2020 California Democratic presidential primary

2020 California Democratic presidential primary

← 2016 March 3, 2020 2024 →
← AR
CO →

494 delegates (415 pledged, 79 unpledged)
to the Democratic National Convention
The number of pledged delegates won is determined by the popular vote
 
Candidate Bernie Sanders Joe Biden
Home state Vermont Delaware
Delegate count 225 172
Popular vote 2,080,846 1,613,854
Percentage 35.97% 27.90%

 
Candidate Elizabeth Warren Michael Bloomberg
Home state Massachusetts New York
Delegate count 11 7
Popular vote 762,555 701,803
Percentage 13.18% 12.13%

The 2020 California Democratic presidential primary took place on March 3, 2020, as one of 15 contests scheduled on Super Tuesday in the Democratic Party primaries for the 2020 presidential election, following the South Carolina primary the weekend before. The California primary formed an unusual part of Super Tuesday as it had historically departed from its typical June date. It was a semi-closed primary, with the state awarding 494 delegates towards the 2020 Democratic National Convention, of which 415 were pledged delegates allocated on the basis of the results of the primary.

Senator Bernie Sanders won the highly desired primary, which bore the most delegates of the entire primary cycle by far, improving on his polling average by 3% and winning 36% of the vote and 225 delegates.[1] Former vice president Joe Biden, however, aided by among others the endorsements of Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar, also had a much stronger second-place finish than expected and took 28% of the vote and 172 delegates, matching his successful Super Tuesday momentum and minimizing his delegate deficit, which was also leveled by his other wins on that day.[2] Ultimately, his California loss did not hinder Biden from becoming the new frontrunner for the Democratic nomination. Elizabeth Warren and Michael Bloomberg did not surpass the 15% threshold and only got 11 and 7 delegates in a few districts, respectively.

Procedure

California was one of 14 states and one territory that held its primaries on March 3, 2020, also known as "Super Tuesday",[3] having joined other states on the date after the signing of the Prime Time Primary Act by Governor Jerry Brown on September 27, 2017, moving the primary from its traditional June date in an effort to increase the influence of the delegate-rich state in the nomination process.[4]

Candidates were allowed to obtain ballot access in a number of ways. They needed to have.:

  • "...qualified for funding under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974 (52 U.S.C. Sec. 30101, et seq.)
  • appeared as a candidate in a national presidential debate hosted by a political party qualified to participate in a primary election, with at least two participating candidates, and publicly available for viewing by voters in more than one state during the current presidential election cycle. A “political party qualified to participate in a primary election” means any political party qualified in California, a major or minor-ballot qualified political party in another state, or a national committee of a political party recognized by the Federal Election Commission
  • placed or qualified for placement on a presidential primary ballot or a caucus ballot of a major or minor ballot-qualified political party in at least one other state in the current presidential election cycle
  • candidate or qualified to be a candidate in a caucus of a major or minor ballot-qualified political party in at least one other state in the current presidential election cycle
  • has the following: current presidential campaign internet website or webpage hosted by the candidate or a qualified political party, and a written request submitted on the candidate's behalf by a party qualified to participate in the primary election to the Secretary of State requesting the candidate be placed on the presidential primary ballot."

If they did not have at least one of those qualifications, they needed to submit petitions of 500 signatures from each of the state's congressional districts obtained between November 4 and December 13, 2019. The official list of qualified candidates was released on December 6, 2019. Unqualified candidates were required to submit their petitions by this date.

Military and overseas mail-in ballots were sent out on January 3, 2020, and domestic mail-in ballots were requested and sent out from February 3 to February 25. Early voting centers opened for business on February 22 and continued until March 3. Election day voting took place throughout the state from 7 a.m. until 8 p.m. In the semi-closed primary, candidates had to meet a threshold of 15 percent at the congressional district or statewide level in order to be considered viable. The 415 pledged delegates to the 2020 Democratic National Convention were allocated proportionally on the basis of the results of the primary. Of these, between 4 and 7 were allocated to each of the state's 53 congressional districts, and another 54 were allocated to party leaders and elected officials (PLEO delegates), in addition to 90 at-large delegates.[5] The Super Tuesday primary as part of Stage I on the primary timetable received no bonus delegates, in order to disperse the primaries between more different date clusters and keep too many states from hoarding on the first shared date or on a March date in general.[6]

Following the primary, district-level delegates to the national convention were elected on June 7, 2020 (postponed from April 19 due to the COVID-19 pandemic) in the post-primary caucus. Should presidential candidates have been allocated more delegates based on the results of the primary than delegate candidates presented, then supplemental delegates would have been elected at caucuses on May 9, 2020. The national convention delegation meeting was subsequently held on June 28, 2020 (postponed from May 17) during the state convention, to vote on the 54 pledged PLEO and 90 at-large delegates for the Democratic National Convention. The delegation also included 79 unpledged PLEO delegates: 31 members of the Democratic National Committee, 47 members of Congress (both senators, including former candidate Kamala Harris, and 45 representatives, including former candidate Eric Swalwell), and the governor Gavin Newsom.[5]

Pledged national
convention
delegates[5]
Type Del. Type Del. Type Del. Type Del.
CD1 4 CD14 6 CD27 5 CD40 5
CD2 6 CD15 6 CD28 6 CD41 5
CD3 5 CD16 4 CD29 5 CD42 5
CD4 5 CD17 5 CD30 6 CD43 5
CD5 6 CD18 6 CD31 5 CD44 5
CD6 5 CD19 6 CD32 5 CD45 5
CD7 5 CD20 5 CD33 6 CD46 4
CD8 4 CD21 4 CD34 5 CD47 5
CD9 5 CD22 4 CD35 5 CD48 5
CD10 4 CD23 4 CD36 4 CD49 5
CD11 6 CD24 5 CD37 6 CD50 4
CD12 7 CD25 5 CD38 5 CD51 5
CD13 7 CD26 5 CD39 5 CD52 6
PLEO 54 At-large 90 CD53 6
Total pledged delegates 415

Candidates

The following candidates appear in the Certified List of Statewide Candidates:[7]

Running

Withdrawn

Polling

Polling aggregation
Source of poll aggregation Date
updated
Dates
polled
Bernie
Sanders
Joe
Biden
Elizabeth
Warren
Michael
Bloomberg
Tulsi
Gabbard
Other/
Undecided[c]
270 to Win[8] March 3, 2020 February 20 – March 1, 2020 33.0% 20.0% 14.4% 15.0% 1.2% 16.4%
RealClear Politics[9] March 3, 2020 February 28 – March 2, 2020 35.0% 23.0% 16.0% 14.0% 1.5% 10.5%[d]
FiveThirtyEight[10] March 3, 2020 until March 2, 2020[e] 31.2% 21.7% 14.9% 14.7% 0.7% 16.8%
Average 33.1% 21.6% 15.1% 14.6% 1.1% 14.5%
California primary results (March 3, 2020) 36.0% 27.9% 13.2% 12.1% 0.6% 10.2%
Polling from January 1 to March 3, 2020
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[f]
Margin
of error
Joe
Biden
Michael
Bloomberg
Pete
Buttigieg
Amy
Klobuchar
Bernie
Sanders
Tom
Steyer
Elizabeth
Warren
Andrew
Yang
Other Undecided
March 2, 2020 Klobuchar withdraws from the race.
Swayable[11] March 1–2, 2020 3,388 (LV) ± 2.0% 20.8% 19.3% 8.4% 3.3% 28.7% 4.0% 9.6% 6.0%[g]
Data for Progress[12] February 28 – March 2, 2020 516 (LV) ± 4.3% 25% 17% 5% 3% 32% 16% 1%[h]
AtlasIntel[13] February 24 – March 2, 2020 727 (LV) ± 4.0% 26% 15% 3% 1% 34% 15% 2%[i] 4%
March 1, 2020 Buttigieg withdraws from the race.
Point Blank Political[14] February 29 – March 1, 2020 1,220 (LV) ± 4.1% 22% 10% 6% 3% 34% 1% 14% 1%[j] 9%
Emerson College/Nexstar[15] February 29 – March 1, 2020 545 (LV) ± 4.1% 21% 11% 7% 5% 38% 2% 16% 1%[k]
February 29, 2020 South Carolina primary; Steyer withdraws from the race after close of polls.
YouGov/CBS News[16] February 27–29, 2020 1,411 (LV) ± 4.0% 19% 12% 9% 4% 31% 3% 18% 4%[l]
Suffolk University[17] February 26–29, 2020 500 (LV) ± 4.4% 14% 16% 7% 5% 35% 3% 12% 3%[m]
YouGov/Hoover
Institution
/Stanford University[18]
February 26–28, 2020 1,020 (LV) 19% 13% 9% 6% 28% 4% 18% 3%[n]
Point Blank Political[19] February 26–28, 2020 2,276 (LV) ± 2.9% 14% 12% 9% 3% 34% 3% 14% 1%[o] 10%
40%[p] 50% 11%
32%[q] 57% 11%
46%[r] 36% 16%
CNN/SSRS[20] February 22–26, 2020 488 (LV) ± 5.2% 13% 12% 7% 6% 35% 3% 14% 3%[s] 8%
February 25, 2020 Tenth Democratic primary debate
Point Blank Political[21] February 23–25, 2020 2,098 (LV) ± 3.0% 11% 11% 9% 4% 34% 3% 13% 2%[t] 13%
Berkeley IGS/LA Times[22] Feb 20–25, 2020 3,002 (LV) ± 2.0% 8% 12% 11% 6% 34% 2% 17% 1% 2%[u] 7%
February 22, 2020 Nevada caucuses
Change Research/KQED News[23] February 20–23, 2020 1,069 (LV) ± 3.4% 12% 6% 11% 5% 37% 3% 20% 4%[v] 3%[w]
University of Massachusetts Lowell[24] February 12–20, 2020 450 (LV) ± 6.7% 13% 12% 12% 7% 24% 2% 16% 7%[x] 6%
Monmouth University[25] February 16–19, 2020 408 (LV) ± 4.9% 17% 13% 9% 4% 24% 5% 10% 3%[y] 13%
36%[z] 44% 15%[aa] 5%
31%[ab] 48% 14%[ac] 6%
26%[ad] 51% 16%[ae] 7%
24%[af] 54% 16%[ag] 6%
Public Policy Institute of California[26] February 7–17, 2020 573 (LV) ± 5.7% 14% 12% 12% 5% 32% 3% 13% 2%[ah] 8%
SurveyUSA[27] February 13–16, 2020 520 (LV) ± 4.8% 15% 21% 12% 6% 25% 3% 9% 1%[ai] 9%
YouGov/USC[28] February 1–15, 2020 21% 8% 6% 3% 29% 2% 20% 2%[aj] 9%[ak]
February 11, 2020 New Hampshire primary; Yang withdraws from the race after close of polls.
Capitol Weekly[29] February 6–9, 2020 843 (LV) 8%[al] 8% 15% 7% 25% 4% 19% 5% 6%[am] 3%[an]
11% 13% 14% 5% 29% 3% 16% 4% 5%[ao] 1%[ap]
February 3, 2020 Iowa Caucuses
Change Research/KQED News[30] January 25–27, 2020 1,967 (LV) 15% 4% 8% 3% 30% 2% 16% 5% 4%[aq] 13%
Berkeley IGS/LA Times[31] January 15–21, 2020 2,895 (LV) ± 2.5% 15.0% 6.0% 7.2% 4.9% 26.3% 1.8% 19.6% 3.9% 3.6%[ar] 11.7%
SurveyUSA[32] January 14–16, 2020 565 (LV) ± 5.1% 30% 6% 8% 2% 20% 4% 20% 4% 2%[as] 4%
January 13, 2020 Booker withdraws from the race.
Public Policy Institute of California/Mercury News[33] January 3–12, 2020 530 (LV) ± 6.5% 24% 1% 6% 4% 27% 23% 3% 5%[at] 7%
Tulchin Research/USC Rossier/The Hill[34] January 3–10, 2020 1,121 (LV) 25% 7% 8% 2% 29% 3% 12% 5% 2%[au] 6%
Capitol Weekly[35] January 1–9, 2020 1,053 (LV) 20% 6% 11% 5% 24% 2% 21% 7% 3%[av]
Polling before 1 January 2020
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size[f]
Margin
of error
Joe
Biden
Cory
Booker
Pete
Buttigieg
Kamala
Harris
Beto
O'Rourke
Bernie
Sanders
Elizabeth
Warren
Andrew
Yang
Other Undecided
Change Research/KQED News[36] December 6–10, 2019 862 (LV) ± 3.3% 19% 3% 12% 26% 23% 4% 13%[aw]
CNN/SSRS[37] December 4–8, 2019 508 (LV) ± 5.2% 21% 3% 9% 20% 17% 6% 12%[ax] 11%
Capitol Weekly[38] December 3–7, 2019 581 (LV) [ay] 19% 2% 14% 19% 23% 5% 17%[az] 1%
19% 2% 13% 4% 19% 21% 5% 17%[ba] 0%
December 3, 2019 Harris withdraws from the race.
Berkeley IGS/LA Times[39] November 21–27, 2019 1,252 (LV) 14% 1% 12% 7% 24% 22% 3% 12%[bb] 9%
SurveyUSA[40] November 20–22, 2019 558 (LV) ± 4.8% 28% 3% 8% 10% 18% 13% 5% 11%[bc] 5%
Capitol Weekly[41] November 1–12, 2019 695 (LV) 18% 1% 14% 6% 21% 27% 4% 8%[bd] 1%
[[Public Policy Institute of
California]][42]
November 3–12, 2019 682 (LV) 24% 1% 7% 8% 17% 23% 5% 6%[be] 9%
November 1, 2019 O'Rourke withdraws from the race.
Change Research[43] October 15–18, 2019 1,631 (LV) 19% 1% 9% 8% 1% 24% 28% 3% 6%[bf]
SurveyUSA[44] October 15–16, 2019 553 (LV) ± 6.9% 33% 2% 4% 8% 2% 17% 18% 4% 5%[bg] 8%
Capitol Weekly[45] October 1–14, 2019 590 (LV) 21% 2% 6% 8% 0% 15% 35% 3% 9%[bh]
[[Public Policy Institute of
California]][46]
September 16–25, 2019 692 (LV) ± 4.9% 22% 2% 6% 8% 1% 21% 23% 3% 7%[bi] 9%
Berkeley IGS/LA Times[47] September 13–18, 2019 2,272 20% 1% 6% 8% 3% 19% 29% 2% 5%[bj] 8%
Emerson College[48] September 13–16, 2019 424 ± 4.7% 26% 1% 4% 6% 5% 26% 20% 7% 4%[bk]
SurveyUSA[49] September 13–15, 2019 547 ± 4.8% 27% 2% 3% 13% 2% 18% 16% 7% 4%[bl] 7%
Change Research/KQED[50] September 12–15, 2019 3,325 ± 1.7% 18% 2% 10% 11% 2% 23% 25% 3% 5%[bm]
Capitol Weekly[51] September 1–13, 2019 599 18% 1% 7% 11% 2% 21% 29% 4% 5%[bn]
Capitol Weekly[52] September 1–13, 2019 5,510 18% 1% 8% 11% 2% 17% 33% 3% 7%[bo]
SurveyUSA[53] August 1–5, 2019 528 ± 6.3% 25% 1% 6% 17% 0% 18% 21% 1% 1%[bp] 10%
PPIC[54] July 14–23, 2019 766 ± 4.4% 11% 5% 19% 12% 15% 14%[bq] 25%
YouGov/CBS News[55] July 9–18, 2019 1,514 ± 2.9% 24% 1% 6% 23% 1% 16% 19% 1% 9%[br]
Quinnipiac University[56] July 10–15, 2019 519 ± 5.7% 21% 1% 3% 23% 1% 18% 16% 2% 2%[bs] 10%
Capitol Weekly[52] July 1–15, 2019 816 20% 1% 8% 20% 2% 16% 25% 1% 7%[bt]
Change Research[57] July 9–11, 2019 1,609 ± 2.5% 17% 1% 8% 23% 2% 20% 22% 2% 5%[bu]
July 8, 2019 Swalwell withdraws from the race.
Capitol Weekly[58] June 1–30, 2019 813 23% 2% 8% 14% 2% 19% 23% 2% 9%[bv]
UC Berkeley[59] June 4–10, 2019 2,131 ± 3.0% 22% 1% 10% 13% 3% 17% 18% 1% 3%[bw] 11%
Capitol Weekly[58] May 1–31, 2019 1,180 29% 2% 9% 17% 4% 22% 11% 0% 6%[bx]
Change Research[60] May 25–28, 2019 1,649 ± 2.4% 30% 1% 12% 15% 3% 23% 12% 1% 2%[by]
Capitol Weekly[58] April 15–30, 2019 1,204 20% 2% 19% 17% 4% 20% 10% 9%[bz]
April 25, 2019 Biden announces his candidacy.
April 14, 2019 Buttigieg announces his candidacy.
Change Research[61] April 6–9, 2019 2,003 ± 2.2% 21% 3% 9% 19% 10% 22% 8% 1% 7%[ca]
5% 11% 27% 16% 28% 9% 1% 5%[cb]
April 8, 2019 Swalwell announces his candidacy.
Quinnipiac University[62] April 3–8, 2019 482 ± 5.9% 26% 2% 7% 17% 4% 18% 7% 1% 6%[cc] 13%
March 14, 2019 O'Rourke announces his candidacy.
February 19, 2019 Sanders announces his candidacy.
Change Research[63] February 9–11, 2019 948 26% 3% 1% 26% 8% 20% 7% 0% 7%[cd]
7% 2% 53% 23% 1% 15%[ce]

Results

2020 California Democratic presidential primary[64]
Candidate Votes % Delegates[5]
Bernie Sanders 2,080,846 35.97 225
Joe Biden 1,613,854 27.90 172
Elizabeth Warren 762,555 13.18 11
Michael Bloomberg 701,803 12.13 7
Pete Buttigieg (withdrawn)[b] 249,256 4.31
Amy Klobuchar (withdrawn)[b] 126,961 2.19
Tom Steyer (withdrawn)[b] 113,092 1.96
Andrew Yang (withdrawn)[a] 43,571 0.75
Tulsi Gabbard 33,769 0.58
Julian Castro (withdrawn) 13,892 0.24
Michael Bennet (withdrawn)[a] 7,377 0.13
Marianne Williamson (withdrawn) 7,052 0.12
Cory Booker (withdrawn) 6,000 0.10
John Delaney (withdrawn) 4,606 0.08
Joe Sestak (withdrawn) 3,270 0.06
Deval Patrick (withdrawn)[a] 2,022 0.03
Other candidates / Write-in [cf]14,438 0.25
Total 5,784,364 100% 415
Bernie Sanders rally at the Los Angeles Convention Center
Senator Bernie Sanders at a campaign rally in San Jose on March 1, 2020
Joe Biden's presidential campaign in Bel Air, Los Angeles, on March 5, 2020
Votes (percentage) and delegates by district[5][65][66]
District Bernie Sanders Joe Biden Michael Bloomberg Elizabeth Warren Total delegates District region Largest city
1st 34% 2 23.7% 2 10.3% 0 12.9% 0 4 Shasta Cascade Chico, Redding
2nd 33.3% 3 25.3% 2 13.5% 0 15.9% 1 6 North Coast Eureka
3rd 34.3% 3 29.3% 2 12% 0 12% 0 5 Sacramento Valley Fairfield
4th 26.1% 2 29.6% 3 14.7% 0 11.4% 0 5 Sierras Roseville
5th 32.7% 3 27.2% 3 14.9% 0 12.6% 0 6 Wine Country Santa Rosa
6th 35.8% 3 28.1% 2 10.7% 0 14.3% 0 5 Sacramento Valley Sacramento
7th 30.9% 2 31.4% 3 13% 0 11.2% 0 5 Sacramento Valley Elk Grove
8th 35.7% 2 31.2% 2 11.8% 0 8.8% 0 4 Eastern Desert Victorville
9th 32.9% 2 32.5% 2 15.9% 1 7% 0 5 San Joaquin Valley Stockton
10th 35.5% 2 29.1% 1 15.3% 1 7.2% 0 4 San Joaquin Valley Modesto
11th 29% 2 30.7% 3 15.3% 1 14.7% 0 6 Bay Area Concord
12th 33.8% 3 23.9% 2 11% 0 23.4% 2 7 San Francisco Bay Area San Francisco
13th 38.7% 3 22.4% 2 8.1% 0 24.7% 2 7 Bay Area Oakland
14th 31.9% 3 26.4% 2 15.6% 1 14.8% 0 6 Bay Area Daly City
15th 34.1% 3 29.5% 3 14.4% 0 11.5% 0 6 Bay Area Hayward
16th 40.9% 3 26.2% 1 12.6% 0 7.2% 0 4 San Joaquin Valley Fresno, Merced
17th 36.1% 3 25.9% 2 14.3% 0 12.5% 0 5 Bay Area Fremont, Santa Clara
18th 26.6% 2 29% 2 15.4% 1 17.1% 1 6 Bay Area Sunnyvale
19th 38.9% 4 25.9% 2 13.6% 0 10.7% 0 6 Bay Area San Jose
20th 39.8% 3 25.5% 2 10.9% 0 13% 0 5 Central Coast Salinas
21st 43.2% 3 25.3% 1 13.7% 0 5.1% 0 4 San Joaquin Valley Kings, Kern, SW Fresno
22nd 34.4% 2 29.1% 2 13% 0 8.8% 0 4 San Joaquin Valley Visalia
23rd 34.9% 2 30.2% 2 12.2% 0 9% 0 4 South Central California Bakersfield
24th 35.3% 3 26.8% 2 10.5% 0 14.7% 0 5 Central Coast Santa Maria
25th 35.6% 3 33.6% 2 10% 0 10% 0 5 LA County Santa Clarita
26th 34.4% 3 31.1% 2 12.1% 0 11.5% 0 5 Central Coast Oxnard
27th 35.9% 2 29.2% 2 10.2% 0 15.7% 1 5 LA County San Gabriel Valley
28th 40% 3 22.7% 2 7.5% 0 21.7% 1 6 LA County Glendale
29th 49.8% 3 21.5% 2 7.7% 0 11.2% 0 5 LA County San Fernando Valley
30th 32.6% 3 31.2% 2 11.2% 0 15.4% 1 6 LA County San Fernando Valley
31st 39.1% 3 32.3% 2 11% 0 8.3% 0 5 Southern California San Bernardino
32nd 44.7% 3 28.2% 2 10.5% 0 7.5% 0 5 LA County El Monte
33rd 26.2% 2 34.2% 3 14.3% 0 16.1% 1 6 LA County Santa Monica, Coastal LA
34th 53.7% 4 16.8% 1 8.1% 0 14.7% 0 5 LA County Downtown Los Angeles
35th 46.6% 2 28.2% 2 10.9% 0 6.2% 0 4 Southern California Fontana
36th 27.5% 1 29.8% 2 15.4% 1 8.1% 0 4 Eastern Desert Indio
37th 35.6% 3 31.3% 2 10.1% 0 16.2% 1 6 LA County West LA
38th 41.7% 3 30.8% 2 10.5% 0 7.6% 0 5 LA County Norwalk
39th 36.7% 3 30.5% 2 12.6% 0 9.6% 0 5 Southern California Fullerton
40th 56.4% 4 20.9% 1 8.9% 0 5.4% 0 5 LA County East Los Angeles
41st 45% 3 27.9% 2 10.7% 0 7.5% 0 5 Southern California Riverside
42nd 37% 3 31.6% 2 12.4% 0 7.9% 0 5 Southern California Corona
43rd 36.5% 3 34.3% 2 10% 0 10.3% 0 5 LA County Inglewood
44th 44% 3 29.6% 2 6.2% 0 9.6% 0 5 Los Angeles County Compton
45th 34% 3 29.1% 2 13.5% 0 12% 0 5 Southern California Irvine
46th 53.7% 2 20% 2 10.5% 0 7.7% 0 4 Southern California Anaheim
47th 38.5% 3 27.3% 2 10.6% 0 12.2% 0 5 Southern California Long Beach
48th 30.4% 2 30.3% 2 16.3% 1 11% 0 5 Southern California Huntington Beach
49th 30.6% 3 30.5% 2 14.6% 0 12.2% 0 5 Southern California Oceanside
50th 34.9% 2 27.6% 2 13% 0 11.3% 0 4 Southern California Escondido
51st 49.2% 3 23.7% 2 11.3% 0 6.8% 0 5 Southern California Downtown San Diego and Border Communities
52nd 30.6% 3 30% 3 13.4% 0 14.6% 0 6 Southern California North San Diego
53rd 37.8% 3 27.3% 3 10.1% 0 14.5% 0 6 Southern California Eastern San Diego and suburbs
Total 36.0% 144 27.9% 109 12.1% 7 13.2% 11 271
Pledged delegates[65]
Delegate type Bernie Sanders Joe Biden Michael Bloomberg Elizabeth Warren
At-large 51 39 0 0
PLEO 30 24 0 0
District-level 144 109 7 11
Total 225 172 7 11

See also

Notes

  1. ^ a b c d e f Candidate withdrew following the New Hampshire primary, when all-mail voting had already begun.
  2. ^ a b c d e f Candidate withdrew shortly before the primary, when all-mail voting had already begun.
  3. ^ Calculated by taking the difference of 100% and all other candidates combined
  4. ^ includes Buttigieg with 6.0%; Klobuchar with 4.0%; Steyer not averaged
  5. ^ FiveThirtyEight aggregates polls with a trendline regression of polls rather than a strict average of recent polls.
  6. ^ a b Key:
    A – all adults
    RV – registered voters
    LV – likely voters
    V – unclear
  7. ^ Gabbard with 0.1%; "Other" with 5.9%
  8. ^ Gabbard with 1%
  9. ^ Gabbard with 1%; "Other" with 1%
  10. ^ Gabbard with 1%
  11. ^ Gabbard with 1%
  12. ^ Gabbard with 1%; "Someone else" with 3%
  13. ^ Gabbard with 3%
  14. ^ Gabbard with 3%
  15. ^ Gabbard with 1%
  16. ^ If only the two candidates for which percentages are listed could be voted for
  17. ^ If only the two candidates for which percentages are listed could be voted for
  18. ^ If only the two candidates for which percentages are listed could be voted for
  19. ^ Gabbard with 1%; "Someone else" with 0%; "None/No one" with 2%
  20. ^ Gabbard with 2%
  21. ^ Gabbard with 1%; "Others" with 1%
  22. ^ Included in poll despite being withdrawn because he is still on the ballot.
  23. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Castro with 1%; Bennet, Williamson, Patrick, Sestak, Delaney, Greenstein, Ellinger, Boyd, and De La Fuente with 0%
  24. ^ Gabbard with 4%; "Another candidate" with 3%
  25. ^ Gabbard with 2%; "Other" with 1%
  26. ^ If only the two candidates for which percentages are listed could be voted for
  27. ^ "Already voted" with 10%; "neither" with 5%
  28. ^ If only the two candidates for which percentages are listed could be voted for
  29. ^ "Already voted" with 10%; "neither" with 4%
  30. ^ If only the two candidates for which percentages are listed could be voted for
  31. ^ "Already voted" with 10%; "neither" with 6%
  32. ^ If only the two candidates for which percentages are listed could be voted for
  33. ^ "Already voted" with 10%; "neither" with 6%
  34. ^ Tulsi Gabbard 1%; someone else 1%
  35. ^ "Some other Democrat" with 1%
  36. ^ Gabbard with 2%
  37. ^ "someone else/skipped"
  38. ^ Answers listed in this row are for the question, "If electability wasn't a concern, who would you support?"
  39. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Booker with 2%; Williamson with 1%; Patrick with 0%
  40. ^ Listed as "no response"
  41. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Booker, Patrick and Williamson with 1%; Delaney with 0%
  42. ^ Listed as "no response"
  43. ^ Gabbard with 4%; Bennet, Delaney and Patrick with <1%
  44. ^ Gabbard with 1.4%; Bennet with 0.9%; Booker with 0.8%; "All others" with 0.5%
  45. ^ Gabbard with 2%; others with 0%
  46. ^ someone else (included Bloomberg) 6%
  47. ^ Booker and "someone else" with 1%
  48. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Booker with 1%; Delaney, Patrick and Williamson with 0%; no response with 0%
  49. ^ Bloomberg, Castro and Gabbard with 3%; Steyer with 2%; Klobuchar and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Delaney and Patrick with 0%
  50. ^ Bloomberg with 5%; Gabbard and Klobuchar with 2%; Castro and Steyer with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Patrick, and Williamson with 0%; "None/No one" with 1%
  51. ^ The top row presents results which exclude Kamala Harris as an option.
  52. ^ Bloomberg with 5%; Gabbard and Klobuchar with 4%; Castro with 2%; Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Delaney and Patrick with 0%
  53. ^ Bloomberg with 5%; Gabbard and Klobuchar with 4%; Castro, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Delaney with 0%; Patrick with no voters
  54. ^ Klobuchar with 3%; Bloomberg with 2%; Bennet, Castro, Gabbard, Steyer with 1%, Bullock, Delaney, Patrick, Sestak and Williamson with 0%
  55. ^ Bloomberg and Steyer with 3%; Gabbard with 2%; Castro and Klobuchar with 1%; Patrick with 0%; others with 1%
  56. ^ Gabbard and Klobuchar with 3%; Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Castro and Delaney with 0%
  57. ^ Klobuchar and Steyer with 1%; other with 4%
  58. ^ Gabbard and Klobuchar with 2%; Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, and Sestak with 0%
  59. ^ Castro, Gabbard, Klobuchar, Steyer, and some other Democrat with 1%
  60. ^ Castro and Gabbard with 2%; Klobuchar, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; de Blasio and Ryan with 0%; no response with 2%
  61. ^ Castro with 2%; Klobuchar and Steyer with 1%; someone else with 3%
  62. ^ Klobuchar with 2%; Bennet, Castro and Gabbard with 1%; Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer and Williamson with 0%;
  63. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Castro and Steyer with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Bullock, Delaney, Klobuchar, Messam, Ryan, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; someone else with 1%
  64. ^ Castro with 2%; Klobuchar with 1%; someone else with 1%
  65. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Castro, Klobuchar and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Bullock, Delaney, Messam, Ryan, Sestak and Steyer with 0%
  66. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Castro, Klobuchar and Williamson with 1%; Steyer with 0%
  67. ^ Gabbard with 3%; Castro, Klobuchar, Steyer and Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney and Ryan with 0%
  68. ^ Gabbard with 1%
  69. ^ "Anyone" with 2%; "None of them" with 5%; "Others" with 7%
  70. ^ Bennet, Castro, Gabbard, Gravel, Klobuchar, Steyer, Williamson with 1%; Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, and Sestak with 0%
  71. ^ Castro and Inslee with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Messam, Moulton, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer, and Williamson with <1%, others with <1%
  72. ^ Castro, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Inslee, Klobuchar, & Williamson with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, de Blasio, Delaney, Hickenlooper, Ryan, Swalwell & Steyer with 0%
  73. ^ Gabbard with 2%; Castro, Klobuchar & Inslee with 1%; Bennet, de Blasio, Delaney, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Messam, Ryan, Sestak, Steyer & Williamson with 0%
  74. ^ Gabbard & Hickenlooper with 2%; Bennet, Gillibrand & Klobuchar with 1%; Bullock, Castro, de Blasio, Delaney, Inslee, Moulton, Ryan & Williamson with 0%
  75. ^ Castro and Klobuchar with 1%; Bullock, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
  76. ^ Castro, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Ryan & Swalwell with 1%; Bullock, de Blasio, Gabbard, Inslee & Williamson with 0%
  77. ^ Castro and Gabbard with 1%; Abrams, Bennet, Gillibrand, Gravel, Hickenlooper, Klobuchar, Inslee, Moulton, Ryan, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
  78. ^ Klobuchar with 3%; Inslee with 2%; Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Ryan & Swalwell with 1%; Castro with 0%
  79. ^ Castro with 2%; Abrams, Gabbard, Inslee, Klobuchar, and Swalwell with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Messam, Ryan, and Williamson with 0%
  80. ^ Castro with 2%; Gabbard, Klobuchar, and Ryan with 1%; Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Messam, and Williamson with 0%
  81. ^ Castro and Klobuchar with 2%; Gabbard and Inslee with 1%; Delaney, Gillibrand, Hickenlooper, Messam, and Williamson with <1%; others with <1%
  82. ^ Castro with 2%; Brown, Gabbard, Gillibrand, Holder, and Klobuchar with 1%; Bloomberg, Bullock, Cuomo, Delaney, Hickenlooper, Inslee, Swalwell, and Williamson with 0%
  83. ^ Castro with 6%; Gabbard with 4%; Delaney and Gillibrand with 2%; Williamson with 1%
  84. ^ Including 34 write-in votes

References

  1. ^ "Exit and entrance polls from the 2020 primaries and caucuses". CNN. Retrieved March 10, 2020.
  2. ^ Martin, Jonathan; Burns, Alexander (March 3, 2020). "Biden Revives Campaign, Winning Nine States, but Sanders Takes California". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved July 8, 2020.
  3. ^ Putnam, Josh. "The 2020 Presidential Primary Calendar". Frontloading HQ. Retrieved June 22, 2019.
  4. ^ Johnson, Alex (September 27, 2017). "California Primaries Move to Super Tuesday to Stop Being Irrelevant". NBC News. Retrieved June 22, 2019.
  5. ^ a b c d e "California Democratic Delegation 2020". The Green Papers. June 21, 2019. Retrieved June 22, 2019.
  6. ^ "Democratic Timing Penalties and Bonuses". The Green Papers. November 24, 2021. Retrieved March 19, 2022.
  7. ^ "Certified List of Statewide Candidates" (PDF). CA Secretary of State. March 4, 2020.
  8. ^ 270 to Win
  9. ^ RealClear Politics
  10. ^ FiveThirtyEight
  11. ^ Swayable Archived 2020-03-03 at the Wayback Machine
  12. ^ Data for Progress
  13. ^ AtlasIntel
  14. ^ Point Blank Political
  15. ^ Emerson College/Nexstar
  16. ^ YouGov/CBS News
  17. ^ Suffolk University
  18. ^ YouGov/Hoover
    Institution/Stanford University
  19. ^ Point Blank Political
  20. ^ CNN/SSRS
  21. ^ Point Blank Political
  22. ^ Berkeley IGS/LA Times
  23. ^ Change Research/KQED News
  24. ^ University of Massachusetts Lowell
  25. ^ Monmouth University
  26. ^ Public Policy Institute of California
  27. ^ SurveyUSA
  28. ^ YouGov/USC
  29. ^ Capitol Weekly
  30. ^ Change Research/KQED News
  31. ^ Berkeley IGS/LA Times
  32. ^ SurveyUSA
  33. ^ Public Policy Institute of California/Mercury News
  34. ^ Tulchin Research/USC Rossier/The Hill
  35. ^ Capitol Weekly
  36. ^ Change Research/KQED News
  37. ^ CNN/SSRS
  38. ^ Capitol Weekly
  39. ^ Berkeley IGS/LA Times
  40. ^ SurveyUSA
  41. ^ Capitol Weekly
  42. ^ Public Policy Institute of
    California
  43. ^ Change Research Archived 2019-10-24 at the Wayback Machine
  44. ^ SurveyUSA
  45. ^ Capitol Weekly
  46. ^ Public Policy Institute of
    California
  47. ^ Berkeley IGS/LA Times
  48. ^ Emerson College
  49. ^ SurveyUSA
  50. ^ Change Research/KQED
  51. ^ Capitol Weekly
  52. ^ a b Capitol Weekly
  53. ^ SurveyUSA
  54. ^ PPIC
  55. ^ YouGov/CBS News
  56. ^ "Quinnipiac University". Archived from the original on July 18, 2019. Retrieved July 25, 2019.
  57. ^ Change Research Archived 2019-07-31 at the Wayback Machine
  58. ^ a b c Aaron Bycoffe, Ritchie King and Dhrumil Mehta (June 28, 2018). "California Polls". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved September 1, 2019.
  59. ^ UC Berkeley
  60. ^ Change Research
  61. ^ Change Research
  62. ^ Quinnipiac University
  63. ^ Change Research
  64. ^ "Statement of Vote: Presidential Primary Election, March 3, 2020" (PDF). Secretary of State of California. May 1, 2020. Retrieved July 12, 2020.
  65. ^ a b "Presidential Primary Election - Statement of Vote, March 3, 2020 :: California Secretary of State". www.sos.ca.gov.
  66. ^ Delegate and Alternate Allocation per Congressional District California Democratic Party.

Read other articles:

2002 World JuniorChampionships in AthleticsTrack events100 mmenwomen200 mmenwomen400 mmenwomen800 mmenwomen1500 mmenwomen3000 mwomen5000 mmenwomen10,000 mmen100 m hurdleswomen110 m hurdlesmen400 m hurdlesmenwomen3000 msteeplechasemen4 × 100 m relaymenwomen4 × 400 m relaymenwomen10,000 m walkmenwomenField eventsHigh jumpmenwomenPole vaultmenwomenLong jumpmenwomenTriple jumpmenwomenShot putmenwomenDiscus throwmenwomenHammer throwmenwomenJavelin throwmenwomenCombined eventsHeptathlonwomenDecat...

 

Gustav Peter Bucky (Leipzig, 3 de setembro de 1880 — Nova Iorque, 19 de fevereiro de 1963) foi um físico e radiologista alemão, inventor da grade anti-espalhamento em aparelhos de raios X, desenvolvida por ele em 1913. Este artigo ou secção resulta, no todo ou em parte, de uma tradução do artigo «Gustav Peter Bucky» na Wikipédia em alemão, na versão original. Você pode incluir conceitos culturais lusófonos de fontes em português com referências e inseri-las corretamente no te...

 

Калузько-Ризька лінія Московський метрополітен Відкриття першої ділянки 1958 Довжина, км 37,8 Кількість станцій 24 Час проїзду, хв 55,5 Максимальна кількість вагонів у складі поїзда 8 Кількість вагонів у складі поїзда 8 Середньодобове перевезення пасажирів, тис. осіб/добу 910 (2011)

كايلو رين   معلومات شخصية اسم الولادة (بالإنجليزية: Ben Solo)‏  الأب هان سولو[1]  الأم الأميرة ليا[1]  أقرباء لوك سكاي ووكر، دارث فيدر، بادمي أميدالا عائلة هان سولو، الأميرة ليا الحياة العملية شخصية حرب النجوم أول ظهور حرب النجوم: القوة تنهض المبتكر لورانس كازد...

 

American journalist Thomas M. StorkeUnited States Senatorfrom CaliforniaIn officeNovember 9, 1938 – January 3, 1939Appointed byFrank MerriamPreceded byWilliam Gibbs McAdooSucceeded bySheridan Downey Personal detailsBorn(1876-11-23)November 23, 1876Santa Barbara, California, U.S.DiedOctober 12, 1971(1971-10-12) (aged 94)Santa Barbara, California, U.S.Resting placeSanta Barbara Cemetery, Montecito, California, U.S.Political partyDemocraticSpouse(s)Elsie Smith (1880-1916), m. 190...

 

Esports tournament in Berlin, Germany 2021 Valorant ChampionsTournament informationGameValorantLocationBerlin, GermanyDatesDecember 1–12AdministratorsRiot GamesTournamentformat(s) 2 stages Group stage: Double elimination bracket Knock-out stage: Single elimination bracket Venue(s) 2 (in Berlin) Marlene-Dietrich-Halle(Group stage & Quarterfinals) Verti Music Hall(Semifinals & Finals) Teams16Purse$1,000,000 USDFinal positionsChampionsAcendRunner-upGambit EsportsMVPAleksander zeek Zygm...

Nine Bostonians who organized demonstrations against the Stamp Act of 1765 Bostonians Reading the Stamp Act. From Stranger's Illustrated Guide to Boston and Its Suburbs by J. H. Stark, 1882. The Loyal Nine (also spelled Loyall Nine) were nine American patriots from Boston who met in secret to plan protests against the Stamp Act of 1765. Mostly middle-class businessmen, the Loyal Nine enlisted Ebenezer Mackintosh to rally large crowds of commoners to their cause and provided the protesters wit...

 

Video editing application by Blackmagic Design DaVinci ResolveLogo for version 18DaVinci Resolve version 15Developer(s)Blackmagic Design (2009–present)da Vinci Systems (2004–2009)Initial release2004; 19 years ago (2004)Stable release18.6 / 14 September 2023; 2 months ago (2023-09-14)[1] Operating systemmacOSWindowsLinuxiPadOSAvailable in10 languagesList of languagesEnglishSpanishJapaneseSimplified ChineseFrenchPortugueseRussianKoreanThaiVietname...

 

Roman Polański Roman Polański (2011) Prawdziwe imię i nazwisko Rajmund Roman Thierry Polański Imię i nazwisko przy narodzeniu Raymond Thierry Liebling Data i miejsce urodzenia 18 sierpnia 1933 Paryż Zawód reżyser, scenarzysta, aktor, producent filmowy Współmałżonek Barbara Kwiatkowska(1959–1962)Sharon Tate(1968–1969)Emmanuelle Seigner(od 1989) Lata aktywności od 1954 Odznaczenia Multimedia w Wikimedia Commons Cytaty w Wikicytatach Roman Polański, właśc. Rajmund Roman ...

The Native Star AuthorM. K. HobsonCover artistDavid StevensonCountryUnited StatesLanguageEnglishGenreHistorical FantasyPublisherBantam SpectraPublication dateOctober 2010Media typePrint (Paperback)ISBN978-0-553-59265-8Followed byThe Hidden Goddess  The Native Star is a historical fantasy novel, and the first novel from writer M. K. Hobson. It was nominated for the 2010 Nebula Award. Plot summary The Native Star, set in America in 1876, follows the adventures of Emily Edwar...

 

Indian railway station Bajpur Railway StationIndian Railways stationIndian Railways logoGeneral informationLocationBajpur, UttarakhandIndiaCoordinates29°09′28″N 79°08′47″E / 29.1579°N 79.1465°E / 29.1579; 79.1465Elevation231 metres (758 ft)Owned byIndian RailwaysOperated byIzzatnagar railway divisionPlatforms2TracksSingle diesel broad gaugeConnectionsAuto standConstructionStructure typeStandard (on-ground station)ParkingNoBicycle facilitiesNoOther info...

 

Strelka Institute Strelka Institute for Media, Architecture and Design is a non-profit international educational project, founded in 2009 and located in Moscow. Strelka incorporates an education programme on urbanism and urban development aimed at professionals with a higher education, a public summer programme, the Strelka Press publishing house, and KB Strelka, the consulting arm of the Institute. Strelka has been listed among the top-100 best architecture schools in 2014, according to Domu...

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: Interchange lemma – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) This article includes a...

 

Gordon D'Arcy Gordon D'Arcy nel 2006 Dati biografici Paese  Irlanda Altezza 180 cm Peso 91 kg Rugby a 15 Union  Irlanda Ruolo Tre quarti centro Squadra  Leinster Ritirato 2015 Carriera Attività provinciale 1998-2002 Leinster12 (20) Attività di club[1] 2001-2015 Leinster260 (339) Attività da giocatore internazionale 1999-20152005 Irlanda British & Irish Lions82 (35)1 (0) 1. A partire dalla stagione 1995-96 le statistiche di club si riferiscono ai soli campi...

 

Former theatre and cinema in Perth, Western Australia Capitol TheatreCapitol Theatre, c.1930Address10 William StreetPerthAustraliaOwnerTemple Court Buildings LimitedCapacity2,250 seatsConstructionOpened4 May 1929Demolished1968ArchitectGeorge Temple-PooleC. MouritzenBuilderE. Allwood[1] Capitol Theatre was a George Temple-Poole designed theatre and cinema[2] located at 10 William Street Perth. The theatre was officially opened on 4 May 1929[3] by the Mayor of Perth, Jam...

1969 Italian filmDillinger Is DeadTheatrical release posterDirected byMarco FerreriWritten byMarco FerreriSergio BazziniProduced byEver HaggiagAlfred Levyfor Pegaso FilmStarringMichel PiccoliAnita PallenbergAnnie GirardotCinematographyMario VulpianiEdited byMirella MencioMusic byTeo UsuelliDistributed byRoissy FilmsRelease date23 January 1969Running time95 minutesCountryItalyLanguageItalian Dillinger Is Dead (Italian: Dillinger è morto) is a 1969 Italian drama directed by Marco Ferreri. It s...

 

Questa voce o sezione sull'argomento centri abitati della Spagna non cita le fonti necessarie o quelle presenti sono insufficienti. Puoi migliorare questa voce aggiungendo citazioni da fonti attendibili secondo le linee guida sull'uso delle fonti. Segui i suggerimenti del progetto di riferimento. MuñograndecomuneMuñogrande – Veduta LocalizzazioneStato Spagna Comunità autonoma Castiglia e León Provincia Ávila TerritorioCoordinate40°49′15.96″N 4°55′18.84″W...

 

  Infraphulia illimani TaxonomíaReino: AnimaliaFilo: ArthropodaClase: InsectaOrden: LepidopteraSuborden: GlossataInfraorden: HeteroneuraDivisión: DitrysiaSuperfamilia: PapilionoideaFamilia: PieridaeSubfamilia: PierinaeGénero: InfraphuliaEspecie: I. illimaniWeymer, 1890[editar datos en Wikidata] Infraphulia illimani es una especie de mariposa, de la familia de las piérides, que fue descrita originalmente con el nombre de Phulia illimani, por Gustav Weymer, en 1890, a partir ...

1981 New Zealand Grand Prix 27th New Zealand Grand Prix Race detailsDate 10 January 1981Location Pukekohe Park Raceway, Pukekohe, New ZealandCourse Permanent racing facilityCourse length 2.82 km (1.76 miles)Distance 60 laps, 169.2 km (105.6 miles)Pole positionDriver Steve Millen Ralt-FordTime 0.57.9PodiumFirst Dave McMillan Ralt-FordSecond David Oxton Ralt-FordThird Steve Millen Ralt-FordMotor car race The 1981 New Zealand Grand Prix was a race held at the Pukekohe Park Raceway on 10 January ...

 

Marvin Davila AquinoMinundaganTinambac, Camarines SurKasibotanParasurat, paratukdôNasyunalidadFilipinoLahìBikolanoGenreRawitdawit, nobela Si Marvin Davila Aquino na tubong Tinambac, Camarines Sur sarong paratukdô, parasurat asin an kagsurat kan Alunsina Kan Dagat sarong nobela na napili bilang pinalista sa Premyo Valledor taon 2019.[1] Kan 2016, an saiyang usipon na Abo sa Pag-gabas nagin pinalista man sa Premio Tomas Arejola para sa Literaturang Bikolnon.[2] Siya myembro k...

 

Strategi Solo vs Squad di Free Fire: Cara Menang Mudah!