isnt the sufficient context provided in the article about computational complexity theory?
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
isnt the sufficient context provided in the article about computational complexity theory?
The claim
cannot be true, since combined with the claim
you get
which would be a major (and very shocking) breakthrough in complexity theory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.220.163 (talk) 00:14, 3 October 2009 (UTC)
This article should be updated to account for CLS = PPAD ∩ PLS https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.01929 Aviad.rubinstein (talk) 17:23, 2 December 2020 (UTC)
Could we remember some of the most basic parts of WP:MOS and WP:MOSMATH here:
2601:447:C601:3690:8015:B58:40FD:9495 (talk) 01:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.