Redirect to:
To propose an article for Good article status, just add it to the top of the list using the code, filling out 'page title' and 'reason' with your proposed...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:REVIEWWP:REVIEW WP:PRWP:PR This page is a place to get comments and peer review from other Wikipedians on Wikipedia pages. For comments on policies...
Click to read more »recognised in peer-reviewed mathematical literature. Unproved conjectures, informal mathematical claims, and results published only in non-peer-reviewed sources...
Click to read more »the talk page. Jordanhatch 11:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC) Chopstick needs a peer review. Please read it!Coffsneeze 02:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC) Article was...
Click to read more »page with an accuracy argument, the best way to solve the problem is to peer review the content, and check whether it's inaccurate. Once you've checked...
Click to read more »--George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 16:56, 15 April 2016 (UTC) Peer Van Mladen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close...
Click to read more »eukaryotes Any plant species that has been given a formal scientific name in a peer-reviewed publication is considered appropriate for a Wikipedia article. The...
Click to read more »name. Any animal species that has been given a formal scientific name in a peer-reviewed publication is considered appropriate for a Wikipedia article. The...
Click to read more »catalogued in an authoritative astronomical database and have been the subject of peer-reviewed scientific publications. Quick considerations: Use the object's...
Click to read more »simplifying, but overall this article looks out of shape and needs some major peer reviewing as well as simplifying. Would really appreciate it if someone would...
Click to read more »this opportunity to thank everyone who reviews articles in PGA, PVGA and Peer Review and also the editors who review and nominate hooks at T:TDYK. (Yes...
Click to read more »mainstream medical and scientific literature. Tests described only in non-peer-reviewed sources, promotional materials, or alternative medicine publications...
Click to read more »watch · logs · delete) I the article about Hurricane Luis should have a peer review. The article is about 6 kilobytes long, however it covers many of...
Click to read more »range of documented perspectives without taking sides. Base the article on peer-reviewed research, government data, and established journalism. Avoid relying...
Click to read more »conditions, informal illness categories, and conditions described only in non-peer-reviewed or alternative medicine sources are not suitable for Wikipedia articles...
Click to read more »factual data such as elevation, length, or area. Base scientific content on peer-reviewed geology, geography, or earth sciences publications. Do not write...
Click to read more »(UTC) The criteria for good articles The criteria for very good articles Peer Review for general review of articles; unrelated to good or very good articles...
Click to read more »about the religion. Base all claims about history, doctrine, and practice on peer-reviewed academic sources, not on religious texts used as the sole source...
Click to read more »noteworthy viewpoints include protoscience as published through reputable peer-reviewed journals. Users may reasonably present active public disputes or...
Click to read more »To propose an article for Very Good article status, just add it to the top of the list using the code, filling out 'page title' and 'reason' with your...
Click to read more »in original research; see below. In general the most reliable sources are peer-reviewed journals and books published in university presses; university-level...
Click to read more »I've done some article work here as well, with Bloemfontein currently at peer review. I'm reasonably experienced here, and I'm also quite trusted on other...
Click to read more »well: IUPAC publications and official element confirmations (iupac.org) Peer-reviewed chemistry journals (e.g. Journal of the American Chemical Society...
Click to read more »subject is clearly notable as an academic and has a substantial record of peer-reviewed publications and international research activity such as [1], [2]...
Click to read more »to making GA or VGA a month or two ago. Probably could make it again if peer reviewed. In my opinion, is simple enough and covers all the relevant topics...
Click to read more »Previous requests: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7...
Click to read more »a group of students. Each group will work on at least one page and will peer review another group's changes. Create your user page (you need not add your...
Click to read more »to add that the citation given is published by Diario 16 which is not a peer-reviewed mathematical journal. -- *Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 13:09, 31 March...
Click to read more »and author of "The Past Web: Exploring Web Archives" (Springer, 2021), a peer-reviewed academic volume published by a major international publisher. His...
Click to read more »agencies National statistics offices for population and administrative data Peer-reviewed geography and earth sciences journals Established reference works...
Click to read more »regulatory filings and government records (e.g. Companies House, SEC filings), Peer-reviewed business or industry academic publications Established industry...
Click to read more »Sport, L'Équipe), Official league, federation or governing body records, Peer-reviewed sports science or biographical publications Major newswires covering...
Click to read more »explanation. It isn't wide-used and the only 'research" publications are in non-peer-reviewed publications that use online ads to generate revenue. No major publications...
Click to read more »clinical institutions are generally considered notable. Also, subject’s peer reviewed publications and independent media coverage supports keeping this...
Click to read more »"keep" or "delete", such as merging. Keep This is a notable academic with peer-reviewed publications, film documentaries, and much more. I really don't...
Click to read more »lists for reasons explain there. They still have duties and are still 'peers' but may be excluded from some votes in the House of Lords. Still have full...
Click to read more »If it is the same thing, we probably need to put it somewhere besides "peer review" (on its own page) and we should maybe see if we can find a better...
Click to read more »I've started making a new article for this, but it's not done with. Before I finish it are there any suggestions as to what I should further do. Thanks...
Click to read more »Both are very important stars in the C-pop music industry. Might not be simple enough for Simple English. Please review. I created this article and I would...
Click to read more »PR is dead, but I'm hoping I can get a brief overview of what the article needs before proposing it at VGA. Also, I want to template the lead from this...
Click to read more »articles. Truthfully, I only wrote Julian calendar, Gregorian calendar and peer review after noticing a need for them. My main use for Administrator rights...
Click to read more »reliable. --Infogapp1 (talk) 19:26, 3 September 2020 (UTC) It is with the name peer ajmal Raza in msn 2401:4900:1B17:EB1:F311:413F:7F6C:6368 (talk) 20:50, 3...
Click to read more »for administrative facts Established reference works and encyclopaedias Peer-reviewed urban geography, history, and economics publications Major international...
Click to read more »Project:Peer review. -- Netoholic @ 00:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC) I'd like to point out that I have worked on an article in a major way, and that Peer review...
Click to read more »Normandy (talk) 11:12, 16 September 2011 (UTC) Would it make sense to limit peer review nominations, DYK nominations, GA nominations, and VGA nominations...
Click to read more »international news agencies and major newspapers for current events Academic peer-reviewed publications for history, geography, and culture un.org worldbank...
Click to read more »studies publications Established music reference works and encyclopaedias Peer-reviewed journals in ethnomusicology and music history allmusic.com pitchfork...
Click to read more »professionals: The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. The person is known for starting a significant new concept...
Click to read more »*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 15:13, 13 May 2022 (UTC) We do have a few who are peers of both parts of Ireland (they have to choose which parliament they will...
Click to read more »every big category, say Geography, People, Biology and so on. Wikipedia:Peer review exists, and could be used to nominate articles. It would make it a...
Click to read more »Wired, TechCrunch, The Verge) Major newspapers with technology sections Peer-reviewed computer science and software engineering publications Academic...
Click to read more »publications with editorial standards Major newspaper arts and culture sections Peer-reviewed museum studies, art history, and heritage publications Official...
Click to read more »biographical dictionaries Official government or parliamentary records Academic or peer-reviewed publications Major newswires and outlets with editorial standards...
Click to read more »newswires and newspapers with arts coverage (e.g. The Guardian, AP, Reuters) Peer-reviewed film studies or theatre publications Official award body records...
Click to read more »article is identified as a potential candidate. It should be listed on the peer review page to allow other editors to make improvements. When the article...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) "Nor would there be any peer reviews. After all, if the article ain't broke, don't fix it." - nonsense. Peer review is all about people asking...
Click to read more »considered non-reliable, since it is a PhD thesis and not a paper submitted to a peer-reviewed journal. The Rawandiz Revolt might be notable, but the individual...
Click to read more »19:27, 27 October 2011 (UTC) For the same reason I thought we should merge Peer Review...we don't have the number of editors necessary for all these side...
Click to read more »propose we delete this; first of all, it can be found at this site of a peer-reviewed open-access journal (would need attributiion); secondly, thinking...
Click to read more »created encyclopedia. The only content here should be opinions that are peer reviewed or otherwise subject to outside scrutiny. This is why we require...
Click to read more »Griff (talk) 10:40, 17 February 2022 (UTC) Weak Keep - Notable within his peers. Made it to Who's Who - World Association for Sustainable Development --Tarawneh...
Click to read more »Official award body records (e.g. Grammy Awards, Mercury Prize, BRIT Awards) Peer-reviewed musicology publications rollingstone.com pitchfork.com nme.com billboard...
Click to read more »Historic England, national monuments records, UNESCO World Heritage listings) Peer-reviewed architecture, urban history, and cultural heritage publications...
Click to read more »Literary Supplement, New York Review of Books) Academic literary criticism from peer-reviewed journals and university press publications Major newspaper book...
Click to read more »Literary Supplement, New York Review of Books) Academic literary criticism from peer-reviewed journals and university press publications Major newspaper book...
Click to read more »peer-reviewed publications, credible books, reputable media sources, and other reliable sources. The sources referenced as mentioned above are peer reviewed...
Click to read more »there are seven articles (four of mines, sowwrry) that are in need of a peer review from experience editors. The oldest one has been sitting there since...
Click to read more »anymore because I'm logged in. Ok thanks. I think all groups have finished the peer editing process and are now adding links to references as I have instructed...
Click to read more »comparison. Thanks. --Kyoko 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC) There's Wikipedia:Peer review to get a review of your article. Apparently there is a category for...
Click to read more »the 1st WTA than the 200th WTA, for example). He can be recognized by his peers in this field. However, it seems to me that it is "down the rank", that's...
Click to read more »Polygon, Rock Paper Shotgun) Major newspaper technology and culture sections Peer-reviewed game studies and digital culture academic publications Official...
Click to read more »of your Modified Version by various parties--for example, statements of peer review or that the text has been approved by an organization as the authoritative...
Click to read more »from you on the Billy Graham article after all?) and may toss in some help. Peer review was originally used for things like this, but it tends to get neglected...
Click to read more »ndaries-of-possibility In addition, he is listed as co-author on several peer-reviewed biomedical studies indexed on PubMed, suggesting verifiable academic...
Click to read more »promotions/movements etc. This was achieved through a hard slog and a line-by-line peer review that can be seen here. I'll try and find the exact revision that relates...
Click to read more »to become a (very) good article. Work is done to it, it may be listed at Peer Review, if needed... When it meets half of the criteria (this means: pick...
Click to read more »right thing. This also involves standing up for users rights, even against a peer. Archer7 therefore has my support. -- Eptalon 10:15, 27 May 2006 (UTC)Neutral:Vote...
Click to read more »Hello all, Wikipedia:Peer Review is a good thing to have. Since we are a small community, I propose to limit the "dist-collection" period to two months...
Click to read more »see. Thanks. Kennedy (talk) 10:41, 11 September 2008 (UTC) Remember now, peer review is just as important than GA and VGA, if not more! - A Link to the...
Click to read more »conflict reporting and fact-checking (e.g. BBC, The Guardian, New York Times) Peer-reviewed academic journals in military history, political science, and conflict...
Click to read more »'international' has to be a subject of contention as he seems to be notable among his peers & certainly would qualify for inclusion. See sources on character involvement...
Click to read more »Thanks. -- RyanCross (talk) 09:06, 14 June 2008 (UTC) Hello, I have changed Peer Review to have sections for the month the request started (sometimes whern...
Click to read more »The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. -Nope The person is known for originating a significant new...
Click to read more »ready opportunity for student to research, compile and publish articles for peer review. For young people who contribute images, the selection and production...
Click to read more »Conservative Party MPs (UK) Conservative Party MEPs (UK) Conservative Party Peers And to make similar categories for the other political parties. - JulesN...
Click to read more »suggest an article should be posted at Peer Review first, before being posted at PGA - but of course, as I said Peer review is PGA here, and so it ends up...
Click to read more »Panda Bear, I think it is better for you to become an expert editor and a peer reviewer here, than an administrator. This is my personal point of view though...
Click to read more »it is to get some kind of "peer review". Like with all texts, at some point in time "text blindness" settles in, so this peer review is necessary. As to...
Click to read more »work well, I have archived all current requests (before December 08), in Peer review; I have also added the page to auto archiving, with a deadline of...
Click to read more »know it's confusing as on basically every other website blocking is peer-to-peer, but on wikipedia only admins can block users. You can request they be...
Click to read more »even close to meeting the cut. Perhaps exacerbating the problem is that peer review redirects to PGA. If we need a place where editors can go to request...
Click to read more »goes back to 2017. The subject doesn't appear to be widely cited by their peers, doesn't appear to have innovated a method, no verified significant work...
Click to read more »the U.S. National Library of Medicine. These journals require independent peer-reviews by experts in the field. Several of the journals (Medscape General...
Click to read more »en-wikipedia and have created Golda Meir and want to know where I can get a peer review from? If you do that sort of thing? Thanks! :-) PS: I like it here...
Click to read more »the criteria, they can demote the article after reviewing it at Wikipedia:Peer review, but still give it a chance to be re-promoted (just as they do in...
Click to read more »November 2018 (UTC) I would disagree with you on that. His work has appeared in peer-reviewed journals, he has been invited (and worked as) a guest speaker at...
Click to read more »Tsūtenkaku but needs more. Ted (talk) 01:07, 14 November 2010 (UTC) Would peer review be good to see whether this should be demoted from VGA? --Chemicalinterest...
Click to read more »issues. For best results, however, your are recommended to get an informal peer review on someone's talk page prior to nomination for a speedy throughput...
Click to read more »English (and basically worldwide) wikis which, instead, correctly kept them as peer-review publications. I feel that these other points matter in wanting to...
Click to read more »every other week or something?), people should have a look at Wikipedia:Peer review (also since nobody's really there anyways). How can I see a list of...
Click to read more »proposed change affect will several hundred articles, I would like some peer review, and to give advance warning if and when the change is implemented...
Click to read more »18:37, 23 February 2011 (UTC) I'm not sure whether to put this here or in Peer Review, but would appreciate some feedback on Template:Constellations/modern/modern-list...
Click to read more »(in short, very few) people work on improving the articles listed. Yet the Peer review which was created for that purpose is virtually dead. For this reason...
Click to read more »differentiate it sufficiently; this is not a request for dust collection (peer review) thing. We should rotate this at least every two weeks. --Eptalon...
Click to read more »February 2006 (UTC) Created Category:Very good articles and Template:vgood. Peer reviewers can add the template to the top of a page to show off articles...
Click to read more »attend to the PVGA and possibly promote it. If anyone would like to help me "peer review" the GA, leave me a note on my talk page. Eurodyne (talk) 05:21, 2...
Click to read more »major problem with DYK being maintained on a user page with almost zero peer review in the process. Page history on Template talk:Did you know and User:TDKR...
Click to read more »Could someone help me simplify Tropical Storm Arthur (2020) or provide a peer review? I would like to get it to Very Good Article. Thank you so much! CodingCyclone...
Click to read more »Community Portal • Simple talk • TASERING Announcements • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Peer review • Cleanup Other Useful templates • Stubs...
Click to read more »regular editors, spend time on making this Wikipedia better, by creating more peer-reviewed Good or Very Good articles, improving existing articles, or creating...
Click to read more »found by Ionas, the children of Pakistani often perform worse than their peers (as an example: Indians seem to perform better). As far as I can see 92...
Click to read more »this replacement, our decision needs to stand up against the scrutiny of peers. In short, this wiki is (in my opinion) at the moment not in a position...
Click to read more »The only reference in that article is a Diario 16 article, which is not a peer-reviewed mathematics journal. Popular culture section also does not give...
Click to read more »the rfd tag keep getting removed, can the page be protected? Tsugaru Let's Talk! :) 🍁 02:43, 9 September 2021 (UTC) @つがる If the page is at risk of deletion...
Click to read more »soul. Let scientists decide scientists, correct each other’s profiles and peer-review each other’s papers. It helps scientists to bind and grow from each...
Click to read more »I wouldn't have nominated it when you did and would have gone through a peer review first. -DJSasso (talk) 22:16, 7 November 2010 (UTC) Well that is how...
Click to read more »despite the publication above (which by the way, does not appear to be a peer-reviewed scholarly publication, and would not be eligible for NPROF criterion...
Click to read more »point out, he's young, and if he did an academic career, he won't have many peer-reviewd publications yet.So the only other option I see to showhis notability...
Click to read more »among research scientists had grown to 100%, based on a review of 11,602 peer-reviewed articles published in the first 7 months of 2019.[5] — Preceding...
Click to read more »Version. These can be from different people. They might be a statement of peer review. They might say that a company approves of it. You may add five words...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:How to copy-edit 1 Wikipedia:Image use policy good faith 1 Wikipedia:Peer review 8 Wikipedia:Recentchanges 1 Wikipedia:Requested articles 8 Page Edits...
Click to read more »Resolved. User unblocked. EhJJTALK 01:20, 29 May 2011 (UTC) Hello, the current rule "You may vote [...] not be blocked on more than one project" excludes...
Click to read more »person. No relevant academic awards. Or demonstration of recognition of peers. If that professor has academic notoriety, the interested party must prove...
Click to read more »I think many readers are interested in seeing who a particular person's peers are. Age and nationality would be two criteria identifying that. Jim Michael...
Click to read more »academic work. The guideline also states that "citations need to occur in peer-reviewed scholarly publications". It is not quite clear what "followed by"...
Click to read more »apply here: is "regarded as an important figure or is widely cited" by peers/successors "known for originating a significant new concept, theory, or...
Click to read more »AUTHOR ("person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors") - again, the issue of (seemingly not) being widely cited...
Click to read more »of information because it’s a website on the internet instead of being a peer-reviewed published encyclopedia by an award-winning author or what have you...
Click to read more »Okay!) 04:13, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Comment: - What the article needs is a peer review and a major re-write before having second chances to meet VGA guidelines...
Click to read more »positive reviews from other editors as well as having the article undergo a few peer reviewing(s) so I was wondering if we could vote now on the article since...
Click to read more »It went through a peer review. Thanks, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 17:55, 28 September 2011 (UTC) Support - Being the issuer of the peer review that promoted...
Click to read more »I have not vandilised or anything else and that it was bad influence and peer pressure that made me act in a certain way. And, I would like to remind you...
Click to read more »nearly every active admin, and I look forward to continuing to learn from my peers. I have identified to the WMF and work as an OTRS Agent and with EnWiki...
Click to read more »advance apparently, sufficiently significant that it was published in a peer-reviewed math journal, with the reference provided. “How to trick casinos”...
Click to read more »meets 5 or more of the GA criteria. It definitely needs simplifying and a peer review. I'm not sure why but there is a red category at the bottom of the...
Click to read more »deletion/Requests/2016/Otterbourne brass Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/Peer Van Mladen Requests for deletion/Requests/2016/Photon torpedoes Requests...
Click to read more »here. The idea is that a notable author will be cited by at least several peers, so if that isn't the case for an author then they are not notable. There...
Click to read more »Eastern/Iranian point of view pp 110-13. Praise by or cooperation with peers İrem Derici: aksam, gazetevatan, milliyet (+), cnnturk İlyas Yalçıntaş:...
Click to read more »Angela deleted "Talk:Peer Review" (content was: '#REDIRECT [[Wikipedia_talk:Peer_review]]') 09:01, 18 Dec 2003 Angela deleted "Peer Review" (inappropriate...
Click to read more »annual ceremonies for recognised clans. Historical legitimacy is supported by peer-reviewed works (e.g. Gibson, Cotter) and genealogical authority Burke’s Peerage...
Click to read more »seems overwhelming for one person to do alone. I pasted this article on the Peer review page, although no one bothered to review it. --§ Snake311 (T + C)...
Click to read more »this article lacks that in many areas. This article really needs a full peer review before it will be ready for nomination. -- Creol(talk) 08:43, 15 January...
Click to read more »and if any further action should be taken it should probably undergo a Peer Review rather than a demotion proposal, as there are no issues relating to...
Click to read more »reviewed... The Rambling Man (talk) 15:16, 13 February 2010 (UTC) This isn't peer review, I'd recommend removing this nomination and working on the remainder...
Click to read more »never have gotten to a vote as it failed to meet criteria. Voting is not peer review. This is the source of one of the major issues TRM keeps going on...
Click to read more »in a research paper which was subsequently published in three additional peer-reviewed articles. There was also no mention of Depression (differential...
Click to read more »influence in cultural and institutional life and confirm his standing among his peers. Sources for Verification: To verify this information, you can refer to:...
Click to read more »about and various other changes made, including a copy-edit and line-by-line peer review. More comments welcome please :) Goblin 22:25, 23 March 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »The article is okay, but certainly not ready for GA. It needs a thorough peer review. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:44, 27 March 2011 (UTC) Bobby Fischer...
Click to read more »recomendation not to re-list for at least a month or so and to go through a Peer Review first. But of course, this is not compulsory. Regards, Goblin 19:48...
Click to read more »delete) Used to be a GA but no longer met the standards of the others. Since Peer review seems pretty inactive, I thought I'd bring it here. A few red links...
Click to read more »it reasonably fits all nine requirements. All problems mentioned in its peer review have been fixed. PrincessofLlyr talk 17:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC) Sorry...
Click to read more »where these sort of things get pointed out and fixed on this wiki, not at peer review like on en. And why we council people to not vote if they can avoid...
Click to read more »it has been here now for coming up to a year. Perhaps get some users to peer review out any existing issues, and then return when it's in tip top shape...
Click to read more »· Monarchy of the United Kingdom · Privilege of peerage · Representative peer · Royal Maundy Áedán mac Gabráin · Ælle of Sussex · Æthelbald of Mercia ·...
Click to read more »part of the Content Review process: Wikipedia:Featured articles, Wikipedia:Peer review, Wikipedia:Good articles. This award was designed by Ling.Nut on October...
Click to read more »just about anyone can publish papers, notes, data - anything there without peer review. It's a good place to link to a paper, but this is about something...
Click to read more »1848 rare 1849 valley 1850 emotion 1851 diet 1852 chest 1853 surgery 1854 peer 1855 lip 1856 rank 1857 encounter 1858 whenever 1859 inspire 1860 senate...
Click to read more »feel free to do so or reach out to the user directly and advise they get a peer review at Simple Talk. None of the previous actions require action from an...
Click to read more »would have to stop and re-assess the work through review. I mean, this is a peer-review which is a good and valued situation, which we could all benefit from...
Click to read more »is just a number. If you show a Simple English Wikipedia article to your peers, your friends, or your children, what do you want them to see? -Try it yourself:...
Click to read more »gong-redefines-the-boundaries-of-possibility/ Scientific Publications in Peer-Reviewed Journals – Saningong is a co-author on multiple studies indexed...
Click to read more »@Eptalon, Rathfelder, and Kojak Savalas: what does the template in question ({{ping}}) do??? 88.110.38.249 (talk) 19:10, 27 August 2023 (UTC) When you're...
Click to read more »