User talk:Untae

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Perso AI Dubbing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:59, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for reviewing the submission and for the detailed feedback.

I understand the current references do not demonstrate sufficient independent,

in-depth coverage. I am actively working to obtain coverage from international

tech media outlets before resubmitting.

Could I ask for guidance — would coverage from sources such as TechCrunch,

VentureBeat, or similar English-language technology publications qualify as

appropriate secondary sources under Wikipedia's notability criteria?

I appreciate your time and patience. Untae (talk) 05:39, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Untae! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 11:59, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Perso AI Dubbing. Thanks! guninvalid (talk) 05:05, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nil NZ was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There are some statements that appear hallucinated, or are not entirely supported by the cited source. For example, none of the sources say "33 languages", & source [3] doesn't mention MP4's etc. Other likely AI tells include the promotional tone, list formatting (instead of prose), and random mark-up. Please resubmit the draft, without the use of an LLM.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Perso AI Dubbing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nil ^nz 05:19, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

GPTZero says highly confident this text was 100% AI generated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Perso AI Dubbing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Draft rejected
Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted.

Reason for rejection

The reviewer, Bonadea, left the following feedback:

The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion.

No independent sources, no claim to notability.

Next steps

• If you have discovered significant new sources or believe this rejection was an error, you may ask the reviewer to reconsider on their talk page.
• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

bonadea contributions talk 19:37, 8 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thank you for disclosing your conflict of interest and paid editing. Since you've identified yourself as working for a software company that deals with AI, I recommend you review Wikipedia's policies regarding LLM use: WP:LLM, WP:EPAI, and WP:AITALK. This is just for your own reference in case you weren't aware of them. Thank you – Kodning 🌸 (talk) 01:11, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello Kodning, thank you for the pointer and for taking the time to leave the notice. I've reviewed WP:LLM, WP:EPAI, and WP:AITALK.

For full transparency: my COI and paid-editing disclosure was made at the start, and I will not be using LLM-generated text in any future submission. The previous drafts were declined and ultimately rejected primarily on notability grounds — independent in-depth secondary coverage of Perso AI Dubbing simply does not exist in sufficient volume in English-language reliable sources at this point.

Given that, I have no plans to resubmit until I can point to multiple independent, in-depth pieces in established outlets. I'll re-engage AfC only when those sources clearly exist. Thanks again for the courteous heads-up.

Untae (talk) Untae (talk) 02:44, 28 May 2026 (UTC)Reply