In the mathematical theory of stochastic processes, variable-order Markov (VOM) models are an important class of models that extend the well known Markov chain models. In contrast to the Markov chain models, where each random variable in a sequence with a Markov property depends on a fixed number of random variables, in VOM models this number of conditioning random variables may vary based on the specific observed realization.
This realization sequence is often called the context; therefore the VOM models are also called context trees.[1] VOM models are nicely rendered by colorized probabilistic suffix trees (PST).[2] The flexibility in the number of conditioning random variables turns out to be of real advantage for many applications, such as statistical analysis, classification and prediction.[3][4][5]
Example
Consider for example a sequence of random variables, each of which takes a value from the ternary alphabet{a, b, c}. Specifically, consider the string constructed from infinite concatenations of the sub-string aaabc: aaabcaaabcaaabcaaabc…aaabc.
The VOM model of maximal order 2 can approximate the above string using only the following five conditional probability components: Pr(a | aa) = 0.5, Pr(b | aa) = 0.5, Pr(c | b) = 1.0, Pr(a | c)= 1.0, Pr(a | ca) = 1.0.
In this example, Pr(c | ab) = Pr(c | b) = 1.0; therefore, the shorter context b is sufficient to determine the next character. Similarly, the VOM model of maximal order 3 can generate the string exactly using only five conditional probability components, which are all equal to 1.0.
To construct the Markov chain of order 1 for the next character in that string, one must estimate the following 9 conditional probability components: Pr(a | a), Pr(a | b), Pr(a | c), Pr(b | a), Pr(b | b), Pr(b | c), Pr(c | a), Pr(c | b), Pr(c | c). To construct the Markov chain of order 2 for the next character, one must estimate 27 conditional probability components: Pr(a | aa), Pr(a | ab), …, Pr(c | cc). And to construct the Markov chain of order three for the next character one must estimate the following 81 conditional probability components: Pr(a | aaa), Pr(a | aab), …, Pr(c | ccc).
In practical settings there is seldom sufficient data to accurately estimate the exponentially increasing number of conditional probability components as the order of the Markov chain increases.
The variable-order Markov model assumes that in realistic settings, there are certain realizations of states (represented by contexts) in which some past states are independent from the future states; accordingly, "a great reduction in the number of model parameters can be achieved."[1]
Definition
Let A be a state space (finite alphabet) of size .
Consider a sequence with the Markov property of n realizations of random variables, where is the state (symbol) at position i, and the concatenation of states and is denoted by .
Given a training set of observed states, , the construction algorithm of the VOM models[3][4][5] learns a model P that provides a probability assignment for each state in the sequence given its past (previously observed symbols) or future states.
Specifically, the learner generates a conditional probability distribution for a symbol given a context , where the * sign represents a sequence of states of any length, including the empty context.
VOM models attempt to estimate conditional distributions of the form where the context length varies depending on the available statistics.
In contrast, conventional Markov models attempt to estimate these conditional distributions by assuming a fixed contexts' length and, hence, can be considered as special cases of the VOM models.
Effectively, for a given training sequence, the VOM models are found to obtain better model parameterization than the fixed-order Markov models that leads to a better variance-bias tradeoff of the learned models.[3][4][5]
Application areas
Various efficient algorithms have been devised for estimating the parameters of the VOM model.[4]
^ abcRissanen, J. (Sep 1983). "A Universal Data Compression System". IEEE Transactions on Information Theory. 29 (5): 656–664. doi:10.1109/TIT.1983.1056741.
^ abcdShmilovici, A.; Ben-Gal, I. (2007). "Using a VOM Model for Reconstructing Potential Coding Regions in EST Sequences". Computational Statistics. 22 (1): 49–69. doi:10.1007/s00180-007-0021-8. S2CID2737235.
^Browning, Sharon R. "Multilocus association mapping using variable-length Markov chains." The American Journal of Human Genetics 78.6 (2006): 903–913.