Reason: Same as below, no need for quotes. Yes it's from a page move but there are no incoming links from articles.
Playing These Games Before: {{db-reason}}; additional information: {Custom rationale: Redirect to an article at CSD for G2. Once the page is deleted, G8 can be used, until then the most appropriate is R3.}; notified Schizzyzozozo (talk·contribs) 19:26, 23 February 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Draftified for being unsourced before being moved back to namespace by the original creator without any modifications being made. I could find no sources of any kind regarding anything that happened in Ahlat in 1895; the defense of Ahlat by Aghbiur Serob appears not to exist. The text also has some pro-Armenian neutrality issues. Any salvageable content (of which there appears to be none) can easily be covered in the Hamidian massacres article. 🐔ChicdatBawk to me! 17:13, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Extremely unlikely and unnatural search term. Was an article for less than an hour in 2014, the subject of the article is not mentioned at the target. 🐔ChicdatBawk to me! 18:40, 6 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: No need for additional disambiguation (Hamas-led, Israel) in the title, it just makes it longer without adding enough benefit. Going off Google hits, "October 7 attacks" is five times more common than "October 7 Hamas attack" and almost 50 times more common than the full title. "October 7 attack" is even more common, but as there was clearly more than one attack, so the plural form is the correct title. As it has been established that this is the primary topic for October 7 attacks, this is a pretty routine request, but as there have been prior RMs, this is here and not at RMTR. 🐔ChicdatBawk to me! 20:52, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Certainly some clashes continue in Lebanon, but few to no sources characterize the invasion as ongoing. The minor occupation of Lebanese border areas can be mentioned in the main Israel–Hezbollah conflict article, which can be repurposed as continuing to the present. Thank you. 🐔ChicdatBawk to me! 20:37, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Clearly no primary topic. Field goal (basketball) consistently beats this page in views – in fact, a case could be made that that's the primary. (As a side note, why is the basketball move called that? There's no field...) 🐔ChicdatBawk to me! 21:46, 16 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Per WP:INCDAB. >6:1 pageview ratio between this and 1982 (2019 film). Oppose votes should reflect opposition to this move request, not opposition to the INCDAB guideline or support for the PFILM local consensus, as is seen all too often on these move requests. 🐔ChicdatBawk to me! 17:35, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Clear common name, per Google hits. Also per consistency with Israeli Jews – not Jewish citizens of Israel. The claim that they mostly identify as "Palestinian citizens of Israel" appears to not really be the case. The current title seems to be primarily used by the Israeli government in an attempt to ostracize its Arab minority. The article itself uses the names interchangeably. 🐔ChicdatBawk to me! 11:08, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Sources almost universally describe the current conflict as a war. The word "invasion" is used only in reference to Russia's initial 24 February act of invasion, and is not used to describe the current war, three years long. [1][2][3][4] are all from just today; all describe the current conflict as a war. To those sources that call it a three-year-long invasion, we must consider Wikipedia's influence on the matter, which artificially inflates the percentage of sources using such framework. This article calls the conflict a war consistently (e.g. The direct cost of the war for Russia has been over US$450 billion.) This distinction between an invasion and a war has historical precedent. German invasion of the Soviet Union redirects to Operation Barbarossa, not to Eastern Front (World War II), even though Germany was still advancing for almost a year after the German invasion of Russia occurred. The main obstacle in moving this article to a page with "war" in it is the existence of the article Russo-Ukrainian War. However, it is hardly community consensus that keeps the page at that title. The article remained at the title Russian military intervention in Ukraine (2014–present) for six years before an RM, opened by a blocked sock and with low participation, found consensus to move in June 2020. Immediately after it was closed, a large number of editors voiced salient concerns about the new title that, had they commented in the discussion, would have resulted in the page not being moved. These include I suppose this (and even previous) title is wrong. If to refer to Google search, then Russo-Ukrainian conflict has 100x more hits than both. from Infovarius, followed by agreement below from other editors. Sources almost universally refer to the state of affairs since 2014 as a conflict – even many that describe a three-year invasion. The archives of Talk:Russo-Ukrainian War are full of editors complaining about how the title is wrong, and though the ECR means they have no voice on this topic, the complaint should be heard. We have spent three years ignoring sources and misleading readers. Let's get back on track with our policies. On "Russo-Ukrainian" vs. "Russia–Ukraine", the former is consistent with names entrenched in historical literature (e.g. Franco-Prussian War) while the second is consistent with contemporary names for conflicts (e.g. Iran–Israel war). The absolute common name is "Ukraine war" or "war in Ukraine", but both are ambiguous, and per WP:NATDIS, this still-common name (used in the Al Jazeera header among other news outlets) should prevail, outnumbering "Russo-Ukrainian war" by upwards of an order of magnitude. On "War" vs. "war", the word is not consistently capitalized in sources, per NCCAPS. It is not usually capitalized in sources, per MILTERMS. It is, in fact, very rarely capitalized in sources, as it doesn't yet represent a proper name, but a descriptive name for the conflict. TL;DR: Let's do what Wikipedia does best and choose the common name for these two articles. --
Reason: Clear common name and consistency with Western Front, Eastern Front, and Italian front. Bulgarian Army formation is definitely not the primary topic here.
Reason: Usually capitalized in sources per MOS:CAPS; also per WP:GEOCAPS as it belongs to a class of objects (peninsulas) that are treated as proper names. This would revert an undiscussed move by an editor who is now banned from capitalization.
Reason: This is the primary topic for all Gaza humanitarian crises, as demonstrated by the main title, Gaza humanitarian crisis, redirecting here. This is similar to the Gaza war and Gaza Strip famine where the 2023–present event is the primary topic.
Reason: Redirect or Merge to List of Brazilian supercentenarians. The article contains no more than ROUTINE coverage that you would expect to see for someone unusually accomplished at breathing. There is enough sourcing for a mini-bio there per WP:NOPAGE.
Reason: Redirect from a page move, but from an implausible misspelling ("povery" for "poverty") and with no incoming links. With no pageviews in the past month and a half, no one is looking for this page.
Reason: WP:NOPAGE. There are lots of sources that mention uncontested shots, but none that give SIGCOV. (The one source cited only mentions "uncontested shot" in reference to free throws, which is not what this article is talking about.) This page will never be more than a dictionary definition, so best to merge it to Glossary of basketball terms where it belongs.
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.