Talk:Tagalog language

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tagalog language article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 28 days

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

This article is written in Philippine English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, realize, center, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from (including jeepney and cyberlibel) other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

	Tagalog language was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 22, 2014 Good article nominee Not listed February 12, 2014 Peer review Not reviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Languages Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Tambayan Philippines Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 28 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 3.

Hello everybody I’m not really a wikipedia editor and i’m definitely not a tagalog speaker but the state of one of the categories here is so abysmal I actually felt the need to make a talk page post for the first time.

“ …but especially, more accurately and specifically, officially, sociolinguistically and linguistic politically as, through or in the form of Filipino.”

This goddamn phrase. It doesn’t really make sense in the first place and from what I understand it is simply just a very long winded way of saying “Tagalog is spoken in the form of Filipino” or maybe “Tagalog is officially classified as Filipino.” I don’t know if maybe I’m just dumb but I really feel as though that should be rewritten, at least to be clearer on the meaning.

Also, even if it does make perfect sense to everyone but me, there is no reason it should be used TWELVE times in this section. No phrase should be used that much in a short amount of time. Especially not that one.

Also also, let’s talk about the end of this section:

“Tagalog speakers are also found in other parts of the Philippines and especially, more accurately and specifically, officially, sociolinguistically and linguistic politically as and through its standardized, codified, national or nationalized, intellectualized, more linguistically inclusive, more linguistically dynamic, and expanded or broaden form of, as and through Filipino, and the language serves as the national lingua franca of the country, but especially or more accurately and specifically as and through Filipino.”

Genuinely what does this mean. There is no way you have to use all these words to say this.

Maybe I am overreacting because it’s kinda late and I don’t really understand Tagalog as a language but I can’t be the only one who thinks this is crazy. Please can someone with more background knowledge of the Tagalog language fix this phrasing ???? 2600:1702:3F80:A30:F007:28FF:AF17:8768 (talk) 03:49, 27 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hi everyone, I made this comment while logged out. I added a template to the Geography section in hopes that somebody more knowledgeable on the subject than I would be able to copyedit. Please feel free to move the template if I put it in the wrong spot; I've never placed a template before so I'm hoping I didn't do it incorrectly. Thank you!! :) Pippippop (talk) 20:01, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply