User talk:UWJSISA414TWA&C

Welcome!

Hi UWJSISA414TWA&C! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 01:20, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tu Duu-Chih moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Tu Duu-Chih. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and more citations to better support the contents. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tu Duu-Chih (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tu Duu-Chih and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, UWJSISA414TWA&C! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:17, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orz Boyz! moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Orz Boyz!. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and more citations to better support the information. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:07, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orz Boyz! (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orz Boyz! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:08, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwan New Cinema (New Taiwanese Cinema) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Taiwan New Cinema (New Taiwanese Cinema). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because too much of the content is unreferenced. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taiwan New Cinema (New Taiwanese Cinema) (June 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Taiwan New Cinema (New Taiwanese Cinema) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Publishing prematurely

Hi, I've today sent three of your articles back to drafts, because none of them were ready to be published. Please don't publish articles that don't comply with the core requirements of verifiability and notability, because they will only be returned to drafts, or else deleted.

In any case, I don't understand why you submit drafts for review at AfC, and then move them into the main article space anyway? Given that you are a very new editor, I would suggest that until such time as you can reliable ascertain whether an article is ready for publishing, you continue to work through the AfC review process. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:45, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments and notes and sorry for the trouble. I was instructed to move the entries into the main article space after I submitted the drafts for review at AfC.

I appreciate you sharing the resources regarding verifiability and notability. I've read both before I began either editing existing entries or creating new drafts. As I thought I've followed the guideline to the best of my knowledge, I was a little confused by the reason that's causing the rejection of these drafts and was wondering if you could help me clarify the requirements.

For context: All the drafts are created based on their existing wikipedia entries in Traditional Chinese. Since almost all of these entries do not have publications already written in English (even when they do, they are mostly film reviews), the majority of the English content is direct translation of the original Chinese entires and so are the references (except for a few that I was able to find English references).

Could you please let me know what would be the best way to move forward with these drafts to ensure that they comply with the requirements of verifiability and notability? You advice is deeply appreciated. Thank you! UWJSISA414TWA&C (talk) 17:50, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:LAU Kek-huat

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:LAU Kek-huat requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://dafilms.com/director/12465-lau-kek-huat. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 20:16, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IMDb links

Hi. I note that you have been adding external links to IMDb, which is fine. However, you don't seem to be aware that there are specific template for doing that, namely {{IMDb title}} and {{IMDb name}}. These are to be preferred to the way you have been doing it, for reasons explained at WT:WikiProject Film/Archive 79#Masking imdb links as wikilinks: saving others like me having to clean up afterwards. Regards. Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:13, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As an aside (and you have been doing nothing wrong) can you tell me exactly where you learned that the use of links like The Fourth Portrait would work? Those of us who tidy up such links and convert them to templates would like to know if there is some Help page or similar that's giving misleading advice when better methods exist. Thanks. Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:36, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you so much for your message and I'm sorry for all the extra work you have done to fix the IMDb hyperlinks I added. This might not be helpful at all, but I wasn't aware of any instructions associated with adding IMDb links. And I have been using visual editing instead of source editing so the IMDb template, unlike other items such as the award chart, wasn't readily apparent while I worked on those entries. The entries I created all existed in Taiwanese Mandarin, so I simply copied the format that was used and copied and pasted the hyperlink that came with it.

I tried to go back to edit the IMDb links on the other entries that I've created and saw that you've fixed all of them. Thank you so much for the edits and for sending me a message so that I can continue to learn in the process. UWJSISA414TWA&C (talk) 15:04, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for your prompt reply. It is very reasonable that you copied something you saw on another-language Wikipedia and didn't think it strange when it worked here as well. That certainly explains why we regularly get editors using that way of linking on the English articles, despite our trying hard to avoid that for the reasons mentioned in the link I supplied above. Each language has its own "rules" and many "rules" are just guidelines, in any case. Can you suggest somewhere you might have looked (on en: Wikipedia) for help to do IMDb links? If so, I'll see if we can add some better advice.... Mike Turnbull (talk) 15:58, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't regularly use VE myself (old dogs and new tricks), but I noticed that via Insert > Template in VE, you can find the "correct" (according to Mike and me) imdb templates. Hope this helps some. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 17:31, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taiwan New Cinema has been accepted

Taiwan New Cinema, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

gobonobo ^{+ c} 20:15, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hi UWJSISA414TWA&C! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 14:09, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tu Duu-Chih has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tu Duu-Chih. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 11:03, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification. I've added the source to Tu Duu-Chih's birth information. UWJSISA414TWA&C (talk) 15:38, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tu Duu-Chih (September 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deb was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tu Duu-Chih and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Deb (talk) 14:44, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Orz Boyz! (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Orz Boyz! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 10:32, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, UWJSISA414TWA&C. Thank you for your work on Chen Yu-hsun. User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:21, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from one or more pages to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example: Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk pages of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, please add attribution retrospectively for that also, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 19:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tu Duu-Chih

Hello, UWJSISA414TWA&C. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tu Duu-Chih, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:06, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:LAU Kek-huat

Hello, UWJSISA414TWA&C. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:LAU Kek-huat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Orz Boyz!

Hello, UWJSISA414TWA&C. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Orz Boyz!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]