Redirect to:
This page is a redirect. The following categories are used to track and monitor this redirect:
|
Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. The amount of information on Wikipedia is practically unlimited, but Wikipedia does not aim to contain all knowledge...
Click to read more »allowed to respond to it in good faith. Example: Delete Violates WP:BIO, WP:IINFO, WP:N, and WP:V. DeleteItBaby 4:01, 4 April 2004 (UTC) Keep Wow, that's...
Click to read more »NeutraIInfo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »Indiscriminate Information: during articles for deletion discussions, sometimes WP:IINFO is cited, stating "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information...
Click to read more »incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:22, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOT#IINFO. "The following is a list of sorted tables" is not a promising way to start...
Click to read more »NeutraIInfo (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate ·...
Click to read more »The result was delete. Consensus here is that the article falls under WP:IINFO. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:26, 8 August 2009 (UTC) AfDs for this article: Articles...
Click to read more »lists to WP:NOT#IINFO last year failed due to lack of consensus. Thus I would discount arguments which say it violates WP:NOT#IINFO. Dugwiki 20:07, 16...
Click to read more »did not bring up the AFD because of IINFO, I brought it up because it's not a notable trojan. I only mention IINFO because the OP claimed on my talk page...
Click to read more »reason for this to be deleted is: WP:IINFO is probably the most misused guideline in AfD disccusions, WP:IINFO includes: Plot summaries. Lyrics databases...
Click to read more »February 2007 (UTC) Delete as unreferenced Let me start by saying that WP:NOT#IINFO does not cover trivia and "in pop-culture" articles; that section of policy...
Click to read more »(UTC) Does not fail WP:NOT#IINFO, but does appear to be OR and unreferenced This does not appear to violate WP:NOT#IINFO. That section of WP:NOT is very...
Click to read more »examples given in IINFO, just as it is to say that the list does not include all of the possible infractions of IINFO. To say that IINFO does not pertain...
Click to read more »WP:NOT#IINFO or merge some of the more important content elsewhere.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 07:17, 16 November 2007 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:IINFO miserably...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete. This is in direct breach of WP:IINFO and has multiple issues. If not to be deleted, then please to merge into...
Click to read more »that'll be appreciated.) Deryck C. 09:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC) Per WP:IINFO and WP:NOTTRAVEL – These seem far more about being a flight booker or guidebook...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Delete per WP:IINFO StaticGull Talk 14:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Delete Carbon copy to two articles...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTHOWTO, WP:IINFO. Tagged for sources and cleanup since 2010. Deprodded without comment. Ten...
Click to read more »Doc Sigma (wait, what?) 15:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. - Anas Talk? 16:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Zouavman Le...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete. This is in direct breach of WP:IINFO and has multiple issues. If not to be deleted, then please to merge into...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO Merge to main article on digimon Soxwon (talk) 04:23, 23 November 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »useful, it has no place for encyclopedia, especially when it violates WP:IINFO. George Ho (talk) 17:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »2009 (UTC) strong keep First of all WP:IINFO is probably the most misused guideline in AfD disccusions, WP:IINFO includes: Plot summaries. Lyrics databases...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO Merge into existing article on digimon Soxwon (talk) 04:30, 23 November...
Click to read more »give some context, a complete list of the encyclopedia's content is WP:NOT#IINFO as it's just the contents of the book in statistical form. FrozenPurpleCube...
Click to read more »fails WP:NOTDIR and WP:IINFO, and arguably also WP:SALAT. Claritas § 20:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTDIR, WP:IINFO and per consensus at the...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:IINFO. Unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Eventhorizon51 (talk) 02:33...
Click to read more »under WP:IINFO or WP:NOTGUIDE, but Wikipedia definitely isn't the place for this. Booglamay (talk) 16:47, 27 June 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO, WP:NOTGUIDE...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO Merge into existing article on digimon Soxwon (talk) 04:33, 23 November...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Article fails to meet guidelines in WP:EPISODE, WP:N and WP:IINFO. No sources for tables of information containing results of individual game...
Click to read more »—Ocatecir Talk 01:20, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Delete Obvious violation of WP:NOT#IINFO criteria 4. --Malevious Userpage •Talk Page• Contributions 01:27, 17 May...
Click to read more »per WP:NOT#IINFO. The main article contains an adequate plot summary. Eyrian 20:10, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Delete - per nom and WP:NOT#IINFO. Otto4711 21:38...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO Merge into existing article on digimon Soxwon (talk) 04:25, 23 November...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was Delete as per WP:NOT#IINFO. FayssalF - Wiki me up® 10:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC) List of teen idols...
Click to read more »page page, so it might as well be raised here as well. Delete per WP:IINFO#IINFO Zodiiak 12:12, 13 October 2007 (UTC) This AfD nomination was incomplete...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO Should be merged into existing article on digimon Soxwon (talk) 04:24, 23...
Click to read more »WP:IINFO. Dougie WII (talk) 16:13, 19 December 2007 (UTC) Delete per the nomination on the ground that the article fails WP:DIRECTORY and WP:IINFO. Also...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO Should be merged into existing article on Digimon Soxwon (talk) 04:27, 23...
Click to read more »27 January 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO.--Tainter 03:14, 27 January 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO #4 and probably also WP:NOT#SOAP. --JaimeLesMaths...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per WP:IINFO Gnevin (talk) 00:42, 8 January 2011 (UTC) Delete per nomination. This doesn't...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Simply WP:IINFO, plus title of article is not clearly depicting what the list is about....
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 19:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOT#IINFO. And don't forget List of cover...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) This is just a plot summary, delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. Phirazo 20:04, 18 March 2007 (UTC) delete or Redirect to List of Code Geass...
Click to read more »violation of WP:IINFO and WP:LC, items #2, 5, 7, 8, 10. Tavix (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2009 (UTC) Delete, listcruft, violates WP:IINFO. - Realkyhick (Talk...
Click to read more »Wikipedia is not. Crystallina 17:35, 27 December 2006 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT#IINFO. Possibly transwiki to WikiBooks if they want it. Hut 8.5 17:50, 27 December...
Click to read more »culture" that conists of a list of random references to the work. Fails WP:IINFO, WP:SALAT, WP:V. Even admits to its unverifiability with the passage "The...
Click to read more »there's so little reason we should be keeping this. Obviously its just a WP:IINFO list and seems like little more than a troll attempt, this has been speedied...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - Violation of WP:IINFO. Cool Bluetalk to me 17:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC) How? --Remi 20:32, 5 May 2007 (UTC) WP:IINFO states That something is 100%...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails WP:NOT, specifically WP:IINFO. Leonard(Bloom) 02:44, 24 August 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. This is taken...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO Should be merged into existing article on digimon Soxwon (talk) 04:26, 23...
Click to read more »may also qualify as "an indiscriminate collection of information" per WP:IINFO; otherwise, this may as well be expanded to include top 20 or top 40 chart...
Click to read more »read the relevant policy at WP:NOT#IINFO. Otto4711 13:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Delete Otto's right. Covered at WP:NOT#IINFO, 7. Eusebeus 14:27, 20 June 2007...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) Arbitrary intersection and therefore WP:NOT#IINFO. We have no article about Disney films set in London either. Why not List...
Click to read more »required or allowed. GiantSnowman 14:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC) Delete - WP:IINFO, Listcruft 4, 8, 10.... --Saalstin (talk) 18:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Classic case of WP:IINFO, item 3, Excessive listings of statistics. Just because an external website...
Click to read more »claims to notability. The article was deleted on a PROD because of WP:NOT#IINFO, and then recreated identically, which I'll take as a belated objection...
Click to read more »examples listed in IINFO are indiscriminate in and of themselves; it is their inclusion in Wikipedia that would be indiscriminate.) What IINFO means is that...
Click to read more »Mark Arsten (talk) 01:08, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Delete. Fall afoul of WP:IINFO. I don't see how this is a notable, encyclopedic topic. The complete lack...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO Should be merged into existing article on digimon Soxwon (talk) 04:29, 23...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Article is unsourced, probably not notable. It also fails WP:IINFO as it contains "Excessive listings of statistics without sufficient explanatory...
Click to read more »source without tracking down every single episode. Gross violation of WP:IINFO. Last AFD closed as no consensus. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat...
Click to read more »TWL) In-universe, minimally sourced. No way to source most of this. WP:IINFO, WP:NOTPLOT. Last AFD closed in 2007 as no consensus. Ten Pound Hammer,...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO based on a non-notable connection. Having breast implants is no longer an...
Click to read more »indiscriminate collection of information. It violates WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:IINFO. I {{Prod}}’ed this article two weeks ago, but removed the tag after someone...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violates WP:IINFO. The article is a collection of data without third-party context. It will...
Click to read more »this. — Calvin999 12:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC) Which is excessive per WP:IINFO. All it does is recap the list of #1s for those artists listed. It doesn't...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Verifiability. See also point 3 of Wikipedia:IINFO#IINFO: "Long and sprawling lists of statistics may be confusing to readers...
Click to read more »criteria to be suitable for a stand-alone list without running afoul of WP:IINFO and WP:NOTDIR. The base subject, Plant manipulation in fiction, isn't notable...
Click to read more »per WP:NOT#IINFO) Transistor (list seems legitimate) Shimonoseki (rem per WP is not a travel guidel) Parole board (rem per WP:NOT#IINFO - it's sufficient...
Click to read more »here was extremely lengthy, and quite possibly not in cooperation of WP:IINFO since it really didn't contribute to the actual understanding of the article...
Click to read more »log) Articles such as these were already discussed and deleted per WP:IINFO#IINFO. Career achievements of Dwyane Wade and a page just as this one were...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Out of date ({{update}} is on article) and a violation of WP:IINFO. Contested prod. ℳøℕø 01:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC) Keep if it's out of date...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Extraneous, long list of trivia per WP:IINFO. Almost all sources are simply taken from the artists' chart history pages...
Click to read more »game guide. MER-C 08:35, 5 March 2007 (UTC) Delete Article fails WP:NOT#IINFO and seems to be a violation of WP:NN.Tellyaddict 16:25, 5 March 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 01:23, 17 November 2010 (UTC) What about WP:IINFO, item #3 ("Excessive listing of statistics")? Ipsign (talk) 11:13, 23 November...
Click to read more »Link to the Past (talk) 18:46, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Delete - Violation of WP:IINFO. Cool Bluetalk to me 21:30, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Delete as mostly OR and excessive...
Click to read more »Main article contains a plot summary. WP:NOT#IINFO#7. Jay32183 05:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC) WP:NOT#IINFO,7 states "Wikipedia articles on published works...
Click to read more »List is maybe 1% complete at best, and completing it would make it WP:IINFO. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:20...
Click to read more »fails WP:IINFO, as do many of these lists. Claritas § 18:35, 9 June 2010 (UTC) Comment. Could you be a bit more specific as to how it fails WP:IINFO? In my...
Click to read more »(talk) 15:24, 21 January 2016 (UTC) Delete, plus comment – I agree it's WP:IINFO. About merging it into List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and...
Click to read more »result was Keep, such a common ethnicity means the article escapes WP:NOT#IINFO ELIMINATORJR 18:09, 4 September 2007 (UTC) List of Russian Americans (edit |...
Click to read more »this can be added [1] [2] [3] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki iinfo update 2018 (talk • contribs) 07:09, 23 July 2018 (UTC) Same problem. Two...
Click to read more »but it seems to be an unnecessary content fork. I also sense a bit of WP:IINFO. Erpert (let's talk about it) 06:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC) Why the creator...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO. Full of WP:OR due to an utter lack of sourcing. No other province or territory...
Click to read more »briefly, are listed without any attempt to summarise them which is against WP:IINFO. The listing also includes original research since services are claimed...
Click to read more »article should be deleted because it is WP:LISTCRUFT ,violates the policy, WP:IINFO, has only one source which is a dead link which makes it unsourced,and was...
Click to read more »Article that is per se incorrect should be deleted. Article violates WP:IINFO as it contains "excessive listings of statistics" but it does not "contain...
Click to read more »listing of election candidates, thus failing WP:IINFO Stfg (talk) 01:19, 29 March 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:IINFO and not notable or useful.--DThomsen8 (talk)...
Click to read more »the award is not the same as Billboard's yearly number-one lists. WP:NOT#IINFO comes to mind here. The info can be easily placed in the main Billboard...
Click to read more »that isn't useful in understanding the works in question. Agree that WP:IINFO applies here. JulesH (talk) 20:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC) Delete beyond the...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) Unencyclopedic; simply a list of facts which violates WP:IINFO –Dream out loud (talk) 16:36, 20 July 2008 (UTC) Strong Keep - This is an...
Click to read more »--Crazy4metallica (talk) 00:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:NOT#IINFO. It's not so much whether wrestling is a sport or not (and frankly JIP,...
Click to read more »for the results of a domestic football season, thus a violation of WP:NOT#IINFO. Content is sufficiently avaiable at 2009 NSW Premier League season. Soccer-holicI...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC) Aspects of Neptune...
Click to read more »without any clear rationale for significance fail the definition of WP:IINFO#1. This article may be suitable for creation at http://monk.wikia.org but...
Click to read more »it. Slavlin 19:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - Per nom and per WP:NOT#IINFO.--Bryson 19:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Keep A badly-written article is grounds...
Click to read more »(View log) Council elections for a local town (pop 86000). Wikipedia WP:NOT#IINFO does not house this much info. The Evil Spartan (talk) 14:55, 24 December...
Click to read more »– (View log) The article is listcruft and should be deleted per WP:NOT#IINFO, which states that "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of items...
Click to read more »the subject although you can find sources for some (e.g. [1] and [2]) WP:IINFO/WP:RAWDATA - Wikipedia is not an exhaustive directory of every single act...
Click to read more »Hurry Up England. Demiurge 23:42, 27 December 2006 (UTC) Redirect- WP:NOT#IINFO. Tonytypoon 01:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Let's just IINFO this. Odd. Very odd. Cool Bluetalk to me 23:07, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Keep:::...
Click to read more »arguments for deletion to be convincing. As is, the article does violate WP:IINFO (only because of the "excessive listing of statistics" clause), but because...
Click to read more »occurred, this is not notable in its own right. This article violates WP:IINFO as it's a list of tour dates that never occurred with a few tibits of information...
Click to read more »guidelines: WP:OR (interpretation of what some of these terms mean), WP:IINFO (are these terms used exclusively in the fictional world? what about the...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Per WP:IINFO#4 recipes should be in wikibooks - needs to be transwikied - Tiswas(t) 17:14...
Click to read more »TWL) Improperly referenced, improperly named, should be deleted per WP:IINFO. elektrikSHOOS 20:31, 22 July 2010 (UTC) Keep: It's my attempt at userfication...
Click to read more »Delete per WP:IINFO. Not necessary, and not wikified, WP:MOS issues, etc.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 08:25, 17 June 2007 (UTC) WP:IINFO :) Marcin Suwalczan...
Click to read more »encyclopedia article. — Wenli 02:34, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO, "video game guide". -- Black Falcon 02:56, 27 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per...
Click to read more »Delete all these lists per nom and per WP:NOT#IINFO Ohconfucius 03:14, 8 February 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT#IINFO; same for all these lists of given names....
Click to read more »second time for failing WP:NOT for two reasons applicable here: WP:NOT#IINFO — it is a list of indiscriminate information WP:NOT#DIR — it is a directory...
Click to read more »weights. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Per WP:IINFO#3, excessively detailed statistics are not suitable for Wikipedia. In particular...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) – (View log) Quite simply, fails WP:DIRECTORY and/or WP:IINFO. Yes, I know this was created in good faith and in accordance with "guidelines"...
Click to read more »" –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:09, 26 March 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO (especially point 3) and WP:DISCRIMINATE. Wikipedia isn't here to list information...
Click to read more »User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 18:57, 20 January 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 03:11, 25 January 2008 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »guests across six articles is excessive, the list is unreferenced and is WP:IINFO. AldezD (talk) 12:00, 13 July 2018 (UTC) I am also nominating the following...
Click to read more »Moreover, this does not correspond with any of the 8 items listed at WP:NOT#IINFO. Not overly broad. Firstly, the purpose of the list is not to include all...
Click to read more »00:42, 8 February 2007 (UTC) Delete all these lists per nom and per WP:NOT#IINFO. Just as well it excludes all names borrowed from other languages, but that...
Click to read more »is orphaned and just consists of lyrics. Should be deleted under WP:NOT#IINFO Ferdie33 04:59, 30 January 2007 (UTC) Speedy delete - copyvio, lyrics. So...
Click to read more »WP:NOT#IINFO does not apply to the article's name, instead it applies to the content of the article. An article that violates WP:NOT#IINFO will still...
Click to read more »part of another article but does not meet the WP:NLIST guidelines or WP:IINFO and is based on opinion and not independently verifiable. Raising for discussion...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. RJASE1 Talk 09:02, 10 March 2007 (UTC) Delete- per nom Astrotrain 13:01...
Click to read more »– (View log) Overly detailed info on presidential campaign, violates WP:IINFO, contains nothing important not already stated elsewhere. Contested prod...
Click to read more »Secretary of the Ministry of Defence." It stands in violation of point 1 of WP:IINFO as it merely summarizes rather than discusses "the development, design,...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) WP:NOT#DIR of loosely associated topics and WP:NOT#IINFO based on the most trivial criterion. Pointless and silly list-making. Masaruemoto...
Click to read more »purpose of a list under WP:LISTPURP. Also goes against key principles of WP:IINFO (WP:RAWDATA). Also, inclusion criteria are unclear. Ed Sheeran might well...
Click to read more »and I doubt any of them are notable simply for that reason. (Also per Wp:IINFO.) DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 10:33, 17 November...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) First, it's trivia and a violation of WP:IINFO. (Plus, the respective article already has a good list of the key people...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete. This is in direct breach of WP:IINFO and especially WP:NOTSTATS, it having multiple issues. Thank you. Regards...
Click to read more »log) Contested prod. Non-encyclopedic article, unreferenced, WP:OR / WP:IINFO. Unable to ascertain any notability or third-party information to verify...
Click to read more »"IINFO". --Itub (talk) 12:41, 29 August 2008 (UTC) Saying that "Not news" is just a bullet point of "IINFO" is like saying that even linking to "IINFO"...
Click to read more »From WP:NOT#IINFO: Plot summaries. Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world context and sourced analysis, offering detail on a...
Click to read more »for "Secret of The Dragon Balls" is that they do not conform to WP:NOT#IINFO point about plot summaries without real-world context. Normally, I'm in...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:IINFO CTJF83 chat 05:25, 8 March 2010 (UTC) I moved this material from List of...
Click to read more »Billboard magazine component charts. I feel that these pages go against WP:NOT#IINFO, as they do not represent any of the "main" singles charts produced by Billboard...
Click to read more »(View log) WP:NOT#DIR of loosely related topics and potentially WP:NOT#IINFO. No inclusion criterion, although I assume the heading "List of notable...
Click to read more »not see there is a place for them here in wikipedia WP:NOT#DIR and WP:NOT#IINFO. Furthermore, I would say these utilitarian structures are of even less...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) I believe this fails WP:IINFO, WP:NOT#ADVERTISING, and due to this articles resemblance to a DVD Booklet...
Click to read more »valid arguments for the removal of this article are found to fall under WP:IINFO. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 17:49, 13 January 2014 (UTC) List of...
Click to read more »free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List which fails WP:SALAT, WP:IINFO and WP:NOTDIR. Considering the amount of fiction in all forms which has...
Click to read more »discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 05:43, 6 February 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO and WP:OR — Preceding unsigned comment added by Username Needed (talk •...
Click to read more »Merge - We don't keep track of minor version updates for software (per WP:IINFO); that's not to say this table cannot be trimmed down to keep version, date...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Classic case of WP:IINFO. Utterly pointless and useless set of stats. What next? List of international...
Click to read more »17:07, 7 October 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. Stifle (talk) 08:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC) Comment WP:IINFO is met, at least for the 2008 season, because...
Click to read more »to publish poll results --T-rex 14:16, 3 July 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. Madcoverboy (talk) 18:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC) Delete - trivial coverage....
Click to read more »brings this very close to if not over the line of point seven of WP:NOT#IINFO. Otto4711 00:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC) Keep - Flood's win was significant in...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO ,no inclusion criteria apart from is an fictional anarchist. Gnevin (talk)...
Click to read more »Thanks, Quarl (talk) 01:50, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Delete non-notable, WP:NOT#IINFO Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 01:52, 4 March 2007 (UTC) Delete. per nom. Mystache...
Click to read more »Wikipedia, especially ones that infringe copyrights (obviously) - see WP:NOT#IINFO. Tozoku 19:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC) Delete - totally agree with Tozoku. HagenUK...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails WP:IINFO. Some request applies as the the third series: all included links within...
Click to read more »to this page. The result was delete. Interesting read, but fails WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:NOT#DIR. Dreadstar † 20:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC) Biblical curiosities...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO; just a list of movements that can be done in video games; you can run....
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Delete Oh good lord, plot summary for a soap? Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:A (I don't see a single source on this). --Phirazo 03:20, 9 June...
Click to read more »significance through significant coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:IINFO.—Mythdon (talk • contribs) 07:11, 16 October 2018 (UTC) I would say its...
Click to read more »good intentions, but it fails WP:IINFO as indiscriminate. Juliancolton (talk) 00:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC) Hmm, WP:IINFO doesn't seem to cover this particular...
Click to read more »Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 04:27, 24 November 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. We really need this dumping of Philippino local election details to stop...
Click to read more »discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. Do we really need an article for all congressional races in the Philippines...
Click to read more »edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. in regards of WP:IINFO and WP:NOT. Much of the Keep arguments were rather weak. JForget 00:38,...
Click to read more »by Otto4711. Ariel♥Gold 19:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 19:48, 2 September 2007 (UTC) Strong Delete...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List which fails WP:NOTCATALOG and WP:IINFO. Wikipedia isn't an indiscriminate collection of information, and a large...
Click to read more »a broadcast schedule, nothing more. In my eyes, flies in the face of WP:IINFO. fuzzy510 (talk) 02:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC) Delete aspernom Dylanfromthenorth...
Click to read more »a notable ancestor are not sufficient for an encyclopaedia entry per WP:IINFO. Any general information on the surname is sufficiently addressed by Strickland...
Click to read more »seen as nonsense.Tellyaddict 17:44, 17 March 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO (instruction manual). — Pious7TalkContribs 18:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »above.--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 00:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. Soap opera fandom knows no bounds! Only of trivial interest, and should...
Click to read more »list of examples of every conceivable length contrary to the spirit of WP:IINFO. The article titles are quite misleading and so should not be retained as...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:IINFO CTJF83 chat 05:26, 8 March 2010 (UTC) I moved this material from List of...
Click to read more »(View log) Violates WP:NOT#DIR of loosely associated topics and WP:NOT#IINFO. Stupid examples from this list include; "40 Below Summer", "The Futureheads"...
Click to read more »tabulation of sports results (WP:NOT#STATS, WP:NOT#NEWS, or simply generally WP:IINFO), lacking any WP:SECONDARY source information interpreting or evaluating...
Click to read more »very non-encyclopedic. Belongs on a fan site. Seems to fall in the WP:NOT#IINFO criteria. Maybe WP:NOT needs a new category called "Episode guide" in addition...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Unencyclopedic; WP:IINFO; more properly done by directing reader to official coverage webpage Cybercobra...
Click to read more »My view is that this is just WP:LISTCRUFT and it fails number 3 on WP:IINFO - given that the list in incomplete and already extremely long, it can never...
Click to read more »Delete This falls well withing WP:IINFO because it is an indiscriminate collection of complete nonsense. WP:IINFO applies as much to project space as...
Click to read more »predictive text for years? Nancy talk 16:52, 3 January 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. Almost meets speedy deletion criterion db-corp but doesn't concentrate...
Click to read more »iMatthew talk • take my poll at 01:23, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. A very trivial intersection of age by occupation. I wouldn't even consider...
Click to read more »news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:IINFO. The list is non-encyclopedic. It contains almost infinite number of activities...
Click to read more »reasons why the this article should be deleted WP:NOT#SOAP point 2; WP:NOT#IINFO point 5; and WP:N "A notable topic has been the subject of at least one...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Wikipedia articles are not plot summaries, per WP:NOT#IINFO. The main article contains an adequate plot summary. --Eyrian 19:39, 23...
Click to read more »tabulation of sports results (WP:NOT#STATS, WP:NOT#NEWS, or simply generally WP:IINFO), lacking any WP:SECONDARY source information interpreting or evaluating...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) I believe this fails WP:IINFO, WP:NOT#ADVERTISING, and due to this articles resemblance to a DVD Booklet...
Click to read more »characters. Most of the content is {{inuniverse}} plot summary and trivia: NOT#IINFO refers. If this stays, can the closer please mark WP:WAF as {{disputed}}...
Click to read more »talk.contribs 04:53, 18 April 2009 (UTC) I think you need to reread WP:IINFO. The article is not a plot summary, does not contain lyrics, a statistic...
Click to read more »information there is already at God of War (series). Definately not WP:NOT#IINFO. Better suited to a fan page. Thebladesofchaos (talk) 07:33, 5 July 2011...
Click to read more »list, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, see wp:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT. Interesting only to those who created the...
Click to read more »secondary sources to give real-world context, the article fails WP:NOT#IINFO#7. Jay32183 20:53, 2 May 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved as...
Click to read more »is not an indiscriminate guide of lawn tennis clubs" to WP:NOT. Let's WP:IINFO this. Cool Bluetalk to me 23:11, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Delete just a list....
Click to read more »merge it into the main article doesn't make sense. Definitely fails WP:NOT#IINFO. - eo (talk) 17:51, 26 May 2008 (UTC) What is the harm in giving more information...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO. Just because this musician has given few concerts and has shyed away from...
Click to read more »discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:33, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOT#IINFO, WP:NOT#DIR. Sandstein 21:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO. Just creating a trivia list for the sake of it. Next week; List of spectacle-wearing...
Click to read more »merge with furry fandom per WP:IINFO. -badmachine 01:57, 5 May 2012 (UTC) 'indiscriminate' is pretty vague, so WP:IINFO (aka WHIM) limits its list of unsuitable...
Click to read more »Static Universe talk|edits 22:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. Black Falcon 01:59, 2 February 2007 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Montreal (talk) 06:50, 8 November 2015 (UTC) Delete. This seems to fail WP:IINFO as a random collection of unrelated topics. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:35...
Click to read more »June 2013 (UTC) Delete or Transwiki The article fails WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:IINFO. It looks like it was ripped straight from [travel.state.gov]. If not deleted...
Click to read more »September 2009 (UTC) Strong delete per reasons already cited and WP:NOT#IINFO. Smartse (talk) 19:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »nom. MER-C 09:02, 29 November 2006 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:V and WP:NOT#IINFO so non-notable. Jayden54 10:57, 29 November 2006 (UTC) Delete per above...
Click to read more »tabulation of sports results (WP:NOT#STATS, WP:NOT#NEWS, or simply generally WP:IINFO), lacking any WP:SECONDARY source information interpreting or evaluating...
Click to read more »a list. Otto4711 22:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC) Weak delete - per WP:NOT#IINFO. I could see this type of list being potentially useful to someone (that's...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails WP:NOT (WP:IINFO). I don't see why this page was needed in the first place. Leonard(Bloom)...
Click to read more »Consensus is that this list is not independently notable and fails WP:NOT#IINFO. Sandstein (talk) 15:02, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Virgin Atlantic Airways Fleet...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO Merge into existing article on digimon Soxwon (talk) 04:35, 23 November...
Click to read more »place for game guide content Corpx 02:52, 20 August 2007 (UTC) Delte WP:NOT#IINFO, specifically game guide content. 23:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC) Delete - Clear...
Click to read more »WP:NOT. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio) 18:41, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Delete as IINFO. — Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 22:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Delete. Listcruft....
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO, and no sources. WP:V is difficult here. h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h...
Click to read more »Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom and per WP:IINFO Nick-D (talk) 08:54, 6 August 2009 (UTC) Delete per nom, this belongs in...
Click to read more »article), repeated info already found in Ace of Base discography. Fails WP:NOT#IINFO at the very least. eo (talk) 23:43, 25 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »list appears to be original research and a violation of WP:DIRECTORY/WP:IINFO. Jfire (talk) 04:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom. The article DJ Sharpnel...
Click to read more »- I guess, per nom. Just doesn't assert encyclopedic notability, WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:N. Can't find much of relevance elsewhere. Moreschi Talk 20:41, 4...
Click to read more »directly to the sites. Tarinth 17:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC) Delete - WP:NOT#IINFO. Tonytypoon 20:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC) Delete just a list of links, form...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO Instruction manuals. While Wikipedia has descriptions of people, places...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:21, 11 April 2007 (UTC) Aspects of Mars (edit |...
Click to read more »duplicated elsewhere. Krimpet 23:40, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOT#IINFO. Axem Titanium 23:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC) Delete An indiscriminant collection...
Click to read more »unmaintainable list Yngvarr (t) (c) 23:28, 17 September 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:IINFO. Does not belong on Wikipedia. Not encyclopedic. i said 00:00, 18 September...
Click to read more »their way up or down from number one. Something like this fails WP:NOT#IINFO in my opinion... why not a list of number-seven or number-thirty singles...
Click to read more »that the community does not feel a list of this nature would fall under WP:IINFO. As such, there is no strong argument for this article's removal at this...
Click to read more »a list of the information on the Australian census, thus failing WP:NOT#IINFO. Suggest deletion without prejudice to recreating a better article. Part...
Click to read more »KurtRaschke (talk) 02:34, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:NOT#IINFO.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Possible...
Click to read more »the article should be deleted? ~ PaulT+/C 03:42, 1 January 2009 (UTC) WP:IINFO is a policy. Tavix (talk) 19:20, 1 January 2009 (UTC) This article is not...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO, just TV trivia. Masaruemoto 01:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC) Delete as potentially...
Click to read more »unsourced, repeated info already found in Alcazar discography. Fails WP:NOT#IINFO - eo (talk) 21:46, 10 July 2009 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Violates WP:NOT#IINFO, could serve better as a cat. Kwsn (Ni!) 23:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC) When...
Click to read more »entries have an article (in fact, the page is a borderline violation of WP:IINFO). Erpert blah, blah, blah... 04:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC) I think dabpages...
Click to read more »JSTOR · TWL) Contested PROD. Concern was: User essay, fails WP:OR and WP:IINFO. Eeekster (talk) 18:44, 27 October 2011 (UTC) Speedy Delete. Possible copyright...
Click to read more »with a misleading disambiguator to boot. Relevant guidelines include WP:IINFO, WP:GNG. signed, Rosguill talk 00:35, 29 April 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion...
Click to read more »May 2022 (UTC) Speedy delete per A3, also obviously fails WP:LISTN and WP:IINFO. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC) Redirect to List of people...
Click to read more »colours and registration numbers of every bus takes this firmly into WP:IINFO territory, and there is no indication that the company is notable. JohnCD...
Click to read more »so since Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information WP:IINFO... Pstanton (talk) 07:04, 6 August 2011 (UTC) Delete. A minor rival to Dan...
Click to read more »(or smerge) into List of Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip characters. NOT#IINFO refers, written in an {{inuniverse}} style, and little that's not trivia...
Click to read more »Delete Jaranda wat's sup 20:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. WP:NOT#IINFO. --Evb-wiki 20:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC) Delete, While an argument could be...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) This list fails WP:NOTDIR, WP:SALAT and WP:IINFO, because there's no clear definition of what a "cat-like alien" is, and...
Click to read more »isn't IMDB. --UsaSatsui 16:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. - Anas Talk? 16:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Delete Highly unlikely that...
Click to read more »(talk) 07:09, 5 January 2012 (UTC) Delete: The criteria being applied are WP:IINFO and WP:NOTMIRROR. There is some overlap in the missions of WP and OEIS and...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete. WP:NOT#IINFO #7 is policy and this article violates it since it contains no real world...
Click to read more »discussions. —Muboshgu (talk) 14:12, 4 October 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. There is no clear inclusion criteria, why this 6th games are more notable...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) I don't think this list is necessary, per WP:IINFO. elektrikSHOOS 00:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC) Delete. Information is too trivial...
Click to read more »and purporting to create an encyclopedic article out of them. Fails WP:IINFO. Biruitorul (talk) 03:23, 21 May 2008 (UTC) Delete. This is material that...
Click to read more »contributing from L.A. (talk) 11:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:IINFO as an indiscriminate list. Wikipedia is not a dictionary of foreign words...
Click to read more »WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Delete: Not notable. Fails WP:V and WP:NOT#IINFO, as all unsourced and opinionated fancruft about a term that can be succinctly...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) This list violates WP:NOT#IINFO. There is nothing interesting to be said about albums with identical titles...
Click to read more »December 2021 (UTC) Delete - as per previous consensus, this violates WP:IINFO and falls short of WP:LISTN and WP:GNG. Is this possibly eligible for WP:G4...
Click to read more »towns, of which there are potentially thousands worldwide, so it's WP:NOT#IINFO. Masaruemoto 03:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC) Delete, indiscriminate list,...
Click to read more »Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:08, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Delete - per WP:IINFO. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:23, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Keep - Perhaps that the...
Click to read more »listed even if the airline no longer flies there - and so excluded under WP:IINFO. WP:NCORP (which applies to the services of companies as well as the companies...
Click to read more »throughout the year every year. Therefore, it's also a violation of WP:IINFO. –Dream out loud (talk) 22:32, 6 June 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO. Concurrencies are a common feature on highways, including Interstates;...
Click to read more »-Serialjoepsycho- (talk) 21:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC) :Delete per WP:IINFO, and lack of secondary sources cited. Mdann52 (talk) 06:15, 30 September...
Click to read more »tabulation of sports results (WP:NOT#STATS, WP:NOT#NEWS, or simply generally WP:IINFO), lacking any WP:SECONDARY source information interpreting or evaluating...
Click to read more »doesn't mean a Wikipedia article needs to be made listing them. WP:NOT#IINFO, all the way. Axem Titanium 05:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC) Keep easily maintained...
Click to read more »one-time burst of coverage (which seems at odds with the principle of WP:IINFO). Vassyana (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC) Keep - This was a state television...
Click to read more »1 March 2007 (UTC) Delete both per DGG. These clearly stray into WP:NOT#IINFO territory. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:01, 2 March 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »bloated with too much stuff, I wouldn't even put it there. Violates WP:NOT#IINFO. - eo (talk) 14:06, 18 November 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »Original prod rationale by Kudpung (talk · contribs) was that it fails WP:IINFO. For my part, I also say delete per original prod nom. —KuyaBriBriTalk 17:58...
Click to read more »got ignored. Blake (Talk·Edits) 02:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC) Delete. WP:IINFO. I think we can all agree it falls under here. AP1787 (talk) 04:34, 2 September...
Click to read more »established. Pemberton08 (talk) 10:17, 6 September 2009 (UTC) Keep other than WP:IINFO, WP:EVENT is probably one of the most misused policies in deletion discussions...
Click to read more »trivial. WikiLubber (talk) 21:23, 21 September 2010 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:IINFO unlikely to be reliably sourced. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat...
Click to read more »this article is) to WP:NOT#IINFO failed last year due to lack of consensus. Thus arguments specifically using WP:NOT#IINFO should be considered an invalid...
Click to read more »02:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC) Delete Not a lot more that can be said. WP:NOT#IINFO is the only thing I can think of. EliminatorJR Talk 02:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) Someone put this on the AFD log, possibly with WP:NOT#IINFO in mind, so I'm making a procedural nomination here. No opinion from me...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete - it's a list of trivial information, and so fails WP:NOT#IINFO. Biruitorul (talk) 01:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC) Delete I can't think of a single...
Click to read more »information. Hello32020 22:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom & WP:NOT#IINFO.SkierRMH 04:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC) Note: This debate has been added...
Click to read more »April 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. Seems like an indiscriminate list,WP:NOT#IINFO, WP:ATT refer. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC) The above...
Click to read more »formatting and all) consensus is pretty much rock solid for deleting them as WP:IINFO and WP:SYNTH, and due to the consensus shown by the Wikipedia:Articles for...
Click to read more »— JJMC89 (T·E·C) 19:57, 30 May 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE and WP:IINFO. See related discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Los Santos (HD...
Click to read more »GNG. Wikipedia is not a repository for indiscriminate information per WP:IINFO. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »sources; possible WP:VSCA at work here as well. Also seems to violate WP:IINFO, WP:HOWTO... even with a rewrite I still doubt it'd pass WP:N. Ten Pound Hammer...
Click to read more »station's most requested songs of the week. Non-encylopedic and probably WP:IINFO. --Wolfer68 (talk) 07:30, 10 March 2009 (UTC) I am also nominating the following...
Click to read more »has little or no encyclopedic value at all. Also, please bear in mind WP:IINFO.Jetstreamer Talk 22:26, 3 January 2013 (UTC) Delete. The airport's main...
Click to read more »unwieldy and unencyclopedic list. Delete per WP:SALAT, WP:NOTDIR, and WP:IINFO. ThemFromSpace 00:05, 14 August 2011 (UTC) Note: This debate has been included...
Click to read more »station's website - the topic is unencyclopeadic WP:NOT#DIR and WP:NOT#IINFO Madmedea 17:11, 16 January 2007 (UTC) Redirect to KCET. Doesn't seem to...
Click to read more »Delete- per all of the above. Eddie 01:14, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT#IINFO and per precedents. Masaruemoto 03:07, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) A pretty bad WP:NOT#DIR/WP:NOT#IINFO list. Bulldog123 14:05, 30 July 2007 (UTC) Delete as indiscriminate info...
Click to read more »the document. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. Unsurprisingly, most items are red links, and some of the blue links might...
Click to read more »reason that this needs to be a stand-alone list. Absolutely falls under WP:IINFO. No references that show that it's a notable topic in its own right. Slashme...
Click to read more »including the following similar lists: I would think this falls under WP:IINFO, when a mere summary of the hits of each year can in some cases be found...
Click to read more »and the other three aren't notable for their own articles? See also Wp:IINFO. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 08:43, 9 April 2009...
Click to read more »anything other than pure trivia. Please see WP:LISTN, WP:LISTCRUFT and WP:IINFO. I understand that there is some coverage on individual players (e.g. Mauro...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) I believe that this list violates WP:NOT#IINFO and should be deleted. TV channels have a vocation to broadcast all manner...
Click to read more »an article. DietLimeCola 00:21, 21 May 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:CRUFT, WP:IINFO. Cool Bluetalk to me 00:36, 21 May 2007 (UTC) Delete - Wikipedia is not...
Click to read more »list and the material which is not probably shouldn't be included). NOT#IINFO, ATT and WAF refer. When someone wants to write about the character in a...
Click to read more »not serious Ueberzahl (talk) 07:15, 7 November 2014 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO, and because this is a "list" with one item that doesn't have an article...
Click to read more »briefly, are listed without any attempt to summarise them which is against WP:IINFO. WP:NCORP (which applies to the services of companies as well as the companies...
Click to read more »Shellwood (talk) 13:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC) Delete The info presented is WP:IINFO and there's an arbitrariness to a top ten list (why not top 5? top 20?)...
Click to read more »further edits should be made to this page. The result was delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. ···日本穣? · Talk to Nihonjoe 19:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC) Aspects of Uranus...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 06:37, 3 February 2015 (UTC) Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)...
Click to read more »Delete as listcruft. Daniel Case 20:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT#IINFO. Crazysuit 01:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC) Delete per all. Maxamegalon2000 05:30...
Click to read more »episodic, so a list of episodes has no encyclopedic value and runs afoul of WP:IINFO. The fact that the show had guest hosts after Craig Ferguson can be noted...
Click to read more »Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 07:09, 12 December 2010 (UTC) Delete: WP:IINFO indiscriminate collection of unrelated mentions of blue hair. No depth of...
Click to read more »discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 04:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC) Delete per nom. Lugnuts...
Click to read more »with entries that use only the name. Unacceptable per WP:FIVE and WP:NOT#IINFO. Users worried about the main article should know that I watch it and will...
Click to read more »sources are found providing analysis of the book the article fails WP:NOT#IINFO#7. Find the sources then we can talk, don't just assume they are there....
Click to read more »of non-notable masts per AfD precedent (per WP:NN, WP:NOT#DIR and WP:NOT#IINFO). There are an excessive number of stub articles in this category, see...
Click to read more »fictional character article that does not meet WP:GNG, WP:V, WP:N, and is WP:IINFO CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 05:18, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Merge/Redirect to Blind...
Click to read more »not funny. - Koweja (talk) 17:19, 15 January 2008 (UTC) Delete - per WP:IINFO, even the funny ones - this is not the same as a Joke Page, it's just a...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Contravention of WP:NOTDIR and WP:IINFO; many red links or links to the wrong article for non-notable councillors;...
Click to read more »– (View log) The article is listcruft and should be deleted per WP:NOT#IINFO, which states that "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of items...
Click to read more »information - but 4 million viewers for Five seems a bit high), Wp:N or Wp:IINFO. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 09:05, 31 March 2009...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Listcruft and fails WP:IINFO - article reads as original research and the list itself doesn't cite any...
Click to read more »for each), then delete. Although I think the article should go per WP:NOT#IINFO, the information it contains is very well-referenced and some of it is relevant...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO; they're all drummers and they all sing. Not an encyclopedic topic, and...
Click to read more »topic in its own right. Otto4711 16:48, 1 August 2007 (UTC) Delete, WP:NOT#IINFO as this is a non-notable topic for a list. Crazysuit 01:49, 1 August 2007...
Click to read more »Delete no evidence of notability in what is basically an advert; and per WP:IINFO. --Stfg (talk) 16:19, 2 December 2014 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »mostly "keep" opinions that do not address the crucial WP:DIRECTORY/WP:IINFO issues. Apologies for the acronym salad. Sandstein (talk) 09:16, 17 November...
Click to read more »the number of !votes. The key argument on the delete side relates to WP:IINFO and the idea that this list is just a collection of not particularly notable...
Click to read more »(talk to me) 13:22, 25 December 2007 (UTC) Delete or merge, trivial, WP:NOT#IINFO. Sandstein (talk) 15:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC) Weak merge per Tim Ross...
Click to read more »Indiscriminate trivia. -- Mikeblas 12:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Delete, wow. WP:NOT#IINFO. I'm not even sure I would dignify this by calling it trivia. Mangojuicetalk...
Click to read more »–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTCATALOG, WP:IINFO. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC) Delete. Simply WP:NOTCATALOGUE...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List which fails WP:IINFO and WP:NOTDIR. Unreferenced, and no significant work has been done on it...
Click to read more »notability whatsoever. Reywas92Talk 21:53, 17 June 2019 (UTC) Delete:WP:IINFO. Viztor (talk) 03:05, 19 June 2019 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »WP:V, does not meet WP:GNG and is a plot summary thus also violates WP:IINFO obviously. No-where to merge. CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 08:12, 28 June...
Click to read more »costumes Konczewski 02:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:NN & violates WP:IINFO. Besides, I think trench coats, tuxedos, white suits & leather jackets may...
Click to read more »per Talk:Infinity_of_Heaven: WP is not WP:FUTURE (a crystal ball), WP:IINFO (an indiscriminate collection of information), WP:NOTMEMORIAL, the content...
Click to read more »and also appears to be a "How-To guide" which is frowned upon in WP:NOT#IINFO in the Instruction Manual portion. Dugwiki 22:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »looks as if no one has worked on it in a while. At the very least WP:NOT#IINFO. Billboard lists can be good, but this one is poorly formatted and this...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Indiscriminate list (WP:IINFO) and non-notable (WP:N). All redlinks bar three that are non-pertinent Davidelit...
Click to read more »whereas this later version omits the list. Wikipedia:Handling trivia WP:IINFO – Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information (a Wikipedia...
Click to read more »Malinaccier (talk) 03:53, 2 May 2009 (UTC) Delete unreferenced, WP:NOTNEWS and WP:IINFO violation. No indication that this is an article compliant with WP:N either...
Click to read more »Delete per nom Static Universe 15:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. Soap opera fandom knows no bounds! Only of trivial interest, and should...
Click to read more »redirect all three to World Fighting Alliance. These articles contain WP:IINFO, indiscriminate information; they are already covered at the suggested target;...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO. Just pointless. Masaruemoto 02:35, 22 June 2007 (UTC) Delete - micro-classification...
Click to read more »(delete) – (View log) Delete indiscriminate collection of information per WP:IINFO. Entirely trivial list, orphaned, and unsourced. Mayalld (talk) 12:43, 22...
Click to read more »Basically, I couldn't find anything in the articles that would pass WP:IINFO.--RDBury (talk) 05:02, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Go ahead, Web is wide and...
Click to read more »reliable sources--SefringleTalk 03:52, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT#IINFO. Masaruemoto 04:42, 18 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom & ample precedent...
Click to read more »talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) WP:NOT#IINFO: There is no reason to keep this list. It is simply indiscriminate information...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO; too broad and all-inclusive to be of any encyclopedic value, including...
Click to read more »alive any more. —Largo Plazo (talk) 22:52, 29 November 2009 (UTC) Delete Wp:IINFO. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 23:08, 29 November...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:NOT#DIR of loosely associated people. Are Yoko Ono and Muhammad Ali...
Click to read more »care. Family Guy trivia can be deleted from non-Family Guy articles as WP:IINFO if: The article's subject is not related to Family Guy beyond the mention...
Click to read more »with Otto. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 16:46, 24 May 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO; hard to verify; directory listing; shall I continue? And, I know I'm gonna...
Click to read more »violates policy. --Coredesat 08:06, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:NOT#DIRECTORY are a major problem here, which can't be imrpoved because...
Click to read more »04:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC) Delete - seriously trivial. Also fails WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:TRIVIA. Greg Jones II 02:34, 30 October 2008 (UTC) Delete It has...
Click to read more »encyclopedia as a part of the gazetteer, and that this topic is not WP:IINFO. Unscintillating (talk) 02:25, 17 August 2014 (UTC) Bear in mind the article...
Click to read more »navbox as well. MarnetteD|Talk 13:55, 2 April 2016 (UTC) Delete - this is WP:IINFO list of names with no reason why it should be an article on it's own. Mwenzangu...
Click to read more »detail to be included. 野狼院ひさし u/t/c 14:52, 4 April 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO / WP:RAWDATA. Might have instructional use at Wikibooks, but not here. --Animalparty--...
Click to read more »catalog unimportant bits of data and tv show statistics. WP:RAWDATA and WP:IINFO here. Tarc (talk) 15:32, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Delete strange, unnecessary...
Click to read more »this case. 23skidoo (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. Irrelevant information. Murtoa (talk) 03:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »wiki; it does not follow from this that we must keep every article. WP:NOT#IINFO, on the other hand, is policy. Sandstein (talk) 07:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »of online help articles would have been written about it, but I think WP:IINFO starts to apply here. Any relevant information about this toolbar should...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:NOT#DIR; a list of hundreds of locations with no encyclopedic use...
Click to read more »below. Axem Titanium (talk) 09:16, 28 August 2010 (UTC) Delete all per WP:IINFO and WP:NOTDIR. I'm not accepting the arguments that these cross-categorizations...
Click to read more »"Non-notable plot device, cruft, zero real world significance per WP:NOT#IINFO, unsourced, merely a plot summary". MER-C 12:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »—Invitrovanitas (talk) 11:48, 7 December 2010 (UTC) Delete - fails WP:IINFO and the interpretation of GNG given in WP:FICTION. Fæ (talk) 11:52, 7 December...
Click to read more »years or more). Zetawoof(ζ) 19:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. PSUMark2006 talk | contribs 00:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per above...
Click to read more »delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Orphan, WP:NOT#IINFO THF (talk) 14:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC) Keep - a discriminate list if I...
Click to read more »examples as I can't think of a possible singular cutoff criterion. It's WP:IINFO right now. Last AFD was full of WP:SOFIXIT (how can I "fix" something that's...
Click to read more »WP:NOT#INFO. J-stan TalkContribs 03:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Delete. WP:NOT#IINFO. Crazysuit 03:38, 3 September 2007 (UTC) Delete Notable covers is much better...
Click to read more »album/singles pages as well as a discography page. This article fails WP:NOT#IINFO and a lot of this information is unsourced, such as "leaked songs" and "working...
Click to read more »Large list (mostly redlinks) better suited to a category. Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO Videmus Omnia 21:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC) Delete It's even formatted like a...
Click to read more »WP:INDISCRIMINATE. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:37, 1 January 2023 (UTC) Delete as WP:IINFO. Agree this isn't a defining trait for a list. Shooterwalker (talk) 18:00...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:IINFO, no indication of independent notability. We don't have articles for covers...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO, this is a more common technique than the list implies. The first few films...
Click to read more »clearly applies. SwisterTwister talk 16:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC) Delete - WP:IINFO and WP:SPA - Majority of the article has been written by two users whose...
Click to read more »airline, are listed without any attempt to summarise them which is against WP:IINFO. WP:NCORP (which applies to the services of companies as well as the companies...
Click to read more »needs improvement. Mr RD (talk) 14:20, 19 May 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. Non-encyclopedic subject. Maduwanwela (talk) 15:58, 20 May 2015 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:IINFO #1 as this is entirely a plot summary. There is already coverage of this...
Click to read more »Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of top 10 singles in 2017 (Ireland): WP:IINFO and the arbitrariness of a top ten list when lists of number ones already...
Click to read more »1 February 2008 (UTC) Delete, absolutely, per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY, WP:NOT#IINFO, WP:NOT#MIRROR, and probably lots of other things that WP is NOT. • Anakin...
Click to read more »Saikokira 00:26, 6 August 2007 (UTC) Delete Per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY and WP:NOT#IINFO. i said 00:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC) delete per nom. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad...
Click to read more »discussed above. --Kunzite 01:59, 23 December 2006 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. —ShadowHalo 09:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »of listcruft so far EliminatorJR Talk 01:14, 16 March 2007 (UTC) Delete, IINFO to the extreme. Krimpet 02:42, 16 March 2007 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »providing real world context, therefore the article fails both WP:N and WP:NOT#IINFO#7. Jay32183 22:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom, a starcruft bizarre...
Click to read more »more general heading.Moheroy 23:27, 11 November 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. Any state modifies its license plates on a regular basis and Mississippi...
Click to read more »WP:IINFO exactly says that lists of notable people who are members of notable ethinic groups are not allowed? You see, I've actually read WP:NOT#IINFO,...
Click to read more »logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT loosely associated topics and WP:NOT#IINFO. I thought this might be a list of sequels to the 1970s post-apocalyptic...
Click to read more »com Toffanin (talk) 08:50, 29 April 2013 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE/WP:IINFO. Perhaps it's time for a WP:NOTGAMEFAQS. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 11:22, 29 April...
Click to read more »channel is not a notable enough characteristic to group people by. WP:NOT#IINFO too. Crazysuit 00:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC) Delete, needless list. JIP...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) WP:IINFO, WP:NOTHOWTO, WP:MADEUP. Most of the sources do not verify that these names...
Click to read more »tabulation of sports results (WP:NOT#STATS, WP:NOT#NEWS, or simply generally WP:IINFO), lacking any WP:SECONDARY source information interpreting or evaluating...
Click to read more »or, if there isn't any salvageable content, Delete. Can fall under WP:IINFO. --TL22 (talk) 01:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC) Delete. No salvageable content...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article seems like a violation of WP:IINFO. I do not see the significance in the length of less than one mile, and...
Click to read more »websites also makes this a borderline case of WP:NOTDIRECTORY. As per WP:IINFO, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Spiderone...
Click to read more »Punkmorten 00:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Delete again, thank heavens for WP:NOT#IINFO, which catches this one Ohconfucius 14:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:TRIVIA...
Click to read more »Delete NN magazine. TJ Spyke 06:20, 28 December 2006 (UTC) Delete- WP:NOT#IINFO Tonytypoon 08:29, 28 December 2006 (UTC) Delete per above. Fails WP:WEB...
Click to read more »per nom. --MaNeMeBasat 15:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO. This is a list of all names which are used by as firstnames by Espanophones...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:LISTN. Delete per WP:IINFO. Of the twenty-eight items on the list, twenty-one are not actually between...
Click to read more »impossible scale. — Timneu22 · talk 19:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC) Delete WP:IINFO the last entry is "and many others..." CTJF83 chat 20:51, 20 January 2011...
Click to read more »plot articles like this also fail to meet the specific definition of WP:IINFO#1. Previous PROD removed so raising for wider discussion. Fæ (talk) 10:00...
Click to read more »discussions. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:12, 19 September 2020 (UTC) Delete - Per WP:IINFO. Maybe merge into the parent article, but the table needs to be a lot terser...
Click to read more »song [1] Bulldog123 13:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC) Strong delete per WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:NOT#DIR, non-notable juncture. And for leaving out "Thunderbird"...
Click to read more »IslaySolomon | talk 15:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Delete per nom, violates WP:NOT#IINFO. The ONLY G-hit referencing this fellow is the Twelve Apostles Wikipedia...
Click to read more »salvaged into something else. Coren 15:50, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:IINFO is policy. Cool Bluetalk to me 16:13, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Delete and merge...
Click to read more »to List of Donald Duck universe characters, but the character fails WP:IINFO in that article. Stefan2 (talk) 16:49, 25 October 2014 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »information. Nick-D (talk) 04:59, 25 November 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC) Delete per nom. Lugnuts...
Click to read more »--Nenyedi TalkDeeds@ 02:05, 16 August 2007 (UTC) Strong delete per WP:IINFO. Pitiful "pop culture" list. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter...
Click to read more »places might be located thrown in for good measure. Fails point 1 of WP:IINFO as it does not discuss "the development, design, reception, significance...
Click to read more »data dumnp. Punkmorten 11:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC) Delete - Violation of WP:IINFO, even though it's not specifically listed. Cool Bluetalk to me 12:17, 5...
Click to read more »though I don't think GNG is relevant or helpful here. More a case of WP:IINFO, because information on individual game show episodes is really subtrivial...
Click to read more »images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Does not meet WP:LISTN. Delete per WP:IINFO. Paisarepa 03:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »incorrect. Nate • (chatter) 19:53, 1 August 2018 (UTC) Delete per NOTDIR and IINFO. Entries don't seem like they'll become notable. Enterprisey (talk!) 20:50...
Click to read more »WP:What Wikipedia is not (see especially WP:NOTDIR, WP:LINKFARM and WP:IINFO), as well as site-wide guidelines, like WP:Spam, WP:Conflict of interest...
Click to read more »17:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Delete - Per JJL, WP:OR, WP:NEO, WP:V, and WP:IINFO. I think the author gets an 'F' for violations of those policies and guidelines...
Click to read more »Organizations and New Jersey. S0091 (talk) 23:31, 23 April 2022 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:OR. Article is almost all unreferenced, with the only sourcesoccurring...
Click to read more »Agreed. Kevinbrogers (talk) 22:55, 24 November 2010 (UTC) Delete fails WP:IINFO#1 as would any other plot-only article failing to address GNG outside of...
Click to read more »addition to WP:NOTDIR, I would argue that this type of page also fails WP:IINFO for being an indiscriminate listing of numbers without any encyclopedic...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Violation of WP:IINFO, little notability, no reliable references. ℳøℕø 04:40, 25 April 2010 (UTC)...
Click to read more »Doc Strange 16:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)` Delete; WP:NOT#DIR and WP:NOT#IINFO. Masaruemoto 01:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »played for Huntsville in its 26 seasons so far would be pointless anyway. WP:IINFO covers this one, and it's a "K". Mandsford 01:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)...
Click to read more »article on Usage share of browser display resolutions. Suggest delete per WP:IINFO Karl.brown (talk) 20:55, 25 March 2012 (UTC) Note: This debate has been...
Click to read more »hiring are notable, why should they be listed? (We could go on about WP:IINFO or WP:NCC, but a point is why should who-voicing-who matter to a general...
Click to read more »548 goals scored by Hall. Even if expanded this list does not belong, WP:IINFO Duffbeerforme (talk) 11:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC) Delete there are sources available[1]...
Click to read more »Philg88 ♦talk 06:37, 3 July 2014 (UTC) Delete Fails WP:NOTABILITY and issue of WP:IINFO. --Jersey92 (talk) 17:09, 3 July 2014 (UTC) Delete per all of the above...
Click to read more »WP:V and WP:TRIVIA. Corvus cornix 20:48, 6 June 2007 (UTC) Delete WP:NOT#IINFO. Is this a new trend for articles? It's like an "In popular culture" article...
Click to read more »a Dictionary. SJB (talk) 10:13, 3 February 2008 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOT#IINFO, WP:NOT#DICT.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:27, 3 February 2008 (UTC)...
Click to read more »15 May 2022 (UTC) Delete as indiscriminately large and arbitrary, per WP:IINFO and WP:NOT. Shooterwalker (talk) 23:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »deletions. -- SkierRMH 04:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC) Strong delete, WP:NOT#IINFO, just because fictional things exist doesn't mean Wikipedia must list them...
Click to read more »and crew: Wikipedia is not a directory.") Also fails WP:NOT#STATS and WP:IINFO. AldezD (talk) 17:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Delete. I've always thought...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Fails WP:LISTN, WP:IINFO because the list has no evidence of independent notability and offers nothing...
Click to read more »Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:51, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Delete Seems like WP:IINFO. And there are some very peculiar concepts of "square" in there! :) Warrah...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) To me, this looks as pure a violation of WP:IINFO as it's possible to get. But, it's been live for three years with no objection...
Click to read more »September 2007 (UTC) Delete Listcruft listcruft listcruft. WP:NOT#DIR and WP:IINFO. i said 00:59, 5 September 2007 (UTC) Delete as an indiscriminate list....
Click to read more »Reywas92Talk 23:07, 15 November 2019 (UTC). Delete. Clear breach of WP:IINFO. No Great Shaker (talk) 14:23, 17 November 2019 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 7 June 2010 (UTC) Delete - per WP:IINFO. This is really indiscriminate. Claritas § 10:11, 8 June 2010 (UTC) The...
Click to read more »October 2016 (UTC) Delete Pure WP:LISTCRUFT and should be deleted per WP:IINFO and WP:NOT#OR. There is no way to determine who is "in international fame"...
Click to read more »September 2007 (UTC) Delete trivia, virtually no actual content. WP:NOT#IINFO. Hut 8.5 19:59, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Delete, per nom. Hydrogen Iodide...
Click to read more »albums in 2013. The amount of information jammed into these also meets WP:IINFO. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:28, 26 March 2018 (UTC) Note:...
Click to read more »notability. Bulldog123 16:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC) WT_? Of course delete it! WP:NOT#IINFO applies. Shalom Hello 16:22, 4 July 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom. WP:NOT. --Evb-wiki...
Click to read more »real community? Mangoe (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC) Delete Per WP:IINFO, WP:NOTTRAVEL, and WP:GEOLAND. KidAd talk 00:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)...
Click to read more »makes advertisement, contrary to WP:SPAM. Article is also contrary to WP:IINFO as the article contains "long and sprawling lists of statistics, but does...
Click to read more »views) (delete) – (View log) Failed state legislation. Seems to fail WP:IINFO. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 02:15, 17 November 2008 (UTC) Keep or maybe merge...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Nazi fancruft marked as unsourced since 2013. Fails WP:IINFO, WP:V and WP:N. Merging to Waffenamt is inadvisable because the content...
Click to read more »views) – (View log) A list meant to categorify... something. Violates WP:NOT#IINFO. Kwsn (Ni!) 03:24, 19 November 2007 (UTC) Delete: Good faith, but unneeded...
Click to read more »be deleted because it is unsourced and is WP:LISTCRUFT. It also fails WP:IINFO by being a extensive listing of statistics. -KAP03 (talk) 18:12, 23 December...
Click to read more »clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO and WP:TRIVIA, with no prejudice against the creation of an encyclopaedic...
Click to read more »associated topics nor an indiscriminate collection of information. See wp:IINFO, WP:NOTDIR, WP:LSC, WP:SALAT. p.s. List of Turkish pop music performers...
Click to read more »notability), no reliable (3rd party) references. In addition, article violates WP:IINFO. ℳøℕø 05:33, 25 April 2010 (UTC) Keep Reliable ref for all of these printers...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List which fails WP:IINFO and WP:NOTDIR. Completely unreferenced, some of the pandas listed aren't...
Click to read more »tabulation of sports results (WP:NOT#STATS, WP:NOT#NEWS, or simply generally WP:IINFO), lacking any WP:SECONDARY source information interpreting or evaluating...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Per WP:NOT#IINFO, this article is adequately covered by Category:Psychological thriller films...
Click to read more »(bark • sniff) 21:23, 26 October 2015 (UTC) Delete per WP:NOTSTATS and WP:IINFO. this is WP:LISTCRUFT & trivia not appropriate by itself or in any article...
Click to read more »watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Unencyclopedic listcruft; WP:IINFO and WP:NOTDIR. KuyaBriBriTalk 16:16, 24 March 2009 (UTC) Delete this listcruft...
Click to read more »tabulation of sports results (WP:NOT#STATS, WP:NOT#NEWS, or simply generally WP:IINFO), lacking any WP:SECONDARY source information interpreting or evaluating...
Click to read more »to have number-one song lists for every chart in Billboard amounts to WP:IINFO. If the chart or reaching number one on the chart had some significance...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO and largely WP:NOT#DIR of loosely associated people. Includes virtually...
Click to read more »artists. I'm a big believer in WP:CLN, but if a list ignores both WP:V and WP:IINFO, let it go. Mandsford 15:32, 3 December 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »notable. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. This is nothing but trivia, and not very interesting trivia at that. Not...
Click to read more »incomprehensive. I now believe it should be deleted as per WP:GAMEGUIDE and WP:IINFO. It should not be merged back into its original page because 1.The original...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) See WP:IINFO and WP:NOT#LINK. Not sure if these companies are even notable. Also, seems...
Click to read more »WP:ADVERT Rob Riv (talk) 10:37, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Delete, violates WP:IINFO. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:58, 22 July 2008 (UTC) Keep Satisfies...
Click to read more »(books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Per WP:IINFO, this is a an indiscriminate list of people who claim to have learned or...
Click to read more »(talk • contribs) 08:11, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Regretful strong delete per WP:IINFO. Cosmic Latte (talk) 18:11, 27 July 2008 (UTC) The above discussion is preserved...
Click to read more »that was not considered to meet WP:BLP, WP:LISTN and, most importantly, WP:IINFO. That a player is unwell (especially as at present at a time when his team...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) List of fictional characters which violates WP:SALAT, WP:IINFO and WP:NOTDIR -arguably un-encyclopaedic cross-categorization - as per WP:Articles...
Click to read more »discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 04:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO. PohranicniStraze (talk) 05:42, 25 November 2018 (UTC) Delete per nom. Lugnuts...
Click to read more »FENS · JSTOR · TWL) As per strong consensus here and here. Also as per WP:IINFO and failure of WP:LISTN. The list has no navigational purpose. Also see...
Click to read more »a mass-created article that fails WP:GEOLAND, WP:NOPAGE, WP:GNG and WP:IINFO. FOARP (talk) 18:22, 12 October 2023 (UTC) Note: This discussion has been...
Click to read more »comment added 22:41, 27 March 2019 (UTC) Delete - violates WP:NOTGUIDE,WP:IINFO, and WP:VGSCOPE. Kirbanzo (userpage - talk - contribs) 23:36, 27 March 2019...
Click to read more »generation. However, listing every single parody they've ever done is WP:IINFO to the extreme, especially with the artist/writer credits. The only sources...
Click to read more »think this information might be available elsewhere. Also, I'm citing WP:IINFO. elektrikSHOOS 08:37, 10 July 2010 (UTC) Delete - as most of them aren't...
Click to read more »beverage. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 22:50, 18 October 2012 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO; sources cited do not indicate notability. Miniapolis (talk) 16:59, 19 October...
Click to read more »to cover three distinct file formats to increase the size and so is WP:IINFO violation. Codename Lisa (talk) 01:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC) Note: This debate...
Click to read more »beyond a stub and fail WP:NN miserably as well as WP:NOT#DIR and WP:NOT#IINFO. --tgheretford (talk) 01:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Merge into list of masts...
Click to read more »here. Punkmorten 00:25, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Delete thank heavens for WP:NOT#IINFO, which catches this one Ohconfucius 14:16, 27 July 2007 (UTC) Delete all...
Click to read more »suited to a category (and many churches will never be notable) - see WP:NOT#IINFO Orderinchaos 21:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC) Keep per user Assize DPCU 20:20...
Click to read more »logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY, WP:NOTMANUAL, WP:IINFO variously. Does not establish notability in any respect. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/...
Click to read more »significant coverage from independent sources. Seems to be a case of WP:IINFO to me. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 14:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC) Delete There...
Click to read more »Trivial listing of items only relevant to ingame play. WP:NOTGAMEGUIDE and WP:IINFO --Animalparty-- (talk) 02:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Fails WP:IINFO, WP:WEB given no indication of notability or significance, only single reference...
Click to read more »List of artists who have performed at the Colston Hall; WP:RAWDATA and WP:IINFO. Wikipedia is not a directory of every band or singer that has recorded...
Click to read more »scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Article filled with WP:IINFO/WP:INDISCRIMINATE/WP:NOT#STATS. Only reference does not appear to provide...
Click to read more »2013 (UTC) Keep as creater of the article. Passes WP:Notability and WP:IINFO. 069952497a (talk) 15:31, 12 February 2013 (UTC) Merge to Gangnam Style#Other...
Click to read more »JuJube (talk) 22:11, 8 March 2008 (UTC) Delete because it fails WP:NOT#IINFO and, more importantly, WP:V. The majority of entries are unsourced. If someone...
Click to read more »unreferenced article on a subject that is probably in violation of WP:NOT#IINFO Number 2, travel guide. I don't see much hope of it being anything but a...
Click to read more »This fits that kind of random intersection of topics, and violates WP:IINFO for that reason. --Jayron32 13:54, 27 April 2022 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 00:01, 24 January 2016 (UTC) Delete per WP:IINFO: Statistical information that is very hard to keep up to date, that is insufficiently...
Click to read more »of their portrayal and not an appropriate basis to create a list per WP:IINFO. Anthem of joy (talk) 15:51, 19 May 2011 (UTC) Delete; from a quick look...
Click to read more »are vital to the integrity of the project, but some of them, such as WP:IINFO and WP:N, simply act as barriers to readers. True information is true information...
Click to read more »vague sources, the topic itself seems almost like a very definition of WP:IINFO. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:56, 22 September 2014 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »This concept, never mind this article, is surely a massive breach of WP:IINFO, especially of WP:NOTSTATS. Jack | talk page 16:18, 13 November 2016 (UTC)...
Click to read more »March 2008 (UTC) After a note on my talk page about this AfD I realised WP:IINFO perhaps isn't the rationale I meant; I don't think it strictly falls under...
Click to read more »dream," this in popular culture article is WP:TRIVIA and a vio of WP:NOT#IINFO. Next stop Dreaming in popular culture. Bulldog123 03:59, 15 July 2007 (UTC)...
Click to read more »don't need an article/list for every foreign term. completely fails WP:NOT#IINFO. Blodance the Seeker 12:33, 26 January 2010 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log) Entire series fails WP:IINFO. Every blue link fails. Leonard(Bloom) 18:38, 24 August 2008 (UTC) I don't...
Click to read more »films in which Sarah Michelle Gellar has starred. The article violates WP:IINFO as Wikipedia is not a list of indiscriminate information, and I do not think...
Click to read more »is good, but my main point is WP:IINFO. JohnCD (talk) 16:28, 25 May 2009 (UTC) According to my reading of WP:IINFO, you believe this fails because it...
Click to read more »of in-universe detail from pokemon.wikia. Contested PROD. Delete per WP:IINFO. JohnCD (talk) 10:52, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Delete I don't know what encyclopedic...
Click to read more »article. Edison (talk) 16:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC) Delete per WP:N and WP:IINFO. PROD removed without improvement or comment. Some student dormitories are...
Click to read more »case because they are bare statistics only and so fail that part of WP:IINFO. No Great Shaker (talk) 09:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC) Delete no evidence...
Click to read more »such as Chelsea F.C. season 2009–10", and I concur. Plus you've got Wp:IINFO to consider as well (not to mention the gramatically incorrect title). DitzyNizzy...
Click to read more »(UTC) Delete per nom. Duplicative, and even if it wasn't, would fail WP:IINFO. James (talk/contribs) 22:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC) Note: This debate has...
Click to read more »history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) WP:NOT#IINFO. Excessive minutiae. Masaruemoto 00:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom...
Click to read more »Bulldog123 21:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC) Strong delete, fairly obvious WP:NOT#IINFO case. Far too loosely associated -- some of these songs are obviously about...
Click to read more »2007 (UTC) Neutral - I am not sure about this, but I agree with WP:NOT#IINFO, WP:FANCRUFT, WP:WAF, WP:RS and WP:V Greg Jones II 12:46, 3 November 2007...
Click to read more »listed even if the airline no longer flies there - and so excluded under WP:IINFO. WP:NCORP (which applies to the services of companies as well as the companies...
Click to read more »but argues that the current content fails core content policies (WP:V, WP:IINFO) as well as the guideline MOS:POPCULT, to such an extent that a total rewrite...
Click to read more »protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Per WP:NOT#IINFO: Plot summaries. Wikipedia articles on works of fiction should contain real-world...
Click to read more »content is original research. It is, however, a massive violation of WP:IINFO/WP:NOTSTATS. — Bilorv(c)(talk) 19:08, 7 October 2018 (UTC) The above discussion...
Click to read more »amounts to indiscriminate information and so conflicts with the spirit of WP:IINFO. An article about a single constituency in one general election is hardly...
Click to read more »from what I've observed, the primary arguments for deletion include WP:IINFO, WP:OR, and the fact that the list is too broad in its scope to be a valid...
Click to read more »(talk) 23:55, 5 March 2009 (UTC) Delete This is a textbook example of WP:IINFO and WP:SYNTH/WP:NPOV violations. This is a list of headlines that tries...
Click to read more »entirely unreferenced list of fictional penguins, which fails WP:SALAT, WP:IINFO and WP:NOTDIR. This isn't neccesarily an appropriate topic for a list, and...
Click to read more »asleep zzzzzz 21:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Delete A clear example of WP:IINFO if there ever was one. --Farix (Talk) 22:12, 18 January 2009 (UTC) Delete...
Click to read more »links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) Extreme violation of WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:NOT#DIR of loosely associated people. Some examples; "Abbott & Costello";...
Click to read more »some sort. Tbo 157(talk) 11:18, 24 October 2007 (UTC) Delete - per WP:NOT#IINFO and WP:NOT#DIR. Otto4711 16:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC) Delete, Pavel Vozenilek...
Click to read more »Delete per nom. --JayJasper 21:51, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Delete per nom, WP:IINFO, and WP:LISTCRUFT. Cool Bluetalk to me 22:12, 5 June 2007 (UTC) Note: This...
Click to read more »"rare") but hardly an artist that requires a "songography". Fails WP:NOT#IINFO. - eo (talk) 00:24, 5 October 2008 (UTC) Delete Aside from falling under...
Click to read more »Otto4711 23:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Let's talk about policy then. WP:NOT#IINFO says "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information", not...
Click to read more »propose this list for deletion per WP:NOT, specifically WP:NOTMEMORIAL and WP:IINFO. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of MIR (Chile) members assassinated...
Click to read more »article seems to lack notability and seems to violate WP:NOTDIR and/or WP:IINFO. It also seems to contain original research. Why is it important to have...
Click to read more »--Christopher Kraus (talk) 19:30, 8 March 2009 (UTC) Delete Seems database-ish (WP:IINFO) and of questionable encyclopedicness; would do better to just link to the...
Click to read more »tabulation of sports results (WP:NOT#STATS, WP:NOT#NEWS, or simply generally WP:IINFO), lacking any WP:SECONDARY source information interpreting or evaluating...
Click to read more »and 2006 - all formatted poorly and they seem to fall under the WP:NOT#IINFO scenario. Not sure what the point is, as this info can be found elsewhere...
Click to read more »(talk) 12:58, 18 May 2023 (UTC) Delete all These lists are textbook WP:IINFO, ephemeral and not maintainable (as evidenced by the fact that List of Orbest...
Click to read more »standalone article is excessive. Otto4711 12:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Delete - WP:IINFO--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 12:38, 17 June 2007 (UTC) Delete as per...
Click to read more »