Virtual black hole

In quantum gravity, a virtual black hole^[1] is a hypothetical micro black hole that exists temporarily as a result of a quantum fluctuation of spacetime.^[2] It is an example of quantum foam and is the gravitational analog of the virtual electron–positron pairs found in quantum electrodynamics. Theoretical arguments suggest that virtual black holes should have mass on the order of the Planck mass, lifetime around the Planck time, and occur with a number density of approximately one per Planck volume.^[3]

The emergence of virtual black holes at the Planck scale is a consequence of the uncertainty relation.^[4]

${\displaystyle \Delta R_{\mu }\Delta x_{\mu }\geq \ell _{P}^{2}={\frac {\hbar G}{c^{3}}}}$

where ${\displaystyle R_{\mu }}$ is the radius of curvature of spacetime small domain, ${\displaystyle x_{\mu }}$ is the coordinate of the small domain, ${\displaystyle \ell _{P}}$ is the Planck length, ${\displaystyle \hbar }$ is the reduced Planck constant, ${\displaystyle G}$ is the Newtonian constant of gravitation, and ${\displaystyle c}$ is the speed of light. These uncertainty relations are another form of Heisenberg's uncertainty principle at the Planck scale.

Proof

Indeed, these uncertainty relations can be obtained on the basis of Einstein's equations ${\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }={8\pi G \over c^{4}}T_{\mu \nu }}$ where ${\displaystyle G_{\mu \nu }=R_{\mu \nu }-{R \over 2}g_{\mu \nu }}$ is the Einstein tensor, which combines the Ricci tensor, the scalar curvature and the metric tensor; ${\displaystyle \Lambda }$ is the cosmological constant; а ${\displaystyle T_{\mu \nu }}$ is the energy-momentum tensor of matter; ${\displaystyle \pi }$ is the mathematical constant pi; ${\displaystyle c}$ is the speed of light; and ${\displaystyle G}$ is the Newtonian constant of gravitation. Einstein suggested that physical space is Riemannian, i.e. curved and therefore put Riemannian geometry at the basis of the theory of gravity. A small region of Riemannian space is close to flat space.[5] For any tensor field ${\displaystyle N_{\mu \nu ...}}$, we may call ${\displaystyle N_{\mu \nu ...}{\sqrt {-g}}}$ a tensor density, where ${\displaystyle g}$ is the determinant of the metric tensor ${\displaystyle g_{\mu \nu }}$. The integral ${\displaystyle \int N_{\mu \nu ...}{\sqrt {-g}}\,d^{4}x}$ is a tensor if the domain of integration is small. It is not a tensor if the domain of integration is not small, because it then consists of a sum of tensors located at different points and it does not transform in any simple way under a transformation of coordinates.[6] Here we consider only small domains. This is also true for the integration over the three-dimensional hypersurface ${\displaystyle S^{\nu }}$. Thus, the Einstein field equations for a small spacetime domain can be integrated by the three-dimensional hypersurface ${\displaystyle S^{\nu }}$. Have[4][7] ${\displaystyle {\frac {1}{4\pi }}\int \left(G_{\mu \nu }+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }\right){\sqrt {-g}}\,dS^{\nu }={2G \over c^{4}}\int T_{\mu \nu }{\sqrt {-g}}\,dS^{\nu }}$ Since integrable space-time domain is small, we obtain the tensor equation ${\displaystyle R_{\mu }={\frac {2G}{c^{3}}}P_{\mu }}$ where ${\displaystyle P_{\mu }={\frac {1}{c}}\int T_{\mu \nu }{\sqrt {-g}}\,dS^{\nu }}$ is the component of the 4-momentum of matter, ${\displaystyle R_{\mu }={\frac {1}{4\pi }}\int \left(G_{\mu \nu }+\Lambda g_{\mu \nu }\right){\sqrt {-g}}\,dS^{\nu }}$ is the component of the radius of curvature small domain. The resulting tensor equation can be rewritten in another form. Since ${\displaystyle P_{\mu }=mc\,U_{\mu }}$ then ${\displaystyle R_{\mu }={\frac {2G}{c^{3}}}mc\,U_{\mu }=r_{s}\,U_{\mu }}$ where ${\displaystyle r_{s}}$ is the Schwarzschild radius, ${\displaystyle U_{\mu }}$ is the 4-speed, ${\displaystyle m}$ is the gravitational mass. This record reveals the physical meaning of the ${\displaystyle R_{\mu }}$ values as components of the gravitational radius ${\displaystyle r_{\text{s}}}$. In a small area of space-time is almost flat and this equation can be written in the operator form ${\displaystyle {\hat {R}}_{\mu }={\frac {2G}{c^{3}}}{\hat {P}}_{\mu }={\frac {2G}{c^{3}}}(-i\hbar ){\frac {\partial }{\partial \,x^{\mu }}}=-2i\,\ell _{P}^{2}{\frac {\partial }{\partial \,x^{\mu }}}}$ or The basic equation of quantum gravity [4][7] ${\displaystyle -2i\ell _{P}^{2}{\frac {\partial }{\partial x^{\mu }}}|\Psi (x_{\mu })\rangle ={\hat {R}}_{\mu }|\Psi (x_{\mu })\rangle }$ Then the commutator of operators ${\displaystyle {\hat {R}}_{\mu }}$ and ${\displaystyle {\hat {x}}_{\mu }}$ is ${\displaystyle [{\hat {R}}_{\mu },{\hat {x}}_{\mu }]=-2i\ell _{P}^{2}}$ From here follow the specified uncertainty relations ${\displaystyle \Delta R_{\mu }\Delta x_{\mu }\geq \ell _{P}^{2}}$ Substituting the values of ${\displaystyle R_{\mu }={\frac {2G}{c^{3}}}m\,c\,U_{\mu }}$ and ${\displaystyle \ell _{P}^{2}={\frac {\hbar \,G}{c^{3}}}}$ and reducing identical constants from two sides, we get Heisenberg's uncertainty principle ${\displaystyle \Delta P_{\mu }\Delta x_{\mu }=\Delta (mc\,U_{\mu })\Delta x_{\mu }\geq {\frac {\hbar }{2}}}$ In the particular case of a static spherically symmetric field and static distribution of matter ${\displaystyle U_{0}=1,U_{i}=0\,(i=1,2,3)}$ and have remained ${\displaystyle \Delta R_{0}\Delta x_{0}=\Delta r_{\text{s}}\Delta r\geq \ell _{P}^{2}}$ where ${\displaystyle r_{\text{s}}}$ is the Schwarzschild radius, ${\displaystyle r}$ is the radial coordinate. Here ${\displaystyle R_{0}=r_{\text{s}}}$ and ${\displaystyle x_{0}=c\,t=r}$, since the matter moves with velocity of light in the Planck scale. Last uncertainty relation allows make us some estimates of the equations of general relativity at the Planck scale. For example, the equation for the invariant interval ${\displaystyle dS}$ в in the Schwarzschild solution has the form ${\displaystyle dS^{2}=\left(1-{\frac {r_{\text{s}}}{r}}\right)c^{2}dt^{2}-{\frac {dr^{2}}{1-{r_{\text{s}}}/{r}}}-r^{2}(d\Omega ^{2}+\sin ^{2}\Omega d\varphi ^{2})}$ Substitute according to the uncertainty relations ${\displaystyle r_{\text{s}}\approx \ell _{P}^{2}/r}$. We obtain ${\displaystyle dS^{2}\approx \left(1-{\frac {\ell _{P}^{2}}{r^{2}}}\right)c^{2}dt^{2}-{\frac {dr^{2}}{1-{\ell _{P}^{2}}/{r^{2}}}}-r^{2}(d\Omega ^{2}+\sin ^{2}\Omega d\varphi ^{2})}$ It is seen that at the Planck scale ${\displaystyle r=\ell _{P}}$ space-time metric is bounded below by the Planck length (division by zero appears), and on this scale, there are real and virtual Planckian black holes. Similar estimates can be made in other equations of general relativity. For example, analysis of the Hamilton–Jacobi equation for a centrally symmetric gravitational field in spaces of different dimensions (with help of the resulting uncertainty relation) indicates a preference (energy profitability) for three-dimensional space for the emergence of virtual black holes (quantum foam, the basis of the "fabric" of the Universe.).[4][7] This may have predetermined the three-dimensionality of the observed space. Prescribed above uncertainty relation valid for strong gravitational fields, as in any sufficiently small domain of a strong field space-time is essentially flat.

If virtual black holes exist, they provide a mechanism for proton decay.^[8] This is because when a black hole's mass increases via mass falling into the hole, and is theorized to decrease when Hawking radiation is emitted from the hole, the elementary particles emitted are, in general, not the same as those that fell in. Therefore, if two of a proton's constituent quarks fall into a virtual black hole, it is possible for an antiquark and a lepton to emerge, thus violating conservation of baryon number.^[3][9]

The existence of virtual black holes aggravates the black hole information loss paradox, as any physical process may potentially be disrupted by interaction with a virtual black hole.^[10]

See also

• Quantum foam
• Virtual particle
• Quantum tunnelling

References

1. 't Hooft, Gerard (October 2018). "Virtual Black Holes and Space–Time Structure". Foundations of Physics. 48 (10): 1134–1149. Bibcode:2018FoPh...48.1134T. doi:10.1007/s10701-017-0133-0. ISSN 0015-9018. S2CID 189842716.
2. Hawking, S. W. (March 1996). "Virtual black holes". Physical Review D. 53 (6): 3099–3107. arXiv:hep-th/9510029. Bibcode:1996PhRvD..53.3099H. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.53.3099. ISSN 0556-2821. PMID 10020307.
3. Adams, Fred C.; Kane, Gordon L.; Mbonye, Manasse; Perry, Malcolm J. (May 2001). "Proton Decay, Black Holes, and Large Extra Dimensions". International Journal of Modern Physics A. 16 (13): 2399–2410. arXiv:hep-ph/0009154. Bibcode:2001IJMPA..16.2399A. doi:10.1142/S0217751X0100369X. ISSN 0217-751X.
4. Klimets, A.P. (November 2023). "Quantum Gravity" (PDF). Current Research in Statistics & Mathematics. 2 (1): 141–155.
5. Dirac 1975, p. 9
6. Dirac 1975, p. 37
7. Klimets, Alexander (2017). "On the fundamental role of massless form of matter in physics. Quantum gravity" (PDF). Fizika B (9): 23–42.
8. Bambi, Cosimo; Freese, Katherine (2008). "Dangerous implications of a minimum length in quantum gravity". Classical and Quantum Gravity. 25 (19): 195013. arXiv:0803.0749. Bibcode:2008CQGra..25s5013B. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/19/195013. hdl:2027.42/64158. ISSN 0264-9381. S2CID 2040645.
9. Al-Modlej, Abeer; Alsaleh, Salwa; Alshal, Hassan; Ali, Ahmed Farag (2019). "Proton decay and the quantum structure of space–time". Canadian Journal of Physics. 97 (12): 1317–1322. arXiv:1903.02940. Bibcode:2019CaJPh..97.1317A. doi:10.1139/cjp-2018-0423. hdl:1807/96892. ISSN 0008-4204. S2CID 119507878.
10. Giddings, Steven B. (1995). "The black hole information paradox". arXiv:hep-th/9508151.

Further reading

Dirac, P. A. M. (1975). General theory of relativity. New York : Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-21575-2.