User talk:Jenjadeben

Hello, Jenjadeben. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page

User talk:Jenjadeben

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Jenjadeben. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page CafePress, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. If you happen to be associated with CafePress, please be patient with your suggestions on the talk page and allow other editors to attend to them. Sometimes it takes a while before that happens. Thank you. Stefen 𝕋ower HuddleHandiwerk 02:09, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Yes, as I have identified on the CafePress Talk page:
== Conflict of interest disclosure ==
I am currently employed by CafePress which is one of the brands owned by PlanetArt, and therefore have a conflict of interest under Wikipedia guidelines. I am proposing edits on the Talk page to improve factual accuracy and sourcing, particularly regarding ownership history and chronology, and I invite independent editors to review and implement them as appropriate.
I am completely new to this experience and have no interest in "branding" or "marketing" either PlanetArt, CafePress, Personal Creations or any of the other brands other PlanetArt. I simply want to correct inaccurate information on Wikipedia and ideally create a Wiki page for PlanetArt - that can literally be two sentences - to help clarify the brands. Personal Creations is under the ProFlowers Wiki page, for example, but PlanetArt has owned Personal Creations since 2019. CafePress is based in Calabasas, not Kentucky, and was delisted from the NYSE years ago. So unfortunately, Wikipedia is currently a web of inaccurate information - the opposite of an encylopedia - and I am simply trying to correct those to details. I can be as straightforward as you like - no marketing language required. Jenjadeben (talk) 15:07, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: PlanetArt (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Epluribusunumyall were:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:19, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jenjadeben! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Epluribusunumyall (talk) 03:19, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:PlanetArt

Information icon Hello, Jenjadeben. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PlanetArt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:09, 23 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:PlanetArt

Hello, Jenjadeben. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "PlanetArt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:18, 21 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.