Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
heading and {{Moved from|[[WP:CFDS]]|~~~~}}. If the nominator wants to revive the process, this may be requested at CfD in accordance with its instructions...
Click to read more »window by selecting Plugins → Recategorise per CFD main menu item. Open a section of WP:CFD/W or WP:CFD/WL for editing and paste its contents into the...
Click to read more »Alternatively, tag the category pages and relist the discussion on the current day's CfD log. Determine whether consensus to delete or rename has been reached. See:...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:CFD/WWP:CFD/W WP:CFDWWP:CFDW If process guidelines are met, move categories to the appropriate section here to prepare to delete. Before...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:CFD/ACWP:CFD/AC WP:CFD/DACWP:CFD/DAC WP:CFDACWP:CFDAC List of post-closure work to be done: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working List...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:CFD/W/MWP:CFD/W/M WP:CFDWMWP:CFDWM These are nominations that need attention and work by editors before the CfD request can be completed...
Click to read more »heading and {{Moved from|[[WP:CFDS]]|~~~~}}. If the nominator wants to revive the process, this may be requested at CfD in accordance with its instructions...
Click to read more »start smaller, but only because of the nature of CfD. The proposal here is no different from other CfDs like Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2026_May_13#Literary...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:CFD/W? — xaosflux Talk 23:38, 26 July 2007 (UTC) Almost the same as the CFDS one, only with the CFDS part replaced with [[<insert CFD discussion...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:CFD#NOMWP:CFD#NOM You may use Twinkle to facilitate CfD nominations. To install Twinkle, go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-gadgets...
Click to read more »rename categories at Wikipedia:CFDS. Convert and orphan templates at Wikipedia:TFD/H. Empty or move categories at Wikipedia:CFD/WU. Orphan stub types from...
Click to read more »At the end of a CFD to move Automobile/Motor Manufacturers to the "Company of Foo" format, there seemed to be a good body of opinion in favour but with...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:CFD/WUWP:CFD/WU WP:CFDWUWP:CFDWU If process guidelines are met, move categories to the appropriate section here to prepare to delete. Before...
Click to read more »WP:CFD, CFD, or cfd). Ensure the category was properly tagged and listed on WP:CFD. You may consider reading the specific discussion found on the CFD day...
Click to read more »Shortcut WP:CFD/TWP:CFD/T See Wikipedia:Categories for deletion policies for the official rules of this page, and how to do cleanup. Deletion of a category...
Click to read more »something similar. Sure, there are wider failings with CFDS. There should be perma-logging of all CFD/S nominations, whatever their fate; the record should...
Click to read more »existing bots handle categories listed at WP:CFD/W, after being discussed at WP:CFD or listed at WP:CFD/S. — JJMC89 (T·C) 17:57, 14 September 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »protection of WP:CFD/W has been in place for about 7 years, and the only adverse effect of it is that non-admins are unable to close CFDs which result in...
Click to read more »this page. The result was delete. Sandstein 22:21, 3 February 2015 (UTC) Cfd analysis of evacuated solar still (edit | talk | history | protect | delete |...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:CFD/UIWP:CFD/UI WP:UCFD/IWP:UCFD/I This is a list of user category discussions, including deletion reviews, from March 2007 through March...
Click to read more »every letter of the alphabet, not to mention the single-item CFDs mixed in amongst various CFDs since the process of trying to form consensus on these began...
Click to read more »the standard CFD process, the archives of which are located here. ^As of 5 April 2009,user categories are included in the standard CFD process, the archives...
Click to read more »livedrawcambodia.cfd: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports:...
Click to read more »Non-defining and not grouping articles about similar topics. See previous CFDs e.g. Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_August_22#Category:Ani...
Click to read more »placing explanatory text at the top of the category page in lieu of endless CFDs. From what little Ohio history I remember from long ago, much of northeast...
Click to read more »Palestine or Ambassador of Palestine are not ambiguous. Take for instance this CfD where Category:Foreign relations of Ireland was preferred over alternative...
Click to read more »1913 presidents: Robot - Speedily moved per CFDS. Note the 4th diff. By the time listing was removed from CFD/S, no objections were listed. So the move...
Click to read more »has been reached. I brought hundreds of non-admin closes of CfDs (including the use of WP:CFD/W) to my RfA, and not even my harshest critics suggested that...
Click to read more »withdrawn and moved to Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion#Fate of CFDS by the nominator. (non-admin closure) — Godsy (TALKCONT) 01:29, 28 December...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:CFD/W/RWP:CFD/W/R WP:CFDWRWP:CFDWR List categories on this page that are going to be retained (i.e. the CFD result was "Keep" or "No consensus")...
Click to read more »or deleting non-articles vary: Note: The shortcut for all of these is WP:CFDS. Note: The shortcut for all of these is WP:RFD#KEEP. Note: The shortcut for...
Click to read more »xporno.cfd: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on...
Click to read more »and the location of the discussion Some examples: CFDS Category:Marne (department) plus subcats: CFDS listing:[1] tagging example [2] code needed: plain...
Click to read more »to CFD. That will only make for more confrontational CFDs, poorer decision-making, and a much harder job for the admins who monitor and close CFDs. While...
Click to read more »less contentious form. As an infrequent participant at CfD (and an even less frequent closer of CfDs) who has reviewed the original deletion discussion,...
Click to read more »categories at WP:CFDS. We already have bots to handle those requests. Category:The Office (UK TV series) episodes is already under discussion at CFD, so it shouldn't...
Click to read more »this you mean to prevent admins who ever participate in any CFDs from ever closing other CFDs in which they have not participated, I don't see how that...
Click to read more »cfd}} to the talk page of the categories (off course with the necessary parameters). Did Cydebot do this non-automatically? Does this add {{old cfd}}...
Click to read more »trying to follow-up on the 2017 CfDs, some of which I initiated. I wouldn't be opposed to overturning the February 2017 CfD that renamed Category:Television...
Click to read more »Category:London Borough of Sutton, following CFD 2012 June 9 (my proposal, adapted by the discussion). Full list at WP:CFD 2017 February 10/London Borough sub-categories...
Click to read more »notified) Any news on the "finalized on CFD" step? Anomie⚔ 03:15, 24 November 2010 (UTC) Bwilkins asked me to comment on CFDs via bot. Unfortunately, I can't...
Click to read more »have press coverage but it has quite a number of good written articles on CFD and numerical methods. I have already transferred to us four of them and...
Click to read more »– Fayenatic London 16:16, 5 October 2017 (UTC) Rename per thousands of cfds (speedy or otherwise) which follow the name of the article. The out-of-process...
Click to read more »dailymail.cfd: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • blacklist hits • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links...
Click to read more »practice or parlance in the mainspace or the projectspace (mostly at WP:CFD/WP:CFDS). As a whole, this section does not currently enjoy community consensus...
Click to read more »also possibly unfree: CFD A19 LED Light Bulb.gif CFD Water Cooled Copper Cold Plate.gif CFD Vapor Chamber Heat Sink Design v1.gif CFD Photovoltaic Free Convection...
Click to read more »abcbolsa.com/contratos_por_diferencias_cfds.htm. * Links added in this diff: www.abcbolsa.com/contratos_por_diferencias_cfds.htm (8, 9, 6, 1) 2009-06-24 07:39:22...
Click to read more »3 CFDs. Can you please discuss more your qualification to be closing these discussions? A: You are quite correct in that I have only done three CFDs. However...
Click to read more »did. Anyway, from what I've seen at CFD you seem like a sensible bloke. The fact that you have a how-to-close-CFDs checklist on your user page makes me...
Click to read more »to evaluate and close CfDs, and/or to initiate constructive discussions at a CfD-related talk page is "working to improve CfD". Ultimately, there is...
Click to read more »discussion was: procedural closure, nomination has been moved back to WP:CFDS (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC) Propose...
Click to read more »through the contributions and I agree we need someone to care for Cats and CFDs. So he will be a great asset to the project and I could not find a single...
Click to read more »Function overview: Clerking tasks for WP:CFD Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Bot requests#CFD daily subpages Edit period(s): Periodic...
Click to read more »page discussions. GiantSnowman 14:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC) Support per WP:CFDS C2D, match parent article name. GiantSnowman 14:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC) @Paul...
Click to read more »WP:C2D applies to subcats via the last criterion and consensus at many cfds. Oculi (talk) 10:03, 25 March 2020 (UTC) @LaundryPizza03 and Oculi: The nomination...
Click to read more »but don't empty. Early closure per WP:IAR, to declutter CFD. This is one of a series of CFDs on joke user categories which I am closing in exactly in...
Click to read more »(UTC) @JJMC89, Pppery, and DannyS712: yea, Fluxbot for CFDS is only on-demand, I used to process CFDS regularly, but more efficient bots came around. — xaosflux...
Click to read more »there are several related cfds in progress this and similar creations should all be paused pending resolution of existing cfds. (Rather than wasting the...
Click to read more »but don't empty. Early closure per WP:IAR, to declutter CFD. This is one of a series of CFDs on joke user categories which I am closing in exactly in...
Click to read more »it's always better to revert the out-of-process moves and use CFD or CFDS. Using the CFD procedures has four advantages: It helps to ensure that category...
Click to read more »many similar articles were created following the results of a number of CFDs for categories for the cast and crew of various TV series. It was decided...
Click to read more »User:Pastorwayne's activies outside of WP:CFD) User:T. Anthony, User:Flex, Martin (other people peripherally involved through recent WP:CFD nominations) User:Jc37 (moderating...
Click to read more »Category:Côte d'Ivoire articles missing geocoordinate data after a succesful CFDS nomination to rename the category to Category:Ivory Coast articles missing...
Click to read more »a species, have been removed from this category (per the 2007 CFD and more recent CFDs) leaving just the (sort of) eponymous/list article. This category...
Click to read more »other's talk pages. Users stack AFDs and CFDs, often re-appearing from month-long hiatuses to vote on an AFD or CFD. Usually they leave "rhetorical questions"...
Click to read more »merges, or the previous broader CFDs on the same issue. This has been going for years, and has been raised at many previous CFDs. When challenged about this...
Click to read more »discussion was: rename. The other category should be handled ideally via WP:CFDS. MER-C 19:00, 7 October 2020 (UTC) Propose renaming Category:Etimesgut Şekerspor...
Click to read more »Supervised, or Manual: Automatic Programming language(s): AutoWikiBrowser (CFD plugin & Add category function) Source code available: Function overview:...
Click to read more »www.bigtimedaily.com/atfx-raises-its-product-offerings-with-uber-shares-cfds/ (R/Xmeta/L) 2019-07-12 11:42:00 (UTC): w:th:User:à ¸Âà ¸¹à ¹Âà ¸...
Click to read more »subcategories may even need to be deleted altogether. There have even been previous CFDs to rename categories of people with a disease (see Wikipedia:Categories for...
Click to read more »GiantSnowman 14:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC) Support per nom - but why is not at WP:CFDS? GiantSnowman 14:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC) @GiantSnowman That's where I...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:CFD/W/RWP:CFD/W/R WP:CFDWRWP:CFDWR List categories on this page that are going to be retained (i.e. the CFD result was "Keep" or "No consensus")...
Click to read more »I'd say between 0~10 articles have been edited over the course of these 6 CfDs & 383 categories so far (container categories misplaced on articles not withstanding;...
Click to read more »Category cleanup on pages for renamed/deleted categories per Wikipedia:CFD / Wikipedia:CFDS Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Continuously/daily/when...
Click to read more »complex to cover in one huge CFD. There are other CFDs about different parts of the "modern" tree (e.g. this) and assuming these CFDs go through OK they may...
Click to read more »Supervised automatic Programming Language(s): C# dotnetwikibot Function Summary: CFD tasks such as emptying categories of articles and moving articles from one...
Click to read more »April 2020 (UTC) Can anyone close a CFD if there is no consensus? Also, what is one of the most controversial CFDs. SpinnerLaserz (talk) 21:06, 12 April...
Click to read more »Fayenatic London 10:32, 19 October 2022 (UTC) Support = per previous similar cfds. Oculi (talk) 19:19, 22 October 2022 (UTC) Support per nom. — Mugtheboss...
Click to read more »available:No Standard pywikipedia (cfd.py) Function overview:I would be using this bot account to rename categories per WP:CFD Links to relevant discussions...
Click to read more »shows, everything in Category:Television shows by language, not to mention a cfd and a move review, all of whose closers discounted arguments such as this...
Click to read more »this past week. KittyBot – Recategorize pages in categories renamed via CFD. RjwilmsiBot (Task 2) – Tag redirect pages with various templates specified...
Click to read more »are from categories. ExperiencedArticleFixer, you might need to run some CFDs to get those changed first. Primefac (talk) 17:24, 3 June 2021 (UTC) {{BotOnHold}}...
Click to read more »the explicit control of their owners. In order to allow any admin to do CFD related cleanup, a fully automated mechanism for renaming and deleting categories...
Click to read more »starting a nomination to propose his suggestion, but it happens so rarely at CFDS that we may not need to worry too much about what to do when it does happen...
Click to read more »pywikipedia and AWB Function Summary: Replacing or deleting categories for CFD and UCFD; replacing or removing stubs for SFD; WikiProject tagging; Templates...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:BOTREQ#Recategorize, and Working on backlog at Wikipedia:CFD/W and Wikipedia:CFD/WU. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 11:50, 8 December 2007 (UTC) I was...
Click to read more »per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]" /> <summary text="clean up and re-categorisation per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]" /> <summary text="removing category per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]" /> <summary...
Click to read more »particular CFD (assuming, for example, that any subcats are included). If this CFD results in delete then I would expect further (perhaps larger) CFDs to address...
Click to read more »cleanup by Biscuittin. Sandstein 10:03, 10 October 2015 (UTC) Application of CFD in Thermal Power Plant (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links |...
Click to read more »per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]" /> <summary text="clean up and re-categorisation per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]" /> <summary text="removing category per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]" /> <summary...
Click to read more »supporting. I'm aware that there's a shortage of people willing to close CfDs, and it's a necessary but thankless task. EdJohnston 01:42, 4 April 2007...
Click to read more »that tedious repetitive task of replacing and reordering categories after CfDs. I think that his promotion could only benefit Wikipedia. --Latinus (talk...
Click to read more »21st-century categories, as demonstrated at a dozen or more similar recent CFDs (e.g. cyclists, speed skaters, triathletes, canoeists, cricketers, ice hockey...
Click to read more »categories Add/remove/update parameters to templates Following closed TfDs, CfDs an MfDs AWB's general fixes will be done in addition to the main task. There...
Click to read more »that if you want an existing category renamed, you should discuss it on WP:CFD. People sometimes incidentally create categories such as Category:Mozart...
Click to read more »and indirectly contributes to its goals more than all the bland usercat CfDs could ever do. – Uanfala (talk) 16:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC) Delete all As...
Click to read more »Cytreed ft. Rapsta CFD "Jhaajraa" download links: Reverbnation: http://www.reverbnation.com/mccytreed/song/23264301-mc-cytreed-ft-cfd-jhajraa Hulkshare:...
Click to read more »constituencies On CFD - Category:Scottish law to Category:Scots law Cfd discussion - Category:Banks of Scotland Cfd discussion - Category:Glaswegians Cfd discussion...
Click to read more »corresponding talk page. CfDs and RfDs can only be reviewed here if the relevant discussion was limited in scope to renaming; CfDs or RfDs involving deletion...
Click to read more »--barneca (talk) 14:45, 15 February 2008 (UTC) There is also double-voting in cfds on Jan 26, Jan 28, Jan 29, Jan 30, Jan 31, Feb 1, Feb 3, Feb 4, Feb 6, Feb...
Click to read more »(talk) 22:14, 14 March 2016 (UTC) I would support a small change of rules at CFDS but I'm not really sure how we can properly formulate it. Marcocapelle (talk)...
Click to read more »originally nominated at WP:CFDS by Od Mishehu and all were opposed by Djflem. I have moved the discussions here to get them off of the CFDS page. I have included...
Click to read more »merging/moving/emptying required for Wikipedia:CFD using AWB and the CFD plugin. Also want to work on CFD/W Manual and Category:Categories to be moved to...
Click to read more »The result of the discussion was: closed as wrong venue for the proposal. CFD is not for proposing the creation of new categories. Bearcat (talk) 22:20...
Click to read more »pywikipedia Function overview: Performing Category (re)moves as listed on WP:CFD/W Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): This is essentially...
Click to read more »result of the discussion was: procedural close, relisted with sub cats at WP:CFDS. – Fayenatic London 17:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC) Propose renaming Category:Compostela...
Click to read more »| watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: This category just survived a big CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2018 December 15, but my basis...
Click to read more »shown. Looks good so far - should there be some mention of telling tfd and cfd about any new templates? If so, there are three ways that this could be done...
Click to read more »mid-2010. I put this up at CFDS, but there were concerns that a category that had been renamed at CfD shouldn't go through CFDS, even though the rationale...
Click to read more »Wikipedia sockpuppets of Pokamona. And the other IP is only commenting on CFDs in support. [1] [2] In general their behavior is fairly suspicious to be...
Click to read more »as there was no consensus at CFDS. Option A rename to Category:Television game show fan user templates (2 votes at CFDS); option B rename to Category:Television...
Click to read more »should be listed; if they are not, then need to be assessed at WP:TFD or WP:CFD. Many of the unapproved ones will need renaming to conform with stub standards...
Click to read more »else I can do. Function Summary: Will change categories due to Wikipedia:CFD, mostly in substed userbox and other large categories. Edit period(s) (e...
Click to read more »digging through the CFD history, I've realized that we've been down this path before, on dozens of cities. I added a few related CFDs above, but there are...
Click to read more »correct nomenclature and has survived all our previous cfds. It is wearying to see such cfds reopened time and time again. Moonraker (talk) 07:08, 27...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This list was created in good faith following a Cfd but only duplicates content from List of assassinations of the Sri Lankan...
Click to read more »other characters are case sensitive, so {{CFD}} and {{Cfd}} are not the same. For high-use templates like {{Cfd}}, redirects from capitalizations that an...
Click to read more »(UTC) Neutral. After the closure of the CFD discusison by another admin, I created this list to implement the CFD consensus that information in the category...
Click to read more »but don't empty. Early closure per WP:IAR, to declutter CFD. This is one of a series of CFDs on joke user categories which I am closing in exactly in...
Click to read more »also related CFDs regarding protagonists (and more protagonists), femme fatales, and antagonists. See also "Fictional anti-heroes" CFD for yet another...
Click to read more »(UTC) Template:Cfd all (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) All cfd templates have now been converted to use Module:Cfd making this redundant...
Click to read more »Source code available: standard AWB Function overview: Tagging a bunch of CFD's Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia:Categories...
Click to read more »Summary: Categorization work per CFD Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): as needed to fulfill requests at CFD Edit rate requested: 5 edits...
Click to read more »ProveIt's work on WP:CfD and his approach are reason enough. With admin privileges, he'll also be able to delete categories after CfDs, etc – if anyone's...
Click to read more »previous CfDs on categorization by MTV Video Award winners suggest this category is overcategorization per WP:OC#Award (see Cfd 2006 Jul 23 and CfD 2010 Oct...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: meteodyn.com/en/logiciels/cfd-wind-modelling-software-meteodynwt (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2015-04-13 14:00:47...
Click to read more »non-project-related edits (even if about WP:ORE pages) such as WP:AFD, WP:CFD, WP:DRV, etc. These editors are administrators on the English Wikipedia....
Click to read more »the CFDs are closed as delete) then the parent cats can be deleted/upmerged by a separate CFD (and it's a bit late to put them back into this CFD now)...
Click to read more »no need, nor authority, for CfD to 'authorise' the creation of a category. The passage of seven years since the original CfD and five years since the creation...
Click to read more »so it belongs at WP:CFD. @User:Vmavanti, if you wish to pursue this proposal for deletion, please open a discussion at WP:CFD. You can do so by using...
Click to read more »of Ireland had (city) appended to their category names after a series of cfds in 2011 carefully argued by User:Laurel Lodged and BHG, the last being Kilkenny:...
Click to read more »similar change at WP:CFD Rename in line with other New Zealand region categories, dependent on result of ongoing discussion at CFD. Grutness...wha? 01:48...
Click to read more »history | links | watch | logs) (diff !top) - Link: meteodyn.com/en/logiciels/cfd-wind-modelling-software-meteodynwt (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2015-04-13 14:00:47...
Click to read more »Category:Great Britain MP (1707–1800) stubs per MOS:DASH. I had this listed at WP:CFDS, but was told I needed to come here even for uncontroversial renaming of...
Click to read more »Programming Language(s): AWB Function Summary: Category tagging/untagging for CFD/UCFD Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): as needed to...
Click to read more »i do try not to whine here. Of course, i do tend to go on and on at AFD/CFD, in which case, mea culpa:)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:07, 22 December 2013...
Click to read more »categories, and to support that assertion you cite a specific CFD. I cited two additional CFDs to demonstrate that there is no such across-the-board shift...
Click to read more »organization. Nominator's rationale: Recent consensus. The view at the recent cfd for Sweden was that 'organisation' should only be used when there is a strong...
Click to read more »CFD. What's the rush? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 20:31, 30 October 2012 (UTC) There's no requirement to notify category creators of CfDs....
Click to read more »page does not add it to, or remove it from, the main page at WP:AFD, WP:CFD, WP:TFD, etc. If you want to nominate a page for deletion, go through the...
Click to read more »following concerns: Discussions at Wikipedia:Categories for deletion (WP:CFD) focus on a single category, when the discussion often needs to address a...
Click to read more »Rlquall 01:31, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC) Invalid nomination. Categories should go to CFD, not VFD. Please withdraw your nomination here and nominate it for deletion...
Click to read more »location Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary category layer. See previous CFDs e.g. in March. Note: These categories were created by the now-blocked R567/Caftaric...
Click to read more »discussed at CFD not VFD use the {{cfd}} tag. ~~~~ ( ! | ? | * ) 19:23, 10 August 2005 (UTC) Speedy delist - and let the nominator take it to CfD. See, even...
Click to read more »of your recent contributions" isn't appropriate. Note: Some of NotWith's CFDs from a while ago (e.g. Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_Augu...
Click to read more »suggested WP:CFDS, not WP:CFD. CFDS is much quicker and easier. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:39, 28 May 2018 (UTC) Ah, misread you. I've never seen CFDS before...
Click to read more »Language(s): AWB (and pywikipedia sometimes) Function Summary: Working on Wikipedia:CFD/W Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Occasionally, when...
Click to read more »there was no "clear consensus ... reached for retention" in the previous CfDs. They were all closed as "no consensus". Good Ol’factory (talk) 20:42, 1...
Click to read more »categorization within wikipedia. I have noticed that folks working on WP:CFD are over worked. Since I create a lot of the work for them, I thought it...
Click to read more »stable for some months. Oculi (talk) 10:47, 4 February 2019 (UTC) Support per CFDS C2D (match parent article name). GiantSnowman 11:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Template:Ucfd top with Template:Cfd top and Template:Ucfd bottom with Template:Cfd bottom. Redundant to {{Cfd top}}/{{Cfd bottom}}. No other namespaces...
Click to read more »18 January 2008 (UTC) Comment. Are you sure you didn't mean to go to WP:CFD? —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 15:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC) Well, seeing...
Click to read more »Michael (talk) 20:42, 16 August 2013 (UTC) Support - when I noticed the CFDS, I thought it was an unnatural name for a category - this is much better...
Click to read more »Assisted: auto Programming Language(s): python Function Summary: interwiki and CFD/W Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): continuous Edit...
Click to read more »Category:Members of the All Party Parliamentary Intellectual Property Group at WP:CFD 2017 December 10. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:28, 10 December...
Click to read more »preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was move to WP:CFD CDC (talk) 21:37, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC) Category is pointless, vitually all the...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was speedily closed and moved to WP:CFD. . alphaChimp laudare 21:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC) I'm not sure if this is...
Click to read more »was keep until Rfar is complete --Kbdank71 13:43, 12 May 2005 (UTC) Empty. Cfd notice was added on Apr 3 by User:Huaiwei. I don't want to get in the middle...
Click to read more »most of which would then be deleted under their new names by another CFD/CFDS ? DexDor (talk) 06:11, 12 August 2013 (UTC) Delete all -- There are a limited...
Click to read more »Marcocapelle (talk) 02:19, 23 August 2017 (UTC) I'll find some previous CfDs. In the past, categories such as anti-Zionists, antisemites, and racists...
Click to read more »Talk 18:21, 29 April 2020 (UTC) Note - elsewhere 'drainage' was added, in 5 cfds on the same day starting with Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/20...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was Dismissed; use CFD. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-25 05:47Z Category:Monrose songs (edit | talk | history...
Click to read more »Comment: I closed your previous CFD for this category, since you withdrew it and opened another. (There should never be two CFDs open at the same time on the...
Click to read more »per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string> <string>clean up and re-categorisation per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string> <string>removing category per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string>...
Click to read more »creation is unwarranted at this time. I know many people who participate in CFDs are stub sorters so I'll see what you think. Carlossuarez46 23:30, 30 November...
Click to read more »Wikipedia talk:Categories for discussion#Implementing_the_merger_of_SFD_to_CFD. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:46, 15 June 2012 (UTC) Propose...
Click to read more »to this page. The result of the discussion was Speedy close and move to CFD, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 09:23,...
Click to read more »and CFDS. GiantSnowman 20:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Comment, the nomination was opposed at CFDS, that is exactly the reason why it is now at full CFD. Marcocapelle...
Click to read more »back to CFD. There were numerous flaws with the closure of the November 3 CFD, such as: the closer was WP:INVOLVED; the closure considered CFDs from long...
Click to read more »Runs using AWB Function Summary: Wikiproject tagging and work at Wikipedia:CFD/W. Later assignments may include delivering newsletters. Edit period(s) (e...
Click to read more »result of the discussion was delete. There is a consensus to use Template:Cfd all instead of the module. Please make sure all existing functionality is...
Click to read more »should be made to this section. The result of the discussion was: Moved to CFDS. This seems to have slipped through the cracks.. (non-admin closure) Ten...
Click to read more »nomination like this from someone who is so prolific in CFD participation, and even goes so far as to close CFDs. There is a WP:COMPETENCE issue here. --BrownHairedGirl...
Click to read more »non controversial and should be speedily renamed or replaced over at WP:CFDS. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:01, 15 May 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »January 2023 (UTC) Also the category page has not been tagged for CfD. See WP:CFD for instructions. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:34, 8 January 2023 (UTC) Oppose...
Click to read more »I'm adding this comment here, after the "do not modify" archive, because CfDs have no talk pages but the point may be important should similar matters...
Click to read more »2008 (UTC) permcat and it's subcats now listed on cfd. Waacstats (talk) 22:11, 9 September 2008 (UTC) CFD has now closed as rename so can this be renamed...
Click to read more »uncontroversional WP:C2C nomination and should better have been posted at CFDS. Marcocapelle (talk) 03:34, 19 September 2016 (UTC) In principle support...
Click to read more »Summary: Rectaegorization (based on discussions on medians such as Wikipedia:CFD) Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Assisted but automated...
Click to read more »w:es:Contrato por diferencia (diff top) - Link: www.guiabroker.com/brokers-cfds/ (R/Xmeta/L- still there) 2021-12-17 12:50:32 (UTC): w:es:User:185.153.150...
Click to read more »navigation, per above and per all of these CFDs from the last year. Contrary to Ephebi's claim above past CFDs have not found the term to be accepted. Timrollpickering...
Click to read more »'alumni' in cfds. In contrast there has been substantial support since Jan 2011 for the 'People educated at' formulation; eg Old Edwardians cfd in Jan 2011...
Click to read more »Programming Language(s): Wikipedia:AWB Function Summary: Wikipedia:CFD/W & Wikipedia:CFD/WU Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Daily...
Click to read more »to the average reader. (See the CFD below, for the related Category:Maar volcanoes.) Notified creator with {{subst:cfd-notify}} Cgingold (talk) 21:50,...
Click to read more »film subcat. The reason I didn't take this to WP:CFDS is I see that that another editor applied to a Cfd tag to Category:Documentary films about health...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result of the debate was belongs at WP:CFD, not WP:AFD. User:Angr 17:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC) senseless category, not uncommon...
Click to read more »Precious bodily fluids 20:18, 20 January 2017 (UTC) Keep all – per previous cfds, such as this one. Category names must be unambiguous. Oculi (talk) 21:16...
Click to read more »111.224.202 (talk) 23:40, 31 March 2012 (UTC) Leveraged products such as CFDs appear attractive because they offer the potential for large gains on a small...
Click to read more »frog) is found in a particular country is WP:NON-DEFINING. Example similar CFDs. DexDor (talk) 10:01, 18 March 2018 (UTC) Comment, there are a whole lot...
Click to read more »(talk) 00:45, 17 December 2015 (UTC) Comment In case no one noticed: The CfD template has been removed from Category:Deceased Filipino actors and actresses...
Click to read more »earlier opposed at CFDS. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:56, 16 July 2020 (UTC) @BrownHairedGirl and Thincat: pinging contributors to CFDS discussion. Marcocapelle...
Click to read more »an NPOV encyclopedia, not to wave political placards around. Yes, I know CFD only deal with categories; that's why I made this a comment rather than a...
Click to read more »taken to CFD in January and Kept? While I basically share your sentiments as to the merits of the categories, I really hate to see repeat CFDs this close...
Click to read more »Category:Historic house museums in Florida, you are welcome to list it at WP:CFD. None-admin closure. Pie is good (Apple is the best) 22:01, 20 September...
Click to read more »more numerous instances where CFD has deleted similar categories as WP:OC#OVERLAPPING — this has been tried in Canada and CFD deleted it, this has been tried...
Click to read more »appear to have an over-strict interpretation of the wording); it's common for CFDs to discuss whether a category's inclusion criteria should be changed (as...
Click to read more »very unhelpful, as is the failure to include a copy of the discussion at WP:CFDS and above all the failure to tag the categories either for the speedy nomination...
Click to read more »renaming under one of the following options: There has been a series of cfds on this topic started by User:Od Mishehu in 2017, the premise being that...
Click to read more »AutoWikiBrowsers CfD plugin to recategorise or remove categories listed at WP:CFDW, if the other bots don't do it. Don't we already have 6 CfD bots? →Σσς. (Sigma)...
Click to read more »level of engagement in that CFD was par for the course, not notably different from what I've seen in hundreds of other CFDs which were not immediately...
Click to read more »display of CentralNotices on Wikipedia Proposal to add a requirement at WP:CFD that category creators be notified RfC to rename the tab title from "discussion"...
Click to read more »with outcome of CFD i.e change to whatever CFD decides to use. Waacstats (talk) 08:12, 25 August 2009 (UTC) Note - the relevant CFD has been closed as...
Click to read more »similar to what I said when I closed the CFD for Jewish mathematicians. So I went back and reread the previous CFDs, and reread our guidelines about categorization...
Click to read more »occasionally speedily deleted at WP:CFD too, per the same criteria as in other forums (e.g. G4 or G7). In addition, at WP:CFDS there is explicit admin instruction...
Click to read more »discussion was: Procedural close as premature. Much better to open a new CFD to reflect the outcome of the Requested Moves discussion, whenever that happens...
Click to read more »be made to this page. The result of the debate was MOVE DISCUSSION TO WP:CFD. — JIP | Talk 05:46, 9 December 2005 (UTC) Given that over 80 percent of...
Click to read more »here to warrant a category, as has been supported in a series of recent CFDs for recording artists. WP:OCAT needs to be updated and clarified on this...
Click to read more »the result would be way more solid than some fragmentary, cherry-picked CfDs. And the "Deaths by cause" categories-structure is IMO so wide, complex and...
Click to read more »Od Mishehu 15:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC) User:Od Mishehu launched a series of cfds on this topic in 2017, the premise being that a given country should use...
Click to read more »page[1] has four such CFDS. I can point out 100 plus more. That's not an exaggeration. Go to this User talk page[2] and see how many CFD notices there are...
Click to read more »Shortcuts WP:CFD/UIWP:CFD/UI WP:UCFD/IWP:UCFD/I This is a list of user category discussions, including deletion reviews, from March 2007 through March...
Click to read more »Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y Function Details: CFD/W using pywikipediabot's category.py file When you say CFD/W, what exactly do you mean? What specifically...
Click to read more »subcategories, at the same time as implementing these as a replacement. CFD has already established a consensus, per Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021...
Click to read more »cause difficulty for readers unfamiliar with WP:DASH. See several recent CFDs here and here which rejected such usage. (oops, forgot to sign) Otto4711...
Click to read more »finish before this CfD would normally close. Plantdrew (talk) 15:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC) There's no rush (I've had these cats on a CFD to-do list for years)...
Click to read more »WP:CFDS is not the procedure for non-controversial moves, it is a procedure available to editors for moves which satisfy one or more of the WP:CFDS#Speedy...
Click to read more »two separate CFDs -- so it needs to be consolidated in one place. Therefore, one of these CFDs needs to be Speedy closed. (The other CFD is here.) Cgingold...
Click to read more »Cfd discussion - Merge Category:Members of the United Kingdom Parliament from Northern Ireland constituencies to Category:British MPs The name "Northern...
Click to read more »region, which is not a defining feature and is just WP:OCAT. Also see past CfDs at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2015_July_17#Category:Talukas_in_Vidarbha...
Click to read more »roughly weekly). Addition of by-month alphabetical indices for Wikipedia:CFD, e.g. Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Archive_debates/2007_January_index...
Click to read more »the category is empty is because the CFD nominator did so before creating this discussion. That is a no-no per WP:CFD....William, is the complaint department...
Click to read more »(with caveat) - I support uniformity with whatever decision is reached at CFD. If the categories there are changed this shoudl be -if not, then this shouldn't...
Click to read more »WP:CFD Template:LS1957-Jaipur (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) and Category:LS1957 templates(edit talk links history) per WP:CFD...
Click to read more »March 2016 (UTC) User:Oculi: Well, that's not really an answer for CFD, since AFD and CFD are two different things. I'm not particularly interested in criticising...
Click to read more »January 2012 (UTC) Comment it's a category redirect, not a hard redirect. CFD has handled category redirects in the past. Categories have special issues...
Click to read more »easier if these "CFD maintenance" bots would link to the CFD decision they claim to be implementing. As far as I can tell, there was a mass-CFD for all Actors...
Click to read more »belongs to CFD, not AFD. --Terence Ong 14:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC) Yes. Oops. Sorry. Anyhow, it would be nice if someone cold help move this to CFD, or simply...
Click to read more »administrative work do you intend to take part in? A: Initially, closing CFDs. I may occasionally do PRODs or other XfDs. It would be handy to be able...
Click to read more »Comment: The company is the first one who launched its token that uses the CFD platform. We as Wikipedia editors can add more resources and make the page...
Click to read more »postdlf (talk) 17:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC) "in a better and wider forum?" CfD is the best and widest forum we have for discussing categories. --PanchoS...
Click to read more »February 2012 (UTC) Speedy close, wrong forum. Categories are dealt with at WP:CFD, and that's where you need to go to ask for agreement to merge Category:Financial...
Click to read more »subpages. See: Categorizing user pages Cues for bots, such as the <!--BEGIN CFD TEMPLATE--> on categories being discussed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion...
Click to read more »(t - c; 8) to w:mn:Санхүү (diff !top) - Link: www.avatrade.mn/cfd-trading/what-are-cfds (R/Xmeta/L- removed) 2019-11-19 18:33:07 (UTC): w:mn:User:121...
Click to read more »Oppose for now. This overlaps with the issues discussed in the still unclosed CFD 2017 December 24#Years_in_Ukraine/Yekaterinoslav_Governorate. It would be...
Click to read more »scholarship has been done on the subject. This has been outlined in numerous prior cfds. This category has been around and being used for 6 months, and is part of...
Click to read more »per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]" /> <summary text="clean up and re-categorisation per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]" /> <summary text="removing category per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]" /> <summary...
Click to read more »AB AFD AIV AN AN3 ANI BL CFD CSD DRV HD MFD OP PER PP PRD PT RFA RFD RFP RFR RFU RM SSP TFD UN UTM VP WL...
Click to read more »of these should be deleted, I would not be averse to requiring separate CFDs to "make sure." Your general thrust has merit, but the problem is that the...
Click to read more »the discussion was: procedural close, the category has been renamed at WP:CFDS (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 06:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC) Propose...
Click to read more »@StAnselm: you can propose simple spelling, caps, and grammar fixes to WP:CFDS. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC) Speedy to correct capitalisaton...
Click to read more »per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string> <string>clean up and re-categorisation per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string> <string>removing category per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string>...
Click to read more »Football Confederation. -- Cheers, Riley 15:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC) use CfD. Werieth (talk) 15:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Pretty straightforward. I don't...
Click to read more »Marcocapelle (talk) 09:41, 25 March 2018 (UTC) Keep - this was a rename at cfd. The point is that Category:Tatars should be (by convention) a list category...
Click to read more »notified. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC) A CFD is a public discussion, and the CFDs of usercats have been just as public as any other. The...
Click to read more »useless and nonencyclopedic. Delete it.64.109.253.204 03:34, 19 July 2005 (UTC) Comment I have changed this to a Cfd. ∞Who?¿? 03:37, 19 July 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »these CFDs look like a case of 'I don't like it'. This should go to WP:Categorization for a more thorough debate rather than have a small handful of CFD regulars...
Click to read more »years now. It long ago received approval for implementing the results of CFD debates as entered on Wikipedia:CFDW (a page which, I might add, is only...
Click to read more »elsewhere, to merge with something that might not exist, depending on which cfds close first. Oculi (talk) 10:57, 13 February 2020 (UTC) Comment, of the articles...
Click to read more »potential renaming, please post the category for further discussion at WP:CFD. Note that many of the unproposed ones may need to be renamed/rescoped/reworded...
Click to read more »you have not even acknowledged that this is a problem. Also, the CFD instructions WP:CFD#Manual_nominations clearly says For nominations involving large...
Click to read more »re-naming JarrahTree 02:03, 17 April 2016 (UTC) Await closure of the open CFDs and then close to match. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:55, 20 April 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »right that there will be more CFDs once the RFC is over. However, if the underlying principles have been agreed, then the CFDs will be much more straightforward...
Click to read more »discussion was: No Consensus - This is made even more clear by the past CfDs noted by Occuli and User:Otto4711. And Otto's final point is well taken....
Click to read more »nom, clarity and past CFDs. This isn't even the correct internal jargon but a confusing hybrid that has been preserved in past CFDs by "Keep - it's correct"...
Click to read more »Comment – the other editor is the one who should have brought the matter to cfd, rather than removing Wales Rugby League from a valid category. This said...
Click to read more »before. A repeated threat of unnecessary deletion by a KNF despite earlier CFD-87. Suggested changes reverted back to meet Wiki standards. Discussion closed...
Click to read more »as no substantial reason has been given for deletion. CFDs like this add to the workload at CFD and (depending on the outcome) may add to watchlist noise...
Click to read more »confusing. This is a sandbox to work on WP:CFD. Just look at thw history. If it is to be kept, a history merge with CFD would be the most logical course. Sandboxes...
Click to read more »category. A similar category for West Ham United F.C. was the subject of a CfD in October 2007 - see [1] Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 21:47, 30 September 2008...
Click to read more »"Georgia (U.S. state)" already existed. Rlevse 14:59, 12 January 2006 (UTC) Shouldn't this be cfd, not afd? Tedernst | talk 21:11, 15 January 2006 (UTC)...
Click to read more »undo a year-long consensus that was established over the course of many CFDs. Otto4711 (talk) 14:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC) If I can undo a consensus on...
Click to read more »relative surprise it might spring given the passing of much time since the CfDs. Splash - tk 11:24, 31 January 2014 (UTC) Oppose. There is no deadline. --BrownHairedGirl...
Click to read more »even the CFDs themselves sometimes served as the platform as LGBT WikiProject members were sometimes the only people participating in the CFD discussions...
Click to read more »categories) the word "deuterostomes" is rather specialist. See related recent CFD. DexDor (talk) 20:28, 6 March 2018 (UTC) Merge - the single article Clavelina...
Click to read more »categories. This policy is to help delete useless stubs without bothering the WP:CFD and WP:TFD process for both the stub and category. Additionally, this helps...
Click to read more »ever did. Of course I participated in the CFD on Category:Kurdish inhabited regions, as I did the previous CFD. I have been attempting to categorise Kurdish...
Click to read more »read/obey such a note, (2) we haven't generally done that with previous similar CFDs (some of which are listed here), (3) any such note would only last until...
Click to read more »if it's possible. Cfd result has one field for date, whereas Old CfD requires pipes between the three parts of the date. Also, in Cfd result, the field...
Click to read more »but don't empty. Early closure per WP:IAR, to declutter CFD. This is one of a series of CFDs on joke user categories which I am closing in exactly in...
Click to read more »discussion below. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:38, 24 March 2022 (UTC) @Gonnym: pinging CFDS nominator too. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC) If they are...
Click to read more »recently renamed at CFD March 12, against the guidance in Wikipedia:Category_names#Socio-cultural_topics. I supported the change in that CFD because I was of...
Click to read more »other way (to match the article) satisfies the speedy criterion C2D: WP:CFDS. Eg Category:Compositions_by_Don_Davis is at present a speedy in exactly...
Click to read more »apologise for listing categories here, but this is an unusual case and a CFD nomination was closed as no consensus by a new admin without regards to the...
Click to read more »Hill category wasn't left out of the previous CFD by accident — it didn't even exist at the time of the CFD nomination, and was created sometime between...
Click to read more »page. The result of the debate was no consensus, should be listed at WP:CFD if at all. —Cleared as filed. 04:22, 2 January 2006 (UTC) Redundant Category...
Click to read more »comprehensive history of all user category discussions on Wikipedia, including CFDs since the closure of Wikipedia:User categories for discussion, RFDs of user...
Click to read more »categories. DexDor (talk) 16:15, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Merge per previous cfd and other cfds. Oculi (talk) 17:29, 10 November 2017 (UTC) Merge per many precedents...
Click to read more »to take part in? A: I regularly participate in CFDs so I would probably take part in closing some CFDs that I do not participate in. Likely I would do...
Click to read more »sense to wait until the later nominations are closed here at CFDS and then move all to CfD after that. Sorry I overlooked your question yesterday. Marcocapelle...
Click to read more »forms - see these three CFDs which rejected the likes of "Old King's" and several "Old Edwardians". Further more in some of the CFDs both Moonraker2 & I list...
Click to read more »renaming" as defined on WP:CFD. Changing these conventions shall require a consensual discussion either directly at WP:CFD or publicized there. National...
Click to read more »particular Cfd,I oppose per Kbdank71. ∞Who?¿? 08:42, 1 August 2005 (UTC) I think that the consensus was to use "film" in most of the CfD discussions...
Click to read more »Category:Fb team templates AFC Champions League(edit talk links history) per WP:CFD Template:Fb team Esteghlal (IRI) (talk · history · transclusions · logs ·...
Click to read more »20 Mar 2005 (UTC) Notes: This issue was also discussed in the previous CFD attempt. Zzyzx11 20:08, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC) This issue is not about renaming...
Click to read more »first whether the CFDS proposal has any opposition. MapReader (talk) 20:24, 23 February 2020 (UTC) I will most happily confirm that the CFDS proposal so far...
Click to read more »00:56, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Speedy close, this is a category. Please see WP:CFD. --Dhartung | Talk 01:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Comment I think they were trying...
Click to read more »looked at this, supposedly indicating "a clear precedent". There were similar CfDs that I remember taking part in, that resulted in "keep", that are conveniently...
Click to read more »nominated here for deletion, would someone be willing to help with adding a cfd template? The template syntax can be copied from this category page. Marcocapelle...
Click to read more »selected by consensus and has been used for some time now: see this CFD; more recent CFDs have followed, along the same lines of argument. Good Ol’factory...
Click to read more »from the arguments for keeping the article. In other words, arguments in CFDs don't translate well to AFDs. Pablo Talk | Contributions 08:09, 29 October...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:43, 24 December 2012 (UTC) Rename; why didn't you put this at WP:CFDS? It's highly important that category names follow article names, and since...
Click to read more »Peterkingiron, Laurel Lodged, and Johnpacklambert: as participants in the previous CFD. – Fayenatic London 23:50, 13 September 2017 (UTC) Oppose. Sometimes the...
Click to read more »moved back as this is already at cfd. Moreover Johndavies837 should be rebuked for emptying a category undergoing cfd. Oculi (talk) 16:41, 20 February...
Click to read more »The article is at Asset health management. I've brought this to CFD rather than to CFDS because deletion of this category could also be considered. DexDor...
Click to read more »seems to exactly duplicate Category:Hospitals in Manchester, so some WP:CFD work may be necessary as well. Grutness...wha? 02:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »made to this page. The result of the debate was closed, to be settled by CFD. Mailer Diablo 02:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC) Here's the article in question:[1]...
Click to read more »comment added by 47.54.189.22 (talk) 18:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC) Comment – CfDs by the same nominator with similar rationales are underway at the following...
Click to read more »care either way whether these categories are kept or deleted. Two previous CFDs have supported their deletion, and I'm happy to go with that unless it is...
Click to read more »| talk | history | links | watch | logs) Nominator's rationale: Previous CFDs (this and this) have upmerged categories for individual countries into categories...
Click to read more »result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 13:08, 16 May 2005 (UTC) Empty. Cfd notice added by creator same day category was created. --Kbdank71 17:29,...
Click to read more »page. The result was Speedy close for two reasons. 1: This should be at WP:CFD instead. and 2: Didn't you see the header that says "This category is used...
Click to read more »Withdrawn. — xaosflux Talk 04:52, 24 March 2007 (UTC) Withdraw relisted at WP:CFD - seems a completely meaningless and superfluous category Zeraeph 14:21,...
Click to read more »Category:Architecture of Switzerland by century Nominator's rationale: in line with the CFD above, either Option 1 as listed above, to create consistency with the parent...
Click to read more »categories were deleted, on the effective grounds of WP:OR, following WP:CFD discussions. It is a fact that all Westerns are dramas so a term like Western...
Click to read more »rename, improved wording. This is a new proposal after a brief discussion at CFDS (see collapsed below). Marcocapelle (talk) 08:07, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Support...
Click to read more »bring to CFD. However, the CFD above by Smerus brought the issue to a head more quickly, with a different proposal. Rather than have to separate CFDs relating...
Click to read more »2017 (UTC) Comment – I thought the cfd decision in Oct 2016 to drop 'Roman' was rather bizarre, as previous cfds had been almost unanimous in the opposite...
Click to read more »could be remedied. Number 57 14:22, 21 January 2016 (UTC) Any links to the CFDs? Because that is where consensus is formed on category names. --BrownHairedGirl...
Click to read more »"ecozone" was inserted by CFDS. Note: Any changes resulting from this CFD should also be made (e.g. by a subsequent CFD/CFDS) to other categories (e.g...
Click to read more »avoids the perennial series vs. programme problem. What say we, good folks of CFD? Bearcat (talk) 19:30, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Oppose for now. Not all shows...
Click to read more »make things difficult in that way?" You'll note that I don't post Speedy CfDs like that anymore for precisely that reason. Feel free to be upset about...
Click to read more »1 or 2 entries and as somebody who takes part in CFDs regularly you should know that. See this CFD[1] for just one example and what Bearcat writes in...
Click to read more »has been under discussion for 11 days, in effect allowing the nomintors of CfDs to lock down any development of related articles and categories while the...
Click to read more »"Contents by type". CN1 (talk) 13:03, 9 October 2016 (UTC) Now I started CFDs to rename the two topic categories [here]. CN1 (talk) 14:06, 9 October 2016...
Click to read more »per nom and per past CFDs. Timrollpickering (talk) 14:12, 1 March 2012 (UTC) Rename per nom and per precedent in many similar CFDs in 2012. Oculi (talk)...
Click to read more »addition to what Peter said, this nomination is invalid as categories go on WP:CFD and articles have to be nominated individually on WP:VFD, and cannot be deleted...
Click to read more »problematic in a number of cases. There are currently a number of other open CFDs aiming to rename quite a few existing categories using the word "people"...
Click to read more »namespace are done through WP:CFD, this is also evidenced from a lot of these category redirects which have backlinks to CFD (none to RFD afaik), where they...
Click to read more »per nom and previous cfds. Oculi (talk) 09:46, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Support – per nom and previous cfds. Assuming that the other CFD passes, it will then...
Click to read more »RevelationDirect (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2019 (UTC) Delete - See CFDs for similar categories (example CFD). If the origin of a name is important/interesting then...
Click to read more »review). The result of the discussion was procedural close. Will be listing at CFD Primefac (talk) 01:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC) Template:Zimbabwe-cricket-season-stub (talk ·...
Click to read more »capitalization Greg Bard (talk) 22:42, 18 March 2014 (UTC) You could list this at WP:CFDS as a C2A — a straightforward situation like this doesn't require debate....
Click to read more »WP:C2D nomination at CFDS. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:25, 17 April 2020 (UTC) @BrownHairedGirl and Brandmeister: pinging contributors to CFDS discussion. Marcocapelle...
Click to read more »category. Should be deleted per WP:OC#Eponymous and numerous CFDs as precedent, such as this CFD 2007 Sep 19. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 10:45,...
Click to read more »(UTC) Oppose A good editor, but I'm worried about his particiapation in CFDs and AFDs, while he is very active there, but what I seen from him, most of...
Click to read more »Johnbod (talk) 09:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC) Upmerge per nom. This follows other CFD discussions on related topics yesterday. Peterkingiron (talk) 11:48, 15 August...
Click to read more »own previous CFD for Category:Groups challenging the official account of the September 11 attacks -- nor for the other recent, related CFD that resulted...
Click to read more »per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string> <string>clean up and re-categorisation per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string> <string>removing category per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string>...
Click to read more »been categorizing articles in these by-country categories. Example previous CFD: vertebrates DexDor (talk) 17:17, 12 May 2018 (UTC) Support common sense...
Click to read more »list was deleted at CFD 2009 Nov 7. The broader Category:Global warming skeptics was deleted at CFD 2008 August 7 and again at CFD 2009 Dec 7. --BrownHairedGirl...
Click to read more »also: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#One CFD withdrawn needs closing, other CFDs apparent bad faith by User:Jc37 for the WP:AN/I noted above...
Click to read more »Category:Footballers' wives and girlfriends, renamed at cfd from Category:WAGs in 2008 or so and discussed at cfd many times. Oculi (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2022...
Click to read more »Support changes that reduce unnecessary use of specialist terms. See related CFDs such as Deuterostomes_of_Asia. I'm also not sure that this whole categorizing...
Click to read more »(non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 16:38, 24 December 2018 (UTC) Template:Daily_CFD_logs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:Daily_archive_log (talk ·...
Click to read more »September 2017 (UTC) Rebuttal The CFD cited above is not the CFD that I had in mind. I was thinking of the epic CFD of July 8. This date is after the...
Click to read more »football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 12:27, 9 December 2020 (UTC) Support per CFDS C2D, match parent article name. GiantSnowman 12:30, 9 December 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GURPS Halo CambridgeBayWeather 10:23, 13 October 2005 (UTC) MOVED TO CFD. BD2412 talk 22:23, 13 October 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »the topic of Hebrew punctuation. (Category creator notified using Template:Cfd notice) -- Black Falcon (talk) 16:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC) No contest. - Gilgamesh...
Click to read more »Category:Swiss Christian ministers Nominator's Rationale: In countless other CFDs in it has been agreed that "Pastor" is a job title used by certain denominations...
Click to read more »mass CFD noms. So that means that most such sets won't get taken to CFD unless one of the already-overbusy editors does so. And if/when it gets to CFD, there...
Click to read more »More of Joshbaumgartner's category moves from before he was aware of the CFD process. Putting these up for confirmation or refutation. TexasAndroid 20:08...
Click to read more »of a previous debate (such as a "no consensus" result on an RFC, AFD or CFD), it is similarly inappropriate to send a disproportionate number of notifications...
Click to read more »bot-assisted Bot-generated list of new plant- and botany-related articles AFD, TFD, CFD, PROD, RFD Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2011_December_15#Cate...
Click to read more »(UTC) Agree with the latter, I have nominated it with its siblings at WP:CFDS. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:45, 23 July 2019 (UTC) The above is preserved as...
Click to read more »--BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:35, 10 July 2017 (UTC) Support per previous CFDs....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:50, 12 July...
Click to read more »No further edits should be made to this page. The result was relist at CfD. -- Kjkolb 00:52, 24 July 2006 (UTC) I propose that this category should...
Click to read more »fix, and I know you're more used to CFD, which works slightly differently] Grutness...wha? Rename per nom and per CFD discussion; FWIW, all but the smallest...
Click to read more »category by CFD in 2008; a further CFD in 2009 changed from using the borough short name to the long name. See also this, this and this cfd. Each borough...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is a non notable CFD provider that has little history and is promotional, references are promotional...
Click to read more »What lot of self identify categories have you tagged? Did you follow the CFD that led to this? —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC) I see you...
Click to read more »SimonP 03:05, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC) Keep - This was already discussed here on CFD (Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/unresolved#Category:Occupations and all...
Click to read more »it's even more of a subjective assessment. Notified creator with {{subst:cfd-notify}} Good Ol’factory (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2009 (UTC) I gingerly oppose...
Click to read more »September 2013 (UTC) Note: WikiProject Canadian music has been notified using {{Cfd-notify}}. -- Black Falcon (talk) 19:34, 22 September 2013 (UTC) keep these...
Click to read more »Category:Organizations by country was renamed to use 'based in' at cfd in 2006. Similar cfds favouring 'based in' were: Women's organizations in 2017; Disability...
Click to read more »time) didn't really understand categorization. Some examples of previous CFDs for categorization based on what trails things are on: 2013, 2016 DexDor...
Click to read more »rationale: Unlike Category:Fictional heroes, which itself is currently at CfD, this category does not have a mythology counterpart, so it is just an unnecessary...
Click to read more »17 November 2016 (UTC) Rename to match article name, per convention in cfds since the dawn of wikipedia. Oculi (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Rename...
Click to read more »and characters as per Category:Hanna-Barbera and Cartoon Network Studios Cfd's. --Kbdank71 17:30, 25 July 2005 (UTC) Rename, as I presume Who know's what...
Click to read more »[3] Moreover, the principle of these renamings has been accepted at the CFDs in May-June 2013. – Fayenatic London 22:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC) Fair enough...
Click to read more »this section. Non-admin close. This is already under discussion on May 21 CFD. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 16:17, 30 May 2013 (UTC) The following discussion...
Click to read more »sub0cats have been upheld at CFD; if you want to propose the deletion of Category:County Dublin and its sub-cats, do so at CFD. That's what you should have...
Click to read more »legitimate view, but needs a CFD to achieve consensus. However, the primitive category software makes constructing a big group CFD nomination a daunting task...
Click to read more »the merged template name per WP:C2D with {{cfr-speedy}} and list it at WP:CFDS. Check incomings links via "What links here" and remove links to deleted...
Click to read more »nominated again. Indeed, that should have happened before either of the CfDs for this page. SpinningSpark 08:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC) Propose deleting...
Click to read more »because then it will be no different to the existing mechanism at WP:CFD/WP:CFDS i.e. you propose a rename and if approved it gets done by an admin/bot...
Click to read more »deletion or merger to take it upon himself to prune the categories while the CFD is pending, and then to use the reduced category membership as further support...
Click to read more »Marcocapelle (talk) 12:14, 1 October 2022 (UTC) Support all - per similar recent cfds. 'People from the UK' would certainly include people in the UK. Oculi (talk)...
Click to read more »templating Removing or renaming categories per the decisions of Wikipedia:CFD BetacommandBot is approved for no other tasks; without prejudice to the generality...
Click to read more »Category:People educated by school in England, which has been supported in numerous CfDs over the last year. The Old Fooians format for former pupils is used by a...
Click to read more »discussion was: procedural close. This is the wrong venue; please use WP:CFD instead. bibliomaniac15 20:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC) Category:Defunct broadcast...
Click to read more »the one article in it and re-creation of category previously deleted at CFD. DexDor (talk) 22:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC) Speedy delete per WP:G4. Marcocapelle...
Click to read more »as an obvious end-run around the CFD decision. When an editor has already participated in a DRV and the subsequent CFD relisted at their request, this...
Click to read more »21:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC) Rename per nom and consensus at a multitude of cfds, that a category name should be the article name, or less ambiguous than...
Click to read more »just 1 subcat, of albums typically, hundreds of which have been deleted at cfd. Oculi (talk) 23:50, 19 February 2019 (UTC) Delete All per WP:SMALLCAT. If...
Click to read more »fair use images in user spaces and swap out image for another upon request; CFD/W as well. Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run):Continuous...
Click to read more »here and others would be strongly against it. The category was nominated at CFDS for renaming to Category:Disputed leaders but that does not solve the issue...
Click to read more »result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. Withdrawn—I was not aware of the CfD; for some reason it was not findable from the history of the relevant categories...
Click to read more »consensus at cfd in 2006, is Category:Organizations based in Sweden. The way to change the convention is to establish a new consensus at cfd, which is what...
Click to read more »duplicates or unrequired ones (see also Wikipedia:User categorisation and WP:CFD). Please raise any other issues which need to be identified on the talk page...
Click to read more »"tools" yet. He works closely with User:Kbdank71 [1] (and others) closing CfDs, and is probably the most prolific nominator of Categories for discussion...
Click to read more »page. The result was incorrect nomination; categories are deleted via WP:CFD, not via AfD (Liberatore, 2006). 12:27, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Only 1 article...
Click to read more »speedy category renames (after various batches of nominations at WP:CFD and WP:CFDS), and it's not a task I think we'd want to do again!) Bencherlite 16:26...
Click to read more »09:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC) @Tempjrds and Armbrust: pinging participants of CFDS discussion. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC) Rename per nom...
Click to read more »patrols James Bond-related articles, and lately he's been helping out a lot on CFD. He has a whopping 12029 edits as of just now. [1] He occasionally asks me...
Click to read more »(talk) 17:47, 17 July 2008 (UTC) Keep – it seems very unsatisfactory to have cfds on random subcats of Category:Jews by occupation. Now we have a subcat for...
Click to read more »Clichy (talk) 18:02, 2 September 2019 (UTC) Oppose - Discussion in previous CfDs has often found that church buildings is preferable to churches in denominational...
Click to read more »it'll encourage one of the editors who specialise in multi-category CFDs to do a CFD for other similar categories. DexDor (talk) 21:00, 22 January 2019...
Click to read more »at CFD 2011 January 6, where the outcome was "keep for now". The related category:Male actors was merged after surprisingly little discussion at CFD 2012...
Click to read more »subcategories) Result - delete Overturned by deletion review [3] and sent back to CFD Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 November 15#Category:Terrorists...
Click to read more »suggest that a CFD should usurp that. So instead I propose to delete the categories. I have listed their current contents on subpages of this CFD, so if WP:NRHP...
Click to read more »working on them. If you wanted variety, perhaps you could try WP:TFD and WP:CFD if you haven't already? Not as many people go there, and it would be good...
Click to read more »being super-bold here, but really, do we need these? Consensus from previous CfDs has determined that we do not need categories for musicians, as the musicians'...
Click to read more »--Mike Selinker (talk) 20:01, 31 August 2010 (UTC) Keep – per many similar cfds and rename any subcats which are out of synch. Occuli (talk) 23:47, 31 August...
Click to read more »in casting, but in awards. This is the conclusion that multiple previous CFDs have come to, so that we have Category:American male television actors and...
Click to read more »bibliomaniac15 03:12, 4 June 2020 (UTC) Moved from WP:CFDS: The rename proposal in the previous CFD is a valid one, I agree with it. I don't really know...
Click to read more »of this archived section. The result of the debate was move discussion to CFD. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL June 30, 2005 00:27 (UTC) This category has been replaced...
Click to read more »tagging has to be repeated for a full cfd. Oculi (talk) 12:52, 6 October 2022 (UTC) Support per nom and similar recent cfds. Oculi (talk) 10:52, 6 October 2022...
Click to read more »remains empty for 4 days it can be speedily deleted without going through CFD. Otto4711 (talk) 21:39, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Restore the category as a subcat...
Click to read more »opinion on the author specifically. The category needs to be discussed at WP:CFD Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC) Seems like I...
Click to read more »Category:Sportspeople from Barcelona Nominator's rationale: Per multiple CFDs, here[1], here[2], here[3], here[4] here[5], and here[6] just being six examples...
Click to read more »the accounts, I noticed that they all participated and voted keep in this cfd, their participation in the debate did significantly influence the outcome;...
Click to read more »secondary school categories), there has been little support for 'alumni' in cfds. In contrast there has been substantial support for the 'People educated...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result of the debate was: moved to WP:CFD. — sjorford (talk) 00:03, 5 March 2006 (UTC) Doesn't need a full category...
Click to read more »discussion that is directly relevant to this CFD, I strongly advise one and all to read the adjoining CFDs from October 21 for Category:Fictional Americans...
Click to read more »category clutter.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:32, 29 July 2021 (UTC) In previous CFDs, British and other European categories by term were kept in 2011, but Canadian...
Click to read more »you have a problem with the closures of the CfDs, you know where to find WP:DRV. However, unless those CFD closures are overturned, it makes no sense to...
Click to read more »realized I'd doing a category VfD wrong. I'll figure out how to move this to a cfd later tonight. Or feel free to fix it if you know how. Thanks. Lulu of the...
Click to read more »of you who said "per x previous CfD". Please clarify what arguement(s) in those previous CfDs you feel applies. CfD is a discussion, not a vote. And...
Click to read more »the talk page advising that the rename could be re-opened by listing on CFD with the objection. Thoughts? Hiding talk 21:04, 29 August 2005 (UTC) I don't...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:19, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Comment as an admin who sometimes closes CFDs: the parent and sibling categories in this tree will not be deleted after...
Click to read more »per nom. --Just N. (talk) 19:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC) Speedy rename — WP:CFDS#C2A William Allen Simpson (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »sites that provide ratings and they are negative but also positive, a small CFD provider that is active mainly in African countries. 25 minutes later after...
Click to read more »categories were deleted should perhaps be recreated. Please link to any wp:CFD about the categories. [ I see that you did.] --Doncram (talk) 20:44, 29 March...
Click to read more »2021 (UTC) Support per wP:CFDS C2D, match parent article name. GiantSnowman 18:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC) Support per wP:CFDS C2D, clear rule following...
Click to read more »2009 coped after the mainspace version at Airline Mogul was deleted per CFD A7. Ricky81682 (talk) 09:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't look like...
Click to read more »friends call him "Dick-Dick". Comedy gold.) Notified creator with {{subst:cfd-notify}} Good Ol’factory (talk) 10:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC) Delete as overcat...
Click to read more »"male/female" or "men/women" - This has been discussed before in various CFDs. The decisions in the past has been to use the terminology that is actually...
Click to read more »film - per reasoning on several recent CFD nominations. In the alternative, close this and all similar recent CFDs and open a centralized discussion rather...
Click to read more »was misapplied in the previous CFDs, which erroneously assumed that it was a valid analogy. (Moreover, most of those CFDs were for "television personalities"...
Click to read more »contribs) 19:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Delete I'm pretty sure that similar CfDs closed as "delete" in the past. The potential for category clutter is just...
Click to read more »aid a story line. Trackinfo (talk) 05:03, 7 April 2018 (UTC) Relisted from CFD 2018 March 1 to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus...
Click to read more »depopulated by user:Bleaney out of process. A recent trial CfD for comprehensive schools at CFD April 15 was withdrawn; it was already gathering weight in...
Click to read more »to tidy up from the previous CFD Propose deleting Category:1820s establishments in Austria to tidy up from the previous CFD Propose deleting Category:1830s...
Click to read more »all levels within the hierarchy. As documented in the earliest of those CFDs, I ensured that each national Culture category was within the corresponding...
Click to read more »April 12 California lockdown IP address location Can a CFD be closed ASAP? Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Miscellaneous/2020 April...
Click to read more »at CFD shortly after. No reason to waste time discussing. --RL0919 (talk) 20:08, 13 April 2011 (UTC) Looks like it was an incorrectly formatted CfD that...
Click to read more »places. I was not on wikipedia during the period of the last CFD. The discussants in the CFD which deleted Category:Late 19th and 20th Century Revivals...
Click to read more »categorize people by name. This is an issue that has recently come up on WP:CFD with some frequency, and is erratically kept or deleted depending on who...
Click to read more »whose title has a particular characteristic (see, for example, the loanwords CFDs). For example, the article about the Trilby should be, and is, in Category:Hats...
Click to read more »Nominator's rationale: Delete. Nomination is based on the closure of this CFD. These are the remaining categories in the structure that's now largely dismantled...
Click to read more »the speedy rename was faulty then. If there was a CFD on the naming of the category, then the CFDS should never have gone through without a new discussion...
Click to read more »WP:RM to obtain consensus to move the parent article, and then simply use WP:CFDS to move these categories accordingly. GiantSnowman 14:31, 1 January 2020...
Click to read more »Anyone wishing to understand this issue in more depth should read through the CFDs that removed all the categorization of performers by their performances....
Click to read more »College or Mary Immaculate College). For info: This is one of a series of CFDs for similar categories (e.g. see Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log...
Click to read more »see copy of the CFDS discussion below. Marcocapelle (talk) 14:17, 20 June 2020 (UTC) Support - speedy often means 'like an ordinary cfd but slower'. Oculi...
Click to read more »you propose? Rathfelder (talk) 18:25, 4 May 2021 (UTC) Oppose all these CFDs of bishop categories lately has been downright problematic and confusing...
Click to read more »Please nominate categories for deletion separately from articles, at WP:CFD. (non-admin closure) feminist 13:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC) Category:Years in...
Click to read more »per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string> <string>clean up and re-categorisation per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string> <string>removing category per [[WP:CFD|CFD]]</string>...
Click to read more »get familiar with Wikipedia. If anyone is wondering how I am familiar with CFD, but not with the Category:Years of the 19th century in Poland, the best...
Click to read more »and the category has never had any other members. It is being discussed at CFD March 14 and is listed in Category:Popes by nationality, but it seems strange...
Click to read more »non-fiction environmental writers. The category renames should be listed at WP:CFD. —Darkwind (talk) 03:20, 7 June 2015 (UTC) List of non-American non-fiction...
Click to read more »think one could be written, and you think not. There have been quite a few cfds on similar topics (eg female models or was it male ones?) which tend to generate...
Click to read more »errors in Category names are routinely handled at WP:CFDS, rather than requiring a full-blown CFD. Cgingold (talk) 09:15, 28 November 2008 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »vrifiying the discussions. Preferably bots closing these should include the CFD link in their edit summary, and should only bet let loose on a category once...
Click to read more »durability, which suggests that the enthusiasm for deletion at the 2011 CFDs may not be widely shared. The current categories were mostly created in late...
Click to read more »per Sitcom and WP:C2C per Category:Sitcoms. This nomination was opposed at CFDS. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:23, 26 March 2020 (UTC) @Gonnym, Armbrust, and Catfurball:...
Click to read more »are a form of over-categorisation --- see a dozen or more similar recent CFDs (e.g. cyclists, speed skaters, triathletes, canoeists, cricketers, ice hockey...
Click to read more »Category:Moon in film Nominator's rationale: Opposed at CFDS because of this Cfd, the previous Cfd never really addressed the difference between this name...
Click to read more »rationale: The first seven categories were moved per, unfortunately unopposed, WP:CFD/S, though not falling in the scope of WP:C2C. Following earlier speedy moves...
Click to read more »• RM • SPost • SSP • UN • UTM • VP • WL AB AFD AIV AN AN3 ANI BL CFD CSD DRV HD MFD OP PER PP PRD PT RFA RFD RFP RFR RFU RM S...
Click to read more »of its tasks for only one page at a time. There's no magic trick for mass CFD listings, such as my recent nomination of 2 options for renaming each of...
Click to read more »page of Categories for Discussion that he thought there was "a problem at CfD". His posting was prompted by a number of deletion reviews regarding categories...
Click to read more »"People educated at..." because it's the term that's found favour in recent CFDs as the best compromise. As well as what others have said, it's a term that...
Click to read more »(UTC) Support proposal, which is in line with what we've done in previous CFDs for similar categories. Cgingold (talk) 00:13, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »thresholds, even if phrased as a "rule of thumb" or similar such phrase, in CFDs is therefore not supported by the guideline. However, reasonable editors...
Click to read more »18:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC) Support per nom. unsure why this wasn't at WP:CFDS though? GiantSnowman 18:03, 15 October 2021 (UTC) Rename all per nom. --15:05...
Click to read more »There's an obvious X of Y fix that I perhaps could have taken care of at WP:CFDS. But I also want to call attention that this is presently the only subcat...
Click to read more »procedural nomination, two different suggestions for renaming were offered at WP:CFDS, namely Category:Ushers of the Black Rod or Category:Black Rod, in either...
Click to read more »Molienet (talk · contribs) 2011-02-04: Expertise in CFD simulation in general but most recently in multiphase CFD involving particles Chogg (talk · contribs)...
Click to read more »DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 06:24, 25 April 2013 (UTC) Administrator note As noted in the CFD, the discussion has been heavily canvassed on Facebook and the press, so...
Click to read more »empty because you emptied it in clear violation of WP:CFD. You also did this with another CFD you did today....William, is the complaint department really...
Click to read more »need fixing, that falls outside of the scope of this CFD. In other words, both here and in the CFD that renamed this category people suggested fixing it...
Click to read more »I don't remember the specific CFD(s) but a one notabe person community in multiple counties survived CFD. Here's a CFD[2] where the nominator withdrew...
Click to read more »{{db-author}}, or if you want to delete someone else's category creation, go to WP:CFD. BencherliteTalk 13:48, 22 December 2011 (UTC) Category:Philately of British...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result of the debate was Speedy Keep WP:CFD, please. Computerjoe's talk 16:45, 29 May 2006 (UTC) Category used for vote-stacking...
Click to read more »this CfD were closed to reflect the consensus already demonstrated at the previous CfDs. Alansohn (talk) 01:52, 8 June 2008 (UTC) I agree that the CFD should...
Click to read more »provides a less arbitrary and less POV basis for grouping these. See also prior CFDs for deleting Category:Suburbs, renaming Category:Washington, D.C. suburbs...
Click to read more »could list it as a backlogged admin issue. (I note that there are even older CFDs that are not yet closed, however.) Good Ol’factory (talk) 02:48, 13 February...
Click to read more »Falconry), but I intend to CFD those categories separately after this CFD completes (it's a bit too complex for a single CFD discussion because the list...
Click to read more »and the categorization of people, and even the nominators in many of those CFDs suggested lists instead. I also think the degree to which there are inclusion...
Click to read more »The result of the discussion was: procedural close moving this back to WP:CFDS (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 20:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC) Propose...
Click to read more »"ecozone" was inserted by CFDS. Note: Any changes resulting from this CFD should also be made (e.g. by a subsequent CFD/CFDS) to other categories (e.g...
Click to read more »Category:United States case law by year. This is not being submitted as a WP:CFDS, specifically because there are articles in each category that do not need...
Click to read more »that I have this cat watchlisted, otherwise I would not have known of this CFD. --Redrose64 (talk) 09:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Delete -- The one article...
Click to read more »nomination was meant for Category:Free webcomics and should be listed on WP:CFD. –Abe Dashiell (t/c) 12:03, 14 June 2006 (UTC) Delete - This category doesn't...
Click to read more »of radio call signs could possibly be copyrightable.) Thirdly, it was a CFD discussion that listified this from a miscreated category in the first place...
Click to read more »is a speedy criterion to uphold it: WP:C2C. A large part of the busy WP:CFDS page is C2C renamings. (I have been doing this category thing intensively...
Click to read more »Uncontroversial category renames are handled at WP:CFD/S, but they often go to full discussion at WP:CFD. A merge is quite a bit different than a rename...
Click to read more »latest in a long history of incidents involving Alansohn's behavior at CFD and CFD-related DRV discussions. As a regular participant at these discussions...
Click to read more »created from a category (using my bot account) which had been listed on CFD. The consensus there was to listify the category. At the moment, the list...
Click to read more »following the change of the parent from "by nationality" to "by country" at CFD March 12. The contents are about countries rather than diasporas. Most of...
Click to read more »Summer Paralympics cat for speedy deletion as empty, but.. isn't that what CfD is for? — jwillbur 05:07, 4 August 2008 (UTC) It may seem more of an exercise...
Click to read more »discussion was procedural close. Category redirects are discussed at WP:CFD; apologies for not making the nominator aware of this previously. --BDD (talk)...
Click to read more »discussion, while this CFD has been going on, before and after I notified him of the CFD. I am concerned that I may not have started the CFD properly, like if...
Click to read more »potential renaming, please post the category for further discussion at WP:CFD. Note that many of the unproposed ones may need to be renamed/rescoped/reworded...
Click to read more »(T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:20, 14 August 2011 (UTC) Some WP:XFD processes, such as WP:CFD include discussions to rename and merge as on point. I thought for a WikiProject...
Click to read more »two editor conversation. Hopefully someone else might choose to join in. CFDs like this are useful if more then 2 try to sort things out JarrahTree 10:58...
Click to read more »AFD? Is it not a category? Take it to WP:CFD Grutness...wha? 02:41, 20 September 2005 (UTC) It's now on CFD. Uncle G 15:15, 20 September 2005 (UTC) Obvious...
Click to read more »second CfD overturned primarily due to a procedural mistake by the nominator, once after a CfD and again as a speedy on the basis of the prior CfD, which...
Click to read more »to this section. The result of the debate was Wrong forum - moved to WP:CFD Not necessary category. There is no categories for every federal state in...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:18, 11 March 2012 (UTC) Rename – the rationale, refined over many cfds, has become unanswerable. Oculi (talk) 00:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC) Very Strong...
Click to read more »(UTC) Empty. As per talk page, articles were recatted under Category:Hamas. Cfd notice added on July 4 by User:Alphax. --Kbdank71 15:10, 15 July 2005 (UTC)...
Click to read more »og/2014_April_18#Category:Moths_of_Metropolitan_France and other similar CFDs. DexDor (talk) 18:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC) Merge: Not defining. --Kkmurray (talk)...
Click to read more »discussion, while this CFD has been going on, before and after I notified him of the CFD. I am concerned that I may not have started the CFD properly, like if...
Click to read more »appropriate Rename Category:UK MPs 2005- to Category:UK MPs 2005-2010 (use WP:CFD for this) Create Category:UK MPs 2010- and update {{United Kingdom MPs by...
Click to read more »documentation of this and another similar templates to forestall future CFDs. jnestorius(talk) 20:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC) We are moving away from using...
Click to read more »an extended series of CFDs that was spread over a period of many months. Please see my remarks in the closely related May 3 CFD for Category:Americans...
Click to read more »07:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC) Irrelevant rule to cfd discussions as per comments in the other similar cfds today. Dugwiki 17:18, 15 February 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »outbreaks, but did not include any of the subcats. I deplore the use of WP:CFDS as a way of renaming subcats which could and should have been included in...
Click to read more »-BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 23:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC) Delete per nom and multiple similar CfDs of this nature. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:48, 18 April 2022 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »