Home
Discussion / Help
Subscribing
News
Bug reports
Feature requests
Status
Use this page to report bugs in the reports, such as articles not picked up by AAlertBot, incorrect information, broken links, etc. See How to Report Bugs Effectively for advice on how to write bug reports.
Filled by: H3llkn0wz (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 09:49, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
Link(s):
Comments:
Subst: expensive parser and unneeded templates in archive pages. Some are reaching limit and the load times are high. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:49, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: France3470 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 19:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Link(s): Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation/Article alerts, see the following requested moves:
Comments: Not a bug per se. But I have noticed that for Wikipedia:WikiProject Disambiguation/Article alerts multi-moves involving disambiguation pages don't appear to be picked up. Since such multi-moves are a frequent occurrence for dab article might there be a way for to be changed. Thanks, France3470 (talk) 19:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Czarkoff (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 12:06, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Link(s): any AfD with {{delsort}} substitution
Filled by: Fyunck(click) (talk)
Time filed: 08:58, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Talk:Robert Varga (tennis): Talk:Robert Varga (tennis) – Requested move
Comments: Robert Varga (tennis) was put up for RM (in a multi-move) on August 7. It's August 9 and it has not appeared on article alerts for Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis. Is it slow right now? I'm lucky I noticed it but other tennis editors will miss the ship if it doesn't show up a Tennis Project. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:58, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
{{requested move/dated|multiple=yes}}
@Hellknowz: Fixing this may require a little coordination between us. I looked for your source code, and found that when Community Tech asked to see it, you emailed them. I see above that you start processing RMs by working through Category:Requested moves. But that just gives you the pages requested to be moved; how do you identify the proposed new titles? I assume you read the talk pages in Category:Requested moves to locate the {{Requested move/dated}} template, and parse the move target parameter out of that. The original ArticleAlertbot which was coded in Java ran from September 2008 to April 2010, so it predated the requested moves bots, the first of which began operation in May 2009. As I mentioned above, {{Multimove}} was created in 2006 and from its beginning it added tagged articles to Category:Requested moves. I don't know whether the original Java version supported requested moves, but if it did, it likely would have looked for {{Multimove}} and parsed the move target parameter out of that. However {{Multimove}} was deprecated in August 2009, which inadvertently removed this needed support for the alerts bot. So, if {{Multimove}} support existed in the Java version, it would have been nonfunctional by the time you rewote it for your version of the alerts bot. But, if you didn't know it was nonfunctional, you may have ported the logic anyway. So, can you look to see whether the current code looks for {{Multimove}} as well as {{Requested move/dated}}? If it does, I can just restore that deleted template and update it for the current need to populate Category:Requested moves, and you may not need to update your code at all. If the current version doesn't look for {{Multimove}} then you will need to update your code to support this, and since you would be coding the check from scratch, I may make a new template as a subpage of RMCD bot, as with User:RMCD bot/subject notice that template would be "bot use only" (intended for placement and removal by the bot). Oh, I see you just tagged the documentation, so you may be working on this. wbm1058 (talk) 13:47, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose getting all the pages transcluding User:RMCD bot/subject notice, as Paul suggested, would be another approach to this, but not all RMs may get subject-notice tags. If the page is admin-protected, that notice will only be placed if an admin (likely me) notices and places the tag, since the bot only has template-editor privileges. Also the bot is exclusion compliant (respects {{nobots}}) so an article so tagged will not have a notice of the talk page discussion of its requested move. wbm1058 (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
|multiple=
|new1=
You could just add:
RMCD bot would be responsible for removing User:RMCD bot/multimove from talk pages after the discussion closed. It would work similarly to the automated removal of User:RMCD bot/subject notice from closed discussions. Of course, if the closing administrator removes those without waiting for the bot to do it, that's fine. The bot just saves the closing admins the bother of that task, and ensures that the notices are removed in a timely manner. wbm1058 (talk) 14:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
{{User:RMCD bot/multimove|1=List of Annoying Orange episodes|2=Talk:The Annoying Orange#Requested move 31 March 2019 }}
|1=
{{Requested move/dated|?}}
{{Requested move/dated|new1=?}}
I've implemented the basic code changes for this. I see that on Wikipedia:Requested moves/Article alerts all of these multimoves are listed as undated. Also, it can be hard to track down some of the discussions after they close if the pages are moved, especially in cases where a disambiguation page was involved and there was a change in primary topic. I'd still like to implement improved mechanisms on my end for tracking down these discussions after they've been closed and moved elsewhere. – wbm1058 (talk) 14:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Update now live with (mostly) dated multi-noms. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Sir Sputnik (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 17:10, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Comments: Like the last two times I posted here, articles are being listed several times in the archive for the WikiProject:Football. The first of the two links above is the first duplicate posting in this set, the second is the most recent one. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:10, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Headbomb (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 15:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Link(s): [5]
Comments: For some reason, the bot is missing some dates and for MfDs. Handles group nomination well however. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 15:08, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
For some reason, two TfDs that were closed in March and April are not being removed from Wikipedia:WikiProject Elections and Referendums/Article alerts by the bot. Any ideas why? Number 57 14:28, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 13:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Link(s): [6]
Comments: The bot correctly reports the RFD in the edit summary, but the RFD itself is missing from the reports. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 13:00, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Hellknowz (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 23:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
Link(s): [8][9]
Comments: See also [10] where things don't get archived either. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 17:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
In any case, the underlying issues of undated entries should get fixed. The special handling of undated is basically a workaround. I might make some bug reports for better handling of undated, but I believe I already have them in FRs. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:58, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 09:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
Link(s): Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Article alerts
Comments: The A-class reviews are undated. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:25, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Infobox Shakespearean character was TfD'ed on 29 April (and closed today), but never showed up on WikiProject Shakespeare's alerts page. The template is tagged with the project's banner, and other article alerts have been updated at least as late as 8 April (which is also, apart from this TfD, the last relevant process to affect the project's articles that I'm aware of). I'm also not aware of any changes to the project banner, the project's article alerts subpage, or its subscription. The other WikiProject that has tagged the template also did not get an alert for this TfD so far as I can tell. And I can't immediately spot anything about the format of the TfD itself that might trip up the bot, nor find anything in the public log, and I see it picking up other TfDs today. Anything else I should check before concluding ArticleAlertBot had a hickup somewhere? --Xover (talk) 11:53, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
{{WikiProject Shakespeare|class=Template|importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=template}} {{tfdend|date=29 November 2010|result=no consensus}}
{{WikiProject Fictional characters}}
{{Tfm/dated|page=Infobox Shakespearean character|otherpage=Infobox character|link=Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 29#Template:Infobox Shakespearean character|type=sidebar|help=off|bigbox={{#invoke:Noinclude|noinclude|text=yes}}}}
{{Tfm/dated}}
Fixed next update. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 16:06, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
Fixing next update. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Bradv (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 16:43, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Comments: The bot is creating the article alert for the current RfC, but using the date and author from the previous closed RfC, which is still on the talk page. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Politics, government, and law shows the correct information. – bradv🍁 16:43, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"/\{{2}\s?Rfc(tag)?\s?[^}]*\}{2}(.|\n)*?([0-2]\d):([0-5]\d),\s(\d{1,2})\s(\w*)\s(\d{4})\s\(UTC\)/im"
I'm gonna tag this as unfixable for now, because having multiples of the same workflow on a page is basically impossible for the bot to detect. This happens very rarely and only for stuff like RfC and I can't really justify such a major rework. Unfortunately that means a rare missing/incorrect RfC. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:02, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 23:18, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): See [12], while Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN is relisted.
Comments: And later re-appears... [13]. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:23, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 10:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
FPOC is deprecated, templates are being removed. It was removed from bot's list, but of course it's still being reported with 0 pages.
Anyway, removed in next update. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:22, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, the alert appears to be reporting File:OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg but there is no talk page for any project tags to be on. Keith D (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Files with too many page usages won't be reported next update (although it's probably too late for this one before I can push it). New pages won't get added to workflow list. Old records will get (silently) removed. FFD has a workflow param to limit it to 100. Ideally, it would limit to the number of subscriptions, but that's too much effort for this corner case. It would still (theoretically) report if it the file itself belongs to a project, just not based on its usages. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:44, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 08:17, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): [14]
By design, but it seems there are valid cases like the link. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 08:17, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 10:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): [15] [16]
Not sure why. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Keith D (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 22:05, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): [17]
Comments: The BOT has added 2 "Articles to be merged" entries but for the first of the entries the discussion link is to the incorrect talk page as the discussion is on the talk page of the second entry.
Time filed: 07:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): See [18], which reports Draft:SoftwareX as dated from '25 Jan 2019'. Whereas the current submission's timestamp is 20190728231814 → 28 July 2019. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 07:35, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 10:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): [19]
In the 30 July 2019 report, we had
In the 31 July report, we had
and Archives 2 had
So a few things were. The declined wasn't reported (Draft:Communications Physics), and Draft:Psychreg (moved into mainspace) just disappeared. It probably would a good idea to keep the items in the listing for a few days [1 archive time? 7 days?] after 'closure'. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:11, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 10:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): [20]
Moved to mainspace = promoted. Need to parse talk page banner. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:42, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirected drafts detected and talk page parsed for closure properly, e.g. [21]. Current closed and prematurely archived stuff (#Closure date based on close date) won't appear. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:33, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pages moves to mainspace without placing the banner on talk page don't get closure details. I need to manually parse the move. Might also mention if it's the author moving it (like deprods). — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:21, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 11:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): every other report
Was based on open date. This leads to workflows that are active for more than a week to fall off quicker than archive time. So really old ones got archived instantly. Now using the actual closure date + archive time. Undated will keep using open date + archive time + 7. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 12:22, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): See Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Article alerts#AFC despite the subscription page having |workflows=!AFC
|workflows=!AFC
Filled by: JPG-GR (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 17:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): [22]
Comments: Log linked above has WikiProject Banners incorrectly transcluded instead of (presumably) linking to them, causing the log page itself to appear in Category:WikiProject banners with formatting errors. - JPG-GR (talk) 17:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: ComplexRational (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 23:20, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Comments: I don't understand why the bot continues to report an RfD that has been closed for nearly a month (and reinstates after I manually removed it, though I now suspect it is supposed to do that). Other RfDs have come and gone within that time frame, yet this one remains despite its closure. Is this a normal consequence of the nature of the RfD (e.g. its relisting), or is this a new bug? ComplexRational (talk) 23:20, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Czar (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 14:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): Special:PermanentLink/924018773
Comments: The "Anarcho-tyranny" merge discussion is still marked as open when it has been closed for a while. Perhaps it has something to do with how the merge target includes a specific section title or how the discussion closure template seems non-standard? Wanted to flag for you either way. Thanks! czar 14:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 04:58, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): [26]
Comments: The two RFD links have a #<1> for anchor, rather than #Online_journal_of_biological_sciences for anchor. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 04:58, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
#<1>
#Online_journal_of_biological_sciences
Filled by: Jmar67 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 10:05, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
Link(s): Wikipedia_talk:Article_alerts#Missing_parens
Comments: The edit summary is missing a closing parenthesis at the end, and the one before the ending "signature" is superfluous. That is, the existing parenthesis is in the wrong place. I reported this earlier on the main talk page. Jmar67 (talk) 10:05, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Original heading was: Banner using redirect is not reported
Filled by: Fayenatic london (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 12:33, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Link(s): Category:Jewish-related television programs nominated 7 Jan, talk page was given the project banner redirect {{WP Judaism}} also on 7 Jan, not yet listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Judaism/Article alerts as of 9 Jan. Compare Category:Jewish engravers by nationality, talk page was given fully-spelled-out {{WikiProject Judaism}} on 5 Jan, & was listed on Alerts on 6 Jan.
Time filed: 09:42, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Link(s): this update (reported Wikipedia_talk:Article_alerts#Misreported_close)
Time filed: 09:59, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
#redirect [[Great_Britain#Language|Languages of the British Isles]]
#REDIRECT [[Banana|Banana (disambiguation)]]
Filled by: Fram (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 08:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
Comments: This bot is making thousands of edits without the bot indicator, flooding recent changes (curiously, a fair number of edits does have the "b" indicating its bot status. Other bots active at the same time don't have this issue. I also notice that this bot erratically indicates its changes as minor or not, without apparent rhyme or reason to it. This as well should probably be consistent, but is less urgent than the "bot edit" indicator. Fram (talk) 08:20, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Chrisspurgeon (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 17:24, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Link(s): Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Article alerts
Comments: On the page for Project Birds at [[28]] Central Park Birding Incident is still listed as an article for creation, but the page has been created and exists at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Park_birdwatching_incident . Maybe the problem is that the draft capitalized Birding and Incident, while in the live article they are lower case? I'm kind of a newbie when it comes to anything but basic editing, and don't know how to fix this. Thanks!
Chrisspurgeon (talk) 17:24, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 10:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
Link(s): [29]
The ones that are "The result was moved to Draft:Katie Ascough." Probably need to detect Draft and make sure the result isn't to move the page, which is a different one. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 10:23, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Eagles247 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 17:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)
Link(s): [30] [31]
Comments: Changed Sam Bradford GA nomination by user Lucky7jrk to Eagles247 (I didn't nominate it) in the first diff, and in the second diff attributes a new AFC submission to me again when instead it was nominated by Theviking87. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: NatureBoyMD (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 13:39, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Link(s):https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_29&oldid=981012030
Comments: Ten templates were added to TFD in a single entry, but they did not show up on Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Article alerts despite being tagged with {{WikiProject Baseball}}.
TfDs should work again. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 11:19, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Empire AS (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 08:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
Link(s): WP:LPL/AA
Hi, recently I added a shortcut template in WP:LPL/AA. However after adding it, the bot stopped to update the alerts. Then I reverted my edit to make it run but still it is not working. Please make it run. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 08:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Mujinga (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 22:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Link(s): Wikipedia:WikiProject Squatting/Article alerts, Silvio Meier
Hiya at Wikipedia:WikiProject Squatting/Article alerts the DYK for Silvio Meier is still showing as nominated on 25 November but in actual fact it's already been approved and mainpaged on 11 December. Not a biggie but I thought I'd flag it up since I can't work out why it's happening. Thanks and best wishes for 2021! Mujinga (talk) 22:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: The Earwig (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 23:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Link(s): Special:Permalink/1001592825#AFC
Comments: As reported here, many AfC drafts are being marked as undated, but as far as I can tell, they are timestamped and categorized correctly. For example, Draft:Rob Tasker is in Category:AfC submissions by date/23 December 2020 but is listed as undated at Wikipedia:WikiProject Film/Article alerts#AFC. — The Earwig talk 23:10, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Aza24 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 10:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Link(s): [33]
Comments: The "Good topic candidates" (and likely the "Featured topic candidates") "discussion" link does not work since Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates was recently moved to Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates. Just needs to be updated for the bot, I think. Aza24 (talk) 10:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 16:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Link(s): https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Television/Article_alerts&diff=1014690866&oldid=1014641870
Filled by: A7V2 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 10:52, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Lewis Hamilton was closed as speedy keep as the nomination was withdrawn, and shortly after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of career achievements by Lewis Hamilton (2nd nomination) was opened (a second AfD for the same article). On both Wikipedia:WikiProject Motorsport/Article alerts and Wikipedia:WikiProject Formula One/Article alerts there is only a link for the first AfD. SSSB corrected this ([34], [35]) but this was overwritten in the bot's next update to the pages, with no mention of the new AfD ([36], [37]). A7V2 (talk) 10:52, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Hurricane Noah (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 22:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Link(s): Wikipedia:WikiProject Weather/Article alerts
Comments: The page is showing articles that are not under WP Weather. NoahTalk 22:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Appears someone else added it. I removed it. NoahTalk 21:29, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(also, bot bug reporting doesn't auto-fill the section header ... perhaps take a lesson from User talk:Citation bot?)
Filled by: Trappist the monk (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 16:39, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Link(s): diff and diff
Comments: Bot created broken {{hover title}} and {{cite web}} templates; the latter breakage added Wikipedia:WikiProject_Azerbaijan, Wikipedia:WikiProject_Azerbaijan/Article_alerts, Wikipedia:WikiProject_Cities, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities/Article alerts to Category:CS1 errors: archive-url.
{{hover title}}
{{cite web}}
And continues to produce broken {{hover title}} and {{cite web}} templates: diff and diff
—Trappist the monk (talk) 14:12, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is there anyone out there? Please fix this bot.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 12:26, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Q28 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 15:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Link(s):https://enwp.org/w/index.php?title=User:AAlertBot/Sandbox_article_alert&diff=prev&oldid=1030522247
Comments: The robot replaced <ref>{{ with &lt;ref&gt;&amp;#123;&amp;#123; .--q28 (talk) 15:27, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 09:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Link(s): Wikipedia:WikiProject Judaism/Article alerts
Comments: The Discuss link in the first merge template on Yahweh is Talk:Yahweh#Merger proposal. However, AAlertBot ignores this and incorrectly uses Talk:Yahwism instead.
(This instance might be fixable by using {{Merge from}} instead of {{Merge}}, but that is not my point; the bot should copy the Discuss link that is in the merge template.) – Fayenatic London 09:54, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Filled by: Sod25 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 23:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Link(s): requested move at The Championships, Wimbledon, WikiProject Tennis alert page
Comments: I requested a move of numerous Wimbledon-related articles on the Wimbledon talk page, but not the Wimbledon article itself. Article alerts claims I did include the Wimbledon page in the request. Sod25 (talk) 23:27, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The last paragraph in WP:RMPM says
|current1=Current title of page 1
I wasn't keen on allowing this, knowing it could potentially cause support headaches, but others kept asking for it. – wbm1058 (talk) 19:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If it wasn't in the category, then it would also skip the other pages.
{{{current1}}}
Filed by: Cat's Tuxedo (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 17:05, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Link(s): Diff
Comments: The bot is saving links to discussions on Featured/Good Topic candidates as "Featured topic candidates" rather than "Featured and good topic candidates", resulting in a red-link. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Filed by: Hellknowz (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 18:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Link(s): reprot page alerts
Filed by: LaundryPizza03 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 07:50, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Link(s): [40]
Comments: At Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Article alerts, AAlertBot (talk · contribs) erroneously added an undated MfD alert for Category:Physics articles by quality, which has no MfD tag or discussion page, and is outside the scope of MfD. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:50, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 07:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
Link(s): [41]
Comments: On Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics/Article alerts, an RfD for the Wiktionary redirect ≬ (a pair of parentheses that overlap each other) returns a blank wikilink instead of wikt:≬. The target is included in the template {{Wiktionary redirect}}. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:42, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Special:Interwiki can be useful here. However, it's probably simpler to simply left-pad everything with leading :, i.e. ≬, Article under discussion, etc... 08:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
≬
Article under discussion
Time filed: 10:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Link(s): https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Article_alerts&oldid=1110743237#RfD
— HELLKNOWZ ∣ TALK 10:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Filed by: Plastikspork (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 01:04, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Link(s): this edit
Comments: Creating links to Template:Digital subchannel is not helpful. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 01:04, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Filed by: Jonesey95 (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 17:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
Link(s): Diff showing insertion of Template:Hover title on 30 Sep 2022
Comments: Per this January 2021 TFD, {{Hover title}} is being replaced by {{Tooltip}}. With respect to migrating from Hover title to Tooltip, the only meaningful difference in syntax between the templates is that parameters |1= and |2= are swapped.
|2=
An easy fix is to replace {{Hover title|text of first unnamed parameter... with {{Tooltip|2=text of first unnamed parameter... as shown in this diff. Pinging Hellknowz and Headbomb; I hope this is an easy fix.
{{Hover title|text of first unnamed parameter...
{{Tooltip|2=text of first unnamed parameter...
Note: I think that this explicit naming of the text parameter could fix the errors reported by Trappist the monk above. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Filed by: Ljleppan (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 08:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Comments: The following is inserted inside RfD entries:
<!-- The above content is generated by {{subst:rfd}}. --> <!-- End of RFD message. Don't edit anything above here. Feel free to edit below here, but do NOT change the redirect's target. -->
This causes the entries to split into two lines at that point, with the latter line rendering as a code block. A complete example entry:
* 27 Nov 2022 – '''[[2013-14 Ukraine crisis]]''' <span class=plainlinks><small>([[Talk:2013-14 Ukraine crisis|talk]] · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2013-14_Ukraine_crisis&action=edit edit] · [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2013-14_Ukraine_crisis&action=history hist])</small></span> →[[Russo-Ukrainian War]] was RfDed by [[User:Gliwrit|Gliwrit]] <small>([[User talk:Gliwrit|t]] · [[Special:Contributions/Gliwrit|c]])</small>; see [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 <!-- The above content is generated by {{subst:rfd}}. --> <!-- End of RFD message. Don't edit anything above here. Feel free to edit below here, but do NOT change the redirect's target. --> November 23#2013-14_Ukraine_crisis|discussion]]
-Ljleppan (talk) 08:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
|time=
|timestamp=
|year=
Filed by: Qwerfjkl (talk · contribs)
Time filed:15:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Link(s): Special:Diff/1146180151
Comments: It added
When it was in fact submitted with this edit. My bot only made this earlier edit. — Qwerfjkltalk 15:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Filed by: FusionSub (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 09:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Link(s): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Sussex/Article_alerts
Comments: This page seems to be victim of a bug where the same information gets printed there twice. FusionSub (talk) 09:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Filed by: Headbomb (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 10:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Comments: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic Journals/Journals cited by Wikipedia/Questionable6 is redirected to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academic Journals/Journals cited by Wikipedia, which is tagged with {{WP Journals}}. Shouldn't it get picked up by AALERTS? Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 10:48, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Time filed: 07:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)
Link(s): [42]
Comments: A new alert says that Ricci calculus has been proposed to be merged to itself; the page proposed to be merged is Tensor calculus. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:27, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{mergeto|Ricci calculus|date=June 2023|discuss=Talk:Tensor calculus}}
Time filed: 10:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Comments: The above multi-article AfD remains on WP:FINLAND's AA list despite being closed on 13 November. Perhaps related to the fact that a bunch of IPs kept "closing" the AfD, resulting in an eventual page protection? -Ljleppan (talk) 10:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Filed by: Jähmefyysikko (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 08:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Link(s): [43]
Comments: Mott criterion and Mott transition are proposed to be merged into Mott insulator, but the bot reports that they are to be merged into each other. The page Wikipedia:Merging advices to use {{merge}} template instead of {{merge from}} on the source pages when there are multiple pages to be merged, and this procedure has been followed here. Jähmefyysikko (talk) 08:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
|target=
Filed by: Aviationwikiflight (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 09:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Link(s): Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Article alerts
Comments: On 5 July 2022, [44], a split template was added by a user which was corrected by AnomieBOT [45]. The split proposal was listed on to Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Article alerts. On 15 April 2024 [46], the split template was replaced by a merge proposal and the WikiProject Alert page has not been correctly updated to display a merge proposal and has kept the split proposal. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 09:21, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Filed by: Xoontor (talk · contribs)
Time filed: 22:00, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Link(s): Special:Diff/1275480271, Special:Diff/1275480850
Comments: In the two diffs I provided, the bot mistakenly labeled me as the submitter of this draft, even though the draft was actually submitted by someone else (see Special:Diff/1275415708). Xoontor (talk) 22:00, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]