Template talk:Eugenics sidebar

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Molecular Biology: Genetics This template is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of molecular biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. This template is supported by the Genetics task force. History of Science This template is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the template attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month. Sociology This template is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Evolutionary biology This template is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biology

Discussion at FTN

Because of the recent interest at FTN about the race concepts sidebar, I am mentioning this sidebar there. Llll5032 (talk) 20:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why not in more articles?

The people in the part of this sidebar called «Pre-war academic proponents» almost all have it in their article if you click on their names. Why is it not in the articles of those people under the heading «Post-war academic remnants»? I couldn't find any case where it was included. DBaiocchi78 (talk) 16:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I have not done so because I am busy and cannot spend all that time defending such edits that are likely to be reverted. These articles are all highly controversial and de facto battlegrounds. ChopinAficionado (talk) 18:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggesting new lead image

I originally intended to add one particular illustration.[1] It is arguably well-suited in that it is both (a) an actual poster from that period, (b) very clearly includes the invasive aspects of (especially early) eugenics in the form of no less than gigantic pincers cutting a vine. ChopinAficionado (talk) 18:35, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the illustration commonly used by reputable sources to be synonymous with eugenics? Llll5032 (talk) 19:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]