Mixed-member systems also often combine local representation[6] (most often single-member constituencies) with regional or national (multi-member constituencies) representation, having multiple tiers.[7] This also means voters often elect different types of representatives who might have different types of constituencies. Some representatives may be elected by personal elections where voters vote for candidates, and some by list elections where voters vote for electoral lists of parties.
In most mixed systems, every voter can influence both the district-based and PR aspects of an election, such as under parallel voting; however, some countries have multiple coexisting electoral systems that each apply to different voters.[5][8]
Types of mixed systems
Compensatory/non-compensatory seat allocation
A major distinction is often made between mixed compensatory systems and mixed non-compensatory systems.[9] In both types of systems, one set of seats is allocated using a plurality or majoritarian method, usually first past the post. The remaining seats are allocated to political parties partially or wholly based on a proportional allocation method such as highest averages or largest remainder. The difference is whether or not the results of the district elections are considered when allocating the PR seats.
In mixed non-compensatory systems, such as parallel voting,[10] the proportional allocation is performed independently of the district election component.
In mixed compensatory systems, the allocation of the top-up seats is done in such a way as to compensate as much as possible for dis-proportionality produced by the district elections. MMP generally produces proportional election outcomes, meaning that a political party that wins n percent of the vote will receive roughly n percent of the seats.
The following hypothetical example based on the one by Massicotte[10] illustrates how "top-up" PR seats are typically allocated in a compensatory system and in a non-compensatory system. The example assumes a 200-seat legislative assembly where 100 seats are filled using FPTP and the other 100 seats are awarded to parties using a form of PR. The table below gives the popular vote and FPTP results. The number of PR seats allocated to each party depends on whether the system is compensatory or non-compensatory.
Party
Popular vote
FPTP seats
PR seats
Total seats (FPTP + PR)
FPTP seats
Party A
44%
64
?
?
Party B
40%
33
?
?
Party C
10%
0
?
?
Party D
6%
3
?
?
TOTAL
100%
100
100
200
In non compensatory system, each party wins its proportional share of the 100 PR seats. Under such a system, the total number of seats (FPTP + PR) received by each party would not be proportional to its share of the popular vote. Party A receives just slightly less of the popular vote than Party B, but receives significantly more seats. In addition to its success in the district contests, Party A receives almost as many of the PR seats as Party B.
Party
Popular vote
FPTP seats
PR seats (non-compensatory)
Total seats (FPTP + PR)
PR seats (non-compensatory)
Total seats (FPTP + PR)
Party A
44%
64
44
108 (54% of assembly)
Party B
40%
33
40
73 (36.5% of assembly)
Party C
10%
0
10
10 (5% of assembly)
Party D
6%
3
6
9 (4.5% of assembly)
TOTAL
100%
100
100
200
If the PR seats are allocated in a compensatory system, the total number of seats awarded to each party is proportional to the party's share of the popular vote. Party B wins 33 of the district seats and its proportional share of the 200 seats being filled is 80 seats (40 percent of the total 200 seats) (the same as its share of the popular vote) so it is awarded 47 of the PR seats.
Party
Popular vote
FPTP seats
PR seats (compensatory)
Total seats (FPTP + PR)
PR seats (compensatory)
Total seats (FPTP + PR)
Party A
44%
64
24
88 (44% of assembly)
Party B
40%
33
47
80 (40% of assembly)
Party C
10%
0
20
20 (10% of assembly)
Party D
6%
3
9
12 (6% of assembly)
TOTAL
100%
100
100
200
In practice, compensatory seat allocation is complicated by the possibility that one or more parties wins so many of the district seats ("overhang") that the available number of PR seats is insufficient to produce a fully proportional outcome.[11] Some mixed compensatory systems have rules that address these situations by adding additional PR seats to achieve overall PR. These seats are used only until the next election, unless needed again at that time.[10]
The two common ways compensation occurs are seat linkage compensation (or top-up) and vote linkage compensation (or vote transfer).[11] Like a non-compensatory mixed system, a compensatory mixed system may be based on the mixed single vote (voters vote for a local candidate and that vote is used to set the party share of the popular vote for the party that the candidate belongs to) or it may be based on voters casting two separate votes.[12]
Comparison of most common types of two-tier mixed systems by number of votes and compensation
A diagram of a coexistence based mixed electoral system combining first-past-the-post and party-list proportional representation.
Apart from the compensatory/non-compensatory typology, a more detailed classification is possible based on how component systems relate to each other, according to academic literature. Below is a table of different categories of mixed electoral systems based on the five main types identified by Massicotte & Blais.[13] According to their terminology, methods of compensation are referred to as compensation is referred to as correction, while another type of dependent combination exists, called the conditional relation between sub-systems. Meanwhile, independent combinations mixed systems might have both local and national/regional tiers (called superposition), but some have only one at-large (national) tier, like the majority bonus system (fusion) or only a single tier for local/regional representation (called coexistence).
There are also supermixed systems, like rural-urban proportional (RUP), which is a hybrid mixed system that uses two tiers: the lower tier uses a proportional system, like list-PR or STV, in urban regions, and the upper tier uses MMP (itself a mixed system) either in rural regions alone or in all regions.[10]
In a hybrid system, different electoral formulas are used in different contexts. These may be seen in coexistence, when different methods are used in different regions of a country, such as when FPTP is used in single-member districts and list-PR in multi-member districts, but every voter is a member of only one district (one tier). Some hybrid systems are generally not referred to as mixed systems, such as when as FPTP districts are the exception (e.g. overseas constituency) and list-PR is the rule, the overall system is usually considered proportional. Similarly, when FPTP is in single-member districts and used block voting (or party block voting) is used in multi-member districts, the system is referred to as a majoritarian one, as all components are majoritarian. Most mixed systems are not referred to as hybrid systems
Mixed-member majoritarian and mixed-member proportional
Parallel voting is a mixed non-compensatory system with two tiers of representatives: a tier of single-member district representatives elected by a plurality/majoritarian method such as FPTP/SMP, and a tier of regional or at-large representatives elected by a separate proportional method such as party list PR. It is used for the first chamber (lower house) in many countries including Japan and Russia.
This type of parallel voting provides semi-proportional results, but is often referred to as mixed-member majoritarian representation, as the lack of compensation means each party can keep all the overhang seats it might win on the majoritarian side of the electoral system.
Like parallel voting, MMP and AMS also have a tier of district representatives typically elected by FPTP, and a tier of regional or at-large representatives elected by PR. Unlike parallel voting, MMP and AMS are mixed compensatory systems, meaning that the PR seats are allocated in a manner that corrects disproportionality caused by the district tier. MMP corrects disproportionalities by adding as many leveling seats as needed, this system is used by Germany and New Zealand.
A type of MMP used in the UK which does not always yield proportional results, but sometimes only "mixed semi-proportional representation" is called the additional member system. If the fixed number of compensatory seats are enough to compensate the results of the majoritarian FPTP/SMP side of the election, AMS is equivalent to MMP, but if not, AMS does not compensate for remaining overhang seats. The AMS models used in parts of the UK (Scotland and formerly Wales), with small regions with a fixed number of seats tend to produce only moderately proportional election outcomes.
In Lesotho, where a single vote versions seat linkage us used with a relatively large number of compensatory seats, results are usually proportional.
Vote linkage compensatory systems are an alternative to seat linkage compensation, currently only used in Hungary as part of a supermixed system. Such systems in use have been (inaccurately[14]) described as mixed member proportional, but they were more commonly between MMP and MMM in nature, or closer to mixed-member majoritarian representation, offering little compensatory power.
MBTV is a mixed compensatory type of systems similar to MSV, except voters can vote separately for a local candidate and as a transfer vote on the compensatory tier.[15] It is different from MMP/AMS and AV+ in that there is a vote linkage (instead of seat linkage) between the tiers. The two parts of the dual ballot are tied in a way that only those lists votes get counted, which are on ballots that would be transfer votes in an equivalent positive vote transfer MSV system.
Scorporo is a two-tier mixed system similar to MMP in that voters have two votes (one for a local candidate on the lower tier, and one for a party list on the upper tier), except that disproportionality caused by the single-member district tier is partially addressed through a vote transfer mechanism.[16] Votes that are crucial to the election of district-winning candidates are excluded from the PR seat allocation, for this reason the method used by scorporo is referred to as a negative vote transfer system.[17] The system was used in Italy from 1993 to 2005
A simple bonus system (left) is also called a fusion type of mixed system. It mixes the FPTP and PR formulas in the same district and tier. A majority jackpot (right) is a supermixed system with a conditional and compensatory element as well.
Electoral systems with a majority bonus or jackpot have been referred to as "unconventional mixed systems",[18] which fall into the mixed-member majoritarian type, but they may be compensatory (jackpot) or non-compensatory (bonus). Employed by Armenia, Greece, and San Marino, as well as Italy from 2006 to 2013,[19] majority bonuses help the most popular party or alliance win a majority of the seats with a minority of the votes, similar in principle to plurality/majoritarian systems. However, PR is used to distribute the rest of seats (sometimes only among the opposition parties) and possibly within the governing alliance.
Number of votes
Double vote
Most mixed systems allow voters to cast separate votes for different formulas of the electoral system, including:
MSV is a type of mixed systems using only a single vote that serves both as a vote for a local candidate and as a party list vote, split ticket voting is not possible. The system was used in Germany in a mixed proportional system,[12] and is currently used in Hungary as a semi-proportional system as well as Italy in a non-compensatory system. Other mixed systems using a single vote include majority bonus/jackpot systems and DMP.
Other systems that are usually considered mixed, which use a single vote are:
Majority bonus and jackpot (a single party-list vote)
DMP (a vote for a single candidate or a two-candidate ticket)
The RUP systems formerly used in Denmark and Iceland used a single vote, applicable both for the lower-tier constituencies - FPTP in the rural single-member constituencies, and list PR in the urban multi-member constituencies - and for the upper-tier national leveling seats (and in Denmark, also for the middle-tier regional leveling seats in rural areas). The implementation of RUP proposed in Canada foresees urban multi-member districts that use a single transferable vote, alongside single-member rural districts that are grouped in large multi-member regions; the rural districts and their corresponding regions.
A simultaneous vote is a single vote that used in more than one elections held at once, which means it is not a typically regarded as a mixed system.[citation needed]
List of countries using mixed systems
The table below lists the countries that use a mixed electoral system for the primary (lower) chamber of the legislature. Countries with coexistence-based hybrid systems have been excluded from the table, as have countries that mix two plurality/majoritarian systems. (See also the complete list of electoral systems by country.)
The parish lists and the national list are independent of one another: the same person cannot appear on both the national list and on a parish list, and voters cast two separate ballots (there is no requirement to vote for the same party for both lists).[20]
80% of seats (rounded to the nearest integer) in each constituency are awarded to the party receiving the most votes (party block voting), remaining seats are allocated proportionally to other parties receiving over 10% (closed list, D'Hondt method)
Referred to as personalized proportional representation,[22] in 1949 as a result of inter-party bargaining.[23] Originally used single vote version, switched to two vote version before the 1953 election.
Since 1996, a party cannot get more seats overall than 8% above its result nationally (i.e., to win 50% of the legislative seats, a party must win at least 42% of the vote nationwide). There are three exceptions on this rule: first, a party can only lose PR-seats due to this rule (and no plurality-seats); second, a party can never get more than 300 seats overall (even if it has more than 52% of the vote nationally); and third, a party can exceed this 8% rule if it wins the seats in the single-member districts.
Two ballots - one with FPTP candidates (Ward) and the other with just party names (PR). Compensatory seats are based on the sum of both ballots, effectively allocated using the D'Hondt method.
^Ferrara, F (2003). "Electoral coordination and the strategic desertion of strong parties in compensatory mixed systems with negative vote transfers". Electoral Studies.
تحتاج هذه المقالة إلى تهذيب لتتناسب مع دليل الأسلوب في ويكيبيديا. فضلاً، ساهم في تهذيب هذه المقالة من خلال معالجة مشكلات الأسلوب فيها.هذه المقالة يتيمة إذ تصل إليها مقالات أخرى قليلة جدًا. فضلًا، ساعد بإضافة وصلة إليها في مقالات متعلقة بها. (سبتمبر 2017) نذكر في الثبت الآتي ما...
Cet article est une ébauche concernant une série télévisée et le Mexique. Vous pouvez partager vos connaissances en l’améliorant (comment ?) selon les recommandations du projet séries télévisées. Corazón salvaje Titre original Corazón salvaje Genre Telenovela Création Caridad Bravo Adams Olga Ruilópez Réalisation Salvador Garcini Jorge Edgar Ramírez Développement Liliana Abud Participants Aracely Arámbula Eduardo Yáñez Cristián de la Fuente Narration Julio Alemán ...
Para otros usos de este término, véase Pike. Para otros usos de este término, véase Saint-Pierre. Pike RiverMunicipalité de Pike River Municipio Carretera 133 y antigua iglesia Saint-Pierre-de-Vérone Pike RiverUbicación de Pike River en Quebec Coordenadas 45°07′00″N 73°04′00″O / 45.1167, -73.0667Entidad Municipio • País Canadá • Provincia Quebec • Región Montérégie Este (Montérégie) • MRC Brome-MissisquoiAlcalde M...
Pour des articles plus généraux, voir Jeux olympiques d'été de 2020 et Tir à l'arc aux Jeux olympiques. Tokyo 2020 Généralités Sport Tir à l'arc Organisateur(s) CIO Édition 17e Lieu(x) Tokyo Date du 24 juillet au 1er août 2020du 23 au 31 juillet 2021 Participants 128 athlètes (64 hommes ; 64 femmes) Épreuves 5 Site(s) Parc Yumenoshima Site web officiel tokyo2020.org Navigation Rio 2016 Paris 2024 modifier Les épreuves de tir à l'arc lors des Jeux olympiques d'été de 2020...
Selección de fútbol de Guam Datos generalesPaís GuamCódigo FIFA GUMFederación Asociación de fútbol de GuamConfederación AFCSeudónimo(s) MataoSeleccionador Seo Dong-won[1] (desde 2021-)Capitán Jason Cunliffe Más goles Jason Cunliffe (25)Más partidos Jason Cunliffe (64)Clasificación FIFA 205.º (noviembre de 2023)Estadio(s) Estadio Nacional de GuamEquipaciones Primera Segunda Primer partido Guam 1:5 Islas SalomónGuam — 2 de agosto de 1975Juegos del Pacífico Sur 197...
SerangoonFormer constituencyfor the Legislative Council of SingaporeLocation of Serangoon in SingaporeRegionSingaporeElectorate8,402 (1955)Former constituencyCreated1955Abolished1959Seats1Created fromChangiReplaced by Serangoon Gardens Thomson Upper Serangoon Serangoon was a constituency in Singapore from 1951 until 1959.[1] The constituency was represented in the Legislative Council from 1951 until 1955. In 1955, the constituency was formed from Changi Constituency. In 1959, the cons...
Atentado terrorista en el aeropuerto de Burgas Aeropuerto de Burgas Lugar Estacionamiento del aeropuerto de Burgas, Bulgaria. Coordenadas 42°34′13″N 27°30′55″E / 42.57028, 27.51528 Fecha 18 de julio de 2012 Tipo de ataque ataque suicida. Arma(s) artefacto explosivo Muertos 7 (+ el autor)*5 israelíes*2 búlgaros Heridos *30 israelíes*2 rusos Perpetrador(es) Mohamad Hassan El-Husseini[1] El atentado terrorista en el aeropuerto de Burgas fue perpetrado el 18 de...
class=notpageimage| Location of Emu Field in South Australia Obelisk at the Totem One test site Emu Field (also Emu Junction or simply Emu) is the site of Operation Totem, a pair of nuclear tests conducted by the British Government in South Australia during October 1953.[1] The site was surveyed by Len Beadell in 1952. A village and airstrip were constructed for the subsequent testing program.[2] The site was supported from the RAAF Woomera Range Complex. Two British nuclear w...
هذه المقالة يتيمة إذ تصل إليها مقالات أخرى قليلة جدًا. فضلًا، ساعد بإضافة وصلة إليها في مقالات متعلقة بها. (أكتوبر 2023) يفتقر محتوى هذه المقالة إلى الاستشهاد بمصادر. فضلاً، ساهم في تطوير هذه المقالة من خلال إضافة مصادر موثوق بها. أي معلومات غير موثقة يمكن التشكيك بها وإزالتها...
English rugby league footballer (1933–2019) Jack FennellPersonal informationFull nameJack FennellBorn(1933-05-06)6 May 1933Pontefract, EnglandDied3 January 2019(2019-01-03) (aged 85)Playing informationPositionFullback, Wing, Centre, Stand-off Club Years Team Pld T G FG P 1952–65 Featherstone Rovers 319+3 30 455 0 1000 Jack Jackie Fennell (6 May 1933[1] – 3 January 2019) was an English professional rugby league footballer who played in the 1950s and 1960s. H...
Fictional character on Law & Order: Special Victims Unit Fictional character Monique JeffriesLaw & Order characterFirst appearancePayback (season 1)Last appearanceRunaway (season 2)Portrayed byMichelle HurdIn-universe informationTitleNYPD DetectivePartnerKen Briscoe[1]John Munch[2]Seasons1, 2 Detective Monique Jeffries is a fictional character played by Michelle Hurd in the American crime drama television series Law & Order: Special Victims Unit on NBC. A regular c...
Запрос «Оспа» перенаправляется сюда; см. также другие значения. Оспа Девочка из Бангладеш, больная натуральной оспой (1973 год).О полном уничтожении оспы в Бангладеш было объявлено в декабре 1977 года, когда Всемирная организация здравоохранения официально подтвердила эт...
Cincinnati Metro redirects here. For the bus service, see Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority. Metropolitan area in the United StatesGreater Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH–KY–IN Metropolitan Statistical AreaMetropolitan areaDowntown Cincinnati along the Ohio River, viewed from Devou Park in Covington, Kentucky.Cincinnati–Wilmington, OH–KY–IN CSA City of Cincinnati Cincinnati, OH–KY–IN MSA Wilmington, OH µSA Country United StatesSt...
Monterrey Challenger 1995 Sport Tennis Data 2 ottobre - 8 ottobre Campioni Singolare João Cunha e Silva Doppio Mark Knowles / Daniel Nestor 1994 1996 Il Monterrey Challenger 1995 è stato un torneo di tennis facente parte della categoria ATP Challenger Series nell'ambito dell'ATP Challenger Series 1995. Il torneo si è giocato a Monterrey in Messico dal 2 all'8 ottobre 1995 su campi in cemento. Indice 1 Vincitori 1.1 Singolare 1.2 Doppio 2 Collegamenti esterni Vincitori Singolare Lo stesso a...
Линия 2: Хибия Tokyo Metro Электропоезд серии Tokyo Metro 13000 series Открытие первого участка 1961 Длина, км 20,3 Количество станций 21 Максимальное число вагонов в составе поезда 8 Число вагонов в составе поезда 8 Наземные участки Есть Электродепо Сэндзю, Такэноцука Линия Хибия (яп. ...
Ruined abbey in Cumbria, England Furness AbbeyThe abbey in August 2007Location within the former Borough of Barrow-in-FurnessMonastery informationOther namesSt. Mary of FurnessOrderCistercianEstablished1123Disestablished1537Mother houseCongregation of SavignyControlled churches Byland Abbey Calder Abbey Inch Abbey Rushen Abbey Swineshead Abbey PeopleFounder(s)Stephen, Count of BloisSiteLocationThe Vale of Nightshade, Newbarns, Barrow-in-Furness, Cumbria, EnglandCoordinates54°8′7″N 3°11...
First version of Apple Macintosh operating system For the concept of System 1 and System 2 in cognition, see Thinking, Fast and Slow § Two systems. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: System 1 – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template ...
Television station logo Circle 7 redirects here. For other uses, see Circle 7 (disambiguation). This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Circle 7 logo – news · newspa...
American news publication Route Fifty redirects here. For other uses, see Route 50 (disambiguation). Government ExecutiveEditor-in-ChiefTanya Ballard BrownManaging EditorAmelia GruberCategoriesDigital publicationPublisherConstance SayersFounded1969CompanyGovExecCountryUnited StatesBased inWashington, D.C.LanguageEnglishWebsitewww.govexec.comISSN0017-2626 Government Executive is an American media publication based in Washington, D.C., that covers daily government business for civilians, federa...
