Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hello, I have been slowly working on bus route articles for a while now. Today, I have re-created the page London Buses route 96. NemesisAT (talk) 21:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On 2 October 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Northern line extension to Battersea, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the tunnel boring machines that dug the London's new Northern line extension were named after the first British astronaut Helen Sharman, and British aviation pioneer Amy Johnson? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Northern line extension to Battersea. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Northern line extension to Battersea), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. Given this edit[1] you may want to know JelenFolf did the same thing to like a dozen articles to delink the MTR § MIS section[2], and to share your ideas at Talk:MTR. 124.217.188.171 (talk) 11:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,
I have reverted the removals you made from the infobox in the Class 455 article. I don't believe that the level of detail provided contravenes either of WP:INDISCRIMINATE or WP:EXCESSDETAIL, noting that both of those pages appear to be directed primarily at the text within the body article). Indeed, presenting that sort of technical data in the infobox would arguably satisfy the direction in WP:INDISCRIMINATE that ... Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing; accordingly, statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability ....
I understand that the Class 455 infobox could appear to be particularly unwieldy, and would note that that's the case because it is a complicated class for which to provide information - it includes significant components taken from an entirely different class of units, and has further undergone a number of changes over its time in service. If that wasn't the case, then the infobox would look much like one in an article for a simple class - the parameters used to construct the infobox are all standard and the information contained in them is also provided for many other BR classes when it is available.
Thank you for your understanding. XAM2175 (T) 11:37, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Beckton Riverside DLR station and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 6#Beckton Riverside station until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 16:35, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm trying to find out how I can update one of the images for Brooklands Museum that Google is pulling from Wikipedia and using as the lead image for the museum. Unfortunately it isn't representative of what the museum offers so ideally we would like to use an alternate image in its place which will hopefully help us attract more visitors. Are you able to help? I noticed you made an update to the page last year and have some experience in motorsport 81.131.103.212 (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Turini2, Thank you for creating Alexandre da Cunha. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the new article, it looks great!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ . (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Netherzone (talk) 16:45, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
{{Re|Netherzone}}
~~~~
On 25 July 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Tour de France, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 19:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
On 1 August 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 Tour de France Femmes, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not at all an expert on Dutch names, but as I mentioned in the edit summary, all sources seem to use "van Vleuten" rather than "Van Vleuten" (except at the start of a sentence, of course). Thanks for reverting your edit of this :) Kiwipete (talk) 10:43, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I know that Alstom Metropolis C751A and C830 units are having the same sounds as these 2 on the London Underground. CastJared (talk) 06:08, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I manual revert the template, involving the Death of Michelle Go, but one editor, @Cards84664 reverted it back. But how did you manual revert after I did manual revert before Cards reverted mine? CastJared (talk) 12:28, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article Northern line extension to Battersea you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Northern line extension to Battersea for comments about the article, and Talk:Northern line extension to Battersea/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Ganesha811 -- Ganesha811 (talk) 02:24, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into La Vuelta Femenina. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. I have corrected the issue. Izno (talk) 20:30, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: your "rewrite lead for consistency with other LU articles" included incorrectly setting the |url-status= parameter of a citation back to "live" when it was in fact quite dead, and pointing to a defective archive capture to boot. I hope that part's not consistent with other LU articles. XAM2175 (T) 11:06, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
|url-status=
On 12 May 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 La Vuelta Femenina, which you created and nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 02:13, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Today is the final day of the 2023 Giro d'Italia. What a Giro it has been! The last 2 weeks have been incredible.
I give you a favor, if you can make a summary for the entire Giro like what you do with the La Vuelta Femenina, and, if possible, put the article in the "In the News" section.
You might also want to add a summary on each individual stage, especially since there is no summary for stage 12 to 20 (stage 21 is still to be held).
Thank you. WL Pro for life (talk) 01:54, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The article 2022 Tour de France Femmes you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2022 Tour de France Femmes for comments about the article, and Talk:2022 Tour de France Femmes/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grnrchst -- Grnrchst (talk) 07:41, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On 27 July 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Tour de France, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 05:57, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On 31 July 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 Tour de France Femmes, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 09:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I feel that my edit to Alstom Aventra is benificial as the previous image was of a variant that looks nothing like the other ones. EJD799 (talk) 19:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Turini2, could you please tell me what this edit is? Thanks, Kiwipete (talk) 07:39, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Turini2. Thank you for your work on 2024 Tour de France Femmes. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is in response to your WP:GOCER request for FAC copyedit of 2022 Tour de France Femmes. I thought I would handle this as I would at FAC (would this be your first FAC submission?) with notes and suggestions rather than direct edits to the article. Let me know if you'd prefer I edited the article directly (which is simpler but less informative). Feel free to ask questions or make comments here.
Please take the following as constructive suggestions. I might be a little more insistent if I was reviewing the article at FAC, but I'll let you figure out what best serves the article. FAs are supposed to adhere to all of the MOS unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, so I'll be looking at a lot of that. I feel some of the tone is leaning toward sports journalism and will also be looking to remove some redundancies and superlatives for a tighter encyclopedic summary.
The 2022 Tour de France Femmes (officially Tour de France Femmes avec Zwift) was the first edition[2] of the Tour de France Femmes, which took place from 24 to 31 July 2022.[1] It was the 16th event in the 2022 UCI Women's World Tour and followed years of campaigning by the women's professional peloton for an equivalent race to the men's Tour de France.[3] The race drew large crowds and had substantial international media coverage, and was highly praised by the public, media, teams and riders.
26h 55' 44"
26:55′44″
26 hr 55 min 44 sec
1 h 30 m 7 s
′ ″
24 teams participated in the race.
144 riders from 25 nationalities started the race, the largest percentage of whom were Dutch (20% of the peloton).
ASO, the organisers of the race, noted that the prize fund
Ahead of the race [list of names] were all named as pre-race favourites for the general classification
Taking place earlier on the same day of the final stage of the men's Tour, stage 1 of the race started beneath the Eiffel Tower in Paris, before the riders tackled eight laps of a circuit around Champs-Élysées.
yellow jersey
maillot jaune
In a sprint finish, Lorena Wiebes (Team DSM) outsprinted Marianne Vos (Jumbo–Visma) to take the first maillot jaune (yellow jersey) of the race, as well as the green jersey of the points classification.
|nolink=yes
Stage 2 to Provins was marred by multiple crashes in the final 30 kilometres (19 mi), with Marta Cavalli (FDJ Suez Futuroscope), one of the favourites for the yellow jersey, having to abandon the race as a result.
On the Côte de Mutigny, the peloton split with a select group of seven riders containing most of the general classification contenders going off the front.
On the final steep climb to the line, Cecilie Uttrup Ludwig (FDJ Suez Futuroscope) outsprinted the group to take the stage, with the Queen of the Mountains (QoM) classification now being led by Femke Gerritse (Parkhotel Valkenburg).
Stage 4 to Bar-sur-Aube was another hilly stage but it also involved four sectors of gravel in the final half of the stage.
was the longest of the Women's WorldTour calendar at 175.6 kilometres (109.1 mi) in length.
In the final sprint, Wiebes took her second stage win from Balsamo and Vos.
With 86 kilometres (53 mi) still to go, the race exploded as Van Vleuten launched an attack on the Petit Ballon, with only Demi Vollering (SD Worx) able to follow her move.
On the second climb of the day, the Col du Platzerwasel, Van Vleuten dropped Vollering a kilometre from the top. On the final climb of the Grand Ballon, Van Vleuten's lead over Vollering increased to almost four minutes.
Van Vleuten lost some time to Vollering on the final plateau section, but she nevertheless powered away to a dominant stage win, 3' 26" ahead of Vollering, who took the polka-dot jersey as leader of the QoM classification.
With 57 kilometres (35 mi) to go, the maillot jaune, Van Vleuten suffered a mechanical. SD Worx and Trek–Segafredo soon lifted the pace in the peloton, with Van Vleuten being forced to chase a deficit of almost a minute. After a while, Van Vleuten eventually made it back to the peloton right at the foot of the second climb, the Ballon d'Alsace.
She passed the remnants of the breakaway while Vollering went in pursuit of the race leader. Much like the previous day, a chase group of GC contenders formed behind the duo. Van Vleuten gradually extended her lead over Vollering towards the finish as she took her second successive stage win, sealing the Tour title in the process. Vollering finished 30 seconds down while also confirming her win in the QoM classification.
one of the hardest races
|image_alt=Route map that shows the stages of the 2022 Tour de France Femmes, with their start and finish towns
|alt=
thumb
I'll leave it at that for now, I think that's most of the big stuff. I'll probably want to take another couple passes through it after you make changes, time permitting. – Reidgreg (talk) 17:16, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have created a sockpuppet investigation for T&TRKFNF2022 regarding the continuous addition of unconfirmed opening dates of various Toronto subway lines. You can respond here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/T&TRKFNF2022. Thanks. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:26, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, recently I have added a map of Line 6 Finch West to the article. I see you have removed it under "Undid revision 1223384821 by Commotatoes (talk) 1) not an improvement imo 2) not a minor edit WP:MINOR"
I understand the minor edit (thank you for clarifying that for me) but I do not understand how a geographical map of the route is not considered an improvement to the page. Was it improperly formatted, or is a map of the line itself not relevant?
I ask this so I have a better idea of what should and should not be contributed. Thank you in advance. Commotatoes (talk) 18:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please read WP:SDESC specifically the section WP:SDNONE regarding why "none" is a valid short description and deliberate override for a specific purpose. The intentional "none" detailed as "(including those that are intentionally blank; see below)" was the remainder of the line that you quoted in your edit summary. Thanks. Canterbury Tail talk 20:50, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Turini, since you have undone a number of minor changes I have made to articles, I would like to clarify that all I intend to do is tidy up the grammar so that it is easier to read and remains consistent across all articles relating to tube stock, and remove any information that is incorrect, irrelevant, speculative or redundant. For example on London Underground 1983 Stock it is better to use the word "trains" instead of "sets" within the infobox, and it is obviously incorrect that they were built from 1980!!! TrainBusFan06 (talk) 07:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Turini2. Thank you for your work on Accessibility of transport in London. Another editor, Aszx5000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
That is quite a tour-de-force of an article - well done and well referenced and constructed. To the extend that it can be condensed a little more (and 4-paragraph lede installed), that would even be more helpful for casual readers, but great job. thanks.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.) Aszx5000 (talk) 12:43, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{Re|Aszx5000}}
Hello! Your submission of Accessibility of transport in London at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! TheNuggeteer (talk) 02:30, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On 3 August 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Accessibility of transport in London, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a third of London Underground stations have step-free access? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Accessibility of transport in London. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Accessibility of transport in London), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Z1720 (talk) 00:04, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
On 20 August 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Tour de France Femmes, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Black Kite (talk) 17:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I just saw that your 2022 Tour de France Femmes FAC was archived. I had hoped we could improve it further before they closed it, but c'est la vie, I guess. I wanted to recommend you go through every sentence of the body and check its claims are truly supported by the sources given for that sentence. If not, then add source or adapt text. Then check the lead if it still matches the body. Ping me when you nominate it again, I'd be happy to review again. Good luck. Edwininlondon (talk) 12:16, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think the older numbers referred to the previous NE Tour Down Under [3]. I am 50:50 about which numbering to use I think a quick revert may be in order. See also Women's_Tour_Down_Under#Previous_Women's_Tour_&_Women's_Cup_winners. Paulpat99 (talk) 04:55, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Accessibility of transport in London you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 13:45, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The article Accessibility of transport in London you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Accessibility of transport in London for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 21:24, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Following you edition on UCI Women's World Tour talk page, I searched for additional information that could be add to the article, with no luck I must say. I did find some articles that might interest you even if not for this article: [4], [5], [6]. Good editions. Rpo.castro (talk) 16:35, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
what source do you want? check realtimetrains.co.uk. 906 will not show up, as it has been destroyed for the past week or 2. 2A02:6B6F:E325:B800:A994:50B3:F079:26B9 (talk) 22:12, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Turini2, I wanted to reach out and apologize for changing the color of the 2023/2024 TDF points jersey in the side bar. The Jersey looked black on my screen (because I had the brightness down low) and I was not aware of the color change for the 2023 race. I have also reverted the 2024 article to your last edit.
I appreciate the work you do on the articles. 180.150.122.150 (talk) 180.150.122.150 (talk) 09:08, 25 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there! I currently have an FAC open on Transportation during the 2024 Summer Olympics and Paralympics and wanted to know if you could provide any comments so it doesn't get archived? If so, I'd appreciate it, but if not, I totally understand. Thanks and best wishes. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 17:41, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
what do you mean Twitter isn't a reliable source?! check the link! the link contains pictures of the train! 2A02:6B6F:E325:B800:92CD:562A:494B:6DFE (talk) 16:11, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you please check this bit of text?
Four laps of the 17.7 kilometres (11.0 mi) circuit (one more lap than the 2023 edition) would take place
It is also mentioned in 2023 Trofeo Alfredo Binda-Comune di Cittiglio. Thanks! Kiwipete (talk) 05:30, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 26 May 2025. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 2025, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/May 2025. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be left there by user:JennyOz, who assists the coordinators by reviewing the blurbs, or by others. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Gog the Mild (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed your request on the help desk [7] about graphic timelines, and wanted to ask whether you were thinking of one that would auto-update when new data was added, or whether a simple image file would suffice. If the latter, I think I could make one for you without too much hassle - I also don't write complex code but I enjoy messing around with graphics. StartGrammarTime (talk) 10:51, 1 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]