Divisor function

"Robin's theorem" redirects here. For Robbins' theorem in graph theory, see Robbins' theorem.

Divisor function σ₀(n) up to n = 250

Sigma function σ₁(n) up to n = 250

Sum of the squares of divisors, σ₂(n), up to n = 250

Sum of cubes of divisors, σ₃(n) up to n = 250

In mathematics, and specifically in number theory, a divisor function is an arithmetic function related to the divisors of an integer. When referred to as the divisor function, it counts the number of divisors of an integer (including 1 and the number itself). It appears in a number of remarkable identities, including relationships on the Riemann zeta function and the Eisenstein series of modular forms. Divisor functions were studied by Ramanujan, who gave a number of important congruences and identities; these are treated separately in the article Ramanujan's sum.

A related function is the divisor summatory function, which, as the name implies, is a sum over the divisor function.

Definition

The sum of positive divisors function σ_z(n), for a real or complex number z, is defined as the sum of the zth powers of the positive divisors of n. It can be expressed in sigma notation as

${\displaystyle \sigma _{z}(n)=\sum _{d\mid n}d^{z}\,\!,}$

where ${\displaystyle {d\mid n}}$ is shorthand for "d divides n". The notations d(n), ν(n) and τ(n) (for the German Teiler = divisors) are also used to denote σ₀(n), or the number-of-divisors function^[1][2] (OEIS: A000005). When z is 1, the function is called the sigma function or sum-of-divisors function,^[1][3] and the subscript is often omitted, so σ(n) is the same as σ₁(n) (OEIS: A000203).

The aliquot sum s(n) of n is the sum of the proper divisors (that is, the divisors excluding n itself, OEIS: A001065), and equals σ₁(n) − n; the aliquot sequence of n is formed by repeatedly applying the aliquot sum function.

Example

For example, σ₀(12) is the number of the divisors of 12:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\sigma _{0}(12)&=1^{0}+2^{0}+3^{0}+4^{0}+6^{0}+12^{0}\\&=1+1+1+1+1+1=6,\end{aligned}}}$

while σ₁(12) is the sum of all the divisors:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\sigma _{1}(12)&=1^{1}+2^{1}+3^{1}+4^{1}+6^{1}+12^{1}\\&=1+2+3+4+6+12=28,\end{aligned}}}$

and the aliquot sum s(12) of proper divisors is:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}s(12)&=1^{1}+2^{1}+3^{1}+4^{1}+6^{1}\\&=1+2+3+4+6=16.\end{aligned}}}$

σ₋₁(n) is sometimes called the abundancy index of n, and we have:

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\sigma _{-1}(12)&=1^{-1}+2^{-1}+3^{-1}+4^{-1}+6^{-1}+12^{-1}\\[6pt]&={\tfrac {1}{1}}+{\tfrac {1}{2}}+{\tfrac {1}{3}}+{\tfrac {1}{4}}+{\tfrac {1}{6}}+{\tfrac {1}{12}}\\[6pt]&={\tfrac {12}{12}}+{\tfrac {6}{12}}+{\tfrac {4}{12}}+{\tfrac {3}{12}}+{\tfrac {2}{12}}+{\tfrac {1}{12}}\\[6pt]&={\tfrac {12+6+4+3+2+1}{12}}={\tfrac {28}{12}}={\tfrac {7}{3}}={\tfrac {\sigma _{1}(12)}{12}}\end{aligned}}}$

Table of values

The cases x = 2 to 5 are listed in OEIS: A001157 through OEIS: A001160, x = 6 to 24 are listed in OEIS: A013954 through OEIS: A013972.

n	prime factorization	𝜎0(n)	𝜎1(n)	𝜎2(n)	𝜎3(n)	𝜎4(n)
1	1	1	1	1	1	1
2	2	2	3	5	9	17
3	3	2	4	10	28	82
4	2^2	3	7	21	73	273
5	5	2	6	26	126	626
6	2×3	4	12	50	252	1394
7	7	2	8	50	344	2402
8	2^3	4	15	85	585	4369
9	3^2	3	13	91	757	6643
10	2×5	4	18	130	1134	10642
11	11	2	12	122	1332	14642
12	2^2×3	6	28	210	2044	22386
13	13	2	14	170	2198	28562
14	2×7	4	24	250	3096	40834
15	3×5	4	24	260	3528	51332
16	2^4	5	31	341	4681	69905
17	17	2	18	290	4914	83522
18	2×3^2	6	39	455	6813	112931
19	19	2	20	362	6860	130322
20	2^2×5	6	42	546	9198	170898
21	3×7	4	32	500	9632	196964
22	2×11	4	36	610	11988	248914
23	23	2	24	530	12168	279842
24	2^3×3	8	60	850	16380	358258
25	5^2	3	31	651	15751	391251
26	2×13	4	42	850	19782	485554
27	3^3	4	40	820	20440	538084
28	2^2×7	6	56	1050	25112	655746
29	29	2	30	842	24390	707282
30	2×3×5	8	72	1300	31752	872644
31	31	2	32	962	29792	923522
32	2^5	6	63	1365	37449	1118481
33	3×11	4	48	1220	37296	1200644
34	2×17	4	54	1450	44226	1419874
35	5×7	4	48	1300	43344	1503652
36	2^2×3^2	9	91	1911	55261	1813539
37	37	2	38	1370	50654	1874162
38	2×19	4	60	1810	61740	2215474
39	3×13	4	56	1700	61544	2342084
40	2^3×5	8	90	2210	73710	2734994
41	41	2	42	1682	68922	2825762
42	2×3×7	8	96	2500	86688	3348388
43	43	2	44	1850	79508	3418802
44	2^2×11	6	84	2562	97236	3997266
45	3^2×5	6	78	2366	95382	4158518
46	2×23	4	72	2650	109512	4757314
47	47	2	48	2210	103824	4879682
48	2^4×3	10	124	3410	131068	5732210
49	7^2	3	57	2451	117993	5767203
50	2×5^2	6	93	3255	141759	6651267

Properties

Formulas at prime powers

For a prime number p,

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\sigma _{0}(p)&=2\\\sigma _{0}(p^{n})&=n+1\\\sigma _{1}(p)&=p+1\end{aligned}}}$

because by definition, the factors of a prime number are 1 and itself. Also, where p_n# denotes the primorial,

${\displaystyle \sigma _{0}(p_{n}\#)=2^{n}}$

since n prime factors allow a sequence of binary selection (${\displaystyle p_{i}}$ or 1) from n terms for each proper divisor formed. However, these are not in general the smallest numbers whose number of divisors is a power of two; instead, the smallest such number may be obtained by multiplying together the first n Fermi–Dirac primes, prime powers whose exponent is a power of two.^[4]

Clearly, ${\displaystyle 1<\sigma _{0}(n)<n}$ for all ${\displaystyle n>2}$, and ${\displaystyle \sigma _{x}(n)>n}$ for all ${\displaystyle n>1}$, ${\displaystyle x>0}$ .

The divisor function is multiplicative (since each divisor c of the product mn with ${\displaystyle \gcd(m,n)=1}$ distinctively correspond to a divisor a of m and a divisor b of n), but not completely multiplicative:

${\displaystyle \gcd(a,b)=1\Longrightarrow \sigma _{x}(ab)=\sigma _{x}(a)\sigma _{x}(b).}$

The consequence of this is that, if we write

${\displaystyle n=\prod _{i=1}^{r}p_{i}^{a_{i}}}$

where r = ω(n) is the number of distinct prime factors of n, p_i is the ith prime factor, and a_i is the maximum power of p_i by which n is divisible, then we have: ^[5]

${\displaystyle \sigma _{x}(n)=\prod _{i=1}^{r}\sum _{j=0}^{a_{i}}p_{i}^{jx}=\prod _{i=1}^{r}\left(1+p_{i}^{x}+p_{i}^{2x}+\cdots +p_{i}^{a_{i}x}\right).}$

which, when x ≠ 0, is equivalent to the useful formula: ^[5]

${\displaystyle \sigma _{x}(n)=\prod _{i=1}^{r}{\frac {p_{i}^{(a_{i}+1)x}-1}{p_{i}^{x}-1}}.}$

When x = 0, ${\displaystyle \sigma _{0}(n)}$ is: ^[5]

${\displaystyle \sigma _{0}(n)=\prod _{i=1}^{r}(a_{i}+1).}$

This result can be directly deduced from the fact that all divisors of ${\displaystyle n}$ are uniquely determined by the distinct tuples ${\displaystyle (x_{1},x_{2},...,x_{i},...,x_{r})}$ of integers with ${\displaystyle 0\leq x_{i}\leq a_{i}}$ (i.e. ${\displaystyle a_{i}+1}$ independent choices for each ${\displaystyle x_{i}}$).

For example, if n is 24, there are two prime factors (p₁ is 2; p₂ is 3); noting that 24 is the product of 2³×3¹, a₁ is 3 and a₂ is 1. Thus we can calculate ${\displaystyle \sigma _{0}(24)}$ as so:

${\displaystyle \sigma _{0}(24)=\prod _{i=1}^{2}(a_{i}+1)=(3+1)(1+1)=4\cdot 2=8.}$

The eight divisors counted by this formula are 1, 2, 4, 8, 3, 6, 12, and 24.

Other properties and identities

Euler proved the remarkable recurrence:^[6][7][8]

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}\sigma _{1}(n)&=\sigma _{1}(n-1)+\sigma _{1}(n-2)-\sigma _{1}(n-5)-\sigma _{1}(n-7)+\sigma _{1}(n-12)+\sigma _{1}(n-15)+\cdots \\[12mu]&=\sum _{i\in \mathbb {N} }(-1)^{i+1}\left(\sigma _{1}\left(n-{\frac {1}{2}}\left(3i^{2}-i\right)\right)+\sigma _{1}\left(n-{\frac {1}{2}}\left(3i^{2}+i\right)\right)\right),\end{aligned}}}$

where ${\displaystyle \sigma _{1}(0)=n}$ if it occurs and ${\displaystyle \sigma _{1}(x)=0}$ for ${\displaystyle x<0}$, and ${\displaystyle {\tfrac {1}{2}}\left(3i^{2}\mp i\right)}$ are consecutive pairs of generalized pentagonal numbers (OEIS: A001318, starting at offset 1). Indeed, Euler proved this by logarithmic differentiation of the identity in his pentagonal number theorem.

For a non-square integer, n, every divisor, d, of n is paired with divisor n/d of n and ${\displaystyle \sigma _{0}(n)}$ is even; for a square integer, one divisor (namely ${\displaystyle {\sqrt {n}}}$) is not paired with a distinct divisor and ${\displaystyle \sigma _{0}(n)}$ is odd. Similarly, the number ${\displaystyle \sigma _{1}(n)}$ is odd if and only if n is a square or twice a square.^[9]

We also note s(n) = σ(n) − n. Here s(n) denotes the sum of the proper divisors of n, that is, the divisors of n excluding n itself. This function is used to recognize perfect numbers, which are the n such that s(n) = n. If s(n) > n, then n is an abundant number, and if s(n) < n, then n is a deficient number.

If n is a power of 2, ${\displaystyle n=2^{k}}$, then ${\displaystyle \sigma (n)=2\cdot 2^{k}-1=2n-1}$ and ${\displaystyle s(n)=n-1}$, which makes n almost-perfect.

As an example, for two primes ${\displaystyle p,q:p<q}$, let

${\displaystyle n=p\,q}$.

Then

${\displaystyle \sigma (n)=(p+1)(q+1)=n+1+(p+q),}$

${\displaystyle \varphi (n)=(p-1)(q-1)=n+1-(p+q),}$

and

${\displaystyle n+1=(\sigma (n)+\varphi (n))/2,}$

${\displaystyle p+q=(\sigma (n)-\varphi (n))/2,}$

where ${\displaystyle \varphi (n)}$ is Euler's totient function.

Then, the roots of

${\displaystyle (x-p)(x-q)=x^{2}-(p+q)x+n=x^{2}-[(\sigma (n)-\varphi (n))/2]x+[(\sigma (n)+\varphi (n))/2-1]=0}$

express p and q in terms of σ(n) and φ(n) only, requiring no knowledge of n or ${\displaystyle p+q}$, as

${\displaystyle p=(\sigma (n)-\varphi (n))/4-{\sqrt {[(\sigma (n)-\varphi (n))/4]^{2}-[(\sigma (n)+\varphi (n))/2-1]}},}$

${\displaystyle q=(\sigma (n)-\varphi (n))/4+{\sqrt {[(\sigma (n)-\varphi (n))/4]^{2}-[(\sigma (n)+\varphi (n))/2-1]}}.}$

Also, knowing n and either ${\displaystyle \sigma (n)}$ or ${\displaystyle \varphi (n)}$, or, alternatively, ${\displaystyle p+q}$ and either ${\displaystyle \sigma (n)}$ or ${\displaystyle \varphi (n)}$ allows an easy recovery of p and q.

In 1984, Roger Heath-Brown proved that the equality

${\displaystyle \sigma _{0}(n)=\sigma _{0}(n+1)}$

is true for infinitely many values of n, see OEIS: A005237.

Dirichlet convolutions

Main article: Dirichlet convolution

By definition:$${\displaystyle \sigma =\operatorname {Id} *\mathbf {1} }$$By Möbius inversion:$${\displaystyle \operatorname {Id} =\sigma *\mu }$$

Series relations

Two Dirichlet series involving the divisor function are: ^[10]

${\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\sigma _{a}(n)}{n^{s}}}=\zeta (s)\zeta (s-a)\quad {\text{for}}\quad s>1,s>a+1,}$

where ${\displaystyle \zeta }$ is the Riemann zeta function. The series for d(n) = σ₀(n) gives: ^[10]

${\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {d(n)}{n^{s}}}=\zeta ^{2}(s)\quad {\text{for}}\quad s>1,}$

and a Ramanujan identity^[11]

${\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {\sigma _{a}(n)\sigma _{b}(n)}{n^{s}}}={\frac {\zeta (s)\zeta (s-a)\zeta (s-b)\zeta (s-a-b)}{\zeta (2s-a-b)}},}$

which is a special case of the Rankin–Selberg convolution.

A Lambert series involving the divisor function is: ^[12]

${\displaystyle \sum _{n=1}^{\infty }q^{n}\sigma _{a}(n)=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }\sum _{j=1}^{\infty }n^{a}q^{j\,n}=\sum _{n=1}^{\infty }{\frac {n^{a}q^{n}}{1-q^{n}}}}$

for arbitrary complex |q| ≤ 1 and a. This summation also appears as the Fourier series of the Eisenstein series and the invariants of the Weierstrass elliptic functions.

For ${\displaystyle k>0}$, there is an explicit series representation with Ramanujan sums ${\displaystyle c_{m}(n)}$ as :^[13]

${\displaystyle \sigma _{k}(n)=\zeta (k+1)n^{k}\sum _{m=1}^{\infty }{\frac {c_{m}(n)}{m^{k+1}}}.}$

The computation of the first terms of ${\displaystyle c_{m}(n)}$ shows its oscillations around the "average value" ${\displaystyle \zeta (k+1)n^{k}}$:

${\displaystyle \sigma _{k}(n)=\zeta (k+1)n^{k}\left[1+{\frac {(-1)^{n}}{2^{k+1}}}+{\frac {2\cos {\frac {2\pi n}{3}}}{3^{k+1}}}+{\frac {2\cos {\frac {\pi n}{2}}}{4^{k+1}}}+\cdots \right]}$

Growth rate

In little-o notation, the divisor function satisfies the inequality:^[14][15]

${\displaystyle {\mbox{for all }}\varepsilon >0,\quad d(n)=o(n^{\varepsilon }).}$

More precisely, Severin Wigert showed that:^[15]

${\displaystyle \limsup _{n\to \infty }{\frac {\log d(n)}{\log n/\log \log n}}=\log 2.}$

On the other hand, since there are infinitely many prime numbers,^[15]

${\displaystyle \liminf _{n\to \infty }d(n)=2.}$

In Big-O notation, Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet showed that the average order of the divisor function satisfies the following inequality:^[16][17]

${\displaystyle {\mbox{for all }}x\geq 1,\sum _{n\leq x}d(n)=x\log x+(2\gamma -1)x+O({\sqrt {x}}),}$

where ${\displaystyle \gamma }$ is Euler's gamma constant. Improving the bound ${\displaystyle O({\sqrt {x}})}$ in this formula is known as Dirichlet's divisor problem.

The behaviour of the sigma function is irregular. The asymptotic growth rate of the sigma function can be expressed by: ^[18]

${\displaystyle \limsup _{n\rightarrow \infty }{\frac {\sigma (n)}{n\,\log \log n}}=e^{\gamma },}$

where lim sup is the limit superior. This result is Grönwall's theorem, published in 1913 (Grönwall 1913). His proof uses Mertens' third theorem, which says that:

${\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }{\frac {1}{\log n}}\prod _{p\leq n}{\frac {p}{p-1}}=e^{\gamma },}$

where p denotes a prime.

In 1915, Ramanujan proved that under the assumption of the Riemann hypothesis, Robin's inequality

${\displaystyle \ \sigma (n)<e^{\gamma }n\log \log n}$ (where γ is the Euler–Mascheroni constant)

holds for all sufficiently large n (Ramanujan 1997). The largest known value that violates the inequality is n=5040. In 1984, Guy Robin proved that the inequality is true for all n > 5040 if and only if the Riemann hypothesis is true (Robin 1984). This is Robin's theorem and the inequality became known after him. Robin furthermore showed that if the Riemann hypothesis is false then there are an infinite number of values of n that violate the inequality, and it is known that the smallest such n > 5040 must be superabundant (Akbary & Friggstad 2009). It has been shown that the inequality holds for large odd and square-free integers, and that the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the inequality just for n divisible by the fifth power of a prime (Choie et al. 2007).

Robin also proved, unconditionally, that the inequality:

${\displaystyle \ \sigma (n)<e^{\gamma }n\log \log n+{\frac {0.6483\ n}{\log \log n}}}$

holds for all n ≥ 3.

A related bound was given by Jeffrey Lagarias in 2002, who proved that the Riemann hypothesis is equivalent to the statement that:

${\displaystyle \sigma (n)<H_{n}+e^{H_{n}}\log(H_{n})}$

for every natural number n > 1, where ${\displaystyle H_{n}}$ is the nth harmonic number, (Lagarias 2002).

See also

• Divisor sum convolutions, lists a few identities involving the divisor functions
• Euler's totient function, Euler's phi function
• Refactorable number
• Table of divisors
• Unitary divisor

Notes

1. Long (1972, p. 46)
2. Pettofrezzo & Byrkit (1970, p. 63)
3. Pettofrezzo & Byrkit (1970, p. 58)
4. Ramanujan, S. (1915), "Highly Composite Numbers", Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, s2-14 (1): 347–409, doi:10.1112/plms/s2_14.1.347; see section 47, pp. 405–406, reproduced in Collected Papers of Srinivasa Ramanujan, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015, pp. 124–125
5. Hardy & Wright (2008), pp. 310 f, §16.7.
6. Euler, Leonhard; Bell, Jordan (2004). "An observation on the sums of divisors". arXiv:math/0411587.
7. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/euler-works/175/, Découverte d'une loi tout extraordinaire des nombres par rapport à la somme de leurs diviseurs
8. https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/euler-works/542/, De mirabilis proprietatibus numerorum pentagonalium
9. Gioia & Vaidya (1967).
10. Hardy & Wright (2008), pp. 326–328, §17.5.
11. Hardy & Wright (2008), pp. 334–337, §17.8.
12. Hardy & Wright (2008), pp. 338–341, §17.10.
13. E. Krätzel (1981). Zahlentheorie. Berlin: VEB Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften. p. 130. (German)
14. Apostol (1976), p. 296.
15. Hardy & Wright (2008), pp. 342–347, §18.1.
16. Apostol (1976), Theorem 3.3.
17. Hardy & Wright (2008), pp. 347–350, §18.2.
18. Hardy & Wright (2008), pp. 469–471, §22.9.

References

• Akbary, Amir; Friggstad, Zachary (2009), "Superabundant numbers and the Riemann hypothesis" (PDF), American Mathematical Monthly, 116 (3): 273–275, doi:10.4169/193009709X470128, archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-04-11.
• Apostol, Tom M. (1976), Introduction to analytic number theory, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, New York-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-0-387-90163-3, MR 0434929, Zbl 0335.10001
• Bach, Eric; Shallit, Jeffrey, Algorithmic Number Theory, volume 1, 1996, MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-02405-5, see page 234 in section 8.8.
• Caveney, Geoffrey; Nicolas, Jean-Louis; Sondow, Jonathan (2011), "Robin's theorem, primes, and a new elementary reformulation of the Riemann Hypothesis" (PDF), INTEGERS: The Electronic Journal of Combinatorial Number Theory, 11: A33, arXiv:1110.5078, Bibcode:2011arXiv1110.5078C
• Choie, YoungJu; Lichiardopol, Nicolas; Moree, Pieter; Solé, Patrick (2007), "On Robin's criterion for the Riemann hypothesis", Journal de théorie des nombres de Bordeaux, 19 (2): 357–372, arXiv:math.NT/0604314, doi:10.5802/jtnb.591, ISSN 1246-7405, MR 2394891, S2CID 3207238, Zbl 1163.11059
• Gioia, A. A.; Vaidya, A. M. (1967), "Amicable numbers with opposite parity", The American Mathematical Monthly, 74 (8): 969–973, doi:10.2307/2315280, JSTOR 2315280, MR 0220659
• Grönwall, Thomas Hakon (1913), "Some asymptotic expressions in the theory of numbers", Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 14: 113–122, doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1913-1500940-6
• Hardy, G. H.; Wright, E. M. (2008) [1938], An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, Revised by D. R. Heath-Brown and J. H. Silverman. Foreword by Andrew Wiles. (6th ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, ISBN 978-0-19-921986-5, MR 2445243, Zbl 1159.11001
• Ivić, Aleksandar (1985), The Riemann zeta-function. The theory of the Riemann zeta-function with applications, A Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York etc.: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 385–440, ISBN 0-471-80634-X, Zbl 0556.10026
• Lagarias, Jeffrey C. (2002), "An elementary problem equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis", The American Mathematical Monthly, 109 (6): 534–543, arXiv:math/0008177, doi:10.2307/2695443, ISSN 0002-9890, JSTOR 2695443, MR 1908008, S2CID 15884740
• Long, Calvin T. (1972), Elementary Introduction to Number Theory (2nd ed.), Lexington: D. C. Heath and Company, LCCN 77171950
• Pettofrezzo, Anthony J.; Byrkit, Donald R. (1970), Elements of Number Theory, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, LCCN 77081766
• Ramanujan, Srinivasa (1997), "Highly composite numbers, annotated by Jean-Louis Nicolas and Guy Robin", The Ramanujan Journal, 1 (2): 119–153, doi:10.1023/A:1009764017495, ISSN 1382-4090, MR 1606180, S2CID 115619659
• Robin, Guy (1984), "Grandes valeurs de la fonction somme des diviseurs et hypothèse de Riemann", Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, Neuvième Série, 63 (2): 187–213, ISSN 0021-7824, MR 0774171
• Williams, Kenneth S. (2011), Number theory in the spirit of Liouville, London Mathematical Society Student Texts, vol. 76, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ISBN 978-0-521-17562-3, Zbl 1227.11002

External links

• Weisstein, Eric W. "Divisor Function". MathWorld.
• Weisstein, Eric W. "Robin's Theorem". MathWorld.
• Elementary Evaluation of Certain Convolution Sums Involving Divisor Functions PDF of a paper by Huard, Ou, Spearman, and Williams. Contains elementary (i.e. not relying on the theory of modular forms) proofs of divisor sum convolutions, formulas for the number of ways of representing a number as a sum of triangular numbers, and related results.