| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kaliper1. |
| — Wikipedian — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Just as this K-1 cart braves the rugged hills and solemn valleys, so too shall I press onward, threading the silver wires of wisdom through the land, that light and learning may follow in my wake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Account statistics | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joined | 08:25, 10 August 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| First edit | 05:03, 25 June 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Signature | Kaliper¹|t. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Userboxes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kaliper1, also known as K1, is a Wikipedian editor who has been editing articles since 25 June 2020. Kaliper1 began contributing to various Wikimedia sites by initially focusing on making minor improvements such as correcting grammatical errors, adding citations, fixing formatting, adding category and image tags, captions, and links. This hobby served as a pastime after half-retiring from other endeavors. However, due to the upheaval of 2020 and the COVID-19 pandemic, kaliper1 found themselves with an abundance of free time, leading to feelings of boredom and a desire to make a positive impact on the world. As a result, they turned their attention towards contributing to Wikipedia and other related sites, with the aim of making meaningful contributions to the broader online community.
He is an alumnus of the University of Indonesia and the University of Melbourne, and a son of the Moh. Ilyas-Diponegoro princely line.
To many to list them down, You can see my Wikipedia contributions here and Commons uploads, in which some are still in display, are here.
One of the first image/texts edits I've done in Wikipedia was concerning persons of interests in China. Specifically 1920-1940s Manchukuo and Northeast China. I've initially chosen this due to the fact that I was returning back from Beijing. Visiting Museums, Universities (Jilin and Northeast), Old Buildings, and Religious sites in northeast china, that's plastered with history, intrigues me. And during my time there, I've had uploaded photos on Baidu baike (Chinese: 百度百科; pinyin: Bǎidù Bǎikē; lit. 'Baidu Encyclopedia'), A chinese version of Wikipedia per-say. Mainly about unknown and obscure old photos catalogued in museums from the 1920-40's. As of now i've only uploaded Pictures of Feng Yong (Chinese: 馮庸) and Ying Qianli (Chinese: 英千里) from my Baidu baike postings and scouring. So far also i'm planning to add all of my picture postings in Baidu baike site to wikipedia for the world to see. On 2024, I've revisited China, specifically in the Dunhuang area where I traversed the via a local bus. This visit was specifically towards interest within the Silk road, eventually reaching Xi'an. Most of my photos was corrupted due to a damaged SD drive, but thankfully some was managed to get extracted. I'll upload some here at commons.
I have had the opportunity to contribute to the Wikipedia pages related to Timor-Leste, a small country situated between Indonesia and Australia. Specifically, my focus has been on editing and improving the political and geographical sections of these pages. One significant challenge I encountered was the scarcity of information on the English version of the Timor-Leste Wiki in comparison to the more extensive and detailed German Wiki pages. To address this disparity, I decided to translate relevant pages from German to English, which allowed me to make meaningful contributions to the English language wiki community. I noticed that there were far more German language Wikis about Timor-Leste than English, and the Indonesian Wiki was highly underdeveloped. Given that I had some understanding of the German language, albeit a bit rusty and not in use for a long time, I decided to contribute my skills and knowledge to this cause. Thus far, I have been able to make a meaningful contribution by translating and expanding several Wiki pages related to Timor-Leste by also joining WikiProject East Timor.
One out of many examples of the changes I made to these Wiki pages can be seen in the pages for KOTA, PUN, and PST, where I added detailed information on the geography and politics of these regions. I find Timor-Leste to be a fascinating country with a rich cultural history and also personal history! In which, motivated me to contribute to these Wiki pages. I wish to visit Timor-Leste one last time. However, that is a story for another time. In the meantime, I hope others can appreciate the work that I, and many others, have done to improve the quality and depth of information available on Timor-Leste.
My interest in ASEAN (the Association of Southeast Asian Nations) comes from a long and deep fascination with regional cooperation, diplomacy, and the cultural ties that bind Southeast Asia together. I began editing and improving ASEAN-related articles to clarify and expand historical contexts, particularly those involving the founding period in the late 1960s. Much of my work has focused on the ASEAN Declaration (Bangkok Declaration), the formation meetings in Bangkok, and the early diplomatic efforts involving Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand. I was inspired to contribute after studying archival newspapers and documents from the region, including materials from national archives and various foreign ministry publications during my time in university.
My goal is to help make ASEAN articles more comprehensive and accessible, not only for Southeast Asian readers but also for the wider global community. I have a mission to make ASEAN related articles to be comparable to the standards of WikiProject European Union; as much as 1:1. As I, and many parts of the community, see the EU as our main role model; and we should follow their example. Indeed, it is a one-man band. But it is hoped that these efforts will encourage greater understanding of ASEAN’s role in regional stability, economic growth, and cultural exchange in Asia. If the EU can work, so to does ASEAN. And if a sitting Defence Secretary of the U.S. does not know what ASEAN is,[1] then there is much more work to be done.
If you're here from the Pop Kreatif article, I'd recommend listen to this Playlist first to get the idea of what is truly, Indonesia's City Pop. [Give it a try.]


Here are Kaliper1's current drafts. You may see my work being done below. Feel free to contribute!
- 39.9%- 10.1%- 5%- 0%- 1%- 1%Archived/Unused:
- 1%- 0.5%- 11.5%- 15%- 0%Expansions. Articles not made by me, but have the obligation to make it look better than my articles.
- 9%> Reason: Suspect. per WP:LLM.
Joint projects in WP:Indonesia.
To learn how to make an article in Wikipedia for free, try Article Wizard.
Please enable JavaScript to view this component.
Articles
|
|---|
Articles I have significantly contributed to or created
Articles I've started or developed with emerging importance |
Barnstars
| |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Newspaper
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kaliper1 Union process progresses, unanswered questions about Littler Mendelson remainWiki Workers United developmentsFurther to the events described in the previous Signpost issue, Wiki Workers United (WWU) announced on 5 August 2026 that the Wikimedia Foundation leadership had signed a stipulated agreement allowing eligible U.S. Wikimedia staffers to vote for the formation of a WWU branch within the Communications Workers of America (CWA). The WWU statement said:
WWU U.S. also expressed its thanks to the volunteer community for standing beside Wikimedia workers. In the UK, negotiations on the precise scope of the bargaining unit – i.e., which UK workers would be represented through collective bargaining – are still ongoing. The WWU wishes to include managers; the WMF side is arguing that managers and those with access to confidential information should be excluded. Jimmy Wales corrects his earlier statementsJimmy Wales initially pushed back against the notion that the Wikimedia Foundation had hired union-busting lawyers. He subsequently corrected himself, explaining that he had personally been unaware of Littler Mendelson having been hired and considers the decision a mistake.
The following day, however, having spoken with WMF leadership, he said he saw no great problem with the actual work Littler Mendelson had been asked to do:
Unanswered questions remainThe exact timeline and scope of Littler Mendelson's involvement remain elusive to this day. On 6 August Wikimedia Foundation board member Lorenzo Losa was asked:
On 12 August, the same questions were put to Jimmy Wales, who has said he will ask in his next meeting with the WMF whether the Littler hiring date can be released. To date no further information has been made public. On CEO Bernadette Meehan's Meta-Wiki talk page, a call for her to resign, posted by User:Sohom Datta, has attracted around 50 supporters. The WWU solidarity petition became the most supported proposal or petition ever on English-language Wikipedia on 21 August 2026, when the number of signatures surpassed 1375. See also:
–AK Raju Narisetti leaves WMF boardAs announced on Diff on August 11, Raju Narisetti, a Board-selected trustee, stepped off the WMF Board at the end of July after nine years of service. His tenure had been due to end on January 1, 2027 (after a term extension granted by the Board in August 2025; the Foundation's bylaws stipulate that trustees "may serve a maximum of three consecutive full terms (that is, nine years)."). Raju served nine years on the Board's Audit Committee. At different points he chaired the Talent & Culture committee and also (from 2025) the Governance committee responsible for the Board selection process. In that capacity, he oversaw the controversial changes to the process for electing trustees by community vote, implemented shortly before last year's board elections, and recommended the removal of two shortlisted community members as candidates (Signpost coverage). As reported in last issue's "News and notes", the governance committee just recently (on 17 July) presented its revised eligibility criteria for board candidates that the board had pledged to review after last year's community pushback. Following further community discussions, on July 31, trustee Maciej Nadzikiewicz (appointed as new chair of the Governance Committee earlier that month) posted an update acknowledging that "We realize that our proposal needs more work". Raju's departure leaves the Board at 10 members. The Wikimedia Foundation has announced "Our 2026 Trustee search", inviting nominations or submissions for new appointed Board members. While not specifying hard eligibility criteria, it lists various "Essential Experience and Values" and "Priority Skills, Knowledge or Expertise". Raju left a good-bye message on LinkedIn (archive.org copy), looking back at his time on the Wikimedia Foundation Board:
The Signpost wishes Raju well in his future endeavours. Brief notes
Kaliper1 Wikipedia editors save Sam Altman's lifeCunningham's LawSeveral publications highlighted how a briefly visible vandalism edit to Open AI CEO Sam Altman's Wikipedia article led Google Search to show that he was dead.[2] The edit falsely claimed that Altman had been assassinated, with the edit reverted 42 minutes later. Google's search overview picked up on this addition and "informed" users that he died on August 12. Shortly after the error was initially reverted, several temporary accounts briefly readded it before being reverted, and the page has now been temporarily semi protected. The Signpost thanks everyone who works hard to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. Maybe next week these publications will take the opportunity to write about all the correct information on Wikipedia. Let this also serve as a reminder of all the people who rely on our efforts for their information beyond just our direct readers. – M, C Jimbo continues the tourOn August 16, 2026, Fortune magazine published an interview with Jimmy Wales. It began with asking how Wikipedia supports itself without ads. (Meanwhile, editors are discussing removing the donation banners from Wikipedia until the issues with meta:Wiki Workers United are resolved.) Jimbo also highlighted that regular donors are subsidizing the AI companies which use Wikipedia for their training data and discussed known issues with AI in editing. There was also a dose of book promotion. – C In brief
Do you want to contribute to "In the media" by writing a story or even just an "in brief" item? Edit our next edition in the Newsroom or leave a tip on the suggestions page.
References
Kaliper1 Women in blue? Wikipedia's gender gap reverses in some areas
A monthly overview of recent academic research about Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, also published as the Wikimedia Research Newsletter.
Women in blue? "[T]he trend reversed in 2022" and female biology professors are now more likely to have a Wikipedia biography than male ones
Times may be changing on our project. A recent publication in the Proceedings of the Royal Society highlights how representation of female tenure-track biologists has surpassed that of their male counterparts.[1]
As we have noted here at various times before (not just regarding gender biases, but also e.g. regarding political biases), gaps in coverage are not necessarily due to biases on behalf of Wikipedia itself (in the sense of editors "putting the thumb on the scale"). In this case though, while trying to understand "the causes of this reversal", the authors plausibly point to changes on Wikipedia itself, namely the activities of the WikiProject Women in Red, which began counteracting the article gap in 2015, and related efforts:
The researchers also obtained various other variables as part of their census of professors, and analyzed their relation to the likelihood of having a Wikipedia biography:
A few further statistical analyses controlling for these academic metrics indicated that
In Germany, "female professors seem to have a higher chance of having a Wikipedia biography than their male counterparts"
Another recent study[2] focused on the coverage of German scholars on the German Wikipedia and similarly found that
This effect was determined to be concentrated in STEM disciplines:
Similar to the above study of US biology professors on enwiki, the authors started with a systematic census of their target population, and also examined the (not necessarily causal) effects of other scholarly metrics on the likelihood of being covered on Wikipedia:
Unlike the above US-focused Proceedings of the Royal Society paper, the authors here did not attempt to track changes in the German Wikipedia's coverage over time, or to assess the potential impact of editing campaigns that target gender gaps. Those are only mentioned in passing in a section titled: "What can scientists do to get a Wikipedia biography?":
Other recent publicationsOther recent publications that could not be covered in time for this issue include the items listed below. Contributions, whether reviewing or summarizing newly published research, are always welcome.
"Quantifying (Mis)alignment Between Reader Focus and Editor Citation in Scholarly Biomedical Topics in Wikipedia"From the abstract:[3]
See also our coverage of earlier research that similarly found a "Misalignment Between Supply and Demand" of Wikipedia's content "The most influential philosophers in Wikipedia: a multicultural analysis"From the abstract:[4]
See also our earlier coverage of related research: "Wikipedia-based graphs visualize influences between thinkers, writers and musicians" "Filling in the Blanks? A Systematic Review and Theoretical Conceptualisation for Measuring WikiData Content Gaps"From the abstract:[5]
References
Kaliper1 Again and AgainDon't make me say it againThere is an ongoing request for comment regarding the administration of administrator elections. While a few questions are still open, many others have already been closed by Giraffer. Previous administrator elections have had monitors who could remove personal attacks. However, in the previous election, monitors removed questions for being inappropriate rather than strictly personal attacks. There is now "consensus that blatantly inappropriate questions may be curated" by a monitor after they are posed to a candidate. Support for the status quo was maintained for all other issues raised in this discussion. Confirmed and Re-confirmedOn August 4, discussion on whether to change the requirements for users to obtain the WP:AUTOCONFIRM and WP:EXTENDED confirmed status was closed by Mz7. The discussion involved 163 comments from 74 people. Consensus was for no change except that counters should start from a user's first edit rather than when their account is created. The closer noted a general lack of evidence to support any change to status quo. Is Bernadette Salty?Sohom Datta is currently one of our interface administrators, author of SodiumBot, a member of the Product and Technology Advisory Council, Toolforge standards committee, and the Unsupported Tools Working Group. On August 2, 2026 he wrote this request for WMF CEO Bernadette Meehan to resign. The conflict stems from the board's handling of an attempt by some WMF staff to unionize. More than 200 people have participated in the subsequent discussion with many voices supporting Datta's request. Meehan, Jimbo, and Lorenzo Losa have stated that they want to listen to the community and all the staff, cooperate, and follow all applicable law. Communication Workers of America plans to participate in a National Labor Relations Board facilitated election for which the results will be determined on September 3. Trout for AIThe speedy deletion criteria was amended to delete "Unambiguously LLM-generated pages". Levivich closed the discussion while noting some ambiguity in the consensus on how code contributions like Lua, Javascript, and templates will be treated. This amendment introduced additional technical indicators for what constitutes unambiguous LLM output. Improvement to the main pageA village pump RFC was closed by Barkeep49, with consensus to restructure This week's article for improvement and add it to the Main Page. With 89 participants, this is a relatively local consensus in comparison to the overall visibility of the page. While consensus was reached for the overall proposal, certain aspects of how to implement this did not get a clear consensus. TAFI briefly made an appearance on the main page on May 10, 2013, but was quickly pulled. Kaliper1 Look out, here comes the Spider-Man!
Wealth and fame he's ignored, action is his reward (July 26 to August 1)
Spins a web any size, catches thieves just like flies (August 2 to 8)
Spider blood, spider blood, radioactive spider blood (August 9 to 15)
Exclusions
Most edited articlesFor the July 17 – August 17 period, per this database report.
Kaliper1 Her tastes, her Wikimania, her upcoming tour... Baby Globe reveals everything
Your arrival at Wikimania 2026 was unexpected; did you have a good trip?
How many Wikimedians did you pose with?
The Wikimedia France Core Team worked hard on accessibility for this event; what did you think of it? Is there anything that could be improved?
What was your favorite snack or treat from the coffee break buffets?
Are you more of a coffee, tea, or hot chocolate person? Croissant, pain au chocolat, or chocolatine?
Did you get a chance to taste the cheeses?
Why did you take so long to come over for the group photo? We waited several minutes in the scorching sun!
By the way, what are the next stops on your tour? Are you already preparing to promote your new album? (As a reminder, Taylor Swift played 149 concerts for over 10 million fans during her 2023–2024 tour.)
Is it a good position to be in—Baby Globe at Wikimania?
What’s your take on Wiki Workers United (WWU)? You appear in some of their visuals.
Can you explain your connection to the Wikimedia Cuteness Association?
What is your favorite beret color?
Can we expect to meet other mascots for the various Wikimedia projects in the future?
Notes
Kaliper1 The great outdoorsWeek of 2 August 2026: Ano ang nagpapasaya sa iyo sa linggong ito?
Seafair 2026 happened in Seattle during the first week of August. Performances from the United States Navy's Blue Angels aerobatics squadron are a regular annual feature. The Blue Angels are scheduled to return in 2027, but environmental concerns may result in changes eventually. One proposal that I heard was to change to demonstrations of electric-powered aircraft. There are many other elements of Seafair, such as Coast Guard Search and Rescue demonstrations, visits of ships from multiple nations, and hydroplane racing. The Blue Angels routinely attract thousands of spectators. Week of 9 August 2026: ʔəshiiɬ čəd.
The International Day of the World's Indigenous Peoples takes place annually on 9 August. The Klamath River runs through parts of the states of Oregon and California in the United States. The indigenous peoples in this area have had a relationship with the river for centuries. However, the river was dammed starting in approximately the year 1918. Recently several dams were removed, and a group of indigenous teenagers kayaked the entire un-dammed portion of the river. Their journey was documented in an excellent 30-minute Oregon Public Broadcasting production, First Descent: Kayaking the Klamath River, which I encourage people to watch. The video includes a few ugly images of environmental damage on the river, so people may not want to watch First Descent during a meal, but overall I think viewers will like it. I appreciated the hopeful outlook. Week of 23 August 2026: Cosa ti rende felice questa settimana?
The Perseids are a prolific meteor shower associated with the comet Swift–Tuttle. They are usually visible from mid-July to late August. The meteors are called the Perseids because they appear from the general direction of the constellation Perseus and in more modern times have a radiant bordering on Cassiopeia and Camelopardalis. In 1866, after the perihelion passage of Swift–Tuttle in 1862, the Italian astronomer Giovanni Virginio Schiaparelli discovered the link between meteor showers and comets. The finding is contained in an exchange of letters with Angelo Secchi. Regarding translationsSkillful translations of the sentence "What's making you happy this week?" would be very much appreciated. If you see any inaccuracies in the translations in this article, then please {{ping}} User:Pine or User:Clovermoss in the discussion section of this page, or boldly make the correction to the text of the article. Thank you to everyone who has helped with translations so far. Your turnWhat makes you happy or grateful this month? You are welcome to write a comment on the talk page of this Signpost piece. Kaliper1 Are we embarrassed yet?BackgroundThe Signpost and others have previously reported on the Trump administration's attempts to hurt the Wikipedia project.[a] In particular, Ed Martin, of the Department of Justice Weaponization Working Group, has vowed to shame Wikipedia or worse.[1] A year has passed since he instigated his shame campaign, but what has he actually done to bring shame on the biggest project for free information in human history? Freedom of InformationUnfortunately, The Signpost does not have the answer for you right now, but this draft Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request may soon illuminate matters. The author (User:Czarking0) plans to personally submit the request via MuckRock after hearing feedback from the community. Names and addresses have been redacted. DraftFOIA Request — DOJ Office of Information Policy Weaponization Working Group / Wikimedia Foundation Dear FOIA Officer: I hereby request access to and copies of the records described below. I. BACKGROUND On April 24, 2025, then-Acting United States Attorney for the District of Columbia Edward R. Martin Jr. sent a letter to then Wikimedia Foundation CEO Maryana Iskander, which alleged that Wikipedia "allows foreign actors to manipulate information and spread propaganda" and requested documents concerning the Foundation's compliance with Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. This request was submitted on DOJ letterhead and under the auspices of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia. On February 5, 2025, Attorney General Pam Bondi established the Weaponization Working Group ("WWG") within the Office of the Attorney General, pursuant to her memorandum titled "Restoring the Integrity and Credibility of the Department of Justice." The WWG is tasked with reviewing the activities of all departments and agencies and has drawn upon resources across the Department, including the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia and other personnel. Mr. Martin subsequently became the director of the Weaponization Working Group. This request seeks to determine whether the WWG has independently taken up, reviewed, referred, continued, or expanded any inquiry, investigation, or action concerning the Wikimedia Foundation or Wikipedia. The Signpost has previously published investigative reporting on the Martin letter, the House Oversight Committee inquiry of August 2025, and the Senate Commerce Committee inquiry of October 2025. This request is made in direct furtherance of that ongoing coverage.
II. RECORDS REQUESTED I request all records created, received, transmitted, or maintained from October 1, 2025 to December 1, 2025 held by the Weaponization Working Group which include any communications between Mr. Martin and other WWG staff discussing:
III. FORMAT OF REQUESTED RECORDS Please provide responsive records in electronic format (PDF or native format) where available. IV. FEE Category I request a full fee waiver on these grounds: Disclosure of whether and how the DOJ's Weaponization Working Group has exercised (or declined to exercise) investigative authority over the Wikimedia Foundation contributes significantly to public understanding of government operations. The WWG is a novel executive entity whose activities have been almost entirely opaque since its creation. Records showing how and if its leaders have targeted a major nonprofit directly illuminate how federal power is being exercised toward civil society organizations. The April 2025 letter from then-Acting U.S. Attorney Martin that explicitly threatened the Foundation's tax-exempt status and promised to use the office to "embarrass" the Foundation regardless of legal findings is of special public interest. This request is made solely for journalistic purposes. Neither I nor The Signpost has any commercial interest in the Wikimedia Foundation, any financial relationship with any party involved in the matters described, or any interest in the outcome of any investigation beyond accurate public reporting. In the alternative, if a fee waiver is not granted, I request that this be processed under the news media requester fee category. I have previously been credited as an author in The Signpost, a newspaper that has covered Wikipedia, the Wikimedia Foundation, and the broader free knowledge movement continuously since December 2005. The Signpost satisfies each element of the regulatory definition of a news organization. The Signpost actively gathers, investigates, and reports on matters of public concern relating to one of the world's most widely used reference sources. This request is made in connection with active investigative reporting on the exercise of federal government authority over the Wikimedia Foundation and its volunteer editor community which is a subject of documented public interest that The Signpost has previously reported on at length. The Signpost volunteers publish original journalism. Records obtained through this request will be analyzed, contextualized, and incorporated into original reporting. They will be submitted to The Signpost for editorial review. The Signpost is published on the Wikipedia platform and is freely accessible to the public worldwide. It is among the most widely read publications directly focused on the Wikipedia community, with a documented readership and a public archive of reporting spanning two decades. The Signpost has published a draft of this request which has drawn support from the readership and the publication plans to publish additional articles on the topic herein. The Signpost operates with full editorial independence from the Wikimedia Foundation. It is not paid, directed, or editorially supervised by the Wikimedia Foundation or any affiliated entity. Its coverage regularly includes critical reporting on the Wikimedia Foundation, its leadership, and its institutional relationships — including the congressional inquiries that are the subject of this request. Courts and FOIA reviewing bodies have consistently held that news media status does not require large circulation, mainstream institutional affiliation, or commercial operation. The Signpost's two-decade publication history, independent editorial structure, and demonstrated record of original investigative journalism place it squarely within this category. V. EXPEDITED PROCESSING REQUEST I also request expedited processing on the grounds that there is a compelling need for the records. The subject matter is of current public and journalistic significance. There is a risk that delayed disclosure could affect ongoing public discourse, editorial decision-making at Wikipedia, and chilling effects on the anonymous contributions of Wikipedia editors. I certify that my need for expedited processing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Please send all correspondence and responsive records to REDACTED If you have questions about the scope of this request or require clarification before proceeding, please contact me at the above information before making any adverse determination. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Footnotes
Sources
Kaliper1 Paris Syndrome: Labor Strife, AI Anxiety, and a Leadership Test at Wikimania 2026
The first thing to know about Wikimania this year is that it convened in the middle of the worst standoff between the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) and its own employees in years. In the weeks before, one WMF staffer suggested to The Wikipedian that things could get “spicy.” It was a good prediction. The second thing to know about Wikimania this year is that it involved more security theater than any previous Wikimania. After a scary incident at last year’s WikiConference North America—where a disturbed man brought a gun to the event and threatened to commit self-harm, only to be disarmed by plucky Wikipedians—tickets were limited and the venue was withheld until the last possible moment. And if there is yet one more thing to know, it almost goes without saying, of course the inescapable topic was the promise and peril of generative AI, as it has been at every wikiconference The Wikipedian has attended for the past three and a half years. Each year the models get more powerful, each year the threats and opportunities expand, and each year people get more anxious and excited. Fringe BenefitsThis year, events on the periphery of Wikimania proper included an all-day pre-conference AI workshop and a friendly counter-conference, Wiki Fringe, inspired in part by the famous Edinburgh Fringe vis-à-vis the original, concurrently held in a maker space just across the canal from the science museum. At the AI pre-conference day, a third to half of the room identified themselves as having “vibe-coded.” Speakers explained agentic harnesses and shared skill repositories; among the more interesting talks was one by a native Telugu speaker on how it costs more tokens to use AI in languages that don’t use Romanized characters. A group discussion inviting views on proper AI usage in the Wikimedia world quickly revealed a broad consensus: use it for the things we trust generative AI to do, and don’t use it for the things we don’t. Which is not to say everyone was eager to spend more time than necessary on the subject. One developer at the main conference told The Wikipedian he was intentionally avoiding the AI sessions entirely. But the Fringe was a blast, despite the poor AC, and it doubled as the designated after-hours party spot several nights running. The crowd included former Wikimedia staffers, the WikiPortraits crew, a representative from an open-source, open-weight, open-everything LLM project, and a Brooklyn artist with a receipt printer, printing Wikipedia articles on receipt paper. People sometimes ask me how Wikipedia editors view generative AI, and the truest answer I have is: we’ve got both kinds. Wikipedia editors have long been early adopters by temperament, but now Wikipedia is the incumbent, as ripe for disruption as any dot-com-era mastodon. In fact, the contradiction is best embodied by the single most influential contributor to Wikipedia’s AI response: Chaotic Enby, a twentysomething French AI PhD candidate who founded WikiProject AI Cleanup, dedicated to saving the human-curated encyclopedia from AI slop; who also founded WikiProject AI Tools, encouraging AI’s responsible use to help editors do their jobs better; and also—pause for breath—authored parts of the prohibition on LLM-generated text that passed English Wikipedia with overwhelming support in March 2026. Liberté, Égalité, SolidaritéWeeks before Wikimania, the Wikimedia Foundation made the shock decisions first to abruptly fire Brooke Vibber—the lead developer of MediaWiki for more than 20 years, and the WMF’s first employee—and then to disband the entire Community Tech team: six people whose jobs were building tools requested by the community, with the unstated but widely understood subtext that union organizing was at the core of it. By the time everyone landed in Paris, Wiki Workers United’s U.S. branch had formally demanded voluntary recognition, with the support of the Communications Workers of America, and set a deadline of July 24, right in the middle of the conference. More than 1,000 Wikimedians had signed a solidarity petition, and some were openly weighing an editorial strike. The executives arriving in Paris, including newly installed CEO Bernadette Meehan, were—contrary to the famous Wikipedia essay—very much on deadline. The conference hit peak Scoville during a panel billed as a “Fireside Chat with the Wikimedia Foundation Executives”—see for yourself on YouTube—the first real opportunity for union supporters to ask for recognition in a public setting. With Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales seated in the front row, the panel opened with community-elected board trustee Bobby Shabangu asking Meehan a series of friendly questions. On the first six months of her tenure, she ultimately settled on: “It’s the start of a journey is how it has been.” Fine, but the room had questions. Instead, Shabangu threw to chief product and technology officer Selena Deckelmann to address the important matters raised by—no, it was to demo a new mobile editing tool. Meehan, to her partial credit, read the room well enough to hastily add that question time was coming. Meanwhile, for some reason, Deckelmann chose a French Wikipedia page to showcase the tool, despite admitting “I don’t actually speak or read French—I’m not going to submit these changes at the end.” After rushing through it, and apologizing for the rushing, she finished. And then… asked if she could do a second demonstration. At which point a former officer of Wikimedia France drew applause for saying, respectfully, this was not the time for a tech demo. Finally, the Q&A. Even with a full battery of WMF executives onstage, every question went to Meehan, the first three all asking basically the same thing: “Are you going to honor the movement’s values and do the right thing and recognize the union today?” Meehan responded by deploying a skill for which she was almost certainly hired: saying a great many words without saying anything one could latch onto. And yet, she was not entirely successful in this. One early explanation for not addressing the union’s demands at Wikimania—“our focus is on executing and helping the core organizing team execute a great event”—fell flat, as everyone in the room knew Wikimanias are organized by the local chapter. The follow-up question: “Why not today?” And while she insisted, more than once, “If the decision is to have a union, we’ll have a union,” she also made the unfortunate error of playing the my-job-is-hard card, saying of those who would ask her to move faster, allegedly at the expense of proper protocol: “I don’t have that luxury as the CEO of an organization with 700 employees in 44 different countries.” Later, responding to another question, she said, “I’m not going to litigate it in this room,” causing enough of a stir that an organizer stepped in to suggest it was time for another topic. Yes We Can’tOn July 27, one day after Wikimania 2026 ended, the WMF announced it would not voluntarily recognize the union, despite visible support from staff and community, not to mention a growing sense of inevitability. Instead the WMF is exercising its right to a secret-ballot election overseen by the National Labor Relations Board (NRLB). WWU and its backers at CWA agreed to participate, but opined in their response that the WMF was taking the “low road.” It was lost on no one that the NLRB—never a priority of any Republican administration—has taken an even harder anti-union turn in Trump’s second term. And worse, word trickled out that the WMF had retained the services of Littler Mendelson, a U.S. corporate law firm best known for leading anti-union campaigns at Starbucks, Apple, and Amazon. In the week since, Jimmy Wales has clearly spent a lot of time on his talk page, gamely if not entirely successfully defending the decisions of the executives he helped put in place. He’s always Jimmy—slightly aloof but good-intentioned, if vague and imprecise, and not even expected to be effectual—trying to reassure everyone that everything will turn out all right, just trust him, after all, he wrote the book on it. The community was not persuaded. A recent Wikimedian of the Year went after him hard, and another editor scoffed at the notion that the union had asked the WMF to skip due diligence. At one point Wales was categorical and emphatic: “There are no ‘union-avoidance law firms’ involved here,” adding that if the WMF engaged in any union busting, “I’d be the first one on the picket lines.” GorillaWarfare, who spent years on ArbCom, wrote that this is “a fight that I do not believe the WMF will win.” In the meantime, an anonymous ex-WMF data scientist had launched a blog called Wikifired, alleging managerial incompetence and ass-covering, and revealing the paltry sum offered (and declined) for their silence: $26,845.52. Ultimately, Jimmy’s reputation will survive this episode; insulation is one thing a board of trustees and well-paid executive staff can buy, not to mention being the continuously involved founder of a movement still going quite strong actually, despite it all, in its third decade. But it’s hard to look at the start of Meehan’s tenure and not wonder how long she’ll be part of it. Bernadette Peters OutA running joke has started to coalesce, that Meehan will find a way to mention her time working for President Obama, as she awkwardly did in her keynote speech at the start of the conference. Whatever her point was, it didn’t land. And it self-consciously invokes the neoliberal era Obama defined, which hasn’t been our reality for some time. And now here is a veteran of several Democratic administrations playing the role of the union-busting corporate manager. The question of whether a political operative is what the WMF needs is worth asking on its own. The thinking, one assumes, is: here is a savvy player, a political veteran, a survivor. But that experience is entirely on one side of the aisle, and Donald Trump may not hate Democrats quite as much as he hates RINO Republicans, but he hates them all the same. Which is not to say the board should have appointed John Yoo—can you imagine—but a wiser course might have been to look outside the realm of politics entirely. It’s also hard not to think about the lineage. Katherine Maher—now CEO of NPR, dissuading no one of the notion that Wikipedia is more liberal than it lets on—looks like she might go down as the last Wikimedia leader who seemed to genuinely care about the project. Maher came from the same NGO world as her successors, but she had also been promoted up from communications director, and maintained a collegiality within the movement more like that of Wales, and the first WMF chief, Sue Gardner, than of any other WMF chief before or since. When Meehan leaves, what do you suppose are the chances she goes to work at another movement-aligned organization? Following the uneventful leadership of Maryana Iskander, and the initially quiet appointment of Meehan, it seems obvious to many in the movement that no future CEO will ever come from the community, nor even from longtime staff. From here on, the WMF will continue to be led by ambassadors, chancellors, and holders of various other honorifics. So much of what the job really involves is managing large budgets, external stakeholders, and international systems. The Wikimedia Foundation is an NGO, and one that does so many things it’s not clear, even to the community it supposedly exists to support, what it actually does. The Wikipedian has long argued that the Wikimedia Foundation is too big for its own good—no longer able, if it ever really was, to channel the movement’s vision or support its many mechanisms. Wikipedia would be better served by a WMF reimagined as a largely grant-making body, with a handful of modestly-sized organizations each responsible for a critical piece of Wikimedia infrastructure. It would be easier to understand what they’re doing, easier to hold to account, and most of all, truer to the distributed movement that Wikimedia has always been. Instead, WMF tries to be everything to everyone, with the expected results. Which brings me to the last time I saw Bernadette Meehan in Paris. It was at the AI Fringe space on Thursday afternoon, where a dozen or so Wikimedians were holding their own small closing ceremony. She appeared in the back, largely unnoticed, and said to the two or three Wikimedians who actually noticed her: “I was on my walk back, and I thought, that looks like wiki people.” I said, yes, we are, then looked away for a moment, then back—and she was gone. A friendly gesture, no doubt, but one carrying no weight. In the end, this might be how the Bernadette Meehan era goes: claiming to mean well; misaligned from the start; and perhaps departing before anything could be asked of her. Kaliper1 WP:FAOWNIf articles have been updated, you may need to .
|
You might have seen the infobox. Yes, you read it right. I am a direct descendant of Prince Diponegoro. My branch traces through the Sokaraja line of the Naqshbandiyah Khalidiyah Mujaddadiyah: from KH Ali Dipowongso in Makkah to KH Moh Ilyas in Sokaraja, then through the successive caretakers of that pesantren tradition. The line is named as the Moh. Ilyas great family line. The chain begins with Kanjeng Sultan Hamengkubuwono III of the Keraton Ngayogyakarta Hadiningrat, followed by his son and heir in struggle, Bendara Pangeran Harya (BPA) Prince Diponegoro, the National Hero.

Prince Diponegoro first married at the age of 27. He wed Ayu Retno Madubrongto, a religious teacher and the second daughter of Kiai Gede Dadapan. From this union, he was blessed with a son, Putra Diponegoro II.[1] From him the line continues on from Kanjeng Pangeran Adipati (KPA) Diponegoro II of Diponingrat, then to Kyai Haji Ali Dipowongso, who was active and studied deeply in Mekkah,[2][3][4] and then to Kyai Haji Raden Mas Mohammad Ilyas bin Ali Dipowongso, the founder of the Tarekat Naqsyabandiyah Mujaddadiyah in Sokaraja.[5][6][4] After him, the mantle passed to Kyai Haji Raden Affandi bin Ilyas, the second mursyid, who passed away on 05 January 1916, followed by Kyai Haji Raden Rifai bin Affandi, the third mursyid, who passed away on 4 August 1968 (10 Jumadil Awal 1388 H), and then to Kyai Haji Raden Abdulsalam bin Rifai, the fourth mursyid, who passed away on 12 May 2014 (12 Rajab 1388 H).[7] The leadership then continued with Kyai Haji Raden Ir. Torik Arie Ghuzdiwan,[8][9] who was appointed as the sixth mursyid in May 2014. Kyai Haji Raden Abdulsalam bin Rifai had a younger sister, who is my grandmother. She marrilied a wonderful gentleman who is a veteran of the Indonesian National Revolution and was also partly Indos decent. The lineage of this line (trah) can be attested by a Layang Kakancingan (royal decree[10]) numbered 11553, issued on 18 September 1960 by a Yogyakarta palace official (Pangarsa) and a Serat Kekancingan (documents to residents or institutions for the use of Sultanaat Grond[11][12]) from the Yogyakarta palace library archive.[13]
Though my ancestor historically comes part of the Naqshbandiyah-Khalidiyya sufi order which follows the Tareqat of Abu Bakr,[14][15] (specifically the Soekaraja Lor Order).[4] I come from a Nahdlatul Ulama family under the Ash'ari School, though I practice Islam fairly secularly and liberally as schooled following Azharite thought under the adoption of the pluralistic and moderatic Islam Nusantara form. This does not not shape my view, I just like that piece of history. I follow WP:NPOV strictly.
| Ancestors of Kaliper1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: periodical has ISBN (link)
{{cite thesis}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
Commons Page. Useful Pages: Cheatsheet
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.