Talk:Minecraft
 | Minecraft: Pi Edition was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 30 April 2026 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
 | Editing of this page by new or unregistered users is currently disabled. See the protection policy and protection log for more details. If you cannot edit this page and you wish to make a change, you can request unprotection, log in, or create an account. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Minecraft article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Minecraft" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 2 months  |
Q1: Why doesn't this article have more information on blocks/crafting/mobs/entities/mods than it does?
A1: Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, nor is it a how-to guide. Articles should strive to present a broad overview of their subjects. Video game articles in particular try to describe general mechanics and gameplay instead of specific details. This helps to keep the article accessible to readers who may not otherwise be familiar with Minecraft. Q2: Why doesn't this article show the prices?
A2: Wikipedia is not a directory. Product prices should not be quoted in an article unless they can be sourced and there is a justified reason for their mention. In general, if mainstream media sources (not just product reviews) provide commentary on the price of an object instead of just passing mention, this is an indication that its price may have encyclopedic significance. Prices listed by individual vendors, on the other hand, can vary widely from place to place and over time. Wikipedia is not a price comparison service to be used to compare the prices of competing products, or the prices of a single product from different vendors. |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | Minecraft was one of the Video games good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | Other talk page banners | ||||
| |||||
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_%22BIG_GOMEZ%22.svg)
 | The following are reference ideas for Minecraft. Click [show] for details. The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:
The Minecraft mob vote boycott petition is missing the point The Minecraft Community Is "Boycotting" This Year's Mob Vote Minecraft Players Trying to Stop Mob Vote With Propaganda Posters and More Than 220,000 Signatures Over 150,000 players sign new Minecraft mob vote petition “United we bargain, divided we beg”: The 2023 Minecraft mob vote boycott explained After a proposed boycott, Minecraft mob vote faces more controversy in wake of rigging accusations
Barber, Regina; Kwong, Emily; Summers, Juana; Carlson, Rachel; Ryan, Erika (2025-05-02). "What playing Minecraft tells researchers about social learning". NPR. Retrieved 2025-05-02.
Wu, Charley; Deffner, Dominik; Kahl, Benjamin; Meder, Björn; Ho, Mark; Kurvers, Ralf (2025-04-25). "Adaptive mechanisms of social and asocial learning in immersive collective foraging". Nature Communications. 16. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58365-6. Retrieved 2025-05-02. Welsh, Oli (March 21, 2026). "The story of Minecraft is one of the saddest in gaming history". Polygon. Retrieved March 21, 2026. |
Outline article for Minecraft
Exactly what the title says. I propose having a separate article for a general outline of Minecraft. It will just have the main topics, like the people involved, in-game content, and general articles. There is a draft here, which I have created for this purpose.
Originally, I submitted this for review. But it since has been declined. I am opening a discussion for this topic, and hope to get more people interested in this! Thanks in advance! Wikiman (Talk) 20:09, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
- Just would like to add a comment, I've added some links onto the draft to add more content to "warrant a standalone article of its own." I personally am all for it being published and am currently look for more links to add rn tbh :) Atakes Ris (talk) 02:56, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Atakes Ris Appreciate the help! Wikiman (Talk) 03:21, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
"Markus and me" is not a grammatical mistake
In the Music and sound design section, the sentence "That was just a complete accident by Markus and me" is marked as a mistake with [sic]. It is not a mistake, however, since "Markus and me" is an indirect object and not a subject. The [sic] should be removed. MossW268 (talk) 10:03, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.