Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Most leads of featured articles are 250–400 words. Shortcuts WP:SPINOUTWP:SPINOUT WP:SUBARTICLEWP:SUBARTICLE Very large articles should be split into logically...
Click to read more »not be used unilaterally, by a single editor in silence, to draft a WP:Spinout of a subtopic of an existing topic covered by an article. The usual problem...
Click to read more »Guide to deletion (glossary) Help, my article got nominated for deletion! Spinout (video game) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch |...
Click to read more »creation of a spinout article, as this may remove the need to create this spinout article. Further details on writing and creating spinout articles can...
Click to read more »series and this is a WP:SPINOUT of that article. Satellizer (´ ・ ω ・ `) 11:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC) Keep Appropriate spinout of long-running game series...
Click to read more »reliable. DJ Autagirl (talk) 21:49, 4 September 2015 (UTC) Keep as a valid WP:SPINOUT of the main game series article, split off to keep the main article of...
Click to read more »that such spinouts may depend on the parent for their notability. Per guideline, it need not be forced to show it seperately. The spinout passes WP:V...
Click to read more »20 March 2016 (UTC) This article was created as a spinout of an existing article, as per WP:SPINOUT, and therefore it was created by relocating existing...
Click to read more »notable pageant. Ajf773 (talk) 09:27, 23 April 2018 (UTC) Keep. This is a WP:SPINOUT of Miss Exotic World Pageant, which has also been nominated for deletion...
Click to read more »as this is a WP:SPINOUT of a larger topic. A certain amount of duplicated material (I only see one sentence) is required in a spinout. That leaves the...
Click to read more »discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 04:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC) Keep, per WP:SPINOUT. If there is concern that the Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants...
Click to read more »the Dragon. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 12:08, 5 September 2015 (UTC) Keep Appropriate spinout for a vg series, and actually for a list of characters manages to avoid...
Click to read more »article, which is why it was moved to this spinout article in the first place. Concerned editors can watch this spinout article just as easily as the main article...
Click to read more »lots of yearly spinouts of Balkan Basketball Championship, and that the spinouts have no secondary source content, and fail WP:SPINOUT. They should be...
Click to read more »this page. The result was keep. Consensus is that the article is a valid spinout. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »(talk) 20:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC) Keep, it's an acceptable spinout article per WP:FICT, WP:SPINOUT, WP:SUMMARY, and WP:Article series. --Pixelface (talk)...
Click to read more »article doesn't seem to be notable, but there is a split on whether WP:SPINOUT requires notability. It'd be better to have that discussion on WT:Article...
Click to read more »--BelovedFreak 02:23, 18 July 2008 (UTC) Phish#Music is a WP:SUMMARY of this WP:SPINOUT article. That is the reason for the redundancy, which is entirely appropriate...
Click to read more »Mosquito#Bites, and discuss at Talk:Mosquito#Bites if a WP:SPINOUT is suggested. Do not draft spinouts all by yourself in silence. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:55...
Click to read more »deletion when severe. Keep arguments cited it seems an acceptable spinout (WP:SPINOUT) and basically what amount of arguments over accessibility and content...
Click to read more »existing spinout articles. The spinout article should concisely provide details of the topic or topics covered in the work – just because the spinout article...
Click to read more »in mainspace, improve the mainspace article. WP:Spinout from mainspace, do not draft orphan spinouts. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:28, 27 January 2018 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnecessary spinout article. Besides being poorly sourced and full of trivial information,...
Click to read more »others, were collectively splitoff from parent article but does not meet WP:SPINOUT requirements. DA1 (talk) 10:41, 19 July 2019 (UTC) The main article in...
Click to read more »to Homotopy theory. Too thin, in unjustified WP:SPINOUT. Get talk page consensus before making spinouts. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:40, 27 September 2019 (UTC)...
Click to read more »recommended size for spinouts to occur. North America1000 06:22, 15 June 2017 (UTC) Keep, ordinarily I'd think this cruft, but it's a useful spinout from News International...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete created as a spinout of University of Maryland, Baltimore County Student Organizations, which is itself a spinout of University of Maryland...
Click to read more »effort to keep this list vaguely under control. It's also not a valid WP:SPINOUT from comic book death because, in that sense, it's largely indiscriminate...
Click to read more »instead improve Jonesboro, Arkansas, and if a list WP:spinout is needed, let it happen by the normal spinout process. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Ordinarily I'd say this is a spinout that doesn't need to exist, but this one is one of the very rare occasions where the spinout is less crufty (though still...
Click to read more »heard it argued that spinouts must be on topics that show notability in their own right. But it can never be the case that a spinout can be deleted for...
Click to read more »18:19, 17 July 2020 (UTC) Delete as per nom. Not a properly done spinout, and if a spinout were to be done, cut down the content in the original. Besides...
Click to read more »an article about the chart, and maybe a spinout for its number ones, but there’s no way it needs two spinout articles about “achievements”, let alone...
Click to read more »about it, the main article actually has been divided, with an encyclopedic spinout for List of Initial D episodes. There's no value to spinning that out with...
Click to read more »Perhaps, I'm just saying that despite the parent article's size, the WP:SPINOUT guidelines caution against ad-hoc forks. This looks like the posterchild...
Click to read more »to a new section at Talk:Anti-Serb sentiment. Spinout articles, especially possibly WP:NPOV issue spinout articles, should begin from the main article...
Click to read more »too-narrow unjustified spinout. Draftspace should not be used for WP:spinouts without consensus on the article talkpage. This spinout is WP:UNDUE. —SmokeyJoe...
Click to read more »to justify a WP:SPINOUT. -- œ™ 17:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC) Keep per OlEnglish. There are certainly enough material to apply WP:SPINOUT. Armbrust, B.Ed...
Click to read more »good faith yet unnecessary article spinout. If the content can't be merged into The Sims 3 then perhaps a spinout article covering all the expansions...
Click to read more »The result was keep. Consensus appears to be that this is a legitimate spinout article. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 TT me 17:10, 2 April 2016 (UTC) List...
Click to read more »(talk) 21:01, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Keep A character list is a legitimate spinout article to keep the main series article from growing too large. This article...
Click to read more »WP:FICT does apply, WP:SPINOUT seems a stretch without better explanation of why character is important or significant enough to spinout. Sheer bulk of writing...
Click to read more »16:47, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Merge to Mass Effect (series) for now, with a spinout later. A quick reliable sources search reveals coverage from a plethora...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unnecessary article spinout. A page full of WP:INUNIVERSE info that does not attempt to establish any...
Click to read more »(UTC) Merge to List of Boardwalk Empire characters as this and a few other spinout character articles from the show are mainly in-universe sourced and are...
Click to read more »13 January 2018 (UTC) Keep WP:SPINOUT articles are not a function of notability. If someone objects to the spinout, the remedy is to unspin the article...
Click to read more »justify a WP:SPINOUT of the former guitarist from this band. He does not independently pass WP:BIO. Should anyone seek to do a spinout of members from...
Click to read more »article is approaching SIZE, it is completely reasonable to consider this a spinout of the main article to cover home media. (And I'm pretty confident that...
Click to read more »television drama series whose main article isn't long enough to require the spinout in the first place and on which being a guest star isn't really notable...
Click to read more »22:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC) Delete - While character lists can be valid spinouts of articles, they actually need to be comprised of sourced information...
Click to read more »It is a typical spinout article. Spinout articles are covered by Wikipedia:Summary style and Wikipedia:Content forking#Article spinouts - "Summary style"...
Click to read more »section; that has its own article, so trim it instead." I should have said "spinout article" where I said "fork", because my prod tag was removed. Some background;...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was keep as a valid WP:SPINOUT. ansh666 08:31, 18 July 2018 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles for...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC) Keep per WP:ITSCRUFT. Perfectly valid spinout. I'm curious as to why this episode list, out probably hundreds, was chosen...
Click to read more »appropriate spinout, and should be Redirected back to the main article. Rorshacma (talk) 15:54, 7 August 2022 (UTC) Redirect as this is not a valid spinout, as...
Click to read more »Redirect to Encanto#Voice cast - As of now, this is just an unnecessary spinout of the main article. If there ever comes a time when a separate character...
Click to read more »creating endless non-notable spinouts. If you have a well sourced section that isn't just a collection of primary data, a spinout will naturally meet the WP:GNG...
Click to read more »usually spinouts from the original articles, but all the character information here could be summarised in those main articles, making a spinout for size...
Click to read more »TTN (talk) 18:49, 22 September 2009 (UTC) Keep This looks like a proper spinout article that would overwhelm either the immediate parent article on the...
Click to read more »Starship development history is too large and a WP:SPINOUT is desired, use the talk page, and note that spinouts mean spinning out a large section, not a small...
Click to read more »the current article in the redirect page, and is available if and when a spinout to a standalone article is justified. i will note that the current article...
Click to read more »deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:49, 25 May 2012 (UTC) Keep as spinout of Rees's Cyclopædia with rename like List of Rees's Cyclopædia articles...
Click to read more »== 1 == Spider_Forest (talk) Spies_Like_Us (talk) Spinout (talk) Spirit:_Stallion_of_the_Cimarron (talk) Spirited_Away (talk) Spiritual_Kung_Fu (talk)...
Click to read more »future. Bearian (talk) 08:11, 24 August 2025 (UTC) Keep as a viable WP:SPINOUT. Are we seriously arguing here that the distribution of home entertainment...
Click to read more »Clarityfiend (talk) 01:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Keep - this is a legitimate WP:SPINOUT of Silverstone Circuit; this is not "stats" but rather tables of winners...
Click to read more »South Indian International Movie Awards and not just one of its legitimate spinout articles. First the head, then the body. Cavarrone 06:38, 23 June 2013...
Click to read more »merge/redirect Plenty of mentions [1]. Should likely be in the KDE article or some spinout that covers the various similar tools. Hobit (talk) 02:52, 24 October 2008...
Click to read more »09:30, 23 June 2012 (UTC) Keep per Northamerica1000... a reasonable spinout-article that avoid idle repetitions about characters-features in all the...
Click to read more »Jewish view of Jesus but instead legitimate article spinout (see Wikipedia:Content forking#Article spinouts - "Summary style" articles). --LambiamTalk 01:51...
Click to read more »reserve itself. It is simply a spinout - see WP:SPINOUT - from Upper Rock Nature Reserve. There are already multiple spinouts from that article covering the...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Citing WP:SPINOUT, For non-mainspace articles, consider splitting and transcluding into the...
Click to read more »would be useful and notable? According to WP:WAF: Very rarely should such spinout articles be about a singular topic (e.g., character, plot item); either...
Click to read more »consensus of participants argued this article qualifies as a policy-compliant spinout. j⚛e deckertalk 03:31, 5 July 2012 (UTC) List of converts to Christianity...
Click to read more »merged into the main article; however I don't believe this is a valid spinout and should be deleted. The remaining articles can be viewed by going to...
Click to read more »Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 01:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC) Keep appropriate spinout article, as for the history of everywhere else. Many of the sections seem...
Click to read more »Consider summarizing some sections, removing unnecessary information, or WP:SPINOUT sections of the article. Normally, I would recommend an FA article to serve...
Click to read more »deletion of content which breaks WP:NOTSTATS and WP:NOTMIRROR, this is a WP:SPINOUT of content which would be fully valid on the otherwise very long Adelaide...
Click to read more »requirement on spinouts. It is not that notability in inherited to spinouts, however; except in the case of certain data table spinouts, we do expect that...
Click to read more »should be made to this page. The result was Delete. Consensus is that spinout was not appropriate for this content fork. Jreferee t/c 00:44, 28 September...
Click to read more »definitely established.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC) Keep per WP:SPINOUT and the fact that a number of characters are notable. ex Ash Ketchum, Brock...
Click to read more »majorly notable, and that a list of characters is by consensus a valid spinout for articles about works of fiction when they get too long. —Quasirandom...
Click to read more »be merged into the main article or existing spinout articles." And this is a case of an unnecessary spinout article. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:18, 2 November...
Click to read more »not as a character list. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) Comment I understand the spinout element of this article but the fact it's to do with an article being overlong...
Click to read more »that consensus upheld here. Regardless, I do hope the circumstances of a spinout having been proposed and rejected and a new article created anyway will...
Click to read more »Gleeanon409 (talk) 12:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC) Keep: This is an appropriate spinout from the RuPaul's Drag Race article, which is mostly about the individual...
Click to read more »new article is sometimes called a "spinoff" or "spinout" of the main article. For fiction, such spinout articles are typically about characters or other...
Click to read more »need for deletion just because the page is horribly written, it's a valid spinout article as with any other list of characters for a work of fiction with...
Click to read more »usually better to expand an existing topic until it's ready to become a spinout page, than to create a dubious stub. Data clearly shows pages created by...
Click to read more »active AfDs on the topic, fails WP:NOTPLOT. This is not justified as a spinout when summary style writing can easily condense it into the most important...
Click to read more »spin-off articles must very rarely be created. "Very rarely should such spinout articles be about a singular topic (e.g., character, plot item); either...
Click to read more »candidate for a spinout. Apparently the faculty is the largest academic institute of its kind in Poland [1]. Wikipedia also has other faculty spinout pages of...
Click to read more »over 13,000 words, WP:TOOBIG recommends that the article be trimmed or WP:SPINOUT. There are also uncited sentences in the article, and new information has...
Click to read more »characters, but not because for lack of notability, but lack of reason for a spinout at this time. Nearly everything in the article is just plot summary, original...
Click to read more »the Restless characters. No content to support a separate article per WP:SPINOUT. – sgeureka t•c 13:15, 11 October 2008 (UTC) Redirect per all above. JohnCD...
Click to read more »aren't sufficient sources to support a spinout from the main article, the answer isn't to create a non-notable spinout, but to clean-up the section at the...
Click to read more »differences) to treat the new content as a separate game. Avoid creating spinout articles that are short or redundant. Any distinct features of a derivative...
Click to read more »(never-ending) list of critics was in the XML main article. It is not a fork but a spinout because I removed the content in the main article to create this one (and...
Click to read more »the redirect. I prefer to see it redirected and merged until ready for a spinout page. Legacypac (talk) 04:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC) Delete/Redirect to...
Click to read more »13,000 words: WP:TOOBIG says that it should probably be trimmed and WP:SPINOUT. There's also some sections that are very long: if after the trim they...
Click to read more »WP:SPINOUT the list of games into its own article, and only include the most notable games on the company article. Please ping me when this spinout is...
Click to read more »begin already meeting WP:STUB within 10 minutes) DraftSpace UserSpace (spinout drafting that sometimes occurs on mainspace talk subpages is superseded...
Click to read more »This is a proposal for resolving disputes on WP:BLP’s regarding WP:SPINOUT where a subsection of the article has become too long, would become too long...
Click to read more »Delete Topic sufficiently covered in main article. This is a non-notable spinout, and we should WP:AVOIDSPLIT here. Fails the WP:GNG and WP:VGSCOPE guidelines...
Click to read more »April 2009 (UTC) Merge and redirect per above. Not notable enough for a spinout. ThemFromSpace 07:54, 22 April 2009 (UTC) Merge and redirect: Agree with...
Click to read more »-- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:28, 28 March 2008 (UTC) Merge into section (or spinout) on characters in Quantum Leap as per WP:FICTION. No individual, real world...
Click to read more »Manchester/Captain Man. Demand target talk page consensus for a spinout before drafting a spinout. Spinouts from lists are dubious. The draft four references are...
Click to read more »creative works. This is a spinout article, which is pretty common (Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Writing_about_fiction#Spinout_articles). The idea is if there's...
Click to read more »Deutschland and the Stuttgart station. There is no reason to create a WP:SPINOUT before creating the main article. Dom from Paris (talk) 15:56, 6 August...
Click to read more »characters, but not because for lack of notability, but lack of reason for a spinout at this time. Nearly everything in the article is just plot summary, original...
Click to read more »nom. WP:NEXIST covers rationale for the references issues. Also per WP:SPINOUT. BabbaQ (talk) 10:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC) I want to also point the closing...
Click to read more »Washington Mutual article, making this also speediable as an illegitmate spinout. Just giving it a neutral code name doesn't make it much better than a...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Appears to be an attempt to WP:SPINOUT from Magnetization#Demagnetization, but ended up abandoned without any...
Click to read more »Magioladitis (talk) 23:17, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Looks like a fairly typical spinout list for a fairly large multimedia franchise. For verification, the external...
Click to read more »submission declined on 3 May 2013 and unlikely to ever meet WP:N or be a spinout of Peter Pakeman. -- Jreferee (talk) 16:16, 5 October 2013 (UTC) Comment...
Click to read more »and the absence of mention in his article means that writing this WP:Spinout is premature. Also not that new editors should get experience editing existing...
Click to read more »discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 18 September 2014 (UTC) Keep per WP:SPINOUT. Character lists are normally kept as an expansion of the plot not able...
Click to read more »Lucchese article, which is already a massive 137K, see WP:SPLIT and WP:SPINOUT. Anarchangel (talk) 21:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC) Well, it seems like a couple...
Click to read more »perspectives on Jesus and Jesus and history. There was no reason to create this spinout article, and no prior discussion. Furthermore, it is extremely POV. Every...
Click to read more »community. Not a very active user (talk) 08:05, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Delete spinout non-notable article which is just WP:GAMECRUFT. Fails WP:GNG. Spy-cicle💥 ...
Click to read more »fictional minutia that fails to establish notability and does not justify a spinout article. TTN (talk) 12:44, 15 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »independently notable, this seems to me to be a textbook application of WP:SPINOUT, removing detail on subtopics into separate articles. TJRC (talk) 22:05...
Click to read more »characters, but not because for lack of notability, but lack of reason for a spinout at this time. Nearly everything in the article is just plot summary, original...
Click to read more »this. CastJared (talk) 07:29, 9 March 2023 (UTC) Keep this legitimate WP:SPINOUT. See also KatoKungLee who worded the same opinion in greater depth. gidonb...
Click to read more »RebeccaGreen (talk) 13:20, 17 December 2019 (UTC) WP:NOT#PLOT and WP:SPINOUT have existed for way longer than 2012. Per WP:WAF and MOS:TV, the logical...
Click to read more »WP:GNG and it just an updated version the game NASCAR '15 so an unnecessary spinout article. The1337gamer (talk) 08:58, 18 October 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »list. --Altenmann >talk 00:11, 26 August 2025 (UTC) Keep as a valid WP:SPINOUT per the WP:CONSENSUS argument at the first AFD.4meter4 (talk) 01:42, 26...
Click to read more »04:23, 24 January 2012 (UTC) Redirect to above list. No indication that a spinout is necessary here. RadioFan (talk) 22:28, 24 January 2012 (UTC) UPDATE:...
Click to read more »recreating if size considerations of the main Qilin article ask for a spinout. This is, in fact, no different than a keep close, with a consensus to...
Click to read more »encourages spinout articles when appropriate. WP:NOR/WP:OR are reasons to clean up, not to delete. We are left with WP:N and the issue of spinout articles...
Click to read more »Court Exhibition Centre - the main article isn't big enough to require a spinout article at this point. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:03, 23 December 2013...
Click to read more »3-Methyl-1-pentanol 4-Methyl-1-pentanol History of the National Football League (spinout from (National Football League) It's Tough Being a Man Tora-San's Cherished...
Click to read more »Dream Focus 08:26, 11 June 2014 (UTC) Merge into HeroCraft - Unecessary spinout. Mention notable games in the company's article. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 21:44...
Click to read more »the main article and the volume of content does not seem to warrant a spinout page. jp×g 06:59, 13 December 2022 (UTC) Comment re "Deprodded without...
Click to read more »encourage the creating author to improve the content there to cause a WP:SPINOUT article. @Stifle: Would you be willing to withdraw this MFD in favor of...
Click to read more »at an article [[XYZ]], then it is also inadmissible at a spinout [[Criticism of XYZ]]. Spinouts are intended to improve readability and navigation, not...
Click to read more »discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:36, 14 April 2008 (UTC) Delete - this is a spinout of Magic: The Gathering rules, an article that shouldn't exist either....
Click to read more »subject has no WP:GNG problem. There just isn't any justification for a spinout or spinoff at present and this one is near total rehashing. gidonb (talk)...
Click to read more »existed) would be a suitable place to develop material before a possible spinout article. Legacypac (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2019 (UTC) Delete Clear UPE. I've...
Click to read more »a WP:POVFORK or if it merely is a legit article spinout. I would be inclined to say a legit spinout. As the article lede goes: "Falun Gong has received...
Click to read more »found this, which mentions campus activity, and this trivial mention. WP:SPINOUTs of offshoot organisations are definitely permitted, especially since the...
Click to read more »June 2025 (UTC) Delete - per nom, and since this is not a valuable WP:SPINOUT to have so there's no reason to keep the redirect. Psychastes (talk) 07:46...
Click to read more »things. Not a very active user (talk) 08:22, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Delete spinout non-notable article which is just WP:GAMECRUFT. Fails WP:GNG. Spy-cicle💥 ...
Click to read more »lists of every item that is verifiably a member of the group. (5) Per WP:SPINOUT, splitting a large article into logically distinct sub-articles is encouraged...
Click to read more »non-notable, in-universe material that fails WP:FICT and is unneeded per WP:SPINOUT. Eusebeus (talk) 13:52, 10 May 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. List of non-notable...
Click to read more »better way than the article under consideration has grown) then it could WP:SPINOUT again. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 23:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC) Relisted to...
Click to read more »-- TexasAndroid (talk) 03:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Delete. Needless fork/spinout of Saint Mary's University (Halifax). Hardly even locally notable. Hairhorn...
Click to read more »that should be placed on the spinout article's talk page when {{Main}} is used on an article to add a link to a spinout article {{Sync}} a template placed...
Click to read more »October 2010 (UTC) Redirect per Sarek, with no prejudice against allowing spinout again if and when multiple independent RS reference this fictional element...
Click to read more »Those too minor can just be left out. This list is not justified as a spinout. TTN (talk) 12:54, 27 January 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »Clarityfiend (talk) 01:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC) Keep - this is a legitimate WP:SPINOUT of Brands Hatch; this is not "stats" but rather tables of winners at the...
Click to read more »article, for that matter), so there is absolutely no need for a plot-only WP:SPINOUT either. – sgeureka t•c 08:29, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Delete Material is better...
Click to read more »friends. That's a good place to grow the list until it's suitable for spinout. In the meantime, can't verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:16,...
Click to read more »active AfDs on the topic, fails WP:NOTPLOT. This is not justified as a spinout when summary style writing can easily condense it into the most important...
Click to read more »policy.Onel5969 TT me 21:22, 16 July 2025 (UTC) Keep Can exist per WP:SPINOUT. Details of the events during the games are too long to be mentioned in...
Click to read more »said[citation needed] that all languages of Wikipedia deserve an article as a spinout, but the precedent trumps that. Nyttend (talk) 14:41, 2 October 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »result was merge to Applied linguistics without prejudice against a future spinout, once content and sourcing support this. Owen× ☎ 15:39, 26 June 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is an unnecessary WP:SPINOUT. The subject’s personality and political views are already covered in Marilyn...
Click to read more »proper article. Bloated with trivial content, which doesn't necessitate a spinout yet. – sgeureka t•c 18:19, 24 September 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »ing_Indian_films#Highest_grossing_Tamil_films and possibly argue for a spinout from there. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC) Delete per SmokeyJoe...
Click to read more »they are, and given the length of the page this might well be a valid WP:SPINOUT of Ultra Monsters. While the list in its current state is indeed deplorably...
Click to read more »sources. Not a very active user (talk) 09:09, 5 November 2019 (UTC) Delete spinout non-notable article which is just WP:GAMECRUFT. Fails WP:GNG. Spy-cicle💥 ...
Click to read more »Keep While the article certainly needs improvement, it is a legitimate spinout from the main article to keep it from growing too long. Edward321 (talk)...
Click to read more »ElKevbo (talk) 04:37, 29 August 2025 (UTC) Keep. Seems like a valid WP:SPINOUT. We should cover the departments at the University. The solution here is...
Click to read more »these are not a reason for deletion. Character lists are considered valid spinout articles when the list becomes too long or contains to many significant...
Click to read more »seem to be notability in a technical sense, but whether this is a useful spinout article per WP:SS. About that, people can in good faith disagree. Sandstein...
Click to read more »to be a para or two then I see redirect with the possibility of later SPINOUT as better. ~Hydronium~Hydroxide~(Talk)~ 13:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC) Re...
Click to read more »be moved by any uninvolved editor to the talk page of the article.) WP:SPINOUT articles are not subject to deletion, as the remedy is to unspin them. ...
Click to read more »NorthAmerica1000 05:05, 25 September 2014 (UTC) Keep as an entirely valid WP:SPINOUT from the Christina Aguilera article. Per WP:SIZERULE, merging back to the...
Click to read more »significant possibility of a merge to Streaking. This appears to be a WP:SPINOUT of the Streaking article, per the "Main article: Streaking at educational...
Click to read more »(UTC) Redirect to Rooster Teeth or delete. Does not seem notable, and the spinout was premature. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2013 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »per Dream Focus. Standard WP:SPINOUT article Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 02:07, 4 June 2020 (UTC) Satellizer, spinout articles are useful as a matter...
Click to read more »article is quite short overall. I suspect this is a case of premature spinout combined with a little too much plot. It would also be reasonable to rename...
Click to read more »be reduced to the acceptable limit, 300 words, it would not be a viable spinout article either. Sceptre (talk) 13:27, 10 February 2009 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Omloop der Kempen as a valid alternative to deletion. Agreed that the spinout is pretty much of low value at this point. Red Phoenix talk 14:59, 22 July...
Click to read more »independent. Reyk YO! 06:38, 20 March 2010 (UTC) Keep Perfectly acceptable spinout article to keep the main article from growing too long. It certainly does...
Click to read more »dumping-ground. This could be better developed in the e.tv article per WP:SPINOUT and redirects are costly. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:11, 4 July 2022 (UTC)...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was keep . consensus is spinout is needed. I'll admit this was not your usual AfD discussion. Refreshing...
Click to read more »bibliography, but there's no other text there. I'm undecided, but making a spinout article of Card's anthologies, and merging this and its peers there, seems...
Click to read more »and chapters, such lists have long been considered appropriate for WP:SPINOUT reasons. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 10:43, 5 May 2019 (UTC) Comment:...
Click to read more »opinion laughable. With the fictional work itself acceptable for WP:V, a WP:SPINOUT based upon the notability of the parent is always acceptable per guideline...
Click to read more »were to become too long, then portions of it could be WP:SPLIT into WP:SPINOUT articles. It's also a functional article for navigation as per WP:LISTPURP...
Click to read more »fictional minutia that fails to establish notability. It is not a justified spinout because the details of these fictional species can easily be described...
Click to read more »being a standalone article. Wikipedia doesn't yet need this list, per WP:SPINOUT. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:33, 16 May 2017 (UTC) Delete as stand alone article...
Click to read more »doesn't normally have activity coverage of such a topic unless it is a WP:SPINOUT article. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 23:09, 23 September 2012 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »editorial decisions with regard to depth-of-coverage and the degree to which spinout articles are acceptable. Regardless, per-plane articles? Not part of the...
Click to read more »Considered as an article about a theological concept, this is a non-notable spinout of intelligent design. ~ Ningauble (talk) 14:26, 14 September 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Very-large-scale integration systems, for which is very improbable to warrant a WP:SPINOUT of any form. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 11:59, 28 March 2015 (UTC) Delete The understanding...
Click to read more »Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:13, 26 December 2015 (UTC) Keep. This is a WP:SPINOUT from the parent articles on the finals. While it may seem like "minutiae"...
Click to read more »character has sufficient coverage in reliable, secondary sources where spinout articles are justified. Rorshacma (talk) 14:34, 6 May 2022 (UTC) Keep or...
Click to read more »pointless. --MrShamrock (talk) 09:16, 13 January 2009 (UTC) Keep - as a viable spinout of Terms of endearment but trim to BlueLinks. I think it fits, and most...
Click to read more »05:14, 17 September 2008 (UTC) Delete I'd love for this to be kept as a spinout article, but there really doesn't appear to be anything of note to anyone...
Click to read more »appropriate section on the main article on the series, without the need for a spinout article. Additionally, the current article has almost zero real-world information...
Click to read more »Q. Schmidt (talk) 03:47, 29 July 2008 (UTC) Keep Reasonable topic for spinout article per WP:FICT and WAF. Hobit (talk) 18:55, 29 July 2008 (UTC) Also:...
Click to read more »--Jack Upland (talk) 05:17, 30 November 2019 (UTC) Delete as unnecessary spinout not independently notable. Sergecross73 msg me 14:52, 30 November 2019...
Click to read more »specific. SwisterTwister talk 18:36, 31 December 2015 (UTC) Keep – Valid WP:SPINOUT of List of Universal Pictures films, which is already too long at 260 kB...
Click to read more »info (which is actually good) still doesn't mean it qualifies as a WP:SPINOUT yet. – sgeureka t•c 23:29, 22 January 2020 (UTC) Merge to List of Hollyoaks...
Click to read more »an editor will lead to the creation of many more specialized articles ("spinout"), in this particular case Structural history of the Roman military, Campaign...
Click to read more »parole hearing) and since there is some depth to the coverage (and perp spinout is possible, particularly post-conviction per WP:CRIMINAL) - however as...
Click to read more »ZXCVBNM (TALK) 00:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC) Keep. Strikes me as a legitimate spinout from a potentially overlong article on a lengthy series of novels. Needs...
Click to read more »speedy, though possibly it is for WP:SNOW) - Episode lists are standard spinout material for television series articles, with notability tightly associated...
Click to read more »but there isn't any coverage I am seeing that would justify this as a spinout article. Rorshacma (talk) 20:51, 31 August 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »its own notability created/proven, the article can be recraeted per WP:SPINOUT. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 12:05, 15 May 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An unnecessary spinout from List of Roblox games on a series of Roblox games that, on it's own...
Click to read more »steam, and the article about Jewish-American organized crime was due a spinout. It's a sourced article with a good start to it. Mandsford (talk) 02:13...
Click to read more »02:56, 31 October 2012 (UTC) Delete WP:NOTDIR and doesn't need its own spinout. If it had sources, I'd say merge, but right now I don't see any details...
Click to read more »aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 10:07, 22 June 2022 (UTC) Keep A valid spinout list. Just like we have lists of episodes, we also have character lists...
Click to read more »→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 05:20, 8 June 2014 (UTC) Delete. Crufty and non-notable spinout that really has no mergeable content. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:23, 8...
Click to read more »or independent notability of this minor character, and does not meet WP:SPINOUT of any other article. Ghostwheel ʘ 03:12, 12 June 2015 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »Anonymous DissidentTalk 23:37, 29 February 2008 (UTC) This looks like a spinout of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV series)#DVD releases. If this is a sub-article...
Click to read more »there (see Kotaku and Joystiq as examples), but it's unnecessary article spinout. --Teancum (talk) 13:05, 31 January 2011 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »anime. A spinout of the anime, dealing with both, may be warranted or a spinout on the worldwide impact of SM may be warranted, but not a spinout of English...
Click to read more »mention it briefly in the context of its respective video game. Unnecessary spinout, should just be covered briefly in its parent article. Sergecross73 msg...
Click to read more »Ognenovski. It is appropriately covered there. That article is getting large, a spinout may be justified. Spinning out Tale_Ognenovski#Compositions_and_recordings...
Click to read more »on this character is up for deletion as being non-notable, perhaps this spinout article, (Artwork of Isaac Mendez), should be bundled with the nomination...
Click to read more »2026 (UTC) Redirect to Bagmati Province#Sports. Barely sourced and short spinout, the content can be easily covered in the parent article. Kelob2678 (talk)...
Click to read more »indiscriminate collection of information (as opposed to a legitimate WP:SS spinout) could be solved by editing it down to a reduced size and merging it back...
Click to read more »run for the full 7 days and disallow recreation except with consensus to spinout. Alpha3031 (t • c) 03:03, 10 June 2023 (UTC) Redirect. While I err on the...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom. This is not a history article, it's a half-fast spinout of the list articles as mentioned above. History articles need stuff like...
Click to read more »humanoids from the mind of Alan Dean Foster, I'd have no objection to one spinout article about the planets or the different groups. Mandsford (talk) 16:34...
Click to read more »article Odoo. Yes, this draft is an unjustified unwatched WP:UNDUE WP:SPINOUT. It should be redirected to Odoo as an editorial action. --SmokeyJoe (talk)...
Click to read more »replace its current terrible "In Popular Culture" section, nothing from this spinout would be useful in preserving for such a section, being a largely unsourced...
Click to read more »21 October 2010 (UTC) Merge to author's page, with no prejudice against spinout when the book is published and once it meets WP:BK. Jclemens (talk) 19:55...
Click to read more »by itself, but worthy of inclusion in Bowin Cars untill such time as a spinout is possible. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 09:11, 10 May 2009 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »WP:SPINOUT to keep Yahoo! from having WP:UNDUE while keeping the usefulness of the info in the article. 2. may not need to meet separate N per SPINOUT/that...
Click to read more »main LOE page. Insufficient real-world information here to require this spinout article. Eusebeus (talk) 14:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC) Delete, malformed title...
Click to read more »VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:12, 7 January 2014 (UTC) Keep as a reasonable WP:SPINOUT from the Kevin Spencer (TV series) article. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:16...
Click to read more »lists of every item that is verifiably a member of the group. (5) Per WP:SPINOUT, splitting a large article into logically distinct sub-articles is encouraged...
Click to read more »Fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Per WP:POPCULTURE, this is an unnecessary article spinout. The guideline itself says, "Attempt to pare the section down first. In...
Click to read more »discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 20:06, 17 July 2009 (UTC) Keep Reasonable spinout of notable comic strip. Failing that, Merge into Bloom County. Jclemens...
Click to read more »water is more appropriate. Probably, this material should be considered a spinout of Properties_of_water#Polarity.2C_hydrogen_bonding_and_inter-molecular_structure...
Click to read more »better developed article later on or during this process. Yet as a WP:SPINOUT the BBG article is currently not developed enough for existence next to...
Click to read more »this page. The result was keep after the restructuring. It's a decent spinout of the main subject now and merging it to the parent article would make...
Click to read more »LOC: non-notable character, no real world significance, no reason for a spinout. Eusebeus (talk) 19:57, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Keep It even has commons...
Click to read more »WP:SPINOUT per WP:MOS-AM, widely used and long-recognized. 192.251.134.5 (talk) 20:35, 1 June 2012 (UTC) Comment - Have you really read over WP:SPINOUT?...
Click to read more »Moreover, the biography article does not meet size requirements for a spinout in accordance with WP:LIMIT.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:36, 25 January...
Click to read more »apply to lists as being discussed in the notability discussion guidelines. Spinout reasons alone suggest this is too big for Animal Crossing. Thus can't be...
Click to read more »Keep—I see two references in the article now, and unless we are calling the Spinouts reference unreliable, I think that's enough to show notability. Livit⇑Eh...
Click to read more »subjects must have some coverage by reliable secondary sources, and WP:SPINOUT does not make any articles exceptions. What must be considered is simply...
Click to read more »(talk · contribs) 13:19, 23 February 2009 (UTC) So much so that we need spinout articles on each character? - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire - past ops) 17:55...
Click to read more »used another. Dream Focus 13:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Keep - a valid WP:SPINOUT due to the fact its size, if included in the main article, would be WP:UNDUE;...
Click to read more »Galamsey. Can be revisited if sustained coverage after the fact merits a spinout Star Mississippi 17:57, 3 October 2024 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »episodes, which describes the plot in-depth, making this an unnecessary WP:SPINOUT. All sources on this antagonist are all in the context of its role in those...
Click to read more »notwithstanding, I disagree that the Conker series is notable enough for WP:SPINOUT to be a valid argument. Especially considering that it consists of only...
Click to read more »per the rationale above by User:Orlady; makes sense as a reasonable WP:SPINOUT. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is...
Click to read more »abandoned draft. Perhaps improving Hörmander's vanishing theorem until a spinout is appropriate? (Edit) that does not exist, so maybe that is the place...
Click to read more »List of Source mods - not enough sourcing or content to warrant its own spinout. Sergecross73 msg me 13:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC) Redirect Per Sergecross...
Click to read more »the parent article, but considering the size I would prefer keeping this spinout article. Cavarrone 04:16, 31 July 2013 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »spinout. *puzzled look* I don't see a basis given for that claim, but if the argument is one of article history, I don't agree. Even if the spinout criteria...
Click to read more »(WP:SRE) to Noggin (brand)#Mobile applications. This draft is an unjustified spinout. Justification requires some discussion of it at Talk:Noggin (brand). The...
Click to read more »a lot of coverage so plenty to choose from. Altogether a legitimate WP:SPINOUT and good organization of information. I wish the girls article came anywhere...
Click to read more »not be used for WP:UNDUE spinouts, instead, expand existing coverage where it is, and seek talkpage concensus for any WP:SPINOUT. It is very unlikely that...
Click to read more »rest puts WP:UNDUE weight on plot (WP:NOT#PLOT) and doesn't qualify for a spinout (yet). Would be okay as a search term though. Seems to be worth a weak...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not enough to meet WP:CONTENTFORK or WP:SPINOUT in my opinion. This is simply content pasted from each model's lead. We...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Not enough to meet WP:CONTENTFORK or WP:SPINOUT in my opinion. Largely redundant information found in each handheld's article...
Click to read more »amount of RS coverage I'm not finding, I don't see the need for this many spinout articles, hence my recommendation to merge and trim as viciously as needed...
Click to read more »2FPOV_forking_is_not it's classed as an article spinout. --neonwhite user page talk 03:47, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Ah, the "it's a spinout not a fork" argument - totally wrong...
Click to read more »Redirect to Alberta general election, 2008 for the time being, enabling spinout of any actually notable people. The rest can safely be deleted, and I will...
Click to read more »Filmation. But either way, the decision about whether to keep the list as a spinout article or merge it back to the company's page is not cause for deletion...
Click to read more »sense to keep this article as a spinout of the main article on the show, given its size. WP:MOSFICT permits such spinout articles (in rare cases), provided...
Click to read more »23:23, 8 April 2026 (UTC) Merge into Donar (basketball) as an unjustified SPINOUT and an ATD. Regardless of the notability question already addressed in...
Click to read more »Delete both, no real need for these, they aren't long enough to warrant a spinout. Szzuk (talk) 10:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC) The extra cricketers added after...
Click to read more »21:40, 2 January 2020 (UTC) Keep It can be considered a legitimate WP:SPINOUT for a TV show spanning decades, the sourcing is fine, it's got no problems...
Click to read more »independently notable from the show itself, this article is an unnecessary spinout, and a general overview of the concept is already adequately described...
Click to read more »sourced, prose section discussing the film's ample use of homages. This spinout is nothing but a list of trivia that goes against the manual of style....
Click to read more »probably isn't sufficient information to warrant this article under WP:SPINOUT. Furthermore, this article does not establish its subject independent notability...
Click to read more »article does not pass WP:FICT on its own and it does not seem to be a valid spinout of any specific Dragonball article -- or if it is, it's not clearly so...
Click to read more »(talk) 03:00, 11 July 2018 (UTC) Keep. It looks like an appropriate WP:SPINOUT of the quite large Port Adelaide Football Club. May fail LISTN, but it...
Click to read more »and has no references to meet WP:GNG or WP:LISTN. It is not a valid WP:SPINOUT because there is nothing to show that the context of the plot information...
Click to read more »2023 (UTC) Merge to List of Mortal Kombat characters, another unjustified spinout. (Or just restore what I assume was there before the split). ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ)...
Click to read more »so it should better be covered in a main article until it's time to WP:SPINOUT. – sgeureka t•c 17:56, 11 January 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unreferenced article. With zero sources justifying a WP:SPINOUT, this is a WP:BADFORK of Szczecin.4meter4 (talk) 01:03, 24 November 2025...
Click to read more »a title belt design is pointless. And it doesn't deserve neither a WP:SPINOUT and WP:SIZERULE - the main WWE Championship article is at 41KB, as of now...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) An unnecessary spinout from Burnout Paradise. While the soundtrack received coverage in the context...
Click to read more »under-developed and of unclear provenance. The appropriate way to do these sorts of spinout articles is when the main article becomes too large and then material is...
Click to read more »(film). Violates WP:NOT#PLOT in its purest form and is not needed as a spinout at this time (plot is already summarized in the film articles). Would be...
Click to read more »character article is still well within WP:SIZE recommendations, and this spinout is both short and non-WP:NOTABLE. There's no sense in spinning out sections...
Click to read more »discussed in Candyman (1992 film) until that hits size limits to allow for WP:SPINOUTs. – sgeureka t•c 15:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC) I slightly changed my !vote:...
Click to read more »Animation#Characters), so perhaps a redirect to there? Either way, this particular spinout list is not an appropriate list article. Aside from the issues noted in...
Click to read more »--Colapeninsula (talk) 09:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC) Keep - A reasonable WP:SPINOUT of Family Feud that also meets WP:LISTPURP. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:51...
Click to read more »(film). Violates WP:NOT#PLOT in its purest form and is not needed as a spinout at this time (plot is already summarized in the film articles). Would be...
Click to read more »that doesn't directly pertain to Archie Mafeje. I suggest that this be WP:SPINOUT and the section focus on Mafeje's actions. *"The immediate aftermath" section...
Click to read more »characters are already fully covered on the main Megatokyo article, and this spinout list is just overly detailed plot summaries and speculations based entirely...
Click to read more »Dream Focus 13:46, 7 June 2022 (UTC) Keep as a valid WP:SPLIT and WP:SPINOUT from the main Girls' Generation article. Per WP:SIZERULE, articles over...
Click to read more »manga-related deletion discussions. ミラP 14:58, 19 January 2020 (UTC) Delete - Spinout has not established notability in and of itself. Red Phoenix talk 05:38...
Click to read more »notability, however the article is a totally unjustified near-complete SPINOUT (technically still a spinoff). One quick look at Egypt–Gaza border#Buffer...
Click to read more »of Mortal Kombat characters. Very minor character with an unnecessary spinout - merits only a list entry. The reception scrapes the bottom of the barrel...
Click to read more »and the main article are long enough to maintained this as a separate spinout article or to merge it back into the main Silk Way Airlines article could...
Click to read more »Keep/Rename it's not a POV fork, it's a page split. See NASCAR#Criticism and WP:SPINOUT. It should be moved to Criticism of NASCAR to keep in line with naming...
Click to read more »are rather short, not warranting a separate article for this book per WP:SPINOUT and WP:PAGEDECIDE. Moreover, the article on book has not had a real source...
Click to read more »notable work; the options are merger to the parent work or retaining the spinout article, and that's not an AFD issues. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:33...
Click to read more »to be answered is if there is sufficient information for there to be a spinout article like this Fritzpoll (talk) 18:25, 29 March 2008 (UTC) Comment If...
Click to read more »editor deciding for themselves it was required. As it doesn't fall under WP:SPINOUT, on its' own merits it's very light on any real content and the characters...
Click to read more »Further, this is not a content fork but an "article spinout"; see Wikipedia:Content forking#Article spinouts - "Summary style" articles and also how this is...
Click to read more »political and commercial/personal conflict-of-interest editing as a WP:SPINOUT, I can see how that overlap would be handled. As Conflict-of-interest editing...
Click to read more »carry). This article is not a content fork, it is a sub-topic (see WP:SPINOUT: in principle, we could move the material from the concealed carry article...
Click to read more »(writing about fiction)#Summary style approach "Very rarely should such spinout articles be about a singular topic (e.g., character, plot item); either...
Click to read more »(history · last edit) from http://update.dit.ie/2010/27-09-10/news-briefs-spinout.php. Much verbatim material and foundational. Needs a complete rewrite...
Click to read more »was merge to AI safety. Fear that the subtopic may someday qualify for a spinout is not a valid reason to oppose a merge today. Owen× ☎ 07:09, 18 July 2026...
Click to read more »the deadline, no worries. ;) What Splinter describes above is a valid spinout, a common practice of spreading a subject over multiple articles when one...
Click to read more »sources are not used in the article, many sources are dubious, and some WP:SPINOUT and trimming needs to happen to reduce the size of the article. Considering...
Click to read more »history preserved until such time as sufficient sourcing exists for a spinout Star Mississippi 21:42, 20 October 2023 (UTC) [Hide this box] New to Articles...
Click to read more »ALL DETAILS ARE MISSING at Channel 10 (Israel). As a totally IMPROPER SPINOUT it should be merged into Channel 10. There is another procedure for mergers...
Click to read more »the first place it should go is the target article. A very premature spinout. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:37, 1 May 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »Gene93k (talk) 16:03, 21 August 2010 (UTC) Keep - entirely reasonable spinout article from Madonna (entertainer). Madonna's status as a gay icon is well-established...
Click to read more »Godzilla publications. However, Gabara only appears in one film, so a spinout probably isn't necessary. Zagalejo^^^ 03:31, 23 December 2008 (UTC) Keep...
Click to read more »obvious The Missouri Senate campaign article has exactly ONE spinout, namely this one. Spinouts are generally DIScouraged, the EXCEPTION being articles that...
Click to read more »Jewish view of Jesus but instead legitimate article spinout (see Wikipedia:Content forking#Article spinouts - "Summary style" articles). --LambiamTalk 01:12...
Click to read more »significant independent coverage is uncovered in the future, please start a spinout discussion on the target's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 12:28, 18 May 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Article size contains some relevant information. I would not spinout AK-47 until that sub-section has grown so large that it overwhelms the...
Click to read more »This meets all the applicable policies and guidelines, and is a valid spinout from the main article which should have the aforementioned "main" template...
Click to read more »relevant to plot summary there. Otherwise delete as not notable for a spinout. ~ Ningauble (talk) 18:43, 27 September 2008 (UTC) Relisted to generate...
Click to read more »[1]. Anon Cummings is the player character in that game, a plausible spinout. Premature, given the difficulty in bringing the game itself up to Stub...
Click to read more »size at WP:AS and WP:TOOBIG that an article would be considered for WP:SPINOUT. I think this article needs an overhaul and unnecessary detail moved out...
Click to read more »encouraged, as a way of making articles clearer and easier to manage."), WP:SPINOUT, and Wikipedia:Summary style. At most, if it isn't "necessary" to maintain...
Click to read more »Possibly not enough for NORG but that doesn't matter. As an improper SPINOUT of University of Tennessee Medical Center, a short article as well, it...
Click to read more »where the JPost Lite is missing entirely. Our article is an unjustified SPINOUT. A selective merge would fix that, plus function as a fine ATD. gidonb...
Click to read more »(UTC) I accept that you intended the list to be a guideline supported WP:Spinout of the main article, as such information always tends to overburden the...
Click to read more »subsection could accommodate the additional info. I see no need to do a spinout called "People and culture of" for any state, province, county, etc. Mandsford...
Click to read more »Merge into parent per current lacking sourcing and args above, and can be SPINOUT if needed later. Widefox; talk 11:43, 22 January 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »ViperSnake151 Talk 17:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC) Keep As legitimate spinout of main article with sourced content. There may be some POV issues to certain...
Click to read more »- no way. — Hellknowz ▎talk 19:26, 2 June 2010 (UTC) Delete this NN spinout, and severely improve the list from which it originated. Both articles...
Click to read more »included in those articles, and what material would best be included in some spinout article. From the standpoint of building construction, as it were, we've...
Click to read more »need coverage, neither establishing notability or justifying itself as a spinout. Demon lord (Dungeons & Dragons), although it should likely be deleted...
Click to read more »from the addition of this timeline and is not so long as to merit a WP:SPINOUT. 24.151.56.107 (talk) 18:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC) Keep, I sourced it,...
Click to read more »article at 100 kB, so the Mar Saba Letter article seems like a natural WP:SPINOUT with the Mar Saba Letter article describing the discovery and the Secret...
Click to read more »section in the university article, similar to Warner Royals. No prejudice to spinout if the article becomes too big.—Bagumba (talk) 18:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)...
Click to read more »discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:16, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Weak keep - WP:SPINOUT articles for the lead article Equity Awards. Awards with multiple categories...
Click to read more »(UTC) Merge and redirect to Linux_Foundation#Automotive_Grade_Linux. WP:Spinouts should be first built up at the parent article. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:19...
Click to read more »are going to be extraordinarily few that actually meet the need to be WP:SPINOUT articles due to size concerns alone. Excluding that they probably already...
Click to read more »list is 30K. deisenbe (talk) 09:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC) Keep per WP:SPINOUT. 68.189.242.116 (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »posted it at List of World of Springfield figures and playsets per WP:SPINOUT. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:25, 11 November 2012 (UTC) Keep - Per Cyclopia...
Click to read more »followed up upon either. Until this topic is developed into a proper WP:SPINOUT, this topic should be covered in the List of races. – sgeureka t•c 08:05...
Click to read more »considered and proposed on the talk page(s) if this does not meet the WP:SPINOUT rules but even the nominator admits that this content might be included...
Click to read more »1492 (talk) 04:44, 9 July 2013 (UTC) Keep as a reasonable, verified WP:SPINOUT of the 2013 protests in Turkey article. Ordinarily I'd consider a merge...
Click to read more »spanning 11 films will get deleted (it's probably regarded as a reasonable spinout for size). And if the LoC gets deleted down the road, then the redirects...
Click to read more »which WP:NOTSTATSBOOK is addressed. Length would be a reason to create spinout articles, not to delete this. --Arxiloxos (talk) 16:38, 14 January 2015...
Click to read more »Main article is clearly notable award winning game, others are reasonable spinout articles. Edward321 (talk) 03:20, 12 February 2011 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »discussed but at first blush this looks like it's long enough to justify a spinout article in any case. In any event, deletion is not appropriate. --Arxiloxos...
Click to read more »00:40, 13 August 2009 (UTC) Ah, yes, that would be where this would be a spinout of. Merge (selectively) to List of Mobile Suit Gundam SEED mobile weapons...
Click to read more »of the Doctor that appeared in it is notable in his own right so that a spinout article is needed, and pretty much all of the information regarding the...
Click to read more »information (good), but nothing really non-trivial (bad). Not enough for a spinout article. – sgeureka t•c 11:08, 14 September 2008 (UTC) Merge to Space Channel...
Click to read more »(UTC) Again, you are not knowledged in what a proper application of WP:SPINOUT and WP:SAL are. As established in similar AFDs, lists are not subject to...
Click to read more »Talk 03:53, 9 July 2014 (UTC) Keep per the others above; valid as a WP:SPINOUT of the Paul McCartney article. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 04:04, 9 July...
Click to read more »to have significant coverage independent of the subject. Looks like a spinout article into a catalog-type listing without the coverage in reliable sources...
Click to read more »to Israeli–Lebanese conflict#Israeli incursions into Lebanon until WP:SPINOUT is satisfied. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Iglesia (talk) 21:40, 26 October 2016 (UTC) Delete - Unneccesary article spinout. Sergecross73 msg me 01:03, 27 October 2016 (UTC) Delete I will point out...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) A spinout of iOS jailbreaking, this article should never have existed in the first...
Click to read more »--Mr.Irfan Nasir 11:44, 16 July 2012 (UTC) Delete - Unnecessary article spinout. None of the images have rationale for these pages, and references/text...
Click to read more »already present in Buffyverse#Watchers, and there is no need for a WP:SPINOUT in such a state. Redirect or delete? – sgeureka t•c 07:35, 12 January 2020...
Click to read more »CitrouillesTally-ho! 16:21, 26 May 2008 (UTC) Spinout articles are indeed perfectly acceptable, provided that the spinout subject can itself satisfy WP:N (and...
Click to read more »Riftwar Cycle. That would be at least vaguely policy compliant (per WP:SPINOUT and the willingness to accept plot and setting summaries as essential to...
Click to read more »maybe wiser to add found information to a parent article and wait for SPINOUT potential. – sgeureka t•c 21:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »Maccabiah articles. The immediate problem here is premature WP:SPINOFF/WP:SPINOUT. As pointed out by nom, the WP:GNG is not (clearly) met for the minor sports...
Click to read more »meshach (talk) 21:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC) No vote from the creator; just a spinout of listcruft from Spoken word. <eleland/talkedits> 21:39, 9 December 2007...
Click to read more »Miss Indonesia Universe winners seems discriminate enough for a valid spinout. ThemFromSpace 03:04, 29 May 2010 (UTC) Comment The Miss Indonesia Universe...
Click to read more »Shuja'iyya Popular Defense Forces as an ATD, to undo unnecessary fragmentation SPINOUT ("user experience from hell") in an extensively covered domain. gidonb...
Click to read more »(UTC) Merge to Red Velvet (band). While this could be viewed as a valid WP:SPINOUT from the main article, merging to the main article will make it more comprehensive...
Click to read more »characters are, by the article title, 'minor' - so this isn't a valid spinout, even if that section of WP:FICT were undisputed. Percy Snoodle (talk)...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC) Keep Character lists are acceptable spinout articles to keep main articles from growing too large. No legimate reason...
Click to read more »unnecessary details. Consensus is that this content fork is an inappropriate spinout whose subject matter could be covered in the National Civilian Community...
Click to read more »article, would make said article inaccessible and worse for it. Per WP:SPINOUT, separating to another article is the right thing to do. Hence, this article...
Click to read more »find a place for this super useful reference article. It is a reasonable spinout from the Excel page for that manner, something that could go there except...
Click to read more »having only seen it Merge to appropriate section at Newsround. No need to spinout an article when the section within the main article will never grow "out...
Click to read more »October 2024 (UTC) @Zanimum: This article might be a good candidate to WP:SPINOUT sections of its history. This has already started with Disney Renaissance...
Click to read more »WP:NPOV with this separate article. Instead this article is merely a WP:SPINOUT. Per WP:NOTE, this article already shows enough reliable sources and can...
Click to read more »to !vote here (though I think, in general, that there is little need to spinout such an article) - however if this goes, then Delete !voters here should...
Click to read more »February 2024 (UTC) Merge into Stuttering therapy as a FORK or unjustified SPINOUT. This kind of fragmentation creates a user experience from hell! gidonb...
Click to read more »incorrect organization of information, for example by WP:SPINOFF or WP:SPINOUT. Hence, there is no intrinsic problem with the arguments made above, only...
Click to read more »was working on a possible "Ratchet culture" article recently (which is a spinout from the colloquial use of "ratchet" that blew up with the Miley Cyrus...
Click to read more »list! Hardly any core and almost everything out of scope. Also by SPINOFF/SPINOUT (information governance) logic, the article doesn't fly. gidonb (talk)...
Click to read more »company[1], as is KM[2]). The only other one, "Reach for me", was released by Spinout, for which I was unable to determine its notability but which has no article...
Click to read more »Cultural heritage#Issues in cultural heritage, which may lead to a WP:SPINOUT. SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:44, 30 July 2026 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »22:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Keep I think this article qualifies as a viable spinout article, so long as we expand it a bit. There is a multitude of source...
Click to read more »spinoff or a spinout? How are these distinguished? Where are they defined? The names do not provide much clarity as to how a spinoff or spinout are distinguished...
Click to read more »remove it. I don't see how this is any different than any of the other spinout articles for actors or musicians listing their awards won. Category:Lists...
Click to read more »covered at the main character article, making this a rather redundant spinout article. Rorshacma (talk) 02:47, 5 July 2024 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »the nomination do not apply. This is not a content fork but an article spinout. The information given here is not "loosely associated" but specifically...
Click to read more »18 February 2021 (UTC) Merge to Fairfield University. No need for a WP:SPINOUT for the college; however the historical info and notable faculty listed...
Click to read more »that either it is non-notable, or no-one wants to work on it to pass WP:SPINOUT. The episode list can take care of the plot and relevant production data...
Click to read more »offensive. Same Israeli operation, too. Yet another totall unncessary WP:SPINOUT in this topic area leading to fragmented coverage that doesn't benefit...
Click to read more »sourced article is offered on THAT topic, this would then be a reasonable spinout list article, and THIS would then not be a G8 and merit an undeletion if...
Click to read more »Template:Spinout (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:Spinout/title (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) Template:Spinout/link (talk ·...
Click to read more »article to Sulphur_dioxide#As_a_preservative. No prejudice to recreation if spinout articles become needful. - Eldereft ~(s)talk~ 17:30, 14 April 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »characters, but not because for lack of notability, but lack of reason for a spinout at this time. The LoC already covers the character in nearly the same depth...
Click to read more »lists its episodes, and when that list is long enough it gets made into a spinout article. Sometimes people look at the name NOTTVGUIDE and don't actually...
Click to read more »another article. – sgeureka t•c 17:32, 22 April 2009 (UTC) Keep as WP:SS spinout covering a fictional element of an unquestionably notable franchise without...
Click to read more »(in the last year) be making promotional edits to promote [1] and it's spinout company (CEO of speechGear is a 'R. Palmquist' - worth looking at this...
Click to read more »The redirect tells all old authors where to go. If someone thinks that a spinout should be drafted, the answer should be "no". The unproduced film is barely...
Click to read more »in the main article for the notable series, it is acceptable to have a spinout article to hold the valid content. This however is just a copy and pasted...
Click to read more »April 2021 (UTC) In addition, Not enough to meet WP:CONTENTFORK or WP:SPINOUT in my humble opinion.Blue Pumpkin Pie (talk) 20:30, 20 April 2021 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Organogallium chemistry, and there is no apparent reason to WP:FORK or WP:SPINOUT a Organogallium peroxides article. Delete. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 13:48,...
Click to read more »together. Kiki360 (talk) 22:21, 6 January 2014 (UTC) Keep as an apparent WP:SPINOUT from Aliados. I'm not opposed to a merge of this back to Aliados though...
Click to read more »leave a message... 10:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC) Keep Perfectly valid WP:SPINOUT article. This is how it is done. Category:Career achievements of sportspeople...
Click to read more »short tables that are in the parent article John Cazale, there's no reason for this to exist as WP:SPINOUT.—BrechtBro (talk) 22:06, 10 August 2026 (UTC)...
Click to read more »lacks context, so the merge is a no-brainer. A clear case of unjustified SPINOUT, creating excessive fragmentation, and a user experience from hell (chasing...
Click to read more »vis-à-vis WP:IAR. The article technically also qualifies as a reasonable WP:SPINOUT of the Internet Archive article per WP:SIZERULE. Also of note is that the...
Click to read more »(selective) to Hitler Youth which is at 16kb of prose and does not need a rank spinout. Sources do seem to exist for ranks in the Hitler Youth - e.g. this seems...
Click to read more »separate article. There is still a long way to go before this reaches WP:SPINOUT length. If the list becomes a problem in the main article than a stand...
Click to read more »comprised of in-universe, non-sourced plot information, it could be a valid spinout, but a quick look for sources is turning up nothing that would allow for...
Click to read more »lists in the cause of death category. Consideration should be made for WP:SPINOUT but that's outside of the scope of this AfD and can be discussed on the...
Click to read more »also that the Dwight Eisenhower page is tagged as too long and, per WP:SPINOUT, "very large articles should be split into logically separate articles...
Click to read more »articles, when well-maintained are remotely large enough to require WP:SPINOUT. -Verdatum (talk) 00:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC) Merge (with a trim) As Mintrick...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is a spinout from Luca A. Longobardi, which is also at AfD. I'm nominating this for...
Click to read more »(talk) 14:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Keep per WP:FICT which explicitly allows spinout List of Episode articles for series. Eusebeus (talk) 20:14, 12 June 2008...
Click to read more »Speedy Keep. Over 84,000 bytes of article was created in according to WP:SPINOUT. It's a reasonable split and there was agreement between at least 4 editors...
Click to read more »normally this would not be a stand alone page it is an appropriate WP:SPINOUT. Legacypac (talk) 18:37, 2 December 2018 (UTC) The Bushes have nothing...
Click to read more »more obscure players (like Rafer Alston), so this seems like a reasonable spinout of the article on the magazine. Zagalejo^^^ 19:11, 10 May 2009 (UTC) Can't...
Click to read more »and Maryland. Let'srun (talk) 01:29, 1 December 2024 (UTC) Keep as a spinout from Johns Hopkins University, which is the subject of the article. The...
Click to read more »compelling size issues with the parent article to justify making this a spinout in my appraisal, and direct content forks are discouraged. Squeamish Ossifrage...
Click to read more »games. And crosslink that from the main Space Battleship Yamato page as a spinout of that. —Quasirandom (talk) 19:12, 13 August 2009 (UTC) fourth game ;)...
Click to read more »Searches are not showing any kind of sources that would support or justify a spinout character list, let alone a specific enemies list, for Ibis. Rorshacma...
Click to read more »it should first be covered in Journey to the West and then spun out WP:SPINOUT, but currently it's not even mentioned there. – sgeureka t•c 11:48, 27...
Click to read more »If and when sources establishing independent notability are found, a spinout discussion can be pursued editorially. Owen× ☎ 12:51, 28 July 2025 (UTC)...
Click to read more »be cited, but the absence of proper sourcing we cannot keep a separate spinout for each individual year (especially ones that contain BLP-flouting assertions...
Click to read more »it's not verifiable and as such the content is not even suitable for a spinout. Percy Snoodle (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2008 (UTC) Please recall that _topics_...
Click to read more »snowball keep. Otherwise, I see no other reason for there to have a separate spinout article on types of gamers (with the exception of girl gamer, but that...
Click to read more »covers it in appropriate detail. These articles look like unnecessary spinouts for non-notable ventures, but maybe someone else can find sources. I don't...
Click to read more »WP:Notability. At the moment, this article violates WP:NOT#PLOT, WP:WAF and WP:SPINOUT, but there is no content in the parent article-list, so it's worth preserving...
Click to read more »Delete WP:NOT —Ruud 11:08, 25 July 2016 (UTC) Delete in favour of AVL tree. Spinouts should begin as sections in the parent article, before considering Wikipedia:Splitting...
Click to read more »move the consensus into a no consensus position. This seems a legitimate spinout article from Star_Wars#Legacy. There was no consensus that this article...
Click to read more »(UTC) Merge into Canada–Denmark relations. This is clearly an improper SPINOUT, not mentioned at the parent other than "see also". The reverse embassy...
Click to read more »Jewish view of Jesus but instead legitimate article spinout (see Wikipedia:Content forking#Article spinouts - "Summary style" articles). --LambiamTalk 01:21...
Click to read more »(talk) 19:05, 5 August 2008 (UTC) Keep Character lists are legitimate spinout articles to keep the main article from growing too long. Edward321 (talk)...
Click to read more »sources) and the subject isn't notable. Editors are advised to follow WP:SPINOUT when attempting this sort of thing. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:21, 23 June...
Click to read more »manga. - Mgm|(talk) 12:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC) Keep. Valid and typical spinout list for a notable series. Contra MacGyverMagic, the article its linked...
Click to read more »6 July 2021 (UTC) *Delete - Character lists can certainly be a valid spinout article for a piece of media, but they still need to actually be supported...
Click to read more »already has an extensive character list section, making this a needless spinout. The major plot information for the characters is already included in the...
Click to read more »really hard, I acknowledge that for at least some episodes, but per WP:SPINOUT there is simply no reason for wikipedia to have them as separate articles...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Keep - meets both WP:GNG and WP:AIRCRASH, and is a valid WP:SPINOUT from the movie article, where the current coverage of the accident, compared...
Click to read more »JBsupreme (talk) 08:47, 9 March 2010 (UTC) Keep Perfectly acceptable spinout to keep the main article form growing too long. Edward321 (talk) 15:07...
Click to read more »is the word "rarely" in the following passage: "Very rarely should such spinout articles be about a singular topic; either that topic has demonstrated...
Click to read more »as a standalone article. A merge to the parent company makes a future spinout easier, if encyclopedic content about the business unit is extensive enough...
Click to read more »deletions. TTN (talk) 22:57, 14 September 2008 (UTC) Delete and/or Redirect; spinouts happen because of WP:SIZE issues, which is obviously not the case here...
Click to read more »Ritzman (talk) 01:06, 26 January 2011 (UTC) Keep Perfectly acceptable spinout article to keep Werewolf: The Apocalypse from growing too large. Edward321...
Click to read more »In my arbitrary judgement this is not a long enough list to warrant a spinout. Aspirex (talk) 05:29, 12 May 2026 (UTC) Delete: This isn't well-written...
Click to read more »article, not in a standalone article; it is WP:TOOSOON to determine if a WP:SPINOUT a la Russian submarine Kursk explosion is valid, and if it becomes valid...
Click to read more »User:Lukeno94 (thank you), it appears this an incorrectly named and poorly sourced spinout list article that can best be covered at the primary notable topic. Schmidt...
Click to read more »this content should be developed at the article about the team per WP:SPINOUT. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC) I am also nominating the...
Click to read more »non-notable. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 04:33, 26 April 2025 (UTC) Delete - Non-notable spinout of a topic that is, itself, non-notable. Completely unsourced and fails...
Click to read more »WesleyDodds (talk) 02:13, 5 August 2009 (UTC) Keep Perfectly acceptable spinout article to keep the main article from growing too long. Edward321 (talk)...
Click to read more »After reading the Talk page, it seems as though it is a (incompleated) spinout from the Parent Article. IMO, the Embedded list does muck up the Article...
Click to read more »precedent!" When episode lists are too long to fit in the main article, a spinout article is the standard way to do things. This list the ratings for each...
Click to read more »bibliographies of cookbooks or cookery this might be justified as a legitimate spinout or daughter list of the main list of cookbooks or bibliography of cookery...
Click to read more »uhhh... A Traintalk 22:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC) Delete - Appears to be a spinout from an article that doesn't exist, consisting entirely of content that...
Click to read more »here. Savidan 20:55, 17 July 2009 (UTC) Keep as an apparently notable spinout of Dragonlance or, failing that, merge the content back into an appropriate...
Click to read more »reception, or anything that would require separate pages per WP:SIZE, WP:SPINOUT, WP:SS or WP:SIZESPLIT. So mainly as for being unnecessarily split, it's...
Click to read more »I am setting this up as a redirect. This will also facilitate article spinout if Michael Schmidt is correct. Any concerns or comments about this close...
Click to read more »are free to start a draft using some or all of the merged content, but a spinout discussion on the target's Talk page may be more productive. Owen× ☎ 17:45...
Click to read more »selected researchers, especially early-career, Māori, and Pasifika, and spinout companies as time and media coverage in independent sources allows. Updated...
Click to read more »Imzadi 1979 → 18:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC) Keep, largely because this was a spinout from a ridiculously long list of unused highways for the entire US, which...
Click to read more »Merge would also be fine, but there is sufficient source material that a spinout would be needed eventually anyway. - 2/0 (formerly Eldereft) (cont.) 15:31...
Click to read more »article. Won't all fit nicely in the main article, so valid content is spinout to a side article. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/almanac-gibraltar/ Gibraltar...
Click to read more »the Raja Ganesha page, and when there is enough of it, then you can WP:SPINOUT. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC) Keep. Raja Ganesha did...
Click to read more »this one here). So long as that parent article exists, this year-specific spinout article is acceptable under long-standing community practice. NewYorkActuary...
Click to read more »America1000 05:37, 6 March 2017 (UTC) Keep – A valid and functional WP:SPINOUT and WP:SPINOFF of the Occupy Wall Street article (e.g. see Occupy Wall...
Click to read more »Anyone is welcome to develop a draft with better sourcing for a future spinout from the target. Owen× ☎ 21:10, 29 July 2025 (UTC) [Hide this box] New...
Click to read more »C-17 article, or blown up and restarted as Boeing BC-17 if it's to be a spinout. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:44, 10 March 2013 (UTC) Delete, seems...
Click to read more »merge proposal could be in order, but the article sounds as a legitimate spinout. Cavarrone 13:39, 26 September 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »the GNG by itself (though the sources are pretty close), but I believe spinout articles like this should be organized by what works best for the topic...
Click to read more »current article state doesn't justify a stand-alone article either (WP:SPINOUT). – sgeureka t•c 11:20, 23 March 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »above, I think we have plenty for an article. I'd call this a reasonable spinout of Responsibility_for_the_September_11_attacks#Saudi_Arabia rather than...
Click to read more »Cosheaf should be merged. DraftSpace should not be used for drafting spinouts if the spinout is not already a significant section in the parent article. --SmokeyJoe...
Click to read more »main article. Imaginatorium (talk) 14:47, 8 May 2014 (UTC) Keep per WP:SPINOUT, character lists are also generally kept as they explain essential parts...
Click to read more »Keep/merge This is one of many pages about Marxism and was created as a large spinout from that main page in 2007. The topic is obviously very notable and any...
Click to read more »magnitude (length) already provide some illustrative examples. We don't need spinout lists of arbitrary examples for each possible length too. Warden (talk)...
Click to read more »consideration of merging from the history. Draftspace is poorly used for thin spinout topics, but deletion is not the way forward. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:30, 20...
Click to read more »list article, it's easily justifiable as a stand-alone article per WP:SPINOUT. By way of comparison, the only national member of the JC International...
Click to read more »version automatically replace the existing version. However, just as "spinout" articles have sometimes been mistaken for POV forks, temporary subpages...
Click to read more »September 2023 (UTC) Merge into Newchurch, Isle of Wight. Preliminary spinout from the community article. Per sources identified, the topic is notable...
Click to read more »importance to the industry) is inappropriate content (non-notable articles and spinouts, detailed instructions) It belongs to another Wiki (e.g. iosgaming.wikia...
Click to read more »expanded first; then, if there is agreement among editors, there should be a spinout under a neutral article name (not "Denial of Soviet occupation"). -- ChrisO...
Click to read more »articles. If valid information won't all fit in one article, you create WP:SPINOUT or WP:SPINOFF articles. Dream Focus 06:04, 16 July 2026 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »section in the Abkhazia article, and is better presented in there than as a spinout article. But we don't need an AfD to do this! In the future it would be...
Click to read more »establish independent notability. A better place to discuss this may be in a spinout proposal on the target's Talk page. Owen× ☎ 16:00, 24 June 2025 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This is a non notable spinout from List of VR Troopers characters. Both lists fail WP:SIGCOV but we have...
Click to read more »literature and other media, thus leaving no reason for retention of this spinout. As a reminder, WP:ITSUSEFUL is generally not considered a valid argument...
Click to read more »November 2010 (UTC) Keep While the article needs improvement, its a legitmate spinout article from Pernambuco. Edward321 (talk) 01:00, 6 November 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »linked from outside WP. The NOT directory argument seems convincing. As a spinout or table too big for the article it's good, but maybe the issue is that...
Click to read more »be a standalone at the moment. History remains under the redirect for a spinout for 10th... or other needs. Star Mississippi 18:13, 1 June 2023 (UTC) [Hide...
Click to read more »information. Eddie891 Talk Work 02:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC) Keep, per WP:SPINOUT. If there is concern that the Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants...
Click to read more »there is material to put here. Get consensus at the talk page before doing spinouts. SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC) Keep. Notable topic. Expansion...
Click to read more »the most useful entries, his books, from the short main article to this spinout. Books section should be merged back to Richard Brody. —BrechtBro (talk)...
Click to read more »and content is created regarding this event, it can be redirected per WP:SPINOUT. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:36, 27 February 2011 (UTC) Keep or at least...
Click to read more »on the term, the topic being RTLS, and this article doesn't follow WP:SPINOUT and isn't in itself notable. Widefox; talk 08:22, 3 May 2016 (UTC) Relisted...
Click to read more »Redirect to Little Big Adventure, where all the pertinent information is. Spinouts happen because of WP:SIZE restrictions, which is obviously not the case...
Click to read more »WP:NOT#PLOT and WP:WAF. Savidan 17:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Keep as a WP:SS spinout, or alternatively merge per DGG. Jclemens (talk) 21:25, 20 July 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »and compromise, not by random AFDs. Merge to 1999 in UFC events, a new spinout of 1999 in sports#Mixed martial arts, is also possible. JJB 13:41, 28 May...
Click to read more »important aspect of the topic of student life, but not really a good WP:SPINOUT candidate. - 2/0 (cont.) 04:06, 19 July 2009 (UTC) Merge to the parent...
Click to read more »rather unnecessary WP:SPLIT, as the Haka article is not so long that a spinout would have really been needed, and most of the information here, including...
Click to read more »the answer is to summarize primary sourced material, not to create more spinouts without third party sources that don't pass the WP:GNG. Articles should...
Click to read more »catabolism" is small. "Protein catabolism" could reasonably be regarded as a spinout article from "Protein metabolism". Given the lack of info in "Protein catabolism"...
Click to read more »Khgg19 seems to have created these with cut/paste rather than following WP:SPINOUT. Bakazaka (talk) 07:46, 28 February 2019 (UTC) Relisted to generate a more...
Click to read more »"controversal" in highly reliable sources belongs in the show's page, not its own spinout article. A list of soap operas meets WP:LIST, a list of recasts doesn't...
Click to read more »discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 16:59, 28 July 2019 (UTC) Delete - Unnecessary spinout, as the mini-games are not independently notable, and with the good state...
Click to read more »common literary device. On top of that, a separate "List of examples" spinout is really not needed in this case, because the actual Retroactive continuity...
Click to read more »8 July 2022 (UTC) Keep. Both articles are not very small, hence the WP:SPINOUT/WP:SPINOFF was reasonable. Maybe more than size alone, WP:UNDUE was a consideration...
Click to read more »all the unnecessary genderqueer articles -- meaning the unnecessary WP:Spinouts -- has run out. With the Agender article, what we have is a non-WP:Notable...
Click to read more »establishes WP:Notability and all articles violate WP:NOT#PLOT, WP:WAF and WP:SPINOUT. Character lists are widely accepted on wikipedia, and all character articles...
Click to read more »they've won in their own article, or if too big to fit its tossed into a spinout article. Dream Focus 14:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC) Merge to Karisma Kapoor...
Click to read more »general would pass WP:LISTN, and this list is basically just an unnecessary spinout of that topic. Redirecting there, and merging over any shows that may be...
Click to read more »