User:MortimerCat

My first edit on the 2nd of July 2006 was on Fishbourne Roman Palace, adding the sentence "The last dig in 2002 produced some interesting results, and the final…

User:MortimerCat


My first edit on the 2nd of July 2006 was on Fishbourne Roman Palace, adding the sentence "The last dig in 2002 produced some interesting results, and the final report is eagerly awaited."

COI (I was one of the diggers), POV, weasel and uncited - and it is still there 3 years later!


A summary of my achievements

  • Cleeve Abbey - The first article I created and took to a completed state, now a B-Class.
  • Eastbourne - Driving force in effort to take article to GA status.
  • Sussex and Rutland - adding and completing the infobox to every parish in the county


List of SSSI in East Sussex

I came across this list when it was applying for featured list status - one of the comments was that there were too many red links so forty single line stubs were created.

The article achieved the featured list status and subsequently abandoned along with all the child one line stub articles. As I edited the article in the following weeks I wondered how it had achieved featured article status. There were many incorrect hyperlinks, and misdirected citation links. As for the child articles, I spent lots of time on them, correcting the spelling, adding templates, and improving the infobox so it showed a map.


Why I quit editing

Having to deal with:

  • Editors whose blinkered views result in articles being factually incorrect.
  • Editors who think quoting wiki-policy is a substitute for debate/consensus.
  • Editors who stalk others with whom they had a disagreement.


What am I doing now

Creating my own Wikisite, where I can complete my sub-project, without having to worry about editors jealously guarding their own articles.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.