《阿爾及爾之戰》 The Battle of Algiers,導演 Gillo Pontecorvo,獲1966年威尼斯金獅獎。
参考文献
^ 1.01.1Windrow, Martin; Chappell, Mike. The Algerian War 1954–62. Osprey Publishing. 1997: 11. ISBN 9781855326583.
^Introduction to Comparative Politics, by Mark Kesselman, Joel Krieger, William Joseph, page 108
^Alexander Cooley, Hendrik Spruyt. Contracting States: Sovereign Transfers in International Relations. Page 63.
^George Bernard Noble. Christian A. Herter: The American Secretaries of State and Their Diplomacy. Page 155.
^Robert J. C. Young. Postcolonialism: An Historical Introduction. Wiley. 12 October 2016: 300. ISBN 978-1-118-89685-3. the French lost their Algerian empire in military and political defeat by the FLN, just as they lost their empire in China in defeat by Giap and Ho Chi Minh.
^R. Aldrich. Vestiges of Colonial Empire in France. Palgrave Macmillan UK. 10 December 2004: 156. ISBN 978-0-230-00552-5. For the [French] nation as a whole, commemoration of the Franco-Algerian War is complicated since it ended in defeat (politically, if not strictly militarily) rather than victory.
^Paul Allatson; Jo McCormack. Exile Cultures, Misplaced Identities. Rodopi. 2008: 117. ISBN 978-90-420-2406-9. The Algerian War came to an end in 1962, and with it closed some 130 years of French colonial presence in Algeria (and North Africa). With this outcome, the French Empire, celebrated in pomp in Paris in the Exposition coloniale of 1931 ... received its decisive death blow.
^France's Colonial Legacies: Memory, Identity and Narrative. University of Wales Press. 15 October 2013: 111. ISBN 978-1-78316-585-8. The difficult relationship which France has with the period of history dominated by the Algerian war has been well documented. The reluctance, which ended only in 1999, to acknowledge 'les évenements' as a war, the shame over the fate of the harki detachments, the amnesty covering many of the deeds committed during the war and the humiliation of a colonial defeat which marked the end of the French empire are just some of the reasons why France has preferred to look towards a Eurocentric future, rather than confront the painful aspects of its colonial past.
He also argues that the least controversial of all the numbers put forward by various groups are those concerning the French soldiers, where government numbers are largely accepted as sound. Most controversial are the numbers of civilians killed. On this subject, he turns to the work of Meynier, who, citing French army documents (not the official number) posits the range of 55,000–60,000 deaths. Meynier further argues that the best number to capture the harkis deaths is 30,000. If we add to this, the number of European civilians, which government figures posit as 2,788.