User talk:Soderstromverrier

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Christian Science have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Christian Science was changed by Soderstromverrier (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.861749 on 2026-04-05T12:38:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:38, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Soderstromverrier! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Lagtrainzzz (talk) 17:53, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lagtrainzzz (talk • contribs) 18:13, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Lagtrainzzz-- My edits are based on primary sources. What do you dispute? Soderstromverrier Soderstromverrier (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia articles must be based on secondary sources. Your edits are wholly inappropriate and damaging. Bon courage (talk) 19:08, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Christian Science. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing. Bon courage (talk) 19:08, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Dear Bon courage— I will follow your instructions. It's hard for me to believe that you do not want corrections based on primary sources but prefer other authors' commentary, which may be poorly motivated or simply inaccurate. Soderstromverrier Soderstromverrier (talk) 20:12, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

See WP:PRIMARY. Lagtrainzzz (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

With your conflict of interest you really shouldn't be trying to spin the article at all. It is deeply unethical. Bon courage (talk) 17:56, 19 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

I will find an editor to discuss issues on the talk page. It's concerning to me that you believe. I have a conflict of interest when I am simply providing corrections from primary sources. I look forward to discussing the work soon. Soderstromverrier Soderstromverrier (talk) 22:18, 19 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Soderstromverrier! I'm The username filter bot is way too sensitive. I noticed that you added content in an article, but you cited the Wikipedia article "Adam and Eve". As per WP:NOTSOURCE, Wikipedia should not be cited as a source on Wikipedia or other Wikis. Thanks! The username filter bot is way too sensitive (talk) 19:58, 3 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Christian Science, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:47, 9 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi @Soderstromverrier, I just stumbled across the Christian Science page today and want to make some changes on it but I started a topic on the talk page there first to discuss it. I hope to work together with you soon to resolve this.

Cheers- Therealdoomcat (talk) 23:38, 10 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Did you see my reply that all of my changes are based on published sources? I do not know how to cite different pages from the same published work. Can you advise me? Then at least our discussion will have that context. Soderstromverrier Soderstromverrier (talk) 10:34, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

I would look at Wikipedia:Citing sources#Citing multiple pages of the same source if you want to learn about citing pages. I would also suggest reading the Wikipedia:Neutral point of view page as that is why a good number of your edits were being reverted by Bon courage. Also, if you haven't yet, you should check out Help:List of tutorials and introductions, particularly the introduction in the Overview Tutorials. Also, again I'd love to hear your thoughts in the talk page for Christian Science, Talk:Christian Science#Additions Made by Soderstromverrier.

Cheers- Therealdoomcat (talk) 20:34, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I too am anxious to document the subject accurately. Soderstromverrier Soderstromverrier (talk) 22:38, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Do you have any objections or thoughts on the revert I suggested on the talk page? Therealdoomcat (talk) 01:38, 12 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

I cannot see the changes you are making. I saw that some editor believes that Christian Science is not Christian and does not teach the main Christian theological points of the Atonement and Eucharist, Jesus crucifixion and resurrection, and God's forgiveness of sin. That is not accurate based on Eddy, Science and Health, page 497. Soderstromverrier (talk) 13:43, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply