Redirect to:
This subpage of the Manual of Style contains guidelines for writing and editing clear, encyclopedic, attractive, and interesting articles on mathematics...
Click to read more »it to other internet forums, since it continued to be suggested at WP:MOSMATH for years after it was no longer needed. When LaTeX is used in the normal...
Click to read more »consistency with the rest of Wikipedia, other manuals of style (in particular WP:MOSMATH for mathematics and WP:MOSCHEM for chemistry) apply when possible. Exceptions...
Click to read more »idea to spell it out anyway so people can understand the article (see WP:MOSMATH). I would not recommend mixing pseudocode and LaTeX in Wikipedia, the fonts...
Click to read more »(non-admin closure) UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:43, 29 December 2018 (UTC) MOSMATH → Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Mathematics (talk · links · history ·...
Click to read more »revert, both from today by the same editor attempting to assert that the MOSMATH guideline is in conflict with ACCESS. Concretely, what seems to be proposed...
Click to read more »As a results, the article is a terminological pastiche, contravening WP:MOSMATH. 5) Disorganized presentation and tangentiality. Before and after giving...
Click to read more »comments? Thanks, ManishEarthTalk • Stalk 11:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC) WP:MOSMATH and Help:Math deals with that. I would be against extensively changing...
Click to read more »responsible for the "imagine". :-) In any case, WP:MOSMATH is ok with limited usage of this type. If MOSMATH is inconsistent with FA, that's a shame. Feel...
Click to read more »15:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Delete Firstly, WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. Secondly, WP:MOSMATH says "include proofs when they expose or illuminate the concept or idea;...
Click to read more »Comment Everyone can see that it's a clumsily written article, neglecting WP:MOSMATH at every opportunity (not to mention all the incorrectly capitalized initial...
Click to read more »be written by mathies for mathies and unfortunately (and contrary to WP:MOSMATH) that sometimes includes articles that should be (at least partly) understandable...
Click to read more »plural forms; User:Declan Davis has made the point repeatedly in our WT:MOSMATH discussion that the plural of "basis" is "bases", not "basises", and no...
Click to read more »Comment Everyone can see that it's a clumsily written article, neglecting WP:MOSMATH at every opportunity (not to mention all the incorrectly capitalized initial...
Click to read more »material science (if those exist). The only other project MOS I'm aware of is MOSMATH. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 02:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC) Ah, OK. hamiltonstone...
Click to read more »packages to produce TeX. Although, I find it somewhat strange that an WP:MOSMATH-compliant TeX software package hasn't been created (or has it?). Anyways...
Click to read more »more accessible at WP:TECHNICAL. WP:LEAD also has a bit about it and WP:MOSMATH some specifically about maths. Dmcq (talk) 13:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC) We...
Click to read more »15:14, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Delete Firstly, WP:NOTTEXTBOOK. Secondly, WP:MOSMATH says "include proofs when they expose or illuminate the concept or idea;...
Click to read more »markup?Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 15:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC) Does WP:MOSMATH help? – ukexpat (talk) 15:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC) For the markup, see...
Click to read more »As a results, the article is a terminological pastiche, contravening WP:MOSMATH. 5) Disorganized presentation and tangentiality. Before and after giving...
Click to read more »responsible for the "imagine". :-) In any case, WP:MOSMATH is ok with limited usage of this type. If MOSMATH is inconsistent with FA, that's a shame. Feel...
Click to read more »material science (if those exist). The only other project MOS I'm aware of is MOSMATH. Seppi333 (Insert 2¢) 02:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC) Ah, OK. hamiltonstone...
Click to read more »MOS:MATHS (links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Mathematics (exists?) No 534 MOSMATH (links) Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Mathematics (exists?) No 535 MOS:MED...
Click to read more »