These proposed biozones Seeley named were subdivided further by Robert Broom between 1906 and 1909.[7]Broom proposed the following biozones (from oldest to youngest):
The current stratigraphic range of the Tropidostoma Assemblage Zone was previously included within the Endothiodon beds ascribed by Broom. Decades later between the 1970s and early 1990s, Keyser and Smith [8][9][10][11] collaborated on several field trips into known outcrop areas in order to re-evaluate the fossilbiostratigraphy. After relevant fossiltaxa data had been collected, the biozone was renamed the Tropidostoma Assemblage Zone due to the discovery that Tropidostoma fossils were only found within the confines of a certain area.
Lithology
The Tropidostoma Assemblage Zone correlates with the lower Teekloof Formation, Adelaide Subgroup of the Beaufort Group. This biozone is considered to be early Late Permian in age. The rock composition of this biozone is dominated by mudstones and siltstones, ranging from greenish-grey, grey, and dark reddish brown in colour.[12] The mudstones and siltstones, measuring approximately 3 m thick in most outcrops and exposures, frequently contain calcareous or micritic nodule horizons and rhizocretions. Sheet-type single-storied channel sandstones are also found, the lower portion of the biozone often containing fining upward sequences. Calcium carbonateprecipitation crusts and gypsum “desert rose” crystals have been uncovered in the sandstone layers.[13][14]
The preserved rocks show that the depositional environment of this biozone was formed in a lacustrine and overbank environment, which flowed northwards in long, meandering rivers. This low energy environment is conducive for preferential deposition of finer sediment types which formed the mudstone and siltstone deposits. However, the climate was seasonally dry due to the presence of calcium carbonateprecipitation in the sandstones. Coarser clastic material was only deposited during seasonal floods. The meandering rivers flowed from a foreland basin that was being formed from the rising of the Gondwanide mountains in the south. The Gondwanides were the result of crustal uplift that had previously begun to take course due to tectonic activity. The pressure of the growing Gondwanides mountain chain caused the formation of the Karoo Basin where the deposits of the Tropidostoma Assemblage zone, and all other succeeding assemblage zone deposits, were deposited over tens of millions of years.[15][16]
Paleontology
Vertebratefossils of the Tropidostoma Assemblage Zone are predominantly found in the thick mudstone and siltstonesequences.[17]Fossils are often encrusted within the calcareous or micritic nodules. The biozone is characterized by the presence of Tropidostoma in association with Endothiodon. However, the occurrence of these taxa are fairly rare in this biozone and their presence is characterized together with the more numerous fossils of the dicynodontspeciesPristerodon and Diictodon. Diictodonfossils are particularly ubiquitous in this biozone with isolated skull and post-cranial material being most commonly found. In the lower deposits, complete fossil skeletons of Diictodon are more commonly found, often in pairs and curled up together.[18] These intriguing paired Diictodon fossils are invariably recovered from the bottom of helical burrow casts, which have been attributed to Diictodon. The helical burrows - a generally accepted feature of the Tropidostoma Assemblage Zone - are vertical, spiralling tubes measuring just under 1 m in length. The burrows are found infilled with either fine sandstone or siltstone with calcareous concretions. The burrows were likely infilled during single flood events, suddenly trapping and burying the Diictodon pairs inside alive.[19] This provides an explanation for the near perfect preservation of the Diictodon pairs found in the burrow casts.
^Rubidge, B. S. (ed.) 1995b. Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). South African Committee of Stratigraphy. Biostratigraphic Series 1. Pretoria, Council for Geoscience.
^Rubidge, Bruce S.; Day, Michael O.; Barbolini, Natasha; Hancox, P. John; Choiniere, Jonah N.; Bamford, Marion K.; Viglietti, Pia A.; McPhee, Blair W.; Jirah, Sifelani (2016), "Advances in Nonmarine Karoo Biostratigraphy: Significance for Understanding Basin Development", Origin and Evolution of the Cape Mountains and Karoo Basin, Regional Geology Reviews, Springer International Publishing, pp. 141–149, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40859-0_14, ISBN9783319408583
^Keyser, A.W. and Smith, R.M.H., 1978. Vertebrate biozonation of the Beaufort Group with special reference to the western Karoo Basin. Geological Survey, Department of Mineral And Energy Affairs, Republic of South Africa.
^Keyser, A.W., 1979. A review of the biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group in the Karoo Basin of South Africa. Geocongress, Geological Society of South Africa, 2, pp.13-31.
^Rubidge, B. S. (ed.) 1995b. Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). South African Committee of Stratigraphy. Biostratigraphic Series 1. Pretoria, Council for Geoscience.
^Viglietti, Pia A.; Smith, Roger M.H.; Angielczyk, Kenneth D.; Kammerer, Christian F.; Fröbisch, Jörg; Rubidge, Bruce S. (2016-01-01). "The Daptocephalus Assemblage Zone (Lopingian), South Africa: A proposed biostratigraphy based on a new compilation of stratigraphic ranges". Journal of African Earth Sciences. 113: 153–164. Bibcode:2016JAfES.113..153V. doi:10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2015.10.011. ISSN1464-343X.
^Rubidge, Bruce S.; Day, Michael O.; Barbolini, Natasha; Hancox, P. John; Choiniere, Jonah N.; Bamford, Marion K.; Viglietti, Pia A.; McPhee, Blair W.; Jirah, Sifelani (2016), "Advances in Nonmarine Karoo Biostratigraphy: Significance for Understanding Basin Development", Origin and Evolution of the Cape Mountains and Karoo Basin, Regional Geology Reviews, Springer International Publishing, pp. 141–149, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40859-0_14, ISBN9783319408583
^Rubidge, B. S. (ed.) 1995b. Biostratigraphy of the Beaufort Group (Karoo Supergroup). South African Committee of Stratigraphy. Biostratigraphic Series 1. Pretoria, Council for Geoscience.
^Sidor, Christian A.; Smith, Roger M. H. (2007-06-12). "A second burnetiamorph therapsid from the Permian Teekloof Formation of South Africa and its associated fauna". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 27 (2): 420–430. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2007)27[420:asbtft]2.0.co;2. ISSN0272-4634. S2CID86173425.
^Fröbisch, Jörg; Reisz, Robert R. (2008-09-12). "A new species ofEmydops(Synapsida, Anomodontia) and a discussion of dental variability and pathology in dicynodonts". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 28 (3): 770–787. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2008)28[770:ansoes]2.0.co;2. ISSN0272-4634. S2CID85594758.
^Kammerer, Christian F.; Angielczyk, Kenneth D.; Fröbisch, Jörg (2011-12-14). "A comprehensive taxonomic revision ofDicynodon(Therapsida, Anomodontia) and its implications for dicynodont phylogeny, biogeography, and biostratigraphy". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 31 (sup1): 1–158. Bibcode:2011JVPal..31S...1K. doi:10.1080/02724634.2011.627074. ISSN0272-4634. S2CID84987497.
^LAURIN, MICHEL; REISZ, ROBERT R. (1995-02-01). "A reevaluation of early amniote phylogeny". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 113 (2): 165–223. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1995.tb00932.x. ISSN0024-4082.
^Marsicano, Claudia A.; Latimer, Elizabeth; Rubidge, Bruce; Smith, Roger M.H. (2017-05-29). "The Rhinesuchidae and early history of the Stereospondyli (Amphibia: Temnospondyli) at the end of the Palaeozoic". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 181 (2). doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlw032. hdl:11336/105150. ISSN0024-4082.
^Smith, Roger M.H.; Botha-Brink, Jennifer (2011-12-01). "Morphology and composition of bone-bearing coprolites from the Late Permian Beaufort Group, Karoo Basin, South Africa". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 312 (1–2): 40–53. Bibcode:2011PPP...312...40S. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.09.006. ISSN0031-0182.