Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the last ten minutes you've made two edits to The New York Times, the first removing 48k from the page and the second removing 33k from the page, neither of which were with edit summaries. You have been warned repeatedly for this before. If you make any more edits to The New York Times or its child articles without using an edit summary, I will be bringing you to a behavioural noticeboard. Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Sideswipe9th--you just beat me to it. I was also wondering whether to just hit rollback on those huge changes. Is this editor of good faith? Are they improving the article? I remember having looked at this before, and I think you've pinged me from the talk page at some point--but what I also see is significant pushback against their comments and edits. (FWIW I think the article is inflated and needs pruning, but that's another matter.) Drmies (talk) 17:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies: it's really hard to tell. From a skim Elijah has removed at least 80k of sources from the article in the last ten minutes. Now it's possible these sources were unused in the article body, in which case these edits would be an improvement, but without a substantial time investment to verify each one by hand due to the lack of justification in an edit summary it's nigh-on impossible to tell. Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Is this editor of good faith? Are they improving the article? I remember having looked at this before, and I think you've pinged me from the talk page at some point--but what I also see is significant pushback against their comments and edits. I think I may have pinged you before, @Drmies. But we've repeatedly circled around the same thing for the last couple months. Elijah makes edits without consensus or summaries, people discuss, elijah ignores it/promises to fix things. Repeat the cycle N days later.
I'm currently quite burnt out on this article, but it's impossible to make any progress with things when this keeps happening. Last time landed us in ANI with no actual changes. So we had a full consensus of "These are options for how to split article, please discuss" to not repeat that. A few weeks later, Elijah again ignores the decision to do his own thing (for presumably GA credits).
At this point, does good faith matter if they're very clearly making things worse for every other editor? I genuinely do not know. I do know that I'm all out of patience for Elijah's antics. Soni (talk) 17:17, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Rest assured that I won't edit the Times article if making beneficial changes warrants a noticeboard. I planned on expanding a few sections today; that clearly won't be happening.elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)17:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Elijah, without an edit summary we don't know this edit is beneficial. How do we distinguish this from someone blanking an article or article sections? Do you know how long it takes to read through multiple diffs of this length? You have been warned on this multiple times, by multiple editors. Why are you not using edit summaries? Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have been warned before. I don't know why you would think you can make truly massive edits without explaining; surely you've noticed that this is a collaborative project. And you are still not explaining what you are doing--Sideswipe9th, if you want to roll these back, go for it. I have no clue why they removed those sources. Drmies (talk) 17:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't even make edits that have nothing to do with content to remove references that weren't used and added size to the article, the exact issue everyone is attempting to resolve. Stopping others from doing their work is not beneficial. I'm disappointed that I couldn't expand the article and that it will likely remain in its state for months, if not years. If everyone is pressuring me to quit editing altogether—attempting to get me blocked—maybe I should consider that option. I've already stated that the work there is no longer mine. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)17:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've been following this on-and-off since I saw you were working on improving the article for The New York Times, and I hope you understand that no one here wants to chase you away from editing about The Times, or from the project entirely. The issue is your attitude towards collaboration in general, and it's manifested here because this is an article many people care about. If you use edit summaries and engage substantively in discussion when challenged, there won't be any sort of problem. Please, please, just listen to other people when they give you feedback about your edits. The community is not out to get you; we just want to collaborate. Elli (talk | contribs) 21:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies: I honestly dunno. If they are actually unused references, then removing them is fine. But the underlying behavioural problems here, ignoring consensus, ignoring the reasons why he was repeatedly warned and blocked previously, those need some sort of admin response I feel. All of this, my warning, your talk page discussion, could have been entirely avoided if Elijah had done what he was supposed to do, and used an edit summary with each of those edits. Something that he knows or should know he should be doing, because he's been blocked before for not using them. Sideswipe9th (talk) 17:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
I undid the speedy deletion solely because I believe it to be too controversial considering the opposition to blanking/redirecting it. Noah, BSBATalk12:08, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. I saw your piece on Christian theology in the US, tying together the Louisiana and Oklahoma situations. I think you are on the right track with this, please do flesh it out and keep building. Best regards, —tim //// Carrite (talk) 03:50, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your contributions to Merger of Paramount Global and Skydance Media. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because Premature. Content should be added to main articles and split when appropriate..
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
The sentence "the former United States president Donald Trump" is grammatically correct. If it were not the sentence "the American television show The Walking Dead" would also be grammatically incorrect. Clearly it is not; it is a perfectly ordinary sentence.
I encourage you to read about false titles and journalese. Wikipedia is not an American news website; we do not use false titles and shorthands to sensationalise the content of an article. It is also not a newspaper; we do not use them to save space, either.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biden crisis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Thanks for your contributions to Response to the 2024 Venezuelan presidential election. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
I understand that articles on rapidly developing events can be chaotic and can lead to back-and-forth reverting at rates that are higher than typical for stable articles. However, please keep in mind that this sort of thing is a bit more strictly handled in the Arab-Israeli conflict area than it is in other areas.
Generally speaking, summarizing court opinions is OR because it involves interpreting the meaning of particular holdings. You should find reliable sources that summarize the holding of the case, of which there are many.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Voorts}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2024 stock market decline requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — ♠ Ixtal( T / C ) ⁂ Sign up for the 2024 DCWC! — Non nobis solum ♠ 14:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 stock market decline until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Please do not create all of these articles that are just a blip on the nightly news. They seem to get tagged for an AFD discussion within a day and many of them are deleted. It's a waste of editors' time debating them. Have a better filter and only create articles on events that have lasting significance. That typically takes more than a few hours or a day to determine this. You aren't getting bonus points from creating these articles so quickly, in fact, it is damaging your reputation if the current AFD is any indication. Thank you. LizRead!Talk!07:13, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petteway v. Galveston County until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Canada railway shutdown until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Mexican judicial reform until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Thanks for your contributions to 2024 Zamfara State boat accident. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trump International Golf Club shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Speedy deletion nomination of Succession of Rupert Murdoch
Hello ElijahPepe,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Succession of Rupert Murdoch for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.
If you don't want Succession of Rupert Murdoch to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2024 Israeli invasion of Lebanon. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2024 Israeli ground operation in Lebanon. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2024 Israeli ground operation in Lebanon. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Thanks, Wikieditor019 (Talk to me) 19:50, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Israel–Hezbollah war until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, 2024 Israel–Hezbollah war. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Israel–Hezbollah conflict (2023–present). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:33, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Elijah, seriously, come on dude. stop making current events articles without doing even the bare minimum to check whether it's a duplicate/CFORK or even notable. ... sawyer * he/they * talk17:44, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, ElijahPepe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2024 University of California academic workers' strike, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
You are the crator of the article Tesla Network. I subsequently added content and attempted to improve that article. The article has now been AfD'd for potential merging into Tesla Cybercab.
I am not expert on this, but I am pretty sure Tesla has been talking about this "network" and their own ride-hailing service—that would be exclusive/proprietary to them for Tesla vehicles using Tesla self-driving software—for some years now. I would expect that there are references to this in old quarterly calls, or in one or more of the "investor days" or "battery days" that they've held as public events.
So if you want the article to remain, you may want to find some of those sources and improve the Tesla Network article with a fuller/richer and longer history of the concept, and with more sources talking about it. Cheers. N2e (talk) 03:10, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I want to be careful about what I say. However, I can state that Tesla is working on a ride-hailing service that is intended to be integrated into the app. Musk has mentioned this several times, including his second Master Plan. The plan is to have a fleet of vehicles, including existing models, that can autonomously function as Ubers. As far as I know, "Tesla Network" is a placeholder name. I'm not against merging the article because the topic has no coverage, but I created it in order to maintain an article about the Robovan. I am aware that specific details about Tesla's network have been publicly stated. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)04:08, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not against merging the article because the topic has no coverage, but I created it in order to maintain an article about the Robovan. a) you shouldn't create articles on topics with no coverage. b) what do you mean you "created it in order to maintain an article about the Robovan"? you've already created a separate article about the Tesla Robovan, which is a two-sentence stub that doesn't at all demonstrate notability. once again i'm going to ask you to stop making articles about current events (and future events) with no indication of any lasting significance. ... sawyer * he/they * talk15:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't create the article on the Robovan. I created a redirect that Bdebbarma converted into an article, which I disagree with. I created Tesla Network to have an article to include information about the Robovan as part of the fleet of Tesla robotaxis. At the time, I believed that there was more to discuss—in other words, information about the Tesla Network would emerge. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)15:36, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
apologies for assuming you made the article about the Robovan. however, the rest of my comment stands - please just use draftspace. ... sawyer * he/they * talk15:42, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Combs sexual misconduct allegations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025–2026 U.S. troop withdrawal from Iraq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
7.62 mm T93 Sniper RifleSúng bắn tỉa T93LoạiSúng bắn tỉaNơi chế tạo Trung Hoa Dân QuốcLược sử hoạt độngPhục vụ2009 - ?Sử dụng bởi Trung Hoa Dân QuốcLược sử chế tạoNgười thiết kế205th ArmoryNăm thiết kế2003Giai đoạn sản xuất2008-2009Thông sốĐạn7,62×51 mm NATOCơ cấu hoạt độngThoi nạp đạn trượtTầm bắn hiệu quảHơn 800 m (đạn bình thường/đạn chuyên cho bắn tỉa)Chế đ
Alem Toskić Datos personalesNacimiento Priboj, Yugoslavia12 de febrero de 1982 (41 años)Nacionalidad(es) Serbia SerbiaAltura 1,90 m (6′ 3″)Carrera deportivaDeporte BalonmanoClub profesionalPosición Pívot Medallero Serbia Serbia Balonmano masculino Europeo PlataSerbia 2012Serbia [editar datos en Wikidata] Alem Toskić (Priboj, 12 de febrero de 1982) es un exjugador de balonmano ...
Історія Туркменістану Маргіана Імперія Ахеменідів Династія Сасанідів Тахіриди Саманіди Сельджуцька імперія Шахи Хорезму Монгольське завоювання Середньої Азії Хівинське ханство Закаспійська область Громадянська війна в Росії Туркестанська Автономна Радянська С...
Sawah berteras di hulu Cipamingkis, Sukamakmur, Kabupaten Bogor Sawah dari jarak dekat Sawah berteras di Bali Sawah di Vietnam. Sawah adalah tanah yang digarap dan diairi untuk tempat menanam padi.[1] Untuk keperluan ini, sawah harus mampu menyangga genangan air karena padi memerlukan penggenangan pada periode tertentu dalam pertumbuhannya. Untuk mengairi sawah digunakan sistem irigasi dari mata air, sungai atau air hujan. Sawah yang terakhir dikenal sebagai sawah tadah hujan, sementa...
Military campaign during the American Civil War For the historic landmark, see Camden Expedition Sites National Historic Landmark. This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Camden Expedition – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message...
Coup d'état that failed in its attempt to put an end to Primo de Rivera's dictatorship.The 1926 Spanish coup d'état, also known as the Sanjuanada because it was planned to take place on the night of June 24, the Night of San Juan, was an unsuccessful attempt to overthrow the dictatorship of Primo de Rivera, who had been installed in Spain by another coup d'état in September 1923. It was the first coup d'état attempt against the regime.[1] Background Eduardo González Calleja has s...
Panerusan KulonDesaNegara IndonesiaProvinsiJawa TengahKabupatenBanjarnegaraKecamatanSusukanKode pos53475Kode Kemendagri33.04.01.2006 Jumlah penduduk-Kepadatan- IPM/HDI: 0,742 ( Tinggi) Panerusan Kulon adalah desa di kecamatan Susukan, Banjarnegara, Jawa Tengah, Indonesia. Pranala luar (Indonesia) Keputusan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 050-145 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemberian dan Pemutakhiran Kode, Data Wilayah Administrasi Pemerintahan, dan Pulau tahun 2021 (Indonesia) Peraturan Menteri Dalam ...
2008 video gameMercenaries 2: World in FlamesDeveloper(s)Pandemic StudiosArtificial Mind and Movement (PS2)LTI Gray Matter (PC)[1]Publisher(s)Electronic ArtsDirector(s)Cameron BrownProducer(s)David BakerDesigner(s)Scott WarnerProgrammer(s)John NorthanJason L. Maynard, Daniel Zahn & Chris Farrar (PC)[1]Artist(s)Amie Haemi HongWriter(s)Matthew Colville[1]Composer(s)Chris TiltonSeriesMercenariesEngineZeroPlatform(s)Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 2, PlayStation 3, Xbox...
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Garden Grove High School – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Public school in Garden Grove, California, United StatesGarden Grove High SchoolGarden Grove High School in Garden Grove, ...
This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Ringwood Secondary College – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (September 2023) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Public school in Ringwood, Victoria, AustraliaRingwood Secondary CollegeLocationRingwood, VictoriaAustraliaCoordinates37°48′59″S 14...
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.Find sources: Conselheiro Pena – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (January 2008) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Place in Southeast, BrazilConselheiro PenaMatriz Square FlagSealLocation in Minas GeraisCountryBrazilRegionSoutheastStateMinas Ger...
حرب زيورخ القديمة / Alter Zürichkrieg سويسرا الشرقية في منتصف القرن الخامس عشر: أقاليم المدينة الامبراطورية زيورخ (تُظهر كيبورغ) أقاليم زيبين أورته من الاتحاد السويسري القديم ارتباطات الاتحاد السويسر...
SarsaSarsa in 2019Background informationBirth nameMarta MarkiewiczAlso known as Sarsa Markiewicz Born (1989-06-13) 13 June 1989 (age 34)Słupsk, PolandGenres Electropop indie pop Occupation(s) Singer songwriter record producer composer Instrument(s) Vocals guitar ukulele piano Years active2010–presentLabelsUniversal Music PolskaWebsitehttps://www.sarsa.com.pl/Musical artist Sarsa (2015) Marta Markiewicz (born 13 June 1989), better known as Sarsa or Sarsa Markiewicz, is a Polish singer,...
Human settlement in ScotlandKinlochlevenScottish Gaelic: Ceann Loch LìobhannKinlochlevenKinlochlevenLocation within the Lochaber areaPopulation760 (mid-2020 est.)[1]OS grid referenceNN186618Council areaHighlandCountryScotlandSovereign stateUnited KingdomPost townKINLOCHLEVENPostcode districtPH50Dialling code01855PoliceScotlandFireScottishAmbulanceScottish UK ParliamentRoss, Skye and LochaberScottish ParliamentSkye, Lochaber and Badeno...
عبد الله بن عون الخراز معلومات شخصية تاريخ الوفاة 232 هـ الإقامة بغداد مواطنة الدولة العباسية الحياة العملية المهنة مُحَدِّث اللغات العربية تعديل مصدري - تعديل أبو محمد عبد الله بن عون بن عبد الملك بن يزيد الهلالي البغدادي، محدث من الثقات، كان يعد من الأبدا...
Indian politician Sangam Lal GuptaMember of Parliament, Lok SabhaIncumbentAssumed office 23 May 2019Preceded byHarivansh SinghConstituencyPratapgarhNational General Secretary, BJP OBC MorchaIncumbentAssumed office 22 March 2021Member of the Uttar Pradesh Legislative AssemblyIn office2017–2019Preceded byNagendra Singh Personal detailsBorn (1971-04-01) 1 April 1971 (age 52)Katra Medniganj, Uttar Pradesh, IndiaPolitical partyBharatiya Janata Party (since 2019)Other politicalaffili...
Elephant gate and Lion gate Lion Gate is a locality in Mumbai, India. The old heritage building of the Naval Dockyard starts from Lion Gate. References Heritage Walk in Naval Dockyard, Mumbai from Indian Navy This Mumbai location article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.vte
Sigmund Freud, pencetus gagasan id, ego dan super-ego. Id, ego dan super-ego adalah struktur psikis yang terpisah tetapi saling berinteraksi. Konsep ini dirumuskan oleh Sigmund Freud. Id, ego dan super-ego merupakan konstruksi teoretis yang mendeskripsikan aktivitas dan interaksi mental manusia. Menurut konsep ini, id adalah sejumlah tren insting yang tidak terkoordinasi; super-ego memainkan peran kritis dan moral; sementara ego adalah bagian yang terorganisasi dan realistis yang menengahi ha...
Golf club in Lincolnshire, England 53°09′29″N 0°12′25″W / 53.158°N 0.207°W / 53.158; -0.207 Woodhall Spa Golf Club11th hole on the Hotchkin CourseClub informationLocationWoodhall Spa, Lincolnshire, EnglandWebsitewww.woodhallspagolf.com Woodhall Spa Golf Club is a private golf club in England that is located to the north of Woodhall Spa, Lincolnshire. The club was founded in 1891. In 1995 the club was purchased by the English Golf Union,[1] who have ...
Strategi Solo vs Squad di Free Fire: Cara Menang Mudah!
