationalist mystic: "The thesis of the book is that medieval philosophers had a type of religious mysticism that was rooted in, yet grew out of, their rationalist thinking. The religious experience of "philosophic mysticism" was the result of this intellectualist and post-intellectualist effort." ([1]Archived 2014-09-15 at the Wayback Machine[2]Archived 2013-06-02 at the Wayback Machine)
^The Dream of the Poem: Hebrew Poetry from Muslim and Christian Spain, 950-1492, translated edited and introduced by Peter Cole, Princeton University Press 2007
^Gershom Scholem's magisterial Origins of the Kabbalah (Princeton University Press, edited by R. J. Zwi Werblowsky, from Scholem's work of 1962) explores the consequentially seminal question of how "gnostic mythology" emerged from within the heart of 12th century orthodox Rabbinic Judaism, including its geographical coincidence with Christian dualistic Catharism of Languedoc. Subsequent scholarship has questioned Scholem's theses and historiography, which attribute internal changes in Jewish thought to reactions to external historical processes: Eliezer Schweid's Judaism and mysticism according to Gershom Scholem: A critical analysis and programmatic discussion (Scholars Press, Atlanta 1985); Joseph Dan's Gershom Scholem and the mystical dimension of Jewish history (New York UP, 1987); Moshe Idel's Kabbalah: New Perspectives (Yale University Press, 1990). Idel, the first to establish a revisionist new historiographical alternative paradigm of Kabbalah after Scholem's, attributes changes in Jewish thought to the internal development of implicit potentials from earlier Jewish sources, as well as exploring the experiential and ecstatic elements motivating Jewish mystical ideas.
^Joseph DanKabbalah: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press 2005. Despite the diverse traditions within Kabbalah, Dan characterises Kabbalah as generally describing 10 mythic dynamic powers in the Divine, generally treated as hypostases (though Abraham Abulafia's anti-theosophical Ecstatic Kabbalah treats them as psychological); attribution of male or female qualities to particular Divine powers; and the theurgic influence of man upon the supernal attributes.
^Kabbalah - A Guide for the Perplexed, Pinchas Giller, Continuum 2011, p 27-30: The Zohar "book" remained a snowballing collection of multiple materials during its development, including later strata Tiqqunei ha-Zohar and Ra'aya Meheimna. The process of collecting and editing texts continued to the late 1500s. Scholem's attribution of the main body of the Zohar to single authorship of Moses de Leon dominated 20th century scholarship. However, recent scholarship of Yehudah Liebes, Ronit Meroz and others, has served to blur the identity of the Zohar as a single composition. A collective view has emerged attributing the Zohar to a series of authors over a century and a half in Spain, and possibly including some ancient materials. If the Zohar did emerge from de Leon's study, his role was at best ancillary, recording notes of a Kabbalist circle that remains mysterious, possibly including Todros Abulafia or his son Yosef, Yosef of Hamadan, Yosef Gikatilla, Yosef Angelet and others, arguably stronger and more influential than de Leon
^Traditionalist historiography Meditation and Kabbalah, Aryeh Kaplan, Samuel Weiser publishers; overview of the Meditative schools in Kabbalah. Some medieval Meditative Kabbalists also followed the Theosophical Kabbalah, though not its greatest exponent Abulafia in his esoteric system. In turn, the 16th century Safed culmination of theosophy by Cordovero, Luria and Vital dominated and subsumed the previous divergent Kabbalistic streams into their teachings, drawing from the earlier schools. After Luria, Meditative Kabbalah followed his new system of Yichudim. In Kabbalah: New Perspectives, Yale University Press 1988, chapter 5 Mystical Techniques, Moshe Idel reinstates the meditative and experiential dimensions of Kabbalah as an inherent companion to the theosophical in academic historiography. Kabbalists often attributed their theosophical doctrines to new meditative revelations.
^[3] Describes Renaissance era jewish communities in Italy: indigenous Italian jews, immigrant Sephardi and Ashkenazi groups, and their respective views of general Italian intellectual culture; indigenous communities and Rabbinic leadership being receptively in favour, a tradition that continued through modernity.
^Cultural Relationships between Jews and Non-Jews in Fifteenth-Century Italy: The Case of Yohanan Alemanno For Alemanno, "Florence, the new Constantinople, was the place where the study of philosophy and the natural and divine law allowed...a holy wisdom...a universal system of thought, in which politics and sciences could coexist with religion and mysticism, would become the basis for the revival of a 'jewish nation'. Moses -regarded by humanists as one of the Oriental prisci philosophi (ancient philosophers) who had received intellectual secrets directly from God- was to Alemanno also the model of the perfect Platonic ruler..."
^Astral Dreams in R.Yohanan Alemanno's Writings, Moshe Idel, introduction: "A long Jewish medieval tradition, represented by tens of authors in the 14th and 15th centuries who composed their writings in Spain and Provence, which gradually interpreted all the main aspects of Judaism in astro-magical terms culminated, from many points of view, in Alemanno's writings. His thought represents one of the moments of the move of this Hermetic interpretation of Judaism from West to East; By East I mean the land of Israel, where the astro-magical interpretations become evident in the writings of the 16th century Kabbalists R.Joseph Albotini, R.Shlomo Al-Qabetz, R.Moshe Cordovero and his disciples. Under their impact, 18th century Hasidism in Eastern Europe absorbed important Hermetic elements, which had been attenuated and transformed."
^ abTorah Lishmah-Torah for Torah's Sake, Norman Lamm, Ktav 1989; summarised in Faith and Doubt, Norman Lamm, chapter "Monism for Moderns". Identifies Chaim of Volozhin as the main kabbalistic-theological theorist of Mitnagdism, and Schneur Zalman of Liadi as the main theorist of Hasidism, based on interpretation of Lurianic Tzimtzum. For Chaim Volozhin, Divine immanence is monistic (the acosmic way God looks at the world, reserved for man only in elite kabbalistic prayer) and Divine transcendence is pluralistic (man relates to God through pluralistic Jewish law), leading to Mitnagdic transcendent Theism and popular ideological Talmudic study focus. For Shneur Zalman, Immanence is pluralistic (man relates to mystical Divine immanence in pluralist Nature) and Transcendence is monistic (Habad Hasidic meditation on acosmic nullification of world from God's perspective), leading to Hasidic Panentheism and popular mysticism Deveikut fervour amidst materiality
^The Roots of Jewish Consciousness, Volume Two: Hasidism, Erich Neumann written manuscript 1940-1945, first published Routledge 2019, edited by Ann Conrad Lammers, foreword by Moshe Idel
^Magic of the Ordinary: Recovering the Shamanic in Judaism, North Atlantic Books
^Reasoning After Revelation: Dialogues in Postmodern Jewish Philosophy, Steven Kepnes – Peter Ochs – Robert Gibbs, Westview Press 2000. "Postmodern Jewish thinkers understand their Jewishness differently, but they all share a fidelity to what they call the Torah and to communal practices of reading and social action that have their bases in rabbinic interpretations of biblical narrative, law, and belief. Thus, postmodern Jewish thinking is thinking about God, Jews, and the world—with the texts of the Torah—in the company of fellow seekers and believers. It utilizes the tools of philosophy, but without their modern premises." Commentaries in later chapters describe the contribution of Kabbalistic mythological thinking to this project.
^Rabbi Abraham Isaac Kook and Jewish Spirituality, edited by Lawrence J. Kaplan and David Shatz, NYU Press 1994. Introduction describes Rav Kook as the most innovative jewish mystic of the 20th century. Essays study his thought through the lenses of jewish mysticism, philosophy, aggada, halakha, poetry, sciences, society, Zionism and messianism. Lawrence Fine describes Kook's thought as "Neo-Hasidic", extrapolating Hasidic monistic ideas to their fullest implications beyond traditional Judaic boundaries of religion, secularism and Haredi theological anti-Zionism
^Faith Without Fear: Unresolved Issues in Modern Orthodoxy, Michael J. Harris, Vallentine Mitchell 2016. Chapter 3 "Modern Orthodoxy and Jewish Mysticism", as well as other chapters, discusses unresolved tensions and intellectual options open to Modern Orthodox jews, who are often characterised by non-mystical Rationalist inclinations. Rav Kook offers a potential model of harmonisation with mysticism. Harris hilights the fundamentalist dangers and spiritualising opportunities a critical modernist mysticism could offer Modern Orthodoxy. Norman Lamm in Faith and Doubt: Studies in Traditional Jewish Thought, chapter "Monism for Moderns", also draws on Rav Kook's mystical holism. Tamar Ross develops an evolving Modern / Open Orthodox feminist approach to the problems of revelation, developed from the theology of Rav Kook, in Expanding the Palace of Torah – Orthodoxy and Feminism