User talk:Cathodography

Your good article nomination of the article Construção (song) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more inform

User talk:Cathodography

Your nomination of Construção (song) is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article Construção (song) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 14:42, 21 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Construção (song) has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Construção (song) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 23:22, 21 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

On Status Update Music for GA nomination

Dear @Cathodography, I have extended and so far completed Status Update Music, and as we both have significant effort on this article, I want to ask if you would want to nominate it for GA. If you don't want to, it's alright, I will put it in my GA log, though it would happen later as all my nominations are inactive right now until I have a portable laptop. RTSthestardust (talk) 03:23, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi RTSthestardust! I appreciate you thinking of me first :) I had been considering nominating the article for GA myself when I created it once I had the time, but you managed to expand it further before I got around to doing so. But honestly I wouldn't mind if either you and I nominated it especially since we've both put a considerable amount of work into it. Thanks for expanding it nonetheless! Cattos💭 03:35, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Or actually, we could co-nominate it. It surprisingly changed my mind on nominating for GA in recent time since I feel more good with other articles that feel polished/finished already instead of mostly. - RTSthestardust (talk) 15:18, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'd be happy with that. I'll nominate it once i'm satisfied with the "production and composition" section. Cattos💭 15:33, 26 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
So the "production and composition" section looks unfinished? Could it be because a few tracks weren't explained really? RTSthestardust (talk) 03:02, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm focusing more on the tracks part. Cattos💭 14:41, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup 2026 July newsletter

The third round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 June at 23:59 (UTC). As a reminder, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, while peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 3 will advance to round 4 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 3 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; eight scored over 500; and thirteen scored over 300. The top three contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

  • MCE89 (submissions) with 1567 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography, as well as some article reviews
  • Ohio Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1547 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, featured lists, and a good topic about figure skating, along with 20 article reviews
  • Reconrabbit (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from a high-multiplier featured article on European rabbit and several good articles, DYKs, and reviews
  • A.Cython (submissions) with 1004 points, mainly from good articles about warfare, along with 22 article reviews
  • Generalissima (submissions) with 859 points, mainly from good and featured articles about rivers and East Asian topics

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 12 featured lists, 7 featured-topic articles, 117 good articles, 74 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 13 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 180 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed in Round 4. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 29 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of DJ E is under review

Your good article nomination of the article DJ E is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 06:03, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of DJ E has passed

Your good article nomination of the article DJ E has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 06:22, 4 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

The 2026 Core Contest Winners!

The winners of the 2026 Core Contest are announced 🎉. A huge turnout that resulted in one of our trickiest deliberation sessions. The judges (Aza24, Femke and Casliber) would like to thank everybody who joined and congratulate the winners!

  • First place (and a prize of £120) goes to Vigilantcosmicpenguin (talk · contribs) for his dual efforts on Flatbread and Tortilla! One, formerly an unsourced list-like article, and the other, once a poorly sourced and spotty overview, both now number 250+ citations from an impressively academic source pool. We particularly commend the efforts to globalize content, treat the topics comprehensively and thoughtfully select illustrations. Both articles (one now a GA) are of a uniquely high quality amid the often underserved food topics on Wikipedia. Bravo!
  • Second place (and a prize of £100) goes to Phlsph7 (talk · contribs), a Core Contest regular who has once again shown a mastery of big topics, with his dual efforts on Agnosticism and Premise—both now GAs (one, with a review by our first place winner!). With immensely thorough sourcing improvements, alongside carefully nuanced text on these often misunderstood topics, both articles are a pleasure to read.
  • Third place (and a prize of £80) goes to MCE89 (talk · contribs), whose improvements to the Heard Island and McDonald Islands article have led to a triumphant FA declaration. The incredible balance of detail between human, geographical and flora-fauna elements is a great achievement, and sets a high standard for future island articles.

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.Aza24 (talk) 02:30, 7 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of Los Thuthanaka has passed

Your good article nomination of the article Los Thuthanaka has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of RTSthestardust -- RTSthestardust (talk) 04:25, 9 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of E A Terra Nunca Me Pareceu Tão Distante is under review

Your good article nomination of the article E A Terra Nunca Me Pareceu Tão Distante is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Keechak9999 -- Keechak9999 (talk) 15:23, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of E A Terra Nunca Me Pareceu Tão Distante has failed

Your good article nomination of the article E A Terra Nunca Me Pareceu Tão Distante has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Keechak9999 -- Keechak9999 (talk) 21:42, 24 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of DJ Ramon Sucesso is under review

Your good article nomination of the article DJ Ramon Sucesso is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 01:03, 25 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of DJ Ramon Sucesso is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article DJ Ramon Sucesso has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 22:02, 30 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of E A Terra Nunca Me Pareceu Tão Distante is under review

Your good article nomination of the article E A Terra Nunca Me Pareceu Tão Distante is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 04:43, 4 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

A phonograph for you!

Phonograph
For getting DJ Ramon Sucesso to GA status, take this 1901 Edison home phonograph! Stuff like this promotes Wikilove, and I hope this made you happier. Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 18:39, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of DJ Ramon Sucesso has passed

Your good article nomination of the article DJ Ramon Sucesso has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 18:43, 6 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of E A Terra Nunca Me Pareceu Tão Distante is on hold

Your good article nomination of the article E A Terra Nunca Me Pareceu Tão Distante has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 20:03, 7 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good article nominations RfC

Hi Cathodography,

There is an ongoing Request for Comment (RfC) at Wikipedia:Good article nominations/August 2026 RfC, which you may be interested in because in the past year, you have nominated or reviewed more than one good article nomination. This message has also been sent to all subscribers to the Good Article Gazette. The RfC contains many proposals (33 at the time of writing), which are split into the following categories: nominators, reviewers, reviews, volunteer roles, reviewing initiatives, and others. However, you are more than welcome to add any proposals of your own that you wish to put to the community.

By the end of September, all the proposals will have been closed by an uninvolved editor, either as a consensus for one of the options or with no consensus. At this point, editors will be invited again to develop these proposals into coherent policy and implement them.

Thank you for your contributions to the good articles project, and I look forward to your input! (in solidarity), JacobTheRox(talk|contributions) 16:02, 11 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

A theremin for you!

Theremin
For getting E A Terra Nunca Me Pareceu Tão Distante to GA status (properly this time), take this theremin! Stuff like this promotes Wikilove, and I hope this made you happier! Dragonhawk12 (talk) (Guestbook) (Wikicats) 19:14, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your nomination of E A Terra Nunca Me Pareceu Tão Distante has passed

Your good article nomination of the article E A Terra Nunca Me Pareceu Tão Distante has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Dragonhawk12 -- Dragonhawk12 (talk) 19:23, 16 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.