User talk:Mercy/2009

Hi, Mercy/2009! Welcome to Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes. If you need help, check out the Help section of Wikipedia, or leave a message on my talk page. Whenever leaving messages on talk pages, please remember to sign your name by typing four 'tildes' (like this: ~~~~); doing this makes your name and the date show up. Also, it helps if you write something in the box that says 'edit summary' whenever you change an article. Below are some useful links to make your time here simpler. If you make a short article please mark it with {{stub}}, our guideline is here: Stubs Happy editing! Razorflame 03:23, 8 June 2008 (UTC)Reply Getting Started How to: change a page • write Simple English articles Getting Help Administrators • Leaving a message for administrators Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Can this be checked? Saying where the idea came from • What Wikipedia is not Copyrights • Using images and Pictures Spam • Vandalism • Deletion policy The Community Assume good faith • Be kind Community Portal • Simple talk • TASERING Announcements • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Peer review • Cleanup • Editor review Other Useful templates • Stubs

Hi there. I've noticed that you created a bot account here on SEWP. I have also noticed that you have created a bot proposal for your bot. While I am not a bureaucrat, I can tell you what the bureaucrats will want before they will be able to grant your bot its' flag.

I've noticed that you've applied for a global flag already. Instead of making a proposal on this site, why not just wait to see if the global flag is approved first? That way, we can avoid the problem of your bot having 2 of the same flag :). They will also want to see your bot make some test edits as well. Make sure that you make these edits :). Cheers, Razorflame 15:53, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for your message. I've been waiting for the global bot flag for several days and it seems as if the stewards were quite reluctant to grant it. I'm about to make some test edits in a while. :-) Regards, --Mercy (talk) 16:01, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I've noticed you do quite a bit of vandal reverting - thanks! Did you know simple.wikipedia can grant non-admins rollback right? Let me know if you want it. Best wishes, Majorly ^talk 14:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for your offer, I'll bear it in mind. Best regards, --Mercy (talk) 17:14, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey, welcome to the site ;)

I've noticed that you've been doing some vandal fighting here. Could you please also warn users not to vandalise again when you do? I can show you some templates if you wish.

Also, I see Majorly has mentioned to Rollback flag - would you like it? It is easier to undo vandalism with it as it is just one click of a button.

If you ever need more help, just leave me a message.

Thanks, BG^7even 15:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for your message. I wanted to put some warning template to the vandal's talkpage but I didn't have time to look for a suitable one. :-) Next time not I'm going to forget about it. Cheers, --Mercy (talk) 18:36, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, you're welcome. If you do forget about it chances are another editor will pop along and add one, especially if the user continues. An easy way of warning users is to go to Special:Preferences and select the "Gadgets" tab, then turn "Vandal Warner" on. This adds a little sidebar below the search box when you edit a user's page, and you just click on the one you want. Hope that helps, again if you need anything drop me a line. Thanks, BG^7even 19:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

As a bit of a side note, Vandal Warner uses scripted windows to work, so if your internet options doesn't allow for these windows, you might have to allow them, otherwise, it will be quite hard to work them. Cheers, Razorflame 19:03, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've turned the Vandal Warner on and it seems to work fine. We have no gadgets like this on Czech projects I contribute to. I'm quite used to the buttons in my monobook.js though. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 22:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you want, you could request for Rollback at WP:RFRB. We do have non-administrator rollback enabled on this Wikipedia, and looking at your recent contributions, I believe that you will benefit the Wikipedia by being allowed rollback. Cheers, Razorflame 18:23, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I know. :-) I'm going to request for it later. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 18:24, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I would nominate you for rollback if I were able, but I believe that you have to request it yourself. Why not just get it over with and request it now? It will help you better be able to fight vandalism :). Cheers, Razorflame 18:26, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've been a little busy with my bot and other projects I contribute to. :-) The request has just been put. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 18:36, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi there Mercy. When you revert vandalism by a user, could you please warn them about it? That way, it helps to tell administrators when the user is ready for blocking or not. Cheers, Razorflame 18:45, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, if you mean this edit, it doesn't seem to be a vandalism. It looks like a newbie trying to contribute with some updated information. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 18:50, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

If that is the case, you shouldn't use rollback on that edit. Rollback is supposed to be only used for vandalism and nothing else. In the future, could you use the undo tool for reverting edits such as those? Thanks, Razorflame 18:53, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

No prob. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 18:54, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

No, rollback can be used for any kind of unconstructive edit, be it test or malicious. Majorly ^talk 20:19, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

But the edit was clearly none of those. I would probably assume good faith here. Razorflame 21:03, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

It didn't look very constructive to me, but htat's my opinion. Majorly ^talk 21:28, 8 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Regarding this, I leave adding interwiki on categories up to bots. · Tygrrr... 18:37, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Are there any bots that add interwiki links to a page/category that is not linked from any other Wikipedia? -- Mercy (☎|✍) 18:39, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't know. I don't know a whole lot about how bots function. · Tygrrr... 18:42, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, if a page/category is not linked from any other language version of Wikipedia, the bots are unable to add the interwiki links. You need to add at least one interwiki link for the bot to be able to synchronise the rest. Simply add the interwiki link to the English Wikipedia like I did and the bots will be able to do their job. Best regards, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 18:47, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

No offense, but the hundreds, if not thousands, of categories I've created all seem to have gotten interwiki added to them eventually. BotMultichill seems to have figured out a way to do it. If it's all the same to you, I think I'll keep doing what I'm doing. I don't see that I'm causing any harm and I work faster the way I'm doing it and thus enjoy it more. Please don't feel obligated to follow my new cats adding interwiki, but if it pleases you, then be my guest. Cheers! · Tygrrr... 19:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don´t mind it. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 08:14, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For all the hard and quick vandal reverts and QD's in the last few hours, great job! Hope you keep this up! Æåm Fætsøn /ˈaɪæm ˈfætsən/ 09:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh, thank you... :-) -- Mercy (☎|✍) 09:11, 4 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Keep up the great work! The Rambling Man (talk) 18:16, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

thanks :) -- Mercy (☎|✍) 18:17, 8 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, for helping to revert vandalism on the same page ;)--AleksA ツ 11:27, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome! Cheers, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 11:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Issue 6 - 28th April 2009 60,218 editors, 58,333 articles, 138,873 pages.
Announcements	♥	Administrators
Wikipedia now has 58,000 articles. Bobby Robson has been promoted to Very Good Article status Color of the day (police) has been promoted to Good Article status Hermann Göring has been promoted to Good Article status Ben Hall has been promoted to Good Article status Portman Road has been promoted to Good Article status Ernst Röhm has been promoted to Good Article status Joss Whedon has been demoted to regular article status Crich Tramway Village has been promoted to Very Good Article stats Ipswich Town F.C. has been promoted to Very Good Article stats Cuban Missile Crisis is up for demotion - comments are welcomed. Color blindness and Abortion are currently at Proposed Good Articles - your comments are welcomed. Mosque and Bloc Party are currently at Proposed Very Good Articles - your comments are welcomed. Wikipedia:Did you know has been revived - your input in nominating and reviewing hooks is needed to keep it alive! User Articles Kennedy - Article 5 Kennedy urges you for your help to keep Simple News alive in his fifth article. Yotcmdr - Article 6 For his sixth article, Yotcmdr speaks about P(V)GA, DYK, SN and Spoken articles. EhJJ - Article 1 In his debut article, EhJJ writes about the CC license and the impact of a possible change of copyright policy on the Simple English Wikipedia. Shappy - Article 2 Shappy talks about the growth of Simple, and its contrast from EN, in his second articls for Simple News.	[Subscribe] [Archives] [Discussion] [The Team]	Congratulations, Yotcmdr for passing a request for adminship! Congratulations to The Rambling Man for passing both a request for checkusership and a request for bureaucratship! Congratulations, Bluegoblin7 for passing a request for adminship! Commiserations go to Æåm Fætsøn who was unsuccessful in his request for adminship. Congratulations to Garden for passing a request for adminship! Good luck to EhJJ who has a current request for adminship! There is a discussion on-going on whether or not to remove the tools of eight admins. Please comment there to have your say! QandA The QandA. Every month, Kennedy interviews one of the Simple English Wikipedia's editors, asking them about themselves, and their opinions on Wikipedia. It is an exciting insight behind the anonymous face of an online username. This weeks interview is with Steve Crossin and was taken by guest interviewer Bluegoblin7. Click for Steve's interview! The Commander's Choice The Commanders's Choice. For every edition, Yotcmdr will be chosing articles that need creating, expanding or being attended to. Here is this edition's list (which are mostly P(V)GA: Mosque - Needs a little more work simplifying Color Blindness - A bit more work befor VGA India - A potential VGA candidate Abortion - A little work to bring up to standards Bloc Party - Could also make (V)GA

GoblinBot3 (talk) 18:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reverting it! --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 11:36, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome. :) -- Mercy (☎|✍) 11:40, 6 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I apologize I reverted your comment. I was not ready to go live yet, there is more I'd like to write. Cheers, NonvocalScream (talk) 16:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Regards, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 16:58, 6 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

You removed information I added to an article, even though it was properly sourced, did you not see the source at the Jelckama article? 193.172.170.26 (talk) 08:49, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

.Cd. Busken Huet, Het land van Rembrand. Studiën over de Noordnederlandsche beschaving in de zeventiende eeuw (2 delen in 3 banden). H.D. Tjeenk Willink, Haarlem 1882–1884}}

hah!

I think you should stop trolling and go play somewhere else. Thanks. Regards, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 08:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

No kidding. Seriously, i have sources, it should be in the article. racist! 193.172.170.26 (talk) 08:51, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Issue 7 - 8th June 2009 67,135 editors, 59,528 articles, 143,118 pages.
Announcements	♥	Administrators
Wikipedia has 59,000 articles! Color blindness has been promoted to Good Article status. Bloc Party has been promoted to Very Good Article status. Tropical Storm Barry (2007) has been promoted to Very Good Article status. Hurricane Ismael has been promoted to Good Article status. France has been demoted to regular article status. Mouthpiece (brass) has been demoted to regular article status. Cuban Missile Crisis has been demoted to regular article status. Wijerd Jelckama is currently at Proposed Good Articles - your comments are welcomed. Hermann Göring, Ludwig van Beethoven and Linux are currently at Proposed Good Articles - your comments are welcomed. There is an ongoing discussion about the introduction of Very Good Lists - your comments are welcomed. DYK is getting back up to speed with several contributions waiting for the Main Page. Please continue to show your support by reviewing and nomination hooks. There is an ongoing discussion about the introduction of an Arbitration Committee - your comments are welcomed. User Articles Yotcmdr - Article 7 For his seventh article, Yotcmdr speaks about Kennedy, (V)GAs and DYK.. Microchip08 - Article 1 For his first aticle, MC8 speaks about various things. EhJJ - Article 2 For his second article, EhJJ talks about the new CC-BY-SA dual license A Wikipedia Song I do not have an entry... A song written by Yotcmdr. Originally from a German song about Wikipedia. The idea first came from Barras. It was translated by Eptalon. Guitar, lyrics and vocals all done by Yotcmdr Problems playing this file? See media help.	[Subscribe] [Archives] [Discussion] [The Team]	Congratulations, EhJJ for passing a request for adminship! Commiserations go to Djsasso who was unsuccessful in his request for bureaucratship. Congratulations, Barras for passing a request for adminship! Congratulations, Mentifisto for passing a request for adminship! Congratulations, EVula for passing a request for adminship! Congratulations, Shappy for passing a request for adminship! Billz is currently up for deadminshp because of tool inactivity. Good luck to NonvocalScream who is having a request for adminship! QandA The QandA. Every month, Kennedy interviewed one of the Simple English Wikipedia's editors, asking them about themselves, and their opinions on Wikipedia. It was an exciting insight behind the anonymous face of an online username. Unfortunately, Kennedy has left us, and will obviously not be doing the QandA. Bluegoblin7 has taken it over. This weeks interview is with Juliancolton. Click here for Juliancolton's interview! The Commander's Choice The Commanders's Choice. For every edition, Yotcmdr will be chosing articles that need creating, expanding or being attended to. Here is this edition's list: Spoon Screwdriver Glass Swine Flu AC/DC

GoblinBot3 (talk) 11:29, 8 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Barras has just posted your RfA. Thought you would like to accept it. Pmlinediter  ^Talk 09:03, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have just accepted it. Sorry for the delay, I'm a little busy at the moment. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 09:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations, per your successful RfA, you are now an administrator. If you have any questions, do feel free to ask around. Chenzw  Talk  12:34, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congrats Mercy! You deserve it! :). Regards, Goblin 12:36, 21 June 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Kennedy!Reply

Thanks, guys! -- Mercy (☎|✍) 14:26, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well done! Now go and delete the main page :D Yotcmdr ^{=talk to the commander=} 16:20, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congrats Mercy! Barras (talk) 18:21, 21 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congrats Mercy. Please block all other sysops and delete the Main Page now. :P Pmlinediter  ^Talk 09:40, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, I'll bear that in mind... ;) -- Mercy (☎|✍) 10:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Congrats Mercy. I'm not surprised it was a unanimous decision (well, except for that one guy whose only other contribs were to oppose my RfA!) EhJJ^TALK 13:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

• Good luck! –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Issue 8 - 22th June 2009 69,053 editors, 59,757 articles, 144,395 pages.
Announcements	♥	Administrators
Earth and Ludwig van Beethoven are currently at Proposed Good Articles - your comments are welcomed. Hermann Göring is currently at Proposed Very Good Articles - your comments are welcomed. User Articles Yotcmdr - Article 8 For his eighth Simple News article, Yotcmdr talks about starting collaborative teams over the Summer. Shappy - Article 3 Shappy makes a short statement about the summer and its ample opportunity for writing articles at the Simple English Wikipedia in his third article. Bluegoblin7 - Article 5 In Article No. 5, Bluegoblin7 looks back over what 2009 has brought so far, and then looks to the future as to what still could come. Pmlinediter - Article 1 DYK, P(V)GA and more are the subject of Pmlinediter's debut article.	[Subscribe] [Issues] [Discussion] [The Team]	Congratulations, NonvocalScream for passing a request for adminship! Billz has had his administrator tools removed because of tool inactivity. Congratulations, Mercy for passing a request for adminship! QandA The QandA. Every month, a user will be interviewed by a member of the Simple News team. This idea was started by Kennedy and interviews have since been made by Bluegoblin7, Yotcmdr and Shappy This weeks interview is with Majorly. Click here for Majorly's interview! The Commander's Choice The Commanders's Choice. For every edition, Yotcmdr will be chosing articles that need creating, expanding or being attended to. Here is this edition's list: Glue Paper Elephant Video Book

GoblinBot3 (talk) 10:50, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

...for your help with that - my school Internet was being really slow!

However, can I ask that you tick the "Clean delete reasons" box in Special:Preferences under gadgets? It makes the logs cleaner, and also avoids the need for oversighting in the event that may be needed.

Regards,

Goblin 10:01, 24 June 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Kennedy!Reply

OK, done. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 10:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

When you delete articles that contain personal attacks, as Jacob black appears to have contained, please clear the "other/additional reason" field so that the "bad" part of the article doesn't get embedded in the deletion log. Thanks --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 15:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem, I've overlooked this. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 16:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

If you go into preferences on the gadget tab is a check box to have it do it automatically for you every time. -Djsasso (talk) 17:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, mercy

I've answered you at my talk page. please, have a look. thanks - ברי"א (talk) 21:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have protected Silvio Berlusconi temporarily. If it is POV pushing, warn the user and block if necessary, or use the talk page. Oysterguitarist 08:38, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Warning  Done by me. Pmlinediter  ^Talk 08:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello and thanks for your message. I've just asked the user to come up with some references. Regards, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 08:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Okay, well if they don't come up with references, then unprotect the page, and block if there are anymore problems. Thanks. Oysterguitarist 08:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, as a general rule Categories should have at least five pages to make them worthwhile
-Bluegoblin7

This is why I marked the category for quick deletion. --Terry ^{Talk - Changes} 12:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I think deleting such categories is rather a waste of time and energy when they can be populated later. But this is my personal opinion... -- Mercy (☎|✍) 12:20, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think Category:Scottish heraldry and Category:English heraldry should be deleted because the only article in both of them is also in the main category Category:Heraldry. --Terry ^{Talk - Changes} 12:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, the point is, when there are more articles created on these topics, the deleted categories will have to be recreated. And there is nothing bad on these two articles being also in the parent category. It is the same elsewhere. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 12:33, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The above two categories should definitely be deleted, and I have done so. This is per the QD criteria and category guidelines. The other Category that you QD tagged I would say is an exception to the rule as it is a very important category. There may also be other articles that are not correctly categorised. Regards, Goblin 12:37, 2 July 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Kennedy!Reply

		The Original Barnstar
		For Mercy for being so quick to revert vandalism that I haven't been able to get in one revert today. Keep up the good work Peterdownunder (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! :-) Have a nice day! -- Mercy (☎|✍) 13:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Issue 9 - 16th August 2026 1,831,833 editors, 284,257 articles, 946,431 pages.
Announcements	♥	Administrators
Wernher von Braun, London Underground 1967 Stock, Ludwig van Beethoven and Earth are at Proposed Good Articles Hurricane Ismael and Germany are at Proposed Very Good Articles Wikipedia now has 53,746 articles owing to the deletion of over 6,000 articles. User Articles Yotcmdr - Article 9 For his ninth Simple News article, Yotcmdr talks about BG7, a new Wikiproject and some new sections on Simple News including a story. Pmlinediter - Article 2 For his second article, Pmlinediter talks about stubs, mass deletion and Gobby. Swine Flu update As of Friday 3rd July 2009 89,922 cases of Swine Flu have been confirmed. 383 People have now died from it.	[Subscribe] [Archives] [Discussion] [The Team]	Congratulations, Philosopher for passing a request for adminship! Commiserations go to Comppro whose request for adminiship was closed per WP:SNOW. Bluegoblin7 stepped down from adminship. QandA The QandA. Every month, a user will be interviewed by a member of the Simple News team. This idea was started by Kennedy and interviews have since been made by Bluegoblin7, Yotcmdr and Shappy This weeks interview is with Pmlinediter. Click here for Pmlinediter's interview! The Commander's Choice The Commanders's Choice. For every edition, Yotcmdr will be chosing articles that need creating, expanding or being attended to. Here is this edition's list: Aluminum Telephone Carrot Opera France The News in Brief Main Stories: Pop star Michael Jackson died due to a cardiac arrest. A Yemenia airliner crashed in the Indian Ocean on 30 June. There was only one survivor. The Organization of American States has suspended Honduras in protest after it ousted President Manuel Zelaya. Heavy rain in China and Vietnam has forced more than 300,000 people to leave their homes. The African Union's decision not to help arrest Sudan's president will not stop the International Criminal Court. Click here to see the sport stories Click here to see the Entertainement stories

Yotcmdr ^{=talk to the commander=} 08:17, 6 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, this is partly my fault and partly BG7's. I said that I'll start a ST thread (which I did), but he asked me to be bold :/. Sorry for my edits and please participate in the ST discussion. Pmlineditor 10:43, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

No prob. Just as I said on IRC, personally, I would't make such changes without a community consensus, if I were you. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 10:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Can I have rollback rights?-- Deoxyribonucleic Acid ([+]) 10:02, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Request page is WP:RFRB. But, anyway, I deleted today one of your edits and your created edits... sorry, no. I would object to grant the tool, atm. Barras (talk) 10:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I think you should wait some time before requesting and show us that the rollback rights are of any use for you. Regards, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 10:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

After 25 reverts....-- Deoxyribonucleic Acid ([+]) 10:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, I'm not going to count the number of your reverts. Just prove us you're eligible of granting the rollback rights and then we'll decide. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 10:14, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Can you please give me an example as per. I have made nearly a good amount of fruitful main space edits (what I perceive around 75 to 100).

And have been an user for some 11 months. anyhow I have less experience of using the tool, I have used it in test wikis. So that I can only revert the rash edits some times done, efficiently...For Instance I can judge between good and bad edits. Anything more eh? -- Deoxyribonucleic Acid ([+]) 10:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Two admins said no. Wait a few days. And request the tool on the page I linked above. Barras (talk) 10:26, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

You've mostly edited in your own userspace and made only 3 reverts during these 11 months (all the reverts were made today). Just show us how you can judge between good and bad edits. This is not about your editcount. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 10:31, 13 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'm new to Simple, though I've been contributing to the regular Wikipedia for awhile. Anyway, my question to you is, what does "iw" mean? Please forgive me if it's something obvious. :) Best, t'shael ^mindmeld 12:07, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi T'Shael, "iw" means "interwiki". :) Best regards, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 12:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ah, okay. Makes sense. :) Thanks much, t'shael ^mindmeld 12:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The French knights were killed. Many historians believe it was the mud on the field. The fact we dont know! --
 :: Deoxyribonucleic Acid . 09:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thank you for your message. This was no vandalism and no one used a rollback here. The anonymous user only deleted an unverified statement that was present without any reference in the article since April. Best regards, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 09:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK I just wanted it to stay :P --
 :: Deoxyribonucleic Acid . 09:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

BTW I cant make out what this IRC means....It says as per it makes official conferences likewise in channels like #wikipedia....How do I access that and where...whin I see it has a protocol irc:// which is totally unrecognized by my system. Regards..--
 :: Deoxyribonucleic Acid . 09:57, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Well, first you should install an IRC client such as ChatZilla or Xchat... -- Mercy (☎|✍) 09:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

looking out for that, Thnks--
 :: Deoxyribonucleic Acid . 10:02, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

GoblinBot3 (talk) 12:03, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

The creator is a long term vandal who has made this page on multiple language Wikipedias and should not be allowed to edit at all. I've requested that the article be deleted from every single project it was added on. Bambifan101 should not be allowed to edit Wikipedia, whether it's English, Simple English, Russian, or Turkish.Ryulong (talk) 12:17, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I know about this user and I know it is a vandal. But why has the article to be deleted? It is not unsourced and the topic is notable. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 12:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm a new user of simple English. Please explain me about simple English.

Thanks!

Relly Komaruzaman Talk 09:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, please see the welcome message I just put in your talk page. Best regards, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 09:34, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have seen the message. Simple English is more American English or not?

Relly Komaruzaman Talk 09:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

No, it is not. Please see Wikipedia:Simple English Wikipedia. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 09:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mercy! You revertet the move by Rich Farmbrough (talk · contribs). The move of this page by Rich seems to be right. We move our main space page normally per en and enwiki uses the full name and the other as redirect. Please consider to undo your revert. Best --Barras (talk) 18:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, actually, the template was moved by the same user on the en.wiki. As I did not find any community consensus about the move, I'd suggest keeping the the name as it is. Such move also created several thousands of template redirects, which in my opinion, only slow down the server performance. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 18:25, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I didn't noticed, that this was done on enwiki by the same user. Thanks for the information. So, you revert was fully ok. Thanks Barras (talk) 18:27, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Redirects are not expensive. Redirects are cheap. See en:Wikipedia:Don't worry about performance and en:Wikipedia:Tools/Navigation popups/About fixing redirects. The servers will cache the redirect. Rich Farmbrough (talk)

Hello, thanks for the links. Is there any community consensus about the template move. I wouldn't mind the move if there were any. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 19:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I don't think there needs to be due to WP:BOLD. And clearly having the words spelled out completely falls in line with us trying to be simpler english as short forms are not simple english. -Djsasso (talk) 19:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I don't mind moving the template to the longer form but I think we should wait some time and watch if the move is not reverted on the en.wiki. If nothing happens, let's say, in a week time, I'd suggest moving the template to the longer form. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 10:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Pmlineditor 10:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've been trying to contact you recently with no response. Is this a better venue for next time? What's the problem with IRC? -- Mentifisto 12:52, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I haven't received any messages from you recently and don't know where the problem is. If I don't respond, you can try the query function or e-mail me. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 12:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I did /query you and even ping by calling out your nick... your client must've not displayed it, then. -- Mentifisto 13:16, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

That's strange. I'll restart the client. Perhaps, it'll help. Could you please try to send the message again in about 5 minutes? -- Mercy (☎|✍) 13:20, 7 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

It seems you are an anti indian.You have mentioned Kashmir as an INDIAN OCCUPIED TERRITORY in many articales. Cant you be more professional and more nutral while spreading the knowledge. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 00jayhind (talk • contribs)

Hello, thanks for your message. In my opinion, Indian Occupied Territory is a perfectly neutral term which is widely used. Could you provide me with some reference to your statements? Best regards, -- Mercy (☎|✍) 10:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I was serious?? Please don't hurt me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan Q Lamp (talk • contribs)

Please stop trolling. This is the only warning. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 12:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

I have blocked this user for the highly inappropriate comments made on the now-deleted RfA. Majorly talk 13:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

OK, I have no objections. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 13:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Je ne comprends pas ! Il m'a informé que l'article court a eu besoin de plus pour indiquer au sujet de ce qui se produisait dans le Roi Arthur' ; cour de s. J'essayerai de la convertir en anglais Mr hammond (talk) 13:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Si vous voulez contribuer en Francais, vous pouvez commencer ici. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 13:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please protect it. – Katerenka (talk • contribs) 07:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I've semi-protected your userpage for 1 month. If you need anything, feel free to drop by at any time. -- Mercy (☎|✍) 07:14, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. :) Warmly, – Katerenka (talk • contribs) 07:16, 7 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

		The Half Barnstar
		for making me a ham sandwich Franklin J. Robinson (talk) 11:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

		The Half Barnstar
		and filling it with the most delicious mustard Franklin J. Robinson (talk) 11:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

GoblinBot3 (talk) 08:50, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

...for warning the ip. I'm looking into why my warning button is no longer there. Best. Synergy 12:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem. :-) Cheers, --Mercy (talk) 12:37, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

GoblinBot3 (talk) 00:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

--Barras (de) (talk) 22:43, 24 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello Mercy, Well yes the article was copied from the En Wikipedia but I have edited it well to delete and replace complex word and sentances. Also I deleted the links, categories and section that were not here. I think that you should have checked it fully before removing it so quickly, it was in a snap, I dont even the get time to modify it further if there is any problems. But it is ok, I respect Simple Wikipedia guidelines here and will try to do work here in it accordance. Thank You. --Wikisidd (talk) 13:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I've compared the text you added with the enwiki article and came to a decision that both texts are nearly the same. I'm sorry for any inconvenience and wish you good luck editing the SEWP. --Mercy (talk) 13:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thank you for the welcome. I'm an existing user in English Wikipedia and Hebrew Wikipedia, and I'm expanding my user page to include a link to simple English Wikipedia. I hope to translate some pages from Hebrew to simple English in the future. Can you tell me of some useful links for translating to and from simple English? Thanks in advance - Squaredevil (talk) 11:28, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Edit: I just read through the welcome and found the links I need. Thanks again :) - Squaredevil (talk) 11:30, 6 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yottie ^=talk= 20:07, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

You recently changed a redirect on my Simple English talk page to a soft redirect. What's the thought behind this -- With a regular redirect, it takes real effort to edit a page; with a soft redirect, someone can easily ignore it. Is the thinking that a regular redirect might confuse?

Also, while I hesitate to slap an Admin's wrist, however gently, on en:wikipedia it would have more usual to drop me a note asking me to make the change, rather than directly making a change to the structure of my talk page. After all, the only material that we create here that is supposed to be ours is our user pages and the headers of our talk pages. While there are certainly items on User and Talk pages that might require immediate change (e.g. copyright problems or other unacceptable material), this was hardly in that class. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 18:31, 30 December 2009 (UTC) If you choose to respond, please do so here.Reply

Hi, interwiki redirects do not work as usual redirects and therefore the MediaWiki software categorises them as broken redirects. This is why they are changed to soft redirects. If you don't like having this template on your userpage, you are welcome to report the problem with interwiki redirects on MediaWiki Bugzilla. Best regards, --Mercy (talk) 19:37, 30 December 2009 (UTC)Reply