You can see all open tickets related to Wikidata here. If you want to help, you can also have a look at the tasks needing a volunteer.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:22, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
{{NoACEMM}}
Hi Mike, I pinged you a couple of times on my talk page a while back, but suspect you may not have seen them. Was wonding if you're still free to work on the final couple of features of the code for the SD bot. MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
Technical news
Arbitration
Hi - I'm at work now and thus can't do it myself, but the entire 118-acre observatory is the NRHP entry, not just the telescope. Would you move the NRHP infobox back? ɱ (talk) 20:53, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Shouldn't the Research and discoveries chapter remain in the article about the Observatory? HLFan (talk) 21:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Hi, I've been experimenting over the last few days with the short description code you kindly provided, and am just about ready now to seek community approval to run what I've called ShortDescBot - essentially my expanded version of your code with a few extra tweaks to make it more flexible. For simplicity I'll leave the dating function aside for the moment and bring it back in for a later task, when it's needed. I'm not very familiar with proper version control, but I'll shortly put my code up somewhere under the same licence as yours in case anyone wants to use it. Thanks again - I definitely couldn't have got this working without your input. MichaelMaggs (talk) 18:45, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holliston Church is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Holliston Church until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 21:19, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
@Canley and 99of9: Mike, I don't understand why two (or more) Wikipedia articles) cannot have the same Commons category. There is no policy against this on Wikipedia or on Commons. Your issues seem stem from some bad modelling on Wikidata. Can I suggest that the modelling on Wikidata be fixed to allow a commons category to be associated with multiple Wikipedia articles (i.e. reality). Having spent some decades of my working life researching information modelling and meta-modelling [1], I can say with some certainty that if the model can't reflect reality, it's a bad model. Pinging some Aussie Wikidata enthusiasts who may be able to assist you with updating the modelling. Kerry (talk) 07:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
datao.net
Should I add code to the bot to assert that it's logged in before editing, or is that functionality already built in to Pywikibot? I can't see anything in the Pywikibot documentation. Also, is there a quick call I can make to return the logged-in user (so I can make sure the bot doesn't accidentally pick up the wrong details from user-config.py). I thought it might be wikipedia.user() with wikipedia as you defined it but that always seems to return None, even when I am logged in. I posted these initially at Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard#Testing_a_new_bot but maybe that's not the best place. MichaelMaggs (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
wikipedia.user()
wikipedia
None
Due to the winter holidays, the development team is taking a break and no deployment is happening for Wikidata at the moment :)
This and similar edits you have made to some article fail to address the actual categories that are needed. The cat you added now excludes the stamp of that country entirely. What is needed is both the commons categories "Stamps of ..." AND "Postal history of ..." but part of the problem is that the link to the category postal history, while correctly titled, is incorrect in the wikidata box and is called "postage stamps and postal history of ..." but it does not link to the stamps of that country at all. This needs to be fixed somehow and then both categories can be added to such article which in general are called "Postage stamps and postal history of ..." except for one I know of which I wrote Postage stamps of Ireland. With this edit I added back the commons stamps category link but in preview it shows an error due to the naming issue I mention above. I quote: "Warning: Commons category does not match the Commons sitelink on Wikidata – please check (this message is shown only in preview)". Do you know how to fix this problem? ww2censor (talk) 00:05, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Mike please stop doing this!!!. Have you LOOKED at the categories, and the article? I'll admit the divisions aren't ideal, but most images of Royal_Crown_Derby are in the wider Commons cat. I've been taking all your other changes on trust, but perhaps I shouldn't! Happy New Year anyway!! Johnbod (talk) 23:01, 31 December 2020 (UTC)