Six Dance Lessons in Six Weeks is a 2001 play by American playwright Richard Alfieri.[1] It is a play with only two characters: Lily Harrison, the formidable widow of a Baptist minister, and Michael Minetti, a gay and acerbic dance instructor hired to give her dancing lessons.[2] It premiered at the Geffen Playhouse in Los Angeles (with Uta Hagen and David Hyde Pierce in its two roles)[1] before moving to Broadway.[3] It has gone on to performances in 24 countries and been translated into 14 languages.[2]
Synopsis
Lily Harrison is a self-described "tight-arsed old biddy"[4] living alone in St Petersburg Beach on the gulf coast of Florida. As the play opens, she is waiting for her first of six weekly in-home dance lessons.[2] Her tutor is Michael Minetti, an acerbic gay man who has been forced by circumstances to leave his life as a chorus boy on Broadway and to take work as a dance instructor.[5] Lily is Michael's first client, and their first lesson does not go well owing to his foul language and the fact that both are bitter. Each lies to the other, Lily claiming her husband is soon coming home (in fact, she is a widow whose life was cramped by her Southern BaptistMinister husband), and Michael claiming to be married to hide both his homosexuality and the pain of his lover's death.[4][5] As the lessons continue, an improbable friendship develops out of their shared testiness and solitude.[4] It becomes clear that Lily did not need lessons but rather a dance partner, and the pair enjoy time together outside of their lessons. The friendship grows to the point where Lily is playing match-maker for Michael, and Michael is caring for Lily as her health deteriorates.[6]
Alfieri developed Six Dance Lessons in Six Weeks into a screenplay for the 2014 film adaptation, which was directed by Seidelman and starred Gena Rowlands and Cheyenne Jackson.[10] Review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes reports that the film has an overall approval rating of 50%, based on 12 reviews, with a weighted average rating of 5.3/10.[16]Metacritic, which assigns a normalised rating to reviews from mainstream critics, gave the film an average score of 50 out of 100, based on eight critics, indicating "mixed or average reviews".[17]