Template talk:Soy

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Food and drink This template is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Categorization

I'm not sure if these "analogue" categories are apt. Many non-vegetarians eat tofu as tofu, without considering it to be an inferior substitute for something else. It's also missing nattō, which doesn't appear to fit into any row. By the way, there appears to be quite a few articles listed at Fermented soy products. —Tokek (talk)

This link may be an answer.[1] --Appletrees (talk) 13:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. I disagree, however, with the editor because I don't see what the harm was in the convenience of linking to the individual soy products directly, before it was replaced with a link to a category of foods. The way the article fermented bean paste is worded and the way it is listed in the "See also" section of fermented soy products instead of the main list suggests that the category may not be a direct subcategory of soy products anyway. In fact, I have a new idea for a [[Category:...]] now.—Tokek (talk) 23:44, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

soy controversy

The "soy controversy" links leads nowhere.Whotookthatguy (talk) 04:47, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]