Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Shortcuts WP:WINARSWP:WINARS WP:NOTSOURCEWP:NOTSOURCE WP:WINRSWP:WINRS WP:DCWOWWP:DCWOW...
Click to read more »Delete Article even use other wikipedia page as source which fails in WP:NOTSOURCE Shadow4dark (talk) 05:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Delete. Credible, until you...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP. Lack of WP:RS and WP:NOTSOURCE. The article is more of WP:PROMOTION only — Amkgp 💬 10:53, 1 December...
Click to read more »information Wikipedia or it's sister projects are not reliable source as per WP:NOTSOURCE ~Amkgp ✉ 03:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC) Keep per Atlantic306's source investigation...
Click to read more »articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online." (WP:NOTSOURCE). Reference 3 is to another Google Books page, for a book the subject...
Click to read more »Sitabo. Majority of references are from Wikipedia itself and fails per WP:NOTSOURCE. Created this here by the artist themselves as per claims at User:Purnimabna...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unreliable, tertiary source. Delete as per WP:NOTSOURCE. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/✏ 23:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Transwiki to Wikisource...
Click to read more »reference is to a non-existent blog page. If WP is the source then WP:NOTSOURCE. WP:OSE is not an valid reason to keep. // Timothy :: talk 15:36, 5...
Click to read more »Where? In the article: AGF. PamD 15:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC) @PamD: WP:NOTSOURCE. Nehme1499 15:11, 24 November 2021 (UTC) @Nehme1499: I said "it is asserted"...
Click to read more »Bishonen | talk 22:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC). @Davecarlos: please read WP:NOTSOURCE. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Delete: Six of...
Click to read more »thing. ZaperaWiki44(✉/Contribs) 13:06, 4 June 2018 (UTC) To misquote WP:NOTSOURCE, I am not a reliable source. However, I don't see anything wrong with...
Click to read more »anyone may have edited them and added incorrect information. Please see WP:NOTSOURCE. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC) @Kjklingenstein: you...
Click to read more »entire 28-point verbatim text and call it an article. It my violate WP:NOTSOURCE & WP:RECENTISM. Esyms (talk) 07:21, 3 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »everybody has to assume is this man? From another language Wikipedia? WP:NOTSOURCE. Then there is more "I believe" stuff and, this is just ridiculous, why...
Click to read more »always instant, but why is this, if that is the case? (Bearing in mind WP:NOTSOURCE.) Surely air-dried, egg, and other non-instant noodles could be made into...
Click to read more »places. Footlessmouse (talk) 03:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC) Just to add WP:NOTSOURCE, Wikipedia is not a reliable source and users are not following Wikipedia...
Click to read more »about Wikipedia, using Wikipedia as a source is allowed. As stated in WP:NOTSOURCE: An exception to this is when Wikipedia is being discussed in an article...
Click to read more »subpages) Unused template. Essentially just a ref link to Al-Aqsa Mosque (WP:NOTSOURCE) --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:56, 29 June 2021 (UTC) Delete Not a template. --WikiCleanerMan...
Click to read more »isn't the consensus of editors here on the English Wikipedia. See WP:NOTSOURCE. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:50, 17 January 2019 (UTC) Turtleturtle00 (talk ·...
Click to read more »Wikipedia articles, since Wikipedia itself cannot be used as a source (see WP:NOTSOURCE). Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:06, 14 August 2021 (UTC) How do I convert (i...
Click to read more »information Wikipedia or it's sister projects are not reliable source as per WP:NOTSOURCE ~Amkgp ✉ 03:03, 18 May 2020 (UTC) Keep per Atlantic306's source investigation...
Click to read more »(UTC) Again, I was only giving an example of editorial policy. See WP:NOTSOURCE. If the Wikipedia Foundation was issuing a press release about Wikipedia...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unreliable, tertiary source. Delete as per WP:NOTSOURCE. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/✏ 23:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Transwiki to Wikisource...
Click to read more »reference is to a non-existent blog page. If WP is the source then WP:NOTSOURCE. WP:OSE is not an valid reason to keep. // Timothy :: talk 15:36, 5...
Click to read more »places. Footlessmouse (talk) 03:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC) Just to add WP:NOTSOURCE, Wikipedia is not a reliable source and users are not following Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Where? In the article: AGF. PamD 15:09, 24 November 2021 (UTC) @PamD: WP:NOTSOURCE. Nehme1499 15:11, 24 November 2021 (UTC) @Nehme1499: I said "it is asserted"...
Click to read more »Delete Article even use other wikipedia page as source which fails in WP:NOTSOURCE Shadow4dark (talk) 05:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC) Delete. Credible, until you...
Click to read more »anyone may have edited them and added incorrect information. Please see WP:NOTSOURCE. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC) @Kjklingenstein: you...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:NCORP. Lack of WP:RS and WP:NOTSOURCE. The article is more of WP:PROMOTION only — Amkgp 💬 10:53, 1 December...
Click to read more »articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online." (WP:NOTSOURCE). Reference 3 is to another Google Books page, for a book the subject...
Click to read more »no conflict. However, this brings up a broader point. He linked to; WP:NOTSOURCE. It reads in part: "Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can...
Click to read more »(UTC) Again, I was only giving an example of editorial policy. See WP:NOTSOURCE. If the Wikipedia Foundation was issuing a press release about Wikipedia...
Click to read more »thing. ZaperaWiki44(✉/Contribs) 13:06, 4 June 2018 (UTC) To misquote WP:NOTSOURCE, I am not a reliable source. However, I don't see anything wrong with...
Click to read more »discuss this anymore.--Ermenrich (talk) 18:42, 30 July 2019 (UTC) WP:NOTSOURCE, but I am grateful for pointing my attention at these Augean stable.--Paul...
Click to read more »21 December 2019 (UTC) We don't cite Wikipedia, it's user generated WP:NOTSOURCE. Bacondrum (talk) 23:27, 21 December 2019 (UTC) There is no attack on...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unreliable, tertiary source. Delete as per WP:NOTSOURCE. dibbydib Ping me! 💬/✏ 23:29, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Transwiki to Wikisource...
Click to read more »Wikipedia. BeanieFan11 (talk) 19:01, 23 November 2025 (UTC) But Beanie, as WP:NOTSOURCE notes, wikipedia is not a reliable source, so why should this site get...
Click to read more »entire 28-point verbatim text and call it an article. It my violate WP:NOTSOURCE & WP:RECENTISM. Esyms (talk) 07:21, 3 January 2026 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »“advocacy group focused on antisemitism” ≠ civil rights group. Also WP:NOTSOURCE. Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 18:54, 11 October 2024 (UTC) I did not say...
Click to read more »Sitabo. Majority of references are from Wikipedia itself and fails per WP:NOTSOURCE. Created this here by the artist themselves as per claims at User:Purnimabna...
Click to read more »about Wikipedia, using Wikipedia as a source is allowed. As stated in WP:NOTSOURCE: An exception to this is when Wikipedia is being discussed in an article...
Click to read more »WP:NOTSLANG WP:NOTSNOPES WP:NOTSOCK WP:NOTSOGREAT WP:NOTSOLOMON WP:NOTSORRY WP:NOTSOURCE WP:NOTSPA WP:NOTSPADE WP:NOTSPE WP:NOTSPECIAL WP:NOTSPELLCHECK WP:NOTSTALE...
Click to read more »everybody has to assume is this man? From another language Wikipedia? WP:NOTSOURCE. Then there is more "I believe" stuff and, this is just ridiculous, why...
Click to read more »Wikipedia itself, and Wikipedia is not a reliable source for Wikipedia (→WP:NOTSOURCE). That seems surprising, as it was to me, too. However it is deeply based...
Click to read more »doesn't change the fact. Raladic (talk) 16:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC) But WP:NOTSOURCE so, no. And given these are exactly the arguments the closer has presumed...
Click to read more »for your assertions, perhaps it would also be a good idea to read WP:NOTSOURCE, you could go and edit the article De facto now to say that "TylerBurden...
Click to read more »figures taken from other Wikipedia pages, which is not permissible under WP:NOTSOURCE. What's more, some of those pages also rely on primary, self-published...
Click to read more »(talk) 16:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC) @TheABCDEL, please read Wikipedia:NotSource. You did not find external sources referring to the device anywhere in...
Click to read more »the article 65.92.246.77 (talk) 04:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC) Wikipedia:NotSource. Find a different reliable source. Drdr150 (talk) 16:40, 3 October 2024...
Click to read more »