France is a country divided in 'régions' and 'départements'
This article used to be a good article. It was promoted on 21 December 2008 and demoted on 19 May 2009. This means the community feels this article was written very well, but is not now. You may see the vote that promoted the article here. You may see the vote that demoted the article here.
A fact from France appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 5 November 2008.
Wikipedia
A fact from France appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 3 June 2009.
Wikipedia
A fact from France appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 26 July 2009.
Wikipedia
A fact from France appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on August 4, 2010.
Wikipedia
France is a country divided in 'régions' and 'départements'
I noticed this was written as on the page. This may be interesting to know, but it probably won't mean much to a reader unless they know the English equivalents of these words. I'm not French and I don't know the language, but if someone does know the English equivalents, please add them to the article. Nechayev22:28, 13 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
Reply
I'm French, so I understand these words. They are administrative divisions of France and, as far as I know, there is no English equivalent.
Rogue link
Latest comment: 19 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In there interwiki links, there very first link to en: is a rogue one i do not find. Please remove it if you do --Eptalon16:22, 3 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
Hi. I wish to make a note here that while I agree basically with the nomination of this article to Good Article Status, there are some things which need changing on it, or pages creating explaining what these things are. Many users expecting simple English, are going to have difficulty working out what an "arondissement" is without a page explaining it (as has been done with Cantons and Communes), likewise with régions and départements as has been already mentioned, and the description of Corsica as a "collectivité territoriale".
Some of the language requires simplification, even though it is in English already; Monarchy, regime, metropolitan, moralists, prolific, varied and sovereignty are just some of those needing doing.
Also, some of the words have more than one meaning and these need disambiguating (splitting up into different descriptions to make them clearer.) Words like "Suspended", "Executed" and "influenced".
If these issues can be addressed, I believe this article stands a good chance of making it to GA.
In addition to the language issues note above by Iceflow, there are issues with referencing - I think we need to have more references which link to current data. The section on religion for example has assertions with no citations and a reference to a 2005 poll leads to a dead link. --Matilda (talk) 23:19, 10 November 2008 (UTC)Reply
"Here is the country on a map of the world." I would rephrase. There are two maps here as well, one tiny and virtually useless one of the world, and one, much larger, of Europe and North Africa.
The History section ends abruptly before we get to 1900. Missing some significant portions of French histroy... Where are the First and Second World Wars, for instance?
If linking both then they should link to, at the very least, different sections of the same article. Even better, a different article for each link. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
"This is more than in any other European country." prove it.
This is just not a Simple sentence. Firstly I would add "in the constitution" either at the beginning or end of this sentence. Secondly, the complex terms like "indivisible", "secular", "democratic", "social" and "Republic" could use linking. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
"359,000 military personnel in France" - do you mean France has a manpower of 359,000? Presumably they are not all in France, e.g. some of them are abroad in warzones?
"It consequently created rivalry the UK and limited the influence of newly inducted East European nations" - first part of the sentence doesn't make sense, and is "limited of the influence of newly inducted" Simple?
ould be nice if you got the rest, so I can fix to :). I also need to do the refs, but they'll come later. Also, I have asked a few questions on some of the points, as I wasn't sure, mind looking? Yotcmdr=talk to the commander=18:21, 7 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Problems part II
Latest comment: 16 years ago24 comments5 people in discussion
"France is ranked as the eighth largest economy in the world by Gross domestic product (GDP) adjusted for purchasing power parity which takes into account how much it costs to live in different countries and inflation rates." is a very long and quite complicated sentence. I don't think you need "adjusted for purchasing power parity" either, just the explanation following it.
"This made France the smallest producer of carbon dioxide among the seven most industrialized countries in the world." - prove it, and industrialised, not z, to keep this in British English, per the rest of the article.
"French used to be the language of diplomacy and culture in Europe around 17th - 19th century." - prove it and I'd say "between the 17th and 19th Century".
"Each writer used his own spelling and grammar." I don't believe this really... I think I know what you're saying but it isn't clear and I think this statement is probably misleading.
"During the 17th century Pierre Corneille, Jean Racine and Molière's plays and Blaise Pascal and René Descartes's books influenced the aristocracy. They also influenced future authors." prove it.
"France is the first tourist destination in the world." some claim - prove it.
Too many images, clutters up the end of the article.
"They are in Paris, the capital of France. " repetitive. Just add "... both in Paris" to the end of the preceding sentence. Done--ChenzwTalk14:34, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
References
I want to see accessdates on those references.
8 external links is way over the top here. Pick the most significant couple.
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I'd say this section needs special attention, over & above the comments by Rambling Man. As an unashamed fan of France (the country), I would expect to see sections on Art (painting, sculpture), Cuisine, Wine (how could you leave that out?). Section on language could certainly be improved. Political sections suffer from a lack of perspective; they tend to be lists of events without much interpretation. There's room for some reflection on the enormous consequencies of her involvement in the Napoleonic, Franco-German, and two world wars. Comparisons with differing political methods in neighbouring countries might help. There's no doubt France is a most distinctive country with its own style of life. That doesn't quite come over in the article at present. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
Hey Yots, a very well written article you proposed there, hmm? :p I found a few obvious flaws which you probably know and did not fix on purpose or because you didn't have enough time. Well, anyway, here goes!
ref 1 should be simplified or linked: words such as territories, excludes, suspended are all rather complex.
"Carolingian", "French Constitution", "EDF", "subsidies", and "24 Hours of Le Mans" are all red links. It would be nice if fixed. :)
In the section "Cuisine", actually there is no main article called "French cuisine", so it appears to be a useless template. It would be great if you could make the article or, if you can't, just take out the template.
"Bordeaux", "Burgundy", "Beaujolais", "banquets", "Choucroute", "Quiche", "Cassoulet", and "Tapenade" are all red links.
That's it so far, I review'd most of the article. I'll finish my review if I can find anything else to fix later, once these are all adressed - and I'll also try to fix them myself as well. :) Thank you, Belletête-à-tête06:39, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
GA review
Latest comment: 16 years ago13 comments4 people in discussion
The first para in the "Geography and climate" section is unsourced.
"...and telecommunications firms (as it owns big companies like SNCF, EDF)" <-- If EDF is a redlink, at least tell us what is the function of the company.
The Literature section needs sources (all three paragraphs)
Same with sports really "The Tour de France cycling race in July is one of the best-known sporting events", "France is also famous for its 24 Hours of Le Mans car race." <-- these need sources.
The main article in the cuisine section is redlinked. Remove it please.
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
Hi. User:TeleComNasSprVen removed some images, as he thought they were cluttering up the pages (see history for exact wording). I disagree, and would like to revert this, but I would like another opinion on the subject. Thanks, Yottie=talk=22:42, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
I agree with his removals. In my opinion, there were just too many pictures scattered everywhere in the article, and not all of them were necessary in my opinion. Pmlineditor∞13:46, 9 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Incoherent statement on France's area
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In the introduction of the article, it is stated that: "France is the largest country in the European Union and the second largest in Europe"
However, if we only consider France's metropolitan (European) territories, then it is the third largest behind Ukraine and Russia.
And if we consider France's overseas territories, then it is still the third largest as Denmark is bigger due to Greenland.
France's Departments aren't technically overseas territories, think of it as French Guiana is to France as Hawaii is to The US Smoceany2 (talk) 13:37, 17 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
Ethnic groups
Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi ! There is only one source for the whole section, and i can't find in the site any information about the ethnic groups in France. I don't know if this information is false or not, but it is as if it were unsourced. Plus, does the article need this section ? it feels weird to me because in France, we just don't collect this kind of information (to simplify, it's forbidden in France to collect ethnic statistics). I'm sorry if what I am saying is not very clear, English is not my native language. Kaméau (talk) 12:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
From what I see (long history, know France well), and from what is in accordance with fr:France#Immigration, population étrangère et minorités visibles: About one in ten French has at least one non-European parent. Outside the immigrants from other Eu countries, I'd guess the most "visible" group of foreigners are people who immigrated from (the mostly-French-speaking?) countries in North Africa? (The "Mahgreb"). Note that even if their parents immigtated, these people keep many of their customs, which also makes them a taget for racially-motivated violence. I don't want to sound rude, but if the section is needed at all, it should be in line with was the French Wikipedia article says. So, either rewrite to that, or take out all together. Note also: in the timew of the European Union, migration form other EU countries to france shouldn't really be worth mentioning any more. This is of course just my opinion. --Eptalon (talk) 12:37, 25 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Former good article?
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.