Orixinalmente, o pobo támil gobernaba en Tamilakam e partes de Sri Lanka. Durante o período colonial, as áreas támil pasaron a estar baixo dominio da India Británica e Ceilán británico. Isto supuxo o fin da soberanía dos támiles e reduciunos a un status de minoría baixo o novo modelo político. Dende a independencia da India e Sri Lanka, os movementos de separatismo támil foron activamente suprimidos en ámbolos dous países.[2]
Unha famosa cita do poeta támil Kannadasan sobre o pobo támil e a nación sen estado: "Non hai estado sen támiles, non hai estado para os támiles."[3]
Notas
↑Religious Nationalism: A Reference Handbook: A Reference Handbook, Atalia Omer, Jason A. Springs (2013)
↑India, Sri Lanka and the Tamil crisis, 1976-1994: an international perspective (1995), Alan J. Bullion, p.32.
↑Historical Dictionary of the Tamils (2007), p. 319.
Abraham, Shinu (2003). Chera, Chola, Pandya: Using archaeological evidence to identify the Tamil kingdoms of early historic South India. Asian Perspectives42. pp. 207–223. doi:10.1353/asi.2003.0031. hdl:10125/17189.
Clooney, Francis X. (1992). Extending the Canon: Some Implications of a Hindu Argument about Scripture. The Harvard Theological Review85. pp. 197–215.
Cutler, Norman; Peterson, Indira Viswanathan; Piḷḷāṉ; Carman, John; Narayanan, Vasudha; Pillan (1991). Tamil Bhakti in Translation. Journal of the American Oriental Society111 (Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 111, No. 4). pp. 768–775. JSTOR603406. doi:10.2307/603406.
Kailasapathy, K. (1979). The Tamil Purist Movement: A re-evaluation. Social Scientist7 (Social Scientist, Vol. 7, No. 10). pp. 23–51. JSTOR3516775. doi:10.2307/3516775.
Kohli, A. (2004). "Federalism and the Accommodation of Ethnic Nationalism". En Amoretti, Ugo M.; Bermeo, Nancy. Federalism and Territorial Cleavages. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 281–299. ISBN0-8018-7408-4. Consultado o 2008-04-25.
Moorti, S. (2004). Fashioning a Cosmopolitan Tamil Identity: Game Shows, Commodities and Cultural Identity. Media, Culture & Society26. pp. 549–567. doi:10.1177/0163443704044217.
Palanithurai, G. (1989). Changing Contours of Ethnic Movement: A Case Study of the Dravidian Movement. Annamalai University Dept. of Political Science Monograph series, No. 2. Annamalainagar: Annamalai University.
Pandian, M.S.S. (1994). Notes on the transformation of 'Dravidian' ideology: Tamilnadu, c. 1900-1940. Social Scientist22 (Social Scientist, Vol. 22, No. 5/6). pp. 84–104. JSTOR3517904. doi:10.2307/3517904.
Parthasarathy, R. (1993). The Cilappatikaram of Ilanko Atikal: An Epic of South India. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN0-231-07848-X.
Peterson, Indira V. (1982). Singing of a Place: Pilgrimage as Metaphor and Motif in the Tēvāram Songs of the Tamil Śaivite Saints. Journal of the American Oriental Society102 (Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 102, No. 1). pp. 69–90. JSTOR601112. doi:10.2307/601112..
Steever, Sanford (1987). Review of Hellmar-Rajanayagam, Tamil als politisches Symbol. Journal of the American Oriental Society107. pp. 355–356. doi:10.2307/602864.
Subrahmanian, N. (1981). An introduction to Tamil literature. Madras: Christian Literature Society.
Nota: As formas de nacionalismo baseado principalmente no grupo étnico están recollidos enriba. Isto non implica que tódolos nacionalistas do grupo étnico subscriban esa forma de nacionalismo étnico.
Strategi Solo vs Squad di Free Fire: Cara Menang Mudah!