Procedure in association football to determine the winner of a drawn match
In association football, a penalty shoot-out (previously known as kicks from the penalty mark) is a tie-breaking method to determine which team is awarded victory in a match that cannot end in a draw, when the score is tied after the normal time as well as extra time (if used) has expired (for example, in a FIFA World Cup, penalties are used in elimination matches; the round of 16, the quarter-finals, the semi-finals, and the final). In a penalty shoot-out, each team takes turns shooting at goal from the penalty mark, with the goal defended only by the opposing team's goalkeeper. Each team has five shots which must be taken by different players; the team that makes more successful kicks is declared the victor. Shoot-outs finish as soon as one team has an insurmountable lead. If scores are level after five pairs of shots, the shootout progresses into additional "sudden-death" rounds.[1] Balls successfully kicked into the goal during a shoot-out do not count as goals for the individual kickers or the team, and are tallied separately from the goals scored during normal play (including extra time, if any). Although the procedure for each individual kick in the shoot-out resembles that of a penalty kick, there are some differences. Most notably, neither the kicker nor any player other than the goalkeeper may play the ball again once it has been kicked.
The penalty shoot-out is one of the three methods of breaking a draw that are approved by the Laws of the Game; the others are extra time and, for two-legged ties, the away goals rule.[1] A shoot-out is usually used only after one or more of the other methods fail to produce a winner. The method of breaking a draw for a specific match is determined beforehand by the match organising body. In most professional level competitions, two 15-minute extra time periods are played if the score is tied at the end of regulation time, and a shoot-out is held if the score is still tied after the extra time periods.
Although widely employed in football since the 1970s, penalty shoot-outs have been criticised by many followers of the game, due primarily to their perceived reliance on luck rather than skill and their dependence on individual duels between opposing players, which is arguably not in keeping with football as a team sport.[2] However, some believe the pressure and unpredictability involved makes it one of the most thrilling finales to any sport.[3][4]
Overview
During a shoot-out, players other than the kicker and the goalkeepers must remain in the centre circle.[1] The kicking team's goalkeeper stands at the intersection of the goal line and the line marking the penalty area (16.5 m/18 yards) near one of the assistant referees. Goals scored during the shoot-out are not commonly added to the goalscoring records of the players involved.[citation needed]
A draw is a common result in football. Shoot-outs are only used in competitions that require a match-winner at the end of the game[1] – this is predominantly in knockout "cup" ties, as opposed to round-robin "leagues"; they decide which team progresses to the next round of a tournament, or wins it. Usually extra time has been played first, but this is not necessary;[1] exceptions include the Copa Libertadores, Copa América (quarter-finals, semi-finals, and third-place game), FA Community Shield, the EFL League Cup, and the Football League Trophy, all of which use shoot-outs straight after the end of normal time.
The rules of some competitions provide that a shoot-out may be used to decide placings in a round-robin group, in the unusual event that two teams who have faced each other in a final-day match finish the group with identical statistics, and no other team has the same record. This was invoked in Group A of the 2003 UEFA Women's Under-19 Championship, in which Italy and Sweden held a shootout immediately after their drawn match.[5] This rule is a relatively recent innovation, and for example did not apply in Group F of the 1990 World Cup, where the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands were separated by drawing of lots immediately after drawing their final-day match,[6] however, at the 1994 UEFA European Under-16 Championship, the penalty shoot-out was used in the last Group A match between Belarus and Austria.[7]
Several leagues, such as the J.League,[8] have experimented with penalty shoot-outs immediately following a drawn league match, with the winner being awarded an extra point. In the United States and Canada, Major League Soccer initially also had a shoot-out immediately following the end of full-time, even during league matches, although these shoot-outs differed from standard penalty shoot-outs (see below).
A team that loses a penalty shoot-out is eliminated from the tournament while the winning team in the shoot-out advances to the next round or is crowned champion but the match is classed as a draw by FIFA. For instance, the Netherlands are considered to have concluded the 2014 FIFA World Cup undefeated, despite being eliminated at the semi-final stage.[9]
Procedure
The following is a summary of the procedure for kicks from the penalty mark. The procedure is specified in Law 10 ("Determining the Outcome of a Match") of the Laws of the Game (p. 71).[1]
The referee tosses a coin to decide the goal at which the kicks are taken. The choice of goal may be changed by the referee for safety reasons or if the goal or playing surface becomes unusable.[1]
The referee tosses the coin a second time to determine which team takes the first kick.
All players other than the kicker and the goalkeepers must remain in the pitch's centre circle (see above).
Each kick is taken in the general manner of a penalty kick. Each kick is taken from the penalty mark, which is 11 m (12 yards) from the goal line and equidistant from each touch line, with the goal defended only by the opposing goalkeeper. The goalkeeper must remain between the goal posts on their goal line until the ball has been kicked, although they can jump in place, wave their arms, move side to side along the goal line, or otherwise try to distract the shooter.
Each team is responsible for setting the order in which its eligible players take kicks.
Each kicker can kick the ball only once. Once kicked, the kicker may not play the ball again. The decision on a re-kick is solely at the referee's discretion.
No other player on either team, other than the designated kicker and goalkeeper, may touch the ball.[1]
A kick results in a goal scored for the kicking team if, having been touched once by the kicker, the ball crosses the goal line between the goal posts and under the crossbar, without touching any player, official, or outside agent other than the defending goalkeeper. The ball may touch the goalkeeper, goal posts, or crossbar any number of times before going into the goal as long as the referee believes the ball's motion is the result of the initial kick. This was clarified after an incident in the 1986 World Cup shoot-out between Brazil and France. Bruno Bellone's kick rebounded out off the post, hit goalkeeper Carlos's back, and subsequently bounced into the goal. Referee Ioan Igna gave the goal to France, and Brazil captain Edinho was booked for protesting that the kick should have been considered a miss as soon as it rebounded off the post. In 1987, the International Football Association Board clarified Law 14, covering penalty kicks, to support Igna's decision.[10]
Teams take turns to kick from the penalty mark, until each has taken five kicks. However, if one side has scored more goals than the other could possibly reach with all of its remaining kicks, the shoot-out immediately ends, regardless of the number of kicks remaining; this basis is called "best-of-five kicks". In the 2006 World Cup final, for example, the shoot-out ended after Italy's Fabio Grosso had scored his team's fifth, despite the fact that France (on three) still had one more shot to take. Similarly, in the 2022 FIFA World Cup Final, Gonzalo Montiel's successful conversion of Argentina's fourth kick won the trophy, despite France and Argentina both having one kick left.
If after five rounds of kicks, the teams have scored an equal number of goals (or neither team has scored any goals), additional rounds of one kick each are used until one team scores and the other misses. This is known as sudden death.
The team that scores the most goals at the end of the shoot-out is the winner of the match.
Only players who were on the pitch at the end of play or temporarily absent (injured, adjusting equipment etc.) are allowed to participate in the shoot-out.[1] If at the end of the match and before or during the kicks one side has more players on the pitch than the other, whether as a result of injury or red cards, then the side with more players must reduce its numbers to match the opponents; this is known as "reduce to equate". For example, if Team A has eleven players but Team B only has ten, then Team A chooses one player to exclude. Players excluded this way may take no further part in the procedure, either as kicker or goalkeeper, except that they can be used to replace a goalkeeper who becomes injured during the shootout. The rule was introduced by the International Football Association Board in February 2000 because previously an eleventh kick would be taken by the eleventh (i.e. weakest) player of a full-strength team and the first (i.e. strongest) player of a sub-strength team.[11] A rule change in 2016 eliminated the possibility of a team gaining such an advantage if a player is injured or sent off during the shoot-out.[12]
A team may replace a goalkeeper who becomes injured during the shoot-out with a substitute (provided the team has not already used the maximum number of substitutes allowed by the competition) or by a player previously excluded under the 'reduce to equate' provision.[1]
If a goalkeeper is sent off during the shoot-out, another player who finished the game must act as goalkeeper.[1]
If a player, other than the goalkeeper, becomes injured or is sent off during the shoot-out, then the shoot-out continues with no substitution allowed. The opposing team must reduce its numbers accordingly.[1]
Any player remaining on the pitch may act as the goalkeeper, and it is not required for the same player to have acted as a goalkeeper during the game.
No player is allowed to take a second kick until all other eligible players on their team have taken a first kick, including the goalkeeper.
If it becomes necessary for players to take another kick (because the score has remained equal after all eligible players have taken their first kick), players are not required to kick in the same order.[1]
Kicks from the penalty mark must not be delayed for a player who leaves the field of play. The player's kick is forfeited (not scored) if the player does not return in time to take a kick.
The referee must not abandon the match if, during the kicks, a team is reduced to fewer than seven players.[1]
Defending against a penalty kick is one of the most difficult tasks a goalkeeper can face. Some decide which way they will dive beforehand, giving themselves time to reach the side of the goalmouth. A 2011 study published in the journal Psychological Science found goalkeepers dived to the right 71% of the time when their team was losing, but only 48% when ahead and 49% when tied, a phenomenon believed to be related to certain right-preferring behaviour in social mammals.[13] Others try to read the kicker's motion pattern. Kickers may attempt to feint, or delay their shot to see which way the keeper dives. Shooting high and centre, in the space that the keeper will evacuate, carries the highest risk of shooting above the bar.[14] If a keeper blocks a penalty kick during a match, there is a danger the kicker or a teammate may score from the rebound; this is not relevant in the case of a shoot-out.
Since the entire shoot-out is conducted at the same goal, the crowd behind the goal may favour one team and try to distract the other team's shooters. To forestall any potential advantage, in 2016 the Laws of the Game were modified to add a coin toss between the two teams prior to the shoot-out: the winner of the coin toss has the right to decide which goal is used for the shoot-out (previously, the decision was at the referee's discretion). The referee may change the goal only for safety reasons or if the selected goal or pitch are unusable.[1]
Between 1867 and 1970, the laws of association football did not provide for a method of breaking ties. The first association football tournament, the FA Cup, used extra time and replays to decide drawn games. This example was followed by other early knockout competitions.
In the early 1920s, some charity matches began using corner-kicks as a tie-breaker in order to avoid replays.[16] In response, the laws of the game were amended in 1923 to state explicitly that the goal was the only means of scoring, and that a match that ended with equal number of goals scored was drawn.[17]
The adoption of the penalty shoot-out by IFAB came too late for the 1970 World Cup, whose rules still prescribed drawing of lots for any knockout match other than the final which ended drawn after extra-time (FIFA refused to announce in advance what would happen if the final itself ended up drawn).[33] The technical report for the 1970 tournament recommended that drawing of lots should be abandoned in future tournaments, noting that "this suggestion has, however, since been cut across by the decision of the International Board as to the taking of penalty kicks to resolve such a deadlock situation."[34] In the event, drawing of lots was never required to decide the winner of a knockout match in any World Cup finals, although it was used in a 1969 qualification tie when Morocco advanced at the expense of Tunisia.
Development
In England, the first penalty shoot-out in a professional match took place in 1970 at Boothferry Park, Hull, between Hull City and Manchester United during the semi-final of the Watney Cup, and was won by Manchester United. The first player to take a kick was George Best, and the first to miss was Denis Law. Ian McKechnie, who saved Law's kick, was also the first goalkeeper to take a kick; his shot hit the crossbar and deflected over, putting Hull City out of the Cup.
A friendly cup game between the Barcelona women's team and UE Centelles went to penalty shoot-out in December 1970. The format of this shoot-out had penalty kicks taken in sets of three, with Barcelona kicking three, then Centelles kicking three. After two rounds of this continued to produce matching results, the shoot-out was taken to sudden death.[38]
In the first round of the European Cup 1972–73, the referee prematurely ended a shoot-out between CSKA Sofia and Panathinaikos, with CSKA leading 3–2 but Panathinaikos having taken only four kicks. Panathinaikos complained to UEFA and the match was annulled and replayed the following month,[39][40] with CSKA winning without the need for a shoot-out.
The final of the 1973 Campeonato Paulista ended in similar circumstances. Santos were leading Portuguesa 2–0 with each team having taken three shoot-out kicks, when referee Armando Marques mistakenly (as each team still had two shots to take, and therefore Portuguesa still had a chance of levelling the scoreline) declared Santos the winners. Portuguesa manager Otto Glória quickly led his team out of the stadium; this was allegedly to ensure the shoot-out could not resume once the mistake was discovered, and that instead the match would be replayed, giving Portuguesa a better chance of victory. When Santos counter-objected to a replay, Paulista FA president Osvaldo Teixeira Duarte annulled the original match and declared both teams joint champions.[41][42]
The first major international tournament to be decided by a penalty shoot-out was the 1976 European Championship final between Czechoslovakia and West Germany. UEFA had made provision for a final replay two days later,[43] but the teams decided to use a shoot-out instead.[44] Czechoslovakia won the shootout 5–3, with the deciding kick being converted by Antonín Panenka with a "chip" after Uli Hoeneß had put the previous kick over the crossbar.
The finals of nine FIFA 11-a-side tournaments, including three men's World Cups, have gone to penalty shoot-outs. Some of the notable matches are as follows.
In the 1999 FIFA Women's World Cup Final, also held at the Rose Bowl, the match between hosts the United States and China ended goalless after extra time as well. The United States went on to win the shoot-out 5–4, becoming the first host country to win the tournament.
In the 2011 FIFA Women's World Cup final, held at Waldstadion in Frankfurt, the match between the United States and Japan ended 2–2 after extra time. This time, the United States ended up on the losing side. Japan won the shoot-out 3–1, thus becoming the first Asian country to win the senior—either men's or women's—World Cup.
The 2013 FIFA U-20 World Cup final in Istanbul went to a penalty shoot-out after a 0–0 draw after extra time. France won 4–1 over Uruguay. It was their first U-20 World Cup title, thus became the first nation to win all five FIFA 11-a-side men's titles (FIFA World Cup, FIFA Confederations Cup, FIFA U-20 World Cup, FIFA U-17 World Cup, and the Olympic football tournament).
The 2022 FIFA World Cup final between France and Argentina went to penalty shoot-out after the extra time ended with a 3–3 draw. Argentina won 4–2 against France in shoot-out to lift the World Cup trophy for the first time since 1986.[50]
The England national team has lost seven (out of ten) penalty shoot-outs in major tournament finals, including losses to Germany in the semi-finals of the 1990 FIFA World Cup and UEFA Euro 1996 (the latter following a win over Spain by the same method in the previous round). After Euro 1996, England lost four more shoot-outs in a row in major tournament finals, losing to Argentina at the 1998 World Cup, Portugal at Euro 2004 and the 2006 World Cup and Italy at Euro 2012, before finally breaking their losing streak at the 2018 World Cup against Colombia; this shoot-out also allowed England to progress into the quarter-finals for the first time in twelve years.[56] England again lost a penalty shoot-out to Italy in the UEFA Euro 2020 Final.[57] They won their following penalty shootout against Switzerland in the UEFA Euro 2024 Quarter Finals.
The Netherlands, meanwhile, lost four consecutive shoot-outs: against Denmark in Euro 1992, France in Euro 1996, Brazil in the 1998 World Cup, and Italy in Euro 2000, before finally winning one against Sweden in Euro 2004. In Euro 2000, the Netherlands had two penalty kicks during the match and four attempts in the shoot-out but only managed to convert one kick against Italian keeper Francesco Toldo. Frank de Boer had both a penalty kick and shoot-out kick saved by Toldo, who also saved from Paul Bosvelt to give Italy a 3–1 shoot-out victory. The Netherlands' fortunes seemed to improve during the 2014 World Cup, when they defeated Costa Rica on penalty kicks in their quarter-final match, only to lose their semi-final match against Argentina on penalties. The 2022 World Cup saw their losing a shoot-out against Argentina once again, but this time in the quarter-finals.
The Italians have lost six shoot-outs in major championships, notably being eliminated on penalties from three consecutive World Cups (1990–1998, including the 1994 final), the Euro 2008 quarter-finals, and the Euro 2016 quarter-finals. However, they have also won five shoot-outs, including the Euro 2000 semi-final against the Netherlands, the Euro 2012 quarter-final against England, the 2006 World Cup final against France, the Euro 2020 semi-final against Spain, and the Euro 2020 final against England.
On 16 November 2005, a place in the World Cup was directly determined by a penalty shoot-out for the first time. The 2006 FIFA World Cupqualifying playoff between Australia and Uruguay ended 1–1 on aggregate; Uruguay won the first leg 1–0 at home, and Australia won the second leg at home by the same score. A scoreless 30 minutes of extra time were followed by a shoot-out, which Australia won 4–2. This occurred again twice in qualifying matches for the 2022 FIFA World Cup, first on 29 March 2022 in the CAF third round between Egypt and Senegal, which Senegal won 3–1 on penalties after the two legs ended 1–1 on aggregate, and on 13 June 2022 in the AFC-CONMEBOL qualifying playoff between Australia and Peru, which Australia won 5–4 on penalties after the only fixture in the playoff went to a 0–0 draw. Delays due to the COVID-19 pandemic caused only one match to be played in neutral Qatar, rather than the traditional home-and-away playoff fixture.
During the 2006 FIFA World Cup in Germany, Switzerland set an unwanted new record in the round of 16 shoot-out against Ukraine by failing to convert any of their penalties, losing 3–0. The goalkeeper Oleksandr Shovkovskyi (Ukraine) became the first not to concede a single goal in the penalty shoot-out, saving two of the Swiss attempts, with another shot hitting the crossbar. The result meant that Switzerland became the first nation to be eliminated from the World Cup without conceding any goals (and, moreover, the only nation to participate in a World Cup finals tournament without conceding a goal). Despite this loss, Switzerland beat France 5–4 on penalties in the Euro 2020 round of 16.
The same competition featured a shoot-out between Germany and Argentina, the two most successful teams up to that point in terms of World Cup finals penalty shoot-outs: Each team had competed in three shoot-outs and won all of them. Germany won the shoot-out, leaving Germany alone with a 4–0 record in World Cup finals.
On 20 June 2007, a new UEFA record was established.[58] The semi-final of the European Under-21 Championships in Heerenveen between the Netherlands and England team finished 1–1, and thirty-two penalties were taken before the tie was broken. The Netherlands eventually won the shoot-out 13–12.
Domestic cups
In the FA Cup, penalty kicks were used in the 1972 edition of the short-lived third-place playoff. They were introduced more generally in the 1991–92 season to decide matches still level after one replay and extra time. Previously there was no limit on the number of replays, which led to fixture disruption, especially disliked by the top clubs. Replays were often two or three days after the drawn match, which conflicted with the increased planning required after the Football Spectators Act 1989. The first team eliminated from the FA Cup on penalties was Scunthorpe United, beaten on 26 October 1991 by Rotherham United after a first-round replay.[59][60] A shoot-out was first used in the FA Cup Final in 2005, when Arsenal beat Manchester United 5–4.[61] The following year, Liverpool beat West Ham United in the FA Cup Final's second ever penalty shoot-out.[62]
On 31 August 2005, a new English record was established when a shoot-out between Tunbridge Wells and Littlehampton Town in an FA Cup replay involved 40 kicks being taken, with Tunbridge Wells winning 16–15.[63][64]
Shoot-outs have been used to settle six Football League Cup finals to date. The first was in 2001 when Liverpool beat Birmingham City 5–4 on penalties after a 1–1 draw after extra time in the match. The second was the 2009 final between Manchester United and Tottenham Hotspur ended goalless and was won 4–1 on penalties by Manchester United. Then the 2012 final between Liverpool and Cardiff City finished 2–2 after extra time, Liverpool winning 3–2 on penalties. The 2016 final was won by Manchester City beating Liverpool 3–1 on penalties, after a 1–1 draw. Manchester City also won the 2019 final 4–3 on penalties after a 0–0 draw with Chelsea. Chelsea then went on to lose the 2022 final 11–10 on penalties to Liverpool.
Penalty shoot-outs have been used for many years to settle drawn games in the earlier rounds of the Football League Cup, the earliest example being August 1976 when Doncaster Rovers beat Lincoln City 3–2 on penalties after three drawn games in a row (1–1, 1–1, 2–2) in a first round match. Shoot-outs tend to be quite rare in the semi-finals due to the away goals rule applying after extra time. However, a shoot-out was used in the 2013–14 semi-final between Sunderland and Manchester United after both teams finished level over two legs; Sunderland won the shoot-out 2–1.
The Community Shield is also settled using penalties, following the normal 90 minutes of play, but no extra time. Manchester United have won the shield three times via a shoot-out, beating Arsenal in 2003, Chelsea in 2007, and Portsmouth in 2008. Manchester United lost the 2009 match on penalties to Chelsea.
In 2008, the Turkish Cup Final featured two clubs outside of Istanbul's Top Three for the first time in two decades, but penalty kicks decided the winner between Gençlerbirliği and Kayserispor, the latter having reached the final for the first time ever. After a scoreless 120 minutes, 28 penalty kicks were needed to decide the outcome, and Kayserispor, thanks to the goal scoring and goal saving heroics of Dimitar Ivankov, won its first Turkish Cup 11–10.[65]
In the 2008–09 Greek Cup finalAEK took a 3–2 lead at 89' with a goal by Scocco; however Olympiacos came back from the dead at the dying seconds of stoppage time (90'+6) with a goal by Derbyshire, to force an overtime. While Olympiacos took a 4–3 lead in overtime with a goal by Galletti, the scorer was sent off with a second yellow card for taking his shirt off while celebrating. Later on, Avraam Papadopoulos also got a second yellow leaving Olympiacos with 9 players. AEK managed to tie the game at 4–4 forcing a penalty shoot out.
AEK was shooting first. Both AEK and Olympiacos scored in the first 4 penalties. Majstorovic of AEK hit the horizontal crossbar in the 5th penalty giving the chance to Djordjevic (for whom it was the closing game of his career) to seal the victory for Olympiacos. However, his shot was blocked by AEK's Argentinian goalkeeper Saja. Hence, the shooting continued. Both teams scored their 6th and 7th penalties. Center-back Antzas was slotted to hit the 8th penalty for Olympiacos, but keeper Nikopolidis took the initiative and took the penalty instead tying the score to 7–7. Nikopolidis blocked the subsequent (9th) penalty by Georgeas for AEK but Antzas missed the penalty for Olympiacos (saved by Saha) and failed to finish the shoot-out.
Since Olympiacos had only 9 players in the field, the shooters had to rotate, going back to those that shoot the very first penalties. All 7 subsequent penalty takers for both teams scored, leading to a penalty shoot out that was at 14–14 with 32 penalty shots having been taken. However, Pelletieri of AEK had a bad penalty shot that was easily deflected by Nikopolidis, who then took the 34th penalty shot against the other goalkeeper, Saja, scoring, and ending this saga with a 15–14 win for Olympiacos in penalty shoot out and an overall score of 19–18. (2008–09 Greek Cup).
UEFA club competitions
The first penalty shoot-out in a European Cup final occurred in the 1984 European Cup Final as Liverpool defeated Roma. The match is best known for the antics of Liverpool keeper Bruce Grobbelaar. As Roma's Bruno Conti prepared to take his kick, Grobbelaar walked towards the goal smiling confidently at the cameras lined-up behind, then proceeded to bite the back of the net, in imitation of eating spaghetti. Conti sent his spot kick over the bar. Grobbelaar then produced a similar performance before Francesco Graziani took his kick, famously wobbling his legs in mock terror. Graziani duly missed and Liverpool went on to win the shootout 4–2.
In the 1986 European Cup Final between Steaua București and Barcelona, Steaua keeper Helmut Duckadam saved all four of Barca's penalties, for which he was dubbed "the hero of Seville".[66] Steaua also missed two, but still prevailed 2–0 in the shoot-out to become the only Romanian club side to win the title.
In the 2005 UEFA Champions League Final between Milan and Liverpool, Liverpool keeper Jerzy Dudek used tactics similar to Bruce Grobbelaar in 1984 (known as the "Dudek dance" in 2005) to distract the Milan shootout takers which resulted in a victory for his team.
The 2008 UEFA Champions League Final between Manchester United and Chelsea went to penalties, when John Terry missed a penalty which would have won Chelsea the match (and the Champions League). His standing leg slipped as he took his kick, and the ball hit the post. Chelsea lost the shoot-out 6–5, to which Terry reacted by breaking down in tears. Terry was not originally the penalty taker, however, striker Didier Drogba had been sent off shortly before extra time ended.
In the semi-finals of the UEFA Champions League between Real Madrid and Bayern Munich, Iker Casillas and Manuel Neuer each saved two spot kicks. Neuer kept out penalties from Cristiano Ronaldo (£80 million) and Kaká (£56 million), then the most expensive footballers in history from their transfer fees.[67]
On 19 May 2012, Chelsea defeated Bayern Munich 4–3 on penalties in the 2012 UEFA Champions League Final. Chelsea had never previously won a shoot-out in the competition, and had lost the 2008 final and 2007 semi-final on penalties. Bayern had never lost a shoot-out in Europe; their wins included the 2001 final against Valencia and the 2012 semi-final against Real Madrid. Didier Drogba dispatched the winning penalty, having been unable to take the fifth kick (missed by Terry) in the 2008 final due to a red card in extra time. The following day, many British newspapers made reference to the fact that an English team had finally beaten a German team on penalties.[68]
On 26 May 2021, Villarreal defeated Manchester United 11–10 on penalties in the 2021 UEFA Europa League Final, after the game ended 1–1 after extra time. Every player on the pitch took penalties – Manchester United goalkeeper David De Gea was the only one to miss, with his shot being saved by Gerónimo Rulli to hand Villarreal its first major title. The 21 penalties converted was a record for a shoot-out in a major UEFA tournament match.[69]
Records
The world record for the longest penalty shoot-out, and the highest score, in a first class match is 56 penalties during the 2023–24 Liga Alef (Israel's third tier) promotion play-offs when F.C. Dimona beat Shimshon Tel Aviv 23–22.[70]
The world record for the most penalties scored consecutively in a shoot out stands at 31, in a Vertu Trophy Round of 32 game between Blackpool U21's and Aston Villa U21's on 17th December 2024, in which the 32nd penalty was saved, enabling Aston Villa to win 18-17.[71]
In major international tournaments, the most penalties came in the 2006 African Cup of Nations, where Ivory Coast and Cameroon needed 24 penalties to decide who would advance to the semi-finals. The Ivory Coast advanced by winning 12–11 after Samuel Eto'o missed his second attempt, as his was the only miss of the penalty shootout.[72][73] Ivory Coast also participated in the longest shootout in a final, in the 1992 African Cup of Nations, where they beat Ghana 11-10. This penalty shootout was significant in that it was the first in the final of a major international tournament that every player on the pitch took a penalty.[72][74]
On 11 December 2012, Bradford City set the record for most consecutive penalty shootout wins. They won 9 penalty shootouts since 2009 and that included wins against Arsenal and local rivals Huddersfield Town.[78]
The shortest possible penalty shootout consists of three kicks by each team, with one team scoring all its kicks and the other team failing to score any. An example of this occurred in the semi-final of the 2017 FIFA Confederations Cup, with Chile beating Portugal 3–0,[79] or the UEFA Euro 2024 where Portugal beat Slovenia with the same result in the shootout.
Statistical record
A shoot-out is usually considered for statistical purposes to be separate from the match which preceded it.[80][81][82] In the case of a two-legged fixture, the two matches are still considered either as two draws or as one win and one loss; in the case of a single match, it is still considered as a draw. This contrasts with a fixture won in extra time, where the score at the end of normal time is superseded. Converted shoot-out penalties are not considered as goals scored by a player for the purposes of their individual records, or for "golden boot" competitions.
The NCAA rules book, which governs most college soccer in the United States, takes a similar approach. With the exception of the national championship game, if the score of any game remains tied following the sudden death overtime (or golden goal), the game is recorded as a tie, regardless of the result of the shoot-out tiebreaker. In a national championship game, the result of the shoot-out tiebreaker also determines the result of the game for statistical purposes.[83] Until 2001, all NCAA games in which the shoot-out tiebreaker was used to determine advancement or a champion were recorded as a tie.[84] In 2002, the rule was modified such that all games in which the shoot-out tiebreaker was used would also decide the winner of the game for statistical purposes.[85][86] The rule was again changed in 2003 to match the pre-2002 rule with the newly added exception that a shoot-out tiebreaker in a national championship game would be decisive for all purposes, including the record.[87]
In the calculation of UEFA coefficients, shoot-outs are ignored for club coefficients,[81] but not national team coefficients, where the shoot-out winner gets 20,000 points: more than the shoot-out loser, who gets 10,000 (the same as for a draw) but less than the 30,000 points for winning a match outright.[88] In the FIFA World Rankings, the base value of a win is three points; a win on penalties is two; a draw and a loss on penalties are one; a loss is zero.[82]The more complicated ranking system FIFA used from 1999 to 2006 gave a shoot-out winner the same points as for a normal win and a shoot-out loser the same points as for a draw; goals in the match proper, but not the shoot-out, were factored into the calculation.[89]
Criticisms
As a way to decide a football match, shoot-outs have been seen variously as a thrilling climax or as an unsatisfactory cop-out.
The result is often seen as a lottery rather than a test of skill;[90]managersLuiz Felipe Scolari[92] and Roberto Donadoni[93] described them as such after their teams had respectively won and lost shoot-outs. Others disagree. Mitch Phillips called it "the ultimate test of nerve and technique".[94] Paul Doyle emphasised the psychological element.[90]
Only a small subset of a footballer's skills is tested by a shoot-out. Ian Thomsen likened deciding the 1994 World Cup using a penalty shoot-out to deciding the Masters golf tournament via a minigolf game.[95] The shoot-out is a test of individuals which may be considered inappropriate in a team sport; Sepp Blatter has said "Football is a team sport and penalties is not a team, it is the individual".[96]
Inferior teams are tempted to play for a scoreless draw, calculating that a shoot-out offers their best hope of victory.[97]Red Star Belgrade's performance beating Olympique Marseille in the 1991 European Cup Final is often condemned for having "played for penalties" from the kick-off;[98][99] a tactic coach Ljupko Petrović freely admitted to.[100] On the other hand, the increased opportunity for giant-killing may also be seen as an advantage, increasing the romance of a competition like the FA Cup.[101] Some teams have regarded, or been accused of regarding, a loss on penalties as an honourable result or "no defeat at all".[94]
The Economist reported on the advantage of the team kicking first usually winning and on the players aiming higher usually scoring a goal.[102]
Advantage to team kicking first?
Ignacio Palacios-Huerta has suggested that the alternating kick sequence gives an unfair advantage to the team kicking first, with statistical evidence showing that the team kicking first wins in 60% of the cases, probably because the team kicking second is under more pressure when trailing in the shoot-out.[103] As a remedy, he proposed using the Thue–Morse sequence to determine the kicking order.[104] Another, more comprehensive, analysis by InStat looked at over 2,000 penalty kick shootouts the first to go won 51.48% of the time.[105] However, in the academic literature, empirical support for the existence of such a first-mover advantage is ambiguous.[106]
As part of a trial to reduce a potential first-mover advantage, the IFAB sanctioned in March 2017 to test a different sequence of taking penalties, known as "ABBA", that mirrors the serving sequence in a tennis tiebreak (team A kicks first, team B kicks second):[107]
Original sequence
AB AB AB AB AB (sudden death starts) AB AB AB etc.
Trial sequence
AB BA AB BA AB (sudden death starts) BA AB BA etc.
The penalty shoot-out in the Women's Under-17 Championship semi-final between Germany and Norway was the first ever to implement this new system.[110] It was also used in the 2017 FA Community Shield on 6 August 2017.[111]
During IFAB's 133rd Annual Business Meeting in Glasgow, Scotland on 22 November 2018, it was agreed that due to the lack of strong support mainly because of its complexity, the ABBA option would no longer be used in future competitions.[112]
Alternatives
Other tie-break methods have been proposed, both before and since shoot-outs were introduced.
Association football used the "touch down" (similar to a try in rugby) between 1866 and 1867. The touch-down was related to similar tie-breakers used in non-association football codes, such as the "rouge" in the Eton field game (and, from 1862 to 1868, in Sheffield Rules). In rugby itself, the try served as a tie-breaker between 1875 and 1886.[113]
During the qualification process for the 1962 World Cup, Morocco and Tunisia formed a two-team group. They both won 2–1 at home, so they played the third match at a neutral location. When this ended in a 1–1 draw after extra time, Morocco advanced on a coin toss to the next round of qualification. This scenario was repeated during the qualification process for the 1970 World Cup, when the same two teams were tied after three matches and extra time. Again, Morocco advanced on a coin toss. Tunisia did have better luck with the coin toss in the intervening years; during the 1965 African Cup of Nations, they reached the final at the expense of Senegal by winning a coin toss after three group matches had left Tunisia and Senegal tied with a win (over Ethiopia) and a draw (against each other).
Alternatives include replaying a match that has ended in a draw. In the 1974 European Cup final, the final score of the first match was a draw, leading to a replay being played two days later. This remains the only time it has happened in the competition. Replays still occur up to, and including, the fifth round (last 16) of the English FA Cup. Until 1991, any number of replays were permitted, with a record of five.[116][failed verification] (Since then, a draw in the [first] replay has been resolved by a penalty-shoot-out.) However, it was announced in April 2024 that replays would be scrapped from the first round onwards beginning with the 2024-2025 FA Cup season.[117]
Other suggestions have included using elements of match play such as most shots on goal, most corner kicks awarded, fewest cautions and sendings-off, or having ongoing extra time with teams compelled to remove players at progressive intervals (similar to regular season play in the National Hockey League, where players play 3-on-3 in the extra time).[118] These proposals have not yet been authorised by the International Football Association Board. However, after the 2006 World Cup, Sepp Blatter stated that he wants no more penalty shoot-outs in the Final of the World Cup, tentatively suggesting either a replay or "Maybe to take players away and play golden goal".[96]
Henry Birtles' "Advantage" proposal is for the shoot-out to be held before extra-time, and only acting as a tiebreak if the game remains a draw after the full 120 minutes.[119] Proponents of this idea state that it would lead to a more offensive extra-time as one of the teams would know they have to score and there would never be a match in which both teams are simply waiting for penalties. Another advantage is that players who have missed would have a chance to redeem themselves in extra-time. The obvious flaw is that the team that wins the penalty shoot-out would be inclined to play defensively in extra time in the knowledge that a draw would put them through. However, this flaw is not so clear because a single goal makes the difference between winning and losing, as opposed to a team that defends a single-goal lead more comfortably because a conceded goal is the difference between winning and drawing.
Another alternative is Attacker Defender Goalkeeper (ADG), which features a series of ten contests, in which an attacker kicks off from 32 yards and has 20 seconds to score a goal against a defender and goalkeeper. At the completion of the ten contests, the team with the most goals is the winner.[120][121]
North American experiments
The North American Soccer League (NASL) in the 1970s and 1980s, then Major League Soccer (MLS) for its first four seasons (1996–1999) experimented with a variation of the shoot-out procedure.
Instead of a straight penalty kick, the shoot-out started 35 yards or 32 m from the goal and having five seconds to attempt a shot. The player could make as many moves as he could in a breakaway situation in the five seconds, then attempt a shot. This procedure is similar to that used in an ice hockey penalty shot. As with a standard shoot-out, this variation used a best-of-five-kicks model, and if the score was still level, the tiebreaker would head to an extra round of one attempt per team.
This format rewarded player skills, as players were able to attempt to deceive goalkeepers and play the ball in an attempt to make the shot, as in a one-on-one skills contest, and goalkeepers could take on the attackers without restrictions that are normally implemented in penalty shootouts. Soccer Bowl '81, the NASL's 1981 championship final, was decided by this format.[122]
From its inception in 1968, the NASL used an unconventional point system in determining the league standings. Teams were awarded six points for a win and three points for a draw. In addition, teams earned one bonus point for each goal scored in a game up to a maximum of three per game. Thus, a team that lost 5–3 would earn three points. However, a team that lost 1–0 would earn no points. Also, a team that won 5–4 would earn nine points (the same as a 3–0 win). But a team that won 2–0 would earn only eight points. In the league's second season (1969), the Kansas City Spurs were the league champions with 10 wins, 2 losses and 4 ties even though the Atlanta Chiefs had 11 wins, 2 losses and 3 ties, because Kansas City earned more bonus points. Starting with 1971 postseason playoff matches, the NASL used a golden goal rule, and every match had a winner decided from the run of play. Extra-time sessions were 15 minutes long before a brief break and change of ends. Game 1 of the 1971 NASL semifinal series between the Rochester Lancers and the Dallas Tornado went six extra-time periods with Rochester scoring the game-winning goal in the 176th minute. Game 3 of that same series went four extra time periods with Dallas scoring in the 148th minute to win the match and the series. In 1975, the NASL adopted a conventional penalty-kick shootout system for all regular-season and postseason playoff matches, and there were no longer any NASL matches that ended in ties. In the standings, a team that won in regulation time was awarded six points. A team that won in a penalty-kick shootout was awarded one point. Bonus points continued to be awarded for each goal scored up to a maximum of three per game. In 1977, the NASL adopted the experimental North American shootout procedure described above. If a match was tied after 90 minutes, a maximum of two golden goal extra time periods of 7.5 minutes each were played. If neither team scored, the shootout was held to determine the winner of the match. In the standings, a team that won was awarded six points whether the win came in regulation time, extra time or by shootout. Bonus points continued to be awarded for each goal scored up to a maximum of three per game. No bonus points were awarded for goals scored in extra time. Postseason playoff games were decided in the same manner. In 1981, the number of points awarded to a team that won a game in a shootout was reduced from six to four. This remained the system until the NASL's final season in 1984.
From its inception in 1996, MLS used the shootout system that had been used by the NASL to determine winners of matches. No regular-season or postseason playoff games ended in a tie. In general, no extra time was played; the shootout commenced immediately after 90 minutes had been played. The only exception was in the MLS Cup Final in which a match tied after 90 minutes would be followed by a maximum of two 15-minute extra time sessions on a golden goal basis. In the regular-season standings, a team that won a match in regulation was awarded three points. A team that won a match in a shootout was awarded one point. There were no bonus points or points awarded to teams that lost whether in regulation time or a shootout. In the playoffs, the conference semifinals and conference finals were organised as best-of-three matches series. A shootout win counted as a win. Thus, a team could win two of the three matches by shootout and lose the other match in regulation and still advance to the next round. This was inconsistent with how the teams were rewarded during the regular season when the team with one win would have earned three points, and the team with two wins would have earned only two points. In 1999, a maximum of two 15-minute golden goal extra time periods were added for matches that were tied after 90 minutes of regulation play. If neither team scored during extra time, the match was decided by a shootout. MLS abandoned the North American style shootout starting with the 2000 season.[123] If penalties are required to determine a winner during the playoffs, MLS now uses the shoot-out procedure specified by the International Football Association Board.
In the MLS Next Pro development league, all draws are followed by a penalty shoot out. While both teams receive 1 match point for the draw, the team winning the penalty shootout gets an additional match point, resulting in draws giving 1 point to the loser of the shootout and 2 to the winner.[124]
^"World Cup shootouts are great and here is how other sports can adopt the thrilling finale". USA Today. 1 July 2018. Retrieved 2 July 2018. But all those things combine to make it dramatic and compulsive viewing, the ultimate element of instant unpredictability, a quick fix for both the "short attention span" generation and all the ones before it, too. Shootouts provide all the things we like about sports. Heroes stepping into the spotlight with a single moment of brilliant or fortune. Sympathetic figures who your heart bleeds for.
^"Goalmouth Scramble: 10 'important' thoughts on the World Cup". New Zealand Herald. 2 July 2017. Nothing beats penalty shootouts for drama. And how great was the camera pivot to capture Manchester United legend Peter Schmeichel's reactions every time his son Kasper saved a penalty for Denmark? Truly gripping theatre.
^Duret, Sébastien; Matishen, David; Morard, Hervé; Aarhus, Lars; Garin, Erik; Burkert, Sturmius (14 February 2004). "European Women U-19 Championship 2002–03". RSSSF. Archived from the original on 21 January 2010. Retrieved 14 October 2009.
^FIFA Technical Study Group (1990). FIFA World Cup Italia'90: Official Report(PDF). FIFA. p. 59. Archived from the original(PDF) on 24 September 2015. So the last two matches in Group F would decide whether teams could proceed forward by their own efforts, or make FIFA resort to drawing lots in Rome. [..] Ireland and Holland fought yet another 1–1 result and the draw in Rome placed Ireland in second place and Holland third.
^Hirata, T.; Szymanski, S. "The J. League and the World Cup". In Lee, YH; Fort, R (eds.). The Sports Business in The Pacific Rim. Sports Economics, Management and Policy.
^"En Passant". Athletic News: 1. 2 April 1923. This change is not quite so unnecessary as it might appear, for matches have been decided by corner-kicks to prevent replays in charity games late in the season.
^Laws of the Game (1923) – via Wikisource. A game shall be won by the team scoring the greater number of goals. If no goals have been scored, or the scores are equal at the end of the game, the game shall be drawn
^IFAB (20 February 1970). "Minutes of the Working Party"(PDF). London: Soccer South Bay Referee Association. p. 4, §12. Archived from the original(PDF) on 30 April 2011. Retrieved 29 November 2009.
^IFAB (27 June 1970). "Minutes of the AGM"(PDF). Inverness: Soccer South Bay Referee Association. §5(g). Archived from the original(PDF) on 30 April 2011. Retrieved 29 November 2009.
^Pelé; Duarte, Orlando; Bellos, Alex; Hahn, Daniel (2006). Pelé: the autobiography. Simon & Schuster. ISBN978-0-7432-7583-5.
^Road, Alan (20 June 1976). "Side Lines: Thomas the send-off". The Observer. p. 20. Clive Thomas ... has been asked by the European Football Federation to stay in the country to referee a possible replay of tonight's European championship between the West Germany and the Czechs in Belgrade.
^Lacey, David (21 June 1976). "Czechs owe championship to Viktor". The Guardian. p. 17. Extra time brought no more goals and so, the countries having decided against a replay on Tuesday, the tournament had to be decided on penalties.
^Coyle, John (3 September 2002). "Replays". In Cox, Richard William; Russell, Dave; Vamplew, Wray (eds.). Encyclopedia of British football. Routledge. p. 265. ISBN978-0-7146-5249-8. Retrieved 27 June 2010.
^Laws of the Game 2007/2008, p.130: "The kicks from the penalty mark are not part of the match"
^ ab"FAQ: Coefficients (associations, clubs, access list)". UEFA. 1 July 2005. Archived from the original on 27 May 2008. Retrieved 23 June 2008. Kicks from the penalty mark to determine which club qualifies or to determine the winners of a tie do not affect the actual result of the match.
^ ab"The FIFA/Coca-Cola World Ranking"(PDF). FIFA. 27 May 2007. Archived(PDF) from the original on 13 December 2014. Retrieved 30 October 2014. Win 3 points Draw 1 point Defeat 0 points. To ensure that the formula is not only fair but also simple, matches that are decided by a penalty shoot-out (which are considered draws under normal rules) result in the winning team receiving two points and the losing team one point.
^"New UEFA National Team Coefficient Ranking System"(PDF). UEFA. 20 May 2008. p. §3.1.3. Match points. Archived(PDF) from the original on 25 June 2008. Retrieved 21 May 2008. A win is worth 30,000 points and a draw 10,000 points. [...] If a match ends with a penalty shoot-out, both teams are awarded 10,000 points (as for a draw). In addition, the winning team is awarded an extra 10,000 points. The goals scored in the penalty shoot-out do not count.
^"FIFA/Coca-Cola World Rankings: Overview of basic principles and method of calculation". FIFA. Archived from the original on 8 March 2005. Retrieved 23 June 2008. A special exception is made for matches that are decided on penalties; the winning team earns the full number of points for a win, while the losing team gets the number of points that would have been awarded for a draw. [...] In matches decided on penalties, only goals scored during regular playing time or extra time are considered in the calculation.
^Grkinic, Nada (31 May 2003). "Serbia & Montenegro's new dawn". bbc.co.uk. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 29 June 2008. Red Star Belgrade had won the European Cup in 1991 and, despite the poverty of that particular performance – they played for penalties against Marseille from kick-off – the club was rich in talent.
^Rookwood, Dan; Cunningham, Matthew (19 June 2003). "Made in Britain – but successful abroad?". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 26 August 2016. Retrieved 6 July 2016. OM reached the European Cup final in 1991 but were beaten by a shameful Red Star Belgrade side who played for penalties from the start.
^Smyth, Rob (10 July 2007). "The joy of six: inspired tactical switches". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 13 July 2007. Retrieved 14 July 2021. We realised we could not really beat Marseille unless they made a mistake, so I told my players to be patient and to wait for penalties, said the manager Petrović.
لمعانٍ أخرى، طالع بيت الشامي (توضيح). بيت الشامي (محلة) تقسيم إداري البلد اليمن المحافظة محافظة إب المديرية مديرية حبيش العزلة عزلة جبل عميقة القرية قرية المقداحه السفلى السكان التعداد السكاني 2004 السكان 42 • الذكور 23 • الإناث 19 • عدد الأسر 5 • عدد الم
Iglesia de la Resurrección del Hijo de la Viuda de Naín כנסיית בן האלמנה Vista de la iglesiaLocalizaciónPaís IsraelDivisión NaínDirección NaínCoordenadas 32°37′50″N 35°21′01″E / 32.63069444, 35.35013889Información religiosaCulto Iglesia católicaMapa de localización Iglesia de la Resurrección del Hijo de la Viuda de Naín Mapa[editar datos en Wikidata] La Iglesia de la Resurrección del Hijo de la Viuda de Naín[1] o si...
See also: 2018 United States gubernatorial elections 2018 Pennsylvania gubernatorial election ← 2014 November 6, 2018 2022 → Nominee Tom Wolf Scott Wagner Party Democratic Republican Running mate John Fetterman Jeff Bartos Popular vote 2,895,662 2,039,899 Percentage 57.8% 40.7% County results Congressional district results Precinct resultsWolf: 40–50% 50–60% 60...
النقاش التالي بشأن حذف المقالة الآتي ذكرها قد أغلق وأرشف. لا تعدله. أي مراجعة بعد هذا النقاش يجب أن تحدث في الصفحات المختصة، كصفحة نقاش المقالة إذا لم تكن قد حذفت أو ضمن طلبات مراجعة نتيجة نقاش الحذف إذا كان هناك اعتراض على الحذف، لا يجب عمل أي تعديل إضافي هنا. نتيجة مراجعة ا...
Hundimiento de El KarinaFecha 14 de noviembre de 1981Hora 11:48 PMCausa Confrontación armadaLugar Puerto de Charambirá (Valle del Cauca), ColombiaResultado Hundimiento de la nave, con su carga.Origen Colombia ColombiaDestino Colombia ColombiaImplicadoTipo Buque de cargaOperador M-19Nombre El KarinaTripulación 3Supervivientes 3 [editar datos en Wikidata] Hundimiento de El Karina, también llamado Hundimiento del buque Karina fue un accidente marítimo en el que estuviero...
American television series For other uses, see American Family. Loud Family redirects here. For the unrelated animated TV series featuring a family with the same surname, see The Loud House. For the unrelated rock band, see The Loud Family. An American FamilyThe Loud Family (Back, from left: Kevin, Grant, Delilah and Lance. Front, from left: Michele, Pat and Bill)GenreDocumentary/RealityCountry of originUnited StatesOriginal languageEnglishNo. of seasons1No. of episodes12ProductionProducerCra...
Jajaran genjang. Sisi-sisinya ditampilkan dengan warna biru dan diagonal dengan warna merah. Dalam matematika, bentuk paling sederhana dari Hukum jajaran genjang (juga disebut Identitas jajaran genjang) termasuk dalam geometri dasar. Ini menyatakan bahwa jumlah kuadrat dari panjang keempat sisi jajaran genjang sama dengan jumlah kuadrat dari panjang dua diagonal. Menggunakan notasi pada diagram di sebelah kanan, sisi-sisinya adalah (AB), (BC), (CD), (DA). Tapi karena dalam geometri Euclidean ...
Sint-Niklaaskerk De Sint-Niklaaskerk (Église Saint-Nicolas) is de parochiekerk van de in het departement Pas-de-Calais gelegen plaats Wissant. Dit kerkje heeft een 15e eeuws koor en een hoger schip met een dakruiter. Van belang is de kruisweg. Ook is er een beeld van de hier vereerde Sint-Wilgefortis te vinden. Mediabestanden Zie de categorie Église Saint-Nicolas de Wissant van Wikimedia Commons voor mediabestanden over dit onderwerp.
Artikel ini perlu diwikifikasi agar memenuhi standar kualitas Wikipedia. Anda dapat memberikan bantuan berupa penambahan pranala dalam, atau dengan merapikan tata letak dari artikel ini. Untuk keterangan lebih lanjut, klik [tampil] di bagian kanan. Mengganti markah HTML dengan markah wiki bila dimungkinkan. Tambahkan pranala wiki. Bila dirasa perlu, buatlah pautan ke artikel wiki lainnya dengan cara menambahkan [[ dan ]] pada kata yang bersangkutan (lihat WP:LINK untuk keterangan lebih lanjut...
RiichProduct typeAutomotiveOwnerChery AutomobileCountryChinaIntroducedMarch 2009DiscontinuedApril 2013MarketsChinaCompanyIndustryAutomobileHeadquartersWuhu, Anhui Riich (Chinese: 瑞麒; pinyin: Ruìqí) was an upmarket marque of the Chinese automaker Chery. Its models included a microvan, large sedans (the G5 and slightly bigger G6) and supermini Riich M series, including a five-door hatchback (M1), a small sedan (M5) and a five-door crossover (X1). The marque was launched in March 2...
In-flight Internet service Gogo Inc.TypePublic companyTraded asNasdaq: GOGOS&P 600 componentIndustryAviationTechnologyFounded1991; 32 years ago (1991)FounderJimmy RayHeadquartersBroomfield, Colorado, U.S.Area servedWorldwideKey peopleOakleigh Thorne (CEO)ProductsIn-flight entertainmentIn-flight connectivityRevenue US$335.7 million (2021)Operating income US$120.6 million (2021)Net income US$152.7 million (2021)Total assets US$647.7 million (2021)Total equity US$-320....
Sanskriti MuseumEstablished1990LocationSanskriti Kendra, Anandagram, Mehrauli–Gurgaon RoadDelhi, IndiaCoordinates28°32′18″N 77°11′05″E / 28.538457°N 77.184640°E / 28.538457; 77.184640CuratorO. P. JainWebsiteOfficial website Sanskriti Museums are a set of three museums namely, Museum of ‘Everyday Art’, Museum of Indian Terracotta (tribal art) and Textile Museum. It is housed within Sanskriti Kendra complex, at Anandagram,[1] an artist village c...
2016 film by Frank Rajah Arase Ghana Must GoDirected byFrank Rajah AraseProduced byYvonne OkoroStarringYvonne OkoroBlossom ChukwujekwuNkem OwohProductioncompanyDesamour CompanyRelease date June 4, 2016 (2016-06-04) Nigeria[1]CountriesGhana Nigeria Ghana Must Go is a 2016 Ghana-Nigerian romantic comedy film, directed by Frank Rajah Arase. It stars Yvonne Okoro, Blossom Chukwujekwu and Nkem Owoh. The film tells a story of two lovers of different countries on origin, and t...
Alesso discographyAlesso live at Ushuaia, IbizaStudio albums1Singles19Mixtapes2Remixes18 This is the discography of Swedish DJ Alesso. Studio albums List of studio albums, with selected chart positions and certifications Title Details Peak chart positions Certifications SWE[1] AUS[2] AUT[3] BEL[4] NLD[5] SWI[6] UK[7] US[8] Forever Released: 22 May 2015 Label: Def Jam Formats: CD, digital download 4 41 69 43 54 42 24 30 GLF: Gold&...
Overview of road signs in Russia The russian prohibitory signs Road signs in Russia are governed by the traffic rules approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1090 of 23 October 1993 “On the Rules of the Road”, Appendix 1 “Road Signs”.[1] They are regulated by the ГОСТ Р 52289-2019[2] and ГОСТ Р 52290-2004[3] standards determining the rules for the use and production of road signs. The vast majority of road signs used in ...
في روتردام سبتمبر 2017 نظرة عامة الإسم: فئة كاريل دورمان المشغلون: البحرية الملكية الهولندية البحرية الألمانية سبقتها: HNLMS Zuiderkruis HNLMS Amsterdam التكلفة: 480 مليون دولار أمريكي فترة البناء: 2011–2014 قيد الإنشاء: 0 العدد حسب الخطة: 1 إكتمل منها: 1 لمحة تاريخية الإسم: كاريل دورما...
Potassium heptafluorotantalate Names IUPAC name Dipotassium heptafluorotantalate Systematic IUPAC name Dipotassium heptafluorotantalum(2-) Other names Potassium heptafluorotantalate(V)Potassium fluorotantalate Identifiers CAS Number 16924-00-8 Y 3D model (JSmol) Interactive image ChemSpider 28541740 N ECHA InfoCard 100.037.245 EC Number 240-986-1 PubChem CID 28146 CompTox Dashboard (EPA) DTXSID00884943 InChI InChI=1S/7FH.2K.Ta/h7*1H;;;/q;;;;;;;2*+1;+5/p-7 SMILES F[Ta-2](F)(F)(F)(F)(...