Talk:Mumbai

Talk:Mumbai
Former featured articleMumbai is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Good articleMumbai has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 9, 2005.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 10, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
March 23, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
May 27, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
July 8, 2009Good article nomineeListed
July 22, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
August 29, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 15, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
July 24, 2020Peer reviewReviewed
January 3, 2026Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Former featured article, current good article

GA Reassessment

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Issues appear to have been resolved. Bgsu98 (Talk) 13:45, 3 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs.
Fixed.
The article is over 10,700 words long. After skimming the article, I noticed lots of places where information can be removed or moved to a spun out article. This included outdated information that has been updated (2008 demographic information), information about the city's history, and the "Culture" section.
Trimmed 32kBytes from the text, down to 9k words. Removed a lot of old stuff, especially where there are "main" links.
There are several references with "cite errors". These should be resovled.
Merged duplicate refs.
"Catherine of Bragança (1638–1705)". claims it is from the BBC, but the link does not go to a BBC website.
Fixed.
Sportskeeda is not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia and should be removed. Z1720 (talk) 03:01, 16 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Done.
I'll take a look. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Keep, it's a lot tighter now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:56, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Semi-protected edit request on 7 March 2026

I noticed that the section discussing the city’s local transportation briefly mentioned the suburban railway but did not clearly explain how central it is to daily life in Mumbai. Add a short sentence explaining that the Mumbai Suburban Railway is one of the busiest commuter rail systems in the world and that it serves millions of passengers every day. Komal.manisha (talk) 00:26, 7 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScrubbedFalcon (talk) 08:47, 7 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Edit request 24 March 2026: "a(n) alpha world city"

Hello -- in the first paragraph of the article, the phrase "a alpha world city" appears. I believe it should be "an alpha world city."

P.S. This is my first edit request on a protected article! Is there a standard form for the subject line for these? StrangeAsterism (talk) 20:30, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done. Thanks. What you posted was fine. The best way, especially for small edits is to mention where it is (as you did), and then use the {{textdiff}} template. See the example at WP:MAKINGEREQ. Welcome to Wikipedia and happy editing! meamemg (talk) 21:23, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Noted and thank you! StrangeAsterism (talk) 21:34, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Question regarding name origins of "Bombaim" and Discrepancies between English and Portuguese versions of this page [minor edit request]

Under Etymology section, it says Duarte Barbosa in 1516 used “Tana-Maiambu” and that “Maiambu” referred to Mumbadevi Temple / Mumbadevi, citing Shirodkar 1998, p. 2. The Portuguese version of this same article, citing Cunha 1900, p. 43, instead says Duarte Barbosa used “Benamajambu” (Transliteration:Tana-Maiambu) and argues that “majambu” (maiambu) referred to Mahim, not to Mumbadevi. (Alguns autores pretendem que majambu poderá ser uma alusão a Mumbadevi. No entanto, enquanto que Bena refere-se provavelmente a Tana, majambu parece referir-se somente à ilha vizinha de Mahim, ambos os locais atualmente subúrbios de Bombaim). This is a different interpretation based on the sources used, but it matters for the neutrality of this article, therefore I suggest adding it in. After citation [47], add the line "However, other scholars argue that “maiambu” appears to refer instead to the neighboring island of Mahim, which is now a suburb of Mumbai." with the citation "Cunha, Joseph G. (1900), Origin of Bombay".

Secondly, the following info needs to be checked: Citation 47[b] has a note that says :"Portuguese linguist José Pedro Machado attributes that interpretation to a deficient knowledge of the Portuguese language, mixing up the Portuguese word "bom" with the English "bay", from the English version of the name." It is the word "bahia" (today spelt "baía") that means bay, while "bom" means good, so it would be hard to see the confusion there. Hence this note requires verification. I suggest changing "Portuguese word "bom"" to "Portuguese word "baia"". Alternatively, this note should be rewritten as it is also unclear whether the initial editor meant to write "mixing up" or joining the two words/syllables together. Thanks. Aren Noronha (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 28 July 2026

Inaccurate wording.

Change the image text "The Mumba Devi Temple, from whom the city of Mumbai may derive its name." To "The Mumba Devi Temple, named after the goddess Mumba Devi, from whom the city may derive its name." Håkon L. Aunet (talk) 08:44, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done Fair point, fixed. DrOrinScrivello (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.