Much like the Bostock v. Clayton County decision, the Equality Act broadly defines sex discrimination to include sexual orientation and gender identity, adding "pregnancy, childbirth, or a related medical condition of an individual, as well as because of sex-based stereotypes". The intended purpose of the act is to legally protect individuals from discrimination based on such.[1]
While various similar bills have been proposed since the 1970s, the modern version of the Equality Act was first proposed in the 114th United States Congress. During the 116th Congress, it passed the United States House of Representatives on May 17, 2019, in a bipartisan 236–173 vote.[3][4] However, the United States Senate did not act upon the bill after receiving it; even if they had, then-President Donald Trump signaled that he would have vetoed it.[5] On February 18, 2021, the act was reintroduced in the 117th Congress. The House passed the act by a vote of 224 to 206 on February 25, 2021, with support from three Republicans. The bill then moved on to the Senate for consideration, but did not overcome a filibuster, and did not advance further.[6]
As of 2020, 29 states had not outlawed anti-LGBT discrimination, with members of the LGBT community being given little protection at a national level and two-thirds of LGBT Americans in the United States reported facing or having experienced discrimination in their personal lives.[7][8] The Equality Act seeks to legally protect individuals from such discrimination, applying existing state anti-LGBT discrimination laws nationwide.[2]
The Equality Act seeks to incorporate protections against LGBT discrimination into the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, it prohibits discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, and intersex status in a wide variety of areas including public accommodations and facilities, education, federally funded programs, employment, housing, credit, and jury service.[1][2]
It also seeks to expand existing civil rights protections for people of color,[9] women,[10] and other minority groups by updating the definition of public accommodations to include places or establishments that provide:[1][2]
Exhibition, entertainment, recreation, exercise, amusement, public gathering, or public display
Goods, services, or programs
Transportation services
According to the text of the act as introduced in the 117th Congress, discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity by governments violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, saying:
Discrimination by State and local governments on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity in employment, housing, and public accommodations, and in programs and activities receiving Federal financial assistance, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. In many circumstances, such discrimination also violates other constitutional rights such as those of liberty and privacy under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.[1]
History
Early history (1970s–1990s)
The original Equality Act was developed by U.S. Representatives Bella Abzug (D-NY) and Ed Koch (D-NY) in 1974. The Equality Act of 1974 (H.R. 14752 of the 93rd Congress) sought to amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, and marital status in federally assisted programs, housing sales, rentals, financing, and brokerage services. The bill authorized civil actions by the Attorney General of the United States in cases of discrimination on account of sex, sexual orientation, or marital status in public facilities and public education. On June 27, 1974, H.R. 14752 was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary, but did not proceed to a vote in the full United States House of Representatives.[11]
From 1994, the more narrow Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) was introduced, but faced opposition over whether transgender Americans would be protected. An expanded version of ENDA which included both sexual orientation and changed sex to gender identity in its protections passed the United States Senate in 2013, but did not advance in the House.[12]
On June 15, 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination against gay and transgender people in employment. LGBTQ rights advocates welcomed the ruling and reaffirmed support for passage of the Equality Act, stating that the ruling only covered employment, and in many states LGBTQ people still lack non-discrimination protections in housing, public accommodations, public education, federal funding, credit, and jury service which would be covered under the Equality Act.[13][14][15] The ruling said that the Civil Rights Act protects "gay and transgender" people in matters of employment but left the terms undefined.[16][17]
A Reuters/Ipsos poll conducted in May/June 2019 found that most Americans do not know that LGBT people lack federal protections. Only one-third of respondents knew that such protections do not exist on the basis of transgender identity, and only one-quarter knew that they do not exist on the basis of lesbian, gay, and bisexual identity.[18][19]
A nationwide and state-by-state poll on the issue conducted throughout 2017 by the Public Religion Research Institute as part of its annual American Values Atlas survey said that 70% of Americans, including a majority in every state, supported laws that would protect LGBTQ people against discrimination, while 23% opposed such laws, and 8% had no opinion.[20][21][22] A 2020 PRRI poll said 83% of Americans would favor such anti-discrimination laws, and specifically regarding discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations. 16% of Americans oppose such laws.[23][24] Support for such anti-discrimination laws was at 94% for Democrats, 85% for independents, and 68% for Republicans.[25] According to a 2021 PRRI survey, about 22% of Americans support religious exemptions for business owners pertaining to anti-discrimination law based on sexual orientation, while about 76% of Americans oppose such exemptions.[26]
A poll conducted by Quinnipiac University in April 2019 found that 92% of American voters believed that employers should not be allowed to fire someone based on their sexual orientation or sexual identity, while only 6% believed that employers should be allowed to do so. A wide consensus on this question was found among both Democratic and Republican voters, as well as Independents, although Democratic voters were slightly more likely to believe that this kind of discrimination should be illegal, with only 1% of them believing that employers should be allowed to fire someone based on their sexual orientation or sexual identity.[27]
Support and opposition
Support
The Equality Act is supported by more than 547 national, state and local organizations.[28][29][30][31] These different organizations are related to human rights, social justice and religious groups. All of these organizations support the Equality Act.
Organizations related to human rights and social justice
Calling for the bill's passage in 2016, civil rights icon John Lewis said, "This legislation is what justice requires. This legislation is what justice demands. And like the Supreme Court's recent decision, it is long overdue ... We are a society committed to equal justice under the law. ... We have fought too hard and too long against discrimination based on race and color not to stand up against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity."[70]
Opposition
Numerous political pundits and politicians have stated their opposition to the Equality Act at various times. Notable among these was Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), which caused a brief political feud between her and Rep. Marie Newman (D-IL).[71][72][73] Greene had said in a speech that the proposed act "destroys God's creation, ... completely annihilates women's rights and religious freedoms",[74][75] and "puts trans rights above women's rights".[76]
Fox News anchor, Tucker Carlson, called the Equality Act a "terrifying agenda that eliminates women". Candace Owens appeared on Carlson's Fox Newstalk show in the same segment and said about the Equality Act that Democrats "don't know what equality is".[77]
Some single-issue women's groups have opposed the provision of the bill which defines sex to include gender identity. Some groups say that the provision endangers the "sex-based rights" of women and girls, including women's sports and women-only spaces such as locker rooms, prisons, and shelters.[78][79] Among these groups has been the Women's Human Rights Campaign USA (WHRC USA),[80] the Women's Liberation Front (WoLF),[81] Feminists in Struggle (FiST),[82] Standing for Women,[83] and Save Women's Sports.[84] They oppose the bill unless it is amended to protect sex and not gender identity. Both WHRC USA and FIST have proposed amendments to the act[82][85] and not recognize gender identity. Some organization that oppose the Equality Act are funded by fundamentalist anti-LGBT hate groups (as designated by the SPLC) such as the Alliance Defending Freedom. The organization has shifted their messaging to sound more secular and feminist, although this is disputed by its supporters having anti-LGBT views.[86][87][88]
Georgia State University criminology professor Callie H. Burt published a paper in the June 2020 issue of Feminist Criminology in which she examined the potential effects of the Equality Act on women's rights. While saying the act is "laudable in its aims", Burt lamented the lack of scrutiny and discussion by Democratic representatives in Congress into the real consequences the act's "imprecise language" would bring to women: "The result is the erosion of females' provisions, which include sex-separated spaces (e.g., prisons, locker rooms, shelters), opportunities and competitions (e.g., awards, scholarships, sports), and events (e.g., meetings, groups, festivals)". She also said, "I submit that the bill, in current form, fails to strike a balance between the rights, needs, and interests of two marginalized (and overlapping) groups—trans people and females—and instead prioritizes the demands of trans people over the hard-won rights of female people."[79]
The Economist, a British newspaper, stated in October 2020 that the original draft of the act endangers the rights of women in areas such as sports, where they would be at a physical disadvantage having to compete against trans women. When it comes to biological-sex segregated spaces, such as public bathrooms and prisons, the newspaper states that "parts of the bill appear to put the needs of transgender people above those of women. This is because the act redefines 'sex' in Title IX and other amendments of the Civil Rights Act to include 'gender identity; rather than making transgenderism a protected category of its own. Its definition of 'gender identity' is fuzzy and appears to downplay the reality of sex."[89]
Law professor Douglas Laycock told NPR that the law is "less necessary" now, after the Bostock decision, and that the bill "protects the rights of one side, but attempts to destroy the rights of the other side."[90]
Some religious leaders oppose the bill for various reasons, saying for example that it would infringe on religious liberty.[91][92]
On May 7, 2019, a coalition of Christian organizations sent a letter to the House of Representatives stating their opposition to the Equality Act. In the letter, the groups expressed that the act "undermines religious freedom, and threatens charitable nonprofits and the people they serve, regulates free speech, hinders quality health care, and endangers the privacy and safety of women and girls." In addition to four committee chairs of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, signers included leaders from the Christian Legal Society, the Center for Law and Religious Freedom, the Center for Public Justice, the National Association of Evangelicals, the Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention, the Lutheran Center for Religious Liberty (affiliated with the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod), the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities, and the Institutional Religious Freedom Alliance.[94]
Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, said that "The Equality Act is the most comprehensive assault on religious liberty, the right to life, and privacy rights ever packaged into one bill." Donohue also stated his concern that "Catholic hospitals would no longer be allowed to govern as Catholic facilities, threatening healthcare for everyone, especially the poor."[95]
On May 16, 2019, Sister Carol Keehan, president of the Catholic Health Association sent a letter to lawmakers in the House expressing concern that the act, as written, would roll back religious liberty protections. "Federal law has long recognized that certain services can present conflict for some faith-based health care providers with religious or moral objections to providing those services, and protected them from having to do so. We are concerned that the Equality Act omits and could erode or reduce those protections." The legislation, she said, "lacks conscience protection language and precludes application of RFRA (Religious Freedom Restoration Act)."[96]
On May 13, 2019, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints released a statement that read in part, "The Equality Act now before Congress is not balanced and does not meet the standard of fairness for all. While providing extremely broad protections for LGBT rights, the Equality Act provides no protections for religious freedom".[92][98] In 2021, the LDS Church endorsed a competing bill, the Fairness for All Act. The competing bill would add faith-based exemptions to anti-discrimination law. Other than the LDS Church, its supporters have included the Seventh-day Adventist Church and the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities.[99]
The Heritage Foundation has argued that the act would adversely affect five groups of people (employers and workers; medical professionals; parents and children; non-profit organizations and their volunteers; and women), and they describe specific harms the Foundation believes each group would experience from the act's passage.[100]
Transgender rights and the Equality Act
Much of the concern surrounding the Equality Act stems from the protections that would be guaranteed for transgender individuals in sports and also in access to sex-segregated spaces. It is argued that these protections would endanger women in sex-segregated spaces such as bathrooms and prisons. However, the National Taskforce to End Sexual and Domestic Violence and over 250 anti-sexual assault organizations have condemned opponents' attempts to portray transgender people as sexual predators and contends it is untrue that protections for transgender people endanger women's safety and privacy.[101]The Taskforce's joint letter was signed by over 250 survivor organizations in full support of full and equal access for the transgender community, including in restrooms and locker rooms.[102] The letter notes the [21] states and 200+ municipalities that have protected transgender people's access to facilities have not seen an increase in sexual violence and public safety incidents due to nondiscrimination laws. The letter also notes that anti-transgender initiatives put transgender people at further risk of assault.[103]
Religious organizations that have expressed their support for the act claim that this act would protect transgender children and people; however, this has been overshadowed by the strong opposition by other religious groups and organizations.
Religious organizations and registered charities that have given public support to the act include Advocates for Youth, and various Catholic leaders and lobbying organizations such as Father James Martin S.J.,[104]Network,[105] and DignityUSA.[106] Catholic theologian and nun Joan Chittister released a statement saying that the Equality Act "must be passed, must be extended, and must be lived if religion itself is to be true".[107] The Interfaith Alliance endorsed the Equality Act as part of "Faith for Equality", a coalition which provided a letter signed by over 17,000 religious Americans to Senator Chris Coons in support of the act.[108][109]
Edith Guffey, a UCC minister and mother of a transgender, non-binary child testified to Congress in support of the Equality Act, saying "We should all be able to agree on this one thing, the law should treat all our children, God's children, equally. All of our children deserve to be treated with and respect. Every single one of us would go to the mat for our children. None of us wants them to be turned away or discriminated against for any reason."[110][111]
At a 2021 Senate hearing for the Equality Act, 16-year-old Stella Keating became the first transgender teenager to testify before Congress saying, "Right now, I could be denied medical care or be evicted for simply being transgender in many states. ... What if I'm offered a dream job in a state where I can be discriminated against? Even if my employer is supportive, I still have to live somewhere. Eat in restaurants. Have a doctor", she added. "This is the United States of America. The country that I love. Every young person ... regardless of who they are or who they love, should be able to be excited about their future."[112]
The Trump Administration opposed the Equality Act. In August 2019, the White House issued a statement, "The Trump Administration absolutely opposes discrimination of any kind and supports the equal treatment of all; however, the House-passed bill in its current form is filled with poison pills that threaten to undermine parental and conscience rights."[115]
President Biden and Vice President Harris are vocal defenders of the Equality Act, issuing a statement from the White House, "I applaud Congressman David Cicilline and the entire Congressional Equality Caucus for introducing the Equality Act in the House of Representatives yesterday, and I urge Congress to swiftly pass this historic legislation. Every person should be treated with dignity and respect, and this bill represents a critical step toward ensuring that America lives up to our foundational values of equality and freedom for all."[116][23]
In March 2022 President Biden called for the passage of the Equality Act during the State Of The Union.[117] On the March 2022 Trans Day of Visibility, the Biden administration announced that it was fighting for the passage of the Equality Act to advance the civil rights of trans Americans.[118]
Legislative activity
114th Congress
On July 23, 2015, Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) introduced H.R. 3185, the Equality Act of 2015, in the United States House of Representatives.[119] The bill was supported by President Barack Obama.[113] In January 2016, Rep. Bob Dold (R-IL) became the first Republican Representative to co-sponsor the bill.[120] Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) became the second Republican to co-sponsor the bill in September 2016. Jenniffer González (R-PR) also co-sponsored the bill.[121]
On July 23, 2015, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced S. 1858, the Equality Act of 2015, in the United States Senate. In January 2016, Sen. Mark Kirk (R-IL) became the first and only Republican Senator to co-sponsor the bill. All Democrats and Independents cosponsored the bill with the exception of Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND), Joe Donnelly (D-IN), Joe Manchin (D-WV) and Jon Tester (D-MT).
115th Congress
On May 2, 2017, Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) introduced H.R. 2282, the Equality Act of 2017, in the United States House of Representatives. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL) was the only Republican to co-sponsor the bill from the outset, with Rep.
Scott Taylor (R-VA) becoming the second Republican to co-sponsor the bill on May 26, 2017.
On May 2, 2017, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced S. 1006, the Equality Act of 2017, in the United States Senate. All Democrats and Independents cosponsored the bill with the exceptions of Joe Donnelly (D-IN) and Joe Manchin (D-WV).
116th Congress
On March 13, 2019, Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) introduced H.R. 5, the Equality Act of 2019, in the United States House of Representatives. The bill is sponsored by 237 Democrats and 3 Republicans. On May 1, 2019, the bill passed the House Judiciary Committee by a vote of 22–10, with all Democratic members of the committee voting in favor and all Republican members against.[122] A vote by the full House was held on May 17, 2019; the vote carried with 236 votes for and 173 against. Eight Republicans voted in favor of the bill and no Democrats opposed it.[3][123]
On March 13, 2019, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced S. 788, the Equality Act of 2019, in the United States Senate. The bill was sponsored by 43 Democrats, 2 Independents, and 1 Republican.
117th Congress
On February 18, 2021, H.R. 5 was reintroduced to the House of Representatives. It was passed by the House for the second time on February 25, 2021, and now moves on to the Senate.[124] Notable speeches were heard by, among others, Nancy Pelosi, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Marie Newman.[125][23][126] Among Republican Representatives, only Tom Reed, John Katko, and Brian Fitzpatrick voted in favor; fewer than in the previous Congress. Mario Díaz-Balart and Elise Stefanik previously voted in favor but now voted against.
On February 23, 2021, a companion bill, S. 393, was introduced in the Senate. It was referred to the Judiciary Committee, where a hearing was held on March 17, 2021.[127] It had, as of February 26, 2021, 48 co-sponsors.[128] However, it was unable to gain enough support among Republicans to meet the 60-vote threshold to overcome a filibuster, and did not advance further.[6]
^Swift, Taylor (June 1, 2019). "Taylor Swift on Instagram". Instagram. Archived from the original on December 24, 2021. Retrieved June 17, 2019. I've decided to kick off Pride Month by writing a letter to one of my senators to explain how strongly I feel that the Equality Act should be passed
Municipio de Mill Municipio Municipio de MillUbicación en el condado de Baxter en Arkansas Ubicación de Arkansas en EE. UU.Coordenadas 36°23′33″N 92°13′44″O / 36.3925, -92.2289Entidad Municipio • País Estados Unidos • Estado Arkansas • Condado BaxterSuperficie • Total 132.5 km² • Tierra 109.1 km² • Agua (17.66%) 23.39 km²Altitud • Media 189 m s. n. m.Población (2010) ...
Nota: Para União Nacional, veja União Nacional (desambiguação). Bandeira da coalizão União Nacional União Nacional (em hebraico: האיחוד הלאומי, pronúncia: Ha-Ihud Ha-Leumi) foi uma coalizão política entre partidos de direita e extrema-direita[1][2] de Israel que competiu nas eleições do país entre 1999 e 2009.[3][4] A composição do bloco partidário mudou várias vezes ao longo dos anos. Em sua formação derradeira antes da eleição de 2013, a aliança era c...
Wilayah tata kota di Singapura West Region Singapura adalah satu dari lima region di negara-kota tersebut. Terdiri dari 25.500 hektare daratan,[1] region ini merupakan yang terbesar dari kelima region di Singapura. West Region meliputi dua belas wilayah tata kota dan memiliki populasi sedikitnya 1 juta jiwa. Sesuai namanya, region ini terletak di barat Singapura. Region ini juga meliputi Western Water Catchment dan Western Islands. Wilayah tata kota 12 wilayah tata kota tersebut melip...
1955 Donald Duck cartoon Up a TreeTitle cardDirected byJack HannahStory byDick Kinney Milt SchafferProduced byWalt DisneyStarringClarence NashDessie FlynnJimmy MacDonaldMusic byOliver WallaceAnimation byBob Carlson Al Coe Volus Jones Bill Justice Dan MacManus (effects)Layouts byYale GraceyBackgrounds byClaude CoatsColor processTechnicolorProductioncompanyWalt Disney ProductionsDistributed byRKO Radio PicturesRelease date September 23, 1955 (1955-09-23) (USA)[1]Running t...
2004 live album by Prince and The New Power GenerationC-NoteLive album by Prince and The New Power GenerationReleasedMarch 29, 2004RecordedOctober- November, 2002GenreJazzfunkinstrumentalLength34:03LabelNPGProducerPrincePrince chronology Xpectation(2003) C-Note(2004) N·E·W·S(2003) C-Note is a live album by Prince and The New Power Generation released in 2004 (though all five tracks had been released as separate mp3 files earlier in 2003). Its genre is jazz, with five tracks taken f...
Este artigo não cita fontes confiáveis. Ajude a inserir referências. Conteúdo não verificável pode ser removido.—Encontre fontes: ABW • CAPES • Google (N • L • A) (Julho de 2020) Coordenadas: 45°14'20 N, 81°36'51 O Parque Nacional Península Bruce O Parque Nacional Península Bruce localiza-se na província canadense de Ontário. Possui uma abundante vida selvagem, especialmente de ursos negros, além de proporcionar in...
2012 single by MatisyahuHappy HanukkahSingle by MatisyahuReleasedNovember 20, 2012Recorded2012GenreReggaeLabelFallen Sparks RecordsProducer(s)KojakMatisyahu singles chronology Live Like a Warrior (2012) Happy Hanukkah (2012) Music videoHappy Hanukkah on YouTube Happy Hanukkah is a song by Jewish American reggae artist Matisyahu released on November 20, 2012 on Fallen Sparks Records. Released as a charity song, all proceeds from the date of release until end of Hanukkah celebrations on Decembe...
Esta página cita fontes, mas que não cobrem todo o conteúdo. Ajude a inserir referências. Conteúdo não verificável pode ser removido.—Encontre fontes: ABW • CAPES • Google (N • L • A) (Julho de 2020) Cidade Fortificada de Bacu com o Palácio dos xás de Xirvão e a Torre da Donzela ★ Património Mundial da UNESCO Cidade Fortificada de BacuPortões da Cidade Fortificada Critérios IV Referência 958 en fr es País ...
Miltona Ciudad MiltonaUbicación en el condado de Douglas en Minnesota Ubicación de Minnesota en EE. UU.Coordenadas 46°02′39″N 95°17′29″O / 46.04413, -95.29142Entidad Ciudad • País Estados Unidos • Estado Minnesota • Condado DouglasSuperficie • Total 1.74 km² • Tierra 1.74 km² • Agua (0%) 0 km²Altitud • Media 429 m s. n. m.Población (2010) • Total 424 hab....
Madagascar nos Jogos Olímpicos de Verão de 2000 Comitê Olímpico Nacional Código do COI MAD Nome Comité Olympique Malgache Jogos Olímpicos de Verão de 2000 Sede Sydney, Austrália Medalhas Pos.n/d 0 0 0 0 Participações nos Jogos Olímpicos Verão 1964 • 1968 • 1972 • 1976 • 1980 • 1984 • 1988 • 1992 • 1996 • 2000 • 2004 • 2008 • 2012 • 2016 • 2020 Inverno 2006 • 2010–2014 • 2018 • 2022 Madagascar participou dos Jogos Olímpicos de Verão ...
New HampshireNegara bagian BenderaLambangPeta Amerika Serikat dengan ditandaiNegaraAmerika SerikatSebelum menjadi negara bagianProvince of New HampshireBergabung ke Serikat21 Juni 1788 (9)Kota terbesarManchesterPemerintahan • GubernurChris Sununu (R) • Wakil GubernurTidak ada[1] • Majelis tinggi{{{Upperhouse}}} • Majelis rendah{{{Lowerhouse}}}Senator ASJudd Gregg (R)Jeanne Shaheen (D)Delegasi DPR AS1: Carol Shea-Porter (D) 2: Paul Hodes ...
Final da Copa do Mundo de Ginástica Artística de 1990 Dados Sede Bruxelas Nação vencedora União Soviética ← Pequim 1986 Sabae 1998 → A oitava Final da Copa do Mundo de Ginástica Artística foi realizada na cidade de Bruxelas, na Bélgica, em 1990 e contou com as provas do individual geral masculino e feminino. Medalhistas Evento Ouro Prata Bronze Masculino Individual geral URS Valeri Belenki URS Vitaly Scherbo CHN Li Jing Feminino Individual geral URS Tatian...
Mountain of the Bernese AlpsWildi FrauThe Wildi Frau (centre left) and the Ufem Stock (centre right)Highest pointElevation3,274 m (10,741 ft)Prominence141 m (463 ft)[1]Parent peakBlüemlisalpCoordinates46°30′15″N 7°46′48″E / 46.50417°N 7.78000°E / 46.50417; 7.78000GeographyWildi FrauLocation in Switzerland LocationBern, SwitzerlandParent rangeBernese Alps The Wildi Frau is a mountain of the Bernese Alps, overlooking the Hoht...
Arena football team Mobile WizardsEstablished 2001Folded 2002Played in Mobile Civic Center in Mobile, Alabama League/conference affiliationsaf2 (2002) National Conference (2002) South Division (2002) Current uniformTeam colorsDeep purple, teal, white PersonnelTeam history Mobile Wizards (2002) ChampionshipsLeague championships (0)Conference championships (0)Division championships (0)Home arena(s) Mobile Civic Center (2002) The Mobile Wizards were an af2 arena football team ...
NetherlandsFIBA ranking6Joined FIBA1946FIBA zoneFIBA EuropeNational federationNBBOlympic GamesAppearances1World CupAppearances7Medals Silver : 2017, 2018Europe CupAppearances5Medals Bronze : 2016 Home Away Medal record Representing Netherlands Men's 3x3 basketball World Cup 2017 Nantes Team 2018 Bocaue Team Europe Cup 2016 Bucharest The Netherlands men's national 3x3 team is the 3x3 basketball team representing Netherlands in international men's competitions, organized and run...
Yemeni Emirati actress and singer Balqees Fathi بلقيس فتحيBalqees in 2019BornBalqees Ahmed Fathi (1984-10-20) October 20, 1984 (age 39)Abu Dhabi, United Arab EmiratesOccupationsSingeractressYears active2011–presentMusical careerGenres Arabic pop world opera[1] pop LabelsRotana (2013–2017) Musical artist Balqees Ahmed Fathi (Arabic: بلقيس أحمد فتحي; born October 20, 1984), widely known by the mononym Balqees (بلقيس), is a Yemeni-Emirati singer a...
2007 video game This article is about the 2007 video game. For the 1986 video game, see Portal (1986 video game). For the series, see Portal (series). 2007 video gamePortalDeveloper(s)Valve[a]Publisher(s)ValveDesigner(s)Kim SwiftWriter(s)Erik WolpawChet FaliszekComposer(s)Kelly BaileyMike MoraskySeriesPortalEngineSourcePlatform(s)WindowsPlayStation 3Xbox 360Mac OS XLinuxAndroidNintendo SwitchRelease October 10, 2007 Windows, Xbox 360 NA: October 10, 2007EU: October 18, 2007AU: October...
Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Daerah Kabupaten SitubondoDewan Perwakilan RakyatKabupaten Situbondo2019-2024JenisJenisUnikameral Jangka waktu5 tahunSejarahSesi baru dimulai21 Agustus 2019PimpinanKetuaEdy Wahyudi, S.E. (PKB) sejak 17 September 2019 Wakil Ketua IH. Abdur Rahman, S.H., M.H. (PPP) sejak 17 September 2019 Wakil Ketua IIDjaenur Ridoh (Gerindra) sejak 17 September 2019 Wakil Ketua IIIHeroe Soegihartono, S.H. (Golkar) sejak 17 September 2019 KomposisiAnggota45Partai & ku...