Apparently you deleted my article on Kevin Guo on Simple English Wikipedia. Your reason stated was that the article did not show notability (QD A4). It is definitely a notale subject. Please revert the deletion.
~Henry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.62.10.3 (talk • contribs)
That IP (24.119.29.143) had 0 warnings, and most (if not all) the edits were in good faith. I'm not sure if you realized that. Griffinofwales (talk) 03:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've finally come back after all these weeks of absence. —Mythdon [talk] [changes] 20:02, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed you just blocked The Dictator (talk · contribs), is he a sock of Señor Kruzkin (talk · contribs) as well? Tiptoety talk 04:52, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
;-) — RyanCross (talk) 19:01, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You have a moment? NonvocalScream (talk) 19:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can you approve my new bot task, the test edits are in my NonvocalScream recent editing history. Thanks, NonvocalScream (talk) 17:51, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! Thank you for the message. The meet up was great - even though it was just the three of us (I turned up half an hour late by the way). There was discussion on almost any topic that could be covered - ones that were lengthy include the Simple English Wikipedia, its relation to the larger English-language Wikipedia, the current coverage of Pakistan on the wiki (and in all Wikimedia projects in general) and of course the WikiProject Pakistan. Talking from the bottom line, it was a casual social event we looked up to.
It's nice to see the rate at which internet culture is expanding globally - and from this I include the concept of Wikipedia "meetups." I think we should promote more events like these. Once again thanks for your interest. Omparkash (talk) 01:12, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
That wasn't an open proxy, it's a school IP. The IP resolves to prx4.vicdir.schools.net.au. --Bsadowski1 02:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But that was absolutely uncalled for, calling me childish because I have less edits than you, and because I made an edit you considered poor. Did you ever think about how I might feel, getting shot down at an honest attempt to constructively edit this wiki? You need to learn some self control. Serious op (talk) 05:16, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The article already exists here. I have Qd tagged. Griffinofwales (talk) 14:31, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Teh Chatz of Internetz Relayz? Goblin 15:01, 23 October 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Fr33kman![reply]
I've replied. —Mythdon [talk] [changes] 20:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for alerting me to Bots. I have been reading up about them. Not being very technical I have never quite understood what they were. It's the first time I had needed to make so many similar changes. Hikitsurisan (talk) 22:38, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Did you say something about stopping by? Until It Sleeps Talk • Contribs 04:35, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Fr33kman, if you don't mind, would you be interested in doing an interview for Simple News? –Juliancolton | Talk 19:20, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Fr33kman thank you for helping me and changing my name. Please my talk page I have a messige for you. I do not know if you can post it on my IP's page. Any way good lick and wish you the best.(JustinFrancis)
Hi, have there been any recent developments in my ban from #wikipedia-simple? Or have they decided that I don't deserve to be in their chat channel, and that I'm not worthy of keeping? Jonas R 216.241.55.204 (talk) 16:46, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This weeks interview is with Fr33kman.
Click here for Fr33kman's interview!
Would you mind coming into my IRC channel for a second please? Sorry for contacting you this way, I didn't know how else to do so.-- † CR90 11:11, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We Are One! Simple News is now One Year Old, and we would like to thank all of the Simple English Wikipedia contributors who have helped with it during this time. As we move into our second year please continue to send in your contributions, and let's try to develop Simple News further!
On that note, please do continue to submit articles, QandAs and the like. You may have noticed that recent Issues have been fairly bare - and the only way that will change will be with your help.
Thank You!
Goblin, On Behalf of the Simple News Team. 15:17, 24 November 2009 (UTC) I ♥ Fr33kman![reply]
Yottie =talk= 20:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nice to see you around again. I hope your name popping up on recent changes will be a more common occurrence. :) Yours, ···Katerenka (討論) 03:28, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hey fr33kman, it would be great if I could talk to you in my irc channel real quick. Thanks.-- † CR90 07:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Do they have the toasters?
Hi Fr33kman, thanks for the input on the talk page and on IRC, it has helped me sort out a few things in my ideas. I have made a new proposal, could you have another look and leave a comment on Wikipedia talk:Service awards, thanks, Peterdownunder (talk) 12:08, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gratzi. Never thought about that. :) Kennedy (talk • changes). 20:06, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Admins, please help me! No-no-no!!! I not insulting! How to create the userboxes? Some userboxes like the Babel Like the en-5 Chris.Taub.M.D. (talk) 06:46, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Fr33kman,
Children Safety Home is a non profit Organization.
I had taken permissions from them to use their web content.
Now you deleted the page, thats okay.
But can you say me how can i use the web content from Children Safety Home Nepal and create the page. More then 60% of the material was originally created.
I'm not disprupting anything, I'm simply having some fun with the edit summary (which I didn't know anyone ever looked at), at no-ones expense.
Saying ON A PAGE "this wikipedea is for those who are stuperbly thick" isn't very nice, i admit. But, i didn't actaully write that, I wrote something similar, & toned down, in the edit summary, which only some editors ever bother to look at, so very few people who are watching me or those articles will ever see it. & the only people who'll see it are editors, thus limiting the people who'll see it anyway.Don'tt block me for my harmless & innecent fun, as thats just plain communism. Wikipedea has a page about good faith & not 'biting' new commers, I'm new to simple wikipedea, don't bite me! BTW, here is the Uniform Resource Locator (or URL for short & to simplify), I don't know how to put a link to it so: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Please_do_not_bite_the_newcomers. Don't look back in anger (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am following the rules (which i have read by the way) & I missed the part where it says "if editors bite don't stand up for your self", & I didn't say wikipedea is a communism, (bt It does work like one,[hop over to my talk for a full explanation]) I said in blocking me, you would be acting like a communist. & i'm not lecturing anyone, though you have inspired me to put a lecture on my page, (though i must warn you, it won't be simplified). I won't directly lecture anyone, only those who seek one from my page. I don't mean any offence, I'm just like that, you may be teething, but please don't bite. Wikipedea has no ads either, but I may say I like something, so don't say i'm breaking rules, & don't bite me. Treat what i say as entertainment - but under no surcunstances go & buy anything I like. I know you will probably find me Irritating, but please keep those teeth away, I won't always be an irritating neiucance, I try on opinions much like i try on clothes, standing in front of the mirror wondering if they suit me. I'm not jaut being bitten it seems, I'm being eaten. so, as i don't really care about editors probems with me, i'm offering you & the others a chance to drop the subject, & forgive me for my harmless fun & let by gones be just that. comment warring solves nothing. Don't look back in anger (talk) 15:51, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is a subject to drop, i regard constant uncalled for moaning as biting, several people ganging up on me for a harmless joke is certainly biting. I have been constructing, there is just so little here, & so little of it that adding difficult as i'm not sure what level of complexity this wp's users can understand. not much it seems after the response of my harmless jest, which you would have never even seen without my contributions. To sum it up: If i hadn't been Editing/contributing, there would be no edit summary comment for you to winge at me for, i have contributed to Los Angelese & Green Day, & written a harmless comment about the lack of any sort of complexity & tehn you moan at me & tell me to contribute or I'll get blocked, do you see the paradox?(& I'm quite sure blackmail is aginst the rules). I appriciate what you are trying to do, have a wikipedea that normal people can understand as the standard wikipedea has got more complicated & full fo jargon. "serious encyclopedea"?? wikipedea is full of people like you who think they know it all, so imput thier opinions & false data into articles, I have harmlessly put my opinion in a edit summary, which does not affect the article. & as for "Continuing to argue will see you blocked", i'm the one who is offering to stop arguing, you are the one who is continuing the argument! why don't you do something usefull & block your self? "feeling that you shall be allowed to "content war"" You are the one who brought this into the argument which you won't let me finish, I am the one who said that a comment war, or put simply so you can understand: argument is not solving the problem. & I don't have a user page. & I don't claim to "own the userpage", So, Why don't you do what wikipedea doesn't & check the facts!? & stop twisting my words to suit your meaning.
I'm guessing that simple wikipedea is fine with arguments as you threw my offer to drop the topic & stop a pointless argument back in my face. Enjoy the war, you are the one continuing the fighting, not me. In the words of Gene Hunt off Ashes To Ashes "I ask for the truth & you piss in my face" well said I think. Don't look back in anger (talk) 16:41, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A user (Chuckcreator) that you recently {{checkuserblock}}'d is asking to be unblocked. As you were the blocking admin, I thought that I would let you know. Cheers, Lauryn Ashby (d) 20:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Grawp? Wow, exciting. That was basically just a big "WTF" moment for me...I'm SO out of practice, ha. Thank you for helping to deal with him/her/it. :D --Isis♠(talk) 04:44, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think I made a mistake... I warned her a few weeks ago and I'm so busy these days that I forgot why I warned her... But I think it was because she was vandalizing the article about "Pugs". Now that I see, maybe it's not a vandal... Anyway thankyou, Fr33kman (What should I call you?). Cheers and happy editing! Miss Tilney (talk) 04:46, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much for welcoming me, Fr33kman! I have a tiny question. It's hard to keep on writing 'Fr33kman,' so can I just call you Freak-man? No, no, it was a joke. Don't get offended. God Bless, Mella Mouse (talk) 05:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I have undone your edit on Death of Tina Watson, we should not return the orphan tag to that article until a discussion has been held on the issue as different user disagree.. sutch as me.. on taging of the article. Please start by joining the discussion on the articles talk page.--Sinbad (talk) 17:00, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
blah
Nice catch there. I thought something was a bit suspicious, but as I had no evidence otherwise, assumed good faith. Glad to know that people like you are around to clean things up when mistakes are made. Thanks, Lauryn Ashby (d) 03:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thought I'd ask you rather than the Mouse: Why are edits categorized as vandalism removed from the edit history? Is this unique on simple?
Yesterday you posted this [1] but I don't see a block at all. I ask because the user edited just now and had two articles deleted. I know the articles that (s)he created were continuously created by socks on En., so I assume it's related, but could you take action here if you still think it's appropriate? Thanks, Either way (talk) 16:40, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am sure I should not be using wikipedia when informing people of being on a wikibreak, but--I did not know that my little sister, Eunice, was using wikipedia too. I never knew that she was Mella Mouse, and of course since we are sisters we use the same computer and live together. One day, she had logged in simple wiki, and went away, and I came to use it--not knowing that the account I was using was accidently Eunice's. Pmlineditor had adopted me, and he wrote the note to me about rollbacking. I apologized to him, and said I would try to use it better, but I felt sad, ashamed, and guilty because I didn't use the rollback right, and so I quickly erased the note so that nobody else woud see it and think that I was a bad user. Oh, yes, and the IP adress is probably the same because we use the same computer. After having a wikibreak, I could not help but revert a few vandals because they were so annoying, so I used the IP adress to revert them. Please do not mistake Eunice as my sockpuppet. Thankyou, and best regards, Miss Tilney (talk) 03:39, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
... for the message! Amandajm (talk) 04:15, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lotta vandalism going down on recent changes. :p Lauryn☆ 17:24, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I replied at en:User talk:The New Mikemoral. --Mikemoral♪♫ 23:56, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for writing, Classical Esther 03:05, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for spamming you with my boring messages again...;) Classical Esther 03:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Fr33kman, thank you very, very much for your email. It was not only wise, but very kind. I should quite abhor myself if I really had sockpuppets, despite the amazing trust that has been lavished upon me. Will you be so very kind as to tell me where the discussion took place? I would like to read it. Well, thank you once again, both for trusting me and writing to me! you have henceforth my purest esteem, my fullest gratitude, and my deepest respect! Yours truly, Classical Esther 22:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kitty Morland (talk) 04:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thankyou for changing it (my name), kind, kind Fr33kman! You are extremely good in these things, and I am most obliged to you! Happily, Pretty Lydie (talk) 05:02, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Whew, that's a relief! Thanks for blocking Starbuilder22. I think he's using about three sockpuppets to vandalize Wikipedia, and it was hard work fighting him! He kept on writing some annoying things about ghosts eating toast halfway up the lamppost. Regards, Classical Esther 06:01, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I can haz tool, plz? PMBL is annoying. Thanks in advance, Lauryn☆ 15:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
O, sorry, Fr33kman... I didn't rollback it because I thought it was vandalism, but because I thought it was NPOV, like you said. That person wasn't exactly being neutral enough, I think. Was it right to rollback the edits like that? I'll be especially careful next time! Thankyou for always being helpful and kind to me and Esther. :) Have a good time on wikipedia, and God bless! Belle (talk) 08:26, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. Yes, I agree with you that sometimes people nominate articles for deletion because they disagree with them, and this is fine as long as the reason that they disagree with them is due to the fact that they violate polices and so on. However, it's not okay just because they may go against ones religious beliefs which is why I felt that Christianrocker90 nominated the South Park article for deletion. Just wanted to clarify that for you before I went to bed. :) Cheers, Lauryn☆ 08:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Fr33kman! How are you getting on with The Brothers Karamazov?
I've just made a WikiProject about literature, and I thought maybe you'd like to join (I was quite impressed by your high-quality criticism of CR90's Tragic Love Story ^-^), because you're so good at things about literature. I love books, but I'm not very clever at them. If you're too busy right now, that's okay, too. Well, I wish you every felicitious end with your current request for oversightship, and God bless! Yours sincerely, Classical EstherLibrary 09:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Email is slow, can we realtime for a sec? :) NonvocalScream (talk) 05:25, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Congratulations on reaching the numbers for OS - I think you will be a great asset to the team. My oppose had nothing to do with any concerns about you, so I am glad to to be the first to say congratulations. --Peterdownunder (talk) 09:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(<--) No issues whatsoever! I know you guys trust me, and I agree with some of your concerns, but thanks for the comments anyway! :) fr33kman 09:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
┌─────────────────────────────────┘ He doesn't have OS yet (though he probably will have it pretty soon). There isn't much OS work either today, it seems. ;)
Hello, dear Fr33kman! I'm so glad you joined my WikiProject; I'm sure you'll be a really big help! I'm so happy that you're enjoying The Brothers Karamazov; I finally persuaded my sister Belinda to begin reading it a few days ago, and, to her surprise, she found it addictive and read it several hours straight. I don't know why, but she says that Fyodor Karamazov is "sweet" and "cute", and feels "sorry for him". Huh. :p Well, thank you for replying! I was a bit afraid you might be annoyed at me for "advertising" my WikiProject and that you were politely restraining yourself from slapping me with a trout. ^^ Well, God bless, and happy editing! Classical Esther♣ 23:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats. Your request was successful and Leinad granted you the permission. If you need any advice, feel free to ask me. Please subscribe the mailing list. Have fun Barras talk 22:17, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As one of our more active checkusers, there is a discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_checkuser#Justification for checks that you may be interested in participating in. Cheers, Lauryn (u • t • c) 00:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
When you get a chance, please add yourself to the mailing list and email me to confirm the address. Thanks. EVula // talk // ☯ // 06:39, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This weeks interview is with Nifky?.
Click here for Nifky?'s interview!
you will have a message waiting for you on memoserv on IRC.-- † CR90 13:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You presence is missed.. :) Basically, I've not seen you around often. Hope everything is good. Best, NonvocalScream (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please get on IRC :S -- † CR90 04:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This week, there are two interviews, with Bsadowski1 and CR90.
Click here for Bsadowski1's interview!
Click here for CR90's interview!
The Commanders's Choice. For every edition, Yottie or Pmlineditor will be chosing articles that need creating, expanding or being attended to. Here is this edition's list:
we need to talk privately.-- † CR90 02:03, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously? Remorse is going to clear a repeat offender? He is only remorseful that he got blocked. -DJSasso (talk) 12:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
However we disagree on an editorial level, know that I respect you as a fellow colleague on this project. I think you do good work here, and I appreciate what you do. Best, Jon@talk:~$ 04:45, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
en:Wikipedia:Credo accounts. If your interested, Hurry. Just specify :simple:User... if your using simple as your eligibility. Slots are almost gone, if your a heavy content editor, you can use this. Best, Jon@talk:~$ 23:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This week, there are two interviews, with Classical Esther and Peterdownunder.
Click here for Classical Esther's interview!
Click here for Peterdownunder's interview!
PmlineditorBot (report errors) 11:24, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This week our interview is with Jamesofur.
Click here for Jamesofur's interview!
The Commanders' Choice. For every edition, Yottie or Pmlineditor will be chosing articles that need creating, expanding or being attended to. Here is this edition's list:
I have watched al three films and read all three novelizations. What is your point? The characters are credited in the movies as I left them. 190.10.0.121 (talk) 07:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for telling me. I thought it was just an innocent new user getting confused by a bot error. :p Thank goodness there is someone so much cleverer than me to find those things out. Classical Esther♣ 04:25, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
With more than 18 months service to the Simple English Wikipedia, and more than double the required number of edits, I am happy to present this book, for you to read and enjoy. There is also a ribbon, or a medal if you prefer.Peterdownunder (talk) 04:39, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]