This list of fossilreptiles described in 2023 is a list of new taxa of fossil reptiles that were described during the year 2023, as well as other significant discoveries and events related to reptile paleontology that occurred in 2023.
A member of Polyglyphanodontia. The type species is Y. yingliangia.
Squamate research
Redescription of Palaeogekko risgoviensis is published by Villa (2023), who confirms the validity of this species as a distinct taxon, and interprets it as a non-eublepharidgekkonoid of uncertain affinities.[22]
Thorn et al. (2023) describe new fossil material of Aethesia frangens from the Pleistocene of Australia, interpret it as a large-bodied (approximately 2.4 kg) blue-tongued skink, and transfer it to the genus Tiliqua.[23]
Lacertid, blanid and anguid fossil material, including one of the oldest records of the genus Blanus reported to date, is described from the Early Miocene localities Montaigu-le-Blin and Crémat (France) by Čerňanský (2023), expanding known spatial and temporal distribution of Blanuscf.gracilis during the Early Miocene.[24]
Redescription of Uquiasaurus heptanodonta is published by Scanferla & Díaz-Fernández (2023), who interpret the type series of this species as a fossil bone assemblage composed by more than one species of Liolaemus, extending known fossil record of the latter genus.[25]
Loréal et al. (2023) describe new fossil material of Pseudopus pannonicus from the Neogene localities across Moldova, Russia and Ukraine, including fossils from the Turolian localities Gaverdovsky and Volchaya Balka in North Caucasus representing the easternmost or some of the easternmost known occurrences of this species, and revise the diagnostic features of P. pannonicus.[27]
Georgalis, Mennecart & Smith (2023) describe two teeth of a probable member of the genus Varanus from the Miocene deposits from the Hüenerbach locality (Switzerland), representing of the oldest occurrences of the genus from Europe.[28]
A specimen of the ammoniteMammites nodosoides, preserved with bite traces interpreted as most likely resulting from a lethal attack of a mosasaur directed at the apertural part of the ammonite with the head and arm crown, is described from the Turonian Bílá Hora Formation (Czech Republic) by Mazuch et al. (2023).[29]
Evidence from tooth microwear of mosasaurs from the type area for the Maastrichtian, interpreted as indicative of preferences for vertebrate and/or invertebrate prey in different mosasaur taxa but not indicative of strict dietary partitioning, is presented by Holwerda et al. (2023).[30]
LeBlanc et al. (2023) report that tooth replacement in extant snakes occurs by resorption of dentine by odontoclasts from within the pulp of the tooth, and that this mechanism was already present in Yurlunggur and Portugalophis.[32]
A study on the evolution of the snake brain, based on data from extant and fossil taxa, is published by Macrì et al. (2023), who interpret their findings as indicative of a burrowing lifestyle with opportunistic behavior at the origin of the crown group of snakes.[33]
A palaeophiid vertebra tentatively referred to the genus Pterosphenus is described from the Eocene Ameki Formation (Nigeria) by Georgalis (2023), expanding known diversity of palaeophiids from Nigeria.[34]
Averianov (2023) describes new fossil material of Pterosphenus muruntau from the Eocene (Bartonian) deposits from the Dzheroi 2 locality in the Central Kyzylkum Desert (Uzbekistan), and considers P. muruntau to be a valid species.[35]
Shi et al. (2023) describe an assemblage of early Pliocene snake fossils entombed with the mammalian fauna from Houxushan (Queshan, Henan, China), and interpret the studied fossils as indicative of a warmer and more humid climate in this region during the early Pliocene.[37]
Bolet (2023) describes an assemblage of squamate fossils from the Eocene locality of Mazaterón (Spain), providing evidence of the persistence of glyptosaur and anguine anguids, iguanids and lacertids through most of the Iberian Eocene, and including one of the oldest records of amphisbaenians in Europe after the apparent gap in their European fossil record in the MP11–MP15 interval.[38]
Lofgren et al. (2023) describe new fossil material of squamates from the Uintan, Chadronian and Whitneyan strata in Montana (United States), including the first records of varanids, Calamagras and a possible member of the genus Peltosaurus from the Tertiary depositional basins of southwest Montana, and the first record of Aciprion formosum from the state and from the Whitneyan strata.[39]
Georgalis et al. (2023) describe fossil material of lizards and snakes from the Miocene localities in Anatolia (Turkey), including fossil remains tentatively referred to chameleons, potentially representing the oldest occurrences of chameleons from Asia reported to date.[40]
Ichthyosauromorphs
Ichthyosauromorph research
A study on the skull morphology of Hupehsuchus nanchangensis, based on data from new specimens from the Lower Triassic Jialingjiang Formation (China), is published by Fang et al. (2023), who find the shape of the skull roof and snout of H. nanchangensis to be highly convergent with modern baleen whales, and interpret Hupehsuchus as likely employing continuous ram filter feeding as in extant bowhead and right whales.[41]
Engelschiøn et al. (2023) use radiography and computed tomography to reveal taxonomically significant details of the skeletal anatomy of a mixosaurid specimen from the Middle Triassic Botneheia Formation (Svalbard, Norway), and interpret it as a member of the genus Phalarodon with affinities to P. atavus.[43]
A study on three gravid Mixosaurus specimens from the Middle Triassic Besano Formation at the Monte San Giorgio locality at the Swiss-Italian border is published by Miedema et al. (2023), who report that two of the studied specimens were preserved with fetuses with tail-first birth position while the third specimen was preserved with fetuses with head-first birth position, propose that a slight preference for tail-first birth likely arose at the base of the Merriamosauria, and argue that fetal orientation at birth in ichthyosaurs was more likely to be related to expulsion mechanics during birth or to maternal stress induced from the fetal orientation during pregnancy than to the need for reduction of asphyxiation risk.[44]
A study on the cranial ontogeny of Mixosaurus cornalianus, providing evidence of developmental patterns in the early ontogenetic stages that were reminiscent of the probable ancestral reptile condition, is published by Miedema et al. (2023).[45]
A study on the ecomorphological variation of skulls and teeth of members of the genus Temnodontosaurus, providing evidence of a range of configurations allowing prey to be captured and processed in different ways by members of different species and possibly indicative of niche partitioning, is published by Bennion et al. (2023).[46]
Redescription of the holotypes of Grendelius pseudoscythicus and G. zhuravlevi is published by Zverkov, Arkhangelsky & Stenshin (2023), who consider both species to be valid, indicating the presence of at least three species of Grendelius in the Middle Russian Sea during the latest Jurassic, and argue that there is insufficient evidence for synonymy between the genera Brachypterygius and Grendelius.[47]
Delsett et al. (2023) compare the ossified hyoid elements in ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaurs and toothed whales, and report that, based on hyoid shape, suction feeding seems to never have evolved in ichthyosaurs.[48]
Reassessment of the history and identity of the ichthyosaur specimens from the Posidonia Shale housed in the Paleontological Collection of Tübingen University is published by Stöhr & Werneburg (2023).[49]
Motani & Shimada (2023) providence evidence that derived ichthyosaurs, modern whales, tunas and lamnid sharks share characteristics of caudal vertebrae related to the mechanics of thunniform swimming, and allowing identifications of thunniform swimmers in the fossil record.[50]
A polycotylid. The type species is U. specta. Announced in 2023; the final article version will be published in 2024.
Sauropterygian research
A study on the ecomorphological diversification of Middle Triassic eosauropterygians, providing evidence of evolution of anatomically diverse skulls and teeth (likely related to different feeding specializations of pachypleurosauroids, nothosauroids and pistosauroids) and more homogeneous postcranial skeletons, as well as evidence of regional variations in morphological diversity, is published by Laboury et al. (2023).[58]
An aggregation of bones of at least three individuals of Keichousaurus hui, interpreted as a likely regurgitalith probably produced by a near-shore sauropterygian such as Nothosaurus or Lariosaurus, is described from the Middle Triassic Xingyi Fauna (Guizhou, China) by Ye, Sun & Yao (2023).[59]
Li et al. (2023) report preservation of the digestive tract with food remains in specimens of Keichousaurus hui from the Zhuganpo Member of the Falang Formation (China), and reconstruct the internal distribution and organ composition of the digestive tract of K. hui.[60]
Morphological and histological evidence interpreted as indicative of puberty as one of the four life stages is reported in the fossil material of Keichousaurus by Li et al. (2023).[61]
New specimen of Yunguisaurus, providing new information on the anatomy of the skull in this taxon, is described from the Ladinian Zhuganpo Member of the Falang Formation (China) by Lu et al. (2023).[62]
Reassessment of Trematospondylus macrocephalus is published by Sachs et al. (2023), who interpret the taxon as a dubious rhomaleosaurid.[63]
Teeth of freshwater pliosauroids, possibly representing a transitional taxon between the Middle Jurassic and Late Jurassic pliosaurids, are described from the Middle Jurassic Xintiangou Formation (China) by Ma et al. (2023).[64]
Fossil material of pliosaurids, including two specimens whose skull size approached that of Megacephalosaurus, is described from the Cenomanian and Turonian of the Yezo Group (Hokkaido, Japan) by Sato et al. (2023).[66]
A study on the skeletal anatomy and phylogenetic relationships of Luskhan itilensis is published by Fischer et al. (2023).[67]
Redescription of "Plesiosaurus" bavaricus and description of the fossil material of a member of the same or related species from the Posidonia Shale (Germany) is published by Sachs, Abel & Madzia (2023), who interpret the studied fossils as indicative of the presence of a distinct plesiosaur taxon in the upper Lower Jurassic of the Posidonia Shale of Germany.[68]
D'Angelo et al. (2023) describe a mature elasmosaurid specimen from the Maastrichtian Calafate Formation (Argentina), with histological features of the phalanx and vertebral apophysis otherwise found in juvenile individuals, and interpret this finding as contradicting the hypotheses that proposed that the maturation of elasmosaurid involved a shift in bone density which was related to migration from coastal waters to the open sea.[69]
O'Gorman & Otero (2023) revise the fossil material of Late Cretaceous short-necked plesiosaurs from New Zealand, and argue that only one specimen from the Tahora Formation and one from the Conway Formation can be confidently referred to the family Polycotylidae, while another specimen from the Conway Formation and one specimen from uncertain locality can be referred to this family with doubts.[70]
May et al. (2023) describe possible pliosaurid and possible small-bodied plesiosaur fossil material from the Upper Jurassic Malone Formation, representing the first Jurassic vertebrate fossils from Texas reported to date.[71]
Fossil trackway probably produced by a plesiosaur swimming in contact with the mud at the bottom of the sea is described from the Upper Jurassic–Lower Cretaceous Maiolica Formation (Italy) by Natali & Leonardi (2023), who name a new ichnotaxon Coneroichnus marinus.[72]
A study on the skeletal maturity status of known plesiosaur skeletons, indicating that determination of the ontogenetic stage of the studied specimens may be confounded by paedomorphism (especially in later taxa), is published by Araújo & Smith (2023).[73]
A study on the body size evolution in turtles is published by Farina et al. (2023), who interpret their findings as indicating that body size was influenced by lineage-specific specializations, such as habitat choice, rather than global trends.[86]
A study on the topological organization of the turtle skull throughout the evolutionary history of turtles is published by Miller et al. (2023), who interpret their findings as indicating that turtles have a derived cranial topology which was established early in turtle evolutionary history and subsequently conserved.[87]
Szczygielski & Piechowski (2023) describe the anatomy of the limbs and girdles of Proterochersis, reporting the presence of a mosaic of characteristics suggesting either terrestrial or aquatic ecology.[88]
A study on the limb bone histology in Proterochersis porebensis and Proganochelys quenstedtii, providing evidence of general microstructural patterns typical for extant turtles and of faster growth during early life stages in P. quenstedtii than in P. porebensis, is published by Szczygielski et al. (2023).[89]
New specimen of Naomichelys speciosa, providing new information on the anatomy and intraspecific variation in this species, is described from the Lower Cretaceous Cloverly Formation (Montana, United States) by Lawver & Garner (2023).[90]
Joyce et al. (2023) describe fossil material of Helochelydra nopcsai from the Lower Cretaceous strata in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany), extending known geographic range of this species and providing new information on its anatomy.[91]
Tong et al. (2023) describe a skull of a member of the species Solemys gaudryi from the Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) Bastide Neuve locality (Var, France), providing new information on the skull anatomy of helochelydrid turtles.[92]
Chou et al. (2023) describe a new specimen of Chengyuchelys latimarginalis from the Upper Jurassic Shangshaximiao Formation (China), expanding known geographical distribution of this species and providing new information on its intraspecific variation.[93]
The first specimen of Solnhofia parsonsi preserving largely complete and articulated limbs is described from the KimmeridgianTorleite Formation (Germany) by Augustin et al. (2023), who interpret this finding as indicating that S. parsonsi lacked stiffened paddles otherwise present in more pelagic marine turtles, and argue against interpreting the presence flexible flippers in fossil turtles as evidence for freshwater lifestyle by itself.[94]
Pérez-García, Camilo & Ortega (2023) describe new fossil material of Hylaeochelys kappa from the TithonianFreixial Formation (Portugal), providing new information on the anatomy and intraspecific variability in this species.[95]
A specimen of Eodortokacf.morellana, representing both the oldest occurrence of the family Dortokidae reported to date and the first record of the group from the United Kingdom, is described from the Lower Cretaceous Wessex Formation by Jacobs et al. (2023).[96]
Cadena et al. (2023) describe new fossil material of Chelus lewisi from the Miocene Socorro Formation (Urumaco, Venezuela) and of Chelus colombiana from the La Victoria Formation (Tatacoa, Colombia), and interpret the anatomy of the studied fossils as supporting the validity of both species.[97]
Martín-Jiménez & Pérez-García (2023) present the reconstruction of the skull and neuroanatomical structures of the holotype of Euraxemys essweini.[98]
A study on the ecology of Araripemys barretoi is published by Batista, Carvalho & de la Fuente (2023).[99]
Martín-Jiménez & Pérez-García (2023) provide a three-dimensional reconstruction of the anatomical and neuroanatomical cranial structures of Neochelys arenarum.[101]
A study on the anatomy of the mandible of Glyptops ornatus is published by Evers (2023), who interprets G. ornatus as a likely active aquatic hunter.[102]
Description of a partial skeleton of Denazinemys nodosa from the Campanian Kaiparowits Formation (Utah, United States) and a study on the phylogenetic affinities of this taxon is published by Spicher et al. (2023).[104]
Description of the anatomy of the skull and mandible of Plastomenus thomasii, and a study on the phylogenetic relationships and the evolutionary history of softshell turtles, is published by Evers, Chapelle & Joyce (2023).[105]
Cadena & Combita-Romero (2023) describe protostegid fossil material from the Lower Cretaceous (Valanginian) Rosablanca Formation (Colombia), representing both the earliest protostegid record reported to date and the largest Early Cretaceous protostegid worldwide, providing evidence of early evolution of large size in protostegids.[107]
A study on the long bone microstructure of Protostega gigas is published by Wilson (2023), who interprets her findings as indicating that P. gigas, unlike the more basal protostegid Desmatochelys, had rapid bone growth patterns similar to those of extant leatherback sea turtles.[108]
Purported plant fossils from the Lower Cretaceous Paja Formation (Colombia), originally described as Sphenophyllum colombianum, are reinterpreted by Palma-Castro et al. (2023) as hatchling marine turtles, representing the first finding of hatchlings turtle carapaces from northwestern South America reported to date.[109]
Fossil material of a sea turtle is described from the LutetianSantiago Formation, California by Poust, Holroyd & Deméré (2023), providing evidence of the presence of sea turtles in North Pacific during the middle Eocene.[110]
Zvonok, Benitskiy & Danilov (2023) describe new fossil material of Tasbacka aldabergeni from the Paleogene (Paleocene or Ypresian) Kudinovka locality (Rostov Oblast, Russia), including the most complete postcranial skeleton of a member of this species, providing new information on its anatomy.[111]
A carapace of a sea turtle representing the oldest record of the genus Lepidochelys reported to date is described from the Miocene Chagres Formation (Panama) by Cadena, De Gracia & Combita-Romero (2023), who report evidence of exceptional preservation of bone microstructure, including remains of blood vessels, collagen fibers, osteocytes with possible DNA.[112]
A study on the diversification of tortoises throughout their evolutionary history is published by Silveira et al. (2023).[113]
A study on the bone histology of fossil and extant angulate tortoises from South Africa, providing evidence of impact of environmental conditions on the growth of studied tortoises, is published by Bhat, Chinsamy & Parkington (2023).[114]
Delfino et al. (2023) describe Late Pleistocene fossils representing the first fossil material of Testudo hermanni hermanni from Sicily reported to date.[115]
A study on the relationship of body size to climate and on the role of metabolism in governing size in turtles is published by Parker et al. (2023), who report that the Plio-Pleistocene fossil record of turtles from the Shungura Formation (Ethiopia) included tortoises which were significantly larger than any extant African taxon, but aquatic turtles did not reach significantly larger maximum sizes than extant eastern African turtles; the authors find the studied fossil record of turtles to be consistent with habitat reconstructions for the Shungura Formation, interpret it as indicating that temperature-dependent metabolism likely wasn't a dominant factor for body size sorting in turtles from the Shungura Formation, and argue that the extinction of the largest eastern African tortoises may have been driven, in part, by human exploitation.[116]
Revision of the fossil material of Paleogene turtles from Eastern Europe is published by Zvonok & Danilov (2023).[117]
A study on the bone histology of Chanaresuchus bonapartei and Tropidosuchus romeri from the Chañares Formation (Argentina) is published by Garcia Marsà et al. (2023), who interpret their findings as indicative of variability of the developmental patterns in the studied taxa, as well as suggestive of their terrestrial lifestyle.[123]
A study on the locomotor capabilities of Euparkeria capensis is published by Demuth, Wiseman & Hutchinson (2023), who conclude that it is unlikely that Euparkeria was facultatively bipedal, and was probably quadrupedal.[124]
Pohlmann et al. (2023) describe new cranial material of Procolophon trigoniceps from the Sanga do Cabral Formation (Brazil), preserving evidence of temporal fenestration, and interpret the recurrent presence and varying morphology of temporal fenestrae in P. trigoniceps as supporting its characterization as an anomalous trait within the species.[140]
New information on the anatomy of the palate and mandible of Youngina capensis is presented by Hunt et al. (2023), who interpret the anatomy of the studied bones as supporting the phylogenetic placement of Youngina as an early diverging neodiapsid.[144]
A study on the morphology of the femora of members of Drepanosauromorpha, interpreted as indicative of increased capacity for femoral adduction and protraction relative to most other Permo-Triassic diapsids, is published by Pritchard et al. (2023).[145]
A study on the anatomy of the hindlimbs of Megalancosaurus preonensis and M. endennae is published by Renesto & Saller (2023), who interpret the differences in the skeletal anatomy of the studied drepanosauromorphs as indicating that the two species may have exploited different microhabitats in the arboreal environment.[146]
Browstein et al. (2023) exclude Cryptovaranoides microlanius from the crown group of Squamata, and consider it to be a neodiapsid of unclear placement with possible affinities to early archosauromorphs.[147]
Roese-Miron et al. (2023) compare the endocasts of Clevosaurus brasiliensis and extant tuatara, reporting that the reptilian encephalization quotient of C. brasiliensis in much lower than that of the tuatara, and providing evidence of a previously undocumented neuroanatomical diversity among rhynchocephalians.[148]
A study comparing bone histology of Askeptosaurus italicus and an unnamed thalattosauroid from the Vester Formation (Oregon, United States), providing evidence of different growth patterns in the studied thalattosaurs, is published by Klein et al. (2023).[151]
Redescription of the holotype of Wayaosaurus bellus is published by Chai et al. (2023), who consider Miodentosaurus brevis to be a possible junior synonym of W. bellus, and interpret thalattosaur morphology as indicating that, unlike sauropterygians and ichthyosauriforms, thalattosaurs night have been adapted only to the nearshore environments.[152]
A study on the stable carbon, oxygen and sulfur isotope compositions of bones of two specimens of Odontochelys is published by Goedert et al. (2023), who interpret their findings as indicating that Odontochelys was herbivorous and lived in a coastal marine environment.[153]
Jiang et al. (2023) report the discovery of an embryo of a member of the genus Ikechosaurus from the Lower Cretaceous Jiufotang Formation (China) preserved inside a parchment-shelled egg, interpret the ossification sequence of the embryo as confirming the placement of choristoderans within Archosauromorpha, and interpret this finding as suggesting that the ancestral amniote displayed extended embryo retention, including viviparity.[154]
Spiekman & Mujal (2023) describe two specimens of Tanystropheus (belonging to the species T. hydroides and T. longobardicus) from the Middle Triassic Monte San GiorgioLagerstätte with completely severed necks, and interpret the studied specimens as likely victims of a predatory attack, providing evidence that the long neck of Tanystropheus might have been susceptible to predation.[156]
Redescription of Anisodontosaurus greeri is published by Foffa et al. (2023), who provide new information on the anatomy of this reptile, supporting its referral to the clade Trilophosauridae.[157]
A study on microwear patterns in teeth of trilophosaurids is published by Mellett et al. (2023), who interpret their findings as suggestive of niche partitioning in closely related trilophosaurids in the Norian American Southwest.[158]
Redescription of the skull of the holotype of Bentonyx sidensis, including description of previously obscured anatomical details, is published by Sethapanichsakul, Coram & Benton (2023).[159]
A study on tooth implantation in rhynchosaurs and on changes in their teeth and jaw morphology as they aged is published by Sethapanichsakul, Coram & Benton (2023), who interpret the fossil record of rhynchosaurs as indicative of two phases of diversification, first in the Anisian, and second following the Carnian pluvial episode.[160]
A study on the relationship between femoral microstructure and posture in extant reptiles, and on its implications for the reconstruction of the posture of extinct reptiles, is published by Gônet et al. (2023), who find that the posture can be reliably inferred for extinct reptile taxa that preceded and followed the quadruped/biped and sprawling/erect transitions, but also that the inferences are more questionable for taxa contemporary with these transitions.[162]
A study on the nasal passage shapes and nasal airflow patterns in extant diapsids, comparing simulated airflow patterns in nasal passages without soft tissues (representing the typical degree of nasal passage preservation in fossils) and with soft tissues, is published by Bourke & Witmer (2023), who interpret their findings as indicating that previous nasal passage reconstructions in extinct species might overestimate airway size, which might affect estimates of physiological capacities of the nasal passages.[163]
Hoffman, Hancox & Nesbitt (2023) describe an assemblage of teeth of diapsid reptiles from the Lower Triassic Burgersdorp Formation (South Africa), report the presence of seven tooth morphotypes which are distinct but show limited morphological disparity, and interpret this finding as confirming that the recovery of diverse ecosystems after the Permian–Triassic extinction event was delayed until the Middle or even the Late Triassic.[164]
Zverkov et al. (2023) describe Late Cretaceous reptile fossils from the Pyasina River, Tanama River and Kheta River basins (Siberia, Russia), representing the northernmost Cretaceous Eurasian occurrences of plesiosaurs, turtles and possibly mosasaurids reported to date, and including immature plesiosaur fossils which might indicate that the Late Cretaceous shallow waters in the studied area were a breeding and nursery area for plesiosaurs.[165]
A study on the competition for prey between Miocene mammalian and reptilian predators at La Venta (Colombia) is published by Wilson & Parker (2023), who interpret their findings as indicative of limited competition for resources among the carnivore guild compared to the most similar extant communities, a dominant role of crocodyliform predators in the studied community, and low predation pressure which might have resulted in overpopulation leading to feeding stress in the notoungulate species Pericotoxodon platignathus.[166]
^Čerňanský, A.; Smith, R.; Smith, T.; Folie, A. (2023). "Iguanian lizards (Acrodonta and Pleurodonta) from the earliest Eocene (MP 7) of Dormaal, Belgium: the first stages of these iconic reptiles in Europe". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 42 (4). e2184696. doi:10.1080/02724634.2023.2184696. S2CID257817600.
^Pimentel, A.; Audije-Gil, J.; Barroso-Barcenilla, F.; Berrocal-Casero, M.; Callapez, P. M.; de Juanas, S. O.; Segura, M. (2023). "On the occurrence of Carentonosaurus Rage and Néraudeau, 2004 (Squamata, Pythonomorpha) in the Iberian Cretaceous, with description of a new species from the uppermost middle Cenomanian of West Portugal". Cretaceous Research. 151. 105649. Bibcode:2023CrRes.15105649P. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105649. S2CID260024960.
^Carvalho, J. C.; Santucci, R. M. (2023). "A new fossil Squamata from the Quiricó Formation (Lower Cretaceous), Sanfranciscana Basin, Minas Gerais, Brazil". Cretaceous Research. 154. 105717. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105717.
^Yadav, R.; Bajpai, S.; Maurya, A. S.; Čerňanský, A. (2023). "The first potential cordyliform (Squamata, Scincoidea) from India (uppermost Cretaceous – lowermost Paleocene): an African lizard clade brings possible implications for Indo-Madagascar biogeographic links". Cretaceous Research. 150. 105606. Bibcode:2023CrRes.15005606Y. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105606. S2CID259774247.
^Konishi, T.; Ohara, M.; Misaki, A.; Matsuoka, H.; Street, H. P.; Caldwell, M. W. (2023). "A new derived mosasaurine (Squamata: Mosasaurinae) from south-western Japan reveals unexpected postcranial diversity among hydropedal mosasaurs". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 21 (1). 2277921. Bibcode:2023JSPal..2177921K. doi:10.1080/14772019.2023.2277921.
^Scanferla, A.; Díaz-Fernández, L. (2023). "Reassessment of Uquiasaurus heptanodonta, an iguanian lizard from the late Pliocene (Uquía Formation) of NW Argentina". Ameghiniana. 60 (6): 535–539. doi:10.5710/AMGH.01.09.2023.3577. S2CID261523182.
^Mazuch, M.; Košťák, M.; Mikuláš, R.; Culka, A.; Kohout, O.; Jagt, J. W. M. (2023). "Bite traces of a large, mosasaur-type(?) vertebrate predator in the lower Turonian ammonite Mammites nodosoides (Schlüter, 1871) from the Czech Republic". Cretaceous Research. 153. 105714. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105714.
^O'Gorman, J. P.; Bona, P.; Canale, J. I.; Tineo, D. E.; Fernández, M. S.; Cárdenas, M.; Reguero, M. (2023). "A new mosasaurine specimen (Squamata, Mosasauridae) from the Upper Cretaceous of Antarctica with comments on the Weddellian diversity of Mosasaurinae". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 47 (2): 211–220. Bibcode:2023Alch...47..211O. doi:10.1080/03115518.2023.2203739. S2CID258691668.
^Georgalis, G. L. (2023). "First potential occurrence of the large aquatic snake Pterosphenus (Serpentes, Palaeophiidae) from Nigeria, with further documentation of Pterosphenus schweinfurthi from Egypt". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 47 (3): 327–335. Bibcode:2023Alch...47..327G. doi:10.1080/03115518.2023.2217874. S2CID259422068.
^Averianov, A. O. (2023). "Pterosphenus muruntau – valid species of sea snakes (Squamata: Palaeophiidae) from the middle Eocene of Uzbekistan". Zoosystematica Rossica. 32 (1): 85–92. doi:10.31610/zsr/2023.32.1.85. S2CID259456317.
^Shi, J.; Wang, Y.; Messenger, K. R.; Jiangzuo, Q.; Chen, Y.; Jin, C. (2023). "Early Pliocene fossil snakes (Squamata, Colubroidea) with various teeth from the fissure deposit from Queshan, Henan, China". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. doi:10.1080/08912963.2022.2161382. S2CID255649762.
^Lofgren, D.; Hanneman, D.; Runkel, A.; Fong, P.; Hong, G.; Burdekin, J.; Chai, M.; Kan, Y.; Jorgensen, B. (2023). "New records of Eocene and Oligocene squamates from southwest Montana". Paludicola. 14 (3): 110–121.
^Georgalis, G. L.; Čerňanský, A.; Göktaş, F.; Alpagut, B.; Şarbak, A.; Mayda, S. (2023). "The antiquity of Asian chameleons—first potential Chamaeleonidae and associated squamate fauna from the Lower and Middle Miocene of Anatolia". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 42 (2). e2160644. doi:10.1080/02724634.2022.2160644. S2CID256349649.
^Bennion, R. F.; Maxwell, E. E.; Lambert, O.; Fischer, V. (2023). "Craniodental ecomorphology of the large Jurassic ichthyosaurian Temnodontosaurus". Journal of Anatomy. 244 (1): 22–41. doi:10.1111/joa.13939. PMC 10734653. PMID37591692. S2CID260969287.
^Zverkov, N. G.; Arkhangelsky, M. S.; Stenshin, I. M. (2023). "New Data on Late Jurassic Ichthyosaurs of the Genus Grendelius from European Russia". Paleontological Journal. 56 (11): 1459–1481. doi:10.1134/S003103012211020X. S2CID256618348.
^Armour Smith, E.; O'Keefe, F. R. (2023). "Occurrence of Styxosaurus (Sauropterygia: Plesiosauria) in the Cenomanian: implications for relationships of elasmosaurids of the Western Interior Seaway". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 21 (1). 2242846. Bibcode:2023JSPal..2142846A. doi:10.1080/14772019.2023.2242846. S2CID261147918.
^Ye, X.-J.; Sun, Z.-Y.; Yao, M.-T. (2023). "A Keichousaurus-bearing regurgitalite from the Middle Triassic Xingyi Fauna, Dingxiao of Xingyi City, Guizhou, South China". Palaeoworld. 33 (2): 363–373. doi:10.1016/j.palwor.2023.03.009. S2CID257906301.
^Lu, H.; Zhou, M.; Fu, W.; Chai, J. (2023). "The cranial characters of a new specimen of Yunguisaurus from Middle Triassic Ladinian Xingyi fauna, Guizhou". Geological Bulletin of China. 42 (10): 1696–1705. doi:10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2023.10.007.
^Fischer, V.; Benson, R. B. J.; Zverkov, N. G.; Arkhangelsky, M. S.; Stenshin, I. M.; Uspensky, G. N.; Prilepskaya, N. E. (2023). "Anatomy and relationships of the bizarre Early Cretaceous pliosaurid Luskhan itilensis". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 198 (1): 220–256. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac108.
^Sachs, S.; Abel, P.; Madzia, D. (2023). "Unusual plesiosaur vertebrae from the Lower Jurassic Posidonia Shale of Germany". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 36 (10): 2124–2132. doi:10.1080/08912963.2023.2242376. S2CID260994061.
^D'Angelo, J. S.; Marsà, J. A. G.; Agnolín, F. L.; Novas, F. E. (2023). "Biological implications of the bone microstructure of a new elasmosaurid (Sauropterygia, Plesiosauroidea) from the uppermost Cretaceous of Patagonia". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 36 (4): 719–727. doi:10.1080/08912963.2023.2180744. S2CID257316200.
^Kim, D. H.; Lee, Y.-N.; Ko, H.; Park, J.-Y.; Kim, S.-H.; Lee, S.; Jung, S.-H.; Kong, D.-Y. (2023). "The first adocid turtle in South Korea (Lower Cretaceous) and the early evolution of the Adocidae". Cretaceous Research. 151. 105665. Bibcode:2023CrRes.15105665K. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105665. S2CID260295679.
^Pappa, I.; Vlachos, E.; Moser, M. (2023). "A new species of a giant tortoise from Sandelzhausen (MN5, Burdigalian/Langhian boundary, Early/Middle Miocene, South Germany)". The Anatomical Record. doi:10.1002/ar.25280. PMID37358053. S2CID259249972.
^Lawver, D. R.; Garner, B. A. (2023). "Skeletal variation of the stem turtle Naomichelys speciosa (Testudinata: Helochelydridae): insights from a new specimen from the Lower Cretaceous Cloverly Formation of Montana". Cretaceous Research. 149. 105551. Bibcode:2023CrRes.14905551L. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105551. S2CID258125867.
^Chou, C.; Xing, L.; Wang, F.; Xie, X.; Tong, H. (2023). "A new Chengyuchelys latimarginalis record from the Upper Jurassic Shangshaximaio Formation of Sichuan Basin, China, and the intraspecific variation". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 36 (5): 992–1006. doi:10.1080/08912963.2023.2201932. S2CID258401161.
^Batista, D. L.; Carvalho, I. S.; de la Fuente, M. S. (2023). "Araripemys barretoi: Paleoecological analysis of a pelomedusoid Chelonia from the Lower Cretaceous of Araripe and Parnaíba basins, Brazil". Cretaceous Research. 148. 105503. Bibcode:2023CrRes.14805503B. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105503. S2CID256786671.
^Bogado, J. P.; Pereira, P. V. L. G. C.; de la Fuente, M. S.; Bergqvist, L. P. (2023). "New records of Testudines from the Presidente Prudente Formation of the Bauru group (Late Cretaceous), with a revised diagnosis for Roxochelys wanderleyi and palaeoichnological remarks". Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 128. 104478. Bibcode:2023JSAES.12804478B. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2023.104478. S2CID259379689.
^Smith, H. F.; Berg, M.; Adrian, B. (2023). "A well-preserved cranium from the Judith River Formation (Montana, USA) reveals the inner ear and neuroanatomy of a Campanian baenid turtle". The Anatomical Record. 306 (6): 1431–1451. doi:10.1002/ar.25185. PMID36899495. S2CID257438399.
^Cadena, E.-A.; Combita-Romero, D. A. (2023). "The onset of large size in Cretaceous marine turtles (Protostegidae) evidenced by new fossil remains from the Valanginian of Colombia". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 202 (1). doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad053.
^Silveira, I. O.; Liparini, A.; Martinez, P. A.; Eduardo, A. A. (2023). "The global Cenozoic diversification process of tortoises (Testudinidae)". The Anatomical Record. 306 (6): 1528–1536. doi:10.1002/ar.25182. PMID36951396. S2CID257694745.
^Delfino, M.; Fritz, U.; Bonfiglio, L.; Marino, L.; Ragni, C.; Insacco, G. (2023). "Late Pleistocene evidence for the presence of Hermann's tortoise (Testudo hermanni) in Sicily". Bollettino della Società Paleontologica Italiana. 62 (3): 289–299. doi:10.4435/BSPI.2023.11 (inactive 2024-11-20).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
^Datta, D.; Ray, S. (2023). "A giant phytosaur (Diapsida, Archosauria) from the Upper Triassic of India with new insights on phytosaur migration, endemism and extinction". Papers in Palaeontology. 9 (1). e1476. Bibcode:2023PPal....9E1476D. doi:10.1002/spp2.1476. S2CID257103850.
^Agnolín, F. L.; Aranciaga Rolando, A. M.; Chimento, N. R.; Novas, F. E. (2023). "New small reptile remains from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia increase morphological diversity of sphenodontids (Lepidosauria)". Proceedings of the Geologists' Association. 135: 36–44. doi:10.1016/j.pgeola.2023.09.007.
^Bhat, M. S.; Datta, D.; Ray, S.; Datta, P. M. (2023). "A new clevosaurid (Lepidosauria: Rhynchocephalia) from the Upper Triassic of India". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 43 (1). e2232833. doi:10.1080/02724634.2023.2232833. S2CID260525273.
^Liu, J. (2023). "The tetrapod fauna of the upper Permian Naobaogou Formation of China: 9. A new species of Gansurhinus (Reptilia: Captorhinidae) and a revision of Chinese captorhinids". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 42 (5). e2203200. doi:10.1080/02724634.2023.2203200. S2CID258606272.
^Wang, W.; Spiekman, S. N. F.; Zhao, L.; Rieppel, O.; Scheyer, T. M.; Fraser, N. C.; Li, C. (2023). "A new long-necked archosauromorph from the Guanling Formation (Anisian, Middle Triassic) of southwestern China and its implications for neck evolution in tanystropheids". The Anatomical Record. doi:10.1002/ar.25216. PMID37029530. S2CID258028261.
^Henrici, A. C.; Berman, D. S.; Sumida, S. S.; Huttenlocker, A. K. (2023). "Halgaitosaurus gregarius, a New Upper Carboniferous Araeoscelidian (Reptilia: Diapsida) from the Halgaito Formation, Bears Ears National Monument, Utah, USA". Annals of Carnegie Museum. 88 (3): 161–192. doi:10.2992/007.088.0301.
^Lu, Y.-T.; Liu, J. (2023). "A new tanystropheid (Diapsida: Archosauromorpha) from the Middle Triassic of SW China and the biogeographical origin of Tanystropheidae". Journal of Systematic Palaeontology. 21 (1). 2250778. Bibcode:2023JSPal..2150778L. doi:10.1080/14772019.2023.2250778.
^Sues, H.-D.; Schoch, R. R. (2023). "The oldest known rhynchocephalian reptile from the Middle Triassic (Ladinian) of Germany and its phylogenetic position among Lepidosauromorpha". The Anatomical Record. 307 (4): 776–790. doi:10.1002/ar.25339. PMID37937325.
^Pohlmann, K.; Cisneros, J. C.; Da-Rosa, Á. A. S.; Pinheiro, F. L. (2023). "Temporal fenestration in a Procolophon trigoniceps specimen (Procolophonoidea) from the Lower Triassic of Brazil". The Anatomical Record. 307 (4): 744–751. doi:10.1002/ar.25354. PMID37982365.
^Mueller, B. D.; Small, B. J.; Jenkins, X.; Huttenlocker, A. K.; Chatterjee, S. (2023). "Cranial anatomy of Libognathus sheddi Small, 1997 (Parareptilia, Procolophonidae) from the Upper Triassic Dockum Group of West Texas, USA". The Anatomical Record. 307 (4): 1421–1441. doi:10.1002/ar.25364. PMID38071453.
^Boyarinova, E. I.; Golubev, V. K. (2023). "Topographic Morphology of the Postcranial Osteoderm Cover of an Adult Scutosaurus tuberculatus (Amalitzky) (Pareiasaurina) from the Late Permian of Eastern Europe". Paleontological Journal. 56 (11): 1437–1458. doi:10.1134/S003103012211003X. S2CID256618503.
^Pritchard, A. C.; Irmis, R. B.; Olori, J. C.; Nesbitt, S. J.; Smith, N. D.; Stocker, M. R.; Turner, A. H. (2023). "The femora of Drepanosauromorpha (Reptilia: Diapsida): Implications for the functional evolution of the thigh of Sauropsida". The Anatomical Record. 306 (8): 2102–2118. doi:10.1002/ar.25160. PMID36847780. S2CID257217856.
^Roese-Miron, L.; Jones, M. E. H.; Ferreira, J. D.; Hsiou, A. S. (2023). "Virtual endocasts of Clevosaurus brasiliensis and the tuatara: Rhynchocephalian neuroanatomy and the oldest endocranial record for Lepidosauria". The Anatomical Record. 307 (4): 1366–1389. doi:10.1002/ar.25212. PMID36951279. S2CID257694276.
^Chai, J.; Lu, H.; Jiang, D.-Y.; Motani, R.; Druckenmiller, P. S.; Tintori, A.; Kelley, N. P. (2023). "Reidentification of Wayaosaurus bellus and the conservative trunk and tail shape of Thalattosauria". Historical Biology: An International Journal of Paleobiology. 36 (12): 2537–2556. doi:10.1080/08912963.2023.2264886.
^Zverkov, N. G.; Rogov, M. A.; Zakharov, V. A.; Danilov, I. G.; Grigoriev, D. V.; M., Košťák (2023). "Northernmost occurrences of plesiosaurs and turtles in the Upper Cretaceous of Eurasia". Cretaceous Research. 148. 105537. Bibcode:2023CrRes.14805537Z. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2023.105537. S2CID257654850.
_(17964617788).jpg)
