This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia:Notability (people) § Crime victims and perpetrators. Shortcut WP:ORGINDWP:ORGIND A primary test of notability is whether unrelated people with no vested...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH. Although there are 35 references quotes in the article, most fail WP:ORGIND as they rely on quotations and facts from the company or its officers. The...
Click to read more »the company, fails WP:ORGIND This from American INNO is based entirely on an interview with the CEO/co-founder. Fails WP:ORGIND This from D Magazine is...
Click to read more »interview style where the founder can say pretty much anything and fail WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS. The others in the list are routine and trivial announcement of...
Click to read more »from the company, fails WP:ORGIND This from Business Standard] is based on a statement/PR from the company, fails WP:ORGIND. This from Business Standard...
Click to read more »all fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. This from Bytemarks Café podcast and this one are based on interviewing company execs, fails WP:ORGIND, This Entrepreneur...
Click to read more »information provided by the company, fails WP:ORGIND Tech Republic interview with company founders fails WP:ORGIND Life Hacker review of the product doesn't...
Click to read more »is WP:NCORP with special attention to references wrt WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Can you link to any of the references you believe meet the criteria for...
Click to read more »fails ORGIND This from entrepreneur.com is based on a funding announcement and quotes from the founder, has no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND This...
Click to read more »ORGIND This from LiveMint is based on a company announcement, fails ORGIND Not a single reference contains any "Independent Content" (as per ORGIND)...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND. This from IndianExpress is based on this Press Release from the company. Same date. Note the use of the word "we" throughout. Fails WP:ORGIND...
Click to read more »released as part of the "survey". Fails WP:ORGIND for the same reasons. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. It's a regurgitated company announcement, no...
Click to read more »Release/Anouncement fails WP:ORGIND, 2 - Press Release/Anouncement fails WP:ORGIND, 3 - Press Release/Anouncement fails WP:ORGIND.— Preceding unsigned comment...
Click to read more »and therefore fails WP:ORGIND. This from The Helm is likewise based entirely on an interview with the founders and fails ORGIND. This from Norwest is a...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND as they are either based on a company announcement or based on an interview. All of the information originates from company sources. ORGIND requires...
Click to read more »"Independent Content", fails ORGIND Billboard article also based entirely off an interview, no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND Coveteur article based entirely...
Click to read more »announcement, no "Independent Content", fails WP:ORGIND HomeCare Magazine is a press release, fails WP:ORGIND Bizjournals is based entirely on a company announcement...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND as follows: This htrnews.com article is derived from this press release and is therefore not intellectually independent and fails WP:ORGIND. The...
Click to read more »required by ORGIND. Here are five other articles all from the same time period, all regurgitating the same information. These references fail ORGIND This in...
Click to read more »Content, fails WP:ORGIND. Atlanta magazine reference is based entirely on an interview with the founder, no Independent Content, fails ORGIND QZ reference...
Click to read more »and ORGIND. The CNBC reference relies entirely on an Squawk Box interview and other quotes from the CEO, has no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND. Finally...
Click to read more »about itself and appear to be the work of a PR company and would fail WP:ORGIND. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »on discussion with HighKing at Talk:Cue Health... the entity fails at WP:ORGIND. WP:TOOSOON. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion to generate a wider and...
Click to read more »written by a marketing department. Fails WP:ORGIND. This digitalsignagetoday.com article fails WP:ORGIND as it is based on a company announcement in relation...
Click to read more »independent. Fails WP:ORGIND. This follow-up reference repeats information provided by a company announcement and also fails WP:ORGIND. This third reference...
Click to read more »references meet the criteria for establishing notability (most fail WP:ORGIND) and are not intellectually independent as per WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 10:14...
Click to read more »fails WP:ORGIND This from FSR is entirely based on an announcement by their business partner, therefore is not independent, fails WP:ORGIND This from...
Click to read more »independent and fails WP:ORGIND. The fortune.com reference relies on an interview with the CEO and an investor and therefore also fails WP:ORGIND. Thie fastcodesign...
Click to read more »at ll. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND This from CBS Denver is based on an interview with the CEO. Fails WP:ORGIND This from Times-Call is based on a...
Click to read more »references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 14:51, 31 May 2018 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »fails WP:ORGIND This BBC article is also churnalism, relies entirely on interview and information provided by the company, fails WP:ORGIND This from...
Click to read more »sources to establish notability - the others are WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. ORGIND requires "Independent Content" in order to count towards establishing...
Click to read more »announcement and fails WP:ORGIND. The Gamingintellegence.com reference is based on this company announcement, fails WP:ORGIND. The Gaming Business reference...
Click to read more »co-founder/CEO. Fails both WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND This corporate profile is a PRIMARY source as per here, fails ORGIND This from Malay Mail discusses the opening...
Click to read more »interviews and information fails WP:ORGIND section of the WP:NCORP guidelines. All three of those references fail WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 20:30, 16 December...
Click to read more »reference is a press release (fails WP:ORGIND). Thie straight.com reference is based on a company announcement (fails WP:ORGIND). This financialpost.com reference...
Click to read more »Content and it fails WP:ORGIND. WKO reference is a standard directory entre with information provided by the company, fails WP:ORGIND Payment & Banking reference...
Click to read more »References either rely on interviews/quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND) or mentions-in-passing (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or are from publications with...
Click to read more »sources or interviews with founders, thereby failing WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 11:45, 28 May 2018 (UTC) Delete-Concur...Interviews of the founder...
Click to read more »The references fail to provide "Independent Content". Fails ORGIND. Also failing ORGIND for the same reasons are this PR from the "Millenium Cities Initiative"...
Click to read more »Shellwood (talk) 07:26, 16 October 2019 (UTC) Delete fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. A mix of paid for marketing content.scope_creepTalk 12:20, 16 October 2019...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP: This interview with Matthew Carl Earl, an employee, fails WP:ORGIND as articles relying almost entirely on interviews are not considered (intellectually)...
Click to read more »demonstrating the software in a classic piece of PR. Both of them fail WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 15:17, 29 November 2022 (UTC) How? I don't believe the...
Click to read more »Content", fails ORGIND WSJ and CCJ articles are based entirely on an announcement of funding, no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND VentureBeat article...
Click to read more »founder and fails WP:ORGIND This Tech Shohor reference is classic churnalism (mostly a profile on the founder) and fails WP:ORGIND This Manobkantha reference...
Click to read more »officer of the company, failing WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH This from Northstar Meetings Group is covered above, fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH Relisted to...
Click to read more »23:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC) Can you point to any references that meet WP:ORGIND, specifically those with "Independent Content"? HighKing++ 21:35, 6 December...
Click to read more »with Taylor, fails ORGIND Rebellious reference is entirely based on an interview with Kellie Taylor the founder - fails WP:ORGIND. Chicago Mag reference...
Click to read more »executives. There is no "Independent Content" and therefore reference fails WP:ORGIND criteria. Business Insider (also mentioned above by Banjosound and Pegnawl)...
Click to read more »with WP:CORPDEPTH. And fails WP:ORGIND. Let me elaborate more on references. PitchBook: Press Release. fails WP:ORGIND Forbes: Can consider ey.com: Again...
Click to read more »company*. The references are based on company announcements and fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. This from USA Today, this from CNBC and this from The...
Click to read more »and ORGIND This from Business Wire is a standard routine Press Release, fails ORGIND This from M.net is a standard routine Press Release, fails ORGIND Each...
Click to read more »TWL) Delete No indications of notability, reference don't exist or fail WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 22:43, 15 July 2018 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. This from Financial News is based on a company announcement, fails WP:ORGIND This Business Insider article is...
Click to read more »review. No indication of being notable. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 10:22, 23 December 2022 (UTC) Delete Much too soon, hardly...
Click to read more »the company and has no Independent Content (as per ORGIND). This is churnalism and fails WP:ORGIND The CBS Baltimore reference is a mention-in-passing...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP and especially the section on "Independent Content" as per WP:ORGIND. Also be aware of WP:NOTINHERIT. If you still believe there are references...
Click to read more »with the founders (a "puff profile") with no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND. Techcrunch comes with a health warning for notability - WP:TECHCRUNCH -...
Click to read more »important - it must be in-depth (WP:CORPDEPTH and have "Independent Content" WP:ORGIND. Having read the references, none of the ones in the article meet the criteria...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGCRIT. Refs mix of press releases and event, conferences...
Click to read more »and/or WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 14:05, 31 January 2018 (UTC) You appear to have misunderstood WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Nowhere...
Click to read more »sources where the company (the owner) talks it about itself - this fails WP:ORGIND; descriptions of trivial routine business-as-usual coverage such as increase...
Click to read more »fails WP:ORGIND. The second is also based on an interview and fails ORGIND. The third is based on an announcement/interview, fails ORGIND. The fourth...
Click to read more »are Inc5000 company. Passes Wiki criteria for notability. WP:ORGCRITE WP:ORGIND WP:CORPDEPTH Expertwikiguy (talk) 2:40 12 January 2018 (UTC) Comment Perhaps...
Click to read more »Independent Content, fails WP:ORGIND This from BusinessTech is entirely based on a company announcement and fails WP:ORGIND This also from BusinessTech...
Click to read more »must be attributable to a source unconnected with the company (as per WP:ORGIND). This from the Economic Times is a mere mention in passing with a quote...
Click to read more »the CEO, fails ORGIND. Also provided no in-depth information on the company, fails CORPDEPTH Yahoo is a company announcement, fails ORGIND Asian Age is...
Click to read more »think there will always be room for participants on the film side Fails WP:ORGIND as interview style article. Ref 2 [2] Paywall. Ref 3 Investing in Hollywood’s...
Click to read more »anything significant or in-depth about the company, fails both NCORP and ORGIND. This from STAT news as well as this from the San Diego Union Tribune are...
Click to read more »Content". Fails WP:ORGIND. The ashaeq.com reference is a video of an interview with a co-founder. No "Independent Content", fails WP:ORGIND. This from webrazzi...
Click to read more »TWL) Delete None of the references contain Independent Content, failing WP:ORGIND. A BEFORE search shows that the company exists but I am unable to locate...
Click to read more »fails ORGIND This Hindau article is also based entirely on an announcement of plans to raise funding, no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND This Hindu...
Click to read more »Dept of State (fails ORGIND), and the angel.co reference is a job advert by the company that includes its own description (fails ORGIND). The AARP reference...
Click to read more »posted by Chumpih above do not meet WP:SIRS as claimed. SIRS references WP:ORGIND which requires "Independent Content" that is original and independent opinion...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Run of the mill org. Fails WP:ORGIND with routine press coverage. scope_creep (talk) 08:37, 23 February 2018...
Click to read more »no Independent Content, fails WP:ORGIND. The 3rd is entirely based on this company announcement, also fails WP:ORGIND. The 4th relies on quotations and...
Click to read more »provided by the company and the CEO, fails ORGIND. An Interview with the CEO is not "Independent Content", fails ORGIND. Blog posts are not reliable sources...
Click to read more »significant coverage. WP:CORPDEPTH - in-depth information *on the company* WP:ORGIND - "Independent Content" which in order to count towards establishing notability...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:ORGIND. Lack WP:SIGCOV. Most of the references are WP:ROUTINE. Hence, calling for...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:DEL14. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH specifically. scope_creepTalk 09:39, 27 November 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »(fails WP:ORGIND), profiles in Crunchbase/Forbes/Bloomberg (fails WP:ORGCRIT) advertorial profiles such as Entrepreneur.com (fails WP:ORGIND) and company...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. The few trivial coverage that exist is related to VC funding or mention...
Click to read more »forth why any given reference meets the criteria set forth in CORPDEPTH, ORGIND, of generically, GNG. Therefore by strength of argument I judge consensus...
Click to read more »the founders.Fails WP:SIRS, WP:ORGIND. Not independent. Ref 2 [2] Interview with the founder. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:ORGIND. Not independent. Ref 3 [3] Techcrunch...
Click to read more »opinion and most references are based on company announcements, fails WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 20:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Sources do not meet WP:ORGIND, topic is therefore not notable. No significant coverage in reliable sources...
Click to read more »content thereby failing WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. The Napa Valley Register article can be seen here - still fails ORGIND. I've also nominated the related...
Click to read more »article. The problem for me is the same ORGIND issue that plagues the Apple Daily source above. If not for the ORGIND issue, I would say this one counts....
Click to read more »company, also fails WP:ORGIND. This from Times Now News is based on the same announcement as the previous reference and fails WP:ORGIND for the same reasons...
Click to read more »and WP:ORGIND. This newspaper article contains a quote from the Kingston weekend manager, it is not intellectually independent and fails WP:ORGIND. It also...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP: This interview with Matthew Carl Earl, an employee, fails WP:ORGIND as articles relying almost entirely on interviews are not considered (intellectually)...
Click to read more »Nation sources in this articles are PR or based on PR and therefore fail WP:ORGIND. The indicator for this are phrases as follows which show close alignment...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND The VentureBeat article is likewise based on an interview with Wu, the CEO and information provided by the company. Also fails WP:ORGIND. This...
Click to read more »"according to SEC filings", so does not provide sufficient WP:CORPDEPTH or WP:ORGIND to support notability, because it is essentially a press release. The second...
Click to read more »their execs so also fails WP:ORGIND. Georgeherald reference helpfully marks the article as an advertorial. So fails WP:ORGIND. If you find anything you believe...
Click to read more »TWL) No indications of notability, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND and fail the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP...
Click to read more »Content, fails WP:ORGIND Globes reference is based on a Press Release from Convertix, has no Independent Content, fails WP:ORGIND. EMERCE reference is...
Click to read more »fails ORGIND and CORPDEPTH NFLPA article is PR, fails ORGIND This TechCrunch article is based on PR, fails ORGIND SBCAmericas is PR, fails ORGIND Gaming...
Click to read more »announcement of moving. Fails WP:ORGIND. * 15 things to know about CareCloud Taken straight from the website. Fails WP:ORGIND. Fails WP:SIRS. * CareCloud Concludes...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. Refs are routine business and operations news scope_creepTalk 13:53, 1...
Click to read more »information, no independent content, fails ORGIND Article in The Book Seller is another interview, fails ORGIND, same reasons Article in Publishing Perspectives...
Click to read more »Primary Source so cannot be used to establish notability. Also fails WP:ORGIND. 2. This from Reinsurance News is entirely based on another company announcement...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND. * Tech Pitch: Doctify Same picture. Fails WP:ORGIND. * Same ref. Same picture. Fails WP:ORGIND. * Same ref. Same picture. Fails WP:ORGIND. *...
Click to read more »fails WP:ORGIND Graced Health blog, fails WP:RS Mindbody Online profile of the founder, all info on the company provided by the founder, fails ORGIND Autism...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND). Similar articles (using the same quotes) can be found at this Verdict reference and this The Global Treasurer reference, fails WP:ORGIND. The...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Some coverage but usual paid effort at promotion. scope_creepTalk...
Click to read more »vote delete. TechnoTalk (talk) 04:06, 17 June 2022 (UTC) Take a look at WP:ORGIND and WP:SIRS. There's also the WP:SERIESA essay too. "Independent of the...
Click to read more »projections. Fails WP:ORGIND. This mixergy article is labelled a "case study" but in actuality, is a video advertisement. Fails WP:ORGIND. Another New Hampshire...
Click to read more »(UTC) Comment Your second point doesn't address the concern. Please see WP:ORGIND. Nobody is saying the sources aren't reliable or that the extracts aren't...
Click to read more »unaffiliated with the company, fails ORGIND This from El Periodico is based entirely on an interview with the founder, fails ORGIND This from Masculin.com is primarily...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND and WP:SIRS. References are PR, funding news, and routine annoucements....
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. For example, the WSJ reference relies on information provided by an affiliated "investment analyst", fails ORGIND. HighKing++ 12:23...
Click to read more »the content, but also means that the *content* must be independent. WP:ORGIND states that references must by "intellectually" independent and that Independent...
Click to read more »generally funding news, interviews and routine business annoucements. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SIRS. UPE. scope_creepTalk 13:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »interpreted WP:ORGIND differently, so I've reviewed again and my interpretation still leads me to believe these sources pass. WP:ORGIND appears to mainly...
Click to read more »that none of the Keep !voters have mentioned WP:ORGIND in their !votes. This is important as ORGIND rules out (for the purposes of establishing notability)...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND WP:SIRS. Announcement of partnership. * Two of Africa's leading boda-hailing startups are backed by same investor Fails WP:ORGIND * [1] Dead...
Click to read more »company announcements and fail WP:ORGIND. The reference in Haaretz is based on an interview with the CEO and fails WP:ORGIND, the Reuters reference is also...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIRS, WP:ORGIND. References are press-releases, PR and routine coverage. Advert by a now...
Click to read more »Response References must contain "Independent Content" (as defined by WP:ORGIND) and this reference fails abysmally. The article relies entirely on an interview...
Click to read more »MBisanz talk 01:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC) Comment Looking at WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND in particular with the references listed by Czar as follows: This WSJ article...
Click to read more »discuss her business" - fails WP:ORGIND. The NJBiz article is a puff piece based on an interview with the CEO, also fails ORGIND. This Crain reference showcasing...
Click to read more »from company sources, fails WP:ORGIND. The reference from nantesmetropole.fr is based on the same event and fails WP:ORGIND for the same reasons. The next...
Click to read more »interviews and fail WP:ORGIND. The CBC reference is based on an interview with Martell with no independent content and fails WP:ORGIND. The Huff Post reference...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND. Topic fails WP:NCORP/GNG. HighKing++ 19:38, 28 August 2020 (UTC) The inc piece has about four paragraphs of prose so does count for WP:ORGIND...
Click to read more »WP:SIGCOV: 100% of the article is on Mr. Coconut, overviewing its history WP:ORGIND: Channel NewsAsia is unaffiliated with Mr. Coconut, neither is the author...
Click to read more »” Kinsel said in an interview. A description of its operation. Fails WP:ORGIND Interview style article. Fails WP:SIRS Reliable but not in-depth. * [1]...
Click to read more »independent and fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. This final reference from ET is based on a company announcement and fails WP:ORGIND. None of the other...
Click to read more »fails WP:ORGIND. This businessdayonline reference is based on this announcement on the website, same wording and phrasing. Fails WP:ORGIND. This dailytrust...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Brochure article. Fails WP:NCORP. PR, Press-releases. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH. scope_creepTalk 20:26, 1 July 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »reference is an announcement and fails on WP:CORPDEPTH. The 2nd ref fails WP:ORGIND. Of the 11 references in the article, 9 of them fail WP:CORPDEPTH as being...
Click to read more »Q&A interview with the founder with no "Independent Content", fails WP:ORGIND. This from BBC News is based on a company announcement, same day as ITV...
Click to read more »fails WP:ORGIND. The Crowd Insiders reference is based on an interview with the founders, is not intellectually independent and fails WP:ORGIND. Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Hi Maltalinks, you need to also take a read of WP:NCORP, especially WP:ORGIND and you need to look for references that are intellectually independent...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Highly promotional. Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Reads like a press release. Rejected at ACPERM and moved...
Click to read more »a source unaffiliated to the subject. Announcements of funding fail WP:ORGIND as they are based on PR and announcements/information by the company and/or...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORGIND. The reference you added from entrepreneur.com is a listing and also fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 20:52, 23...
Click to read more »attributed to the company and hence fails WP:ORGIND Consists entirely of content attributed to the founder, fails WP:ORGIND More trivial funding coverage More trivial...
Click to read more »(UTC) Hi Eastmain, "in-depth coverage from reliable sources" omits the ORGIND requirement for "Independent Content". Anyway, not sure if you're just pulling...
Click to read more »this was deleted. This article cites reliable sources, but those fail WP:ORGIND. WP:NCORP requires independent sourcing, which also includes "Independent...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS scope_creepTalk 12:04, 3 April 2021 (UTC) Redirect to Dan Kaminsky:...
Click to read more »fails WP:ORGIND as it relies on information provided by the company and a company officer, not intellectually independent, fails WP:ORGIND. Keep Good...
Click to read more »in thi sohu.com article. Clearly not "Independent Content" and fails WP:ORGIND This from ChinaDaily.com is a puff piece in which any discussion on the...
Click to read more »from the founder. Fails WP:RS and WP:ORGIND This is a link to the company's Indiegogo campaign, fails WP:ORGIND. Similarly, this from Buzzfeed mention...
Click to read more »Independent Content, fails ORGIND. Finally, this from The Times is an article based on an interview with the founder and fails WP:ORGIND. I am unable to locate...
Click to read more »company, has no "Independent Content", fails WP:ORGIND. BigLottery website is a Press Release, fails ORGIND BBC reference is a mention-in-passing (based...
Click to read more »fails WP:ORGIND. The Muse reference is the same - journalist is invited to the "office" and writes an article pumping the company, fails WP:ORGIND. None...
Click to read more »HighKing++ 13:58, 22 November 2022 (UTC) Comment You appear to be ignoring WP:ORGIND and the requirement for "Independent Content" which in order to count towards...
Click to read more »day, fails WP:ORGIND. Clickz, This from ClickZ is based on a company announcement and even says it in the second sentence, also fails ORGIND. This from People...
Click to read more »is sheer-promo-spam failing WP:ORGIND, quoting the people at helm.Almost akin to a press-release.This too fails WP:ORGIND on same grounds.is a borderline-RS...
Click to read more »Content nor has it any details on the company. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. The Fox Business reference is essentially an interview with Kathy and a...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Comment Lets examine the references: Launches today Fails WP:ORGIND. Not independent as it is press-release. The online game of borrowing money...
Click to read more »July 2018 (UTC) Comment Hi Eastmain - you appear to be interpreting WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH incorrectly. You appear to leave out the fact that references...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH. Second, nobody has mentioned WP:ORGIND and the fact that a reference must pass both CORPDEPTH *and* ORGIND - it isn't an either/or situation. Just...
Click to read more »Content" as per ORGIND. DataAMI article suffers the same flaws. Fails ORGIND. Google is a partner company, not independent, fails ORGIND. Chicago Tribune...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND. Others are run-of-the-mill listings and fails CORPDEPTH. Others again are from connected sources and are not independent, failing WP:ORGIND....
Click to read more »Content, this fails WP:ORGIND. The second article is a mention-in-passing containing a quotation from the founder, also fails WP:ORGIND. None of the references...
Click to read more »Press Release and fails WP:ORGIND as it is not an independent secondary source. This bizjournals.com article also fails WP:ORGIND as it is also based on a...
Click to read more »Babymissfortune 05:32, 16 December 2017 (UTC) Delete Yeah, sources fail WP:ORGIND etc. Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:50, 16 December 2017 (UTC) Delete per promotional...
Click to read more »"Independent Content" and fails ORGIND Express Tribune reference relies entirely on a press release (and says so), fails ORGIND Next from the Express Tribune...
Click to read more »this notice. Thanks, Enigmamsg 20:54, 25 June 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:ORGIND. Its primary reference denotes that the founder of the Akasha Project is...
Click to read more »of the topic. Whether you look at GNG or ORGIND, same thing, but a better clarification is found in ORGIND. HighKing++ 10:07, 13 August 2018 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »coverage of the subject (WP:CORPDEPTH) and contain independent content (WP:ORGIND). I have examined the links added to the article and I do not see any that...
Click to read more »announcements or information provided by the company or their execs fail ORGIND. I've looked at the references including those that WKAsia mentions above...
Click to read more »opinion/analysis. Fails ORGIND. This from Union Leader relies entirely on information provided by company executives, fails ORGIND The Dartmouth reference...
Click to read more »has no Independent Content, fails WP:ORGIND This from Israel21c is copied from this PR announcement, fails WP:ORGIND This in Forbes is also based on an...
Click to read more »interviews/quotations or company announcements and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. I've tried to find references that meet the criteria for establishing notability...
Click to read more »Economist article relies on information provided by a co-founder and fails ORGIND. The Bloomberg reference doesn't have any in-depth information on the company...
Click to read more »company does but fails WP:ORGIND. This says something about the history of their production process but fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND (and not independent)...
Click to read more »to include any Independent Content, fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORGIND. This from bikebiz lists some companies that will attend a trade show and...
Click to read more »cannot be considered independent and fails WP:ORGIND. The second Arabian Business article also fails WP:ORGIND since the article is part of public relations...
Click to read more »has no attributed journalist) and fails WP:ORGIND and company announcements about funding (fails WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 10:18...
Click to read more »website. Fails ORGIND WSJ article follows a company announcement and an interview with the CEO, there is no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND The three Geekwire...
Click to read more »of the sources contain Independent Content as per the definition in WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and NCORP. HighKing++ 16:56, 28 February 2020 (UTC) I'm...
Click to read more »criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:GNG, fails WP:ORGIND. GermanKity (talk) 02:46, 28 May 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »if the Keep !voters have read WP:NCORP (especially WP:CORPDEPTH and [WP:ORGIND]]) because I do not understand how they reached the conclusion that references...
Click to read more »announcements, none of which meet ORGIND). HighKing++ 11:47, 31 December 2022 (UTC) We will have to agree to disagree, as per WP:ORGIND that you cite to: "A primary...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Generic online learning company. scope_creepTalk 09:45, 18 September 2020...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. You say that it is "bizarre" that articles that rely on an interview is somehow not independent - please see WP:ORGIND and specifically...
Click to read more »2020-11-16.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: deprecated archival service (link) Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH. Advertisement. Writer is selling the hotel. Feinstein, Paul...
Click to read more »Fails WP:SPIP. References are based on PR and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 16:53, 3 September 2017 (UTC) For the sake of clarity and...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS. Refs are PR and run of the mill business news. scope_creepTalk...
Click to read more »business-as-usual reporting and fails the criteria independent content as per WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 20:18, 18 June 2019 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) References fail WP:ORGIND, WP:NCORP, and WP:CORPDEPTH. Refs moslty focuse on singers and other brands...
Click to read more »entirely on a company announcement. First sentence confirms it. Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Next from AnimeNewsNetwork is also based on a company...
Click to read more »for the purposes of establishing notability, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. This pakistantoday.com.pk reference is based on an announcement and is...
Click to read more »indications of notability, fails GNG. References fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND and fail the criteria for establishing notability. -- HighKing++ 13:08,...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP. The article has two citations to the same trade magazine, but per WP:ORGIND there is a presumption against the use of coverage in trade magazines to...
Click to read more »quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Edwardx (talk) 22:12, 25 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - Fails WP:ORGIND. I had no luck locating anything aside...
Click to read more »changing, fails ORGIND and CORPDEPTH This reference refers to Bloomberg and is also entirely based on a company announcement, fails ORGIND and CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND) and an article from theteams.kr which is a Q&A published verbatim with the founder, fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH....
Click to read more »article's talk page. I was aware of WP:ORGIND when I found those articles. In my opinion those articles pass WP:ORGIND. Bait30 Talk? 21:32, 7 March 2020...
Click to read more »Press-release. Fails WP:ORGIND. [8] Press-release. Routine annoucement. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. [9]] Press-release. Fails WP:ORGIND. Out of the 9 references...
Click to read more »January 2018 (UTC) Delete Yup, all appear to be press releases. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH etc Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Highly promotional articles. No coverage. Fails WP:ORGIND. scope_creep (talk) 08:51, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »from the nypost in 2010 fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. The press release fails WP:ORGIND. There are no references that meet the criteria for establishing...
Click to read more »owner (failed WP:ORGIND) and another reference is the opposite, is written by a journalist and contains Independent Content (meets WP:ORGIND) but only describes...
Click to read more »practiced and clients served. We strive to meet that standard." Fails WP:ORGIND. * [3] Some non-notable award page. No context. * [4] "The center of our...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Non-notable org. Brochure article. scope_creepTalk 18:19, 4 January 2020...
Click to read more »gets a mention-in-passing, fails ORGIND and CORPDEPTH This Bloomberg piece is an interview with Tolokonnikova, fails ORGIND This from decrypt.co takes all...
Click to read more »announcements, monies raised, equities offerings. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 11:17, 26 September 2020 (UTC) Delete Totally agree about...
Click to read more »the company, quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews fail ORGIND. Whatever is left over must also meet CORPDEPTH. Not a single reference...
Click to read more »WP:GNG and WP:ORGIND). — Alex26337 (talk) 03:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC) This is a bus service, not an organisation or company, so ORGIND does not apply...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:NCORP. References are a mix of run of the mill business...
Click to read more »There is no "Independent Content" (as per WP:ORGIND) in the article and it clearly and obviously fails WP:ORGIND. The second reference from thebest.gr discusses...
Click to read more »and WP:CORPDEPTH. This thehindubusinessline reference fails WP:ORGIND fails WP:ORGIND AND WP:CORPDEPTH since it is entirely based on an interview with...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Highly promotional. Fails WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 14:52, 12 December 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »the same quotes from company execs. Not "Independent Content", fails WP:ORGIND Reuters article is also entirely based on a company announcement (second...
Click to read more »boundaries bla bla bla", those are promotional announcements failing WP:ORGIND (requiring the content of the sources to independent i. e. "original and...
Click to read more »provide significant in-depth coverage of the company, references fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP HighKing++ 18:27, 2 June...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. No effective referencing. scope_creepTalk 18:43, 22 August...
Click to read more »fails ORGIND. PC Tech Magazine article dated October 2015, entirely based on an interview with the CEO, no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND Alphr article...
Click to read more »NetwonX, nothing more) and fails WP:ORGIND. The Venturebeat article is based on a company announcements and fails WP:ORGIND. The Forbes article is also a mention...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. Coverage is routine business news. Fails WP:SIRS. UPE. scope_creepTalk...
Click to read more »substantially on interviews fail WP:ORGIND. Likewise details which are copied from the company website or PR fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Topic fails...
Click to read more »TrainTalk 15:43, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Edwardx (talk) 16:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:Corp and is...
Click to read more »they therefore fail the criteria for establishing notability, failing ORGIND. Here's a list of those sources from the article: Entrepreneur, Economic...
Click to read more »18:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC) It is routine coverage that WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. There is no WP:SECONDARY source amongst the lot of it. Reference 6 is the...
Click to read more »business. Was G11, then SPA came in and removed. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. WP:ORGIND and WP:ORGCRIT. scope_creepTalk 13:43, 12 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »Sample". Fails WP:ORGIND. This reference from Boulder Weekly is entirely based on a interview with the founder/CEO, fails WP:ORGIND. Finally, this from...
Click to read more »from but your position suggests that BCAST somehow takes precedence over ORGIND when it comes to references. I don't believe that is the case at all. BCAST...
Click to read more »independent coverage and fails WP:ORGIND. The Punktastic reference is also entirely based on an interview, likewise fails WP:ORGIND. Finally the San Diego CityBeat...
Click to read more »independent, no indepth information on the company, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. The foodengineeringmag reference is a passing mention that Gray Construction...
Click to read more »meets the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG. HighKing++ 22:00, 29 April 2018 (UTC) Keep I disagree...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 23:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC) Delete - The only sources are...
Click to read more »fails ORGIND. This from the State Information Service reports on a discussion between the Egyptian PM and the CEO of the topic company, fails ORGIND for...
Click to read more »voters are not familiar with WP:NCORP and specifically WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Not a single one of the references mentioned in the article or the Times...
Click to read more »the company, quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews fail ORGIND. Whatever is left over must also meet CORPDEPTH. None of the references...
Click to read more »promotional, no intellectually independent references available as per WP:ORGIND. Fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 16:14, 26 September 2018 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »failing WP:ORGIND Not in-depth enough to meet WP:CORPDEPTH Interview - consists entirely of content attributed to the company, failing WP:ORGIND Interview...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. Hugsyrup 11:28, 18 December 2019 (UTC) Comment From WP:ORGIND: Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability...
Click to read more »The book cannot therefore be considered "Independent Content" as per WP:ORGIND. The article in Review Journal has no attributed journalist (red flag) but...
Click to read more »the company, fails ORGIND. TechCrunch article is similarly based entirely on a funding announcement by the company, fails ORGIND. This next Economic...
Click to read more »South East Asia music instrument retailer, Swee Lee," he said. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS * [2] A smiling picture of Kuok Meng Ru. Fails [[WP:SIRS]. Dependent...
Click to read more »regurgitates what is said in the interview without providing ORGIND "independent content", fails ORGIND. TechCrunch (2019) source repeats part of an announcement...
Click to read more »been provided by the founder. This is not Independent Content and fails WP:ORGIND. Similarly, this from The Hindu is also based on an interview and there...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Not so many changes from Previous deletion. fails WP:GNG and WP:ORGIND GermanKity (talk) 10:44, 6 June 2021 (UTC) Nomination withdrawal GermanKity...
Click to read more »company information, fails ORGIND CNBC based entirely on interview and company information, no Independent Content, fails ORGIND [1] article based entirely...
Click to read more »in-depth information on the company and therefore fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. This NYT reference relies on an affiliated source (a customer) and quotations...
Click to read more »website for information, fails WP:ORGIND. And the kens5.com reference also relies on an interview and fails WP:ORGIND. Overall, topic fails WP:NCORP and...
Click to read more »department and/or lazy churnalism. Topic fails GNG, references fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. HighKing++ 18:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC) HighKing, the...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND. Similarly, listings such as those published by Crunchbase fail the criteria since anybody can create a profile and also fails WP:ORGIND. --...
Click to read more »succeeding in getting funding, fails WP:ORGIND. WSJ Blogs article fails as blogs are not accepted as RS. Also fails ORGIND for the same reasons as the Xconomy...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP and WP:ORGIND scope_creep (talk) 17:06, 3 September 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Classic startup. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND and WP:ORGCRIT. Refs are run of the mill business news, press releases....
Click to read more »the company, quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews fail ORGIND. Whatever is left over must also meet CORPDEPTH. Certainly "plenty of coverage"...
Click to read more »company announcements (fails as a PRIMARY source and/or WP:CORPDEPTH/WP:ORGIND) or are mentions-in-passing (fails WP:CORPDEPTH) or are based on quotations/interviews...
Click to read more »Content", fails ORGIND. Next from the Herald Extra is a simple repeat of a company announcement and a press release some days earlier, fails ORGIND. Similarly...
Click to read more »those articles fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:ORGIND. No arguments were made about "reliable sources". A reliable source could...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - per WP:NCORP, there is insufficient WP:CORPDEPTH with WP:ORGIND. The article is supported by trivial coverage of a product or a product...
Click to read more »regurgitating the content of a Talk, fails ORGIND Next Games Industry article also simply regurgitates a talk by Tran, fails ORGIND This from 80.lv also simple repeats...
Click to read more »exclusively on company produced material or PR (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Edwardx (talk) 16:41, 23 February 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »is PR, fails ORGIND Travel Weekly is PR, fails ORGIND Gulf News relies totally on comments/information from the company/execs. Fails ORGIND. Arab News is...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP and WP:ORGIND. Sources are a mix of churnalism. scope_creep (talk) 06:48, 19 June 2018...
Click to read more »are just listings and PR provided by the company, not Independent, fails ORGIND and CORPDEPTH CNBC gives the company a brief mention at the end of this...
Click to read more »and therefore fails WP:ORGIND. Similarly the livemint reference is based on an announcement/interview by Patni and fails WP:ORGIND for the same reason....
Click to read more »Content" (as per ORGIND). Here's a quickie analysis of the sources. This from BOL News is based entirely on an interview with the CEO, fails ORGIND Very short...
Click to read more »Are you sure you've properly read and understood both WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND? References that meet the criteria for establishing notability are examined...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND. The motherboard reference is based on a company announcement and quotations from company sources (dependent coverage), also failing WP:ORGIND...
Click to read more »relies entirely on information and quotes provided by the company, fails ORGIND and CORPDEPTH This in USA Today quotes from a survey conducted by the company...
Click to read more »connected with the organization (eg have taken a franchise) - they fail ORGIND. I can provide reasoning for each reference if required. Most of those references...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SIRS. Native advertising. scope_creepTalk 20:36...
Click to read more »repeated for the launch of their 2020 calendar in Best Bengal. Fails WP:ORGIND. This from Indian Express Bengali is another announcement. There is no in-depth...
Click to read more »notability. They are either based on company announcements and fail WP:ORGIND or are passing-mentions and fail WP:CORPDEPTH. HighKing++ 13:42, 11 February...
Click to read more »"intellectually independent". See WP:NCORP and especially the WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND sections. HighKing++ 21:10, 19 August 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »Content". They fail ORGIND This and this in India Times are standard company listing/descriptions, not significant, fails SIGCOV and ORGIND Finally, This is...
Click to read more »independent content, fails ORGIND. This is another regurgitation of a company press release. Fails ORGIND. This techcrunch article fails ORGIND for the exact same...
Click to read more »they also need to meet the criteria of "independent content" as per WP:ORGIND guidelines. Those references don't - they're a collection of churnalism...
Click to read more »Earthquake appeal, fails ORGDEPTH and ORGIND; we have an article discussing the involvement of MINTS in Nepal, fails ORGIND and ORDDEPTH; finally we have a...
Click to read more »fails WP:ORGIND. The final reference from Courier Post is similarly based on Company PR and similar announcements, totally fails WP:ORGIND. HighKing++...
Click to read more »fails ORGIND Forbes article from 2021 after companies had left Belarus, another interview with the CEO, no "Independent Content", also fails ORGIND None...
Click to read more »for establishing notability. Please especially pay attention to the WP:ORGIND section and "Independent Content". HighKing++ 20:30, 7 January 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »theHawaii News Now website. This is not "Independent Content" and fails WP:ORGIND Your 2nd and 3rd links point to the same article. This Pacific Business...
Click to read more »based on an interview with Joe Roets, the CEO of Dragonchain Inc. As per WP:ORGIND, a reference must have "Independent Content" which is defined as follows:...
Click to read more »routine funding/acquisition news and announcements? Especially with WP:ORGIND and "Independent Content" in mind. I'm not seeing it. HighKing++ 14:38,...
Click to read more »TechCrunch/Forbes/Bloomberg "profiles" that all fail WP:ORGIND as they are not "intellectually independent". ORGIND states Independence of the content (or intellectual...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND. This Hoodline reference is a trivial article, fails WP:CORPDEPTH as it contains no in-depth information on the company and fails WP:ORGIND as...
Click to read more »Content, fails WP:ORGIND This from Bobs Range is unavailable to me even from archive.org but it is a connected company therefore fails WP:ORGIND This Government...
Click to read more »AfD's) meet the criteria for establishing notability. References fail WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH, article fails GNG. HighKing++ 19:10, 30 December 2017...
Click to read more »synopsis of personnel, so does not provide sufficient WP:CORPDEPTH with WP:ORGIND. The next source in the article is Light Reading, which has trivial coverage...
Click to read more »are a primary and not independent of the subject, failing WP:SIRS and WP:ORGIND and 1st reference is of a similar quality failing WP:SIRS. scope_creepTalk...
Click to read more »a company announcement, fails WP:ORGIND This in Nepal Health Press is another company announcement, also fails ORGIND This from Nepal Health Press appears...
Click to read more »[4] fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND as the article relies solely on quotations from a company officer. [5] fails WP:ORGIND since it is a company announcement...
Click to read more »satisfying WP:NCORP) but also a lot of non-independent coverage (see WP:ORGIND) Ysangkok (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »announcements. Additionally, it is not completely clear that those sources meet WP:ORGIND, Il Foglio, for example , appears to be an interview. I'll try and do a...
Click to read more »WP:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Examples_of_dependent_coverage from WP:ORGIND Moreover one of the link you mentioned [5] is not even about Bihari Puraskar...
Click to read more »13 March 2022 (UTC) Comment Thank you for that reference. It fails WP:ORGIND criteria as it an interview with Seema Aziz, therefore a PRIMARY source...
Click to read more »not intellectually independent and in-depth. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND, topic fails GNG. HighKing++ 01:58, 2 March 2018 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »ask ourselves if the reference contains "Independent Content" as per WP:ORGIND. Had you done that, you would see that none of those references meet the...
Click to read more »the article are either based on announcements or are about the CEO (fails ORGIND) or are about the involvement in a bizarre lawsuit which doesn't by itself...
Click to read more »the company, quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews fail ORGIND. Whatever is left over must also meet CORPDEPTH. An analysis of the refs...
Click to read more »misinterpreting the guidelines for notability, especially WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. References derived from company PR, company announcements and normal business...
Click to read more »opinion, fails ORGIND. The second article is exactly the same, based on regurgitated company information and spin, also failing ORGIND. HighKing++ 17:33...
Click to read more »and most importantly WP:ORGIND. Anyway, this article in HIT Consultant is based on an announcement and therefore fails WP:ORGIND, this Enterprise Talk reference...
Click to read more »you mention meet the criteria for establishing notability. They don't. WP:ORGIND explains in great detail what is required in terms of independence and states...
Click to read more »article. The first references above, is a press-release, the rest fail WP:ORGIND and WP:SIRS. They are not independent. scope_creepTalk 10:04, 15 April 2021...
Click to read more »establishing notability. Take a look at WP:NCORP especially WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Can you link to a source you believe passes NCORP? HighKing++ 13:44, 30...
Click to read more »September 2017 (UTC) Delete the sourcing here utterly fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, and is very run-of-the-mill. The Forbes sourcing is from a contributor:...
Click to read more »the company, quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews fail ORGIND. Looking at the references and excluding PRIMARY sources and obvious PR/Announcements...
Click to read more »not a significant article about the topic company. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORGIND. This in the Shillong Times is based entirely on information provided by...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND, WP:SIRS, WP:ORGCRIT. Non-notable startup. scope_creepTalk 10:53, 31 October...
Click to read more »as it relies extensively on an interview with the founder and fails WP:ORGIND and the second is a mere mention-in-passing and fails WP:CORPDEPTH. HighKing++...
Click to read more »sources. Article is also promotional, fails WP:SPIP. References fail WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. -- HighKing++ 16:17, 8 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND. This is the LinkedIn page of one of the founders. This is an infographic from their website. Self-published. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORGIND. This...
Click to read more »significance remaining, fails WP:ORGIND. The sixth reference is entirely based on information provided by the company and fails WP:ORGIND. But there are a myriad...
Click to read more »website founded by a non notable person Karishma Mehta. do not satisfy WP:ORGIND. Lack of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of...
Click to read more »establishing notability). The article has no "Independent Content" (as per ORGIND) in the form of original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation...
Click to read more »WP:NCORP, especially the bit on "intellectually independent" content at WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 19:47, 10 August 2018 (UTC) Delete-Routine media-hype about...
Click to read more »Fails WP:ORGIND. Hardly any significant coverage about the company and covers the launching of a store.Fails WP:ORGDEPTH. This fails both ORGIND and ORGDEPTH...
Click to read more »The first few pages do not look good as it looks like either they fail WP:ORGIND or WP:CORPDEPTH. ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 17:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC) Keep:...
Click to read more »(talk) 09:24, 7 April 2026 (UTC) And you're missing the WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND parts of WP:NCORP. The TechPoint article talks about the changes to the...
Click to read more »"slips up" and says "are suitable for *our* customer base" :-) failing WP:ORGIND Business Standard has no in-depth info on the company, fails WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »square feet at 250 Hudson St. Passing mention and fails WP:ORGIND. Ref 3 [3] PR. Fails WP:ORGIND. Ref 4 [4] Funding news. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Ref 5 [5] Funding...
Click to read more »significant coverage in the Guardian and Newsday, so it comes down to WP:ORGIND. This is ultimately a subjective criterion, and the broad consensus here...
Click to read more »the *organization* WP:CORPDEPTH from some not affiliated with the org WP:ORGIND? Thank you. HighKing++ 21:08, 8 July 2022 (UTC) The entire article, as you...
Click to read more »The LA Times article fails WP:ORGIND as it is based entirely on an interview with Ken Baumann and therefore fails WP:ORGIND. I'm unable to locate any references...
Click to read more »announcements or interviews/quotations from company officers, etc. As per WP:ORGIND - Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability...
Click to read more »venture capital fund that they'd invested in the company, therefore fails WP:ORGIND. This from Daily Times is a brief mention, fails WP:CORPDEPTH. This second...
Click to read more »modified. If it isn't *clearly* showing independent content then it fails ORGIND. Here, the references are simply regurgitating company announcements and...
Click to read more »presented, but most editors here felt some of the sources failed WP:SPIP or WP:ORGIND, and in aggregate, they failed WP:CORPDEPTH. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:41, 13...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Generic. scope_creepTalk 07:37, 20 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »content", that's advertising, fails ORGIND This from Economic Times is a press release from the company and fails ORGIND. For example, you can find the exact...
Click to read more »better than that CNN source that we're discussing. That source fails WP:ORGIND as most of the content is from comments made by the label's founder. There...
Click to read more »intellectually independent and fails ORGIND. The other references are also mainly from connected sources, failing WP:ORGIND. There doesn't appear to be any...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 17:32, 6 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »wonder if you have bothered to read, and cared what WP:CORPDEPTH, and WP:ORGIND has to say. I'm not going to pick through each of the source, but skimming...
Click to read more »05:41, 6 January 2019 (UTC) I removed the citations which is against the WP:ORGIND. There are another journals and books have details about this topic. I think...
Click to read more »allegations. HighKing++ 13:04, 15 April 2025 (UTC) This is regurgitated PR, fails ORGIND. This references the aforementioned hacking allegations, no in-depth information...
Click to read more »here's a breakdown on why they fail NCORP: PR and Announcements - fails ORGIND: NASA 2026 PR, 2018 Award by EnlightED, Unicef partnership announcement...
Click to read more »organization, the appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP which includes WP:ORGIND and WP:ORGDEPTH. ORGIND requires "Independent content" which, in order to count towards...
Click to read more »company and has no other information, has no "Independent Content", fails ORGIND. Also insufficient in-depth information, fails CORPDEPTH Sumarium article...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Doesn't meet the polices: WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Generic run-of-the-mill references. scope_creepTalk 21:21, 9 September...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 00:17, 16 October 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Non-notable. WP:MILL. Fails WP:ORGCRITE, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 01:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »on company announcements and PR. References fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Happy to revisit this nomination if anyone finds good references. HighKing++...
Click to read more »entries and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND or they are company produced or based on announcements and fails WP:ORGIND. The articles on the Melen brothers...
Click to read more »describes the product as and are based on what they say - thus failing WP:ORGIND Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:28, 16 December 2017 (UTC) I disagree. Several...
Click to read more »that time. Fails CORPDEPTH and ORGIND This from The Economic Times is "part of a series of interviews" - fails ORGIND This next from Moneycontrol is the...
Click to read more »obligatory serious-looking photos of the founders doing techy things. Fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. THe Forbes] reference most likely fails WP:RS since...
Click to read more »producers and writers, which is limited WP:CORPDEPTH and a failure of WP:ORGIND to support notability. The third ref is a Billboard 'top 40' list that is...
Click to read more »information provided by the company with no "Independent Content" as per WP:ORGIND. Same content in these other articles around the same date - Latimer Partners...
Click to read more »run-of-the-mill business or company announcement that fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. This dawn.com reference fails since the only piece related to the company...
Click to read more »fails WP:ORGIND as all of the information is provided by the company and the CEO, there is no "independent content" as required by WP:ORGIND. The first...
Click to read more »individual product of theirs is notable either, even ignoring questions of ORGIND or RS. The coverage of their events would seem to be excluded on WP:SPIP...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Tthe article does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Bigneeerman (talk) 17:47, 16 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »TheHindu.com reference is based on a company announcement and fails WP:ORGIND. The TimesOfIndia reference has not attributed journalist and the information...
Click to read more »regurgitates this announcement - not "Independent Content" and fails WP:ORGIND. This other Forbes article is from a "contributor" and is not deemed a reliable...
Click to read more »entirely and solely on information provided by the company and fails WP:ORGIND as it does not contain any original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation...
Click to read more »criteria for establishing notability - please see WP:NCORP, especially WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. HighKing++ 18:36, 30 September 2018 (UTC) Delete I cannot...
Click to read more »which most sources are PR; can't find much to satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. This is the author's only contribution to Wikipedia thus far. FalconK (talk)...
Click to read more »the company, quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews fail ORGIND. Whatever is left over must also meet CORPDEPTH. Not a single reference...
Click to read more »promotional materials, and routine business announcements. Fails CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND and GNG. Steve Quinn (talk) 03:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. scope_creepTalk 17:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC) Rejected at Afc as being...
Click to read more »the company hence failed WP:ORGIND. And the other two references from CNBC are also the announcement/PR, failed WP:ORGIND. GermanKity (talk) 05:37, 6...
Click to read more »TWL) Article appears to fail GNG. References fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND as they rely on company announcements, quotations/interviews with company...
Click to read more »Best regards. Camcrowe (talk) 21:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC) The Forbes fails WP:ORGIND as its an interview style article which involves the company, the 2nd Forbes...
Click to read more »an interview with the founder, fails ORGIND ComputerWeekly simply regurgitated this PR announcement fails ORGIND Book "Strategic Approaches to Banking...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not appear to have any sources that meet WP:ORGIND. Very little significant coverage to begin with. ––FormalDude talk 03:40...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails GNG, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND and rely almost exclusively on company announcements of new services or...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Refs are mix of blogs and press releases. Potentially...
Click to read more »meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 10:48, 29 May 2018 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. Available sources are largely unacceptable such as discogs which can not...
Click to read more »[2] (mostly based on promotional quotes), [3], fail WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND; tangential coverage of the founder, e.g. [4], [5], fails WP:CORPDEPTH;...
Click to read more »09:49, 19 October 2020 (UTC) Comment Take a look at WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND since WP:NCORP is the applicable set of guidelines. For example, this piece...
Click to read more »Montreal (talk) 07:23, 25 May 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND and GNG. The article currently has 5 sources. 4 definitely fail the criteria...
Click to read more »the company and quotations from various company officers. This fails WP:ORGIND. Finally, this motofocus reference is trivial coverage a non-notable award...
Click to read more »independent as is largely based on PRIMARY sources, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 19:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC) Keep The PROD was disruptive...
Click to read more »broken links, mentions-in-passing or PRIMARY sources, therefore fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. There is nothing in the article to provide any indication...
Click to read more »meet GNG/NCORP and I note that the two EE Times references above fail WP:ORGIND as they rely almost entirely on interviews with people connected with the...
Click to read more »website, company website, press release, oh company website. Where's the WP:ORGIND, the WP:CORPDEPTH - fails WP:NCORP. Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:39, 8 January...
Click to read more »They relate to the same interview and carry the same quotations, fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH This from Canadian Business Franchise and also this are...
Click to read more »this fails WP:ORGIND. This Day Live is based entirely on an announcement and quotations with no "Independent Content", also fails WP:ORGIND. The IDN Times...
Click to read more »company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Lack of WP:SIGCOV. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Article has...
Click to read more »analysis or opinion on the company. The reference fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 18:22, 22 October 2017 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »history for further information. In addition to this, it does not pass NCORP, ORGIND, and CORPDEPTH. RPSkokie (talk) 07:01, 31 December 2022 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »& paste move back. I cannot find any sources meeting WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:ORGIND. Alpha3031 (t • c) 11:29, 7 May 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Fails WP:NCORP. Refs are routine coverage, PR, monies raised. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SIRS. scope_creepTalk 22:19, 22 August 2023 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »the company's general manager and therefore fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. The allocine reference is derived from a company announcement and relies...
Click to read more »" said Wil Garland, the chief executive of American IronHorse. Fails WP:ORGIND. Motorcycle annouces layoffs. This is a routine annoucement that fails WP:CORPDEPTH...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. The sources are exclusively press releases and based on press releases...
Click to read more »agencies, even before its Unicorn status, which satisfy WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. These include The Hindu, CNBC, Economic Times, and Money Control. There...
Click to read more »criteria for establishing notability. The existing references mostly fails WP:ORGIND/WP:CORPDEPTH. HighKing++ 21:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND * With Toba Capital, Vinny Smith suddenly emerges as a player in the venture industry Smith, 48, who rarely grants interviews. Fails WP:ORGIND...
Click to read more »the references meet the criteria for establishing notability and fail WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 11:15, 13 August 2018 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 15:13, 22 August 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:SIRS. scope_creepTalk 14:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »feature TalentLMS as an advertiser, therefore fails WP:RS and possibly WP:ORGIND. The academia.edu link also fails to be intellectually independent as the...
Click to read more »fails WP:ORGIND. Forbes is written by a contributor so its non-rs. The FT is a passing mention and quote to the boss which fails WP:ORGIND. The Telegraph...
Click to read more »all the information has been provided by the owner/company. This fails ORGIND as there's no "Independent Content" The Chicago Tribune is a mere two sentence...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND, and a "Retailer Profile" interview with a watch industry trade publication of unknown reliability, but which probably also fails WP:ORGIND. I...
Click to read more »Ref 1 [11] Ultra-local newspaper that both fails WP:AUD and more fails WP:ORGIND as its a PR piece that involved the whole staff. It is not independent....
Click to read more »2020 (UTC) WP:NCORP specifically covers this variety of nonsense in WP:ORGIND, so no, it isn't just my personal feelings versus yours - David Gerard (talk)...
Click to read more »and hence fails to satisfy WP:ORGIND Ref 23 consists mostly of quotes from the company and hence fails to satisfy WP:ORGIND Ref 24 is behind a paywall So...
Click to read more »the criteria for establishing notability and fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 20:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC) @HighKing: There's enough coverage...
Click to read more »entirely on an interview with the "founder", is an advertorial, and fails WP:ORGIND. Notability is not inherited, for this topic to be notable there must be...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. Generic. scope_creepTalk 13:33, 23 August 2020 (UTC) Inclined...
Click to read more »10 August 2018 (UTC) Comment This reference from lesechos.fr fails WP:ORGIND since it is not intellectually independent and relies on information provided...
Click to read more »June 2017 (UTC) Delete I agree with DGG. This article clearly fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. Not pointing to any editors in particular, but...
Click to read more »piece based on a company announcement. Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. This also from The Myanmar Times is based entirely on an interview with...
Click to read more »a puff piece with all the information provided by the founder, fails WP:ORGIND. Someone else mentioned the Irish News reference which describes providing...
Click to read more »Independent Content. The article is a thinly-disguised PR piece and fails WP:ORGIND. This from renewablesnow.com has not attributed journalist (WP:RS issue)...
Click to read more »August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 16:48, 25 August 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »included in the article, but nothing else that I see online satisfies both WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. As such, there does not appear to exist WP:SIRS for this...
Click to read more »CORPDEPTH and ORGIND. The next one is equally short and does not provide any indepth independent content sufficient to meet CORPDEPTH and ORGIND. Sky news...
Click to read more »PR announcement from the company (marked as such) and therefore fails WP:ORGIND. The second reference from tribine.com.pk is also part of the company's...
Click to read more »manager, therefore the article is not intellectually independent and fails WP:ORGIND. Allison Jean Paully !votes to Keep and provides the reason that it has...
Click to read more »extensively based on company announcements and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Of the other references, buzzfeed is not regarded as a reliable source...
Click to read more »organization are unlikely to have coverage that satisfies WP:ORGDEPTH or even WP:ORGIND. Often coverage is limited to student publications. I see nothing in the...
Click to read more »company, also fails ORGIND. I'm unable to locate anything that meets the criteria. HighKing++ 15:58, 21 August 2023 (UTC) WP:ORGIND requires that the author...
Click to read more »Delete not even near passing WP:CORP, no reliable independent sources WP:ORGIND, and no significant coverage as well WP:CORPDEPTH. –Ammarpad (talk) 00:55...
Click to read more »that is independent (including being intellectually independent) - see WP:ORGIND. The references above fail the criteria since they are entirely based on...
Click to read more »independent analysis or opinion, therefore fails as a PRIMARY source and fails WP:ORGIND. The other references are mainly company announcements or business-as-usual...
Click to read more »references as a bit of PR and an interview fails WP:ORGIND. The second one is a fundraising profile fails WP:ORGIND another block of PR with the founders and as...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Native advertising. scope_creepTalk 16:15, 3 October 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »No evidence of in-depth, independent coverage satisfying WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:ORGIND. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Lack of WP:SIGCOV. Edwardx (talk) 15:00, 25 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »most of its citations are WP:ROUTINE/WP:ADMASQ. Lacks WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORGIND. Also, the page is created by a WP:SOCK. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion...
Click to read more »company "infomercials" and are not intellectually independent, failing WP:ORGIND. Topic fails WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing++ 14:26, 3 February 2019 (UTC) Apologies...
Click to read more »references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 14:52, 31 May 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Native advertising. scope_creepTalk 09:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »criteria for notability and are not intellectually independent failing WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 16:29, 16...
Click to read more »the criteria for establishing notability and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 17:44, 26 August 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND as they all rely on quotations from company sources, are press releases...
Click to read more »company* (see WP:CORPDEPTH) and also containing "Independent Content" (see WP:ORGIND ie. not based on stuff announced/provided by the company). None of the references...
Click to read more »written by an employee. Non-notable company. All the sourcing fails WP:ORGIND or WP:CORPDEPTH as recycled press releases and the like. It's excluded from...
Click to read more »based entirely on funding announcement(s) (failing WP:ORGIND) or promotion by the VC (failing WP:ORGIND - connected source). Two articles might meet the criteria...
Click to read more »establishing notability, failing either WP:RS (no journalist accredited), WP:ORGIND (based on company announcements and PR) and WP:CORPDEPTH (no in-depth coverage...
Click to read more »the entire article relied on an interview with Mike Bausch so fails WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 19:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more thorough...
Click to read more »Reference fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:CORPDEPTH and (for information on the company) WP:ORGIND. This from Business.com is another in-depth review of the software and support...
Click to read more »TWL) This product lacks independent coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:PRODUCT and GNG. There is coverage of the parent company,KDE, but not...
Click to read more »the company, quotations, press releases, announcements, interviews fail ORGIND. Whatever is left over must also meet CORPDEPTH. This is merely the Government...
Click to read more »The Standard reference is a press release/company announcement. Fails WP:ORGIND. All Africa, The Auto Guide reference isn't even about this company but...
Click to read more »you added references 12-15. Reference 12 is the same as 18 and fails WP:ORGIND as it is a simple regurgitation of a Press Release and/or not "intellectually...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Brochure article, advertisement. Fails WP:SIRS, WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:ORGCRIT. scope_creepTalk 19:11, 8 March 2021 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »representative suggesting that they were based on PR materials, contrary to WP:ORGIND. Creating this article was Ayokonasir's only contribution to Wikipedia,...
Click to read more »from company personnel or associated people, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 15:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »original/independent analysis/investigation/fact checking/opinion so it fails WP:ORGIND as a source. HighKing++ 11:42, 17 March 2023 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 15:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC) Comment: In response to "HighKing"...
Click to read more »not independent, fails ORGIND. TheNextBitcoin.net is also not "independent" and even carries a disclaimer here, fails ORGIND. This leaves us with...
Click to read more »- same as this one on the Kerry website which is marked as PR. Fails WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 11:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC) Delete Nonsense to suggest that a company...
Click to read more »of reasons but mostly because they rely on company-produced material WP:ORGIND. If a second reference is found, I'm happy to change my !vote. For now,...
Click to read more »Fails WP:ORGIND Ref 6 [3] Company research to determine what needs done to Buckeye Lake State Park. Its not independent. Fails WP:ORGIND Ref 7 [4] Survey...
Click to read more »modified. If it isn't *clearly* showing independent content then it fails ORGIND. Here, the references are simply regurgitating company announcements or...
Click to read more »coverage. Seemed to have dissapeared. References are run of the mill, fail WP:ORGIND. Usual startup news. No coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creepTalk 00:41...
Click to read more »the criteria for establishing notability and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 14:14, 26 August 2017 (UTC) Delete per nom Spiderone 12:02...
Click to read more »references fail the criteria for establishing notability (WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). There are some mentions of the company chosing the Stockholm exchange...
Click to read more »that guideline are WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND (and especially the definition of "Independent Content" in ORGIND). I'm going to assume all references are...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND scope_creepTalk 09:47, 18 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - notability not established...
Click to read more »15 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 19:59, 20 July 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »establishing notability, most are run-of-the-mill business announcements, fails WP:ORGIND and NCORP. HighKing++ 20:36, 29 April 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. No indication of being notable. scope_creepTalk 01:43...
Click to read more »WP:ORGIND. Fail. This Bangkok Post reference is based on an interview with a founder (no mention of that in Cunard's extract) and fails WP:ORGIND as it...
Click to read more »15 July 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND -- HighKing++ 18:30, 18 July 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »CORPDEPTH and ORGIND; (2) is a regurgitated announcement, exactly the same as ones found in Hindustan Times, The Federal and M9 News - fails ORGIND; (3) Same...
Click to read more »WP:CORP. The only substantial coverage is in trade publications which WP:ORGIND frowns upon using to establish notability. SmartSE (talk) 22:55, 20 May...
Click to read more »its own right. References are not intellectually independent and fail WP:ORGIND. Wikipedia is not a yellow pages and is not a platform for promotion. Topic...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:ORG and WP:ORGIND. All sources are based on press releases. scope_creep (talk) 14:40, 26 January...
Click to read more »Hitro talk 10:16, 8 October 2019 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Not a single independent secondary source is available that is in-depth...
Click to read more »the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 17:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »quotes made by the leaders. There is very little "Independent Content" (ORGIND) and not enough to meet CORPDEPTH. The UNI India reference appears to be...
Click to read more »press release. An online search for additional coverage did not return WP:ORGIND-compliant reliable sources that covered the subject substantially. As the...
Click to read more »Delete Not notable. Acnetj (talk) 09:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:ORGIND. No secondary coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep (talk) 19:39, 23 April...
Click to read more »founder. No significant coverage on the company itself. References fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 16:13, 11...
Click to read more »opinion, therefore fails WP:ORGIND. The final reference relies exclusively on an interview with Nicholson and fails WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 20:11, 22 November...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Non notable company. Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. scope_creep (talk) 18:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »company produced material and/or quotations (fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND). Edwardx (talk) 00:57, 9 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »references are intellectually independent and fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 14:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC) Speedy per G11, or alternatively delete...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND scope_creepTalk 11:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »lacks encyclopedic value WP:PROMO. Lack WP:SIGCOV. Fails [[WP:NCORP], WP:ORGIND, and WP:RS. Suspected WP:UPE - because creator is also connected with Revolt...
Click to read more »August 2017 (UTC) Delete Fails GNG, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 15:13, 22 August 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Available sources are all primary and do not meet the standards of WP:ORGIND. North America1000 04:19, 19 June 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »isn't a press release or based off of one. Fails WP:NCORP, especially WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:47, 19 December 2017 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »references that rely on corporate announcements, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 17:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »Magnates on the launch Interview Fails WP:ORGIND * [8] Paywall, but IPO talk * [9] Interview. Fails WP:ORGIND. Not a single reference in the first block...
Click to read more »of the info/opinion/etc comes from the company executive - and fails WP:ORGIND. The Long Island Press reference discusses the company in the context of...
Click to read more »notability. Neither of the two mentioned above meet the criteria either. As per ORGIND, "Intellectual Independence" states Independent content, in order to count...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 20:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »a non-notable firm that has no coverage that meets WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Little more than a promotional directory listing. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:38...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. UPE. Native advertising for small private company. scope_creepTalk 12:38...
Click to read more »Here are some, but there are more, if insufficient independence for WP:ORGIND is believed. Steve Quinn: please check these out. Ovinus (talk) 23:08, 11...
Click to read more »fails WP:INHERITORG, WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. This pakistantoday.com reference is clearly labelled a Press Release. Fails WP:ORGIND. This arynews.tv is...
Click to read more »notability - fails GNG, references are all company announcements, fails WP:ORGIND. Entirely promotional, fails WP:SPIP. -- HighKing++ 15:27, 10 December 2017...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Highly promotional article. Fails WP:ORGIND scope_creep (talk) 23:16, 10 March 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion has...
Click to read more »Fails WP:NCORP, specifically WP:CORPDEPTH for the trivial coverage, WP:ORGIND for the interview style announcements and profile pages. scope_creepTalk...
Click to read more »independent content/option/analysis and therefore fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. While Kimball appears notable, notability is not inherited. There is also...
Click to read more »WP:SPIP. References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 17:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »this time from Kauppalehti. None of these satisfy all three of WP:RS, WP:ORGIND, and WP:CORPDEPTH, so none contribute towards WP:ORGCRIT. A search returned...
Click to read more »also include "intellectual independence" (see "Independent Content" at WP:ORGIND). "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability...
Click to read more »content", fails WP:ORGIND. The Street article is based *entirely* on an interview with the founder and has no "independent content", fails ORGIND Fortune article...
Click to read more »in any case, two sources are required to establish notability. As per WP:ORGIND, Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability...
Click to read more »meet the criteria for establishing notability. The vast majority fail WP:ORGIND as they rely on information provided by connected parties or press releases...
Click to read more »lawfirm. References fail the criteria for establishing notability, failing WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Notability is not inherited so even though the have...
Click to read more »relies on brief mentions and sponsored news articles. fails WP:GNG, WP:ORGIND or WP:CORPDEPTH GermanKity (talk) 05:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »reference meets the criteria for establishing notability. The first is WP:ORGIND and especially the definition of "Independent Content" which says a reference...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGIND, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:SIRS. 16 employees. scope_creepTalk 13:48, 20 April...
Click to read more »multiple, significant, independent coverage expected by WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND Graywalls (talk) 21:00, 27 April 2021 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »therefore fail WP:ORGIND. This rp-online.de reference repeats a post on the company's Facebook page (PRIMARY source) and fails ORGIND. This backwelt.de...
Click to read more »announcements and run-of-the-mill reports and company listings, fails WP:ORGIND. HighKing++ 17:59, 24 April 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been included...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not a business directory. References fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND, topic fails GNG. HighKing++ 19:12, 21 January 2018 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH scope_creepTalk 14:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »