Template talk:Human geography

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Geography This template is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. WikiProject Geography To-do list: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles. Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes Map : See Wikipedia requested maps Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places Stubs : See Geography stubs

Untitled

The Pepsi picture is amusing but I fail to see its relevance to this template.-- _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk}  23:11, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Pepsi image is suppose to show one of two things. Firstly americanisation of the developing world and cultural imperialism and also the diachotomies of development that have arisen from globalisation. Ona personal note I also got fed up with people just sticking a map on the geography templates as that's a cliche of geography, so thought it would be nice to have something different and a picture that should the human side. AlexD 09:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blank lines at top of template

Hi — Shouldn't these appear in the code of the articles that need them, so they aren't forced to appear in articles that don't? Sardanaphalus 10:31, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's correct. I removed it. —Mr. Grim Reaper at 05:09, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Integrated geography

Should integrated geography be included in this template? If so, where? Should it be in a new group, e.g. 'Related...'? Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Have added this and the one below... Better way? Regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cognitive geography

Cognitive geography also would seem to fit here somewhere; not sure exactly where... Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:33, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]