Hello, Jkrn111, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
WP:RS - please - it is not a horror movie JarrahTree 13:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
-
Hello, In that case, Categories "British horror films" and "Supernatural horror films" are wrong.
I apologize. (Jkrn111 (talk) 14:12, 1 June 2017 (UTC))[reply]
Dont to be too quick to apologise - the challenge I am offering you is - is there a WP:RS or more than one that actually determines that the movie is in fact adequately termed 'horror' ? In the days of video stores, maybe some poor bored clerk put it in horror, or - if someone got freaked out by out it, and maybe thought it was not a psychological thriller .. for me the use of Vienna. Keith Jarret and Art Garfunkel was not horror but psych thriller perhaps... Maybe there is a lot more to categories than are at first sight JarrahTree14:40, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Jkrn111. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
A lot of the langs you added to the family list as "unclassified" are actually "unclassifiable" per Glottolist. By that they mean that the lang is extinct and not enough was recorded to ever classify it -- perhaps some words or names might resemble other languages, but we can't tell if they're loans, or none of the words look like anything else, but w more data we might've discovered regular sound correspondences (as recently with the reclassification of Bijago, once a better look was taken), or maybe all we have is an observation that those people over there used to speak differently than we do -- that is, that the language is unattested. But I think by "unclassified" linguists usually mean something rather different -- there's no consensus over how to classify it for some reason, such as most of the vocab and morphology appearing to belong in one family, but with some divergent core vocabulary, or it's been classified but the evidence is weak, poorly analyzed, or has never been published, or there are competing "classifications", none of which are convincing, etc., but, with further investigation, it should be possible to classify it. — kwami (talk) 05:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it is a good idea to categorize language articles with membership in proposed families that do not yet have broad support in the linguistic community. Macro-Mayan is one such group and Totozoquean is another.·maunus · snunɐɯ· 13:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
OK. I Will Stop (Jkrn111 (talk) 13:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC))[reply]
Basque
I appreciate your doing some work on categories but you really need to slow down and focus on an area you're familiar with. There are often reasons for stuff that aren't obvious to a non-specialist. Not everyone who has ever produced a paper on Basque is a vasconist, even though some sure fancy themselves vasconists. Akerbeltz (talk) 08:58, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We just went through this. You must nominate categories for renaming at WP:CFD. You can not unilaterally decide for these categories to be renamed, and especially not in your out-of-process procedure of creating new categories and emptying the old ones. ℯxplicit23:51, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jkrn111. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hey there. I'd like to recommend that you pause a bit and only classify films which have been described by reliable sources as being art films. From art film: "An art film is typically a serious, independent film, aimed at a niche market rather than a mass market audience". You are currently classifying some mass-market Icelandic films as being art films, when that doesn't seem to fit. If the article itself doesn't mention things belonging to a category, the article should really not be categorized as such. Thank you :) – Þjarkur(talk)22:30, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I do not agree. Those were art films. Both. Could you please add some art films into Category:Icelandic art films ? It is empty now. Thanks. (Jkrn111 (talk) 01:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]
Since you don't have a reliable source classifying them as art films, your categorizations are original research. (Incorrect original research, at that). Please do take better care and only categorize things if the text in the article specifically mentions them as being such, categories also need to have a citation. Friðrik mainly made experimental films early on in his career. – Þjarkur(talk)09:58, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Look at the List of directors associated with art film. For example Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton, J. L. Mankiewicz, Vincente Minnelli and Howard Hawks (they all have references). Are their films for niche audience ? Of Course, No. It is quite easy to recognize art film, i think. (Jkrn111 (talk) 11:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)).[reply]
It's not Category:List of Icelandic films directed by someone who has made experimental films, directors have careers spanning decades and can make multiple kinds of movies. "It is quite easy to recognize art film" is original research. When categorizing, please remember to also insert a citation in the article itself. Thank you. – Þjarkur(talk) 11:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC) For Example, film "Pastoral: To Die in the Country" by idiosyncratic filmmaker Shūji Terayama was deleted (from cat. Japanaese art films) I wrote "In a 2011 case for the film's release into The Criterion Collection, Robert Nishimura lauded Pastoral: To Die in the Country as "an important film by an important filmmaker". He cited its "effortless phantasmagorical freedom" and referred to the work as "so unique and spellbinding that it transcends all classification." Is it not enough ? And there are many similar cases in my work. (Jkrn111 (talk) 11:41, 11 March 2019 (UTC))[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DannyS712 (talk) 01:15, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!18:40, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:53, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:41, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:47, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:50, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:53, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:54, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:54, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:55, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:43, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:48, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:16, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!03:34, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!03:37, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:30, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:20, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:22, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:50, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!01:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!01:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!02:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!02:15, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:25, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please follow Wikipedia's policies and guidelines concerning Verfiability at List of language families. I've twice reverted your changes, in a request for you to provide sources. If you continue, I will take you to the Administrator's Noticeboard for edit warring. Secondly, and more importantly, you may not "just cop[y] information from 'language articles'" as you stated in your edit summary at the article. The burden is not on others to "correct [your] errors", or provide sources; it's on you. Copying information is prohibited by Wikipedia's licensing requirements; see WP:COPYVIO for details. If you persist in doing this, you may be blocked. If you are copying from Wikipedia articles, that is permitted, with proper attribution; see WP:CWW for details. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 18:18, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:02, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
source/authority
You have recently changed more language articles and categories than people have breakfast in a year - you need to offer a source/claim of authority, otherwise there is no knowing why or how you are making the changes. I would suggest a speedy reply and adequate WP:RS for others to see otherwise, the process of disruptive editing looms, and ultimately blocking, if you cannot verify why and how your changes are substantiated. In anticipation of a WP:AGF and clear reply, thanks for your help. JarrahTree06:18, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
1) I create categories exclusively with the same name as existing "language group (family)" articles on English Wikipedia.
For example I created Category:Kanyara languages after existing article "Kanyara languages". Is it forbidden ? I did not know that.
2) For example Category:Galgadungic languages differed from main article "Kalkatungic languages", so i created a new category with proper name "Kalkatungic". I made many categories this way before (i think more than one hundred) and that was ok for admins. I have done about 7000 changes (almost everything is categorization). I am confused now, could You please help ? (Jkrn111 (talk) 09:19, 31 March 2020 (UTC)).[reply]
You are not saying anything about the source of the information - it simply does not come out of the ether - there has to be something to establish there is something that can verify WP:VJarrahTree09:23, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jkrn asked me to chime in. I don't see the problem either. Categories are simply a navigation device -- it doesn't matter what we call them, any more than templates or image files. We could give them binary numbers in order of creation, if that wouldn't be inconvenient for editors to use. What do RS's have to do with them?
Now if Jkrn were moving them to inconvenient or unintuitive names (like binary numbers), that would be disruptive. And it may be inconvenient to have so many nested sub-categories, rather than more articles in fewer higher-level categories. But that's POV philosophy of use, and has nothing to do with sources. If the name of an article that Jkrn has used is bad, then the article needs to be moved, but that's not Jkrn's doing.
Skimming WP:CAT, the only thing I see is, Particularly for technical subjects, use words and phrases which exist in reliable sources, so that those sources may be used to support inclusion of articles. But he's taking the names directly from the articles, so they should already be supported per the requirements of WP:TITLE, and category use is secondary. And the language articles being included are those already listed in the family articles, so there's no question as to which they should be (though of course you could always put a hat note at the top of a cat saying we're following one list or another, since no matter which source we follow, some other source will disagree with it).
I've created or moved hundreds of categories, and although ppl have sometimes reverted me or moved them to something else, AFAICR no-one's ever said anything about RS's. — kwami (talk) 12:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It is less to do with RS, and more V - there are considerable changes which have no sense of where or how any clarification can be made, I find that extraordinarily frustrating, specially when there are so few editors with either the capacity or enthusiasm to help out in clarifying or verifying the considerable volume of changes. sad. JarrahTree12:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Jkrn, I think it's reasonable for Jarrah to ask you to consult others on mass changes (though the threat of a block seems a bit much for first contact). I'm sure the two of you could work something out. Maybe just the two of you, if there aren't enough people interested for a formal discussion to be productive. E.g., 'I plan on adjusting cat X to match the hierarchy in article Y, any objections?' or s.t. like that. Personally, I find it inconvenient for navigation to have layer after layer of nested cats, each with only a few article, but it wasn't important enough to me for me to say anything to you. — kwami (talk) 13:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I think it is premature to create a Western Indonesian category. The proposal is much less secure than Greater North Borneo, and still in its initial stages. –Austronesier (talk) 14:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!15:25, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!16:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:59, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LizRead!Talk!13:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. LizRead!Talk!15:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kategorie:Kritici objektivismu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shoerack (talk) 19:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BangJan199919:33, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Hope Sandoval, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:Iberians, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please don't overcategorize by adding non-defining categoriesMason (talk) 20:46, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Gioan IIITựu nhiệm561Bãi nhiệm13 tháng 7 574Tiền nhiệmPelagius IKế nhiệmBenedict IThông tin cá nhânTên khai sinhCatelinusSinh???Roma, Đế quốc Đông La MãMất(574-07-13)13 tháng 7, 574Roma, Đế quốc Đông La MãCác giáo hoàng khác lấy tông hiệu John Gioan III (Latinh: Joannes III) là người kế nhiệm Giáo hoàng Pelagius I và là vị Giáo hoàng thứ 61 của Giáo hội Công giáo. Theo niên giám tòa thánh năm 1806 thì ông đắc c...
Cet article est une ébauche concernant un chanteur italien et l’opéra ou l’opérette. Vous pouvez partager vos connaissances en l’améliorant (comment ?) selon les recommandations des projets correspondants. Pour les articles homonymes, voir Melani. Atto MelaniBiographieNaissance 30 mars 1626PistoiaDécès 4 janvier 1714 (à 87 ans)ParisActivités Diplomate, écrivain, artiste lyriqueFratrie Jacopo MelaniAlessandro MelaniAutres informationsTessiture Castratmodifier - modifie...
У Вікіпедії є статті про інших людей із прізвищем Золотов. Павло Золотов Народження 13 листопада 1892(1892-11-13) ТаганрогСмерть 8 листопада 1979(1979-11-08) (86 років) Польща, ЛюблінКраїна УНРПриналежність Армія УНРРід військ Повітряний флот УНР Звання ПоручникВійни / б
العلاقات الصربية المالاوية صربيا مالاوي صربيا مالاوي تعديل مصدري - تعديل العلاقات الصربية المالاوية هي العلاقات الثنائية التي تجمع بين صربيا ومالاوي.[1][2][3][4][5] مقارنة بين البلدين هذه مقارنة عامة ومرجعية للدولتين: وجه المقارنة صربيا م...
Svatý Jan pod Skalou— Làng — Hiệu kỳSvatý Jan pod SkalouQuốc gia Cộng hòa SécVùngStředočeskýHuyệnBerounMúi giờCET (UTC+1) • Mùa hè (DST)CEST (UTC+2)NUTS 5CZ0202 531804 Svatý Jan pod Skalou là một làng thuộc huyện Beroun, vùng Středočeský, Cộng hòa Séc.[1] Tham khảo ^ “Struktura území ČR od 1.1.2008 do 1.1.2012 - xls”. Truy cập ngày 8 tháng 8 năm 2012. Bài viết li...
Brandi Rhodes Brandi Rhodes, c. 2011.Nombre Brandi Alexis Reed[1]Nacimiento Detroit, Míchigan, Estados Unidos[2]23 de junio de 1983 (40 años)Alma máter Universidad de Míchigan, Plymouth-Canton Educational ParkNombres artísticos BrandiBrandi Rhodes[3]Eden[4]Eden StilesEstatura 1,65 m (5′ 5″)Nacionalidad Estados UnidosResidencia Lutz Florida, Estados UnidosCónyuge Cody Rhodes (matr. 2013)EstadísticasDebut 2011[editar datos en ...
Gaya atau nada penulisan artikel ini tidak mengikuti gaya dan nada penulisan ensiklopedis yang diberlakukan di Wikipedia. Bantulah memperbaikinya berdasarkan panduan penulisan artikel. (Pelajari cara dan kapan saatnya untuk menghapus pesan templat ini) Berbagai produk Axe/Lynx. Axe adalah sebuah merek produk perawatan pria yang dimiliki perusahaan multinasional Unilever. Produk Axe diluncurkan untuk pertama kalinya pada tahun 1983 di Prancis. Axe sukses di Prancis dan dewasa ini Axe dapat den...
Basketball competition FIBA Americas Cupfor Women 201111th FIBA American Women'sBasketball ChampionshipTournament detailsHost nationColombiaDatesSeptember 24 – October 1Teams10 (from 44 federations)Venues1 (in 1 host city)Champions Brazil (5th title)MVP Érika de SouzaTournament leaders PlayersTeamsPoints Javiera Novión Nicole Louden (18.8) Brazil (79)Rebounds Vanessa Gidden Erika Gómez (8.3) Brazil (39.8)Assists Erika Valek (5.8) Brazil (16.2) O...
عبد الوهاب الأسواني معلومات شخصية الميلاد سنة 1934 جزيرة المنصورية [لغات أخرى] الوفاة 3 يناير 2019 (84–85 سنة)[1] حي مصر الجديدة[2] مواطنة مصر الحياة العملية المهنة كاتب، وأديب اللغات العربية الجوائز جائزة الدولة التقديرية في الآداب (20...
American politician For his grandfather, see Augustus Newbold Morris. Newbold MorrisParks Commissioner of New York CityIn officeMay 24, 1960 – January 15, 1966Appointed byRobert F. Wagner Jr.Preceded byRobert MosesSucceeded byThomas HovingPresident of the New York City CouncilIn office1938–1945Preceded byPosition establishedSucceeded byVincent R. Impellitteri Personal detailsBornAugustus Newbold Morris(1902-02-02)February 2, 1902New York City, New York, U.S.DiedMarch 30, 1966(196...
German politician Ralph BrinkhausMdBBrinkhaus at the 2019 CDU party congressLeader of the OppositionIn office26 October 2021 – 15 February 2022ChancellorAngela MerkelOlaf ScholzPreceded byAlexander GaulandAlice WeidelSucceeded byFriedrich MerzLeader of the CDU/CSU Group in the BundestagIn office25 September 2018 – 15 February 2022First DeputyAlexander DobrindtChief WhipMichael Grosse-BrömerThorsten FreiPreceded byVolker KauderSucceeded byFriedrich MerzMember of the Bund...
1981 video by Van MorrisonVan Morrison in IrelandVideo by Van MorrisonReleased1981RecordedFebruary 1979GenreVariousLength56:28LabelHendring Ltd./Angle Films Ltd.DirectorMike RadfordProducerRex PykeVan Morrison chronology Van Morrison in Ireland(1981) Van Morrison The Concert(1990) Van Morrison in Ireland is the first official video by Northern Irish singer-songwriter Van Morrison, released in 1981 of a concert Morrison recorded in Northern Ireland in 1979. It was directed by Michael R...
American politician (born 1944) Carolyn McCarthyMember of the U.S. House of Representativesfrom New York's 4th districtIn officeJanuary 3, 1997 – January 3, 2015Preceded byDan FrisaSucceeded byKathleen Rice Personal detailsBornCarolyn Cook (1944-01-05) January 5, 1944 (age 79)Brooklyn, New York, U.S.Political partyRepublican (Before 1996)Democratic (1996–present)Spouse Dennis McCarthy (m. 1967; died 1993)Childre...
City in California, United States City in California, United StatesLos Alamitos, CaliforniaCityLos Alamitos City Hall SealLocation of Los Alamitos within Orange County, California.Los Alamitos, CaliforniaLocation in the United StatesCoordinates: 33°48′8″N 118°3′52″W / 33.80222°N 118.06444°W / 33.80222; -118.06444CountryUnited StatesStateCaliforniaCountyOrangeIncorporatedMarch 1, 1960[1]Government • TypeCouncil-Manager • Mayor...
Ethnic group Mozabitesبني مزابPhotograph of a Mozabite, May 19, 1889Total population150,000–300,000 (2015)[1]Regions with significant populationsM'zab valley, AlgeriaLanguagesMozabite and ArabicReligionIbadi Islam[2] and JudaismRelated ethnic groupsOther Berbers[3] The Mozabite people or Banu Mzab (Arabic: بني مزاب) are a Berber ethnic group inhabiting the M'zab natural region in the northern Sahara in Algeria, numbering about 150,000 to 300,000 people....
2001 soundtrack album by various artistsLegally Blonde: Original Motion Picture SoundtrackSoundtrack album by various artistsReleasedJuly 10, 2001 (2001-07-10)Recorded2001Length38:14LabelA&MProducer Various Will AdamsE. DawkBill DeatonDino EspositoRon FairMax HsuPatrick LeonardLisa LoebJohnathan Mook Morant (also exec.)Giloh MorganKevin Richardson (exec.)RockwilderRob SchnapfJordan Schur (exec.)Roni SkiesSol SurvivorSyn-GDweezil Zappa Professional ratingsReview scor...
Chinese eCommerce website TmallType of siteE-Commerce retailAvailable inChineseOwnerAlibaba GroupCreated byJack MaURLwww.tmall.comCommercialYesLaunchedApril 2008; 15 years ago (2008-04)Current statusActive Tmall (simplified Chinese: 天猫; traditional Chinese: 天貓; pinyin: Tiānmāo), formerly Taobao Mall, is a Chinese-language website for business-to-consumer (B2C) online retail, spun off from Taobao, operated in China by Alibaba Group. I...
Yuvan Shankar Raja in 2013 Yuvan Shankar Raja made his debut in Indian music industry with the Tamil film Aravindhan. He has composed and produced film scores, soundtracks and songs for more than 170 films in various languages, predominantly in Tamil films apart from a few Telugu, Kannada and Hindi films.[1] As composer Feature films 1990s Year Film Language Notes Ref(s) 1997 Aravindhan Tamil Tamil Debut [2] 1998 Velai Kalyana Galatta 1999 Poovellam Kettuppar [3] Unakk...
British TV series or programme Hitler's British GirlHitler's British Girl title cardGenreDocumentaryDirected byRichard BondNarrated byRamon TikaramComposerSam HooperCountry of originUnited KingdomOriginal languageEnglishProductionExecutive producerDenys BlakewayProducerRichard BondOriginal releaseNetworkChannel 4Release20 December 2007 (2007-12-20) Hitler's British Girl is a Channel 4 documentary film about British Nazi sympathiser Unity Mitford and her relationship with A...
Strategi Solo vs Squad di Free Fire: Cara Menang Mudah!