User talk:Wi168

Next steps

User talk:Wi168

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regenerative Purpose (August 9)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Theroadislong, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Regenerative Purpose to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Theroadislong (talk) 07:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
I understand. I am the author of this book, so of course since I have retained the IP there is not a lot of detailed public information on it, that is not from me, or quoting me, or interviewing me. The reason that I wanted to submit this article is that I see AI summaries of my work surfacing that are not crediting me as the original creator of this framework, even though I published the book in 2019 long before AI existed, and own the domain name on it. I am not sure how else to claim authorship without having my work completely consumed and erased by AI. I have a dozen podcast interviews, several online summits, and two independent publishing awards. I am not on CNN, as an independent author. So I am not sure how else to prove my authorship of this book, and not let AI take my work without credit. ~2026-43756-18 (talk) 07:36, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Wi168!

Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article.

Need help?

  • To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.
I understand. I am the author of this book, so of course since I have retained the IP there is not a lot of detailed public information on it, that is not from me, or quoting me, or interviewing me. The reason that I wanted to submit this article is that I see AI summaries of my work surfacing that are not crediting me as the original creator of this framework, even though I published the book in 2019 long before AI existed, and own the domain name on it. I am not sure how else to claim authorship without having my work completely consumed and erased by AI. ~2026-43756-18 (talk) 07:32, 9 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Regenerative Purpose (August 11)

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection
The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:
advertisement for a non-notable subject

Next steps

Scam warning

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:54, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.