IMessage#Anti-SMS/MMS_user_sentiment, going on the news you can find tons of articles about this, from verified sources. Not a page but verifiable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8001:8400:dc34:c081:5d75:1d83:4ba (talk • contribs)
The most Discrimination based on skin tone made by society is made betwwe people of same ethnicity and race, in such cases of Africa, East Asia, Middle Age Europe, Victorian Era. Harry Cousins (talk) 19:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC).
@Rsk6400: Reliable sources do describe no kid zones as discrimination. I disagree with your removal here [1]. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:29, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
I've included our disagreement at WP:3O because templates are a relatively niche area and I'd prefer a third opinion. [4] Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 18:29, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
3O Response: Two reliable sources (CNN and Maeil Business Pulse) identify the Korean human rights authority's listing "No kid zone" as discriminative. Listing this article on the Discrimination template is not original research, as the topic is comparable to Ageism#Discrimination. See the second paragraph in that section describing results of children's responses to Children's Rights Alliance for England and the National Children's Bureau survey. Forms of discrimination need not be prohibited by law to qualify as discrimination. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 20:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Should the article Triple oppression be added to the template, if so where? Considering oppression is in it as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atakes Ris (talk • contribs) 03:05, 11 August 2024 (UTC)
If we're going by technical definition, Israeli is a nationality while Zionism is a political belief. One could argue that Israeli isn't a nationality as per Ornan v. Ministry of the Interior but even if that were the case, discrimination against any person living in Israel would still not necessarily be anti-Zionism. AmrAlWatan(🗣️|📝) 17:51, 20 September 2024 (UTC)
“Anti-israeli redirects to Anti-zionism.”
I think Anti-Zionism should be replaced by New Antisemitism in the template, maybe like Antisemitism (New), with New linking to the article. Kowal2701 (talk) 19:11, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Antisemitism (New)
|answered=
Need to change something Annoyingcomerade (talk) 20:44, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Here is 1 of many sources Rep. Nancy Mace's posts flagged for hateful conduct amid anti-transgender campaign Arbeiten8 (talk) 09:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
@Rsk6400 Is there some ulterior reason you have for removing some ethnicities from the template? In this edit you reverted my addition of Anti-French sentiment, but I notice that you have been removing a lot more than that for a while now, including British, German and Russian, etc. and your removals and the ongoing fight you’re taking on seem to have been ongoing since 2021 (Australian and Austrian).
Is there some standard of “discrimination” that we should be using here that is defined differently to the one used by these articles? Articles which often begin with wording like “Anti-Scottish sentiment is disdain, discrimination, or hatred for…” (another ethnicity you regard as facing no consequence of discrimination). I assume that, in your opinion, historical discrimination is not something we should link to from here?
“Anti-Scottish sentiment is disdain, discrimination, or hatred for…”
It’s possible there are better approaches though; the navbox is already exceedingly large, maybe we should simply split off the ethnic and nationalist discrimination section to another template? — HTGS (talk) 04:12, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Is there anyone else who agrees with Rsk6400 on this? — HTGS (talk) 09:12, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Discrimination is the process of making unfair or prejudicial distinctions between people based on the groups, classes, or other categories to which they belong or are perceived to belong, such as race, gender, age, religion, physical attractiveness or sexual orientation.
Anglo-Americans in the Pennsylvania Colony viewed the Palatines with suspicion and often derided their language, customs, and religious practices
making unfair or prejudicial distinctions between people …
@Rsk6400 I noticed you reverted my recent edit and left a passive-aggressive comment on my talk page. Is there a reason for this? I noticed you directed me to this page but the above conservation doesn’t show any consensus about applying your proposed “requirements” for what pages are allowed to be included, as if a page’s title being ‘anti-[ethnicity] sentiment’ doesn’t make it obvious the article is about discrimination.
Trying to say the page needs better sourcing like it’s being including in ITN is ridiculous, and reverting any edit against your agenda is in violation of WP:OWN; on the topic of rules, I don’t think calling Anti-German sentiment an article about discrimination is exactly violating WP:OR. This really should be taken to WP:RFC if you’re not willing to reach a settlement. —TwinBoo (talk) 20:20, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
@TwinBoo: You started a faulty RfC with a question that has nothing to do with the things we disagree about. So, stop edit warring ! Rsk6400 (talk) 07:48, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
@HTGS: I didn't answer to you at the RfC, because it is obviously faulty. Of course, all articles detailing discrimination to certain ethnic groups (from that RfC) should be included here. But whether a certain article is about discrimination or not has to be decided by the editors of that article, i.e. on the talk page of the respective article. And, of course, we as editors have to be guided by reliable sources. According to WP:NOTEVERYTHING (especially WP:NOTDB) I don't think that we should have our readers waste their time by scrolling through a heap of unrelated stuff. Rsk6400 (talk) 09:34, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
articles detailing discrimination to certain ethnic groups
Add Untermensch in the Manifestations section. 67.209.128.177 (talk) 01:18, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
There is an ongoing dispute about whether some articles detailing discrimination to certain ethnic groups (Anti-French sentiment, Anti-English sentiment, etc.) should be included in the template, the main argument against their inclusion being that sources should directly state whether the pages are about discrimination. Should these pages be included or not? —TwinBoo (talk) 17:10, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
dispute about whether some articles detailing discrimination
RfCs are time consuming, and editor time is valuable.
It's ludicrous that Anti-Zionism is on the list when Zionism isn't. The article on Anti-Zionism calls it 'a heterogenous phenomenon' and the suggestion it is discriminatory is at the very least highly contentious and perhaps even illogical. Who is being discriminated against here, particularly when there are many Jewish people who would consider themselves opposed to Zionism? To mention this as discrimination and not do the same for Zionism itself, when the violently discriminatory consequences of that particular ideology are there for all to see, is outrageous, and it harms the credibility of Wikipedia. Please remove Anti-Zionism from this list, as it is the most non-contentious way of resolving this. 2A02:8084:4F41:B700:9DE5:F143:938C:5C9 (talk) 12:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)