Proprietary software is software that grants its creator, publisher, or other rightsholder or rightsholder partner a legal monopoly by modern copyright and intellectual property law to exclude the recipient from freely sharing the software or modifying it, and—in some cases, as is the case with some patent-encumbered and EULA-bound software—from making use of the software on their own, thereby restricting their freedoms.[1]
Proprietary software is a subset of non-free software, a term defined in contrast to free and open-source software; non-commercial licenses such as CC BY-NC are not deemed proprietary, but are non-free. Proprietary software may either be closed-source software or source-available software.[1][2]
Until the late 1960s, computers—especially large and expensive mainframe computers, machines in specially air-conditioned computer rooms—were usually leased to customers rather than sold.[3][4] Service and all software available were usually supplied by manufacturers without separate charge until 1969. Computer vendors usually provided the source code for installed software to customers.[citation needed] Customers who developed software often made it available to the public without charge.[5] Closed source means computer programs whose source code is not published except to licensees. It is available to be modified only by the organization that developed it and those licensed to use the software.
Starting in February 1983 IBM adopted an "object-code-only" model for a growing list of their software and stopped shipping much of the source code,[13][14] even to licensees.
In 1983, binary software became copyrightable in the United States as well by the Apple vs. Franklin law decision,[15] before which only source code was copyrightable.[16] Additionally, the growing availability of millions of computers based on the same microprocessor architecture created for the first time an unfragmented and big enough market for binary distributed software.[16]
The tendency to license proprietary software, rather than sell it, dates from the time period before the existence, then the scope of software copyright protection was clear. These licenses have continued in use after software copyright was recognized in the courts, and are considered to grant the company extra protection compared to copyright law.[17] According to United States federal law, a company can restrict the parties to which it sells but it cannot prevent a buyer from reselling the product. Software licensing agreements usually prohibit resale, enabling the company to maximize revenue.[18]
Traditionally, software was distributed in the form of binary object code that could not be understood or modified by the user,[19] but could be downloaded and run. The user bought a perpetual license to use a particular version of the software.[20]Software as service (SaaS) vendors—who have the majority market share in application software as of 2023[update][21]—rarely offer perpetual licenses.[22] SaaS licenses are usually temporary and charged on a pay-per-usage or subscription basis,[23] although other revenue models such as freemium are also used.[24] For customers, the advantages of temporary licenses include reduced upfront cost, increased flexibility, and lower overall cost compared to a perpetual license.[20] In some cases, the steep one-time cost demanded by sellers of traditional software were out of the reach of smaller businesses, but pay-per-use SaaS models makes the software affordable.[25]
Mixed-source software
Software distributions considered as proprietary may in fact incorporate a "mixed source" model including both free and non-free software in the same distribution.[26] Most if not all so-called proprietary UNIX distributions are mixed source software, bundling open-source components like BIND, Sendmail, X Window System, DHCP, and others along with a purely proprietary kernel and system utilities.[27][28]
Multi-licensing
Some free software packages are also simultaneously available under proprietary terms. Examples include MySQL, Sendmail and ssh. The original copyright holders for a work of free software, even copyleft free software, can use dual-licensing to allow themselves or others to redistribute proprietary versions. Non-copyleft free software (i.e. software distributed under a permissive free software license or released to the public domain) allows anyone to make proprietary redistributions.[29][30] Free software that depends on proprietary software is considered "trapped" by the Free Software Foundation. This includes software written only for Microsoft Windows,[31] or software that could only run on Java, before it became free software.[32]
A software vendor delineates the specific terms of use in an end-user license agreement (EULA). The user may agree to this contract in writing, interactively on screen (clickwrap), or by opening the box containing the software (shrink wrap licensing). License agreements are usually not negotiable.[34]Software patents grant exclusive rights to algorithms, software features, or other patentable subject matter, with coverage varying by jurisdiction. Vendors sometimes grant patent rights to the user in the license agreement.[35] The source code for a piece of proprietary software is routinely handled as a trade secret.[36] Software can be made available with fewer restrictions on licensing or source-code access; software that satisfies certain conditions of freedom and openness is known as "free" or "open-source."[37]
Limitations
Since license agreements do not override applicable copyright law or contract law, provisions in conflict with applicable law are not enforceable.[38] Some software is specifically licensed and not sold, in order to avoid limitations of copyright such as the first-sale doctrine.[39]
Exclusive rights
The owner of proprietary software exercises certain exclusive rights over the software. The owner can restrict the use, inspection of source code, modification of source code, and redistribution.
Vendors typically limit the number of computers on which software can be used, and prohibit the user from installing the software on extra computers.[citation needed] Restricted use is sometimes enforced through a technical measure, such as product activation, a product key or serial number, a hardware key, or copy protection.
Vendors may also distribute versions that remove particular features, or versions which allow only certain fields of endeavor, such as non-commercial, educational, or non-profit use.
Use restrictions vary by license:
Windows Vista Starter is restricted to running a maximum of three concurrent applications.
Windows XP can be installed on one computer, and limits the number of network file sharing connections to 10.[40] The Home Edition disables features present in Windows XP Professional.
Traditionally, Adobe licenses are limited to one user, but allow the user to install a second copy on a home computer or laptop.[41] This is no longer true with the switching to Creative Cloud.
iWork '09, Apple's productivity suite, is available in a five-user family pack, for use on up to five computers in a household.[42]
While most proprietary software is distributed without the source code, some vendors distribute the source code or otherwise make it available to customers. For example, users who have purchased a license for the Internet forum software vBulletin can modify the source for their own site but cannot redistribute it. This is true for many web applications, which must be in source code form when being run by a web server. The source code is covered by a non-disclosure agreement or a license that allows, for example, study and modification, but not redistribution.[45] The text-based email client Pine and certain implementations of Secure Shell are distributed with proprietary licenses that make the source code available.[citation needed]Some licenses for proprietary software allow distributing changes to the source code, but only to others licensed for the product, and some[46] of those modifications are eventually picked up by the vendor.
Some governments fear that proprietary software may include defects or malicious features which would compromise sensitive information. In 2003 Microsoft established a Government Security Program (GSP) to allow governments to view source code and Microsoft security documentation, of which the Chinese government was an early participant.[47][48] The program is part of Microsoft's broader Shared Source Initiative which provides source code access for some products. The Reference Source License (Ms-RSL) and Limited Public License (Ms-LPL) are proprietary software licenses where the source code is made available.
Governments have also been accused of adding such malware to software themselves. According to documents released by Edward Snowden, the NSA has used covert partnerships with software companies to make commercial encryption software exploitable to eavesdropping, or to insert backdoors.[49][50]
Proprietary software vendors can prohibit the users from sharing the software with others. Another unique license is required for another party to use the software.
In the case of proprietary software with source code available, the vendor may also prohibit customers from distributing their modifications to the source code.
Shareware is closed-source software whose owner encourages redistribution at no cost, but which the user sometimes must pay to use after a trial period. The fee usually allows use by a single user or computer. In some cases, software features are restricted during or after the trial period, a practice sometimes called crippleware.
Proprietary software often[citation needed] stores some of its data in file formats that are incompatible with other software, and may also communicate using protocols which are incompatible. Such formats and protocols may be restricted as trade secrets or subject to patents.[citation needed]
Proprietary APIs
A proprietary application programming interface (API) is a software library interface "specific to one device or, more likely to a number of devices within a particular manufacturer's product range."[53] The motivation for using a proprietary API can be vendor lock-in or because standard APIs do not support the device's functionality.[53]
The European Commission, in its March 24, 2004, decision on Microsoft's business practices,[54] quotes, in paragraph 463, Microsoft general manager for C++ development Aaron Contorer as stating in a February 21, 1997, internal Microsoft memo drafted for Bill Gates:
The Windows API is so broad, so deep, and so functional that most ISVs would be crazy not to use it. And it is so deeply embedded in the source code of many Windows apps that there is a huge switching cost to using a different operating system instead.
Early versions of the iPhone SDK were covered by a non-disclosure agreement. The agreement forbade independent developers from discussing the content of the interfaces. Apple discontinued the NDA in October 2008.[55]
Any dependency on the future versions and upgrades for a proprietary software package can create vendor lock-in, entrenching a monopoly position.[56]
Software limited to certain hardware configurations
Proprietary software may also have licensing terms that limit the usage of that software to a specific set of hardware. Apple has such a licensing model for macOS, an operating system which is limited to Apple hardware, both by licensing and various design decisions. This licensing model has been affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.[57]
Proprietary software which is no longer marketed, supported or sold by its owner is called abandonware, the digital form of orphaned works. If the proprietor of a software package should cease to exist, or decide to cease or limit production or support for a proprietary software package, recipients and users of the package may have no recourse if problems are found with the software. Proprietors can fail to improve and support software because of business problems.[58] Support for older or existing versions of a software package may be ended to force users to upgrade and pay for newer versions[59](planned obsolescence). Sometimes another vendor or a software's community themselves can provide support for the software, or the users can migrate to either competing systems with longer support life cycles or to FOSS-based systems.[60]
Proprietary software is not synonymous with commercial software,[64][65] although the two terms are sometimes used synonymously in articles about free software.[66][67] Proprietary software can be distributed at no cost or for a fee, and free software can be distributed at no cost or for a fee.[68] The difference is that whether proprietary software can be distributed, and what the fee would be, is at the proprietor's discretion. With free software, anyone who has a copy can decide whether, and how much, to charge for a copy or related services.[69]
Proprietary software that comes for no cost is called freeware.
Proponents of commercial proprietary software argue that requiring users to pay for software as a product increases funding or time available for the research and development of software. For example, Microsoft says that per-copy fees maximize the profitability of software development.[70]
Proprietary software generally creates greater commercial activity over free software, especially in regard to market revenues.[71] Proprietary software is often sold with a license that gives the end user right to use the software.
^ abSaraswati Experts. "2.5.3". COMPUTER SCIENCE WITH C++. Saraswati House Pvt Ltd. p. 1.27. ISBN978-93-5199-877-8. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
^AUUG, Inc. (March 2003). "Chapter 1. Definitions". AUUGN. AUUG, Inc. p. 51. Retrieved 29 June 2017.
^
Ceruzzi, Paul E. (2003). A History of Modern Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. p. 128. ISBN0-262-53203-4. Although IBM agreed to sell its machines as part of a Consent Decree effective January 1956, leasing continued to be its preferred way of doing business.then everyone started fighting
^"The History of Equipment Leasing", Lease Genie, archived from the original on April 11, 2008, retrieved November 12, 2010, In the 1960s, IBM and Xerox recognized that substantial sums could be made from the financing of their equipment. The leasing of computer and office equipment that occurred then was a significant contribution to leasings [sic] growth, since many companies were exposed to equipment leasing for the first time when they leased such equipment.
^Hamilton, Thomas W. (1969). IBM's Unbundling Decision: Consequences for Users and the Industry. Programming Sciences Corporation.
^IBM (n.d.). "Chronological History of IBM: 1960s". Retrieved May 28, 2016. Rather than offer hardware, services and software exclusively in packages, marketers 'unbundled' the components and offered them for sale individually. Unbundling gave birth to the multibillion-dollar software and services industries, of which IBM is today a world leader.
^Swann, Matthew (18 November 2004). Executable Code is Not the Proper Subject of Copyright Law (Technical report). Cal Poly State University. CPSLO-CSC-04-02.
^Gallant, John (1985-03-18). "IBM policy draws fire - Users say source code rules hamper change". Computerworld. Retrieved 2015-12-27. While IBM's policy of withholding source code for selected software products has already marked its second anniversary, users are only now beginning to cope with the impact of that decision. But whether or not the advent of object-code-only products has affected their day-to-day DP operations, some users remain angry about IBM's decision. Announced in February 1983, IBM's object-code-only policy has been applied to a growing list of Big Blue system software products
^ abLandley, Rob (2009-05-23). "May 23, 2009". landley.net. Archived from the original on Dec 8, 2015. Retrieved 2015-12-02. So if open source used to be the norm back in the 1960's and 70's, how did this _change_? Where did proprietary software come from, and when, and how? How did Richard Stallman's little utopia at the MIT AI lab crumble and force him out into the wilderness to try to rebuild it? Two things changed in the early 80's: the exponentially growing installed base of microcomputer hardware reached critical mass around 1980, and a legal decision altered copyright law to cover binaries in 1983. Increasing volume: The microprocessor creates millions of identical computers
^Terasaki 2013, p. 469. sfn error: no target: CITEREFTerasaki2013 (help)
^Terasaki 2013, pp. 469–470. sfn error: no target: CITEREFTerasaki2013 (help)
^Boyle 2003, p. 45. sfn error: no target: CITEREFBoyle2003 (help)
^Engelfriet, Arnoud (August–September 2006). "The best of both worlds". Intellectual Asset Management (IAM) (19). Gavin Stewart. Archived from the original on 2013-09-14. Retrieved 2008-05-19.
^Daniel A. Tysver (2008-11-23). "Why Protect Software Through Patents". Bitlaw. Retrieved 2009-06-03. In connection with the software, an issued patent may prevent others from utilizing a certain algorithm (such as the GIF image compression algorithm) without permission, or may prevent others from creating software programs that perform a function in a certain way. In connection with computer software, copyright law can be used to prevent the total duplication of a software program, as well as the copying of a portion of software code.
^Donovan, S. (1994). "Patent, copyright and trade secret protection for software". IEEE Potentials. 13 (3): 20. doi:10.1109/45.310923. S2CID19873766. Essentially there are only three ways to protect computer software under the law: patent it, register a copyright for it, or keep it as a trade secret.
^Eben Moglen (2005-02-12). "Why the FSF gets copyright assignments from contributors". Retrieved 2017-05-01. Under US copyright law, which is the law under which most free software programs have historically been first published, [...] only the copyright holder or someone having assignment of the copyright can enforce the license.
^Microsoft Corporation (2005-04-01). "End-User License Agreement for Microsoft Software: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Edition Service Pack 2"(PDF). Microsoft. p. Page 1. Retrieved 2009-04-29. You may install, use, access, display and run one copy of the Software on a single computer, such as a workstation, terminal or another device ("Workstation Computer"). The Software may not be used by more than two (2) processors at any one time on any single Workstation Computer. ... You may permit a maximum of ten (10) computers or other electronic devices (each a 'Device') to connect to the Workstation Computer to utilize one or more of the following services of the Software: File Services, Print Services, Internet Information Services, Internet Connection Sharing and telephony services.
^Tony Patton (2008-11-21). "Protect your JavaScript with obfuscation". TechRepublic. Archived from the original on March 15, 2014. Retrieved May 2, 2022. While the Web promotes the sharing of such code, there are times when you or a client may not want to share their JavaScript code. This may be due to the sensitive nature of data within the code, proprietary calculations, or any other scenario.
^The Linux Information Project (2006-04-29). "Vendor Lock-in Definition". Retrieved 2009-06-11. Vendor lock-in, or just lock-in, is the situation in which customers are dependent on a single manufacturer or supplier for some product [...] This dependency is typically a result of standards that are controlled by the vendor [...] It can grant the vendor some extent of monopoly power [...] The best way for an organization to avoid becoming a victim of vendor lock-in is to use products that conform to free, industry-wide standards. Free standards are those that can be used by anyone and are not controlled by a single company. In the case of computers, this can usually be accomplished by using free software rather than proprietary software (i.e., commercial software).
^Bell, John (October 1, 2009). "Opening the Source of Art". Technology Innovation Management Review. Archived from the original on March 30, 2014. Retrieved May 2, 2022. that no further patches to the title would be forthcoming. The community was predictably upset. Instead of giving up on the game, users decided that if Activision wasn't going to fix the bugs, they would. They wanted to save the game by getting Activision to open the source so it could be kept alive beyond the point where Activision lost interest. With some help from members of the development team that were active on fan forums, they were eventually able to convince Activision to release Call to Power II's source code in October of 2003.
^Wen, Howard (June 10, 2004). "Keeping the Myths Alive". Linux Dev Center. Archived from the original on April 6, 2013. Retrieved December 22, 2012. fans of the Myth trilogy have taken this idea a step further: they have official access to the source code for the Myth games. Organized under the name MythDevelopers, this all-volunteer group of programmers, artists, and other talented people devote their time to improving and supporting further development of the Myth game series.
^Largent, Andy (October 8, 2003). "Homeworld Source Code Released". Inside Mac Games. Archived from the original on October 12, 2013. Retrieved November 24, 2012. With the release of Homeworld 2 for the PC, Relic Entertainment has decided to give back to their impressive fan community by releasing the source code to the original Homeworld.
^Havoc Pennington (2008-03-02). "Debian Tutorial". Archived from the original on 2018-01-29. Retrieved 2009-06-04. It is important to distinguish commercial software from proprietary software. Proprietary software is non-free software, while commercial software is software sold for money.
^Michael K. Johnson (1996-09-01). "Licenses and Copyright". Retrieved 2009-06-16. If you program for Linux, you do need to understand licensing, no matter if you are writing free software or commercial software.
^Eric S. Raymond (2003-12-29). "Proprietary, Jargon File". Retrieved 2009-06-12. Proprietary software should be distinguished from commercial software. It is possible for the software to be commercial [...] without being proprietary. The reverse is also possible, for example in binary-only freeware.
mir-46/mir-47/mir-281 microRNA precursor familyPredicted secondary structure and sequence conservation of mir-46IdentifiersSymbolmir-46RfamRF00249miRBaseMI0000017 miRBase familyMIPF0000087Other dataRNA typeGene; miRNADomain(s)EukaryotaGOGO:0035195 GO:0035068SOSO:0001244PDB structuresPDBe In molecular biology, mir-46 (MI0000017) and mir-47 (MI0000018) are microRNA expressed in C. elegans from related hairpin precursor sequences.[1] The predicted hairpin precursor sequences for Drosophila …
An Ró-OnórachBoris Johnson BeathaisnéisBreith(en-gb) Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson19 Meitheamh 1964 59 bliana d'aoisNua-Eabhrac (Stáit Aontaithe Mheiriceá) Ball den 58ú Parlaimint sa Ríocht Aontaithe 12 Nollaig 2019 – 12 Meitheamh 2023 (éirí as) Téarma parlaiminte: 58ú Parlaimint na Ríochta Aontaithe Toghcheantar: Uxbridge and South Ruislip (en) Toghadh i: An chéad olltoghchán eile sa Ríocht Aontaithe Aire an Aontais 26 Iúil 2019 – 6 Meán Fómhair 20…
Naturfreibad Eiserbachsee Naturbad Pulvermaar in der Vulkaneifel Großer Teich im Strandbad (Frankenthal) Ein Naturbad ist eine eindeutig begrenzte Anlage, die aus einer für Badezwecke geeigneten und gekennzeichneten Fläche eines Badegewässers sowie einer dieser Wasserfläche zugeordneten und abgegrenzten Landfläche besteht. Es ist mit bädertypischen Ausbauten (z. B. Sprunganlage, Wasserrutsche) versehen. Zu den Naturbädern gehören z. B. Fluss- oder Binnenseebäder. Künstlich angelegte S…
class=notpageimage| Location with respect to Central Mexico City Church of San Jerónimo Aculco Garden and open chapel, Church of San Jerónimo Aculco Street in San Jerónimo Lídice San Jerónimo Lídice, or San Jerónimo Aculco, is a former village now part of Mexico City in the Magdalena Contreras borough in the southwest of the city. A settlement on this spot, Aculco, dates back to Toltec times; its name means where the water turns. The village specialized in fruit and vegetable production. …
Daftar keuskupan di Benin adalah sebuah daftar yang memuat dan menjabarkan pembagian terhadap wilayah administratif Gereja Katolik Roma yang dipimpin oleh seorang uskup ataupun ordinaris di Benin. Konferensi para uskup Benin bergabung dalam Konferensi Waligereja Benin. Per Juni 2020, terdapat 10 buah yurisdiksi, di mana 2 merupakan keuskupan agung dan 8 lainnya merupakan keuskupan sufragan. Daftar keuskupan Provinsi Gerejawi Cotonou Keuskupan Agung Cotonou: Roger Houngbédji, O.P. Keuskupan Abom…
2002 Indian filmRaghavaOfficial posterDirected byY. Nageswara RaoWritten bySatish Vegesna (dialogue)Screenplay byY. Nageswara RaoProduced byL. B. ReddySureshStarring Suresh Rajasree CinematographyPoornaMusic byShashi PreetamRelease date 1 February 2002 (2002-02-01) CountryIndiaLanguageTelugu Raghava is a 2002 Indian Telugu-language film directed by Y. Nageswara Rao and starring Suresh and Rajasree. The film was a box office failure.[1] Cast Suresh as Raghava Reddy Rajasree…
Lutsch-Satellit im Popow-Kommunikationsmuseum St. Petersburg Lutsch (russisch Луч für Strahl, auch in der englischen Schreibweise Luch) ist eine Serie von russischen Kommunikationssatelliten. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Entwicklung und Einsatz 2 Systemkonfiguration 3 Startliste 4 Weblinks 5 Einzelnachweise Entwicklung und Einsatz Ähnlich den amerikanischen TDRS-Satelliten übertragen sie Signale zwischen Raumflugkörpern (zum Beispiel der ISS) und der Erde. Entwickelt wurden sie ursprünglich für…
Ariel Rios Federal BuildingThe entrance to the Ariel Rios Federal Building across the street from the NoMa–Gallaudet U station of the Washington Metro in 2018General informationAddress99 New York Avenue NETown or cityWashington, D.C.CountryUnited States of AmericaCoordinates38°54′28″N 77°00′18″W / 38.90779°N 77.00494°W / 38.90779; -77.00494Current tenantsBureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and ExplosivesConstruction started2002Completed2008InauguratedMay 29…
Untuk kegunaan lain, lihat Misteri dari Gunung Merapi (disambiguasi). Misteri dari Gunung Merapi II: Titisan Roh Nyai KembangSutradara Lilik Sudjio Produser Budhi Sutrisno Gunawan Suryajaya Aland Soesanto Ditulis oleh Asmadi Sjafar SkenarioDarto JonedBerdasarkanMisteri dari Gunung MerapiPemeranFendy PradanaIda IashaFarida PashaYurike PrastikaPenata musikHarry SabarPenyuntingJ. SurasaDistributorPT. Firman Mercu Alam FilmTanggal rilis1990Durasi96 menitNegaraBahasa Indonesia PrekuelMisteri da…
Augusta von ZitzewitzAugusta von Zitzewitz by Mario von Bucovich, ca 1930Born26 December 1880Berlin, GermanyDied14 November 1960BerlinOccupationartistSpouseErich Römer (1888-1934)ChildrenIlse-Marie Römer (1915-1964)Parent(s)Coelestin Friedrich Adolf Karl von Zitzewitz (1847-1892)Elise Köbel (1847-1922) Augusta von Zitzewitz (26 December 1880 – 14 November 1960) was a German artist, based, for most of her working life, in Berlin. Early on in her career she was associated with the Berlin Sece…
The Grupello-Haus (Grupello house) is a three-storey building located at 4 Marktplatz, Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. The original size of the building was likely half of its current size. History The Grupello-Haus in 2010 It is believed to have been designed by the Italian architect Matteo Alberti (architect) [de] in 1706 for Duke Johann Wilhelm. The Duke gave the house to his Flemish court sculptor Gabriël Grupello in 1708 and the name of the house is derived from …
Heritage-listed building in Sydney, Australia Haymarket Post OfficeHaymarket Post Office, 633–635 George Street, SydneyLocation633–635 George Street, Sydney, City of Sydney, New South Wales, AustraliaCoordinates33°52′42″S 151°12′19″E / 33.8784°S 151.2052°E / -33.8784; 151.2052Built1927–1928ArchitectE. Henderson New South Wales Heritage RegisterOfficial nameKing George Hotel (former) and Haymarket Post OfficeTypestate heritage (complex / group)Designated2…
العلاقات الألمانية الإستونية ألمانيا إستونيا ألمانيا إستونيا تعديل مصدري - تعديل العلاقات الألمانية الإستونية هي العلاقات الثنائية التي تجمع بين ألمانيا وإستونيا.[1][2][3][4][5] مقارنة بين البلدين هذه مقارنة عامة ومرجعية للدولتين: وجه المق…
A variety of ammonite forms, from Ernst Haeckel's 1904 Kunstformen der Natur. This list of ammonites is a comprehensive listing of genera that are included in the subclass †Ammonoidea, excluding purely vernacular terms. The list includes genera that are commonly accepted as valid, as well those that may be invalid or doubtful (nomina dubia), or were not formally published (nomina nuda), as well as junior synonyms of more established names, and genera that are no longer considered ammonites. Re…
هذه المقالة يتيمة إذ تصل إليها مقالات أخرى قليلة جدًا. فضلًا، ساعد بإضافة وصلة إليها في مقالات متعلقة بها. (مارس 2023) يشير مصطلح التعديلات في علم الوراثة إلى كل من التغيرات والتعديلات التي تحدث طبيعيًا وهندسيًا في الحمض النووي. تحدث الطفرات العارضية أو الطبيعية من خلال أخطاء م…
This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification. Please help by adding reliable sources. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libelous.Find sources: Klaus Derendorf – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Klaus DerendorfBack…
Spanish noblewoman In this German name, the surname is Hohenlohe-Langenburg. Her Serene HighnessVictoria von Hohenlohe-Langenburg20th Duchess of MedinaceliBornVictoria Elisabeth von Hohenlohe-Langenburg (1997-03-17) 17 March 1997 (age 26)Málaga, SpainNoble familyHohenlohe-Langenburg (agnatic)Medinaceli (cognatic)Spouse(s) Maxime Corneille Iribarren (m. 2023)FatherPrince Marco of Hohenlohe-LangenburgMotherSandra Schmidt-Polex Princess Victoria Elisabet…
2018 film directed by Arunraja Kamaraj KanaaTheatrical release posterDirected byArunraja KamarajWritten byArunraja KamarajProduced bySivakarthikeyanStarringSathyarajAishwarya RajeshSivakarthikeyanDarshanCinematographyDinesh B. KrishnanEdited byRubenMusic byDhibu Ninan ThomasProductioncompanySivakarthikeyan ProductionsRelease date 21 December 2018 (2018-12-21) Running time145 minutesCountryIndiaLanguageTamil Kanaa (transl. To dream) is a 2018 Indian Tamil-language sports dram…