My talk page archives:
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:57, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Suna Kıraç requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DrStrauss talk 16:15, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading File:CumhuriyetLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've reviewed the above nomination and have a query. Snuggums (talk / edits) 18:09, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 13 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Refik Erduran, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that playwright and journalist Refik Erduran's fourth marriage, to his third wife's daughter from an earlier marriage, was annulled after six years by court decision for being immoral? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Refik Erduran. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Refik Erduran), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:31, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission of Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 2 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lake Meke, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lake Meke (pictured), a crater lake beside a volcanic cone, is a natural monument and a Ramsar site in Turkey? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lake Meke. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lake Meke), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 00:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ich sehe, dass mein dein deutsches Konto auf de:Benutzer:CharlieGolf~dewiki verschoben hat. Korrekturen kann wohl de:Benutzer:Hexer machen. Ich habe de:Strafvollzugsanstalten Silivri angelegt und ein Foto von dir verwendet. Danke! -- Draffi (talk) 21:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 7 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when completed in June 2017, Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower will replace most of the steel communications masts in the area, which cause visual pollution? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Küçük Çamlıca TV Radio Tower), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Palandöken Ski Center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slalom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brian Dunford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Dunford until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 07:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 9 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Northern Marmara and Değirmenköy (Silivri) Depleted Gas Reservoir, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Northern Marmara and Değirmenköy (Silivri) Depleted Gas Reservoir is currently the only operational underground natural gas storage facility in Turkey? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Northern Marmara and Değirmenköy (Silivri) Depleted Gas Reservoir. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Northern Marmara and Değirmenköy (Silivri) Depleted Gas Reservoir), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Aysun Aliyeva, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC) Celestina007 (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A tag has been placed on Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Celestina007 (talk) 21:47, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 21 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article MT GDF Suez Neptune, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the MT GDF Suez Neptune, a floating production storage and offloading vessel, serves as Turkey's first floating liquified natural gas storage facility? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/MT GDF Suez Neptune. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, MT GDF Suez Neptune), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Kula Volcanic Geopark at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 06:33, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I didn't forget about it, but I didn't have time to work on it. Will get to it shortly. Thanks for your patience. I re-posted it on the Approved page. Best, Yoninah (talk) 09:54, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 27 April 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Karşıyaka Tram, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the newly-opened Karşıyaka Tram will be free of charge for its first 50 days? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Karşıyaka Tram. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Karşıyaka Tram), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Mosque of Uşak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Central. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 2 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kula Volcanic Geopark, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the volcanic area of Kula Geopark was mentioned by the Ancient Greek geographer Strabo in the encyclopedia Geographica as Katakekaumene, literally "Burnt Land"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kula Volcanic Geopark. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kula Volcanic Geopark), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 01:12, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 10 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex hosts a museum that exhibits handmade meerschaum pipes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Kurşunlu Mosque and Complex), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Mifter (talk) 04:53, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you write in 2007 that Ahmet Ayik was "the only wrestler Aleksandr Medved was unable to beat?" Please see Wrestling at the 1964 Summer Olympics, and 1966 World Wrestling Championships. Regards Tapered (talk) 07:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merhabalar CeeGee. Müsait b,r zamanınızda 2016'da açılışı yapılan Riva Tüneli ve Çamlık Tüneli'nin ingilizce sayfalarını oluşturabilir misiniz? Teşekkürler tüm emekleriniz için. --Lpxl (talk) 06:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 06:32, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 25 May 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ulubey Canyon Nature Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the glass-floor observation deck of Ulubey Canyon Nature Park is 131 m (430 ft) above the canyon floor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ulubey Canyon Nature Park. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ulubey Canyon Nature Park), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC) [reply]
hi , dear your table isnt correct. http://deaflympics2017.org/en/results - swimming : 7 + 7 + 7 + 6 + 7 + 7 =41 gold not 69 , thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportsloverrr (talk • contribs) 07:14, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
also taekwondo 5+4+4 =13 gold . pomse 5 events , individual and team in men and women. pair only one gold. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sportsloverrr (talk • contribs) 07:18, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
2017 Summer Transplant Games - thanks a lot , dear user can creat this page? i dont know, pls create it . i am complete it . i am create medal table of it :
i am not turkish, but i know a few turkish language. chokh tashakor ediram. thanks.Sportsloverrr (talk) 13:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 24 July 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Samsun Golf Course, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Samsun Golf Course is thought to be the first course in the world to be built on ground recovered from the sea? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Samsun Golf Course. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Samsun Golf Course), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
IronGargoyle (talk) 12:02, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Batuhan Akay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Batuhan Akay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mahsum Akkuş is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahsum Akkuş until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Taylan Anlar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taylan Anlar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
The article Sera Doğramacı has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NHOCKEY.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
{{proposed deletion/dated}}
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article İlksen Şermin Özdemir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/İlksen Şermin Özdemir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:13, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sinem Yalçındağ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinem Yalçındağ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Çisel Ann Otts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Çisel Ann Otts until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yosemiter (talk) 20:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eray Atalı is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eray Atalı until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ferhat Bakal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ferhat Bakal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tolga Bozacı is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tolga Bozacı until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aslı Çukurkavaklı is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aslı Çukurkavaklı until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cengiz Gök is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cengiz Gök until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sera Doğramacı is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sera Doğramacı until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fatih Faner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fatih Faner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 13:13, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Doruk Kamış has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NHOCKEY
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:58, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Yavuz Karakoç has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article Yusuf Kars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Serkan Gümüş is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serkan Gümüş until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:17, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alec Koçoğlu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alec Koçoğlu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andy Koçoğlu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Koçoğlu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tanay Günay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tanay Günay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:31, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kübra Dadaşoğlu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kübra Dadaşoğlu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:32, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betül Kahraman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betül Kahraman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yusuf Halil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yusuf Halil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alper Solak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alper Solak until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:38, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nil Eryılmaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nil Eryılmaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Mine Güngör has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mine Güngör is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mine Güngör until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 19:52, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Gökhun Öztürk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Emrah Savaş has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article Serdar Semiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article Sefa Kavaz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article Fatih Taygar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Barış Coşkun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barış Coşkun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:00, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gürkan Çetinkaya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gürkan Çetinkaya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emre Faner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emre Faner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
The article Ceren Alkan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:01, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Sinem Doğu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article Tuba Dokur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yavuz Karakoç is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yavuz Karakoç until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yosemiter (talk) 18:56, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ceren Alkan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceren Alkan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sinem Doğu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinem Doğu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuba Dokur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuba Dokur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
The article Tuğçe Melis Demir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Contested prod, fails WP:NHOCKEY.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maria Jasmina Decu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Jasmina Decu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:06, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seda Demir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seda Demir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:07, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Çağla Baktıroğlu has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuğçe Melis Demir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuğçe Melis Demir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Huriye Yeliz Yüksel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:09, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Erol Kahraman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Tarık Göçmen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Deniz İnce has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article Refika Yılmaz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Betül Tayğar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:28, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Burcu Turanal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The article Elif Ulaş has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The article Fulya Yurt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fulya Yurt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fulya Yurt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elif Ulaş is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elif Ulaş until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burcu Turanal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burcu Turanal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betül Tayğar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betül Tayğar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Refika Yılmaz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Refika Yılmaz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Huriye Yeliz Yüksel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Huriye Yeliz Yüksel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:38, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Çağla Baktıroğlu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Çağla Baktıroğlu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erol Kahraman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erol Kahraman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:15, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Enkaspor branches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:38, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Ömer Halisdemir, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
Onel5969 TT me 12:32, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 20 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Evin Demirhan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that as a high school student, Evin Demirhan supported her family of 13 by wrestling, and later became a bronze medalist in the 2017 World Wrestling Championships? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Evin Demirhan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Evin Demirhan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 26 September 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ömer Halisdemir, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sergeant Ömer Halisdemir was killed on the spot after he shot dead a general who had tried to take over the Special Forces Command HQ during the 2016 Turkish coup d'état attempt? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ömer Halisdemir. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ömer Halisdemir), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Maile (talk) 13:17, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know of any template in English like this "{{Atatürk anıtları}}" Turkish wikipedia template?--TheWaves (talk) 19:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission of Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! starship.paint ~ KO 08:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Women and disability Healthcare Geofocus: Nordic countries
#1day1woman Global Initiative
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)
--Ipigott (talk) 10:08, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on women during this month for your region or wherever please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the sub lists by continent at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:26, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I left a message for you at Talk:Poets' Sofa Park.--TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 01:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
--TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 22:12, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Someone left a "cite sources template" on hte page Abdi İpekçi Park, however the page is translated from the original Turkish page. Doesn't that make the cite sources thing not apply? The original Turkish article has a source, but simply copying sources is against protocol because you need to have accessed the source yourself to add it.--TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 14:07, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I ask because I plan to translate more pages in the future. --TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 14:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 9 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Mehmetçik", the common name for Ottoman and Turkish soldiers, is thought to commemorate Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş, who fought during the Gallipoli Campaign in 1915? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bigalı Mehmet Çavuş), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The page Fethi Sekin which you helped with has been marked with a notability alert. I believe that the pages notability is beyond any reasonable doubt. The sources provided are also relatively diverse. What can we do?--TheWindInTheTrees (talk) 18:03, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Three articles Eren Bülbül, TAMEK, Valley of the Wolves: Homeland, that you helped create have been nominated for deletion. We believe that there is a good case to be made for keeping these articles. If/when you have time, you may decide to voice your opinion on the matter. Thanks!--ErenUygur (talk) 13:40, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 21 October 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Melahat Okuyan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Melahat Okuyan, a Turkish female microbiologist and AIDS activist, once proposed the establishment of male brothels for homosexuals and cross-dressers in order to improve public health? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Melahat Okuyan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Melahat Okuyan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
New: The Women in Red World Contest Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
-Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abdi İpekçi Park is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdi İpekçi Park until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Just Chilling (talk) 23:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, any chance you could red link some missing notable Turkish women bios?♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:59, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Bu satirdan sonrakileri kopyalayabilirsiniz direk.
{{Sculpture | image_file =Antalya - Statue of Ataturk.jpg | image_size = 250px | title = National Ascension Monument | other_language_1 = [[Turkish language|Turkish]] | other_title_1 = Ulusal Yükseliş Anıtı | artist = Prof. Dr. [[Hüseyin Gezer]] | year = 1964 | medium = [[Bronze]] | city = [[Antalya]] | length_metric = 600 |subject = [[Atatürk]] | museum = |coordinates = 36°53'12"N 30°42'11"E }} The '''National Ascension Monument''' ([[Turkish language|Turkish]]:''Ulusal Yükseliş Anıtı'') is an Atatürk monument by Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Gezer in 1964 located in [[Antalya]] [[Turkey]]. It has been described as one of Turkeys most meaningful monuments. The monument represents with a sudden rising base and figures right on the edge, the unity, and leadership of [[Ataturk]] leading Turkey through a series of victories leading up to the foundation of the [[Turkish Republic]]. ==Description== It is made of 12 tonnes of Bronze and is six meters high. The base is a concrete shell with concrete columns under the bronze figures, within the base, supporting the 12 tonnes of bronze. The base of the statue contains dates starting from 19 May 1919 including the many victories during the founding of the new Turkish state, including the revolutions giving the new state its modernity, these steps represented by the different levels in the base. Ataturk at the top flanked by a boy and a girl representing the youth of the nation and the trust that they have received. It's one of the most meaningful monuments in Turkey. ==History== The president of the Ataturk Monument Creations Organisation, Muharrem Önal Bey and the [[architect]] Tarık Akıltopu organised a contest for the monument. 28 projects entered into the contest and Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Gezers project was chosen. While the monument was being built, a proper location was being searched for in [[Antalya]]. Eventually the Republic Square ([[Turkish language|Turkish]]:Cumhuriyet Meydanı) was chosen. After the location was chosen the architect Tarık Akıltopu started to work on the foundation/base of the monument. The granite stones for the base were brought from [[Yenice]]. The monument which was funded completely from donations, was unveiled in 19 May, 1964. In 2014 the monument was extensively cleaned. ==References== *{{cite web |url=http://www.isteataturk.com/haber/4509/ulusal-yukselis-aniti-antalya |title=Ulusal Yükseliş Anıtı, Antalya |last=Çimrin |first=Hüseyin |date={{date|Jun 16, 2010|dmy}} |website=IsteAtaturk.com |publisher= |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}} |language=[[Turkish language|Turkish]] |quote=}} *{{cite news |last= |first= |language=[[Turkish language|Turkish]] |date={{date|Feb 08, 2014|dmy}} |title=Antalya'daki Atatürk Anıtı bakıma alındı |url=http://www.ensonhaber.com/antalyadaki-ataturk-aniti-bakima-alindi-2014-02-08.html |agency=EnSonHaber |website=EnSonHaber.com |work= |location= |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}} }} *{{cite web |title=Ulusal Yükseliş Anıtı (Antalya) |language=[[Turkish language|Turkish]] |url=http://wikimapia.org/1556567/tr/Ulusal-Y%C3%BCkseli%C5%9F-An%C4%B1t%C4%B1 |website=wikimapia.com |work= |location= |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}} }} *{{cite web |last=McLernon |first=Jill |title=National ascension monument |url=https://www.travelblog.org/Photos/9185721 |website=travelblog.org |work= |location= |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}}}} *{{cite web |last=Gezer |first=Hüseyin |date= |title=National Ascension Monument Antalya |url=https://www.travelblog.org/Photos/9185722 |website=travelblog.org |work= |location= |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}}}} *{{cite journal |last1=Sanem ÇINAR ALTINÇEKİÇ |language=[[Turkish language|Turkish]] |first1=H |last2=DOKTUR |first2=Buket |date={{date|Jun 17, 2016|dmy}} |title=Yayalaştırılmış Bir Bölge: Antalya-Cumhuriyet Caddesi |url=http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/324205 |journal= Journal of Forestry Faculty |volume=17 |issue=1 |pages=60 |doi=10.17475/kastorman.296494 |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}} }} *{{cite web |url=http://www.fullantalya.com/antalyanin-heykelleriulusal-yukselis-aniti/ |title=ANTALYA’NIN HEYKELLERİ:ULUSAL YÜKSELİŞ ANITI |last= |language=[[Turkish language|Turkish]] |first= |date={{date|July 12, 2011|dmy}} |website= |publisher=FULL ANTALYA |access-date={{date|Oct 15, 2017|dmy}} |quote=}} {{Atatürk Monuments}} [[:Category:Outdoor sculptures in Turkey]] [[:Category:Sculptures in Turkey]] [[:Category:Sculptures]] [[:Category:1964 sculptures]] {{reflist}}
Hi! I can't understand why you changed Çetinkaya, Sivas to Çetinkaya, Kangal, when no other "Çetinkaya" exists within the Sivas Province. Since Çetinkaya is not a part of the Kangal urban area, the proper naming is the province, not the district. For example, Fenerbahçe, Kadıköy would be correct, because Fenerbahçe is a neighborhood with the Kadıköy urban area. This can be seen for example in Burr Ridge, Illinois, when there is only one village of that name in a state/province. When there are more than one in the same state/province, then the district/county name is included, for example Windsor, Mercer County, Illinois. Best regards. (Central Data Bank (talk) 15:13, 29 October 2017 (UTC))[reply]
On 15 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fatma Hikmet İşmen, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in her first senate speech, socialist politician Fatma Hikmet İşmen accused the Directorate of Religious Affairs of fueling discrimination against Alawites by Sunni Muslims? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fatma Hikmet İşmen. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Fatma Hikmet İşmen), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi,You have changed two images in Commons which I've used two days ago. When I compared the older and the newer versions the only difference I've seen is their resolution. It has shriked from about 3 Mb to to 50 kB. The obvious question is why ? Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:19, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
New: "Seasonal celebrations" "First Ladies" "Go local!" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative Remember the World Contest closes on Thursday, 30 November
--Ipigott (talk) 11:14, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
On 28 November 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mustafa Tuna, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mustafa Tuna, the newly-elected mayor of Ankara, was previously an academic in environmental technology? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mustafa Tuna. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Mustafa Tuna), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ayla Kalkandelen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayla Kalkandelen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — kashmiri TALK 20:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, CeeGee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
AS one of Wikipedia's most experienced editors, Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. ~~~~
A tag has been placed on Aysun Aliyeva, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:10, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Your submission of Ramize Erer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! -Apocheir (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
New: "Prisoners" New: "Fashion designers" New: "Geofocus: Great Britain and Ireland" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]
Hello:
The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Ramize Erer has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:01, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]