Talk:Maria Afonso

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João

Talk:Maria Afonso

Did you know nomination

Latest comment: 1 month ago7 comments4 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Beta Beta Beta (talk) 15:58, 1 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

(
)
  • ... that the reliquary believed to contain the remains of Maria Afonso may actually hold the body of her infant nephew instead?
  • Source: Rossi Vairo, Guilia. "O Mosteiro De S. Dinis E S. Bernardo De Odivelas, Panteão Régio (1318-1322)" (PDF). Família, Espaço e Património [Family, Space and Heritage] (in Portuguese). CITCEM. p. 438. ISBN 9789898351142. Numa primeira interpretação, entendeu-se que a mesma conservaria os restos mortais duma filha natural de D. Dinis, D. Maria Afonso, professa no Mosteiro de Odivelas, possivelmente abadessa da comunidade entre 1317 e 1318, a qual teria falecido em 132025. Na realidade, uma observação atenta do jacente exclui a possibilidade de se tratar de uma jovem mulher.; Nephew: Varela Fernandes, Carla (December 2006). Proposta de identificação de um jacente medieval. O infante D. João [Proposal for identification of a medieval recumbent effigy. Prince John] (PDF) (Report) (in Portuguese). Art History Institute - University of Lisbon. p. 73. Retrieved 11 May 2026. D. João was the son of Afonso IV and Beatriz and is believed to have died at about one year of age, having been buried in the church of the Monastery of St. Dinis of Odivelas, where his grandfather, King Dinis, and his aunt, Maria Afonso (II), already lay. (this whole source is also about the theory that the tomb contains the remains of John & not Maria)
  • ALT1: ...that the daughter of a king may have been murdered in the church she worked at?
  • Source: da Cruz Parra, Ana Raquel (2017–2018). A Paternidade na Idade Média: o caso de D. Dinis (Report) (in Portuguese). University of Lisbon. p. 110.
    • Created by Jolielover (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 36 past nominations.

    jolielover♥talk 15:05, 11 May 2026 (UTC).Reply

    • This is a new and sufficiently long article. Sources verify the content, but one appears to be a random blog. I also do not understan what "in exchange for her body" means. I see no neutrality or copyright issues. I believe that a hook about her murder would be more interesting to readers. Thanks for writing this, Jolielover. Surtsicna (talk) 07:25, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
    @Surtsicna: I deemed the source appropriate as the author Maria Máxima Vaz is an academic & professor at NOVA University of Lisbon (see [1], [2]), she is a historian specializing in Maria Afonso's father King Denis. For the second part, I wrote it like how the source does as I do not want to insert any of my original analysis. To me it sounds like he did that to have her as his mistress, but like I said, I don't want my interpretation in since it's not 100% clear. And sure, I added an alt hook, feel free to rephrase it if you'd like. I just personally am iffy about hooks about crime, but this one is 700 years old. jolielover♥talk 10:43, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Sources can still be unreliable even when the author is an expert, Jolielover. If she is an academic historian, can we not cite a published, peer-reviewed source instead of the blog? I think your interpretation of "in exchange for her body" is reasonable, but so is your decision not to interpret it yourself. Unfortunately, saying "in exchange for her body" in wiki-voice does not work because it is not exactly idiomatic. Perhaps a Portuguese speaker can tell us whether this is an expression that means becoming one's mistress. Otherwise it should probably go under quotation marks. Surtsicna (talk) 11:48, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
    @Surtsicna: From my experience, sources can be considered reliable if written by an accredited academic, even if it's for a source of generally questionable reliability per RSP. I find Maria to be a credible writer. Also, it's not a blog. It is a newspaper. This section shows all their journalists. There's no reason to believe this source is unreliable. I also added quotation marks per your suggestion. jolielover♥talk 12:16, 12 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
    Meets all requirements necessary to pass DYK, and both hooks work well. Jishara (talk) 18:09, 27 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

    Content Disclaimer

    Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

    1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
    2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
    3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
    4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
    5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.