Hey, are you still interested in participating at CheapGrub? I'd really like to see you there more often. I'm sure you'd be a good editor for the articles (which have, for the most part, become stale). obentomusubi 08:23, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Come and say hi! ;) How ya doin'? Goblin 22:38, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I took care of all the red links in the Jelckama article. Mighty Wodan (talk) 08:13, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey there buddy :). Yes Al-Nassr is the correct name of the club but I tried to do the same thing done in the English Wikipedia in which they have Al-Nasr is the main page and Al-Nassr as the page that directs to the other page. By the way how can I link it to Al-Nassr pages in other languages and how can I change my username here :D ?. Sorry for bothering. Moho (talk) 03:52, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I was wondering whether I have to attribute information that came from en.wp. I read what you posted here but does that only apply to article creation? Griffinofwales (talk) 18:25, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Grrrr. I would change the block settings :P You were too fast. I had waited that he replied ;) Regards, Barras (talk) 21:05, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I'm attempting to try and get a problem user on both this site and EN to contribute meaningfully. I have no alternative but to communicate on his most recent talk page. Part of his rehab agreement will be not to edit this site, so with any luck, you won't have to deal with him here. I blocked a whole bunch of his socks at EN and I simply don't want to play "whack-a-vandal" at this point. Thanks for understanding. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Much obliged and thanks for the props. :) Believe me, I'm aware of the tremendous differences here. I've found it more difficult to edit than EN simply because I have to pull waaaay back with the fifty-cent terms. I wish more EN users would realize that and not toss problematic users your way as if this were some sort of kindergarten. Cross your fingers and hope I can do something with this guy. I can block him at EN if he becomes an issue and alert you over here since I don't have admin rights here. Just rollbacks. Anyway, thanks again. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:06, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You have my word on it. I've been paraphrasing some of my work from EN and I'm amazed at the amount of really glaring red links on subjects which should be here but aren't. Thank you very much for the support. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:39, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I can not change the page due to it's semi-protection and I just want to help out
This particular sentence I feel should be changed due to the idea that he did not wish to purge the Communist Party
3 paragraphs down from the top, beginning section.
"a campaign to purge the Communist Party of people accused of corruption or treachery"
The definition of purge is: 1 a: to clear of guilt b: to free from moral or ceremonial defilement,(Merriam-Webster) however Stalin wished have these people removed not to simply have them cleared. It's clear in the sources used to site this particular paragraph.
A better sentence would be "a treaty to have the people accused of corruption and/or ill-will within the Communist Party removed."
I'm excited to see who responds most rapidly to my request. Thank you and have a wonderful day!!
BuzzingHorse (talk) 07:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've unblocked Aleksa Lukic from editing his talk page only. I know this is bordering on wheel warring, so my apologies if you feel that it was out of place. While I support your block of his edit privileges on the rest of the wiki, I feel that he should be allowed to ask about his block, so long as he does so in a civil and good faith manner. From what he had written since his block, I don't see any reason why he should have his talk page locked. I feel very much that this is only so that we have a record of his conversation (he's been on IRC for a while, but that carries no weight), and I fully support your block of his editing privileges. I hope you understand. Thanks! EhJJTALK 17:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I told him, no intentionally bad edits. I think this qualifies as one. Thanks for letting me know. I'll withdraw the offer. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:35, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I would much rather try and turn a user like this; no way would I try and help a malicious vandal. I don't think this kid is as much malicious as he is simply immature. Maybe someday. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 22:40, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wanted to say thanks for the rollback approval... which I didn't promptly use on any pages, especially Peter Ham. I left a note about that one (and the user with the chronic revert issues) on the WP:AN page. I think I detect the scent of a carnivorous rodent, but let someone else double-check, I figure. Zephyrad (talk) 03:48, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]